What is the importance of packaging in cement production and distribution and what are the latest advancements that are taking place?
Cement is one of the largest bulk materials being handled on our planet. Producing a material in such massive quantities and distributing is a major logistic challenge. Filling speeds, pilferage, loss of product while handling, environment impact, shelf life, anti-counterfeiting, consumer pull and brand development are some of the attributes where packaging plays a major role. A well-designed packaging can help a cement producer work on all the issues effectively.
Latest generation technologies can help produce much lighter woven sacks for cement packaging without losing on strength or performance of the cement sack. Hot air sealed Block bottom bags (BB bags) growth worldwide has also seen development of newer concepts. Very interesting solutions are now available in the market, especially BOPP laminated BB bags have picked up very well in the market. These bags allow very high quality printing on the bags, even bags with metalised and holographic films are being used. BB bags with nonwoven fabric lamination and also with inner paper ply are also very interesting solutions for packing cement.
Multiwall paper-sack industry has seen a lot of development on paper and equipment side, making the solutions more robust and cost affective. Digital pasting is one solution where the glue consumption on paper sacks can be reduced drastically without compromising on bag strength. Digital pasting uses more precise gluing technology to help significantly reduce the glue costs and enhance sack qualities.
Cost is an important factor besides product loss and environmental factors in selection of packaging options in cement. How do various options stack up against all these parameters?
I would talk about the three most used variants in cement packaging in India and also most of the globe, i.e., uncoated sewn cement bags, multiwall paper sacks and hot air sealed block bottom bags (BB bags). Sewn cement bags are lower priced than BB bags (extrusion coated), and generally paper sacks are costlier. This is the general trend but eventual costs can depend on more variables.
But the eventual cost to end user or cement companies depend on various other factors besides only the direct bag costs, i.e., burstage of bags, leakers, pilferage, counterfeiting, etc., besides business opportunities in terms of margins, sales turnover, brand value, etc. We have seen cement companies prefer BB bags or multiwall solutions once the end user does a detailed analysis of eventual costs and benefits. The final solution being used also depends on raw material availability, logistics available, storage conditions, climatic conditions, and the biggest of them all, i.e., solutions preferred by the end user.
Speed in packaging process can save on time and resources. Which packaging material is best suited for mechanised handling and/or deployment of automation? A packaging solution which has strict dimensional tolerance control and has lesser number of ply would be more suited for automated filling systems. Automated systems are designed to handle a given specification of bags, if bags deviate from these specifications then the automated bag handling systems may show errors or stoppages.
Also cement packing is air assisted, the more the number of layers a packaging solution will have the more difficult it generally gets for the air to escape from the bag thus reducing filling speeds. Well-designed perforation systems on multiply bags or high-porous paper can help overcome this problem.
What are the challenges conventional cement packaging systems like PP, paper and HDPE bags are facing? How anti-plastic and biodegradability movement will impact packaging in future?
Woven cement sacks are used multiple times after the primary function is utilised. Also the family of plastics used for producing woven sacks are single family polyolefins, so recyclability is very easy. Besides, plastic has other benefits and is an outstanding material. Higher value of empty cement bags also help in easier collection than some other products.
We believe that woven bag consumption for cement packaging will keep growing due to above reasons, especially in India.
What is the importance of look and feel of the packaging material and printability in improving the visibility and promotion of the product?
The cement market is also very competitive. Cement brands have to work hard to get the cement from production sites to various construction sites within the country. A lot of cement is directly sold to consumers. In such dynamics, it gets very important how the cement bag is looking. Growing consumption of BOPP-laminated cement bags in the Indian market depicts the consumer pull towards better looking packaging solutions.
Please share any case studies or product highlights you have for your packaging lines? How is your equipment better than other products in the market?
We have seen very good growth of BB bags in the Indian cement industry. Around 20 per cent of cement in India is packed in these or similar bags. The consumption has been growing regularly despite higher bag costs as compared to the more prevalent uncoated sewn sacks. We expect further growth in this segment, the cement industry is now further graduating to aesthetically better looking and technologically even more advanced solutions for packing cement.
Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology
India is simultaneously grappling with two crises: a mounting waste emergency and an urgent need to decarbonise its most carbon-intensive industries. The cement sector, the second-largest in the world and the backbone of the nation’s infrastructure ambitions, sits at the centre of both. It consumes enormous quantities of fossil fuel, and it has the technical capacity to consume something else entirely: the waste our cities cannot get rid of.
According to CPCB and NITI Aayog projections, India generates approximately 62.4 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with that figure expected to reach 165 million tonnes by 2030. Much of this waste is energy-rich and non-recyclable. At the same time, cement kilns operate at material temperatures of approximately 1,450 degrees Celsius, with gas temperatures reaching 2,000 degrees. This high-temperature environment is ideal for co-processing, ensuring the complete thermal destruction of organic compounds without generating toxic residues. The physics are in our favour. The infrastructure is not.
Pre-processing is not the support act for co-processing. It is the main event. Get the particle size wrong, get the moisture wrong, get the calorific value wrong and your kiln thermal stability will suffer the consequences.
The Regulatory Push Is Real
The Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules 2026 mandate that cement plants progressively replace solid fossil fuels with Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), starting at a 5 per cent baseline and scaling to 15 per cent within six years. NITI Aayog’s 2026 Roadmap for Cement Sector Decarbonisation targets 20 to 25 per cent Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) by 2030. Beyond compliance, every tonne of coal replaced by RDF generates measurable carbon reductions which is monetisable under India’s emerging Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). TSR is no longer a sustainability metric. It is a financial lever.
Yet our own field assessments across multiple Indian cement plants reveal a sobering reality: the primary barrier to scaling AFR adoption is not waste availability. It is the fragmented and under-engineered pre-processing ecosystem that sits between the waste and the kiln.
Why Indian Waste Is a Different Engineering Problem
Indian municipal solid waste is not the material that imported shredding equipment was designed for. Our waste streams frequently exceed 40 per cent to 50 per cent moisture content, particularly during monsoon cycles, saturated with abrasive inerts including sand, glass, and stone. Plants relying on imported OEM equipment face months of downtime awaiting proprietary spare parts. Machines built for segregated, low-moisture waste fail quickly and disrupt the entire pre-processing operation in Indian conditions.
The two most common failures we observe are what I call the biting teeth problem and the chewing teeth problem. Plants relying solely on a primary shredder reduce bulk waste to large fractions, but the output remains too coarse for stable kiln combustion. Others attempt to use a secondary shredder as a standalone unit without a primary stage to pre-size the feed, leading to catastrophic mechanical failure. When both stages are present but mismatched in throughput capacity, the system becomes a bottleneck. Achieving the 40 to 70 tonnes per hour required for meaningful coal displacement demands a precisely coordinated two-stage process.
Engineering a Made-in-India Answer
At Fornnax, our response to these challenges is grounded in one principle: Indian waste demands Indian engineering. Our systems are built around feedstock homogeneity, the holy grail of kiln stability. Consistent particle size and predictable calorific value are the foundation of stable kiln combustion. Without them, no TSR target is achievable at scale.
Our SR-MAX2500 Dual Shaft Primary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive) processes raw, baled, or loosely mixed MSW, C&I waste, bulky waste, and plastics, reducing them to approximately 150 mm fractions at throughputs of up to 40 tonnes per hour. The R-MAX 3300 Single Shaft Secondary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive), introduced in 2025, takes that primary output and produces RDF fractions in the 30 to 80 mm range at up to 30 tonnes per hour, specifically optimised for consistent kiln feeding. We have also introduced electric drive configurations under the SR-100 HD series, with capacities between 5 and 40 tonnes per hour, already operational at a leading Indian waste-processing facility.
Looking ahead, Fornnax is expanding its portfolio with the upcoming SR-MAX3600 Hydraulic Drive primary shredder at up to 70 tonnes per hour and the R-MAX2100 Hydraulic drive secondary shredder at up to 20 tonnes per hour, designed specifically for the large-scale throughput that higher TSR ambitions require.
The Investment Case Is Now
The 2070 Net-Zero target is not a distant goal for India’s cement sector. It starts today, with decisions being made on the plant floor.
The SWM Rules 2026 are already in effect, requiring cement plants to replace coal with RDF. Carbon credit markets are opening up, and coal prices are not going to get cheaper. Every tonne of coal a cement plant replaces with waste-derived fuel saves money on one side and generates carbon credit revenue on the other. Pre-processing infrastructure is no longer just a compliance requirement. It is a business investment with a measurable return.
The good news is that nothing is missing. The technology works. The waste is available in every Indian city. The government has provided the policy direction. The only thing standing between where the industry is today and where it needs to be is the commitment to build the right infrastructure.
The cement companies that move now will not just meet the regulations. They will be ahead of every competitor that waits.
About The Author
Jignesh Kundaria is the Director and CEO of Fornnax Technology. Over an experience spanning more than two decades in the recycling industry, he has established himself as one of India’s foremost voices on waste-to-fuel technology and alternative fuel infrastructure.
The World Cement Association (WCA) has announced SiloConnect as its newest associate corporate member, expanding its network of technology providers supporting digitalisation in the cement industry. SiloConnect offers smart sensor technology that provides real-time visibility of cement inventory levels at customer silos, enabling producers to monitor stock remotely and plan deliveries more efficiently. The solution helps companies move from reactive to proactive logistics, improving delivery planning, operational efficiency and safety by reducing manual inspections. The technology is already used by major cement producers such as Holcim, Cemex and Heidelberg Materials and is deployed across more than 30 countries worldwide.
TotalEnergies and Holcim have commissioned a floating solar power plant in Obourg, Belgium, built on a rehabilitated former chalk quarry that has been converted into a lake. The project has a generation capacity of 31 MW and produces around 30 GWh of renewable electricity annually, which will be used to power Holcim’s nearby industrial operations. The project is currently the largest floating solar installation in Europe dedicated entirely to industrial self-consumption. To ensure minimal impact on the surrounding landscape, more than 700 metres of horizontal directional drilling were used to connect the solar installation to the electrical substation. The project reflects ongoing collaboration between the two companies to support industrial decarbonisation through renewable energy solutions and innovative infrastructure development.