Connect with us

Concrete

For better safety parameters, a holistic approach is needed

Published

on

Shares

Anuj Kumar Mathur, Industry Expert and Consultant, and (retired) DGM – Safety, Health & Environment, Indian Oil Corporation, discusses the various mandatory measures to ensure safety within the manufacturing unit.

What are the key points of safety in a manufacturing plant?
Ensuring safety in a manufacturing plant is a systematic process that begins with the thorough identification of potential hazards. This involves regular assessments of the workplace, actively engaging employees in the recognition and reporting of potential risks. Subsequently, a comprehensive evaluation of associated risks is conducted, considering both severity and likelihood, utilising established risk assessment tools.
This is followed by prioritising the identified risks, involving categorisation based on severity and likelihood, with attention to legal and regulatory requirements. The development of a robust risk mitigation plan is then crucial, incorporating engineering controls, administrative measures and personal protective actions. Stakeholder collaboration, particularly with employees, is vital in both formulating and executing this plan.
Continuous monitoring is key to ensuring the ongoing effectiveness of the mitigation plan. Regular assessments of implemented controls, periodic risk reassessment and a commitment to continuous improvement based on feedback and emerging risks are integral components of this monitoring process. This systematic and proactive approach aims to establish a strong safety culture in the manufacturing plant, safeguarding employee well-being and contributing to the overall success of the operation.

Tell us about the safety gear that are essential while working with high heat, flammable substances, heights etc.?
When working in environments with high heat, flammable substances or heights, certain safety gear is essential to mitigate risks and ensure worker protection. For high heat environments, heat-resistant clothing such as fire-resistant coveralls, gloves and boots are crucial to protect against burns and heat-related injuries. Additionally, flame-resistant hoods and face shields provide further protection for the face and head.
When dealing with flammable substances, flame-resistant clothing made of materials like Nomex or Kevlar is indispensable to reduce the risk of ignition and burns. Safety goggles and chemical-resistant gloves are also essential to shield the eyes and hands from hazardous chemicals.
In situations involving heights, fall protection gear is paramount for worker safety. This includes harnesses, lanyards and anchor points to prevent falls and mitigate the impact in case of a fall. Safety helmets are vital for head protection from falling objects or impacts during work at heights.
Overall, the combination of heat-resistant clothing, flame-resistant gear, chemical-resistant gloves, safety goggles, fall protection equipment and safety helmets provides comprehensive protection for workers in environments with high heat, flammable substances and heights. Regular inspection, proper usage and adherence to safety protocols are equally important to ensure the effectiveness of the safety gear and safeguard workers’ well-being.

What are the major challenges in maintaining safety standards in any manufacturing unit?
Upholding safety standards in a manufacturing unit is a complex challenge, encompassing various facets. Human behaviour is a significant hurdle, where despite thorough safety training, factors like complacency or shortcuts can introduce risks. Shifting or reinforcing behaviours to prioritise safety demands continual focus on education, communication and cultivating a safety-conscious culture.
The monotony of work adds another layer to this challenge, as routine tasks may diminish vigilance towards safety protocols. Combating this involves introducing task variety, implementing job rotation and incorporating regular breaks to sustain employee engagement and attention to safety.
Moreover, the dynamic nature of manufacturing processes and the integration of new technologies present ongoing challenges in adapting and updating safety measures accordingly. Regular assessments are crucial to pinpoint potential hazards associated with evolving processes.
Effective communication emerges as a pivotal challenge, ensuring consistent understanding and transmission of safety information across all organisational levels. This spans communication on alterations in safety protocols, incident reporting procedures and the significance of adhering to safety guidelines.
In essence, maintaining safety standards in manufacturing demands a comprehensive strategy, addressing behavioural nuances, alleviating work monotony, adapting to technological shifts and establishing robust communication channels. Proactively confronting these challenges establishes a resilient safety culture, minimising the risk of accidents within the workplace.

As an auditor, what are your key checkpoints to declare a plant safe?
Firstly, I would meticulously review the Safety Policy to ensure its clarity, alignment with industry standards, and dissemination throughout the organisation. Regulatory compliances form a critical aspect, necessitating a thorough examination to confirm adherence to local, national, and international safety regulations.
I would assess safety indicators, such as incident rates and near-miss reporting, to gauge the effectiveness of the plant’s safety performance. The presence and functionality of safety interlocks in machinery and processes would be scrutinised to prevent accidents. Furthermore, the establishment of a robust preventive and predictive maintenance programme is crucial for identifying and addressing potential safety hazards before they escalate.
A key focus would be on evaluating the prevailing safety culture within the plant, emphasising the importance of employee engagement and commitment to safety. Additionally, the emergency plan, encompassing evacuation procedures, communication protocols and emergency response drills, would be thoroughly examined to ensure preparedness for unforeseen events. The culmination of these checkpoints would enable me to make an informed declaration regarding the safety status of the manufacturing plant during the audit.

What are the major challenges in maintaining plant safety?
One significant challenge is fostering a robust safety culture that ingrains safety as a core value among all employees. Overcoming behavioural aspects, such as complacency and the normalisation of risks, requires continuous efforts in education and communication. The monotony of daily tasks can contribute to lapses in attention, demanding innovative approaches to keep safety at the forefront. Adapting to technological advancements introduces challenges in updating safety protocols to align with evolving processes. Ensuring compliance with stringent regulatory standards is an ongoing challenge, requiring vigilant monitoring and adjustments to meet changing requirements. Effective communication channels must be established to consistently convey safety information across diverse organisational levels.
The dynamic nature of manufacturing processes necessitates continuous risk assessments and proactive mitigation strategies. Addressing these challenges requires a holistic approach, integrating behavioural interventions, technological adaptations and a commitment to regulatory compliance, thereby creating a workplace where safety is not just a protocol but a shared responsibility ingrained in the fabric of the organisation.

What suggestions would you give cement plants to improve safety parameters?
For better safety parameters, a holistic approach is needed. Firstly, establishing comprehensive training programmes is crucial, ensuring that maintenance personnel are well-versed in the specific safety challenges inherent to cement plant operations. Regular safety audits should be conducted to identify and mitigate potential hazards, emphasising compliance with safety standards. Adequate provision and consistent use of personal protective equipment (PPE) must be prioritised, encompassing gear such as hard hats, gloves, eye protection and respiratory equipment.
Rigorous adherence to machine guarding and lockout/tagout procedures is imperative to prevent accidents during maintenance activities. Fall protection measures, especially for tasks performed at heights, need to be implemented. Proper chemical handling protocols, preventive maintenance programmes, and well-rehearsed emergency response plans contribute to a comprehensive safety framework. Employee involvement should be encouraged, fostering a culture of shared responsibility. Continuous training and effective communication channels ensure that safety practices remain current. Finally, the implementation of behaviour-based safety programmes enhances overall safety consciousness. By integrating these suggestions, cement plants can proactively mitigate risks, creating a safer working environment for their maintenance personnel.

  • Kanika Mathur

Concrete

UltraTech Cement FY26 PAT Crosses Rs 80 bn

Company reports record sales, profit and 200 MTPA capacity milestone

Published

on

By

Shares



UltraTech Cement reported record financial performance for Q4 and FY26, supported by strong volumes, higher profitability and improved cost efficiency. Consolidated net sales for Q4 FY26 rose 12 per cent year-on-year to Rs 254.67 billion, while PBIDT increased 20 per cent to Rs 56.88 billion. PAT, excluding exceptional items, grew 21 per cent to Rs 30.11 billion.

For FY26, consolidated net sales stood at Rs 873.84 billion, up 17 per cent from Rs 749.36 billion in FY25. PBIDT rose 32 per cent to Rs 175.98 billion, while PAT increased 36 per cent to Rs 83.05 billion, crossing the Rs 80 billion mark for the first time.

India grey cement volumes reached 42.41 million tonnes in Q4 FY26, up 9.3 per cent year-on-year, with capacity utilisation at 89 per cent. Full-year India grey cement volumes stood at 145 million tonnes. Energy costs declined 3 per cent, aided by a higher green power mix of 43 per cent in Q4.

The company’s domestic grey cement capacity has crossed 200 MTPA, reaching 200.1 MTPA, while global capacity stands at 205.5 MTPA. UltraTech also recommended a special dividend of Rs 2.40 billion per share value basis equivalent to Rs 240.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Towards Mega Batching

Optimised batching can drive overall efficiencies in large projects.

Published

on

By

Shares



India’s pace of infrastructure development is pushing the construction sector to work at a significantly higher scale than previously. Tight deadlines necessitate eliminating concreting delays, especially in large and mega projects, which, in turn, imply installing the right batching plant and ensuring batching is efficient. CW explores these steps as well as the gaps in India’s batching plant market.

Choose well

Large-scale infrastructure and building projects typically involve concrete consumption exceeding 30,000-50,000 cum per annum or demand continuous, high-volume pours within compressed timelines, according to Rahul R Wadhai, DGM – Quality, Tata Projects.

Considering the daily need for concrete, “large-scale concreting involves pouring more than 1,000–2,000 cum per day while mega projects involve more than 3,000 cum per day,” says Satish R Vachhani, Advanced Concrete & Construction Consultant…

To read the full article Click Here

Continue Reading

Concrete

Andhra Offers Discom Licences To Private Firms Outside Power Sector

Policy allows firms over 300 MW to seek distribution licences

Published

on

By

Shares



The Andhra Pradesh government will allow private firms that require more than 300 megawatt (MW) of power to apply for distribution licences, making the state the first to extend such licences beyond the power sector. The policy targets information technology, pharmaceuticals, steel and data centres and aims to reduce reliance on state utilities as demand rises for artificial intelligence infrastructure.

Approved applicants will be able to procure electricity directly from generators through power purchase agreements, a change officials said will create more competitive tariffs and reduce supply risk. Licence holders will use the Andhra Pradesh Transmission Company (APTRANSCO) network on payment of charges and will not need a separate distribution network initially.

Licences will be granted under the Electricity Act, 2003 framework, with the Central and State electricity regulators retaining authority over terms and approvals. The recent Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2025 sought to lower entry barriers, enable network sharing and encourage competition, while the state commission will set floor and ceiling tariffs where multiple discoms operate.

Industry players and original equipment manufacturers welcomed the policy, saying competitive supply is vital for large data centre investments. Major projects and partnerships such as those involving Adani and Google, Brookfield and Reliance, and Meta and Sify Technologies are expected to benefit as capacity expands in the state.

Analysts noted India’s data centre capacity is forecast to reach 10 gigawatts (GW) by 2030 and cited International Energy Agency estimates that global data centre electricity consumption could approach 945 terawatt hours by the same year. A one GW data centre needs an equivalent power allocation and one point five times the water, which authorities equated to 150 billion litres (150 bn litres).

Advisers warned that distribution licences will require close regulation and monitoring to prevent misuse and to ensure tariffs and supply obligations are met. Officials said the policy aims to balance investor requirements with regulatory oversight and could serve as a model for other states.

Continue Reading

Video Thumbnail

    SIGN-UP FOR OUR GENERAL NEWSLETTER


    Trending News

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

     

    Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

     


      This will close in 0 seconds