Gypsum is the most essential ingredient of the finished cement. Though useful, handling of gypsum in a cement plant is not so easy since it is a hygroscopic material and very sticky in nature.
The terms cement and concrete are used interchangeably, although cement is actually an ingredient of concrete; gypsum is often added to cement to slow down the setting (hardens) time. Cement sets quickly and retarding that process allows workers to pour the mixture into the various forms or frames needed.
The majority of cement plants in Greece mainly use natural gypsum to prevent rapid cement setting. The partial or total replacement of gypsum by materials, which contain calcium sulphate, has been instigated by two facts. Firstly, the increasing availability of low-cost by-products containing calcium sulphate and secondly, the prospect of the gypsum quarries to mine, in the near future, a rock that is a mixture of gypsum and anhydrite.
FGD gypsum, a waste material of the desulphurisation process in coal burning power plants, to convert SO3 content of flue gases into gypsum, is an important alternative source of chemical gypsum. The experiments done with only FGD gypsum shows that the setting time was influenced by the percentages of FGD gypsum addition in the mortars tested. The initial and final setting time increased with increasing FGD gypsum ratio. The compressive strength also was affected by increase of FGD gypsum in the mortars. At all ages the compressive strength of the mortar with addition of FGD gypsum in combination with natural gypsum was higher that to other mixtures. The performances of cements prepared with mixtures FGD gypsum/natural gypsum were better compared with that prepared only with natural gypsum. At the same time, a hydration study of cements with FGD is presented. The addition of FGD gypsum increases setting time without affecting the compressive strength profile. The degree of dehydration of the dehydrated calcium sulphate regulates setting and strength performance of the cement partially replaced with either anhydrite or FGD gypsum.
In addition, gypsum will react with the tricalcium aluminate mineral (C3A), which is the compound mainly responsible for the early setting time of cement. The reaction of gypsum with (C3A) will retard the setting time of cement (i.e. prolong the setting time), which is necessary for concreting operations to be completed perfectly, if the amount of gypsum is small the setting time will be short, however, addition large amount of gypsum to the clinker during its grinding will delay the harden of the cement paste and producing a large amount of heat during the reaction and solidification of concrete. Therefore the amount of gypsum should be controlled to achieve the proper setting time and decreasing the percentage of SO3 in the concrete, and to avoid steel corrosion and concrete structure deformation.
While producing 53 grade of cement, generally cement plant prefers to use mineral gypsum. Today industry faces shortage of mineral gypsum, which is the purer form of gypsum and the gap is bridged by synthetic gypsum mainly coming from fertiliser industry. This gypsum is commonly known as chemical gypsum. Shreesh Khadilkar in his article has covered in details about various options available on sourcing gypsum. As stated by Shreesh, FGD gypsum from thermal plants can become alternate source in place of fertiliser gypsum but it is still at an experimental stage.
Handling of gypsum in a cement plant is not so easy since it is a hygroscopic material and very sticky in nature. The readers now will appreciate that though gypsum is essential ingredient of cement but proving to be a speed breaker.
Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology
India is simultaneously grappling with two crises: a mounting waste emergency and an urgent need to decarbonise its most carbon-intensive industries. The cement sector, the second-largest in the world and the backbone of the nation’s infrastructure ambitions, sits at the centre of both. It consumes enormous quantities of fossil fuel, and it has the technical capacity to consume something else entirely: the waste our cities cannot get rid of.
According to CPCB and NITI Aayog projections, India generates approximately 62.4 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with that figure expected to reach 165 million tonnes by 2030. Much of this waste is energy-rich and non-recyclable. At the same time, cement kilns operate at material temperatures of approximately 1,450 degrees Celsius, with gas temperatures reaching 2,000 degrees. This high-temperature environment is ideal for co-processing, ensuring the complete thermal destruction of organic compounds without generating toxic residues. The physics are in our favour. The infrastructure is not.
Pre-processing is not the support act for co-processing. It is the main event. Get the particle size wrong, get the moisture wrong, get the calorific value wrong and your kiln thermal stability will suffer the consequences.
The Regulatory Push Is Real
The Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules 2026 mandate that cement plants progressively replace solid fossil fuels with Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), starting at a 5 per cent baseline and scaling to 15 per cent within six years. NITI Aayog’s 2026 Roadmap for Cement Sector Decarbonisation targets 20 to 25 per cent Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) by 2030. Beyond compliance, every tonne of coal replaced by RDF generates measurable carbon reductions which is monetisable under India’s emerging Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). TSR is no longer a sustainability metric. It is a financial lever.
Yet our own field assessments across multiple Indian cement plants reveal a sobering reality: the primary barrier to scaling AFR adoption is not waste availability. It is the fragmented and under-engineered pre-processing ecosystem that sits between the waste and the kiln.
Why Indian Waste Is a Different Engineering Problem
Indian municipal solid waste is not the material that imported shredding equipment was designed for. Our waste streams frequently exceed 40 per cent to 50 per cent moisture content, particularly during monsoon cycles, saturated with abrasive inerts including sand, glass, and stone. Plants relying on imported OEM equipment face months of downtime awaiting proprietary spare parts. Machines built for segregated, low-moisture waste fail quickly and disrupt the entire pre-processing operation in Indian conditions.
The two most common failures we observe are what I call the biting teeth problem and the chewing teeth problem. Plants relying solely on a primary shredder reduce bulk waste to large fractions, but the output remains too coarse for stable kiln combustion. Others attempt to use a secondary shredder as a standalone unit without a primary stage to pre-size the feed, leading to catastrophic mechanical failure. When both stages are present but mismatched in throughput capacity, the system becomes a bottleneck. Achieving the 40 to 70 tonnes per hour required for meaningful coal displacement demands a precisely coordinated two-stage process.
Engineering a Made-in-India Answer
At Fornnax, our response to these challenges is grounded in one principle: Indian waste demands Indian engineering. Our systems are built around feedstock homogeneity, the holy grail of kiln stability. Consistent particle size and predictable calorific value are the foundation of stable kiln combustion. Without them, no TSR target is achievable at scale.
Our SR-MAX2500 Dual Shaft Primary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive) processes raw, baled, or loosely mixed MSW, C&I waste, bulky waste, and plastics, reducing them to approximately 150 mm fractions at throughputs of up to 40 tonnes per hour. The R-MAX 3300 Single Shaft Secondary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive), introduced in 2025, takes that primary output and produces RDF fractions in the 30 to 80 mm range at up to 30 tonnes per hour, specifically optimised for consistent kiln feeding. We have also introduced electric drive configurations under the SR-100 HD series, with capacities between 5 and 40 tonnes per hour, already operational at a leading Indian waste-processing facility.
Looking ahead, Fornnax is expanding its portfolio with the upcoming SR-MAX3600 Hydraulic Drive primary shredder at up to 70 tonnes per hour and the R-MAX2100 Hydraulic drive secondary shredder at up to 20 tonnes per hour, designed specifically for the large-scale throughput that higher TSR ambitions require.
The Investment Case Is Now
The 2070 Net-Zero target is not a distant goal for India’s cement sector. It starts today, with decisions being made on the plant floor.
The SWM Rules 2026 are already in effect, requiring cement plants to replace coal with RDF. Carbon credit markets are opening up, and coal prices are not going to get cheaper. Every tonne of coal a cement plant replaces with waste-derived fuel saves money on one side and generates carbon credit revenue on the other. Pre-processing infrastructure is no longer just a compliance requirement. It is a business investment with a measurable return.
The good news is that nothing is missing. The technology works. The waste is available in every Indian city. The government has provided the policy direction. The only thing standing between where the industry is today and where it needs to be is the commitment to build the right infrastructure.
The cement companies that move now will not just meet the regulations. They will be ahead of every competitor that waits.
About The Author
Jignesh Kundaria is the Director and CEO of Fornnax Technology. Over an experience spanning more than two decades in the recycling industry, he has established himself as one of India’s foremost voices on waste-to-fuel technology and alternative fuel infrastructure.
The World Cement Association (WCA) has announced SiloConnect as its newest associate corporate member, expanding its network of technology providers supporting digitalisation in the cement industry. SiloConnect offers smart sensor technology that provides real-time visibility of cement inventory levels at customer silos, enabling producers to monitor stock remotely and plan deliveries more efficiently. The solution helps companies move from reactive to proactive logistics, improving delivery planning, operational efficiency and safety by reducing manual inspections. The technology is already used by major cement producers such as Holcim, Cemex and Heidelberg Materials and is deployed across more than 30 countries worldwide.
TotalEnergies and Holcim have commissioned a floating solar power plant in Obourg, Belgium, built on a rehabilitated former chalk quarry that has been converted into a lake. The project has a generation capacity of 31 MW and produces around 30 GWh of renewable electricity annually, which will be used to power Holcim’s nearby industrial operations. The project is currently the largest floating solar installation in Europe dedicated entirely to industrial self-consumption. To ensure minimal impact on the surrounding landscape, more than 700 metres of horizontal directional drilling were used to connect the solar installation to the electrical substation. The project reflects ongoing collaboration between the two companies to support industrial decarbonisation through renewable energy solutions and innovative infrastructure development.