Rajesh Kumar Nayma, Assistant General Manager – Environment, Wonder Cement, shares the company’s ambitious commitment to reducing emissions through advanced technology and alternative fuel use, thereby driving significant change in the cement industry.
How does your company address the environmental impact of cement production, particularly in terms of reducing emissions?
Wonder Cement Limited (WCL) has played a vital role in Indian infrastructure development and focuses towards a more sustainable future, including environment protection, clean energy and water positivity. The organisation is a firm believer in putting a positive impact on the environment. Environment and sustainability is a core value that drives our operations. We are committed to minimising the environmental impact from cement production, particularly when it comes to emissions. We do the impact analysis due to operation of the units being carried out at design stage level to ensure minimum impact on the environment i.e. air, water and land. Equipment selection is done accordingly taking various measures to ensure no fugitive emission, stack emission, water pollution and soil degradation such as installation of best-in-class air pollution control equipment (ESP’s Reverse Air Baghouse); bag filters at all the material transfer points; provided covered storage facilities/storage silos to maintain ambient air quality; fugitive emission and stack emission well within the prescribed emission Norms, Selective Non Catalytic Reactor (SNCR) for control of NOx Emission; and preventive routine maintenance of air pollution control equipment are carried out. By taking these measures, WCL ensures emissions are well below the stipulated norms for particulate matter, SO2 and NOx.
We are focusing on reducing the GreenHouse Gases (GHG) emissions, too. Due to our operations, we have done GHG Invertisation, which aims to achieve Net Zero by 2060, in line with the nation’s commitment in COP-26.
We have Zero Liquid Discharges facilities across all our units. Being dry process cement manufacturing units, the wastewater generation in our units is very low in quantum and the implemented closed-loop systems help to reuse process water and minimise fresh water consumption. WCL is reusing 100 per cent STP/ETP water in its process, greenbelt development and dust suppression at its integrated cement plant and split grinding units.
What measures have been implemented to monitor and control emissions of CO2, NOx, and particulate matter during the cement manufacturing process?
We have installed an Online Continuous Stack Monitoring System (OCEMS) in all the process stacks along with PTZ cameras and Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Systems (CAAQMS) in all our operating units. Real time data of OCEMS/CAAQMS is transmitted to SPCB/CPCB servers, and also to our control systems, which enables us to take corrective action on priority.
The major pollutants through air are particulate matter and gaseous emissions. The emissions of particulate matters from all the stacks are maintained within the prescribed norms by installing bag house, bag filters and electorstatic precipitator (ESP) at all major sources of air pollution i.e. raw mill, kiln, clinker cooler and coal mill cement mills and captive power plant (CPP).
We have also installed SNCR technology along with a low NOx burner to reduce NOx emissions effectively to keep the same in the prescribed norms and lime dosing systems have been installed in the power plants to ensure SO2 emission within the prescribed norms.
We use alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR) in order to increase our green energy portfolio, to reduce the clinker factor and to reduce the power/energy consumption per tonne of clinker/cement. The installation of WHRB in all the operating kilns has further helped in cutting down the CO2 emissions.
Can you elaborate on the role of alternative fuels and raw materials in reducing the environmental footprint of cement production?
The use of AFR plays a critical role in our strategy to reduce the environmental footprint of cement production. By substituting traditional fossil fuels with waste-derived alternatives like biomass, refuse-derived fuel (RDF) and industrial by-products, we significantly lower CO2 emissions and reduce the demand for natural resources.
The utilisation of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as fly ash, helps in reducing clinker consumption, which is a major source of carbon emissions in cement production. This not only decreases our reliance on energy-intensive processes but also promotes waste recycling and resource efficiency. AFR adoption is an integral part of our commitment to the circular economy, ensuring that we minimise waste and optimise the use of materials throughout the production cycle, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable and eco-friendly cement industry.
WCL is exploring transitioning from fossil fuels to cleaner alternatives like biofuels or hydrogen or RDF/plastic waste/other hazardous waste. Till date, 5 per cent TSR has been achieved, while the intent is to achieve more than 20 per cent TSR. WCL is utilising the hazardous and other waste as an alternative fuel or raw material. We have used more than 3 lakh metric tonne of hydrogen waste and other waste in FY-2023-24.
How does your company approach waste management and recycling to minimise environmental harm?
WCL is focusing on the 3 R’s – Reduce, Reuse and Recycle. We focus on optimum utilisation of natural resources and reuse of said resource as well as recycling of the waste material generated from our operations.
We are contributing to reduce the legacy waste generated in our municipalities and we have co-processed more than 50000 tonnes of RDF/plastic waste. Additionally, we are sending other waste generated at our facilities such as used oil / used lead acid batteries / e-waste to authorised recyclers. We are focused on targeted reduction in waste generation.
We are also utilising alternative raw materials. which are the waste from other industries such as red mud, chemical gypsum, iron sludge and ETP sludge to substitute natural resources.
WCL is also increasing the use of recycled content of plastic in PP bags.
We have met our EPR target for plastic waste introduced in the market for FY 23-24 through co-processing of plastic waste in its kiln. Additional EPR credit will be traded for this in the market.
What are the biggest challenges your company faces in achieving compliance with environmental regulations, both locally and globally?
WCL is committed toward 100 per cent compliances to applicable rules and regulations and having dedicated resources to do so, when we talk about the challenges WCL faces in complying with environmental regulations is the constantly evolving nature of both local and global environmental rules and regulation which further leads to strength. While we are committed to adhering to stringent regulations, keeping up with the rapid changes in environmental laws requires continuous upgradation in technology and processes. Another challenge is the high capital investment needed for adopting cleaner technologies, such as De_Sox System / SNCR / Up-gradation of ESP /bag house and carbon capture systems.
Additionally, the availability of AFR can be inconsistent, making it difficult to achieve consistent reductions in GHG emissions. Despite these challenges, WCL remains committed to sustainability and continuously collaborates with regulatory bodies and industry experts to stay ahead of compliance requirements. We also invest in research and development to innovate our production processes, ensuring that we not only meet but exceed environmental compliances.
What technological innovations or process optimisations has your company adopted to lower greenhouse gas emissions?
WCL has adopted several technological innovations and process optimisations to lower greenhouse gas emissions. One of the key initiatives is the installation of 45 MW waste heat recovery systems, which capture excess heat from the production process and convert it into energy, reducing the overall carbon footprint. We have also introduced advanced burner technology with lower NOx emissions and optimised energy consumption and presently we are less than 47 KWh/tonne of clinker, which is one of the best in the cement industry.
The deployment of energy-efficient vertical roller mills (VRM) for clinker grinding also contributes to reducing energy consumption and emissions. These innovations are part of our broader commitment to sustainability and are continuously enhanced to meet global environmental standards.
WCL is focusing on investing in renewable energy sources like solar or wind power to meet the electricity needs. We have installed a solar power plant at our Nimbahera plant and Jhajjar grinding unit as well as 15 MW windmills at Pratapgarh, for our grinding units located at Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh and Dhule Maharashtra. We have renewable power purchase agreements to source renewable energy, which will replace approximately 50 to 60 per cent of energy demand from the grid, further leading to reducing the GHG emissions.
WCL is taking various operational/capex measures to reduce the energy requirement like installation of VFD, optimisation of differential pressures across bag filters and optimisation of kiln operation to get maximum output.
How does your company engage with stakeholders, including local communities and environmental agencies, to ensure transparency and sustainability in your operations?
WCL has a well-defined approach for identification of stakeholders, which is done after considering the material influence each group has on the company’s ability to create value (and vice-versa). The objective of stakeholder engagement is to foster connections, build trust and confidence and buy-in for your company’s key initiatives. This can also help us mitigate potential risks and conflicts with stakeholders.
Stakeholder engagement is done is to understand the needs and expectation of anyone who has a stake in our company, based on which we can develop our strategy and identify our focus areas such as:
What long-term goals has the company set in terms of reducing emissions
What steps are being taken to achieve them
What are the key focus areas to take society along with us
WCL places great emphasis on engaging with stakeholders, including local communities, environmental agencies and industry experts, to ensure transparency and sustainability. We conduct regular environmental audits and share our findings with relevant regulatory bodies to ensure compliance. Our CSR initiatives are closely aligned with community needs, particularly in areas like water conservation, afforestation and waste management, health, education and women empowerment, which directly impact the local environment.
We maintain an open dialogue with local residents to address their concerns about air quality, emissions and resource use and carry out need based assessment and accordingly design our CER/CSR programme and further implement the same.
Additionally, WCL participates in various industry forums and collaborates with environmental agencies to stay ahead of regulatory changes and adopt best practices. Transparency is key to building trust, and we ensure that all stakeholders are kept informed about our sustainability initiatives through periodic reports and community outreach programs. This collaborative approach ensures that we maintain a positive environmental and social impact.
What long-term goals has your company set in terms of reducing emissions, and what steps are being taken to achieve them?
WCL has set ambitious long-term goals to significantly reduce emissions in line with global climate targets. One of our primary objectives is to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2060, with interim goals to reduce CO2 intensity by 25 per cent by 2040 through increasing Green Energy Portfolio from present 41 per cent to 70 per cent, AFR and green hydrogen 3 per cent to 40 per cent, reduction in clinker factor from 79 to 60 per cent and CCUS and electrification of the kiln, introduction of LC3 and PLC cements based on techno-economic feasibility.
To achieve these targets, we are investing to develop facilities to feed more AFR, which helps to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and natural resources and lower carbon emissions. We are also exploring carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies to capture CO2 emissions at their source. WE are committed to achieving its long-term sustainability goals and contributing to the global effort to combat climate change.
Two cement concrete pavement roads covering a total stretch of 2.2 km in Akhoya village were inaugurated on 27th June 2026 by MLA Nuklutoshi Longkumer, who attended as the special guest. The project comprises the one km L Pangersowa Road and the one point two km Longchara Junction to RC Chiten Jamir Memorial Government High School road. A formal programme followed the inauguration at the school auditorium.
A technical report was presented by Er Waloniba of the Urban Engineering Wing-III, Kohima, which stated the project was sanctioned in March 2026 under the Special Assistance to States for Capital Investment scheme for 2025-26 at a sanctioned cost of Rs 29.1 million (mn). The work order was issued to M/s Ensign Construction on thirtieth April 2026 with a stipulated completion period of 12 months. Work commenced on fourth May 2026 and was completed on sixth June 2026, with the contractor and team finishing the tasks in around two months. The project included a single-lane cement concrete pavement with side drains, two slab culverts and breast walls at required locations.
Longkumer acknowledged the Chief Minister, the advisor for urban development, contractors and other stakeholders for the allocation and support, and he commended the contractor for early completion. He noted that cooperation from landowners and the community had been important in resolving land related issues that can otherwise delay developmental works. He emphasised that planned developmental activities carried out with collective effort would enable more projects to be implemented successfully.
The headmaster of RC Chiten Jamir Memorial Government High School, I Chubasenba Longkumer, outlined the school background, noting it was established in 1962, was earlier known as Government High School Changtongya and was renamed in 2014. Local representatives said the improved approach roads would ease access for students, staff, patients and the general public and fulfil a long standing aspiration of residents. A dedicatory prayer was offered by the pastor and the programme concluded with a ribbon cutting attended by village council and town council representatives.
Indian Cement Review (ICR) and Fuller Technologies brought industry, policy and technology leaders together to discuss how cement innovation can drive green construction at scale, writes Rakesh Rao.
India is building at a pace few countries can match. Highways, airports, housing, logistics parks, industrial corridors and urban infrastructure are reshaping the country’s economic geography. But beneath this growth story lies a difficult question: can India continue to build at scale without locking itself into a high-carbon future?
That question formed the core of an online panel discussion titled “Driving Green Construction Through Cement Innovation”, organised by Indian Cement Review (ICR) in association with Fuller Technologies as the Presenting Partner on June 25, 2026. The webinar brought together experts from cement technology, R&D, global industry platforms, building performance policy and international development cooperation to examine how low-carbon cement and material innovation can accelerate India’s green construction transition.
The discussion came at a crucial time. India has committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2070 and reducing the carbon intensity of its economy by 45 per cent by 2030. At the same time, the country’s construction sector is expanding rapidly, driven by urbanisation, infrastructure development, housing demand and industrial growth. Cement, as one of the most widely used construction materials, sits at the heart of this transition. It is indispensable to development, but also central to the challenge of reducing embodied carbon in buildings and infrastructure.
Moderated by Nitika Krishan, Senior Urban Infrastructure and Sustainable Policy Consultant, the panel featured:
Dr Hemantkumar Aiyer, VP and Head R&D, Nuvoco Vistas Corp Ltd;
Devika Wattal, Innovation Lead, Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA);
Dr Sunita Purushottam, MD, GBPN India (Global Buildings Performance Network); and
Vaibhav Rathi, Senior Technical Advisor, GIZ (the German Agency for International Cooperation)
Setting the tone for the discussion, Nitika Krishan underlined the scale of the challenge before the sector. “The question before us is no longer whether we build, but how we build sustainably,” she said. She pointed out that construction accounts for nearly 40 per cent of global energy-related carbon emissions when both operational and embodied carbon are considered. Cement production, she added, remains one of the hardest industrial processes to decarbonise.
For India, this is not merely an environmental issue. It is a development issue, a competitiveness issue and increasingly, a market issue. As one of the world’s largest cement producers and among the fastest-growing construction markets, India’s material choices will influence the carbon trajectory of its built environment for decades. As Krishan observed, sustainability solutions in economies such as India must not remain limited to laboratory success. They must be scalable, commercially viable and practical at national level.
The innovation gap: From technology to market
Experts believe that there is a need to bridge the innovation gaps for making decarbonisation in cement and concrete scalable. Devika Wattal of GCCA, explained, “The starting point must be the core cement manufacturing process itself. The first and foremost is the heart of our process, the heart of cement manufacturing. How do we reduce clinker? That is always a topic where industry is working very intrinsically.”
Clinker reduction remains one of the most important pathways for lowering emissions in cement. Since clinker production is energy-intensive and chemically emits carbon dioxide, reducing the clinker factor through supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), blended cements and new chemistries can have a significant impact. Wattal also noted that carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) will have a role, though it may not be the first lever for all markets.
However, she stressed that innovation cannot stop at technology development. A solution that works in the lab must also be adaptable to industry, scalable in production and acceptable in construction practice. “It is important for that innovation to be adaptable, to be scalable, and so that it can be executed in real time,” she said.
Wattal also called for stronger enabling systems around innovation. These include performance-based standards, product-level embodied carbon databases and clearer frameworks for evaluating green materials. Without these, low-carbon cement products may struggle to compete with conventional materials in procurement and design.
R&D must balance carbon, cost and performance
Bringing in the R&D perspective into the discussion, Dr Hemantkumar Aiyer of Nuvoco Vistas emphasised that low-carbon cement development cannot be treated as a single-variable exercise. Cement must perform in real construction conditions. It must deliver strength, durability, consistency and cost competitiveness, while also reducing carbon.
“The root of understanding and balancing all these aspects lies in materials, and knowing the materials,” he said.
According to Dr Aiyer, R&D teams must understand the variability of raw materials such as fly ash, slag and clinker. Different sources produce different material behaviours. This makes mix optimisation, material characterisation and processing-property relationships critical. When performance is affected, cement manufacturers must understand how strength enhancers, admixtures and other performance chemicals interact with the material system.
He also linked material science with process efficiency. Clinkerisation takes place at extremely high temperatures, around 1,400 to 1,450 degrees Celsius. Any improvement in raw mix design, process control or energy optimisation can, therefore, help reduce emissions and cost. Dr Aiyer pointed to artificial intelligence-based optimisation, Cement 4.0 tools and advanced software as important enablers for real-time process and material control.
“The more you understand the materials, the more you can control it,” he said.
LC3: The promise is proven, the sequencing is not
Limestone calcined clay cement, commonly referred to as LC3, has attracted global attention because it can reduce clinker content significantly by using calcined clay and limestone while maintaining performance in many applications. Kiranmai Sanagavarapu of Fuller Technologies said the technology itself has already moved beyond proof of concept. Fuller Technologies has worked with calcined clay technology for nearly two decades and has seen plants running in France and Ghana. These plants, she said, are meeting local and national specifications, while the economics are beginning to make sense.
“The calciner is performing, the economics is stacking up, it is making business sense to produce,” she said.
But if the technology is viable, why has adoption not scaled faster? For Sanagavarapu, the answer lies in project sequencing. Too often, clay characterisation happens after equipment is specified. This, she warned, is a backward approach because calciner design depends on clay mineralogy, kaolinite content, iron levels, reactivity, moisture and other variables.
“If you don’t know what your deposit looks like before you commit for the equipment, you are, in a way, going blind into designing,” she said.
She also identified permitting and plant integration as major bottlenecks. Environmental clearances, mining permissions and local regulatory approvals must begin early. Similarly, calcined clay must be integrated into existing grinding, blending and logistics systems from the design stage, not treated as an afterthought during commissioning.
India already has IS 18189:2023 standard for LC3, but Sanagavarapu pointed out that the standard is not yet visible enough in procurement documents. “The gap between what is technically being permitted and what the procurement is asking is the single biggest bottleneck,” she said.
In her view, successful scale-up depends on getting the sequence right: clay characterisation first, permitting in parallel, standards aligned with construction, and integration built into plant design.
India’s LC3 journey: Progress, but demand remains thin
Providing details of India’s LC3 commercialisation experience, Vaibhav Rathi of GIZ noted that JK Cement carried out the first commercial production of LC3 at its Rajasthan plant, followed by JK Lakshmi Cement three months later. These initiatives were supported by the International Climate Initiative of the Government of Germany, with IIT Delhi contributing deep institutional knowledge on LC3 research and BIS certification.
Rathi said India’s early experience has produced clear lessons. One of the biggest was the need to build capacity among regulators. While BIS certification existed, State Pollution Control Boards were unfamiliar with the technology and unsure about the approval pathway.
“The capacity building is not just needed amongst the producer and the users of the cement, but also the regulators who are working with this technology for the first time,” he said.
He also highlighted the need for better information on China clay deposits. Since China clay is currently classified as a minor mineral, centralised data on availability, quality and location is limited. If cement manufacturers are to adopt LC3 at scale, stronger mineral intelligence will be important.
The third issue is demand. LC3 has already been used in projects such as Palava City in Mumbai and Noida International Airport, but these remain limited examples. “It is in a chicken and egg situation,” Rathi said. “Cement companies are saying we need more demand, and users are saying there is not enough cement available.”
Public procurement, he suggested, could help break this cycle. If agencies such as CPWD and other public bodies begin testing, accepting and specifying LC3, it could create the market confidence needed for cement companies to invest in production and storage.
Building codes must catch up with innovation
Dr Sunita Purushottam of GBPN India argued that material choices will determine built environment emissions over the long term, but India’s current policy signals remain fragmented. Although LC3 has received BIS recognition, she pointed out that building codes, municipal bylaws, schedules of rates and sustainability codes do not yet provide uniform guidance on low-carbon cement.
“The current cement regulations are largely prescriptive and favouring traditional materials,” she said. This limits the ability of alternative materials to compete on performance, durability and emissions.
Dr Purushottam also raised the issue of taxation. Cement, including LC3, currently falls under the same GST bracket as conventional cement. A differentiated tax structure, she argued, could help accelerate market adoption. “In order for the market to demand LC3, that differentiation in the GST could go a long way,” she said.
She noted that green building certifications such as IGBC and GRIHA are already creating demand for low-carbon materials by assigning points for embodied carbon and sustainable material use. However, she said large-scale adoption will require regulatory mandates, particularly through building codes and state-level notifications.
She also cautioned that low-carbon cement alone does not solve the entire building performance problem. A material may reduce embodied carbon, but the operational carbon of a building depends on thermal performance, design, insulation and energy use. “The energy part has two elements,” she said. “One is the embodied carbon of the material itself, and the other is the operational carbon.”
Collaboration is the bridge between invention and impact
Wattal said GCCA sees innovation as a strategic priority and works through platforms that connect industry with academia and start-ups. “There is no way we will decarbonise our sector without innovation,” she said.
However, she stressed that research must be connected to actual industry challenges. Innovations developed in isolation may fail when they encounter real-world barriers such as raw material variability, plant integration, cost, standards and finance. Start-ups, too, need industry mentorship and scale-up pathways.
Wattal also flagged the importance of finance. Even strong technologies may struggle to attract investment if there is no common understanding of bankability. “We have always put projects into, is this a bankable project? But the definition of a bankable project has never been defined,” she said.
For India, she saw strong potential in its academic and start-up ecosystem, but said the challenge lies in alignment and prioritisation. The country has the research base, industrial capacity and market size. What it now needs is a coordinated route from innovation to deployment.
There is a practical concern for cement manufacturers: how can existing plants be adapted for lower emissions without compromising reliability or commercial viability?
Kiranmai Sanagavarapu addressed, “The reliability risk in calcined clay retrofit is definitely real, but it is almost always self-inflicted. The risk arises when a new process is added to an existing circuit without properly redesigning grinding and blending configurations.”
Existing cement plants, she explained, can take two broad routes. The first is external sourcing of calcined clay combined with mill optimisation. This requires lower capital investment and can potentially move in 12 to 18 months if other conditions are in place. It may reduce emissions by around 20 to 30 per cent. The second route is integrated calcination on site, which requires higher capital expenditure and longer lead times, but provides greater control over quality, supply and emissions reduction potential.
For Sanagavarapu, the principle is simple: low-carbon retrofits must be designed with intent. “Design it with an intent properly from the start. Start in the market conditions where the economics are already working,” she said.
Circularity: The overlooked advantage
According to Vaibhav Rathi, fly ash and slag are already well established in cement and construction (C&D), but construction and demolition waste remains underutilised. “C&D waste is a growing business opportunity which not many have taken up,” he said. India’s continuous construction and demolition activity creates huge volumes of waste, much of which contributes to air pollution, land degradation and material inefficiency. With the right processing and standards, this waste can be converted into useful construction products.
Rathi also pointed out that LC3 has a circular economy dimension that is often overlooked. It can use low-grade kaolin-rich clay left behind after high-grade clay is extracted for other applications. “LC3 is not only a low-carbon solution, but also a circular economy solution,” he said.
At the same time, he cautioned that LC3 in India is not yet cheap because it has not reached scale. Site-specific techno-commercial feasibility studies, supported jointly by development agencies and industry, could help companies assess whether LC3 production makes technical and financial sense at a given location.
Dr Purushottam added that India must address both low-carbon cement and construction waste together. “Both low-carbon cement and C&D waste go hand in hand. India does not have an option but to work on both,” she said.
Dr Aiyer called for policy shifts from both government and industry, including preferential purchasing of sustainable materials, minimum supplementary cementitious material requirements in public and public-private projects, and faster regulatory implementation. “If we can fast-track the regulatory standards and their implementation on the ground, that is the way to go,” he said.
From green ambition to green construction
Cement innovation is no longer only about chemistry. It is about systems. Low-carbon cement will scale only when technology, standards, procurement, finance, regulation, education and construction practice move together.
LC3 and other low-carbon technologies have shown promise. India has early commercial examples, strong research capability and growing market interest. But mainstream adoption will depend on whether demand can be created, regulators can be capacitated, standards can be embedded in procurement, and manufacturers can see a clear business case.
For a country building at India’s scale, the opportunity is enormous. Cement will continue to be central to infrastructure and urban development. The challenge now is to ensure that the cement used in India’s growth story carries a lower carbon burden.
Rakesh Rao
Participate in Cement Expo 2026 and discover how next-gen infrastructure can be built with innovations in cement.
JK Cement gained after being declared preferred bidder for the Gilund Limestone Block in Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, a lease area of 370.96 hectares. The firm saw its shares trade at Rs. 5550.05, up by 28.45 points or 0.52 per cent from the previous close of Rs. 5521.60 on the BSE. The scrip opened at Rs. 5569.15 and touched a high of Rs. 5625.00 and a low of Rs. 5531.00.
The stock recorded turnover of 1742 shares on the counter and the BSE group A stock with face value Rs. 10 has a 52 week high of Rs. 7565.00 on 20-Aug-2025 and a 52 week low of Rs. 4670.05 on 12-Jun-2026. Last one week high and low stood at Rs. 5625.00 and Rs. 5329.00 respectively. The promoters holding in the company stood at 45.66 per cent, while institutions and non-institutions held 40.61 per cent and 13.73 per cent respectively.
The e-auction conducted by the Government of Rajasthan resulted in the company being declared preferred bidder for the mining lease, and the allocation will enable the company to plan phased development of the deposit, subject to regulatory approvals. The Gilund block spans 370.96 hectares and its allocation is intended to support raw material security for the company’s cement operations in the region. The designation follows the government auction process and will allow the company to plan development and integration of the deposit into its supply chain.
The current market capitalisation stands at Rs. 430.38 billion (bn), reflecting market response to the mining news and prevailing valuation levels for the sector. Investors and analysts will watch for formal allotment and related disclosures that can clarify timelines, capital expenditure and expected production profiles. The report is intended for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice, and market participants are advised to consult advisers before making decisions.
