Connect with us

Concrete

Today, managing energy is a full time job

Published

on

Shares

Jamshed N Cooper, Managing Director, HeidelbergCement India Ltd. and Zuari Cement, looks at energy consumption across various areas of cement production while emphasising the need to measure energy usage in terms of consumption vis-a-vis the cost per unit.

What kind of innovations in the area of energy consumption do you wish to see in the cement industry?
In cement manufacturing process, maximum energy is consumed at the clinkering stage. Electrical energy ranges from 50 to 80 units and thermal energy ranges from 2.9 to 3.25 GigaJoule per tonne. Therefore, clinkering stage is the one that becomes the focus of attention when it comes to adopting new technologies. Cement companies are always on a lookout for energy efficient kilns that are capable of operating with a combination of fuel mix and low on energy consumption. Resultant benefit also flows in by way of low CO2 generation.

To achieve economies of scale, mass continuous production needs to be achieved. For example, a million tonne kiln in today’s time is termed as an energy guzzler. As a thumb rule, a kiln of 5500 TPD is now the entry level. The general trend is to flog kilns of 5,000 TPD to deliver 6,000 TPD at the same time keeping MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure) at maximum, one would be able to optimise energy consumption.

Significant development has happened during the years and now we have fourth generation cross bar coolers which are energy efficient. Another potential area to reduce energy is by deploying VFDs in an optimal manner. Since VFDs are costly, payback analysis on case to case basis should be taken up and replacement of direct drives to be prioritised with a goal to do away with less efficient equipment.

Post clinkering, it’s the grinding stage that consumes a good amount of electrical energy. The industry has worked upon this area and have succeeded in implementing solutions to reduce energy consumption.

At one point of time, cement grinding used to take up to 50 to 60 units of power. The latest energy efficient mills we separator are able to grind clinker consuming as low as 20 to 25 units of energy.

Deployment of vertical roller mills (VRM) and prepress roller mills have led to productivity enhancement and reduced energy consumption on per ton output.

Use of AFR (Alternative Fuel Resource), is yet another avenue available to the cement industry to reduce its thermal energy cost and reduce CO2 footprint. Although, the heat requirement for the pyro-process remains the same, energy substituted from AFR has good potential in reducing costs. Power generation from waste heat recovery (WHR). has come a long way and the cement industry has wisely adopted this technology gainfully.

The drive to reduce energy consumption by the cement industry is now compelling us to embrace digital technology. Digitalisation is fast catching up in the cement industry and is becoming the harbinger in the area of energy optimisation and reduction of CO2 footprint.

How does automation and technology help in optimising the use of energy in cement plants?
Talking about automation, earlier we used to have a significant human interface for plant operations. For example, highly skilled workmen called “Burners” were required for operating kilns. These workmen used their experienced based judgement for controlling the kiln fuel to the kiln by watching the condition of the flame. Today, all of this is controlled from the Central Control Room (CCR) using state of the art digital technology making it possible to monitor plant operations with deft accuracy and speed At HeidelbergCement, we use Px Trends – a system that gathers system data and does trend analysis based on which it provides solutions to the operators for controlling various equipment. The big data gathered over the years offers immense potential to deploy Artificial Intelligence (AI) engines and optimise various operating parameters in real time automatically. Cement manufacturing deals with large volumes of raw materials and this compromises accuracy when it comes to measurement in real time. Given the volumes processed every minute, it’s humanly not possible to regulate their flows with accuracy nor easy to predict accurately the quality of raw materials being mined. By digitalising, we have created processes and methodologies custom built by HeidelbergCement that facilitate optimisation of fuel and energy.

HeidelbergCement Group has also invested in IT companies with a long term aim to digitalise its operations and become future ready. Our Group is relentlessly working to deploy digital technology as we believe that it holds the key to a better future. Remote management of our cement mills is one such example deployed in India to achieve improved productivity and control of the processes.

What is the energy consumption in one cycle of cement manufacturing process? Which process is the most energy intensive?
On average, the electrical energy consumption for producing a tonne of cement ranges from 60 units to 90 units and is dependent on the type of cement produced and the technology deployed. In the same company, there could be multiple kilns and processes installed over different time horizons and the energy consumption for the same would not be similar. The latest technologies bank on large production lines that deliver optimal energy efficiency and would consume about 60 to 65 units.

What are the major challenges your organisation faces in managing the energy needs of the cement manufacturing process?
In today’s times and especially since the fuel prices have more than tripled, managing energy has become a fulltime job. Energy which used to constitute about 30 per cent of the manufacturing cost has now become close to 45 per cent. Therefore, managing our energy needs becomes one of the bigger challenges for us and the industry as well. HeidelbergCement has developed several ways to manage its energy needs and deploy customised systems that have been developed by the Group.

Energy consumed to manufacture a tonne of cement is measured in Kcal or Giga Joules but more relevant is how do we achieve the lowest cost per Kcal or Gj. It therefore becomes prudent to manage the fuel mix based on its landed cost at the plant. To be able to optimise the energy consumption and its cost, we constantly evaluate and keep altering our fuel recipes.

On one hand is the cost of various fuels and on the other is its consumption. In the cement manufacturing process, a lot of heat is lost if thermal radiation is not contained. “Heat Contained is Heat Saved”. Periodic and astute maintenance schedules not only hold the key to improve plant availability but go a long way in reducing energy consumption.

We constantly endeavor to replace fossil fuels with AFR and maximise power generation from WHR. Replacing high cost grid power with low cost renewable power such as solar and wind have remained in sharp focus for HeidelbergCement India. Over a period of the last few years, we have been able to reduce our energy consumption by upgrading the plant and machinery in our plants.

How does energy conservation impact the profitability of the organisation? What impact does it have on the productivity of the process?
As I mentioned, reduction in energy consumption results in reduction of manufacturing costs as well and adds to the bottom line. Replacing high cost conventional energy sources with WHR and low renewable energy sources helps us save enough to be able to invest and adapt to newer technologies. It’s a self-fulfilling cycle that improves the competitive advantage which in the Indian context is a necessity for survival and growth.

Productivity and Energy efficiency go hand in hand and every employee in our organisation understands this. Drop in productivity of any equipment gets reflected in terms of higher energy consumption per unit of cement produced. For example, a kiln of 5,000 TPD if operated to deliver an output of 5800 TPD clinker, the incremental energy requirement will be marginally higher in relation to the energy consumed when operated at 5000 TPD.

With oil prices shooting through the roof, what has been its impact on the cement industry?
Escalated fuel cost has dealt a severe blow to the cement industry. Fuel related costs have added the most to our woes. The costs have gone up by 20 per cent to 30 per cent during the last two years and continue to rise unabated. Due to overhang of capacity and intense competition, the cement industry has not been able to pass on the price increases to the consumers.

In December 2020, pet coke prices were about $50 per tonne. Today the same is close to US$ 220 which makes the increase 3x of what it was. Today imported coal is hovering in the range of US$195 to $200 per tonne. Looking at the geopolitical situation and the state of economies across the globe, it does not seem that fuel prices would relent much in the coming year or so.

While industry continues to strive and contain its costs by deploying efficient technologies, it has its limitations. The cost savings thus achieved fall significantly short when it comes to matching the pace at which raw material costs have been increasing.

The recent past declared quarterly financial results of cement companies, makes it obvious that if the industry fails to pass on the cost increases to the customers, it could have a debilitating effect on the foreseeable future of the industry.

What are the major compliances and standards for efficiently handling fuel and energy in the organisation?
The statutory compliances to be fulfilled by cement manufacturers are well defined by the respective Government agencies. When it comes to improving energy efficiencies, we have to achieve the targets under the PAT cycle. We have been witnessing over the years as to how the PAT cycle has shaped the industry’s approach to becoming energy efficient.

A few of the environmental compliances in India are more stringent than those applicable in developed economies. Nevertheless, the Indian Cement Manufacturers have time and again demonstrated their commitment to meet all the norms and standards laid down by the MoEF. As a good corporate citizen, we at HeidelbergCement take pride in ensuring total compliance with the laws of the land and the industry.

How often are audits done to ensure optimum use of energy and what is the suggested duration for the same?
We undertake all requisite audits periodically and file our reports as required under the law. As a responsible corporate, we do our own energy audits as well.

We believe in the philosophy of “Continuous Improvement”. Besides our internal standards, we benchmark our performance with our past best achievements and also that of our competitors and replicate the same. We strive to become better than the previous year.

At our India operations, we pursue a target to achieve a two-degree lower ambient temperature in our plants compared to than prevailing a Km away.

This journey we commenced in 2014 and now two of our cement plants have achieved the goal and the remaining ones are close to emerging winners. The average reduction for all our units operating in India now stands at 1.4 degree Celsius lower. This act of ours has led to creation of a cooler work environment and is resulting in higher productivity.

How have been the carbon emission norms for the cement industry in India vis-à-vis the World? What percentage of your carbon emission reduction target are you set to achieve by 2030?
The CO2 emission by the cement industry worldwide in 2018-19 reduced to 640 kg per tonne of cement from 760 kg per tonne in 1990 thereby recording a significant reduction of 16 per cent. At our India operations, we take pride in having achieved 585 kg CO2 per tonne of cement in 2018-19 from a level of 800 kg per tonne in 1990.

During FY 2021, CO2 emissions for our India operations stood at 570 kg per tonne of cement and now we strive to further reduce it to 550 kg by 2025. By 2030, we have the ambition to touch 534 kg CO2. In Central India, we manufacture 100 per cent blended cement with a CO2 footprint of 510 kg per tonne of cement pursuing a target to further reduce it to 495 kg by 2030. The group is pushing us to achieve this target and compete at Global levels.

CO2 emissions while manufacturing Cement is inevitable. When we say that we are going to achieve carbon neutrality, it implies that going forward deploying carbon capture or utilisation will come into play.

HeidelbergCement Group is poised to emerge as a pioneer in the cement industry as it continues to build the first of its king state of art carbon capture units in Norway. A delegation comprising members of DPIIT and NCCBM, visited the establishment to witness the same.

HeidelbergCement Group is working on close to eight carbon capture technologies which are at various Technological Readiness Levels (TRLs).

These include processes like post combustion, oxy fuel, lilac technology, direct separation, micro algae, hydrogen burning and kiln electrification. These pioneering efforts of our Group are poised to become a boon for the cement industry and the society as well.

Our slogan “Materials to Build Our Future” energises us day after day to renew our commitment to “making the world a wonderful place to live for our generations to come”.

Concrete

JK Cement Declared Preferred Bidder For Gilund Limestone Block

Shares Edge Higher As Company Wins Rajasthan Block

Published

on

By

Shares



JK Cement gained after being declared preferred bidder for the Gilund Limestone Block in Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, a lease area of 370.96 hectares. The firm saw its shares trade at Rs. 5550.05, up by 28.45 points or 0.52 per cent from the previous close of Rs. 5521.60 on the BSE. The scrip opened at Rs. 5569.15 and touched a high of Rs. 5625.00 and a low of Rs. 5531.00.

The stock recorded turnover of 1742 shares on the counter and the BSE group A stock with face value Rs. 10 has a 52 week high of Rs. 7565.00 on 20-Aug-2025 and a 52 week low of Rs. 4670.05 on 12-Jun-2026. Last one week high and low stood at Rs. 5625.00 and Rs. 5329.00 respectively. The promoters holding in the company stood at 45.66 per cent, while institutions and non-institutions held 40.61 per cent and 13.73 per cent respectively.

The e-auction conducted by the Government of Rajasthan resulted in the company being declared preferred bidder for the mining lease, and the allocation will enable the company to plan phased development of the deposit, subject to regulatory approvals. The Gilund block spans 370.96 hectares and its allocation is intended to support raw material security for the company’s cement operations in the region. The designation follows the government auction process and will allow the company to plan development and integration of the deposit into its supply chain.

The current market capitalisation stands at Rs. 430.38 billion (bn), reflecting market response to the mining news and prevailing valuation levels for the sector. Investors and analysts will watch for formal allotment and related disclosures that can clarify timelines, capital expenditure and expected production profiles. The report is intended for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice, and market participants are advised to consult advisers before making decisions.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Star Cement Named Preferred Bidder For Boro Lakhindong Block

Preferred bidder for limestone mining lease in Assam

Published

on

By

Shares



Star Cement has been declared the preferred bidder for the mining lease for Boro Lakhindong West Block following e-auctions conducted by the Government of Assam. The block is located in Boro Lakhindong Village, Umrangso Tehsil, Dima Hasao District, Assam, and extends over an area of 123 hectares. The estimated limestone resource is 207.822 million (mn) tonnes (t), a quantity that will supply raw material for cement production and support the company’s manufacturing operations in the region.

The company is engaged in the manufacturing and selling of cement clinker and cement and distributes products across the north-eastern and eastern states of India. Star Cement operates plants and logistics networks that procure and process limestone to produce clinker for cement, and the addition of Boro Lakhindong is presented as a strategic enhancement of feedstock availability. The preferred bidder status secures rights to the specified lease area under the terms of the auction process.

Financial results for the company in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2026 showed a consolidated net profit rise of 20.24 per cent to Rs 1,481.0 mn on an 11.54 per cent increase in revenue to Rs 11,735.5 mn compared with the corresponding quarter of the previous year. Those results reflected higher sales volumes and revenue growth in the company’s primary markets and are cited in company disclosures accompanying the lease announcement. The reported performance provides context to the company’s ability to pursue and finance new mining lease opportunities.

Market reaction to the declaration was modest, with the scrip rising zero point thirty six per cent to trade at Rs 212 on the BSE. The award of the Boro Lakhindong lease concludes the e-auction process for the west block and assigns operational rights to Star Cement as the preferred bidder, subject to completion of statutory and contractual formalities.

Continue Reading

Concrete

KERC Proposal To Cut Rooftop Solar Export Tariff Raises Concern

Consumers and advocates urge regulator to reconsider change

Published

on

By

Shares



The Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) has proposed a reduction in the tariff paid for surplus electricity that rooftop solar installations export to the grid, prompting concern among consumers, renewable energy advocates and industry specialists. The proposal arrives while the Central government and state governments are promoting clean energy adoption and offering subsidy schemes to encourage rooftop solar deployment. Thousands of households in Karnataka, particularly in Bengaluru, have invested substantial sums in rooftop systems to reduce reliance on conventional power and support state renewable targets.

Stakeholders have raised questions about the implications of a lower export tariff for the financial attractiveness of rooftop solar investments and the pace of the state transition to renewables. Industry analysts warned that a reduction in compensation for excess generation could discourage new installations and extend payback periods for existing systems. Current messaging from authorities, which simultaneously promotes adoption while proposing lower export rates, has been described by user groups as creating contradictory signals for consumers.

Experts argued that policy measures should focus on grid modernisation rather than reducing consumer benefits, with investments in transmission and distribution networks needed to manage higher volumes of distributed solar generation. Consumer groups and renewable advocates are preparing written submissions to the regulator and are urging retention of incentives that support household adoption of rooftop systems. KERC has invited public objections and suggestions as part of a consultation process that will determine the final tariff framework.

The outcome of the consultation is expected to influence the future growth of rooftop solar across the state and shape investor confidence in small-scale renewable projects. Residents who have already installed rooftop panels are monitoring developments closely because changes to compensation mechanisms may affect household finances and the speed of return on investment. Observers noted that coherent policy, aligned incentives and grid upgrades would be essential to sustain momentum in the rooftop solar sector.

Continue Reading

Video Thumbnail

    SIGN-UP FOR OUR GENERAL NEWSLETTER


    Trending News

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

     

    Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

     


      This will close in 0 seconds