RP Gupta, Chairman and Managing Director, Shiva Cement.
New capacity additions are becoming difficult due to regulatory hurdles in land acquisition, mining leases and environmental approval, says RP Gupta, Chairman and Managing Director, Shiva Cement. In an exclusive chat with ICR, he elaborates on the company’s expansion drive. Excerpts from the interview.
Could you throw more light on the current expansion plan, Phase I and Phase II? We had signed MOU with the Odisha government for expanding plant capacity up to 2.6 mtpa with an investment upto Rs. 800 crore in two phases. Currently, Phase I plan is under implementation up to 1 mtpa with a capital outlay of Rs. 270 crore. Commercial production of Phase 1 is likely to commence from Jan 2015 and thereafter Phase 2 expansion shall be taken up.
What will be the total investment and how do you plan to raise the capital? Phase 1 shall be financed through a debt of Rs 170 crore and balance by equity and cash accruals. The lead bank has already sanctioned term loan of Rs 70 crore. Consortium members are in the process of sanction of balance 100 crore which will be completed by 1st week of July. Promoters have already brought in about Rs 30 crore.
Will ACC be taking more shares in SCL and how it is going to help its shareholders? ACC has nominated directors in SCL’s Board and the total production of cement is marketed under ACC brand. They also provide technical and managerial guidance. Equity participation by ACC shall be negotiated only after sanction of loan. Shareholders shall be certainly benefited after expansion out of increased volume and efficiency. Several surplus assets shall be put to productive use after expansion.
What is your take on the current demand-supply mismatch? In the recent past, substantial capacity was added in the country in anticipation of growth in demand. Unfortunately, demand is sluggish due to the slowdown in infrastructure and economy as a whole. However, such cyclical effects have been witnessed in the past also. Cement industry being a core sector, the medium and long- term view should be taken, which is certainly promising. Demand growth will certainly bounce back and excess capacity shall bottom out in the next two years. New capacity additions are becoming difficult due to regulatory hurdles in land acquisition, mining leases and environmental approval. If these issues are not addressed, it can create huge shortage and price hike, which is otherwise not desirable. It is understood that the domestic players do not enjoy a level playing field vis- a- vis global players, especially when it comes to import of cement. Yes. Input costs like fuel, energy and logistics cost is high in India, as compared to several other countries. All these are directly/indirectly controlled by the government. Yet India will always remain a net exporter of cement and clinker. The Indian cement industry is quite matured and adopting the latest technology in a quick manner. But the real worry is paucity of fuel and energy. We must liberalise the primary energy sector and create competition for improving supply with affordable cost and reducing dependency on imported energy. Competition is also needed in the secondary energy distribution and cross subsidy to be removed. Otherwise, the cement price will keep on spiralling.
Brief us on the steps you have taken to optimise fuel/energy efficiency. Saving fuel and energy is most vital not only for the profitability but also for addressing environmental concerns. After expansion, our fuel and energy consumption-per-tonne of cement shall be much lower than the industry average due to adoption of latest technology.
Where does the company see itself five years down the line, in terms of reducing its carbon footprints? After expansion, carbon emission per tonne of cement in SCL could be lower by about 40 per cent in comparison to industry average due to saving in fuel, energy and limestone consumption. The major reduction will be on the account of lowering clinker consumption through latest technologies.
How do you assess the challenges on the logistics front? Logistics costs in our country are too high. Inadequate capacity in railway aggravates the problem for long- distance despatches of bulky product like cement, coal and minerals. Fortunately, our plant is located in the vicinity of market and raw material source. Therefore dependency upon rail despatch is quite low which provides us with an edge over other. However, in the larger interest of the country, we must transfer goods traffic from road to railway for cost- efficiency and reducing burden of imported energy. This needs a major restructuring of railway and augmenting investment of Rs.12 lakh crore in 12th Plan as against 2.6 lakh crore in 11th Plan. Details of such restructuring and financing solution are discussed in my book æTurn Around India.’
What steps does the company take to reduce the impact on the environment? Environmental concern is one of the aspects of CSR and not the core issue, in my personal opinion. Rather, the core aspect is protecting the interest of shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers and neighbouring villagers. Environmental concern has been over politicised in our country. India’s per capita GHG emission is about 1.43 T as against world average 4.74 T. The industry’s share of GHG emission in the country is barely 21.7 per cent as against 17.6 per cent by agriculture, 10.2 per cent by domestic and 7.5 per cent by transport. It requires a separate debate while focussing on industry alone. This is elaborated in my book æTurn Around India,’ recently launched by Narendra Modi. Any growth and development is bound to damage environment; maybe in less or more proportion. We must not compromise with growth and development till our per capita income comes near to the world average and current account deficit is brought to nil. Thereafter, we should increase spending on green technology as a part of global mission. Every developed country has adopted a similar strategy during their development phase. Hence, we should also take a rational approach on this front.
What is your take on the usage of AFR? Currently, we are not working seriously on alternative fuel, since our plant is located in the coal belt. However, some trials were conducted on the use of CHAR, a waste product of sponge kilns. It needs extensive study before putting into commercial use.
Brief us on the challenges faced by the cement industry today. How has SCL been able to sustain the growth momentum? The immediate challenge is sluggish demand but it is a temporary phenomenon. The regular challenge will be escalating cost of fuel and energy for which we have taken adequate care in our expansion plan to reduce consumption. Another challenge is logistics cost and shortage of railway rakes arising due to lack of investment in railway and cross subsidy on goods freight. Fortunately, this is converted to our advantage due to market vicinity. But these issues need a pro-active policy for public interest.
In a very intense competitive market, what makes SCL different? The core strength of SCL owns limestone mines. Existing integrated cement plants in this region do not have surplus limestone to expand the capacity and there are no virgin limestone deposits in the eastern zone. The other advantages are vicinity of market and vicinity of slag. We have adopted latest technology in the upcoming expansion with maximum use of slag which reduces production cost to significant level. Of course, our 26 years’ experience in the cement manufacturing and alliance with ACC are the added advantages.
Is there any plan to broaden the product basket? Not at present
Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology
India is simultaneously grappling with two crises: a mounting waste emergency and an urgent need to decarbonise its most carbon-intensive industries. The cement sector, the second-largest in the world and the backbone of the nation’s infrastructure ambitions, sits at the centre of both. It consumes enormous quantities of fossil fuel, and it has the technical capacity to consume something else entirely: the waste our cities cannot get rid of.
According to CPCB and NITI Aayog projections, India generates approximately 62.4 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with that figure expected to reach 165 million tonnes by 2030. Much of this waste is energy-rich and non-recyclable. At the same time, cement kilns operate at material temperatures of approximately 1,450 degrees Celsius, with gas temperatures reaching 2,000 degrees. This high-temperature environment is ideal for co-processing, ensuring the complete thermal destruction of organic compounds without generating toxic residues. The physics are in our favour. The infrastructure is not.
Pre-processing is not the support act for co-processing. It is the main event. Get the particle size wrong, get the moisture wrong, get the calorific value wrong and your kiln thermal stability will suffer the consequences.
The Regulatory Push Is Real
The Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules 2026 mandate that cement plants progressively replace solid fossil fuels with Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), starting at a 5 per cent baseline and scaling to 15 per cent within six years. NITI Aayog’s 2026 Roadmap for Cement Sector Decarbonisation targets 20 to 25 per cent Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) by 2030. Beyond compliance, every tonne of coal replaced by RDF generates measurable carbon reductions which is monetisable under India’s emerging Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). TSR is no longer a sustainability metric. It is a financial lever.
Yet our own field assessments across multiple Indian cement plants reveal a sobering reality: the primary barrier to scaling AFR adoption is not waste availability. It is the fragmented and under-engineered pre-processing ecosystem that sits between the waste and the kiln.
Why Indian Waste Is a Different Engineering Problem
Indian municipal solid waste is not the material that imported shredding equipment was designed for. Our waste streams frequently exceed 40 per cent to 50 per cent moisture content, particularly during monsoon cycles, saturated with abrasive inerts including sand, glass, and stone. Plants relying on imported OEM equipment face months of downtime awaiting proprietary spare parts. Machines built for segregated, low-moisture waste fail quickly and disrupt the entire pre-processing operation in Indian conditions.
The two most common failures we observe are what I call the biting teeth problem and the chewing teeth problem. Plants relying solely on a primary shredder reduce bulk waste to large fractions, but the output remains too coarse for stable kiln combustion. Others attempt to use a secondary shredder as a standalone unit without a primary stage to pre-size the feed, leading to catastrophic mechanical failure. When both stages are present but mismatched in throughput capacity, the system becomes a bottleneck. Achieving the 40 to 70 tonnes per hour required for meaningful coal displacement demands a precisely coordinated two-stage process.
Engineering a Made-in-India Answer
At Fornnax, our response to these challenges is grounded in one principle: Indian waste demands Indian engineering. Our systems are built around feedstock homogeneity, the holy grail of kiln stability. Consistent particle size and predictable calorific value are the foundation of stable kiln combustion. Without them, no TSR target is achievable at scale.
Our SR-MAX2500 Dual Shaft Primary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive) processes raw, baled, or loosely mixed MSW, C&I waste, bulky waste, and plastics, reducing them to approximately 150 mm fractions at throughputs of up to 40 tonnes per hour. The R-MAX 3300 Single Shaft Secondary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive), introduced in 2025, takes that primary output and produces RDF fractions in the 30 to 80 mm range at up to 30 tonnes per hour, specifically optimised for consistent kiln feeding. We have also introduced electric drive configurations under the SR-100 HD series, with capacities between 5 and 40 tonnes per hour, already operational at a leading Indian waste-processing facility.
Looking ahead, Fornnax is expanding its portfolio with the upcoming SR-MAX3600 Hydraulic Drive primary shredder at up to 70 tonnes per hour and the R-MAX2100 Hydraulic drive secondary shredder at up to 20 tonnes per hour, designed specifically for the large-scale throughput that higher TSR ambitions require.
The Investment Case Is Now
The 2070 Net-Zero target is not a distant goal for India’s cement sector. It starts today, with decisions being made on the plant floor.
The SWM Rules 2026 are already in effect, requiring cement plants to replace coal with RDF. Carbon credit markets are opening up, and coal prices are not going to get cheaper. Every tonne of coal a cement plant replaces with waste-derived fuel saves money on one side and generates carbon credit revenue on the other. Pre-processing infrastructure is no longer just a compliance requirement. It is a business investment with a measurable return.
The good news is that nothing is missing. The technology works. The waste is available in every Indian city. The government has provided the policy direction. The only thing standing between where the industry is today and where it needs to be is the commitment to build the right infrastructure.
The cement companies that move now will not just meet the regulations. They will be ahead of every competitor that waits.
About The Author
Jignesh Kundaria is the Director and CEO of Fornnax Technology. Over an experience spanning more than two decades in the recycling industry, he has established himself as one of India’s foremost voices on waste-to-fuel technology and alternative fuel infrastructure.
The World Cement Association (WCA) has announced SiloConnect as its newest associate corporate member, expanding its network of technology providers supporting digitalisation in the cement industry. SiloConnect offers smart sensor technology that provides real-time visibility of cement inventory levels at customer silos, enabling producers to monitor stock remotely and plan deliveries more efficiently. The solution helps companies move from reactive to proactive logistics, improving delivery planning, operational efficiency and safety by reducing manual inspections. The technology is already used by major cement producers such as Holcim, Cemex and Heidelberg Materials and is deployed across more than 30 countries worldwide.
TotalEnergies and Holcim have commissioned a floating solar power plant in Obourg, Belgium, built on a rehabilitated former chalk quarry that has been converted into a lake. The project has a generation capacity of 31 MW and produces around 30 GWh of renewable electricity annually, which will be used to power Holcim’s nearby industrial operations. The project is currently the largest floating solar installation in Europe dedicated entirely to industrial self-consumption. To ensure minimal impact on the surrounding landscape, more than 700 metres of horizontal directional drilling were used to connect the solar installation to the electrical substation. The project reflects ongoing collaboration between the two companies to support industrial decarbonisation through renewable energy solutions and innovative infrastructure development.