Concrete
Cement companies are investing in new age technologies
Arvind Kakru, Director Sales, Rockwell Automation, talks about the difference digitisation can make in the cement manufacturing and distribution processes, its long term impact and its contribution to the sustainability efforts of the industry as a whole.
Published
4 years agoon
By
admin
Arvind Kakru, Director Sales, Rockwell Automation, talks about the difference digitisation can make in the cement manufacturing and distribution processes, its long term impact and its contribution to the sustainability efforts of the industry as a whole.
How important is digital transformation in cement plants? How can it impact the business positively?
The cement plant of the future will have to focus on lower operating costs and higher asset values, which would mean higher energy efficiency, yield and throughput. The big levers for the cement plants would be carbon emission, yield and energy throughput, process utilisations, automations, and more.
The objective or the ultimate gains that people are looking at are demand driven production, streamline quality and compliance, data and knowledge driven efficiency, risk management and secure operation of the plant. A lot of it has to go from the smart manufacturing point of view, that would not only result in increasing the safety and automating the decision making but also improve reliability, increased efficiencies, improved process controls, reducing power consumption of their energy efficiency which is a big thing for cement plants. Also, looking at real time monitoring, reducing the carbon footprint and improving the operational flexibility. And there are some things that we potentially opt for as solutions around the smart manufacturing space would be smart yield optimisation, asset life cycle management, creative quality, intelligent machine manufacturing, productive asset reliability and much more. Such things possibly give access to technology led innovations, also go on a little deeper in meeting the regulatory compliance, which could be statuary in nature, related to quality, compliance or even manufacturing standards of the cement industry in general. Since we all know that cement is a big contributor to the carbon dioxide emission, and these solutions are not the solutions just from the operations point of view but sustainability point of view which is impactful.
What is the expected monetary investment by cement organisations to make their plants adapt to new digitalisation?
This would vary from plant to plants or manufacturer to manufacturer. Also, depending upon what stage of digital journey they are on right. , some people would be much more evolved and they already would have an investment, or seen business cases explained and executed. So, these are the people who possibly would spend much more.
People like us might be a little early in the cycle in that space. If I had to modify something, we would start from rupees forty to fifty lakhs, also which is around analytics and that could be used as a pilot case to be used to determine if there is a serious business case and that kind of investment would really pay off. Because the time for the execution would not be more than a few months and at the same point of time, the investment is not very much high. And they would possibly feel much more comfortable after evolving and evaluating that process and accordingly make the investments. This is a very little investment and such investments are coherent which means that can be evolved and still be connected with other sections of the plant that could be integrated at the later stage, they are scalable, and ultimately going plant wide or the enterprise wide. According to a McKinsey and Company study, estimates are that cement companies have seen about 6 to 12 per cent better optimisation from advanced analytics.
Other areas of benefit where small investments could result in big transformation could be processed digitalisation and process automation overall where 10 per cent to 15 per cent is the estimated gain on the productivity. So, Rs 40-50 lakh of investment could result in a much higher return of investment and possibly in less than a year. It could vary from a very small amount to ultimately a larger amount of capital expenditure which would be a few crore rupees but that could be distributed over a period of time. And if you go enterprise wide execution on the digital expansion or the digital roll outs for the programs looking at the multiple areas of the plant, process machinery, etc. it could go into a few years of capex and opex (recurring charges on the software that you possibly potentially upfront).
Multiple players in the industry are moving towards making cement production sustainable. How can your technology help in achieving those targets?
If you look at the labour for cement producers, they have increased in energy efficiency and use of alternate materials like fuel, raw materials, etc. The conventional measures to reduce carbon dioxide emission from cement manufacturing for further improvement in thermal energy efficiency and other innovative technologies that people keep on pursuing. This means all very significant in terms of transformation for the cement industry.
Talking about the commitment, by 2030 the cement industry contributes to possibly around 0.3 per cent annually, reducing the carbon emissions. So, process control becomes very critical to set your old machines to be very efficient, also making the plant connected which is a lot of technologies kept connected together because then you pull in individual resources and then get on to them at the corporate or an enterprise level which helps you look at everything like a dashboard or one consolidated level and that helps you to mind data through quality, production, process parameters and allowing operator to understand the energy consumption. Another big thing would be productive control, machine learning, etc. are some of the technologies that would be really helpful which possibly would help in productive maintenance forecasts. So when the failures occur, machine learning understands the forecasting orders and runs algorithms, which predict failures, categorises them, observe the pattern and notify the people who need to know the insights. They also reduce the down time to reduce the maintenance cost related to that.
AR, VR could be useful in space when you are looking at those downtimes, reducing them, and giving quality expert advice from remote rather than somebody physically travelling. This in turn results in quicker recovery or a turn-around time. Then there are things related to anomaly detection, which again comes from productive control or the machine learning part of cement operations such as grinding, blending, cooling, pre-heating. It detects failure or poor performance in the process and they also improve overtime making it easier for the cement plants to implement one or more solutions for persistent operative decision making. These are some of the areas, which really help in energy performance, lowering the operating cost, improving the quality like reduction of raw materials, fuels, and also emission related to greenhouse gas and reduction contribution, because of all these process improvements in digital programs.
Tell us about the technology supporting the ‘Connected Cement Plant’.
You look at multiple levels in a particular program, one of the things is the devices operating on the shop floor or the manufacturing site. They have to be intelligent otherwise how will you get the data? So, we have to ensure that all of the data on the field level are intelligent devices, as in they have control over the process, they have sensors in place and have software connectivity which throws off the data on the larger enterprise level. Next is that when you connect these IoT gateways, you ensure connectivity with process control with power equipment along the field which is actually controlling your machine and equipment in a particular manufacturing environment. And from there on you take it to the next level where you are controlling and after the monitoring, observing and taking a lot of data over there. Which is helping in supply chain simulations, process optimisation, conditioning monitoring equipment and then throwing up to the next level, which is connecting all the third-party enterprises. And then look at process optimisation and then you connect them to a particular platform, which can be a scale up platform, control platform or an IoT platform related to visual analytics, remote monitoring, productive analytics and ultimately connecting to the enterprise and the business applications. You are connecting the suppliers of the market to the consumers. If you have that end-to-end visibility, it?s a great thing in terms of controlling the manufacturing operations, getting most out of your assets and design building, upgrading with confidence so as to take necessary decisions. We could see big things in the last two years during the Covid times and that is a helpful outcome of the digital process in a connected cement plant.
Cement plants often face challenges in understanding the fluctuating demand of the market. How can automation come to aid this challenge?
Cement countries are further exploring and investing in new age technologies, which includes artificial intelligence, machine learning, business analytics, and digital control towers to control and enhance supply chain and logistics visibility. Demand forecast helps in managing the demand and supply of the products – let?s say ready mix cement and complete supply and consolidated network of checkpoints, milestones, needs to be monitored for a very organised transaction. PwC (Pricewaterhouse Coopers) study says that digitised supply chains are the major revenue booster for cement manufacturing companies. An outgrown supply chain performs complex tasks from inventory, procurement to distribution of finished goods. Also, streamlines demand and inventory sourcing and distribution to the channel partners in the value chain overall. So, other than the inventory management, on the transportation side, how much fuel is consumed by the truckers is also monitored. We could optimise the transportation and make real time decisions on how demand is ramping up at some places or scaling down. If you also carry multiple operations, the states and geographies have varied rates of cement. So, one has to consider whether it is possible to transport from one manufacturing location to another region which is a more efficient manufacturing location and also profitable or not? It can even expand from the supply chain side of it all the fluctuating demand rate actually connecting with the operation and the top line and bottom line of the company.
How does The PlantPAx® distributed control system (DCS) help achieve efficiency in design and feature? How can the impact be quantified?
If you typically look at the DCS system of the cement plant, it has a behavioural pattern where the process automation includes instrumentation, power and control. So, there are electronics in the automation package which goes into the additional arenas as well also include control and instrumental package. We offer an open standard DCS distributed control system that has a flexible platform to address all ranges of plant sizes. It has a very high availability and redundancy to take care of running operation of the plant. There is no down time or failure. It has integrated diagnostics through which we are able to really look at what is happening right or wrong at your plant and accordingly take corrective actions. It has powerful and seamless connectivity with the field instrumentation and devices. The more connected you are the more ability you have in terms of looking at what is happening in a particular plant. And from there you can build up all the data which is at the heart of the system, then you have an embedded model equipped control with that you have premium integration with smart water control. So overall if you look at it there is simplified design, an improved operation, there is a safety and security part of it and its future ready enabled with the latest in the technology which can easily be connected with other intelligent devices across the manufacturing plant or any other place. It helps in manufacturing at the down time and is scalable. We have this feature in PlantPAx 5.0 onwards which reduces footprints and consistent delivery streamlining of workload, cyber security, and analytics enabled. It also results in empowering the operators and reducing the training cost for them. It also results in improved maintenance in all critical areas and helps in maintaining the availability. It enables decisions at a system level and also is very cyber secured and complied to ISA 99, ISA 62, which helps us to put in difference in depth solutions and help in making the process compliant, safe, secure and scalable.
Tell us more about the convergence of Information Technology (IT) and Operational Technology (OT) tools by Rockwell Automation. What is the return on investment a cement company expects on this technology investment?
Rockwell Automation is the company best known for its focus on Information Technology (IT) and Operational Technology (OT), we say we are the possibly the best company that has expertise in both areas. When we say convergence of IT and OT, the convergence of software and machinery in the production environment is assuring a new era of connected operations for a lot of industries and or cement also.
It offers enhanced levels of efficiency and opportunity for better decision making across all aspects of manufacturing and production. Connecting the process control measurement and safety system at a production site with IT infrastructure and application enables more connectivity for highly valuable time data and remote support. On the other hand, they want to minimise the risk of the outcome which can be managed in a very safe, secured and compliant way. There are multiple ways to integrate the process and ensure the information can flow freely across IT and OT systems, which would be to identify and align critical data facts to consider the entire supply value chain, fill in the security gap, set up for the third-party integration and enable capabilities.
If I look at securely converging IT and OT system which means potential, intentional network design and security at Rockwell Enterprises we address the cyber risk, connecting all asset converge plants via internet communications protocol, create an environment of real time resolution, and also look at the right execution standards and strategies, and maintain business continuity through implementation. It helps us to deliver the benefit to secure operation, reduce vulnerability and also achieve a lot of those benefits. In our own environment we tested in our factories, the annual production improvement included about 5 per cent apex, avoidance about 30 per cent inventory, in one particular case we reduced for 120-82 days and delivery went really good, also, the lead time was reduced by 50 per cent. It’s really important for people to make those decisions and gains are really big.
Data plays a huge role in bringing operational and productivity efficiency by connecting assets, people and information. How does your organisation make that happen through digital automation?
We start with smart devices, smart machines at some place, which enables the data to be thrown up at the enterprise level. Then the process automation and the package power overall which results in overall operation efficiency and modern technologies here improve the performance of process, equipment and people. A smart device we have a smart device and manufacturing overall connecting all the individual cells in a particular manufacturing environment and then taking it to larger manufacturing. Then looking at third party integration, market visibility which is from mining to market right where our consumers are and connected workforce. At the same point of time, you throw up on the enterprise level a lot of data with the proper technologies you go into knowledge operation which means you offer solutions and enable better decision making. It’s like an end to end process from a basic manufacturing level to going right up to the enterprise level offering solutions that help you look at your past historical data, real time data (the current data). Also, in some cases you can have the data of the future which shows predictions.
What kind of innovative technological solutions for the cement plants can be expected in the future from your organisation?
We have been looking at some of the solutions already with some of the other industries where we have taken a lead. Cement did not used to be organised before and now that we see a lot of things coming in from the market point of view, regulatory point of view, sustainability point of view, helping people or cement manufacturers or the decision makers who focus aggressively on some of these things.
Talking about advanced process control, which can be used to stabilise and optimise the key cement processes with the help of production increase in kilns and mills implications; and controlling of energy usage, which reduces in or helping in the reduction of process and quality variability. So, another thing was model productivity control, which optimises material blending, optimises thermal and commercial control for kilns. We would offer data analytics and IOT environment, advanced algorithms that help in improving yield, through good quality, energy, efficiency, etc. which also helps in Automated tracking of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (AOEE). Typically, it?s in a machine or a discrete manufacturing environment that is very critical. And also, advanced analytic enabled software to make strategies to improve quality or equipment reliability. Looking at operations if they are running as per plans, natural disasters and planning which have been helpful in the past for certain manufacturers, they offer new opportunities for digital collaboration, assistance for trouble shooting in some cases over a video, etc. can improve training needs, enhancing the safety of the workers to a large extent. It’s very important to have a cyber security programme in place, which goes from identification to detection, to protection and finally helping in response and recovery quickly. Some of these strategies would help in ensuring that there is no cyber attack in the first place because your equipment, network is secured. Also model predictive control machine learning which really helps in utilising the mathematical models where MPCs used for responding changes to the process and variable. So, they help in reducing downtime and making the equipment much more efficient and making the process much more reliable.
– Kanika Mathur
You may like
-
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
-
Predictive maintenance minimises the risk
-
AI is solving longstanding challenges
-
Beyond the Gearbox: How a Holistic Lubrication Strategy Reduces Total Cost of Ownership in Cement Plants
-
Customer requirements are the primary driver.
-
The Road Ahead Begins Here
Concrete
CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech
To build capacity of 100,000 tonnes a year
Published
1 day agoon
August 28, 2026By
admin
CarbonStrong has raised Rs 125 million (125 mn) to scale a low carbon cement technology and build commercial production capacity. The startup was founded in 2022 by Harsh Jain and Vikramaditya Singh and has moved from customer trials to plans for industrial supply. The company said its material replaces up to 50 per cent of cement in concrete while reducing costs and improving durability.
CarbonStrong states the product is around 30 per cent cheaper than cement and compatible with existing concrete plants, reducing the need for new equipment and operational disruption. Trials and paid pilots have been conducted in Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Chennai with demonstration projects involving ready-mix firms and precast manufacturers. Compatibility with current workflows forms a central part of the commercial strategy, aiming to ease adoption by builders and contractors.
The funding will support construction of a facility with capacity of up to 100,000 tonnes (100,000 t) a year over the next two years to supply early customers commercially. The firm is also developing materials from steel slag, copper slag and mine tailings to expand its feedstock base, while noting the technical challenge of homogenising different waste streams. Recognition by HCL ClimaForce in 2026 and by the Avaana-Startup India-NITI Aayog AIM Grand Challenge in 2025 has underscored progress.
Industry adoption remains the principal test and will require consistent material performance, supply reliability and competitive economics. CarbonStrong projects the Indian market for cement substitutes could reach Rs 250 billion (250 bn) by 2030 and has set an ambition to produce 10 million tonnes a year by 2035 (10 mn t), a target far above its near term capacity. Moving from pilots to production demands capital, manufacturing discipline and customers willing to specify the material beyond demonstrations. The recent Rs 125 million raise is intended to fund the next phase of scale and to demonstrate that industrial waste can become a dependable input for lower carbon construction.
In a research-backed article, Dr SB Hegde examines why carbon-adjusted profitability and LC3 will decide the next set of winners in cement manufacturing.
The Indian cement industry has achieved world-class operational efficiency through lower specific energy consumption, high plant utilisation and a reduced average clinker factor of approximately 67.5 per cent. These traditional measures of operational excellence remain essential. However, they are no longer sufficient. Carbon now carries a measurable financial cost under India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) and under European carbon markets. Future leadership will be defined by carbon-adjusted profitability, the ability to generate strong returns while systematically lowering the carbon intensity of every ton sold.
Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) offers a practical, scalable pathway to achieve this dual objective. By replacing up to 50 per cent of clinker with calcined clay and limestone, LC3 can reduce CO2 emissions by 30–40 per cent while delivering comparable or superior durability performance.
This article examines the technical foundations of LC3, European industrial practices, the emerging Indian carbon market and a concrete roadmap for Indian companies to embed carbon-adjusted metrics and LC3 into daily operations, incentives and commercial strategy.
Limits of traditional operational excellence
For many years, plant performance has been judged primarily by five indicators: specific heat consumption, specific power consumption, kiln and mill utilisation, clinker factor and overall equipment effectiveness. These metrics drove continuous improvement and helped the industry reduce energy use and increase the share of blended cement. Three structural changes have rendered them incomplete as sole measures of success.
First, carbon now carries a real or opportunity cost. Plants that improve volume or lower cash cost while raising or stagnating emissions intensity create a hidden liability that will surface as CCTS trading matures and as green procurement expands.
Second, lower-carbon products such as LC3 and high-performance blended cements are creating differentiated market segments. Customers in infrastructure, real estate and export-oriented construction are beginning to specify embodied-carbon limits.
Third, investors and lenders increasingly treat carbon intensity as a financial risk factor. Traditional KPIs can mask the divergence between short-term cash profit and long-term carbon-adjusted value.
What is carbon-adjusted profitability?
Carbon-adjusted profitability evaluates normal profit after explicit adjustment for carbon performance. A practical expression is:
Carbon-Adjusted EBITDA = Conventional EBITDA – Carbon Cost + Green Premium Income
Carbon cost may be an internal carbon price, the actual cost of purchasing Carbon Credit Certificates under CCTS, or the opportunity cost of high emissions relative to peers. Green premium income arises when customers pay more for verified lower-carbon cement or when the company sells surplus credits. Tracking both conventional and carbon-adjusted profit side-by-side gives management a clearer picture of value creation under evolving market rules.
Table 1. Traditional KPIs versus Carbon-Adjusted Leadership Metrics
Traditional Focus New Leadership Metric Why It Matters
Specific energy consumption Emissions intensity (kg CO2/t cement) Directly linked to future CCTS and CBAM costs
Kiln utilisation Carbon-adjusted contribution margin Reveals true value of incremental volume
Clinker factor Share of lower-carbon products sold (incl. LC3) Measures commercial success of the transition
Power cost per tonne Effective carbon cost per tonne sold Expose hidden liabilities
Absolute EBITDA Carbon-adjusted EBITDA + green premium Aligning profit with future market reality
LC3: Technical foundations and performance advantages
LC3 is a ternary blended cement that typically combines approximately 50 per cent clinker, 30 per cent calcined clay, 15 per cent limestone and 5 per cent gypsum (the classic LC3-50 formulation). The decisive technical advantage is that clay is calcined at 700–850 °C, far below the 1,450 °C required for clinker production. This lower temperature, together with the substantial reduction in clinker content, delivers CO2 reductions of 30–40 per cent relative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC).
Chemistry is synergistic. Calcined kaolinitic clay (metakaolin) reacts with calcium hydroxide from clinker hydration and with limestone to form additional C-A-S-H gel and carboaluminate phases. These phases densify the microstructure, reduce porosity and improve durability.
Field experience shows superior resistance to chloride ingress, sulphate attack and alkali–silica reaction. Early-age strength can match OPC with high-reactivity clays; later-age strengths routinely meet 42.5 and 52.5 grade requirements.
Importantly, LC3 does not require high-purity kaolin. Clays with 40 per cent or even lower kaolinite content can be activated successfully, expanding raw-material availability across India. Calcination can use adapted rotary kilns or dedicated flash calciners, making the technology compatible with existing plant infrastructure and far less capital-intensive than carbon capture.
Economic analyses show that LC3 can be produced at equal or lower cost than OPC in many locations because of reduced energy demand and cheaper clay. Life-cycle assessments consistently report 30–40 per cent lower embodied CO2 per tonne of cement.
Table 2. Comparative profile: OPC versus LC3-50
Parameter OPC LC3-50
Typical clinker content ~95 per cent ~50 per cent
CO2 emissions (relative) Baseline (≈0.85 t CO2/t cement process + fuel) 30–40 per cent lower
Clay calcination temperature Not applicable 700–850 °C
Key hydration products C-S-H, portlandite, ettringite C-A-S-H + carboaluminates
Chloride & sulphate resistance Good Superior
Production cost potential Baseline Equal or lower in most locations
Infrastructure compatibility Existing High (minor adaptations)
In India, commercial adoption has begun in earnest. JK Cement commenced the first commercial production of LC3 in the Indian subcontinent at its Mangrol plant in Rajasthan in 2025 under BIS standard IS 18189.
By early 2026, approximately 2,000 tonnes had been produced and sold, avoiding an estimated 500 tonnes of CO2. JK Lakshmi Cement followed with commercial launch of its Green PRO LC3 grade from the Jaykaypuram plant. As of mid-2026, two producers are supplying LC3 to the market. The first large-scale infrastructure application is the Noida International Airport (Jewar), where LC3 was used in the runway and a building complex, demonstrating full constructability and performance under demanding conditions. These early volumes are still small relative to national cement demand, but they mark the critical transition from pilot to commercial reality. Companies that scale capacity now will be positioned to capture both CCTS credits and emerging green-procurement demand.
Why the shift is accelerating
According to the World Bank’s State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026, direct carbon pricing now covers nearly 30 per cent of global greenhouse-gas emissions and generated more than US$107 billion in public revenue in 2025. The average global carbon price stands at approximately US$21 per tonne, although regional prices vary widely.
In Europe, the EU ETS price has traded near €80–85 per tonen in mid-2026. Free allocation for cement is being withdrawn in parallel with CBAM. European producers therefore face a clear signal: every tonne of avoided CO2 improves both compliance and competitiveness. Holcim has scaled calcined-clay production, including Europe’s first dedicated line at Saint-Pierre-la-Cour (France) and a second line in the Czech Republic (2026). Heidelberg Materials, Cementir (FUTURECEM) and others have commercialised low-clinker calcined-clay blends across multiple markets, showing that carbon-adjusted profitability is already reshaping capital allocation in the world’s most mature carbon market.India’s CCTS is now operational. Binding emission intensity targets apply to 186 cement facilities for FY 2025–26 and FY 2026–27. Average required reductions for integrated plants are modest (around 2.7 per cent by FY 2027), yet the direction is clear.
Trading of Carbon Credit Certificates is expected in the second half of 2026, with early prices likely in the `800–1,500 per tonne range. Plants that outperform targets can sell credits; those that underperform must buy them or face compensation. Cement is well positioned to be a net supplier of credits if clinker factor continues to fall through LC3 and other low-clinker systems.
Way forward for India
India starts from a strong baseline, world-class energy efficiency and a clinker factor already lower than the global average. The next competitive frontier is the deliberate reduction of process emissions through clinker substitution at scale. LC3 is uniquely suited to Indian conditions because suitable clays are widely distributed, the technology fits existing kiln and grinding infrastructure, and the resulting product can meet the performance demands of both infrastructure and building construction.
A practical national pathway contains five interlocking elements:
- Standards and acceptance: Accelerated finalisation and promotion of BIS specifications for calcined-clay and limestone–calcined-clay cements will remove a key barrier to commercial uptake. Alignment with European practice (EN 197-5) can facilitate knowledge transfer and export readiness.
- Supply-chain development: Investment in flash calcination capacity and systematic characterisation of regional clay deposits will secure reliable, low-cost feedstock. Existing rotary kilns can be adapted for initial volumes while dedicated calciners are built.
- Incentive alignment: Part of variable compensation for plant managers, sales teams and senior leadership should be linked to emissions intensity reduction and to the volume of lower-carbon products (including LC3) sold. Without this link, traditional volume and cost targets will continue to dominate behaviour.
- Product-level carbon accounting: Reliable measurement of emissions intensity at the individual cement grade level, supported by third-party verification where required, is essential for both CCTS compliance and credible green claims.
- Demand-side pull: Green public procurement policies that specify maximum embodied-carbon thresholds for major infrastructure projects will create a predictable market for LC3 and other low-carbon cements, accelerating scale and cost reduction.
Companies that treat LC3 as a strategic product line rather than a niche offering will be better positioned to generate surplus Carbon Credit Certificates, capture any emerging green premium, and protect margins as carbon costs rise.
Organisational changes required
Technical capability alone is insufficient. Three organisational shifts are required.
Daily management: Emissions intensity must appear on the same daily and monthly dashboards as heat consumption, power consumption and utilization. Plant reviews should examine both conventional and carbon-adjusted results.
Incentives: A meaningful portion of bonuses for plant heads, technical teams and sales leadership should be tied to lower emissions intensity and successful commercialisation of LC3 and other low-carbon grades.
Commercial approach: Sales teams need clear volume and pricing targets for lower-carbon products, supported by technical service that helps customers specify and place the material correctly. Without commercial pull, excellent technical performance remains under-utilised.
Table 3. Three-stage roadmap to carbon-adjusted profitability
Time Horizon Priority Actions Expected Outcome
Next 12 months Add emissions intensity to plant dashboards; establish internal carbon price; initiate LC3 pilot production and customer trials Visibility and early organisational learning
12–24 months Revise incentive systems; scale LC3 and other low-carbon grades to key accounts; secure third-party verification capability People and sales aligned with carbon goals
24–36 months Embed carbon-adjusted metrics in board reporting and capital allocation; expand calcined-clay capacity Full system integration and competitive advantage
Questions senior leaders should ask
Boards can accelerate the transition by insisting on answers to a short list of questions:
• Is our carbon-adjusted profit improving, stable or declining relative to conventional EBITDA?
• Did recent volume growth improve or worsen our emissions intensity?
• What share of sales already comes from lower-carbon products, including LC3, and what is the trajectory?
• How exposed is our capital expenditure plan to rising carbon costs under CCTS and potential CBAM-related requirements?
• Do our incentive systems still reward only volume and cost, or have they been updated to include carbon performance?
Treating carbon with the same seriousness as energy cost or kiln utilization does not diminish operational excellence; it expands the definition of excellence to match the new competitive reality.
Looking ahead
By 2030 the gap between leading and lagging cement companies will not be decided by who records the lowest specific heat consumption. It will be decided by who delivers the strongest carbon-adjusted profits.
Absolute emissions may still rise as national production grows. That is not the issue. Companies that reduce intensity year after year and successfully sell cleaner products will pull ahead in both domestic and export markets. Those that do not will fall behind, even if their traditional efficiency numbers look strong.
Operational excellence built the Indian cement industry. It remains the foundation. It is no longer the complete picture. Carbon-adjusted profitability is the clearer measure of success.
LC3 is not a distant technology. It is available now. It cuts CO3 by 30–40 per cent, works with existing plants, and is already in commercial production in India. Companies that treat it as a strategic product, not a pilot, will protect their margins and generate tradable credits.
Leaders who act now will place carbon metrics on daily dashboards, link incentives to intensity reduction and LC3 sales, invest in calcined-clay capacity, and build commercial capability to sell lower-carbon products. They will shape the next chapter of the industry.
References
- World Bank. (2026). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
- International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). (2026). India Carbon Credit Trading Scheme – Status and Coverage. Berlin: ICAP.
- Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Bureau of Energy Efficiency. (2025). Greenhouse Gases Emission Intensity Target Rules, 2025. New Delhi: Government of India.
- Scrivener, K., Martirena, F., Bishnoi, S., & Maity, S. (2018). Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 49–56.
- RMI. (2024). The Business Case for LC3. Rocky Mountain Institute.
- European Commission. (2026). EU Emissions Trading System – Allowance Price Data and Free Allocation Phase-out Schedule. Brussels.
- Holcim. (2025–2026). Scaling Calcined Clay for Sustainable Building – Corporate Updates on European and Latin American Capacity. Zurich: Holcim Ltd.
- LC3 Project / EPFL. (2026). LC3 – A Guide to Best Practices for Scalable, Affordable and Sustainable Low-Carbon Building. Lausanne: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
- Business Today / Industry Reports. (2026). First Large-Scale LC3 Application at Noida International Airport, Jewar. New Delhi.
- NITI Aayog / Industry Analyses. (2026). Roadmap and Baseline Performance Indicators for the Indian Cement Sector. New Delhi.
- Springer / Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. (2026). LC3 Systems: A Review of Chemistry, Performance, Durability and Sustainability toward Market Adoption.
- Cementir Holding / Industry Sources. (2025–2026). FUTURECEM and Related Low-Clinker Technologies in Europe.
- Climate Risk Horizons & Independent Analyses. (2026). Assessment of Emission Intensity Targets under India’s CCTS for Cement and Other Hard-to-Abate Sectors.
- GCCA / TERI. (Various years). Decarbonization Roadmaps for the Indian Cement Industry.
- EN 197-5:2021. Cement – Part 5: Portland-composite cement CEM II/C-M and Composite cement CEM VI. European Committee for Standardization.
Concrete
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
Published
1 day agoon
August 28, 2026By
admin
Dijam Panigrahi makes a counterintuitive but data-backed argument that routing every sensor alert through human approval does not make cement plants safer.
India’s cement industry has spent the last two years wiring kilns, mills and coolers with sensors and automated control systems, and the safety case for doing so is strong on paper. Contract workers still make up the majority of the industry’s workforce, and fatal accidents remain a recurring problem. The Indian National Cement Workers Federation has noted that around 83 per cent of workers in the sector hold precarious positions, a fact that resurfaced after an oxygen cylinder explosion killed three contract workers at a plant in Chhattisgarh.
Industry tallies compiled by IndustriALL found cement plants recorded at least seventeen accidents in one year with 21 workers killed, and ten accidents the following year with nine killed, most of them contract staff. Automated monitoring, in theory, closes that gap. A sensor never gets complacent and never skips a check because a shift is short staffed.
However, plants that respond by routing every anomaly reading to a person for approval are quietly building a system that fails the same way understaffing does. When operators receive dozens of flagged deviations a shift, most of them minor, they learn a simple lesson: the fastest way through the queue is to approve without reading closely. The safety benefit disappears, not because the technology failed, but because the humans supervising it adapted to the volume.
Why alerts get ignored
A study cited by manufacturing technology publisher Applied SmartFactory found more than 95 per cent of alarms in a semiconductor fab were low priority, and only about 4 per cent ever triggered an action, with just 100 out of 5,000 alarms accounting for 70 per cent of all alarm activity. The mechanism is the same whether the trigger is a vibration sensor or an AI model flagging a kiln temperature swing. Once the ratio of noise to signal crosses a threshold, workers stop treating the system as a decision aid and start treating it as a formality to clear.
The scale of AI deployment underway makes this more than a theoretical risk. Stanford’s 2026 AI Index Report found organisational adoption of AI has reached 88 per cent, even as documented AI incidents rose to 362 in 2025, up sharply from 233 the year before, according to analysis of the report. The Index also found only about a third of organisations have adopted a formal governance framework, with NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework cited by 33 per cent and ISO/IEC 42001 cited by 36 per cent.
Most manufacturers are deploying monitoring systems faster than they are building the judgment for when a flagged event actually needs a person’s attention. In India, plants run by JK Cement have begun pairing CCTV feeds with AI to define safe zones around heavy machinery, a promising direction that still depends on operators trusting and reading the alerts the system generates.
A three-tier model for cement plant
The fix is not less monitoring or more monitoring. It is classifying decisions by risk and by novelty, rather than treating human oversight as a single switch that is either on or off. A workable model sorts factory floor events into three tiers.
The first tier, proceed, covers deviations the plant has seen before that fall within known safe bounds, such as a kiln feed rate adjustment within an established range. These should run without a stop for approval, because routing them to a person only trains that person to click through.
The second tier, pause, covers events that are unusual but not yet dangerous, such as a vibration reading trending toward a limit or a fuel blend shifting outside its typical mix. These warrant a brief human check before the system proceeds, giving an operator the chance to apply judgment the model does not yet have.
The third tier, escalate, covers events that are both high risk and unfamiliar, such as a pressure reading combined with a temperature spike that has no close precedent in the plant’s history. These should stop the process entirely and require a decision from someone with the authority to shut down a line.
Who should set the threshold
Where these tiers get drawn matters as much as the framework itself. Threshold setting is frequently handed to the vendor supplying the monitoring software or to a plant’s IT department, both of which understand the technology but not the specific tolerances of a given kiln, mill or line. Operations staff, who know that a particular grinding unit runs hotter under monsoon humidity or that a calciner behaves differently after a refractory reline, are better positioned to calibrate what counts as routine on their own equipment.
Handing threshold ownership to operations does not remove IT or vendors from the process, but it puts the calibration decision closest to the people who live with its consequences on the floor.
Signals that oversight is actually working
A few concrete indicators reveal whether a monitoring setup is functioning as intended or simply providing the appearance of safety. The escalation rate over time is the first: a rate that stays flat or climbs slowly as operations mature is healthy, while one that spikes and then falls sharply often means operators have started overriding the system rather than engaging with it. Time to resolution is the second: escalations that take progressively longer to close suggest fatigue or confusion about ownership, not diligence. The third, and most telling, is how accurate the system’s own uncertainty estimates turn out to be, meaning whether events flagged as high risk actually correlated with real incidents, and whether events waved through stayed incident free. A system whose escalations do not track with actual outcomes trains operators toward the same complacency that unmonitored equipment produces.
None of this argues against automation in Indian cement manufacturing, where a labor structure built on contract work and a track record of serious accidents make better monitoring an urgent need. It argues for treating human oversight as a design problem with three distinct settings, rather than a single
dial turned up whenever a plant wants to look safer on paper.
About the author:
Dijam Panigrahi, Co-founder and COO, GridRaster, is a spatial computing platform for industrial enterprises and manufacturers.
CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech
Protect Your Margins
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
The biggest gap arises from inconsistent leadership
The Future of Vertical Material Handling
CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech
Protect Your Margins
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
The biggest gap arises from inconsistent leadership

