Underscoring the vital role a robust distribution network plays in the cement sector, Indian Cement Review looks at the different parameters that affect the performance of a channel and it’s ultimate litmus test for efficiency and sustainability.
Conventional metrics in cement distribution would lead us from the factory gates to the final consumption point and to the role of efficiency in distribution with a range of intra-firm channel partners embedded in the chain from exclusivity to inclusivity, but that does not answer many questions that must be asked if a number of objective functions have to be met. The performance of a channel can be measured across multiple dimensions. The parameters that are measured usually are effectiveness, efficiency, productivity, equity and profitability of the channel. Cement Industry as a whole has settled for some objectives that remain non-negotiable, while there are new objects on the horizon for the future, sustainability being one of them. As a substantial percentage of the cost is embedded in logistics, the focus on logistics therefore subsumes many of the other competing objective functions, sustainability will not make it less onerous.
The indispensable element The Indian cement industry has recently moved beyond the base requirements of Return on Capital Employed (ROCE). Some of the leaders demonstrate that they can deliver returns that fully exceed the cost of capital, equity included, but those heavily invested have some catching up to do. It is in this context that the distribution channel assumes far more importance as quite a substantial component of the capital is employed in the service of distributing cement to the end consumer; working capital embedded in the channel plays a distinct role in improving ROCE. Distribution data among industry firms is not readily available as transparently nor are they used for benchmarking. But indirectly the data shows that in most firms as high as 25 per cent of the capital employed is in the working capital for servicing inventory and receivables alone. This may not be obvious if one goes by the peculiarity of the cement industry, with a channel structure built around distributing from the cement producing plant to the market within a catchment area of at maximum 300km on average as otherwise transportation cost would be too high to make the distribution economical. Thus the network optimisation programmes run to see how the transportation cost could be optimised with an Integrated plant approach versus a Hub & Spoke with several models of channels around them. But either way an average outbound logistics cost of Rs 1,350/T for the industry (all models aggregated) talks of 25 per cent of the cost of sales dedicated to the distribution logistics alone.
Capital and costs The focus on logistics cost leads the industry to use inventory buffers that can effectively reduce this cost through shipment bundles, utilisation of logistics capacity and scale densities as well, with warehousing capacity as an important piece of the puzzle. The channel partners also play a role in ensuring that the logistics cost remains the primary focus at all times and thus demand aggregation must fulfill logistics cost minimisation. This is where the objective functions clash with each other and working capital must also be included as an equally potent metric. A shift away from logistics cost as the primary metric and including total cash blocked in the distribution would perhaps ensure a fairer share of the importance of cash conversion as an important driver of business results. Cement supply chains starting from factory to the consumption point (almost a majority of the cases) work on the push-mode with the decoupling points as warehousing facilities or large exclusive dealerships who work as distributors to the final retail outlets in dealer shops. Vertical integration as attempted in Ready Mix Concrete supply chains (who also become decoupling points) work much better in smoothening the demand supply equation and thus closer to Just-in-Time methods as visible signs that take out a sizeable chunk of inventory holding waiting for demand aggregation. This is still a minuscule component of the overall pie, thus pull systems remain low in penetration. The end-to-end supply chain of cement must on the other hand streamline product concepts to market, rationalizing product portfolio and drive smart assortment plans and allocation strategies across the distribution chain. For this, a prediction of the market demand (almost on a daily basis) for each product in the portfolio while optimising inventory in a multi-echelon distribution channel comes as the most challenging task as cost effective throughput would mean logistics cost minimisation while that could raise the cost of working capital in the entire channel.
Streamlined processes Gaining access to tailored data, integrating signals well in advance and providing a positive supply to quickly meet demand requirements though smart allocation is where the current technologies are headed; local optima versus the global is where the blind spots confront the more onerous objectives of the business; thus inventory and receivable management could have a sharper tool as aids in decision support systems. The various channels have different purposes in the value chain; however, each task needs to support the overall corporate goals. As the number of channel partners increase, it is difficult to ensure that the channel partners are performing their specific roles as effectively as required. Aligning corporate objectives all through the chain remains a challenging task, especially with more sobering tasks mandated by Net Zero are already on the anvil. Driving sustainability together with the channel partners would ensure that accountability for the environment reaches to the furthest precincts of the channel right up to the customer; educating the customer on construction materials and sustainability then would be more comprehensive.
Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology
India is simultaneously grappling with two crises: a mounting waste emergency and an urgent need to decarbonise its most carbon-intensive industries. The cement sector, the second-largest in the world and the backbone of the nation’s infrastructure ambitions, sits at the centre of both. It consumes enormous quantities of fossil fuel, and it has the technical capacity to consume something else entirely: the waste our cities cannot get rid of.
According to CPCB and NITI Aayog projections, India generates approximately 62.4 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with that figure expected to reach 165 million tonnes by 2030. Much of this waste is energy-rich and non-recyclable. At the same time, cement kilns operate at material temperatures of approximately 1,450 degrees Celsius, with gas temperatures reaching 2,000 degrees. This high-temperature environment is ideal for co-processing, ensuring the complete thermal destruction of organic compounds without generating toxic residues. The physics are in our favour. The infrastructure is not.
Pre-processing is not the support act for co-processing. It is the main event. Get the particle size wrong, get the moisture wrong, get the calorific value wrong and your kiln thermal stability will suffer the consequences.
The Regulatory Push Is Real
The Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules 2026 mandate that cement plants progressively replace solid fossil fuels with Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), starting at a 5 per cent baseline and scaling to 15 per cent within six years. NITI Aayog’s 2026 Roadmap for Cement Sector Decarbonisation targets 20 to 25 per cent Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) by 2030. Beyond compliance, every tonne of coal replaced by RDF generates measurable carbon reductions which is monetisable under India’s emerging Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). TSR is no longer a sustainability metric. It is a financial lever.
Yet our own field assessments across multiple Indian cement plants reveal a sobering reality: the primary barrier to scaling AFR adoption is not waste availability. It is the fragmented and under-engineered pre-processing ecosystem that sits between the waste and the kiln.
Why Indian Waste Is a Different Engineering Problem
Indian municipal solid waste is not the material that imported shredding equipment was designed for. Our waste streams frequently exceed 40 per cent to 50 per cent moisture content, particularly during monsoon cycles, saturated with abrasive inerts including sand, glass, and stone. Plants relying on imported OEM equipment face months of downtime awaiting proprietary spare parts. Machines built for segregated, low-moisture waste fail quickly and disrupt the entire pre-processing operation in Indian conditions.
The two most common failures we observe are what I call the biting teeth problem and the chewing teeth problem. Plants relying solely on a primary shredder reduce bulk waste to large fractions, but the output remains too coarse for stable kiln combustion. Others attempt to use a secondary shredder as a standalone unit without a primary stage to pre-size the feed, leading to catastrophic mechanical failure. When both stages are present but mismatched in throughput capacity, the system becomes a bottleneck. Achieving the 40 to 70 tonnes per hour required for meaningful coal displacement demands a precisely coordinated two-stage process.
Engineering a Made-in-India Answer
At Fornnax, our response to these challenges is grounded in one principle: Indian waste demands Indian engineering. Our systems are built around feedstock homogeneity, the holy grail of kiln stability. Consistent particle size and predictable calorific value are the foundation of stable kiln combustion. Without them, no TSR target is achievable at scale.
Our SR-MAX2500 Dual Shaft Primary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive) processes raw, baled, or loosely mixed MSW, C&I waste, bulky waste, and plastics, reducing them to approximately 150 mm fractions at throughputs of up to 40 tonnes per hour. The R-MAX 3300 Single Shaft Secondary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive), introduced in 2025, takes that primary output and produces RDF fractions in the 30 to 80 mm range at up to 30 tonnes per hour, specifically optimised for consistent kiln feeding. We have also introduced electric drive configurations under the SR-100 HD series, with capacities between 5 and 40 tonnes per hour, already operational at a leading Indian waste-processing facility.
Looking ahead, Fornnax is expanding its portfolio with the upcoming SR-MAX3600 Hydraulic Drive primary shredder at up to 70 tonnes per hour and the R-MAX2100 Hydraulic drive secondary shredder at up to 20 tonnes per hour, designed specifically for the large-scale throughput that higher TSR ambitions require.
The Investment Case Is Now
The 2070 Net-Zero target is not a distant goal for India’s cement sector. It starts today, with decisions being made on the plant floor.
The SWM Rules 2026 are already in effect, requiring cement plants to replace coal with RDF. Carbon credit markets are opening up, and coal prices are not going to get cheaper. Every tonne of coal a cement plant replaces with waste-derived fuel saves money on one side and generates carbon credit revenue on the other. Pre-processing infrastructure is no longer just a compliance requirement. It is a business investment with a measurable return.
The good news is that nothing is missing. The technology works. The waste is available in every Indian city. The government has provided the policy direction. The only thing standing between where the industry is today and where it needs to be is the commitment to build the right infrastructure.
The cement companies that move now will not just meet the regulations. They will be ahead of every competitor that waits.
About The Author
Jignesh Kundaria is the Director and CEO of Fornnax Technology. Over an experience spanning more than two decades in the recycling industry, he has established himself as one of India’s foremost voices on waste-to-fuel technology and alternative fuel infrastructure.
The World Cement Association (WCA) has announced SiloConnect as its newest associate corporate member, expanding its network of technology providers supporting digitalisation in the cement industry. SiloConnect offers smart sensor technology that provides real-time visibility of cement inventory levels at customer silos, enabling producers to monitor stock remotely and plan deliveries more efficiently. The solution helps companies move from reactive to proactive logistics, improving delivery planning, operational efficiency and safety by reducing manual inspections. The technology is already used by major cement producers such as Holcim, Cemex and Heidelberg Materials and is deployed across more than 30 countries worldwide.
TotalEnergies and Holcim have commissioned a floating solar power plant in Obourg, Belgium, built on a rehabilitated former chalk quarry that has been converted into a lake. The project has a generation capacity of 31 MW and produces around 30 GWh of renewable electricity annually, which will be used to power Holcim’s nearby industrial operations. The project is currently the largest floating solar installation in Europe dedicated entirely to industrial self-consumption. To ensure minimal impact on the surrounding landscape, more than 700 metres of horizontal directional drilling were used to connect the solar installation to the electrical substation. The project reflects ongoing collaboration between the two companies to support industrial decarbonisation through renewable energy solutions and innovative infrastructure development.