The cost curve in the Indian cement industry has been on an upward trajectory. ICR delves into the causes behind it and its impact while endeavouring to answer the important question – how much of this is permanent?
If the financial year 2022 was the year of shipping costs soaring to the highest level, the financial year 2023 started with the coal and pet coke prices moving to the stratosphere in tandem, largely buoyed by the geo-political headwinds with the war in Ukraine, forcing a sanction of a large part of the oil, gas and coal from the Russian sources to the Western world. The fallout of this was a steep hardening of the coal futures, both New Castle and API4 Indexes shot up to the extreme levels it has never seen in the past. While these were FOB prices, the shipping freight, albeit softening from the stratospheric levels, were still high by any standard. The Indian cement industry was hugely impacted by the rise in power and fuel prices as this contributes to 30 per cent of the industry cost of producing and distributing cement, the logistics cost still remaining high at 40 per cent of the total costs. The first quarter of FY2023 saw an across the industry rise of above 60 per cent in the power and fuel cost as attached in the graph below (compiled from the quarterly reports of the key industry players).
Market Dynamics This rise has however cooled down in the recent quarter, but a large part of the rise seems to be permanent and the total shift in the industry cost curve is expected to be 20 per cent higher on power and fuel cost together with the impact of logistics cost. How do we explain this structural shift in cost? While most of the analysis is based on the spot prices of coal, both in the international and domestic market, which in turn influences the prices of pet coke as well, the private buyers of coal and pet coke do not trade on spot basis for the bulk of their portfolio, which is built on an optimised model for buying a mix of domestic coal (linkage auction, e-auction and market coal), imported coal (RB1,2,3, Indonesian, other sources, etc), domestic pet coke (Nyara, Reliance, IOCL, etc), imported pet coke (U.S. East Coast, Oman, LATAM, etc), such that the landed cost could be minimised on the basis of rupee per kcal (heat value) as the portfolio must be normalised over the range of GCV options. Private sellers and buyers have experienced in their own way through tenured contracts that inter-dependence in a highly volatile market did demonstrate better results over the long run, but in the short term both sides have engaged in short term opportunism. This has put additional strains in the system and these postures have influenced the spot prices. While the FOB prices started to show distinct ‘out of bound’ movement, the shipping costs remained high throughout this period and only recently have shown a definitive downward trend. The individual cement players within the industry have very different portfolio of their own, built through the years on an optimisation programme that takes into account the kiln characteristics as well, in accepting a mix of coal or/and pet coke from a myriad of sources, where logistics cost becomes a very dominant factor; with shipping costs soaring, the negative results have been more pronounced for those who have an over-exposure to importation. One of the important points to be noted is that the Indian coal prices have also gone up by 75 per cent on an average across a range of grades, those who have long term auction linkages still alive, are the outliers benefitting the most. The future direction of the domestic coal prices does not seem to portray a large change as most of the mines have a rising cost to contend with, as stripping ratios continue to rise every year, followed by logistics cost.
Taking on Challenges The question of power and fuel cost rise should be seen in the long term rather than in the short term, although finding the most optimised mix in terms of cost has remained the area of focus all along. Two of the biggest challenges that urgently require solutions from the industry are as follows:
Cement industry cannot continue to increase the use of fossil fuel in the mix of inputs: Apart from the emission issue that weighs on the situation (potential abatement costs included), the economics of higher fuel usage weighs far more menacingly on the cost curve. As every linkage auction quantity allocated to the cement industry has been steadily going down, it is expected that the prices will be moving up. The overall allocation still remains highly skewed to the power sector (where cement CPPs also become strong contenders), the overall situation after factoring in logistics issues still show that the domestic coal cost per MW of output has been rising steadily.
Captive coal mines have remained a challenge in terms of overall cost: The only solution for the long term is to look for captive coal mines that have logistics advantages and where the costs over the long term can be found as a viable option when compared with other sources of coal or pet coke. But the actual progress on the ground is low due to the challenges of stripping ratios for the mines that are on offer.
Pet coke prices have reasons for moving up: The US refineries have stopped all further investments and the portfolio is also getting transformed as far as their waste outputs are concerned. In the hierarchy of waste outputs, the total cost including the future abatement costs are increasingly being considered. In this regard, pet coke costs are likely to almost double if these considerations are factored in. The structural shift of power and fuel price hypothesis can be tested in the next two quarters when the India cement industry would showcase their alternate hypothesis (use of Russian coal, Venezuelan pet coke). But the rise would still be significant over the long-term power and fuel prices that the industry witnessed, which used to hover around Rs 1000/T. Today, this is around Rs 1700/T for the industry, a shift which has happened in just two years’ time. The question then shifts to whether the industry could create a structural pass-through of these costs in prices. With the current trajectory of prices, it does not seem to be happening. However, the industry is moving through a spate of consolidations and the recent entry of Adani could change the picture further. Its strong network advantages stemming from logistics consolidation across the entire geography of India could be a strong contender to challenge the current hypothesis.
UltraTech Cement reported record financial performance for Q4 and FY26, supported by strong volumes, higher profitability and improved cost efficiency. Consolidated net sales for Q4 FY26 rose 12 per cent year-on-year to Rs 254.67 billion, while PBIDT increased 20 per cent to Rs 56.88 billion. PAT, excluding exceptional items, grew 21 per cent to Rs 30.11 billion.
For FY26, consolidated net sales stood at Rs 873.84 billion, up 17 per cent from Rs 749.36 billion in FY25. PBIDT rose 32 per cent to Rs 175.98 billion, while PAT increased 36 per cent to Rs 83.05 billion, crossing the Rs 80 billion mark for the first time.
India grey cement volumes reached 42.41 million tonnes in Q4 FY26, up 9.3 per cent year-on-year, with capacity utilisation at 89 per cent. Full-year India grey cement volumes stood at 145 million tonnes. Energy costs declined 3 per cent, aided by a higher green power mix of 43 per cent in Q4.
The company’s domestic grey cement capacity has crossed 200 MTPA, reaching 200.1 MTPA, while global capacity stands at 205.5 MTPA. UltraTech also recommended a special dividend of Rs 2.40 billion per share value basis equivalent to Rs 240.
India’s pace of infrastructure development is pushing the construction sector to work at a significantly higher scale than previously. Tight deadlines necessitate eliminating concreting delays, especially in large and mega projects, which, in turn, imply installing the right batching plant and ensuring batching is efficient. CW explores these steps as well as the gaps in India’s batching plant market.
Choose well
Large-scale infrastructure and building projects typically involve concrete consumption exceeding 30,000-50,000 cum per annum or demand continuous, high-volume pours within compressed timelines, according to Rahul R Wadhai, DGM – Quality, Tata Projects.
Considering the daily need for concrete, “large-scale concreting involves pouring more than 1,000–2,000 cum per day while mega projects involve more than 3,000 cum per day,” says Satish R Vachhani, Advanced Concrete & Construction Consultant…
The Andhra Pradesh government will allow private firms that require more than 300 megawatt (MW) of power to apply for distribution licences, making the state the first to extend such licences beyond the power sector. The policy targets information technology, pharmaceuticals, steel and data centres and aims to reduce reliance on state utilities as demand rises for artificial intelligence infrastructure.
Approved applicants will be able to procure electricity directly from generators through power purchase agreements, a change officials said will create more competitive tariffs and reduce supply risk. Licence holders will use the Andhra Pradesh Transmission Company (APTRANSCO) network on payment of charges and will not need a separate distribution network initially.
Licences will be granted under the Electricity Act, 2003 framework, with the Central and State electricity regulators retaining authority over terms and approvals. The recent Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2025 sought to lower entry barriers, enable network sharing and encourage competition, while the state commission will set floor and ceiling tariffs where multiple discoms operate.
Industry players and original equipment manufacturers welcomed the policy, saying competitive supply is vital for large data centre investments. Major projects and partnerships such as those involving Adani and Google, Brookfield and Reliance, and Meta and Sify Technologies are expected to benefit as capacity expands in the state.
Analysts noted India’s data centre capacity is forecast to reach 10 gigawatts (GW) by 2030 and cited International Energy Agency estimates that global data centre electricity consumption could approach 945 terawatt hours by the same year. A one GW data centre needs an equivalent power allocation and one point five times the water, which authorities equated to 150 billion litres (150 bn litres).
Advisers warned that distribution licences will require close regulation and monitoring to prevent misuse and to ensure tariffs and supply obligations are met. Officials said the policy aims to balance investor requirements with regulatory oversight and could serve as a model for other states.