Connect with us

Economy & Market

The great logistics opportunity

Published

on

Shares

Port-led industrial development of the country is the new mantra of the Modi government, where the emphasis is on usage of sea routes and waterways. This throws up fresh opportunities for the cement industry to reduce logistics costs.

The domestic cement industry has already reached the best of operating parameters, and there is very little scope to improve efficiencies to reduce cost. One of the options available is to reduce distribution cost. Further, fierce competition in the crowded marketplace keeps pushing managements to find effective ways to lower costs.

Logistics is a key cost differentiator, and the cement company that can master the art of delivering cement at the lowest cost will be the winner in the market. Cement transportation by water throws up many opportunities. For more details, refer to the elaborate interview of industry veteran Sumit Banerjee elsewhere in this issue.

As the commodity cost of cement is quite low, the transportation cost is a key factor in competitively supplying customers with cement. Waterborne transportation has remarkably lower costs than rail or road transportation, but substantial infrastructure is required to load and unload ships. The cost is dependent on distance, ship size and several other factors, but the most important parameter is the market condition on the required trading route.

Inward logistics includes coal and limestone transportation, while outward logistics is mostly the final product, cement. Some companies also incur outbound logistics cost of transporting clinker to their grinding plants.

The Indian cement industry is the second largest in the world after China, with a total capacity of close to 350 MT and plays a major role in the development of the nation. Therefore, considering the role of the industry in the economy?s development, it is necessary to incentivise bulk transportation and thereby optimise cost, save fuel and reduce carbon emission, while ensuring safe carriage.

General cargo ships are also available in a wide range of type and sizes. For distribution on inland waterways, there are barges or small self-propelled ships in ranges from 200 to 2,500 tonnes. For cement transport in coastal regions, ships between 1,000 and 7,000 tonne cargo capacity are available.

On the other hand, there is no mechanisation process in India, in spite of the wishes of the industry. Here the government has to play an active role. Industry on its own cannot make mechanisation happen. It should be a collaborative effort. In the short run, mechanisation will create disturbance, but in the long run, every stakeholder will be befitted. People need to be educated and prepared to face these short-term disturbances. Mechanisation can alone reduce cost by a minimum of 10 per cent. Cement producers currently evacuate around 3,000 tonnes by the manual route from railway/goods sheds, just because systems are not mechanised. In today?s context, labour is already becoming a scare commodity, so the industry should be prepared for such an eventuality in 2018-2020. Transporting cement by the sea route will easily provide a window for mechanisation.

Cement transportation through water can be done using either general cargo ships (ships that are suitable to handle all kinds of bulk cargo) or specialist ships that only carry cement and have their own loading and unloading equipment. Dispatching bagged cement is relatively easier compared to loose cement. The specialist ships to carry loose cement are called cement carriers, and are available in a large range of sizes and types (see Rama Murthy Nety?s interview for more details).

Transporting cement through such ships is already a popular concept. Self-discharging cement carriers (small inland barges) can support cargo capacity of 300 tonnes. The largest self-discharging cement carriers have a cargo capacity of 40,000 tonnes. There are many companies like KGJ Cement and BIMCO Cement Carriers, and a number of others on the international scene, who are specialists in cement transport.

Pneumatic Self-Unloaders
Pneumatic self-unloading vessels are built specifically to handle powder cargoes such as cement. Using lean-phase or dense-phase pneumatic conveying systems, they operate using compressed air to move the cargo through piping to load and unload. Both the loading and unloading processes are completely enclosed, and this type of vessel is expected to operate completely in a dust-free environment. From an environmental standpoint, this is one of the most effective methods of transporting cement by sea.

The pneumatic conveying technology on the ship is matched with the systems on shore to account for pipeline restrictions and high volumes of air. This ensures optimum loading and discharging rates – typically 1,500 t/hr.

Handling and Transporting Cement
The cargo holds of the pneumatic self-unloaders have sloping bottom surfaces fitted with air slides. Cement powder is fluidised when compressed air is injected into the air slides below the cargo, and the sloping surfaces of the cargo hold move the cement toward the center tunnel for discharging.

Rotary valves and cement screws in the tunnel inject the cement into the discharge piping where high volumes of transport air move the cement and carry it in suspension through the discharge pipelines to a storage silo ashore. The same pipelines are used to load the vessel through a single point. Distribution pipes on the vessel direct the cement powder into the hold to be loaded, and large dust collectors are used to evacuate the transported air from the holds, and filter out the dust. The instrumentation and use of IT finds its way in handling ship fleets. The systems are today equipped with remote diagnostics, which engineers based on land can access. General bulk carriers are very suitable for retrofitting cement-handling equipment and any size of second hand bulk carrier can quickly and easily be converted into a self-loading and unloading cement carrier at a much lower overall cost than a new ship.

Today, 70 per cent of the cement movement worldwide is by sea compared to just 1-2 per cent in India. However, the scenario is changing with most of the big players like UltraTech, Ambuja and Sanghi having set up their bulk terminals.

Currently, around 60 per cent of cement in India is transported using roads – the costliest of the transportation modes at around Rs 1.5 per tonne per kilometre.

For every 50-kg bag of cement, the logistics cost comes to around Rs 18-25 by road and Rs 12-15 by railway, depending on the distance. For example, the country?s third-largest cement maker, Ambuja Cements, has opted for sea-routes to transport its cement from Gujarat to the southern market.

Success stories
In India, the credit of using the sea route for transporting cement/clinker can be given to the Chowgules of erstwhile Narmada Cement, which set up the country?s first split location plant. Later on, Ambuja Cements, which had a coast-based plant, started using the sea route to feed the Mumbai market, and has very effectively created a dominant space in the western market – especially in and around the state capital.

The full credit has to be given to Narotam Sekhsaria for his vision. Today Ambuja does not have any plant in the southern region, yet it is supplying material to those markets only because it uses the sea route. Now, Ambuja Cements, as a part of cement giant LafargeHolcim, is expected to do much better and find different ways of using water routes for transporting cement. LafargeHolcim has been using the sea route in other places of the world, and is well suited to this operation, compared to other local players. Not to be left behind, UltraTech has also exploited the sea to transport cement after taking over L&T?s cement business.

Today, the water route is being used by mainly Ambuja, UltraTech and Sanghi Cement. Sanghi is a smaller volume player compared to the other two, but it has very ambitious plans for moving cement by sea. With its cement production running smoothly, the company has plans to improve its distribution side through more focus on logistics, with more investment on coastal movement for domestic as well as foreign markets. In fact, Sanghi has started moving its cement through coastal shipping. Earlier, it had major plans to export cement to neighbouring countries, but this business route is not lucrative any more, thanks to the plunging global prices of cement.

Sanghi Cement has the distinction of being the only cement company to receive an Export House status in the first eight months of commencement of operations. Another experiment carried out by Cochin Port Trust is worth mentioning. The surplus land with the port trust has been leased out to cement companies to set up bulk cement terminals.

In conclusion, a solution for Europe will not be suitable for Indonesia, a solution for the UK will not be an ideal solution for Bangladesh, and a solution for the USA will not be feasible for India. We need to find our own solutions to reduce the logistics cost of cement, either through waterways or rail.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy & Market

TSR Will Define Which Cement Companies Win India’s Net-Zero Race

Published

on

By

Shares

Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology

India is simultaneously grappling with two crises: a mounting waste emergency and an urgent need to decarbonise its most carbon-intensive industries. The cement sector, the second-largest in the world and the backbone of the nation’s infrastructure ambitions, sits at the centre of both. It consumes enormous quantities of fossil fuel, and it has the technical capacity to consume something else entirely: the waste our cities cannot get rid of.

According to CPCB and NITI Aayog projections, India generates approximately 62.4 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with that figure expected to reach 165 million tonnes by 2030. Much of this waste is energy-rich and non-recyclable. At the same time, cement kilns operate at material temperatures of approximately 1,450 degrees Celsius, with gas temperatures reaching 2,000 degrees. This high-temperature environment is ideal for co-processing, ensuring the complete thermal destruction of organic compounds without generating toxic residues. The physics are in our favour. The infrastructure is not.

Pre-processing is not the support act for co-processing. It is the main event. Get the particle size wrong, get the moisture wrong, get the calorific value wrong and your kiln thermal stability will suffer the consequences.

The Regulatory Push Is Real

The Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules 2026 mandate that cement plants progressively replace solid fossil fuels with Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), starting at a 5 per cent baseline and scaling to 15 per cent within six years. NITI Aayog’s 2026 Roadmap for Cement Sector Decarbonisation targets 20 to 25 per cent Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) by 2030. Beyond compliance, every tonne of coal replaced by RDF generates measurable carbon reductions which is monetisable under India’s emerging Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). TSR is no longer a sustainability metric. It is a financial lever.

Yet our own field assessments across multiple Indian cement plants reveal a sobering reality: the primary barrier to scaling AFR adoption is not waste availability. It is the fragmented and under-engineered pre-processing ecosystem that sits between the waste and the kiln.

Why Indian Waste Is a Different Engineering Problem

Indian municipal solid waste is not the material that imported shredding equipment was designed for. Our waste streams frequently exceed 40 per cent to 50 per cent moisture content, particularly during monsoon cycles, saturated with abrasive inerts including sand, glass, and stone. Plants relying on imported OEM equipment face months of downtime awaiting proprietary spare parts. Machines built for segregated, low-moisture waste fail quickly and disrupt the entire pre-processing operation in Indian conditions.

The two most common failures we observe are what I call the biting teeth problem and the chewing teeth problem. Plants relying solely on a primary shredder reduce bulk waste to large fractions, but the output remains too coarse for stable kiln combustion. Others attempt to use a secondary shredder as a standalone unit without a primary stage to pre-size the feed, leading to catastrophic mechanical failure. When both stages are present but mismatched in throughput capacity, the system becomes a bottleneck. Achieving the 40 to 70 tonnes per hour required for meaningful coal displacement demands a precisely coordinated two-stage process.

Engineering a Made-in-India Answer

At Fornnax, our response to these challenges is grounded in one principle: Indian waste demands Indian engineering. Our systems are built around feedstock homogeneity, the holy grail of kiln stability. Consistent particle size and predictable calorific value are the foundation of stable kiln combustion. Without them, no TSR target is achievable at scale.

Our SR-MAX2500 Dual Shaft Primary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive) processes raw, baled, or loosely mixed MSW, C&I waste, bulky waste, and plastics, reducing them to approximately 150 mm fractions at throughputs of up to 40 tonnes per hour. The R-MAX 3300 Single Shaft Secondary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive), introduced in 2025, takes that primary output and produces RDF fractions in the 30 to 80 mm range at up to 30 tonnes per hour, specifically optimised for consistent kiln feeding. We have also introduced electric drive configurations under the SR-100 HD series, with capacities between 5 and 40 tonnes per hour, already operational at a leading Indian waste-processing facility.

Looking ahead, Fornnax is expanding its portfolio with the upcoming SR-MAX3600 Hydraulic Drive primary shredder at up to 70 tonnes per hour and the R-MAX2100 Hydraulic drive secondary shredder at up to 20 tonnes per hour, designed specifically for the large-scale throughput that higher TSR ambitions require.

The Investment Case Is Now

The 2070 Net-Zero target is not a distant goal for India’s cement sector. It starts today, with decisions being made on the plant floor.

The SWM Rules 2026 are already in effect, requiring cement plants to replace coal with RDF. Carbon credit markets are opening up, and coal prices are not going to get cheaper. Every tonne of coal a cement plant replaces with waste-derived fuel saves money on one side and generates carbon credit revenue on the other. Pre-processing infrastructure is no longer just a compliance requirement. It is a business investment with a measurable return.

The good news is that nothing is missing. The technology works. The waste is available in every Indian city. The government has provided the policy direction. The only thing standing between where the industry is today and where it needs to be is the commitment to build the right infrastructure.

The cement companies that move now will not just meet the regulations. They will be ahead of every competitor that waits.

About The Author

Jignesh Kundaria is the Director and CEO of Fornnax Technology. Over an experience spanning more than two decades in the recycling industry, he has established himself as one of India’s foremost voices on waste-to-fuel technology and alternative fuel infrastructure.

Continue Reading

Concrete

WCA Welcomes SiloConnect as associate corporate member

Published

on

By

Shares

The World Cement Association (WCA) has announced SiloConnect as its newest associate corporate member, expanding its network of technology providers supporting digitalisation in the cement industry. SiloConnect offers smart sensor technology that provides real-time visibility of cement inventory levels at customer silos, enabling producers to monitor stock remotely and plan deliveries more efficiently. The solution helps companies move from reactive to proactive logistics, improving delivery planning, operational efficiency and safety by reducing manual inspections. The technology is already used by major cement producers such as Holcim, Cemex and Heidelberg Materials and is deployed across more than 30 countries worldwide.

Continue Reading

Concrete

TotalEnergies and Holcim Launch Floating Solar Plant in Belgium

Published

on

By

Shares

TotalEnergies and Holcim have commissioned a floating solar power plant in Obourg, Belgium, built on a rehabilitated former chalk quarry that has been converted into a lake. The project has a generation capacity of 31 MW and produces around 30 GWh of renewable electricity annually, which will be used to power Holcim’s nearby industrial operations. The project is currently the largest floating solar installation in Europe dedicated entirely to industrial self-consumption. To ensure minimal impact on the surrounding landscape, more than 700 metres of horizontal directional drilling were used to connect the solar installation to the electrical substation. The project reflects ongoing collaboration between the two companies to support industrial decarbonisation through renewable energy solutions and innovative infrastructure development.

Continue Reading

Video Thumbnail
â–¶

    SIGN-UP FOR OUR GENERAL NEWSLETTER


    Trending News

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

     

    Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

     


      This will close in 0 seconds