Vaibhav Agarwal of PhillipCapital assess the potential of JKLC.
JK Lakshmi (JKLC) currently has a total installed capacity of 12.5 MTPA, which is spread across the geographies of North (inclusive of Gujarat) and East India. North India has a total capacity of 9.8 MTPA of which 1.6 MTPA is at UCWL – JKLC’s 71 per cent subsidiary. UCWL plant has been very recently commissioned and the utilisations of this plant are being ramped up -currently operates at approximately 50-60 per cent. East India has a capacity of 2.7 MTPA (of which 0.9 MTPA of grinding recently commissioned production in Q1FY18). Another 0.6 MTPA of capacity addition (grinding unit) is due to be added in Odisha (East India) and slated to be commissioned by mid FY19. Once this is commissioned, JKLC’s total capacity will increase to 13.1 MTPA – 9.8 MTPA in North India and 3.3 MTPA in East India.
Current capacity utilisation
JKLC’s north unit are currently operating at an average utilisation of 70 per cent versus industry’s capacity utilisation of 68 per cent in this region. Similarly, JKLC’s east India plants are currently operating at 79 per cent utilisations as against industry capacity utilisation of 67 per cent. As per our understanding, UCWL and the newer grinding unit of JKLC in North (Gujarat) and East India respectively are yet to scale up capacity utilisations and currently operate at just about 50-60 per cent capacity utilisations.
Volume growth trajectory and utilisation roadmap is driven by capacity additions over the past few years JKLC’s volume’s has been robust over the past few years (7-17 per cent). As we now see the capacity additions getting muted for JKLC we expect the volume growth to taper down and grow in the range of 5-6 per cent over the next two years. But, we also expect capacity utilisations of newer units of JKLC to ramp up to the existing levels by end of FY19 (a key to drive cost savings) and expect overall utilisations of the company as a whole at approximately 83 per cent by end of FY19/H1FY20.
Contributors to cost savings for JKLC will derive cost savings from multiple factors – power cost, utilisation ramp up and logistics costs. Waste Heat recovery at East India has commissioned commercial production in Q3FY18 and the management has indicated a savings of about Rs 100/tonne already being delivered from this initiative. UCWL is also due to commission a WHR and thermal power plant. In East India, thermal power plants are due for commissioning in H2FY19.
Major chunk of the savings will come from here in H2FY19 and onwards. JKLC has acknowledged that it needs to make its logistics more effective and is working towards a cost saving of Rs 100-150/tonne. Though a major chunk of this will be again from East India operations, North will also contribute to logistics savings as and when we see utilisation ramp up of UCWL and newer grinding units (Surat) in this zone. Utilisation ramp up will help scale efficiencies. As per the interactions, the least which can be expected as a ballpark is about Rs10/tonne of savings with every percentage increase of utilisation ramp up. This can be higher and will vary on case to case basis.
Utilisations and volume roadmap
JKLC currently operates its capacities at an average capacity utilisation of 72 per cent. It estimates for JKLC factor in an overall utilisation improvement of about 10 per cent over the next two years. As nearly 25 per cent of JKLC’s existing capacity is new, we believe this utilisation ramp up is possible. It can also be seen from the graphs below that JKLC is always ahead of industry capacity utilisations in all regions of its operations.
Though the utilisations are being ramped up by nearly 10 per cent over the next two years, but from volume growth perspective, the volume growth will taper down at 5-6 per cent yoy as JKLC exits its capex mode and fall in-line to industry discipline. Low volume growth is largely because of base effect and a more realistic assumption. Despite a low volume growth, JKLC will start deriving all the cost savings in FY19 and onwards as all the support infrastructure such as captive power, better logistics etc. will be available to the company by mid FY19. We will now discuss the cost saving drivers individually.
Cost savings drivers, power
As far as efficiencies are concerned, JKLC is already best placed on consumption parameters. It consumes approximately 70-74 units of power per tonne of cement across all locations, which is largely in-line with best of industry parameters. The key hurdle is absence of power plants in two of its existing locations – East India site and UCWL. Our interactions suggests us that for Eastern operations, the cost of power for JKLC is as high as Rs 7.5-8 per unit as against an internal cost of generation of approximately Rs 3.5-4/unit. This translates to savings of approximately Rs 4 per unit of power and approximately Rs 280-300/tonne for East India operations standalone. At UCWL as well, JKLC is likely to deliver a savings of approximately Rs 2.5 per unit as and when its captive power unit starts generation. This is all likely to be completed by mid FY19.
Waste Heat Recovery at East India has already commissioned commercial production in Q3FY18. Management has indicated a savings of about Rs 100/tonne already accumulating from Q3FY18 for eastern operations. This number has the potential to increase as we see capacity ramp-up of the newer grinding unit at East India. On our current volume assumptions for FY20, JKLC is likely to deliver power savings of approximately Rs 1.16 billion by end of FY20, which converges to an EBITDA/tonne of approximately Rs 110 per tonne at consolidated company level. We are also factoring in a 20 per cent reduction in Waste Heat Recovery savings as the WHR will reach optimum utilisations with ramp up of capacity utilisations.
Utilisation scale up
As a ballpark, the minimum savings expected out of every percentage increase in capacity utilisation is Rs 10 per tonne. This is the least and the savings can be much higher and will vary on case to case basis. At consolidated level, for JKLC, we expect utilisations to improve by nearly 10 per cent . However, the picture looks different on a plant-wise basis.
JKLC’s UCWL plant is likely to see utilisation ramp up of 20-25 per cent while the other two plants in North and East India will see an increase of utilisations of 1-10 per cent. Most of the utilisation ramp up will be a function of recent capacity additions. At Rs 10 per tonne of cost savings with scale efficiencies, JKLC will deliver a cost savings of approximately Rs 920 million by FY20 translating to savings of about Rs 90 per tonne.
Logistics
On logistics front, JKLC has opportunities of installing railway sidings at East India. It is also recalibrating its lead distances and relooking and renegotiating its contracts and arrangements with transporters. As a company, JKLC has guided for cost savings of approximately Rs100-150 per tonne in logistics over the next 12-18 months.
Opportunities will logistics costs savings will become more visible as and when all the newer plants of JKLC reach optimum utilisations.
We will now summarise the potential of cost savings for each of the cost heads on a plant wise basis. Our estimates in the following table are conservative and we have not yet factored in any incremental savings on account of further reduction in power consumption/tonne (which is quite possible as JKLC increases production of blended cement – especially composite cement). We have assumed only Rs10 per tonne of savings with every percentage increase in capacity utilisations which can also be higher. We have factored in only 50 per cent of the minimum targeted savings in logistics by the management (Rs 100-150per tonne). Our calculations suggest that we can remain fairly confident of minimum Rs 250per tonne of cost savings through internal measures.
Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology
India is simultaneously grappling with two crises: a mounting waste emergency and an urgent need to decarbonise its most carbon-intensive industries. The cement sector, the second-largest in the world and the backbone of the nation’s infrastructure ambitions, sits at the centre of both. It consumes enormous quantities of fossil fuel, and it has the technical capacity to consume something else entirely: the waste our cities cannot get rid of.
According to CPCB and NITI Aayog projections, India generates approximately 62.4 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with that figure expected to reach 165 million tonnes by 2030. Much of this waste is energy-rich and non-recyclable. At the same time, cement kilns operate at material temperatures of approximately 1,450 degrees Celsius, with gas temperatures reaching 2,000 degrees. This high-temperature environment is ideal for co-processing, ensuring the complete thermal destruction of organic compounds without generating toxic residues. The physics are in our favour. The infrastructure is not.
Pre-processing is not the support act for co-processing. It is the main event. Get the particle size wrong, get the moisture wrong, get the calorific value wrong and your kiln thermal stability will suffer the consequences.
The Regulatory Push Is Real
The Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules 2026 mandate that cement plants progressively replace solid fossil fuels with Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), starting at a 5 per cent baseline and scaling to 15 per cent within six years. NITI Aayog’s 2026 Roadmap for Cement Sector Decarbonisation targets 20 to 25 per cent Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) by 2030. Beyond compliance, every tonne of coal replaced by RDF generates measurable carbon reductions which is monetisable under India’s emerging Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). TSR is no longer a sustainability metric. It is a financial lever.
Yet our own field assessments across multiple Indian cement plants reveal a sobering reality: the primary barrier to scaling AFR adoption is not waste availability. It is the fragmented and under-engineered pre-processing ecosystem that sits between the waste and the kiln.
Why Indian Waste Is a Different Engineering Problem
Indian municipal solid waste is not the material that imported shredding equipment was designed for. Our waste streams frequently exceed 40 per cent to 50 per cent moisture content, particularly during monsoon cycles, saturated with abrasive inerts including sand, glass, and stone. Plants relying on imported OEM equipment face months of downtime awaiting proprietary spare parts. Machines built for segregated, low-moisture waste fail quickly and disrupt the entire pre-processing operation in Indian conditions.
The two most common failures we observe are what I call the biting teeth problem and the chewing teeth problem. Plants relying solely on a primary shredder reduce bulk waste to large fractions, but the output remains too coarse for stable kiln combustion. Others attempt to use a secondary shredder as a standalone unit without a primary stage to pre-size the feed, leading to catastrophic mechanical failure. When both stages are present but mismatched in throughput capacity, the system becomes a bottleneck. Achieving the 40 to 70 tonnes per hour required for meaningful coal displacement demands a precisely coordinated two-stage process.
Engineering a Made-in-India Answer
At Fornnax, our response to these challenges is grounded in one principle: Indian waste demands Indian engineering. Our systems are built around feedstock homogeneity, the holy grail of kiln stability. Consistent particle size and predictable calorific value are the foundation of stable kiln combustion. Without them, no TSR target is achievable at scale.
Our SR-MAX2500 Dual Shaft Primary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive) processes raw, baled, or loosely mixed MSW, C&I waste, bulky waste, and plastics, reducing them to approximately 150 mm fractions at throughputs of up to 40 tonnes per hour. The R-MAX 3300 Single Shaft Secondary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive), introduced in 2025, takes that primary output and produces RDF fractions in the 30 to 80 mm range at up to 30 tonnes per hour, specifically optimised for consistent kiln feeding. We have also introduced electric drive configurations under the SR-100 HD series, with capacities between 5 and 40 tonnes per hour, already operational at a leading Indian waste-processing facility.
Looking ahead, Fornnax is expanding its portfolio with the upcoming SR-MAX3600 Hydraulic Drive primary shredder at up to 70 tonnes per hour and the R-MAX2100 Hydraulic drive secondary shredder at up to 20 tonnes per hour, designed specifically for the large-scale throughput that higher TSR ambitions require.
The Investment Case Is Now
The 2070 Net-Zero target is not a distant goal for India’s cement sector. It starts today, with decisions being made on the plant floor.
The SWM Rules 2026 are already in effect, requiring cement plants to replace coal with RDF. Carbon credit markets are opening up, and coal prices are not going to get cheaper. Every tonne of coal a cement plant replaces with waste-derived fuel saves money on one side and generates carbon credit revenue on the other. Pre-processing infrastructure is no longer just a compliance requirement. It is a business investment with a measurable return.
The good news is that nothing is missing. The technology works. The waste is available in every Indian city. The government has provided the policy direction. The only thing standing between where the industry is today and where it needs to be is the commitment to build the right infrastructure.
The cement companies that move now will not just meet the regulations. They will be ahead of every competitor that waits.
About The Author
Jignesh Kundaria is the Director and CEO of Fornnax Technology. Over an experience spanning more than two decades in the recycling industry, he has established himself as one of India’s foremost voices on waste-to-fuel technology and alternative fuel infrastructure.
The World Cement Association (WCA) has announced SiloConnect as its newest associate corporate member, expanding its network of technology providers supporting digitalisation in the cement industry. SiloConnect offers smart sensor technology that provides real-time visibility of cement inventory levels at customer silos, enabling producers to monitor stock remotely and plan deliveries more efficiently. The solution helps companies move from reactive to proactive logistics, improving delivery planning, operational efficiency and safety by reducing manual inspections. The technology is already used by major cement producers such as Holcim, Cemex and Heidelberg Materials and is deployed across more than 30 countries worldwide.
TotalEnergies and Holcim have commissioned a floating solar power plant in Obourg, Belgium, built on a rehabilitated former chalk quarry that has been converted into a lake. The project has a generation capacity of 31 MW and produces around 30 GWh of renewable electricity annually, which will be used to power Holcim’s nearby industrial operations. The project is currently the largest floating solar installation in Europe dedicated entirely to industrial self-consumption. To ensure minimal impact on the surrounding landscape, more than 700 metres of horizontal directional drilling were used to connect the solar installation to the electrical substation. The project reflects ongoing collaboration between the two companies to support industrial decarbonisation through renewable energy solutions and innovative infrastructure development.