Concrete
For better safety parameters, a holistic approach is needed
Published
7 months agoon
By
adminAnuj Kumar Mathur, Industry Expert and Consultant, and (retired) DGM – Safety, Health & Environment, Indian Oil Corporation, discusses the various mandatory measures to ensure safety within the manufacturing unit.
What are the key points of safety in a manufacturing plant?
Ensuring safety in a manufacturing plant is a systematic process that begins with the thorough identification of potential hazards. This involves regular assessments of the workplace, actively engaging employees in the recognition and reporting of potential risks. Subsequently, a comprehensive evaluation of associated risks is conducted, considering both severity and likelihood, utilising established risk assessment tools.
This is followed by prioritising the identified risks, involving categorisation based on severity and likelihood, with attention to legal and regulatory requirements. The development of a robust risk mitigation plan is then crucial, incorporating engineering controls, administrative measures and personal protective actions. Stakeholder collaboration, particularly with employees, is vital in both formulating and executing this plan.
Continuous monitoring is key to ensuring the ongoing effectiveness of the mitigation plan. Regular assessments of implemented controls, periodic risk reassessment and a commitment to continuous improvement based on feedback and emerging risks are integral components of this monitoring process. This systematic and proactive approach aims to establish a strong safety culture in the manufacturing plant, safeguarding employee well-being and contributing to the overall success of the operation.
Tell us about the safety gear that are essential while working with high heat, flammable substances, heights etc.?
When working in environments with high heat, flammable substances or heights, certain safety gear is essential to mitigate risks and ensure worker protection. For high heat environments, heat-resistant clothing such as fire-resistant coveralls, gloves and boots are crucial to protect against burns and heat-related injuries. Additionally, flame-resistant hoods and face shields provide further protection for the face and head.
When dealing with flammable substances, flame-resistant clothing made of materials like Nomex or Kevlar is indispensable to reduce the risk of ignition and burns. Safety goggles and chemical-resistant gloves are also essential to shield the eyes and hands from hazardous chemicals.
In situations involving heights, fall protection gear is paramount for worker safety. This includes harnesses, lanyards and anchor points to prevent falls and mitigate the impact in case of a fall. Safety helmets are vital for head protection from falling objects or impacts during work at heights.
Overall, the combination of heat-resistant clothing, flame-resistant gear, chemical-resistant gloves, safety goggles, fall protection equipment and safety helmets provides comprehensive protection for workers in environments with high heat, flammable substances and heights. Regular inspection, proper usage and adherence to safety protocols are equally important to ensure the effectiveness of the safety gear and safeguard workers’ well-being.
What are the major challenges in maintaining safety standards in any manufacturing unit?
Upholding safety standards in a manufacturing unit is a complex challenge, encompassing various facets. Human behaviour is a significant hurdle, where despite thorough safety training, factors like complacency or shortcuts can introduce risks. Shifting or reinforcing behaviours to prioritise safety demands continual focus on education, communication and cultivating a safety-conscious culture.
The monotony of work adds another layer to this challenge, as routine tasks may diminish vigilance towards safety protocols. Combating this involves introducing task variety, implementing job rotation and incorporating regular breaks to sustain employee engagement and attention to safety.
Moreover, the dynamic nature of manufacturing processes and the integration of new technologies present ongoing challenges in adapting and updating safety measures accordingly. Regular assessments are crucial to pinpoint potential hazards associated with evolving processes.
Effective communication emerges as a pivotal challenge, ensuring consistent understanding and transmission of safety information across all organisational levels. This spans communication on alterations in safety protocols, incident reporting procedures and the significance of adhering to safety guidelines.
In essence, maintaining safety standards in manufacturing demands a comprehensive strategy, addressing behavioural nuances, alleviating work monotony, adapting to technological shifts and establishing robust communication channels. Proactively confronting these challenges establishes a resilient safety culture, minimising the risk of accidents within the workplace.
As an auditor, what are your key checkpoints to declare a plant safe?
Firstly, I would meticulously review the Safety Policy to ensure its clarity, alignment with industry standards, and dissemination throughout the organisation. Regulatory compliances form a critical aspect, necessitating a thorough examination to confirm adherence to local, national, and international safety regulations.
I would assess safety indicators, such as incident rates and near-miss reporting, to gauge the effectiveness of the plant’s safety performance. The presence and functionality of safety interlocks in machinery and processes would be scrutinised to prevent accidents. Furthermore, the establishment of a robust preventive and predictive maintenance programme is crucial for identifying and addressing potential safety hazards before they escalate.
A key focus would be on evaluating the prevailing safety culture within the plant, emphasising the importance of employee engagement and commitment to safety. Additionally, the emergency plan, encompassing evacuation procedures, communication protocols and emergency response drills, would be thoroughly examined to ensure preparedness for unforeseen events. The culmination of these checkpoints would enable me to make an informed declaration regarding the safety status of the manufacturing plant during the audit.
What are the major challenges in maintaining plant safety?
One significant challenge is fostering a robust safety culture that ingrains safety as a core value among all employees. Overcoming behavioural aspects, such as complacency and the normalisation of risks, requires continuous efforts in education and communication. The monotony of daily tasks can contribute to lapses in attention, demanding innovative approaches to keep safety at the forefront. Adapting to technological advancements introduces challenges in updating safety protocols to align with evolving processes. Ensuring compliance with stringent regulatory standards is an ongoing challenge, requiring vigilant monitoring and adjustments to meet changing requirements. Effective communication channels must be established to consistently convey safety information across diverse organisational levels.
The dynamic nature of manufacturing processes necessitates continuous risk assessments and proactive mitigation strategies. Addressing these challenges requires a holistic approach, integrating behavioural interventions, technological adaptations and a commitment to regulatory compliance, thereby creating a workplace where safety is not just a protocol but a shared responsibility ingrained in the fabric of the organisation.
What suggestions would you give cement plants to improve safety parameters?
For better safety parameters, a holistic approach is needed. Firstly, establishing comprehensive training programmes is crucial, ensuring that maintenance personnel are well-versed in the specific safety challenges inherent to cement plant operations. Regular safety audits should be conducted to identify and mitigate potential hazards, emphasising compliance with safety standards. Adequate provision and consistent use of personal protective equipment (PPE) must be prioritised, encompassing gear such as hard hats, gloves, eye protection and respiratory equipment.
Rigorous adherence to machine guarding and lockout/tagout procedures is imperative to prevent accidents during maintenance activities. Fall protection measures, especially for tasks performed at heights, need to be implemented. Proper chemical handling protocols, preventive maintenance programmes, and well-rehearsed emergency response plans contribute to a comprehensive safety framework. Employee involvement should be encouraged, fostering a culture of shared responsibility. Continuous training and effective communication channels ensure that safety practices remain current. Finally, the implementation of behaviour-based safety programmes enhances overall safety consciousness. By integrating these suggestions, cement plants can proactively mitigate risks, creating a safer working environment for their maintenance personnel.
- –Kanika Mathur
You may like
Concrete
Indian cement makers to invest $ 14.3 bn
The bulk of this growth will come from the top-three cement producers–Ultratech, Ambuja and Shree Cement
Published
2 days agoon
September 6, 2024By
adminIndian cement manufacturers are set to invest approximately USD 14.3 billion over the next four years to increase capacity by 25 %. This move, driven by rising domestic demand, is expected to add an additional 160-170 million tons of cement production annually. The industry’s expansion will be predominantly funded through internal accruals, with minimal reliance on debt. The expansion is spurred by government’s massive infrastructure push, with plans to invest USD 1.7 trillion in infrastructure projects by 2030. According to S&P Global Ratings, the demand for cement in India is projected to grow at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7 % over the next four years, aligning with the planned capacity additions.
The bulk of this growth will come from the top-three cement producers–Ultratech, Ambuja and Shree Cement, which will account for over 70 % of the country’s total capacity increase. This expansion equates to an annual capital expenditure of close to Rs 300 billion, which will be more than double the average annual capex of the past decade. The leading cement companies, which produce 70 % of India’s total cement output, are in a strong financial position to support this expansion. Rising cement prices have bolstered their balance sheets, allowing them to reduce debt significantly while maintaining robust cash flows.
Concrete
SEBI Places JSW Cement’s Rs.4,000 Cr IPO on Hold
SEBI halts JSW Cement’s ?4,000 crore IPO.
Published
4 days agoon
September 4, 2024By
adminThe Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has placed the proposed ?4,000 crore Initial Public Offering (IPO) of JSW Cement on hold, citing regulatory concerns. This development comes as a significant pause in the cement manufacturer’s plans to raise capital through the public markets, a move that was expected to bolster its expansion and growth strategies in the competitive construction sector.
IPO Overview: JSW Cement, a key player in the Indian cement industry, had announced its intentions to launch a ?4,000 crore IPO. The offering was aimed at raising funds to support the company’s ongoing expansion projects, reduce debt, and improve operational efficiency.
SEBI’s Decision: SEBI, the regulatory body overseeing the capital markets in India, has decided to withhold its approval for the IPO. The decision was made after careful scrutiny of the draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) submitted by JSW Cement. While specific reasons for the hold have not been disclosed, it is understood that SEBI has sought further clarifications on certain aspects of the filing.
Impact on JSW Cement: The postponement of the IPO is likely to impact JSW Cement’s financial planning and expansion initiatives. The company had intended to use the proceeds from the IPO to fund new projects, including the construction of additional cement plants, modernization of existing facilities, and investments in sustainable practices.
Market Reactions: The decision by SEBI has led to a cautious response in the market. Investors and market analysts are closely monitoring the situation, as the delay could affect investor sentiment towards the company and its future fundraising efforts. The construction sector, which heavily relies on capital-intensive projects, may also be impacted by this development.
SEBI’s Concerns: SEBI’s decision to put the IPO on hold highlights the regulatory body’s commitment to ensuring transparency and investor protection in the capital markets. The regulator may be seeking additional information regarding JSW Cement’s financials, corporate governance practices, or other disclosures to ensure that the IPO meets all necessary requirements.
JSW Cement’s Response: JSW Cement is reportedly working closely with SEBI to address the concerns raised and to provide the required clarifications. The company remains optimistic about receiving the necessary approvals in due course and proceeding with the IPO as planned.
Industry Context: The Indian cement industry has seen significant activity in recent years, with companies looking to expand their capacities to meet growing demand. IPOs have become a popular route for raising capital, allowing companies to fund expansion and reduce debt. However, the regulatory environment remains stringent, with SEBI playing a crucial role in maintaining market integrity.
Future Prospects: While the IPO is currently on hold, JSW Cement’s long-term growth prospects remain robust, driven by its strong market position and ongoing investments in capacity expansion. The delay in the IPO may prompt the company to explore alternative fundraising options, such as debt financing or private equity, to meet its immediate capital needs.
Regulatory Environment: SEBI’s decision underscores the importance of regulatory compliance in the IPO process. Companies looking to tap the capital markets must ensure that their disclosures are thorough and transparent, meeting all regulatory standards to gain investor confidence.
Conclusion: The hold placed by SEBI on JSW Cement’s ?4,000 crore IPO is a reminder of the challenges that companies face in navigating the regulatory landscape. While this may delay the company’s fundraising plans, it also provides an opportunity to strengthen its disclosures and align with regulatory expectations, ultimately benefiting both the company and its investors.
JSW Cement now faces the task of addressing SEBI’s concerns to move forward with its IPO, a crucial step in its growth trajectory within the Indian cement industry.
Concrete
Smart Building Choices: Enhancing Life with Green Practices
Smart Building Choices: Enhancing Life with Green Practices
Published
5 days agoon
September 3, 2024By
admin