Ashok Dembla, President and Managing Director, KhD Humboldt, in conversation with Kanika Mathur about the use of technology in the grinding process.
The cement industry, responsible for nearly seven per cent of global CO2 emissions, faces a pressing challenge: balancing growth with sustainability. As companies strive for net-zero emissions, innovations in alternative fuels, carbon capture, and energy efficiency are reshaping the sector. From blended cement to cutting-edge kiln electrification, the industry is moving toward a future beyond carbon. In this interview, ICR explores the evolving technologies and strategies driving cement’s decarbonisation journey.
Tell us about cement beyond carbon.
The cement industry contributes approximately 7 per cent of global carbon dioxide emissions, making it one of the largest industrial contributors to climate change. This places a great responsibility on the industry to reduce emissions and promote sustainability. It becomes a moral obligation for us to work toward carbon neutrality or even carbon negativity to protect the environment and ensure a sustainable future for humanity.
Many companies in the cement industry have already pledged to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 or beyond. At KHD, our focus is on technological innovation to achieve the vision of cement beyond carbon. Cement remains an essential material for infrastructure development and economic growth, and the challenge is to meet this demand while minimising its carbon footprint.
Currently, conventional methods like producing blended cement, which uses less clinker and more fly ash or slag, have been instrumental in reducing emissions. Additionally, technologies like Waste Heat Recovery (WHR) systems have seen significant adoption in India. WHR systems allow plants to recover and reuse heat, improving efficiency. Another method is the use of Alternative Fuels and Raw materials (AFR). While the industry was at just 4 per cent usage of AFR previously, we have now reached around 7 per cent, with an ultimate goal of surpassing 35 per cent, which is the global benchmark.
However, these conventional methods alone will not suffice to achieve complete decarbonisation. Advanced technologies are being explored, such as capturing carbon dioxide from exhaust gases, improving system efficiencies, and implementing oxy-fuel combustion or electrification of kilns. While these technologies are still in various stages of development, I believe they will become economically viable after 2030. The industry’s focus is on continuous research and development to integrate these technologies into our processes effectively.
How is your technology adapting to changing fuels and raw materials?
The use of alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR) is continuously evolving within the cement industry. As a machinery supplier, we are adapting to these changes by providing advanced solutions for handling and processing AFR. One of our most significant innovations is the PyroRotor, an equipment designed specifically for feeding up to 85 per cent of alternative fuels into the pyroclone, which is far beyond what conventional methods can achieve. This has greatly enhanced our ability to replace traditional fuels with more sustainable alternatives.
In addition, we have developed solutions to address nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, a critical environmental concern. Our NOx reduction equipment significantly minimises NOx generation during the production process, helping plants meet stringent regulatory requirements.
Optimisation is another critical focus area. Through digitisation and advanced process control systems like PRO-MAX, we are able to optimise the entire cement production process. This system includes kiln and mill control modules, allowing plants to operate more efficiently and reduce both thermal and electrical energy consumption.
Globally, the industry is also moving toward more advanced technologies, such as increasing oxygen content in fuel firing and capturing carbon dioxide directly from flue gases. While these technologies are already being implemented in some European plants, they require significant capital investment and governmental support. India is also taking steps in this direction, with plans for model plants to showcase the viability of these advanced solutions.
Do any of your solutions have an impact on energy utilisation in cement plants?
Energy utilisation in cement plants involves two main types: thermal energy and electrical energy. On the thermal energy front, significant progress has been made over the past decade. Previously, plants required around 750 kilocalories per kilogram of clinker. Today, this has been reduced to 685 kilocalories or even lower, thanks to continuous improvements in process efficiency.
For electrical energy, we have optimised systems like the roller press, which enhances the efficiency of raw material grinding and cement grinding. These advancements have significantly reduced energy consumption per ton of clinker produced.
Energy optimisation is an ongoing process. By integrating advanced technologies and optimising plant operations, we aim to achieve even greater reductions in energy consumption, contributing to both cost savings and environmental sustainability.
How do you see the journey toward net zero unfolding, and what is your perspective on this?
The journey toward net zero is both challenging and rewarding. One of the critical areas we have focused on is the increased use of alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR). The technology to utilise AFR is available, but its successful implementation depends on a well-organised system for waste collection and processing.
In India, progress has been made in cities like Indore and Bengaluru, where systems for waste segregation and preparation are more developed. However, there is still a long way to go to make this a common practice across the country. Government support is crucial in this regard, especially in establishing efficient logistics systems to transport waste from its generation point to cement plants for use as fuel.
Collaboration between industries, government bodies, and city administrations is essential to achieve the full potential of AFR utilisation. The ultimate goal is to make the use of AFR economically viable while ensuring that the logistics and supply chain challenges are effectively addressed.
Net zero is not just a technological goal; it is a systemic change that requires the entire ecosystem to work together. While the industry has made significant strides, much work remains to be done to make net zero a reality.
Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology
India is simultaneously grappling with two crises: a mounting waste emergency and an urgent need to decarbonise its most carbon-intensive industries. The cement sector, the second-largest in the world and the backbone of the nation’s infrastructure ambitions, sits at the centre of both. It consumes enormous quantities of fossil fuel, and it has the technical capacity to consume something else entirely: the waste our cities cannot get rid of.
According to CPCB and NITI Aayog projections, India generates approximately 62.4 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with that figure expected to reach 165 million tonnes by 2030. Much of this waste is energy-rich and non-recyclable. At the same time, cement kilns operate at material temperatures of approximately 1,450 degrees Celsius, with gas temperatures reaching 2,000 degrees. This high-temperature environment is ideal for co-processing, ensuring the complete thermal destruction of organic compounds without generating toxic residues. The physics are in our favour. The infrastructure is not.
Pre-processing is not the support act for co-processing. It is the main event. Get the particle size wrong, get the moisture wrong, get the calorific value wrong and your kiln thermal stability will suffer the consequences.
The Regulatory Push Is Real
The Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules 2026 mandate that cement plants progressively replace solid fossil fuels with Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), starting at a 5 per cent baseline and scaling to 15 per cent within six years. NITI Aayog’s 2026 Roadmap for Cement Sector Decarbonisation targets 20 to 25 per cent Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) by 2030. Beyond compliance, every tonne of coal replaced by RDF generates measurable carbon reductions which is monetisable under India’s emerging Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). TSR is no longer a sustainability metric. It is a financial lever.
Yet our own field assessments across multiple Indian cement plants reveal a sobering reality: the primary barrier to scaling AFR adoption is not waste availability. It is the fragmented and under-engineered pre-processing ecosystem that sits between the waste and the kiln.
Why Indian Waste Is a Different Engineering Problem
Indian municipal solid waste is not the material that imported shredding equipment was designed for. Our waste streams frequently exceed 40 per cent to 50 per cent moisture content, particularly during monsoon cycles, saturated with abrasive inerts including sand, glass, and stone. Plants relying on imported OEM equipment face months of downtime awaiting proprietary spare parts. Machines built for segregated, low-moisture waste fail quickly and disrupt the entire pre-processing operation in Indian conditions.
The two most common failures we observe are what I call the biting teeth problem and the chewing teeth problem. Plants relying solely on a primary shredder reduce bulk waste to large fractions, but the output remains too coarse for stable kiln combustion. Others attempt to use a secondary shredder as a standalone unit without a primary stage to pre-size the feed, leading to catastrophic mechanical failure. When both stages are present but mismatched in throughput capacity, the system becomes a bottleneck. Achieving the 40 to 70 tonnes per hour required for meaningful coal displacement demands a precisely coordinated two-stage process.
Engineering a Made-in-India Answer
At Fornnax, our response to these challenges is grounded in one principle: Indian waste demands Indian engineering. Our systems are built around feedstock homogeneity, the holy grail of kiln stability. Consistent particle size and predictable calorific value are the foundation of stable kiln combustion. Without them, no TSR target is achievable at scale.
Our SR-MAX2500 Dual Shaft Primary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive) processes raw, baled, or loosely mixed MSW, C&I waste, bulky waste, and plastics, reducing them to approximately 150 mm fractions at throughputs of up to 40 tonnes per hour. The R-MAX 3300 Single Shaft Secondary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive), introduced in 2025, takes that primary output and produces RDF fractions in the 30 to 80 mm range at up to 30 tonnes per hour, specifically optimised for consistent kiln feeding. We have also introduced electric drive configurations under the SR-100 HD series, with capacities between 5 and 40 tonnes per hour, already operational at a leading Indian waste-processing facility.
Looking ahead, Fornnax is expanding its portfolio with the upcoming SR-MAX3600 Hydraulic Drive primary shredder at up to 70 tonnes per hour and the R-MAX2100 Hydraulic drive secondary shredder at up to 20 tonnes per hour, designed specifically for the large-scale throughput that higher TSR ambitions require.
The Investment Case Is Now
The 2070 Net-Zero target is not a distant goal for India’s cement sector. It starts today, with decisions being made on the plant floor.
The SWM Rules 2026 are already in effect, requiring cement plants to replace coal with RDF. Carbon credit markets are opening up, and coal prices are not going to get cheaper. Every tonne of coal a cement plant replaces with waste-derived fuel saves money on one side and generates carbon credit revenue on the other. Pre-processing infrastructure is no longer just a compliance requirement. It is a business investment with a measurable return.
The good news is that nothing is missing. The technology works. The waste is available in every Indian city. The government has provided the policy direction. The only thing standing between where the industry is today and where it needs to be is the commitment to build the right infrastructure.
The cement companies that move now will not just meet the regulations. They will be ahead of every competitor that waits.
About The Author
Jignesh Kundaria is the Director and CEO of Fornnax Technology. Over an experience spanning more than two decades in the recycling industry, he has established himself as one of India’s foremost voices on waste-to-fuel technology and alternative fuel infrastructure.
The World Cement Association (WCA) has announced SiloConnect as its newest associate corporate member, expanding its network of technology providers supporting digitalisation in the cement industry. SiloConnect offers smart sensor technology that provides real-time visibility of cement inventory levels at customer silos, enabling producers to monitor stock remotely and plan deliveries more efficiently. The solution helps companies move from reactive to proactive logistics, improving delivery planning, operational efficiency and safety by reducing manual inspections. The technology is already used by major cement producers such as Holcim, Cemex and Heidelberg Materials and is deployed across more than 30 countries worldwide.
TotalEnergies and Holcim have commissioned a floating solar power plant in Obourg, Belgium, built on a rehabilitated former chalk quarry that has been converted into a lake. The project has a generation capacity of 31 MW and produces around 30 GWh of renewable electricity annually, which will be used to power Holcim’s nearby industrial operations. The project is currently the largest floating solar installation in Europe dedicated entirely to industrial self-consumption. To ensure minimal impact on the surrounding landscape, more than 700 metres of horizontal directional drilling were used to connect the solar installation to the electrical substation. The project reflects ongoing collaboration between the two companies to support industrial decarbonisation through renewable energy solutions and innovative infrastructure development.