Adani Cement is playing an instrumental role in responsible energy management in the Indian industrial sector. Here’s looking at their comprehensive efforts at sourcing alternative fuel and energy and optimising energy consumption in the cement manufacturing process.
Cement production stands as a prime example of an energy-intensive industry, where the role of energy is paramount in shaping both production costs and sustainability efforts. One essential application of energy is in the transformation of raw materials, including limestone and additives, into clinker. This heat-intensive process is fundamental to cement production. Electricity plays a critical role in various phases of manufacturing. From grinding raw materials to achieving the final cement product, electricity consumption ranges between 56 to 73 kWh per metric tonne. Notably, the stages of raw material grinding, kiln operation and cement grinding contribute a significant 75-80 per cent to the overall electrical energy consumption. Our dependence on energy is underscored by the consumption of fuels. For our 3 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) kilns, the daily consumption of fuels fluctuates between 1200 to 1600 tonnes. This sizeable amount of fuel is a prerequisite for sustaining our production operations. The electricity requirements are equally substantial. It surpasses 70 units of electricity per tonne of cement produced, encompassing the entire manufacturing cycle. However, we are committed to enhancing our energy efficiency. Our efforts include ongoing initiatives to optimise existing installations and systems. Notable investments have been directed toward activities like cooler replacement, burner upgrades, and the incorporation of advanced thin liners in the cement mill. Several of these initiatives have already been implemented, underscoring our dedication to improved energy management.
Diverse Energy Sources Our organisation employs a diverse array of energy sources to meet its manufacturing requirements, aligning with our commitment to sustainability and responsible energy management. At the heart of our production process, primary heat comes from fossil fuels, which are pivotal in the clinkering stage of cement manufacturing. We are progressively integrating alternative fuels, and we have set a robust roadmap to escalate this figure from present 7 per cent to 25 per cent. In terms of electrical energy, we draw power from both our captive/thermal power plant and the state grid to ensure a reliable supply. Our emphasis on green energy is a cornerstone of our energy strategy. Solar energy plays a significant role as we harness its power through solar panels to contribute substantially to our electricity requirements. Additionally, wind energy further enriches our energy mix, tapping into wind turbines’ potential. Leveraging waste heat recovery systems (WHRS), we are innovatively converting waste heat from our processes into usable energy, thereby reducing waste and optimising energy utilisation.
Sourcing Energy Sustainably Our energy sourcing strategy is a comprehensive blend of primary and secondary sources, underscoring our dedication to both sustainability and efficiency. In the pivotal clinkering phase of cement production, our primary heat source encompasses a mixture of fossil and alternative fuels. We engage in co-processing alternative fuels in our cement kilns. This includes a diverse spectrum of waste materials, like hazardous and non-hazardous waste from industrial processes, segregated municipal waste sourced from both fresh and legacy sites, as well as biomass like rice husk, soya husk and tuar husk. This innovative stride not only optimises energy use but also significantly contributes to conservation of natural resources and reduction of CO2 emissions. Currently, around 7 per cent of our total heat requirement is met through alternative fuels, and our roadmap outlines a determined path to elevate this ratio to 25 per cent, aligning seamlessly with our mission to curtail environmental impact and foster sustainable practices. Our energy strategy embraces the robust use of green energy, comprising of solar, wind and WHRS. We are steadfastly working towards elevating both solar and WHRS contributions to at least 40 per cent of our total electricity demand. All these initiatives serve as a testament to our unwavering commitment to responsible energy management and the stewardship of our environment.
Impact on Cost The introduction of greener sources of electricity has had a negligible impact on our operations, whereas the influence is more nuanced in the context of our primary energy source, specifically heat generation. For instance, incorporating even a minor proportion of 1 per cent alternative fuel in clinker manufacturing could marginally increase thermal energy by approximately 1-1.5 kcal per kg clinker. It is important to note that this effect might not hold true for alternative fuels like dry biomass due to their distinct characteristics. However, our kiln system is equipped with inherent capabilities designed to mitigate such impacts, ensuring a balanced approach. Considering the inherent volatility of fuel prices, the increased integration of green energy into our processes yields a significant advantage in terms of reducing the overall cost of cement production. By relying more on these sustainable sources, we can potentially mitigate the financial fluctuations associated with traditional fuel sources, leading to more stable and predictable production costs.
Optimising the Use of Energy Automation and technology play an instrumental role in optimising energy utilisation within cement plants. These advancements contribute to enhanced productivity and heightened system reliability, creating a stable manufacturing environment. The harmonious synergy between automation and technology facilitates the most efficient allocation of energy resources, minimising wastage and enhancing overall energy efficiency. In line with this, we have implemented High-Level Control (HLC) systems for each kiln and cement mill circuit. These technologies not only streamline operations but also empower us to respond proactively to energy consumption patterns, driving us closer to our efficiency and sustainability goals.
Hurdles along the Way The availability of fuels, particularly coal and petcoke, presents a significant challenge due to factors such as supply constraints and the volatility of their prices. This unpredictability in fuel availability and costs can impact the stability of our operations and cost structures. Additionally, the limited quantity of linkage coal further exacerbates this challenge, necessitating careful resource management and exploring alternative options. Another notable challenge arises from the non-uniform regulatory procedures governing the utilisation of renewable power sources, namely solar and wind energy. The intricacies of these regulations vary geographically. This disparity introduces complexities in adopting renewable energy solutions consistently across regions, potentially impeding a streamlined transition to cleaner energy sources. Overcoming these regulatory hurdles demands strategic coordination and harmonisation of policies to ensure a more cohesive and efficient integration of renewable energy into our operations.
Compliance and Regulations Effective energy management is a fundamental aspect of our operations, supported by well-established systems and dedicated professionals. Certified energy managers are stationed at each of our locations, underscoring our commitment to optimal energy utilisation and sustainability. Regular energy audits are a crucial part of our practices, with each site undergoing thorough assessments. The insights derived from these audits inform actionable plans that are diligently tracked and implemented to enhance energy efficiency. Furthermore, our commitment to responsible energy management is evident through our collaboration with the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE). We actively share data on both electrical and thermal energy consumption with the BEE, aligning with the regulations and objectives of the Perform Achieve and Trade (PAT) programme. This proactive approach reinforces our dedication to not only internal efficiency but also broader national energy goals. Adhering to the ‘golden rule’ of energy efficiency improvement, we place stringent monitoring and controls in place. This ensures that our energy management strategies remain dynamic and responsive, adapting to changes and consistently driving efficiency enhancements. Our comprehensive approach to energy management is a testament to our commitment to sustainable practices, cost optimisation and environmental responsibility. We employ an internal digital dashboard to meticulously track daily energy consumption encompassing both heat and electricity. However, the benchmarking of thermal and electrical energy utilisation occurs monthly, both within our organisation and within the broader external context. This practice culminates in the acknowledgment of exceptional accomplishments by the most improved plant team through internal commendations and accolades. Furthermore, our commitment to optimal energy utilisation is evidenced by annual external energy audits. These audits serve as a comprehensive evaluation of our energy practices, ensuring alignment with stringent standards. The resulting action plan, aimed at continuous enhancement, undergoes a rigorous assessment every three months. This iterative approach underscores our unwavering dedication to refining energy efficiency and reinforcing our sustainable commitments.
Conclusion In the context of the cement industry, driving advancements in energy consumption is imperative. Regarding heat, it is essential to harness technological progress to curtail energy usage. Shifting the focus to electricity consumption, the installation of green energy sources like solar, wind and WRHS stand out as a promising approach. Further, by enhancing overall efficiency of individual components, striving to minimise the impact of fluctuations in process parameters collectively hold the potential to revolutionise energy consumption within the cement industry, driving it towards a more sustainable and efficient future. (Communication by the management of the company)
Indian Cement Review (ICR) and Fuller Technologies brought industry, policy and technology leaders together to discuss how cement innovation can drive green construction at scale, writes Rakesh Rao.
India is building at a pace few countries can match. Highways, airports, housing, logistics parks, industrial corridors and urban infrastructure are reshaping the country’s economic geography. But beneath this growth story lies a difficult question: can India continue to build at scale without locking itself into a high-carbon future?
That question formed the core of an online panel discussion titled “Driving Green Construction Through Cement Innovation”, organised by Indian Cement Review (ICR) in association with Fuller Technologies as the Presenting Partner on June 25, 2026. The webinar brought together experts from cement technology, R&D, global industry platforms, building performance policy and international development cooperation to examine how low-carbon cement and material innovation can accelerate India’s green construction transition.
The discussion came at a crucial time. India has committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2070 and reducing the carbon intensity of its economy by 45 per cent by 2030. At the same time, the country’s construction sector is expanding rapidly, driven by urbanisation, infrastructure development, housing demand and industrial growth. Cement, as one of the most widely used construction materials, sits at the heart of this transition. It is indispensable to development, but also central to the challenge of reducing embodied carbon in buildings and infrastructure.
Moderated by Nitika Krishan, Senior Urban Infrastructure and Sustainable Policy Consultant, the panel featured:
Dr Hemantkumar Aiyer, VP and Head R&D, Nuvoco Vistas Corp Ltd;
Devika Wattal, Innovation Lead, Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA);
Dr Sunita Purushottam, MD, GBPN India (Global Buildings Performance Network); and
Vaibhav Rathi, Senior Technical Advisor, GIZ (the German Agency for International Cooperation)
Setting the tone for the discussion, Nitika Krishan underlined the scale of the challenge before the sector. “The question before us is no longer whether we build, but how we build sustainably,” she said. She pointed out that construction accounts for nearly 40 per cent of global energy-related carbon emissions when both operational and embodied carbon are considered. Cement production, she added, remains one of the hardest industrial processes to decarbonise.
For India, this is not merely an environmental issue. It is a development issue, a competitiveness issue and increasingly, a market issue. As one of the world’s largest cement producers and among the fastest-growing construction markets, India’s material choices will influence the carbon trajectory of its built environment for decades. As Krishan observed, sustainability solutions in economies such as India must not remain limited to laboratory success. They must be scalable, commercially viable and practical at national level.
The innovation gap: From technology to market
Experts believe that there is a need to bridge the innovation gaps for making decarbonisation in cement and concrete scalable. Devika Wattal of GCCA, explained, “The starting point must be the core cement manufacturing process itself. The first and foremost is the heart of our process, the heart of cement manufacturing. How do we reduce clinker? That is always a topic where industry is working very intrinsically.”
Clinker reduction remains one of the most important pathways for lowering emissions in cement. Since clinker production is energy-intensive and chemically emits carbon dioxide, reducing the clinker factor through supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), blended cements and new chemistries can have a significant impact. Wattal also noted that carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) will have a role, though it may not be the first lever for all markets.
However, she stressed that innovation cannot stop at technology development. A solution that works in the lab must also be adaptable to industry, scalable in production and acceptable in construction practice. “It is important for that innovation to be adaptable, to be scalable, and so that it can be executed in real time,” she said.
Wattal also called for stronger enabling systems around innovation. These include performance-based standards, product-level embodied carbon databases and clearer frameworks for evaluating green materials. Without these, low-carbon cement products may struggle to compete with conventional materials in procurement and design.
R&D must balance carbon, cost and performance
Bringing in the R&D perspective into the discussion, Dr Hemantkumar Aiyer of Nuvoco Vistas emphasised that low-carbon cement development cannot be treated as a single-variable exercise. Cement must perform in real construction conditions. It must deliver strength, durability, consistency and cost competitiveness, while also reducing carbon.
“The root of understanding and balancing all these aspects lies in materials, and knowing the materials,” he said.
According to Dr Aiyer, R&D teams must understand the variability of raw materials such as fly ash, slag and clinker. Different sources produce different material behaviours. This makes mix optimisation, material characterisation and processing-property relationships critical. When performance is affected, cement manufacturers must understand how strength enhancers, admixtures and other performance chemicals interact with the material system.
He also linked material science with process efficiency. Clinkerisation takes place at extremely high temperatures, around 1,400 to 1,450 degrees Celsius. Any improvement in raw mix design, process control or energy optimisation can, therefore, help reduce emissions and cost. Dr Aiyer pointed to artificial intelligence-based optimisation, Cement 4.0 tools and advanced software as important enablers for real-time process and material control.
“The more you understand the materials, the more you can control it,” he said.
LC3: The promise is proven, the sequencing is not
Limestone calcined clay cement, commonly referred to as LC3, has attracted global attention because it can reduce clinker content significantly by using calcined clay and limestone while maintaining performance in many applications. Kiranmai Sanagavarapu of Fuller Technologies said the technology itself has already moved beyond proof of concept. Fuller Technologies has worked with calcined clay technology for nearly two decades and has seen plants running in France and Ghana. These plants, she said, are meeting local and national specifications, while the economics are beginning to make sense.
“The calciner is performing, the economics is stacking up, it is making business sense to produce,” she said.
But if the technology is viable, why has adoption not scaled faster? For Sanagavarapu, the answer lies in project sequencing. Too often, clay characterisation happens after equipment is specified. This, she warned, is a backward approach because calciner design depends on clay mineralogy, kaolinite content, iron levels, reactivity, moisture and other variables.
“If you don’t know what your deposit looks like before you commit for the equipment, you are, in a way, going blind into designing,” she said.
She also identified permitting and plant integration as major bottlenecks. Environmental clearances, mining permissions and local regulatory approvals must begin early. Similarly, calcined clay must be integrated into existing grinding, blending and logistics systems from the design stage, not treated as an afterthought during commissioning.
India already has IS 18189:2023 standard for LC3, but Sanagavarapu pointed out that the standard is not yet visible enough in procurement documents. “The gap between what is technically being permitted and what the procurement is asking is the single biggest bottleneck,” she said.
In her view, successful scale-up depends on getting the sequence right: clay characterisation first, permitting in parallel, standards aligned with construction, and integration built into plant design.
India’s LC3 journey: Progress, but demand remains thin
Providing details of India’s LC3 commercialisation experience, Vaibhav Rathi of GIZ noted that JK Cement carried out the first commercial production of LC3 at its Rajasthan plant, followed by JK Lakshmi Cement three months later. These initiatives were supported by the International Climate Initiative of the Government of Germany, with IIT Delhi contributing deep institutional knowledge on LC3 research and BIS certification.
Rathi said India’s early experience has produced clear lessons. One of the biggest was the need to build capacity among regulators. While BIS certification existed, State Pollution Control Boards were unfamiliar with the technology and unsure about the approval pathway.
“The capacity building is not just needed amongst the producer and the users of the cement, but also the regulators who are working with this technology for the first time,” he said.
He also highlighted the need for better information on China clay deposits. Since China clay is currently classified as a minor mineral, centralised data on availability, quality and location is limited. If cement manufacturers are to adopt LC3 at scale, stronger mineral intelligence will be important.
The third issue is demand. LC3 has already been used in projects such as Palava City in Mumbai and Noida International Airport, but these remain limited examples. “It is in a chicken and egg situation,” Rathi said. “Cement companies are saying we need more demand, and users are saying there is not enough cement available.”
Public procurement, he suggested, could help break this cycle. If agencies such as CPWD and other public bodies begin testing, accepting and specifying LC3, it could create the market confidence needed for cement companies to invest in production and storage.
Building codes must catch up with innovation
Dr Sunita Purushottam of GBPN India argued that material choices will determine built environment emissions over the long term, but India’s current policy signals remain fragmented. Although LC3 has received BIS recognition, she pointed out that building codes, municipal bylaws, schedules of rates and sustainability codes do not yet provide uniform guidance on low-carbon cement.
“The current cement regulations are largely prescriptive and favouring traditional materials,” she said. This limits the ability of alternative materials to compete on performance, durability and emissions.
Dr Purushottam also raised the issue of taxation. Cement, including LC3, currently falls under the same GST bracket as conventional cement. A differentiated tax structure, she argued, could help accelerate market adoption. “In order for the market to demand LC3, that differentiation in the GST could go a long way,” she said.
She noted that green building certifications such as IGBC and GRIHA are already creating demand for low-carbon materials by assigning points for embodied carbon and sustainable material use. However, she said large-scale adoption will require regulatory mandates, particularly through building codes and state-level notifications.
She also cautioned that low-carbon cement alone does not solve the entire building performance problem. A material may reduce embodied carbon, but the operational carbon of a building depends on thermal performance, design, insulation and energy use. “The energy part has two elements,” she said. “One is the embodied carbon of the material itself, and the other is the operational carbon.”
Collaboration is the bridge between invention and impact
Wattal said GCCA sees innovation as a strategic priority and works through platforms that connect industry with academia and start-ups. “There is no way we will decarbonise our sector without innovation,” she said.
However, she stressed that research must be connected to actual industry challenges. Innovations developed in isolation may fail when they encounter real-world barriers such as raw material variability, plant integration, cost, standards and finance. Start-ups, too, need industry mentorship and scale-up pathways.
Wattal also flagged the importance of finance. Even strong technologies may struggle to attract investment if there is no common understanding of bankability. “We have always put projects into, is this a bankable project? But the definition of a bankable project has never been defined,” she said.
For India, she saw strong potential in its academic and start-up ecosystem, but said the challenge lies in alignment and prioritisation. The country has the research base, industrial capacity and market size. What it now needs is a coordinated route from innovation to deployment.
There is a practical concern for cement manufacturers: how can existing plants be adapted for lower emissions without compromising reliability or commercial viability?
Kiranmai Sanagavarapu addressed, “The reliability risk in calcined clay retrofit is definitely real, but it is almost always self-inflicted. The risk arises when a new process is added to an existing circuit without properly redesigning grinding and blending configurations.”
Existing cement plants, she explained, can take two broad routes. The first is external sourcing of calcined clay combined with mill optimisation. This requires lower capital investment and can potentially move in 12 to 18 months if other conditions are in place. It may reduce emissions by around 20 to 30 per cent. The second route is integrated calcination on site, which requires higher capital expenditure and longer lead times, but provides greater control over quality, supply and emissions reduction potential.
For Sanagavarapu, the principle is simple: low-carbon retrofits must be designed with intent. “Design it with an intent properly from the start. Start in the market conditions where the economics are already working,” she said.
Circularity: The overlooked advantage
According to Vaibhav Rathi, fly ash and slag are already well established in cement and construction (C&D), but construction and demolition waste remains underutilised. “C&D waste is a growing business opportunity which not many have taken up,” he said. India’s continuous construction and demolition activity creates huge volumes of waste, much of which contributes to air pollution, land degradation and material inefficiency. With the right processing and standards, this waste can be converted into useful construction products.
Rathi also pointed out that LC3 has a circular economy dimension that is often overlooked. It can use low-grade kaolin-rich clay left behind after high-grade clay is extracted for other applications. “LC3 is not only a low-carbon solution, but also a circular economy solution,” he said.
At the same time, he cautioned that LC3 in India is not yet cheap because it has not reached scale. Site-specific techno-commercial feasibility studies, supported jointly by development agencies and industry, could help companies assess whether LC3 production makes technical and financial sense at a given location.
Dr Purushottam added that India must address both low-carbon cement and construction waste together. “Both low-carbon cement and C&D waste go hand in hand. India does not have an option but to work on both,” she said.
Dr Aiyer called for policy shifts from both government and industry, including preferential purchasing of sustainable materials, minimum supplementary cementitious material requirements in public and public-private projects, and faster regulatory implementation. “If we can fast-track the regulatory standards and their implementation on the ground, that is the way to go,” he said.
From green ambition to green construction
Cement innovation is no longer only about chemistry. It is about systems. Low-carbon cement will scale only when technology, standards, procurement, finance, regulation, education and construction practice move together.
LC3 and other low-carbon technologies have shown promise. India has early commercial examples, strong research capability and growing market interest. But mainstream adoption will depend on whether demand can be created, regulators can be capacitated, standards can be embedded in procurement, and manufacturers can see a clear business case.
For a country building at India’s scale, the opportunity is enormous. Cement will continue to be central to infrastructure and urban development. The challenge now is to ensure that the cement used in India’s growth story carries a lower carbon burden.
Rakesh Rao
Participate in Cement Expo 2026 and discover how next-gen infrastructure can be built with innovations in cement.
JK Cement gained after being declared preferred bidder for the Gilund Limestone Block in Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, a lease area of 370.96 hectares. The firm saw its shares trade at Rs. 5550.05, up by 28.45 points or 0.52 per cent from the previous close of Rs. 5521.60 on the BSE. The scrip opened at Rs. 5569.15 and touched a high of Rs. 5625.00 and a low of Rs. 5531.00.
The stock recorded turnover of 1742 shares on the counter and the BSE group A stock with face value Rs. 10 has a 52 week high of Rs. 7565.00 on 20-Aug-2025 and a 52 week low of Rs. 4670.05 on 12-Jun-2026. Last one week high and low stood at Rs. 5625.00 and Rs. 5329.00 respectively. The promoters holding in the company stood at 45.66 per cent, while institutions and non-institutions held 40.61 per cent and 13.73 per cent respectively.
The e-auction conducted by the Government of Rajasthan resulted in the company being declared preferred bidder for the mining lease, and the allocation will enable the company to plan phased development of the deposit, subject to regulatory approvals. The Gilund block spans 370.96 hectares and its allocation is intended to support raw material security for the company’s cement operations in the region. The designation follows the government auction process and will allow the company to plan development and integration of the deposit into its supply chain.
The current market capitalisation stands at Rs. 430.38 billion (bn), reflecting market response to the mining news and prevailing valuation levels for the sector. Investors and analysts will watch for formal allotment and related disclosures that can clarify timelines, capital expenditure and expected production profiles. The report is intended for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice, and market participants are advised to consult advisers before making decisions.
Star Cement has been declared the preferred bidder for the mining lease for Boro Lakhindong West Block following e-auctions conducted by the Government of Assam. The block is located in Boro Lakhindong Village, Umrangso Tehsil, Dima Hasao District, Assam, and extends over an area of 123 hectares. The estimated limestone resource is 207.822 million (mn) tonnes (t), a quantity that will supply raw material for cement production and support the company’s manufacturing operations in the region.
The company is engaged in the manufacturing and selling of cement clinker and cement and distributes products across the north-eastern and eastern states of India. Star Cement operates plants and logistics networks that procure and process limestone to produce clinker for cement, and the addition of Boro Lakhindong is presented as a strategic enhancement of feedstock availability. The preferred bidder status secures rights to the specified lease area under the terms of the auction process.
Financial results for the company in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2026 showed a consolidated net profit rise of 20.24 per cent to Rs 1,481.0 mn on an 11.54 per cent increase in revenue to Rs 11,735.5 mn compared with the corresponding quarter of the previous year. Those results reflected higher sales volumes and revenue growth in the company’s primary markets and are cited in company disclosures accompanying the lease announcement. The reported performance provides context to the company’s ability to pursue and finance new mining lease opportunities.
Market reaction to the declaration was modest, with the scrip rising zero point thirty six per cent to trade at Rs 212 on the BSE. The award of the Boro Lakhindong lease concludes the e-auction process for the west block and assigns operational rights to Star Cement as the preferred bidder, subject to completion of statutory and contractual formalities.
