Economy & Market

Why Cement Needs CCUS

Published

3 months ago

January 13, 2026

admin

Cement’s deep decarbonisation cannot be achieved through efficiency and fuel switching alone, making CCUS essential to address unavoidable process emissions from calcination. ICR explores if with the right mix of policy support, shared infrastructure, and phased scale-up from pilots to clusters, CCUS can enable India’s cement industry to align growth with its net-zero ambitions.

Cement underpins modern development—from housing and transport to renewable energy infrastructure—but it is also one of the world’s most carbon-intensive materials, with global production of around 4 billion tonnes per year accounting for 7 to 8 per cent of global CO2 emissions, according to the GCCA. What makes cement uniquely hard to abate is that 60 to 65 per cent of its emissions arise from limestone calcination, a chemical process that releases CO2 irrespective of the energy source used; the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) therefore classifies cement as a hard-to-abate sector, noting that even fully renewable-powered kilns would continue to emit significant process emissions. While the industry has achieved substantial reductions over the past two decades through energy efficiency, alternative fuels and clinker substitution using fly ash, slag, and calcined clays, studies including the IEA Net Zero Roadmap and GCCA decarbonisation pathways show these levers can deliver only 50 to 60 per cent emissions reduction before reaching technical and material limits, leaving Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) as the only scalable and durable option to address remaining calcination emissions—an intervention the IPCC estimates will deliver nearly two-thirds of cumulative cement-sector emission reductions globally by mid-century, making CCUS a central pillar of any credible net-zero cement pathway.

Process emissions vs energy emissions
Cement’s carbon footprint is distinct from many other industries because it stems from two sources: energy emissions and process emissions. Energy emissions arise from burning fuels to heat kilns to around 1,450°C and account for roughly 35 to 40 per cent of total cement CO2 emissions, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). These can be progressively reduced through efficiency improvements, alternative fuels such as biomass and RDF, and electrification supported by renewable power. Over the past two decades, such measures have delivered measurable gains, with global average thermal energy intensity in cement production falling by nearly 20 per cent since 2000, as reported by the IEA and GCCA.
The larger and more intractable challenge lies in process emissions, which make up approximately 60 per cent to 65 per cent of cement’s total CO2 output. These emissions are released during calcination, when limestone (CaCO3) is converted into lime (CaO), inherently emitting CO2 regardless of fuel choice or energy efficiency—a reality underscored by the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). Even aggressive clinker substitution using fly ash, slag, or calcined clays is constrained by material availability and performance requirements, typically delivering 20 to 40 per cent emissions reduction at best, as outlined in the GCCA–TERI India Cement Roadmap and IEA Net Zero Scenario. This structural split explains why cement is classified as a hard-to-abate sector and why incremental improvements alone are insufficient; as energy emissions decline, process emissions will dominate, making Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) a critical intervention to intercept residual CO2 and keep the sector’s net-zero ambitions within reach.

Where CCUS stands today
Globally, CCUS in cement is moving from concept to early industrial reality, led by Europe and North America, with the IEA noting that cement accounts for nearly 40 per cent of planned CCUS projects in heavy industry, reflecting limited alternatives for deep decarbonisation; a flagship example is Heidelberg Materials’ Brevik CCS project in Norway, commissioned in 2025, designed to capture about 400,000 tonnes of CO2 annually—nearly half the plant’s emissions—with permanent offshore storage via the Northern Lights infrastructure (Reuters, Heidelberg Materials), alongside progress at projects in the UK, Belgium, and the US such as Padeswood, Lixhe (LEILAC), and Ste. Genevieve, all enabled by strong policy support, public funding, and shared transport-and-storage infrastructure.
These experiences show that CCUS scales fastest when policy support, infrastructure availability, and risk-sharing mechanisms align, with Europe bridging the viability gap through EU ETS allowances, Innovation Fund grants, and CO2 hubs despite capture costs remaining high at US$ 80-150 per tonne of CO2 (IEA, GCCA); India, by contrast, is at an early readiness stage but gaining momentum through five cement-sector CCU testbeds launched by the Department of Science and Technology (DST) under academia–industry public–private partnerships involving IITs and producers such as JSW Cement, Dalmia Cement, and JK Cement, targeting 1-2 tonnes of CO2 per day to validate performance under Indian conditions (ETInfra, DST), with the GCCA–TERI India Roadmap identifying the current phase as a foundation-building decade essential for achieving net-zero by 2070.
Amit Banka, Founder and CEO, WeNaturalists, says “Carbon literacy means more than understanding that CO2 harms the climate. It means cement professionals grasping why their specific plant’s emissions profile matters, how different CCUS technologies trade off between energy consumption and capture rates, where utilisation opportunities align with their operational reality, and what governance frameworks ensure verified, permanent carbon sequestration. Cement manufacturing contributes approximately 8 per cent of global carbon emissions. Addressing this requires professionals who understand CCUS deeply enough to make capital decisions, troubleshoot implementation challenges, and convince boards to invest substantial capital.”

Technology pathways for cement
Cement CCUS encompasses a range of technologies, from conventional post-combustion solvent-based systems to process-integrated solutions that directly target calcination, each with different energy requirements, retrofit complexity, and cost profiles. The most mature option remains amine-based post-combustion capture, already deployed at industrial scale and favoured for early cement projects because it can be retrofitted to existing flue-gas streams; however, capture costs typically range from US$ 60-120 per tonne of CO2, depending on CO2 concentration, plant layout, and energy integration.
Lovish Ahuja, Chief Sustainability Officer, Dalmia Cement (Bharat), says, “CCUS in Indian cement can be viewed through two complementary lenses. If technological innovation, enabling policies, and societal acceptance fail to translate ambition into action, CCUS risks becoming a significant and unavoidable compliance cost for hard-to-abate sectors such as cement, steel, and aluminium. However, if global commitments under the Paris Agreement and national targets—most notably India’s Net Zero 2070 pledge—are implemented at scale through sustained policy and industry action, CCUS shifts from a future liability to a strategic opportunity. In that scenario, it becomes a platform for technological leadership, long-term competitiveness, and systemic decarbonisation rather than merely a regulatory burden.”
“Accelerating CCUS adoption cannot hinge on a single policy lever; it demands a coordinated ecosystem approach. This includes mission-mode governance, alignment across ministries, and a mix of enabling instruments such as viability gap funding, concessional and ESG-linked finance, tax incentives, and support for R&D, infrastructure, and access to geological storage. Importantly, while cement is largely a regional commodity with limited exportability due to its low value-to-weight ratio, CCUS innovation itself can become a globally competitive export. By developing, piloting, and scaling cost-effective CCUS solutions domestically, India can not only decarbonise its own cement industry but also position itself as a supplier of affordable CCUS technologies and services to cement markets worldwide,” he adds.
Process-centric approaches seek to reduce the energy penalty associated with solvent regeneration by altering where and how CO2 is separated. Technologies such as LEILAC/Calix, which uses indirect calcination to produce a high-purity CO2 stream, are scaling toward a ~100,000 tCO2 per year demonstrator (LEILAC-2) following successful pilots, while calcium looping leverages limestone chemistry to achieve theoretical capture efficiencies above 90 per cent, albeit still at pilot and demonstration stages requiring careful integration. Other emerging routes—including oxy-fuel combustion, membrane separation, solid sorbents, and cryogenic or hybrid systems—offer varying trade-offs between purity, energy use, and retrofit complexity; taken together, recent studies suggest that no single technology fits all plants, making a multi-technology, site-specific approach the most realistic pathway for scaling CCUS across the cement sector.
Yash Agarwal, Co-Founder, Carbonetics Carbon Capture, says, “We are fully focused on CCUS, and for us, a running plant is a profitable plant. What we have done is created digital twins that allow operators to simulate and resolve specific problems in record time. In a conventional setup, when an issue arises, plants often have to shut down operations and bring in expert consultants. What we offer instead is on-the-fly consulting. As soon as a problem is detected, the system automatically provides a set of potential solutions that can be tested on a running plant. This approach ensures that plant shutdowns are avoided and production is not impacted.”

The economics of CCUS
Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) remains one of the toughest economic hurdles in cement decarbonisation, with the IEA estimating capture costs of US$ 80-150 per tonne of CO2, and full-system costs raising cement production by US$ 30-60 per tonne, potentially increasing prices by 20 to 40 per cent without policy support—an untenable burden for a low-margin, price-sensitive industry like India’s.
Global experience shows CCUS advances beyond pilots only when the viability gap is bridged through strong policy mechanisms such as EU ETS allowances, Innovation Fund grants, and carbon Contracts for Difference (CfDs), yet even in Europe few projects have reached final investment decision (GCCA); India’s lack of a dedicated CCUS financing framework leaves projects reliant on R&D grants and balance sheets, reinforcing the IEA Net Zero Roadmap conclusion that carbon markets, green public procurement, and viability gap funding are essential to spread costs across producers, policymakers, and end users and prevent CCUS from remaining confined to demonstrations well into the 2030s.

Utilisation or storage
Carbon utilisation pathways are often the first entry point for CCUS in cement because they offer near-term revenue potential and lower infrastructure complexity. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that current utilisation routes—such as concrete curing, mineralisation into aggregates, precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC), and limited chemical conversion—can realistically absorb only 5 per cent to 10 per cent of captured CO2 at a typical cement plant. In India, utilisation is particularly attractive for early pilots as it avoids the immediate need for pipelines, injection wells, and long-term liability frameworks. Accordingly, Department of Science and Technology (DST)–supported cement CCU testbeds are already demonstrating mineralisation and CO2-cured concrete applications at 1–2 tonnes of CO2 per day, validating performance, durability, and operability under Indian conditions.
However, utilisation faces hard limits of scale and permanence. India’s cement sector emits over 200 million tonnes of CO2 annually (GCCA), far exceeding the absorptive capacity of domestic utilisation markets, while many pathways—especially fuels and chemicals—are energy-intensive and dependent on costly renewable power and green hydrogen. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) cautions that most CCU routes do not guarantee permanent storage unless CO2 is mineralised or locked into long-lived materials, making geological storage indispensable for deep decarbonisation. India has credible storage potential in deep saline aquifers, depleted oil and gas fields, and basalt formations such as the Deccan Traps (NITI Aayog, IEA), and hub-based models—where multiple plants share transport and storage infrastructure—can reduce costs and improve bankability, as seen in Norway’s Northern Lights project. The pragmatic pathway for India is therefore a dual-track approach: utilise CO2 where it is economical and store it where permanence and scale are unavoidable, enabling early learning while building the backbone for net-zero cement.

Policy, infrastructure and clusters
Scaling CCUS in the cement sector hinges on policy certainty, shared infrastructure, and coordinated cluster development, rather than isolated plant-level action. The IEA notes that over 70 per cent of advanced industrial CCUS projects globally rely on strong government intervention—through carbon pricing, capital grants, tax credits, and long-term offtake guarantees—with Europe’s EU ETS, Innovation Fund, and carbon Contracts for Difference (CfDs) proving decisive in advancing projects like Brevik CCS. In contrast, India lacks a dedicated CCUS policy framework, rendering capture costs of USD 80–150 per tonne of CO2 economically prohibitive without state support (IEA, GCCA), a gap the GCCA–TERI India Cement Roadmap highlights can be bridged through carbon markets, viability gap funding, and green public procurement.
Milan R Trivedi, Vice President, Shree Digvijay Cement, says, “CCUS represents both an unavoidable near-term compliance cost and a long-term strategic opportunity for Indian cement producers. While current capture costs of US$ 100-150 per tonne of CO2 strain margins and necessitate upfront retrofit investments driven by emerging mandates and NDCs, effective policy support—particularly a robust, long-term carbon pricing mechanism with tradable credits under frameworks like India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS)—can de-risk capital deployment and convert CCUS into a competitive advantage. With such enablers in place, CCUS can unlock 10 per cent to 20 per cent green price premiums, strengthen ESG positioning, and allow Indian cement to compete in global low-carbon markets under regimes such as the EU CBAM, North America’s buy-clean policies, and Middle Eastern green procurement, transforming compliance into export-led leadership.”
Equally critical is cluster-based CO2 transport and storage infrastructure, which can reduce unit costs by 30 to 50 per cent compared to standalone projects (IEA, Clean Energy Ministerial); recognising this, the DST has launched five CCU testbeds under academia–industry public–private partnerships, while NITI Aayog works toward a national CCUS mission focused on hubs and regional planning. Global precedents—from Norway’s Northern Lights to the UK’s HyNet and East Coast clusters—demonstrate that CCUS scales fastest when governments plan infrastructure at a regional level, making cluster-led development, backed by early public investment, the decisive enabler for India to move CCUS from isolated pilots to a scalable industrial solution.
Paul Baruya, Director of Strategy and Sustainability, FutureCoal, says, “Cement is a foundational material with a fundamental climate challenge: process emissions that cannot be eliminated through clean energy alone. The IPCC is clear that in the absence of a near-term replacement of Portland cement chemistry, CCS is essential to address the majority of clinker-related emissions. With global cement production at around 4 gigatonnes (Gt) and still growing, cement decarbonisation is not a niche undertaking, it is a large-scale industrial transition.”

From pilots to practice
Moving CCUS in cement from pilots to practice requires a sequenced roadmap aligning technology maturity, infrastructure development, and policy support: the IEA estimates that achieving net zero will require CCUS to scale from less than 1 Mt of CO2 captured today to over 1.2 Gt annually by 2050, while the GCCA Net Zero Roadmap projects CCUS contributing 30 per cent to 40 per cent of total cement-sector emissions reductions by mid-century, alongside efficiency, alternative fuels, and clinker substitution.
MM Rathi, Joint President – Power Plants, Shree Cement, says, “The Indian cement sector is currently at a pilot to early demonstration stage of CCUS readiness. A few companies have initiated small-scale pilots focused on capturing CO2 from kiln flue gases and exploring utilisation routes such as mineralisation and concrete curing. CCUS has not yet reached commercial integration due to high capture costs (US$ 80-150 per tonne of CO2), lack of transport and storage infrastructure, limited access to storage sites, and absence of long-term policy incentives. While Europe and North America have begun early commercial deployment, large-scale CCUS adoption in India is more realistically expected post-2035, subject to enabling infrastructure and policy frameworks.”
Early pilots—such as India’s DST-backed CCU testbeds and Europe’s first commercial-scale plants—serve as learning platforms to validate integration, costs, and operational reliability, but large-scale deployment will depend on cluster-based scale-up, as emphasised by the IPCC AR6, which highlights the need for early CO2 transport and storage planning to avoid long-term emissions lock-in. For India, the GCCA–TERI India Roadmap identifies CCUS as indispensable for achieving net-zero by 2070, following a pragmatic pathway: pilot today to build confidence, cluster in the 2030s to reduce costs, and institutionalise CCUS by mid-century so that low-carbon cement becomes the default, not a niche, in the country’s infrastructure growth.

Conclusion
Cement will remain indispensable to India’s development, but its long-term viability hinges on addressing its hardest emissions challenge—process CO2 from calcination—which efficiency gains, alternative fuels, and clinker substitution alone cannot eliminate; global evidence from the IPCC, IEA, and GCCA confirms that Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) is the only scalable pathway capable of delivering the depth of reduction required for net zero. With early commercial projects emerging in Europe and structured pilots underway in India, CCUS has moved beyond theory into a decisive decade where learning, localisation, and integration will shape outcomes; however, success will depend less on technology availability and more on collective execution, including coordinated policy frameworks, shared transport and storage infrastructure, robust carbon markets, and carbon-literate capabilities.
For India, a deliberate transition from pilots to practice—anchored in cluster-based deployment, supported by public–private partnerships, and aligned with national development and climate goals—can transform CCUS from a high-cost intervention into a mainstream industrial solution, enabling the cement sector to keep building the nation while sharply reducing its climate footprint.

– Kanika Mathur

Up Next

Industry Bodies Call for Wider Use of Cement Co-Processing

Don't Miss

CCUS has not yet reached commercial integration

Economy & Market

SEW-EURODRIVE India Opens Drive Technology Centre in Chennai

Published

2 weeks ago

March 25, 2026

admin

The new facility strengthens SEW-EURODRIVE India’s manufacturing, assembly and service capabilities

SEW-EURODRIVE India has inaugurated a new Drive Technology Centre (DTC) in Chennai, marking a significant expansion of its manufacturing and service infrastructure in South India. The facility is positioned to enhance the company’s responsiveness and long-term support capabilities for customers across southern and eastern regions of the country.

Built across 12.27 acres, the facility includes a 21,350-square-metre assembly and service setup designed to support future industrial growth, evolving application requirements and capacity expansion. The centre reflects the company’s long-term strategy in India, combining global engineering practices with local manufacturing and service capabilities.

The new facility has been developed in line with green building standards and incorporates sustainable features such as natural daylight utilisation, solar power generation and rainwater harvesting systems. The company has also implemented energy-efficient construction and advanced climate control systems that help reduce shopfloor temperatures by up to 3°C, improving production stability, product quality and working conditions.

A key highlight of the centre is the 15,000-square-metre assembly shop, which features digitisation-ready assembly cells based on a single-piece flow manufacturing concept. The facility also houses SEW-EURODRIVE India’s first semi-automated painting booth, aimed at ensuring uniform surface finish and improving production throughput.

With the commissioning of the Chennai Drive Technology Centre, SEW-EURODRIVE India continues to strengthen its manufacturing footprint and reinforces its long-term commitment to supporting industrial growth and automation development in India.

Concrete

Material Flow Efficiency

Published

3 weeks ago

March 18, 2026

admin

We explore how material handling systems are becoming strategic assets in cement plants, enabling efficient movement of raw materials, clinker and finished cement. Advanced conveying, automation and digital technologies are improving plant productivity while supporting energy efficiency and sustainability goals.

Material handling systems form the operational backbone of cement plants, enabling the efficient movement of raw materials, clinker and finished cement across complex production networks. With India’s cement industry producing over 391 million tonnes of cement in FY2024 and possessing an installed capacity of around 668 mtpa, according to the CRISIL Research Industry Report, 2025, efficient material logistics have become critical to maintaining plant productivity and cost competitiveness. At the same time, cement production is highly energy intensive and contributes around 7 per cent to
8 per cent of global CO2 emissions, making efficient material flow and logistics optimisation essential for reducing operational inefficiencies and emissions states the International Energy Agency Cement Technology Roadmap, 2023. As plants scale capacity and integrate digital technologies, modern material handling systems, ranging from automated conveyors to intelligent stockyards, are increasingly recognised as strategic assets that influence plant stability, energy efficiency and environmental performance.

Strategic role of material handling
Material handling is no longer viewed as a secondary utility within cement plants; it is now recognised as a strategic system that directly influences production efficiency and process stability.
Cement manufacturing involves the continuous movement of large volumes of limestone, clay, additives, clinker and finished cement across multiple production stages. Even minor disruptions in conveying systems or storage infrastructure can lead to kiln feed fluctuations, production delays and significant financial losses. According to Indian Cement Industry Operational Benchmarking Study, 2024, unplanned downtime in large integrated cement plants can cost between Rs.15–20 lakh per hour, highlighting the economic importance of reliable material handling systems.
Modern cement plants are therefore investing in advanced mechanical handling systems designed for high throughput and operational reliability. Large integrated plants can process over 10,000 tonnes per day of clinker, requiring highly efficient conveying systems and automated stockyards to maintain continuous material flow, suggests the International Cement Review Industry Analysis, 2024. Efficient material handling also reduces spillage, minimises dust emissions and improves workplace safety. As cement plants become larger and more technologically advanced, the role of material handling is evolving from simple transport infrastructure to a critical operational system that supports both productivity and sustainability.

From quarry to plant
The transport of raw materials from quarry to processing plant represents one of the most energy-intensive stages of cement production. Traditionally, limestone and other raw materials were transported using diesel-powered trucks, which resulted in high fuel consumption, dust generation and increased operational costs. However, modern plants are increasingly adopting long-distance belt conveyors and pipe conveyors as a more efficient alternative. These systems allow continuous material transport over distances of 10–15 kilometres, significantly reducing fuel consumption and operating costs while improving environmental performance, states the FLSmidth Cement Industry Technology Report, 2024.
Milind Khangan, Marketing Manager, Vertex Market Research & Consulting, says, “Efficient and enclosed handling of fine materials such as cement, fly ash and slag requires modern pneumatic conveying systems. By optimising the air-to-material ratio, these systems can reduce energy consumption by 10 per cent to 15 per cent while ensuring smooth material flow. Closed-loop conveying further minimises dust loading and improves the performance of bag filters, supporting cleaner plant operations. In addition, flow-regulated conveying lines help prevent clogging and maintain reliable dispatch performance. Overall, automation in pneumatic conveying delivers immediate operational benefits, including improved equipment uptime, lower energy use, reduced material spillage and more stable kiln and mill performance.”
Pipe conveyor systems are particularly gaining traction because they provide a completely enclosed transport system that prevents material spillage and dust emissions. According to global cement engineering studies, conveyor-based transport can reduce energy consumption by up to 30 per cent compared to truck haulage, while also improving operational reliability. Several cement plants in India have already implemented such systems to stabilise quarry-to-plant logistics while reducing carbon emissions associated with diesel transport.

Stockyard management and homogenisation
Stockyards play a critical role in maintaining raw material consistency and stabilising kiln feed quality. Modern cement plants use advanced stacker and reclaimer systems to ensure efficient storage and blending of raw materials before they enter the grinding and pyroprocessing stages. Automated stacking methods such as chevron or windrow stacking enable uniform distribution of materials, while bridge-type or portal reclaimers ensure consistent extraction during kiln feed preparation. These systems are essential for maintaining stable chemical composition of raw meal, which directly influences kiln efficiency and clinker quality. The Cement Plant Operations Handbook, 2024 indicates that advanced homogenisation systems can reduce raw mix variability by up to 50 per cent, significantly improving kiln stability and energy efficiency. Integrated stockyard management systems also incorporate sensors for monitoring bulk density, moisture levels and stockpile volumes, enabling real-time control over material blending processes.

Clinker and cement conveying technologies
Once clinker is produced in the kiln, it must be efficiently transported to storage silos and subsequently to grinding and packing units. Modern cement plants rely on high-capacity belt conveyors, bucket elevators and pneumatic conveying systems to manage this stage of material flow. Steel-cord belt bucket elevators are now capable of lifting materials to heights exceeding 120 metres with capacities reaching 1,500 tonnes per hour, making them suitable for large-scale clinker production lines, states the European Cement Engineering Association Technical Paper, 2023.
For fine materials such as cement, fly ash and slag, pneumatic conveying systems provide a reliable and dust-free solution. These systems transport powdered materials using controlled airflow, ensuring enclosed and contamination-free movement between grinding units, silos and packing stations. Optimised pneumatic systems can reduce energy consumption by 10 per cent to 15 per cent compared to older conveying technologies, while also improving plant cleanliness and environmental compliance, according to the Global Cement Technology Review, 2024.

Automation and digitalisation
Digitalisation is transforming material handling systems by introducing real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance and automated control. Advanced sensors and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) platforms enable plant operators to track conveyor health, stockpile levels and equipment performance in real time. Predictive maintenance systems analyse vibration patterns, temperature fluctuations and equipment load data to detect potential failures before they occur. According to McKinsey’s Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Report, 2023, for heavy industries, digital monitoring and predictive maintenance technologies can reduce equipment downtime by up to 30 per cent and increase productivity by 10 per cent to 15 per cent. Digital control centres also integrate data from conveyors, stacker reclaimers and dispatch systems, enabling centralised management of material flows from quarry to dispatch.

Handling of AFR
The growing adoption of Alternative Fuels and Raw Materials (AFR) has introduced new challenges and opportunities for material handling systems in cement plants. AFR materials such as refuse-derived fuel (RDF), biomass and industrial waste often have irregular particle sizes, variable moisture content and lower bulk density compared to conventional fuels. As a result, specialised storage, dosing and feeding systems are required to ensure consistent kiln combustion. According to the Cement Sector Decarbonisation Roadmap published by NITI Aayog in 2026, increasing the use of AFR could enable India’s cement sector to achieve thermal substitution rates of around 20 per cent in the coming decades. To support this transition, plants are investing in automated receiving stations, shredding units, drying systems and precision dosing equipment to stabilise AFR supply and combustion performance.

Energy efficiency and dust control
Material handling systems also play a crucial role in improving plant energy efficiency and environmental performance. Modern conveyor systems equipped with variable speed drives and energy-efficient motors can significantly reduce electricity consumption. Permanent magnet motors used in conveyor drives can deliver 8 per cent to 12 per cent energy savings compared to conventional induction motors, improving overall plant energy efficiency according to the IEA Industrial Energy Efficiency Study, 2023. Dust control is another major concern in cement plants, particularly during material transfer and storage operations. Enclosed conveyors, dust extraction systems and advanced bag filters are widely used to minimise particulate emissions and improve workplace safety.

Future trends in material handling
The future of material handling in cement plants will be shaped by automation, digitalisation and sustainability considerations. Emerging technologies such as AI-driven logistics optimisation, autonomous mobile equipment and digital twins are expected to further improve plant efficiency and operational visibility. Digital twin models allow engineers to simulate material flow patterns, optimise stockyard operations and predict equipment performance under different operating conditions. According to the International Energy Agency Digitalisation and Energy Report, 2024, the adoption of advanced digital technologies could improve industrial energy efficiency by up to 20 per cent in heavy industries such as cement manufacturing. As cement plants expand capacity and adopt low-carbon technologies, intelligent material handling systems will play a critical role in maintaining productivity and reducing environmental impact.

Conclusion
Material handling systems have evolved from basic transport infrastructure into strategic operational systems that directly influence plant efficiency, reliability and sustainability. From quarry transport and automated stockyards to digital dispatch platforms and advanced conveying technologies, modern material handling solutions enable cement plants to manage large production volumes while maintaining process stability.
As India’s cement industry continues to expand to meet infrastructure and urban development demands, investments in advanced material handling technologies will become increasingly important. By integrating automation, digital monitoring and energy-efficient systems, cement manufacturers can improve operational performance while supporting the industry’s long-term sustainability and decarbonisation goals.

Kanika Mathur

Concrete

Modernise to Optimise

Published

3 weeks ago

March 18, 2026

admin

Cement plant modernisation is reshaping the industry through upgrades in
kilns, energy systems, digitalisation, AFR integration and advanced material
handling. We explore these technologies that improve efficiency, reduce
emissions, strengthen competitiveness, while preparing the industry for India’s
next phase of infrastructure growth.

India’s cement industry, the world’s second-largest, is undergoing a rapid transformation driven by infrastructure demand, decarbonisation targets and technological advancement. The sector’s installed capacity stood at approximately 668 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) in FY2025 and is projected to reach 915–925 mtap by 2030, supported by large-scale capacity expansions and infrastructure investment cycles, suggests CRISIL Intelligence Industry Report, 2025. At the same time, cement production remains highly energy intensive and contributes about 6 per cent to 7 per cent of India’s total greenhouse gas emissions, making efficiency improvements and modernisation critical for long-term sustainability as stated in CareEdge ESG Research, 2025. As a result, cement manufacturers are investing in advanced kiln technologies, digital monitoring systems, waste heat recovery, alternative fuels, and modern material handling infrastructure to enhance productivity while aligning with global decarbonisation pathways.

Need for modernisation
The need for plant modernisation is closely linked to the sector’s rapid capacity expansion and rising operational complexity. India’s installed cement capacity has grown significantly in the last decade and is expected to exceed 900 mtpa by 2030, driven by demand from housing, infrastructure and urban development projects, as per the CRISIL Intelligence Industry Report, 2025. However, increasing scale also places pressure on energy efficiency, logistics, and production stability. The report also suggests that the cement plants must upgrade equipment and processes to operate at higher utilisation rates, which are projected to reach 75 per cent to 77 per cent by the end of the decade, compared to around 72 per cent to 74 per cent in FY2026.
Environmental imperatives are another major driver of modernisation. Cement manufacturing is responsible for a significant share of industrial emissions because clinker production requires high-temperature processes that depend heavily on fossil fuels. According to CareEdge ESG research, the cement sector contributes 6–7 per cent of India’s total greenhouse gas emissions, with approximately 97 per cent of emissions arising from direct fuel combustion and process emissions in kilns. Consequently, plant modernisation initiatives now focus not only on productivity improvements but also on reducing emissions intensity, energy consumption, and reliance on conventional fuels.
“One of the most impactful upgrades implemented at Shree Cement in the last five years has been the adoption of advanced data management platforms that provide real-time visibility across major process areas. This digital advancement has strengthened plant automation by enabling faster and more accurate responses to process variations while improving the reliability of control loops. Real-time dashboards, integrated analytics and automated alerts now support quicker, data-driven decision-making, helping optimise kiln and mill performance, improve energy control and detect deviations early. By consolidating data from multiple systems into a unified digital environment, the company has enhanced operational consistency, reduced downtime and improved both productivity and compliance. This shift towards intelligent automation and real-time data management has become a key driver of operational excellence and future-ready plant management,” says Satish Maheshwari, Chief Manufacturing Officer, Shree Cement.

Kiln and pyroprocessing upgradation
The kiln remains the technological heart of cement manufacturing, and modernisation efforts often begin with upgrades to pyroprocessing systems. Many older plants in India operate with four- or five-stage preheaters, while modern plants increasingly adopt six-stage preheater and pre-calciner systems that significantly improve heat efficiency and clinker output. These systems enhance heat transfer, reduce fuel consumption, and stabilise kiln operations under high throughput conditions.
Professor Procyon Mukherjee suggests, “Cement manufacturing is, at its core, a thermal process. The rotary kiln and calciner together account for energy consumption and emissions. The theoretical thermal requirement for clinker production is around 1700–1800 MJ per tonne, yet real-world plants often operate far above this benchmark due to inefficiencies in combustion, heat recovery and material flow. Modernisation, therefore, must begin with the
kiln system, and not peripheral automation or
isolated upgrades. The shift from wet to dry process kilns, combined with multi-stage preheaters and precalciners, has already delivered step-change improvements, making dry kilns nearly 50 per cent more energy efficient.”
Recent investment programmes across the industry have included kiln cooler upgrades, advanced burners, and improved refractory materials designed to increase operational reliability and reduce specific heat consumption. Such upgrades are essential because cement production remains highly energy intensive, and continuous efficiency improvements are required to meet global decarbonisation targets. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA) Cement Tracking Report, 2023, the cement sector must achieve annual emissions intensity reductions of around 4 per cent through 2030 to align with global net-zero scenarios.

Energy efficiency and WHRS
Energy efficiency remains one of the most important areas of modernisation in cement manufacturing, given the sector’s heavy reliance on thermal and electrical energy. Modern plants deploy advanced process controls, efficient grinding systems, and improved combustion technologies to reduce specific energy consumption. The adoption of energy-efficient technologies is particularly important in India, where energy costs account for a large share of production expenses. As demand grows and plants expand capacity, improving energy performance becomes essential to maintain competitiveness.
Waste Heat Recovery Systems (WHRS) have emerged as a key solution for improving plant energy efficiency. During cement production, large volumes of high-temperature gases are released from kilns and coolers. WHRS technology captures this waste heat and converts it into electricity, thereby reducing reliance on external power sources. According to energy benchmarking studies for the Indian cement industry, installed waste heat recovery capacity in the sector has reached approximately 840 MW, with an additional potential of around 500 MW states the Green Business Centre, Energy Benchmarking Report, 2023. Several leading producers have already implemented large WHRS installations; for example, UltraTech Cement has deployed systems with around 121 MW of waste heat recovery capacity, reducing carbon emissions by nearly 0.5 million tonnes annually according to the Energy Alternatives India Case Study, 2024.

Integration of AFR
The integration of Alternative Fuels and Raw Materials (AFR) is another critical dimension of cement plant modernisation. AFR refers to the use of industrial waste, biomass, refuse-derived fuel (RDF), and other non-fossil materials as substitutes for conventional fuels such as coal and petcoke. Increasing the use of AFR helps reduce fossil fuel consumption while simultaneously addressing waste management challenges. According to the NITI Aayog Decarbonisation Roadmap, 2026, scaling the use of RDF and other alternative fuels could enable the sector to achieve thermal substitution rates of around 20 per cent in the coming decades.
However, integrating AFR requires significant plant modifications and operational adjustments. Waste-derived fuels often have inconsistent calorific values, higher moisture content, and heterogeneous physical properties compared to traditional fuels. As a result, modern plants invest in advanced fuel preparation systems, dedicated feeding equipment, and automated dosing technologies to ensure stable kiln operation. These upgrades allow plants to maintain consistent clinker quality while increasing the share of alternative fuels in their energy mix.

Digitalisation and smart plant operations
Digitalisation is rapidly transforming cement plant operations by enabling data-driven decision-making and predictive maintenance. Industry 4.0 technologies such as IoT sensors, artificial intelligence (AI), and advanced analytics are now used to monitor equipment performance, optimise process parameters, and anticipate maintenance requirements. These digital tools enable plant operators to detect early signs of equipment failure, minimise unplanned downtime, and improve operational efficiency. Predictive maintenance systems, for example, analyse vibration, temperature, and acoustic signals from rotating equipment to identify potential faults
before they escalate into major breakdowns. Digital twins and integrated control systems further allow operators to simulate plant performance under different scenarios and optimise production strategies. Such technologies are becoming increasingly important as cement plants operate at larger scales and higher levels of process complexity.
Maheshwari also adds, “Plant modernisation is also increasingly central to the global competitiveness of Indian cement manufacturers. As cost pressures rise across energy, logistics and regulatory compliance, modern plants offer the structural efficiency required to operate reliably and competitively over the long term. Technologies such as AI-driven Advanced Process Control (APC) integrated with real-time data systems are emerging as essential investments for the future. These platforms use predictive algorithms, machine learning and live process inputs to optimise kiln, mill and utility operations with greater precision than traditional control systems. By continuously analysing variations in feed chemistry, temperature profiles, energy demand and equipment behaviour, APC enables stable operations, lower specific energy consumption, reduced emissions and improved product consistency. As regulatory expectations tighten and plants pursue higher efficiency with lower carbon intensity, AI-enabled APC will play a crucial role in strengthening automation, enhancing decision-making and ensuring long-term operational resilience.”

Modern material handling and logistics
Material handling systems play a critical role in ensuring smooth plant operations and efficient logistics. Modern cement plants rely on advanced conveying systems, automated stockyards, and digital dispatch platforms to manage the movement of raw materials, clinker, and finished cement. Long-distance belt conveyors and pipe conveyors are increasingly replacing truck-based transport between quarries and plants, reducing fuel consumption, dust emissions, and operational costs. Automated stacker-reclaimers ensure consistent blending of raw materials,
which improves kiln stability and clinker quality. Meanwhile, advanced packing and dispatch systems equipped with high-speed rotary packers and robotic palletisers enhance throughput and reduce manual labour. These technologies allow cement plants to optimise logistics efficiency while supporting higher production capacities.

Emission control and environmental compliance
Environmental compliance has become a central focus of cement plant modernisation as regulators and investors place greater emphasis on sustainability performance. Modern plants deploy advanced emission control technologies such as high-efficiency bag filters, electrostatic precipitators, and selective non-catalytic reduction systems to reduce particulate matter and nitrogen oxide emissions.
Sine Bogh Skaarup, Vice President, Head of Green Innovation and R&D, Fuller Technologies says, “One of our key focus areas is decarbonisation. We help cement producers reduce CO2 and overall carbon emissions. We offer alternative fuel solutions and calcined clay technologies to enable the production of LC3 cement, which play a significant role in decarbonising the cement industry. By combining alternative fuels and calcined clay solutions, CO2 emissions can be reduced by up to 50 per cent, making this a highly impactful approach for sustainable cement production.”
Continuous emission monitoring systems are increasingly used to track environmental performance in real time and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. In addition to air pollution control, cement companies are also investing in water recycling systems, renewable energy integration, and carbon reduction initiatives. These measures are essential for aligning the sector with national climate goals and improving the environmental footprint of
cement manufacturing.

Economic benefits and future outlook
Beyond environmental and operational advantages, cement plant modernisation also delivers significant economic benefits. Energy efficiency improvements, digital process optimisation, and advanced material handling systems reduce operating costs and improve asset utilisation. Waste heat recovery and alternative fuels help lower fuel expenditure and reduce exposure to volatile fossil fuel markets. As the industry expands capacity to meet growing demand, modernised plants are better positioned to achieve higher productivity and maintain profitability. The long-term outlook for the sector remains positive, with India expected to continue large-scale infrastructure investments in roads, housing, railways, and urban development.
Milan R Trivedi, Vice President – Projects, Prod & QC, MR, Shree Digvijay Cement, says, “The main focus in case of modernisation projects drives through the investment decision, which is mainly based on IRR and impact on overall efficiency improvement, cost optimisation and improvement in reliability. However, there are certain modernisation, which has high impact on environmental impact, statutory requirements, etc. has higher priority irrespective of ROI or payback period.”
“The energy efficiency and reliability investment projects generally provide fast return on investment whereas strategic, digitalisation and environmental investment projects provide long term and compounded benefits. Typical modernisation investment projects are decided with IRR of about > 20 per cent, payback period of typically 2-3 years for fast-track projects,” he adds.
In this context, modernisation will remain a key strategic priority for cement manufacturers seeking to maintain competitiveness in an increasingly sustainability-focused market.

Conclusion
The modernisation of cement plants is no longer a purely technical upgrade but a strategic transformation that reshapes how the industry operates. As India’s cement sector expands capacity toward the next growth cycle, improvements in energy efficiency, digitalisation, alternative fuels and advanced logistics will determine the competitiveness of individual plants. Modern technologies allow producers to operate at higher productivity levels while simultaneously reducing energy consumption and emissions intensity.
Looking ahead, the pace of technological adoption will play a decisive role in shaping the future of
the cement industry. Companies that successfully integrate modern equipment, digital systems, and sustainable production practices will be better positioned to meet rising infrastructure demand while aligning with global climate commitments. In this evolving landscape, plant modernisation stands as the cornerstone of both operational excellence and environmental responsibility.