Concrete
The mark of a good refractory is its ability to remain inert
Published
4 years agoon
By
admin
Prabhat Singh Parihar, Vice President (Technical Head), Mangrol Plant, JK Cement, talks about the challenges faced by cement plants in maintaining refractories and the important properties of refractories that ensure smooth functioning of the processes.
Explain the types of refractories you have in your manufacturing unit. What are their respective purposes?
At JK Cement’s MGR plant, the following types of refractories are used:
- Acid Refractories: Any type of alumina silicate refractories (like fire bricks, alumina brick, high alumina bricks) and silica refractories are called acid refractories. Our manufacturing facilities use alumina bricks in all our kilns, PH, and coolers.
- Kiln Refractory: In the kiln we use DALSINT A (70 per cent alumina and 2 per cent Fe), DALSINT B (70 per cent alumina and 2.5 per cent Fe) and alumina 40 per cent bricks in the respective kiln zones.
- Purpose: Alumina bricks are especially used because these bricks resist acidic flux. Alumina bricks have good thermal stability, high refractoriness that is more than 1770oC and lower thermal conductivity resulting in less heat loss. Alumina bricks are also cost effective when compared to basic bricks.
- Castable: Various grades of castable are used for better service life of the kiln inlet and outlet sectors, burner pipe and coolers. As sintered clinker is very abrasive in nature, Castables such as SiC base, mullite base and CRC- BP for burner pipe are preferred. Castables are best suited for surfaces where brick lining installation is not-possible or is not suitable, as it is easy to mould and there is no chance of falling out like bricks.
- Calcium Silicate Blocks: The challenge with pyro-section is its high operating temperature, resulting in high surface heat losses to ambient surroundings. To overcome this, calcium silicate blocks are installed throughout with refractory, with increment in thickness of insulation blocks. This results in a significant decrease in surface temperature and heat loss.
- Mortar: Alumina/Mullite based mortars are generally used for adhering bricks. As it also shrinks at high temperatures a limited quantity (1.5 to 2 mm) should be applied.
- Ceramic Blankets / Paper / Wool: Like all materials, refractory also expands when heated. Typically, a newly installed refractory would expand anywhere between 1.5 per cent to 2 per cent initially. To avoid adding extra mechanical stress to the refractory, a gap is provided along a certain length. This is generally packed with glass-wool as it gets compressed when the refractory expands. Glass can be easily fitted in any slot or gap as it can be compressed. The dimension for the brick lining is typically 600×600 mm for castable panels, with the axial height of 1000 mm.
What are the key materials used in building a refractory lining to the kiln in your organisation?
For kiln refractory lining, a major portion consists of refractory bricks, castable for kiln inlet and outlet sector, mortar, ceramic paper, shim plate and anchors.
- Refractory bricks: In a rotary kiln, the majority of the refractory type is brick refractory. Various grades of 40 per cent, 60 per cent and 70 per cent alumina bricks (DALSINT-A, B and C) are used. VDZ type bricks are generally used. Kiln lining is done by both layering and jack.
- Castable are used for kiln inlet and outlet sectors to improve better service life. Since, sintered clinker is cooled just after the liquid phase as the sintered phase reaches a high temperature (1450oC) and is very abrasive in nature. Castable that is SiC base and CRC- BP is usually preferred.
- Anchors: Temperature of both extremities are high, to hold castable, and provide structural strength to castable, SS-310 anchors are used. Anchors are welded and capped to prevent breakage from metallic expansion.
- Ceramic Blankets / Paper / Wool: To provide expansion provision for brick lining and castable panel for kiln sector (10 to 18 panel), ceramic paper of 3 mm applied.
- Mortar: Alumina/Mullite based mortars are generally used for adhering bricks. As it also shrinks at high temperature and can loosen the arch causing refractory failure, a minimum and only justified amount of mortar should be used in kiln lining.
What are the key properties of a refractory that support the cement making process?
Cement manufacturing is an energy intensive process. Burning alkaline raw materials (reactive) combined with smaller constituents of metals and abrasive raw materials at very high temperature is a major challenge. Therefore, a good refractory that can withstand high temperatures while retaining required strength and that is resistant to chemical properties of the alkaline raw materials is crucial. Besides, chemical attacks from sulphates or chlorine from the kiln feed or fuel or alternative fuels are other factors that need to be factored in.
Major refractory properties that contribute to cement manufacturing are:
Thermal properties
- Refractories are materials that can withstand very high temperatures and mechanical stresses of dead load. Key parameters for considering a good refractory are its service temperature which is the maximum temperature at which refractory can withstand stresses applied to it at a given temperature.
- Refractory Under Load (RUL) and Pyrometric Cone Equivalent (PCE) are defined as the most important properties of refractory, i.e., resisting or withstanding high temperature. Refractory under load can be defined as the temperature at which refractory can withstand without deformation. Pyrometric Cone Equivalent (PCU) is the temperature at which refractory starts to form an amorphous phase.
- Resistance to thermal shock or spalling: As refractory is heated or cooled it tends to expand or shrink respectively a sudden cooling or heating can cause refractory to lose its strength or can dislocate its position during the heating and cooling cycle resulting in refractory failure.
- Reducing heat losses: Refractories have a lower heat conductivity, thus, the heat transfer rate due to conduction is reduced.
Chemical properties
Refractory material is exposed to high temperature and reactive components of kiln feed, fuel, and alternative fuels. The major reactive components are the metal sulphates or chlorides that can penetrate through the pores of the refractory and get deposited at the core. The cold face of the refractory causes’ loss of strength of refractory material. The mark of a good refractory is its ability to remain inert.
Physical properties
Bulk density is an important property of refractories. A higher bulk density material means that it has a minimum porosity which minimises chemical attacks on the refractory.
Porosity can be defined as the percentage of open pore space in the overall volume of refractory. Pores on a refractory material, provides a site for absorption to the alkali sulphates or chlorides which get absorbed from the hot face side to under refractories and erodes and loses strength from the core of refractories. That is why a good refractory shall have a minimum apparent porosity of 0.2 per cent.
Cold crushing strength: As refractories must withstand a certain mechanical load. The load of itself and the mechanical stress generated due to expansion (radial and axial). A high cold crushing strength means that it would have less breakage while installing, with a good RUL and along comes the draw-back of brittleness
of refractory.
Thermal expansion or permanent linear change. Like all materials, refractory also expands at high temperatures. While a newly installed refractory expands to upto 2 per cent, the permanent expansion and thermal expansion shrinkage cycle deteriorates the strength and service life of the refractory.
Tell us more about the porosity and permeability of the refractory.
Porosity is the volumetric ratio occupied by pores present in refractory material. Porous material is not suitable for refractory application as it has low bulk density and low cold crushing strength.
Apparent Porosity: The ratio of the total volume of the open pores in a porous body to its bulk volume expressed as percentage, of the bulk volume is apparent porosity.
The significance of apparent porosity is as follows:
- Lower the better as it influences chemical resistance.
- Related to BD or compactness.
- Affects cold crushing strength.
- Higher the porosity, lower the thermal conductivity. This means lower heat loss because of more entrapped air inside the refractory structure. Hence, higher porosity refractory may be used to save heat loss in the area where there is lesser risk of abrasion and lower possibility of alkali penetration.
- Very low porosity affects thermal shock resistance.
- 15 per cent to 20 per cent common value for most refractories made by machine pressing.
- For hand moulded shapes 25 per cent to 35 per cent may be the range
- Higher the porosity, more will be the alkali penetration. Generally, alkali salts are solidified at a temperature range between 750 to 850oC directly from vapour. Hence, a more porous refractory can be easily used in the area where the application temperature is less than 750oC.
Closed Porosity: The ratio of the total volume of the closed pores in a porous body to its bulk volume expressed as a percentage of the bulk volume is closed porosity.
True Porosity: The sum of the apparent porosity and the closed porosity is true porosity.
Permeability: It is the measure of flow of gases through pores within the refractory body, and it indicates the extent of pore linkage. Permeability of refractories gives an indication on how well the refractory will stand up to molten slag, a melt or to a gas penetration.
Permeability of refractory is directly influenced by refractory material and apparent porosity of the refractory. As the apparent porosity of the refractory increases it provides a more active site for absorption of volatile sulphates or chlorides into the refractory.
Typical cases of permeability are:
- Alkali Salt Infiltration: As the pores on the refractory surface absorb the volatile metallic sulphates and chloride. They seep through refractory to core and cold face of refractory where they condense to solid form.
- Anchor Corrosion: The alkali salts that seep through the castable reacts with anchors causing corrosion, hence, castable loses its structural strength causing refractory failure.
What is the maximum temperature that a refractory can withhold? How does its strength differ from ambient temperature to high temperature?
There are four key parameters for defining the maximum temperature a refractory can
withhold are:
- Service Temperature: This is the temperature at which refractory can withstand without any failure or losing strength. With increase in active refractory ingredients, the refractory service temperature increases.
- Refractory Under Load (RUL): It is the minimum temperature at which a sample will deform by 0.6 per cent under a constant load. Cylindrical sample that is 50 mm in diameter and 50 mm in height is tested. Constant load of 2 kg/cm2 is maintained on the specimen. The rate of temperature rise is maintained at 15oC or a minimum up to 1000oC and 8oC/min beyond that. Temperature is measured either by thermocouple or optical pyrometer. The expansion or contraction while reading is measured by a dial gauge. As a thumb rule, RUL of brick should be at least 200oC more from its application temperature.
- Pyro metric Cone Equivalent (PCE): It is the temperature at which refractory material gets softened, or it indicates the range of melting point. Sample cones are made by using ~1 per cent alkali free dextrin. Standard cone (German Standard Seger cone or ASTM standard orton cone) along with sample cone are placed on a plaque at an angle of 82o inside. After that this plaque is placed inside the furnace where temperature rise is 35oC/min up to 1560oC and 2-3oC/min beyond that.
- Cold Crushing Strength (CCS): In this test, the cube of a specific dimension cut from the brick sample is subjected to increasing load, until it gets crushed and the test result is reported as the value load per unit area. It indicates the adequacy of firing temperature, for shaped Refractory products, required for proper sintering and to develop the required microstructure and the quality of hydraulic or chemical bond in case of unshaped refractories. In the unshaped products, the CCS does not remain the same after heat treatment, and it decreases or increases with the temperature of heat treatment. The good cold crushing strength of shaped refractories protects them from damages during handling and from mechanical abuses in service.
PCE > RUL > Service Temperature > Operating Temperature
As a thumb rule PCE temperature is about 15 to 20oC more than RUL, whereas RUL should be about 150 to 200oC more than service temperature.
Service temperature is decided in such a manner that at any given time it is always higher than operating temperature (operating temperature + temperature increase in case of process fluctuation).
Numerous inert or non-refractory materials can decrease the service temperature as they form a new eutectic point with an active refractory compound. It is a common practice to make small panels of refractory by installing extra retainers to hold the dead weight of refractories.
Tell us about the installation and operating process of refractories in the kiln.
The lining of refractory material in the rotary kiln is almost exclusively made up of refractory bricks. Refractory castables are used in part only in the kiln inlet and outlet. The bricks work creates an arch in the kiln that is self-supporting and which correctly fits with the kiln shell.
Due to lack of anchoring, the lining must be supported during installation. Two type of bricks installation in a kiln are:
Installation with rotation of kiln – Spindle Method: The spindle method or jacking method is a classic procedure for lining rotary kilns. The bricks are placed in the lower half of the kiln, then the wall segment is supported with spindles so that the kiln can be rotated. After a quarter turn the next segment is lined and so on. The spindle method is a cost-effective method and can achieve excellent results. However, the kiln must be rotated again and again because the individual sections cannot be more than five metre in length. Moreover, the spindle method is suitable only up to a kiln diameter of 4.4 metres.
Installation without rotation of the kiln – Brick Lining Machine: A method in which the rotary kiln must not be rotated while lining (and cannot be rotated) work based on the same principle i.e., first, the lower half of the kiln is provided with the refractory bricks, because no support is required in this area and then brick lining machine will be installed for the remaining upper half area and each ring is supported by a hydraulic jack of brick lining machine until its completion.
What are the standards set for refractories in a cement kiln?
For a kiln, the following types of refractories are used: Refractory Brick, Castable and SS Anchor.
The refractory bricks for the kiln brick lining, high alumina ISO bricks of 40 per cent, 60 per cent and 70 per cent alumina are used. Abrasive resistant castables have a high service temperature and are desired such as grade- LC-60, 90 SiC and CRC as the quenching/cooling zone of the kiln handles the hot and abrasive sintered clinker. SS310 anchors are preferred over SS304 only for kiln and burner pipe.
The main standards that a refractory supplier must meet are:
- Bulk Density: A very crude and crucial standard. A higher bulk density means the refractory bricks are cooked properly and have an active refractory ingredient present. Brick with low brick density indicates low active refractory ingredients.
- Alumina/Active Refractory Content: Alumina content of bricks should not be less than specified value as it is the active refractory ingredient.
- Iron/Ferrite: Iron content of refractory should be below 2.5 per cent as the increase in iron content decreases the PCE and RUL values.
- Apparent Porosity: The value of the refractory should be kept below 0.25 as it increases the alkali salt permeability, anchor corrosion, and decreases the core crushing strength of refractory.
- Cold Crushing Strength (CCS): This strength of the refractory is a must compliant property of a refractory to withhold any mechanical load that is applied to it. Typical CCS value for a fireclay with high alumina is 450kN/cm2 and 650 kN/cm2.
Refractory Under Load (RUL) for refractories it typically between 1400oC to 1500oC
Permanent Linear Change (PLC) is an expansion of a newly installed refractory. This generates an excessive mechanical load on refractory. PLC for refractory should be less than 1.5 per cent.
Pyrometric Cone Equivalent (PCE) for a refractory should be around 35 degree Orton.
Spalling Resistance are the numbers of heating and cooling cycles that a refractory can hold without any failure. Spalling resistance for refractory is desired to be above 30.
Geometry of the refractory is mostly important and no compromise can be made with it, albeit a tolerance of 1.5 to 2 mm can be considered. Same applies for the SS anchors.
What is the role of technology and automation in refractories for cement kilns?
Since the refractory work is very bulky and time consuming, lots of skilled man-hours are spent, which makes it one of the most cost and time intensive jobs. Shutdown even for a small duration of the plant is a major challenge. The introductions of new technology will help to ultimately overcome the refractory application cost and the installation time.
To overcome the above challenges, new processes/technology that are being implemented.
Brick Lining Machine: Before brick lining machine, the refractory applications required manpower for the transportation of refractory, installation of refractory and using jack for holding arch. All these procedures require a large manpower, both skilled and unskilled. In addition to that, it also takes a long time for installation.
The use of brick lining machines and portable belt conveyor, refractory materials are easily conveyed in a convenient way without any unnecessary stockpile lying around in the way of work. Since all brickwork can be done without rotation with the brick lining machine, the time lost in between tightening and loosening the jack and evacuating the manpower from the kiln while rotating is eliminated. A huge advantage is the completion of this process without the requirement of a huge manpower. A small team of skilled manpower can execute the work in a very precise manner and in a limited time.
Gunning/ShotCreting: For castable application in gunning, a batch of dry castable and binder or water are conveyed through a compressed air line to the mixing nozzle where they mix and get applied at application site. Conventional castable application requires a mandatory castable shuttering with material poured over and a vibrator needle, to set it in the right place. This makes it very time-consuming and chances of the castable not being placed properly is there which will take enormous time and manpower to rectify the application. For a shuttering that is not set properly it needs to be broken and new castable will be reapplied hence increasing cost of breaking and re-applying.
For a point place where huge quantum of castable must be applied, Gunning is preferred as it has its advantages such as:
- No need of carpenter or mason or helpers for shuttering frame, making and application of castable.
- Chances of castable not setting properly is eliminated.
- Refractory application rate can be achieved up to 5 TPH.
- Since, failure of setting occurs and application are lesser than conventional method, wastage of castable is minimum with rebound losses for gunning of are about 2 per cent.
- Precast Pre-Fired Refractory: A modern and modular way for refractory application is the Precast Pre-Fired Refractory, which are pre casted to defined required geometrical shapes and can be applied simply bolting, anchoring, and hanging to roof channel support. The key advantages of the new concept are less dependency on skilled manpower, availability of refractory is already casted and only need to be installed.
What tests are employed to check the refractory for defects and at what intervals are these tests done?
There is only a limited number of methods available for a condition diagnosis of the refractory material. In practice, the following are used:
- Measurement of shell temperatures.
- Visual inspection from inside and outside (example: inspection of expansion joints, friction comp.)
- Non-destructive measurement of residual
- brick thickness
- Drill holes and chiselling out of windows
- Quality measurement and surveying the kiln axis
Measurement of shell temperatures: The chronological development of the maximum, average and minimum temperatures on the shell of the rotary kiln allows for conclusion to be drawn for the ratio between lining and coating build-up. Based on the velocity of the temperature changes, further development can be estimated. For example, if maximum temperature rises sharply while the average temperature remains the same or changes slightly, then this pertains to a limited, localised eruption and not overheating of the relevant kiln zone. One preferable option would be to continually check the kiln shell temperature by measuring infrared radiation.
Visual inspection from outside: Inspection or detecting peculiarities on the entire kiln plant are part of the routine task of the kiln personnel. Sudden changes in the surface colours due to increased shell temperatures are clear signs of damage in the lining. But most of the time, even more serious damage is already present. The visual diagnostic procedure therefore ranks last among potential tools, and it is primarily used to prevent further damage to machines.
The condition of the cyclone and vaulted ceilings should be checked regularly through the inspection openings in the ceilings to see if the transition between the brick masonry and the skin is flush. In addition, skin temperature should be compared to earlier measurements in order to gain information about the current refractory status.
Easily accessible part of the cooler, burner pipe or the kiln can also be inspected visually via inspection openings or kiln/cooler cameras. Such an inspection is especially suitable during sort down times as easy inspection measures.
Non-destructive measurements of residual brick thickness: The brick thickness can be measured relatively quickly using a residual thickness metre. But experience shows that generally no reliable measurement signals are provided. Residual thickness metres work with sensitive probe systems that can send and record high frequency electrical impulses. The metallic rotary kiln shell serves as a reflector to determine the residual wall thickness. This device also allows for the different electromagnetic properties of different refractory bricks and infiltration to be recorded.
Drill holes and chiselling out of windows: The residual brick height of the refractory material is determined along the rotary kiln by drilling with a brick drill (9-10 mm). The procedure and results are recorded in a drilling protocol. Brick damage is not always detected with the drilling samples. Using core drilling or chiselling of windows in critical spots, it is possible to detect crack formation or alkali filtration in addition to the residual brick height. However, the subsequent closure of the masonry is unsatisfactory with this method if the residual brick height is low.
What are the major challenges your organisation comes across with the refractory kiln?
- Spalling of bricks in the burning zone: We use ISO type of bricks in the burning zone in kilns. Refractories develop the spalling because of the mismatch of thermal expansion or contraction in between hot face and cold face during heating – cooling cycle and as a result, cracks are developed in the brick. This crack propagates every time and ultimately some portion of the brick gets spelled out from the position.
- Kiln bricks failure near second tyre: Due to mechanical loading as well as thermal loading, bricks failure occurs near kiln 2nd tyre area. Whenever this failure happens, then in this area brick lining is done with a manual jack method
- Tip casting failure: Kiln tip casting failure occurs every 3 to 4 months of continuous running of kiln. Earlier shuttering panel was 400Ă—400 mm as the first kiln outlet retainer was just after 400 mm from the kiln outlet. After modification, outlet retainer shifted towards inlet about 400 mm, i.e., now tip casting shuttering increased to 800Ă—800 mm. It gives us a maximum tip casting life of about 11 months.
What innovations in the refractory sector do you expect to see in the near future that will help better it?
The two main innovations that we foresee are:
AFR friendly refractory: Due to the increasing fuel cost and focus on sustainable ways of operations, the use of alternative fuels in cement industries is essential. Though, the use of alternative fuels is limited because of the high concentration of chlorine and sulphates which are susceptible to coating formation. Therefore, coating resistant refractories that are less prone to chlorine and sulphate attacks will increase the use of alternative fuels with a good refractory life. Moreover, with the enhanced use of AFR, we require good quality AFR friendly castable near AFR feeding zones.
Insulating Bricks: Refractories with low thermal conductivity and low radiation emissivity can help to save the heat losses that ultimately leads to saving fuel, instead of increasing refractory thickness. While by increasing the refractory thickness a loss of volume in pyro-equipment may affect the production capability of the system. Therefore, we required high alumina with low thermal conductivity refractory bricks to save the radiation loss.
–Kanika Mathur
You may like
-
Protect Your Margins
-
Foundation is always product performance
-
JK Cement Plans To Boost Capacity Utilisation And Premiumisation
-
JK Cement To Target Higher Capacity Utilisation And Premiumisation
-
JK Cement Declared Preferred Bidder For Gilund Limestone Block
-
Modern manufacturing is becoming challenging
Concrete
CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech
To build capacity of 100,000 tonnes a year
Published
2 days agoon
August 28, 2026By
admin
CarbonStrong has raised Rs 125 million (125 mn) to scale a low carbon cement technology and build commercial production capacity. The startup was founded in 2022 by Harsh Jain and Vikramaditya Singh and has moved from customer trials to plans for industrial supply. The company said its material replaces up to 50 per cent of cement in concrete while reducing costs and improving durability.
CarbonStrong states the product is around 30 per cent cheaper than cement and compatible with existing concrete plants, reducing the need for new equipment and operational disruption. Trials and paid pilots have been conducted in Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Chennai with demonstration projects involving ready-mix firms and precast manufacturers. Compatibility with current workflows forms a central part of the commercial strategy, aiming to ease adoption by builders and contractors.
The funding will support construction of a facility with capacity of up to 100,000 tonnes (100,000 t) a year over the next two years to supply early customers commercially. The firm is also developing materials from steel slag, copper slag and mine tailings to expand its feedstock base, while noting the technical challenge of homogenising different waste streams. Recognition by HCL ClimaForce in 2026 and by the Avaana-Startup India-NITI Aayog AIM Grand Challenge in 2025 has underscored progress.
Industry adoption remains the principal test and will require consistent material performance, supply reliability and competitive economics. CarbonStrong projects the Indian market for cement substitutes could reach Rs 250 billion (250 bn) by 2030 and has set an ambition to produce 10 million tonnes a year by 2035 (10 mn t), a target far above its near term capacity. Moving from pilots to production demands capital, manufacturing discipline and customers willing to specify the material beyond demonstrations. The recent Rs 125 million raise is intended to fund the next phase of scale and to demonstrate that industrial waste can become a dependable input for lower carbon construction.
In a research-backed article, Dr SB Hegde examines why carbon-adjusted profitability and LC3 will decide the next set of winners in cement manufacturing.
The Indian cement industry has achieved world-class operational efficiency through lower specific energy consumption, high plant utilisation and a reduced average clinker factor of approximately 67.5 per cent. These traditional measures of operational excellence remain essential. However, they are no longer sufficient. Carbon now carries a measurable financial cost under India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) and under European carbon markets. Future leadership will be defined by carbon-adjusted profitability, the ability to generate strong returns while systematically lowering the carbon intensity of every ton sold.
Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) offers a practical, scalable pathway to achieve this dual objective. By replacing up to 50 per cent of clinker with calcined clay and limestone, LC3 can reduce CO2 emissions by 30–40 per cent while delivering comparable or superior durability performance.
This article examines the technical foundations of LC3, European industrial practices, the emerging Indian carbon market and a concrete roadmap for Indian companies to embed carbon-adjusted metrics and LC3 into daily operations, incentives and commercial strategy.
Limits of traditional operational excellence
For many years, plant performance has been judged primarily by five indicators: specific heat consumption, specific power consumption, kiln and mill utilisation, clinker factor and overall equipment effectiveness. These metrics drove continuous improvement and helped the industry reduce energy use and increase the share of blended cement. Three structural changes have rendered them incomplete as sole measures of success.
First, carbon now carries a real or opportunity cost. Plants that improve volume or lower cash cost while raising or stagnating emissions intensity create a hidden liability that will surface as CCTS trading matures and as green procurement expands.
Second, lower-carbon products such as LC3 and high-performance blended cements are creating differentiated market segments. Customers in infrastructure, real estate and export-oriented construction are beginning to specify embodied-carbon limits.
Third, investors and lenders increasingly treat carbon intensity as a financial risk factor. Traditional KPIs can mask the divergence between short-term cash profit and long-term carbon-adjusted value.
What is carbon-adjusted profitability?
Carbon-adjusted profitability evaluates normal profit after explicit adjustment for carbon performance. A practical expression is:
Carbon-Adjusted EBITDA = Conventional EBITDA – Carbon Cost + Green Premium Income
Carbon cost may be an internal carbon price, the actual cost of purchasing Carbon Credit Certificates under CCTS, or the opportunity cost of high emissions relative to peers. Green premium income arises when customers pay more for verified lower-carbon cement or when the company sells surplus credits. Tracking both conventional and carbon-adjusted profit side-by-side gives management a clearer picture of value creation under evolving market rules.
Table 1. Traditional KPIs versus Carbon-Adjusted Leadership Metrics
Traditional Focus New Leadership Metric Why It Matters
Specific energy consumption Emissions intensity (kg CO2/t cement) Directly linked to future CCTS and CBAM costs
Kiln utilisation Carbon-adjusted contribution margin Reveals true value of incremental volume
Clinker factor Share of lower-carbon products sold (incl. LC3) Measures commercial success of the transition
Power cost per tonne Effective carbon cost per tonne sold Expose hidden liabilities
Absolute EBITDA Carbon-adjusted EBITDA + green premium Aligning profit with future market reality
LC3: Technical foundations and performance advantages
LC3 is a ternary blended cement that typically combines approximately 50 per cent clinker, 30 per cent calcined clay, 15 per cent limestone and 5 per cent gypsum (the classic LC3-50 formulation). The decisive technical advantage is that clay is calcined at 700–850 °C, far below the 1,450 °C required for clinker production. This lower temperature, together with the substantial reduction in clinker content, delivers CO2 reductions of 30–40 per cent relative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC).
Chemistry is synergistic. Calcined kaolinitic clay (metakaolin) reacts with calcium hydroxide from clinker hydration and with limestone to form additional C-A-S-H gel and carboaluminate phases. These phases densify the microstructure, reduce porosity and improve durability.
Field experience shows superior resistance to chloride ingress, sulphate attack and alkali–silica reaction. Early-age strength can match OPC with high-reactivity clays; later-age strengths routinely meet 42.5 and 52.5 grade requirements.
Importantly, LC3 does not require high-purity kaolin. Clays with 40 per cent or even lower kaolinite content can be activated successfully, expanding raw-material availability across India. Calcination can use adapted rotary kilns or dedicated flash calciners, making the technology compatible with existing plant infrastructure and far less capital-intensive than carbon capture.
Economic analyses show that LC3 can be produced at equal or lower cost than OPC in many locations because of reduced energy demand and cheaper clay. Life-cycle assessments consistently report 30–40 per cent lower embodied CO2 per tonne of cement.
Table 2. Comparative profile: OPC versus LC3-50
Parameter OPC LC3-50
Typical clinker content ~95 per cent ~50 per cent
CO2 emissions (relative) Baseline (≈0.85 t CO2/t cement process + fuel) 30–40 per cent lower
Clay calcination temperature Not applicable 700–850 °C
Key hydration products C-S-H, portlandite, ettringite C-A-S-H + carboaluminates
Chloride & sulphate resistance Good Superior
Production cost potential Baseline Equal or lower in most locations
Infrastructure compatibility Existing High (minor adaptations)
In India, commercial adoption has begun in earnest. JK Cement commenced the first commercial production of LC3 in the Indian subcontinent at its Mangrol plant in Rajasthan in 2025 under BIS standard IS 18189.
By early 2026, approximately 2,000 tonnes had been produced and sold, avoiding an estimated 500 tonnes of CO2. JK Lakshmi Cement followed with commercial launch of its Green PRO LC3 grade from the Jaykaypuram plant. As of mid-2026, two producers are supplying LC3 to the market. The first large-scale infrastructure application is the Noida International Airport (Jewar), where LC3 was used in the runway and a building complex, demonstrating full constructability and performance under demanding conditions. These early volumes are still small relative to national cement demand, but they mark the critical transition from pilot to commercial reality. Companies that scale capacity now will be positioned to capture both CCTS credits and emerging green-procurement demand.
Why the shift is accelerating
According to the World Bank’s State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026, direct carbon pricing now covers nearly 30 per cent of global greenhouse-gas emissions and generated more than US$107 billion in public revenue in 2025. The average global carbon price stands at approximately US$21 per tonne, although regional prices vary widely.
In Europe, the EU ETS price has traded near €80–85 per tonen in mid-2026. Free allocation for cement is being withdrawn in parallel with CBAM. European producers therefore face a clear signal: every tonne of avoided CO2 improves both compliance and competitiveness. Holcim has scaled calcined-clay production, including Europe’s first dedicated line at Saint-Pierre-la-Cour (France) and a second line in the Czech Republic (2026). Heidelberg Materials, Cementir (FUTURECEM) and others have commercialised low-clinker calcined-clay blends across multiple markets, showing that carbon-adjusted profitability is already reshaping capital allocation in the world’s most mature carbon market.India’s CCTS is now operational. Binding emission intensity targets apply to 186 cement facilities for FY 2025–26 and FY 2026–27. Average required reductions for integrated plants are modest (around 2.7 per cent by FY 2027), yet the direction is clear.
Trading of Carbon Credit Certificates is expected in the second half of 2026, with early prices likely in the `800–1,500 per tonne range. Plants that outperform targets can sell credits; those that underperform must buy them or face compensation. Cement is well positioned to be a net supplier of credits if clinker factor continues to fall through LC3 and other low-clinker systems.
Way forward for India
India starts from a strong baseline, world-class energy efficiency and a clinker factor already lower than the global average. The next competitive frontier is the deliberate reduction of process emissions through clinker substitution at scale. LC3 is uniquely suited to Indian conditions because suitable clays are widely distributed, the technology fits existing kiln and grinding infrastructure, and the resulting product can meet the performance demands of both infrastructure and building construction.
A practical national pathway contains five interlocking elements:
- Standards and acceptance: Accelerated finalisation and promotion of BIS specifications for calcined-clay and limestone–calcined-clay cements will remove a key barrier to commercial uptake. Alignment with European practice (EN 197-5) can facilitate knowledge transfer and export readiness.
- Supply-chain development: Investment in flash calcination capacity and systematic characterisation of regional clay deposits will secure reliable, low-cost feedstock. Existing rotary kilns can be adapted for initial volumes while dedicated calciners are built.
- Incentive alignment: Part of variable compensation for plant managers, sales teams and senior leadership should be linked to emissions intensity reduction and to the volume of lower-carbon products (including LC3) sold. Without this link, traditional volume and cost targets will continue to dominate behaviour.
- Product-level carbon accounting: Reliable measurement of emissions intensity at the individual cement grade level, supported by third-party verification where required, is essential for both CCTS compliance and credible green claims.
- Demand-side pull: Green public procurement policies that specify maximum embodied-carbon thresholds for major infrastructure projects will create a predictable market for LC3 and other low-carbon cements, accelerating scale and cost reduction.
Companies that treat LC3 as a strategic product line rather than a niche offering will be better positioned to generate surplus Carbon Credit Certificates, capture any emerging green premium, and protect margins as carbon costs rise.
Organisational changes required
Technical capability alone is insufficient. Three organisational shifts are required.
Daily management: Emissions intensity must appear on the same daily and monthly dashboards as heat consumption, power consumption and utilization. Plant reviews should examine both conventional and carbon-adjusted results.
Incentives: A meaningful portion of bonuses for plant heads, technical teams and sales leadership should be tied to lower emissions intensity and successful commercialisation of LC3 and other low-carbon grades.
Commercial approach: Sales teams need clear volume and pricing targets for lower-carbon products, supported by technical service that helps customers specify and place the material correctly. Without commercial pull, excellent technical performance remains under-utilised.
Table 3. Three-stage roadmap to carbon-adjusted profitability
Time Horizon Priority Actions Expected Outcome
Next 12 months Add emissions intensity to plant dashboards; establish internal carbon price; initiate LC3 pilot production and customer trials Visibility and early organisational learning
12–24 months Revise incentive systems; scale LC3 and other low-carbon grades to key accounts; secure third-party verification capability People and sales aligned with carbon goals
24–36 months Embed carbon-adjusted metrics in board reporting and capital allocation; expand calcined-clay capacity Full system integration and competitive advantage
Questions senior leaders should ask
Boards can accelerate the transition by insisting on answers to a short list of questions:
• Is our carbon-adjusted profit improving, stable or declining relative to conventional EBITDA?
• Did recent volume growth improve or worsen our emissions intensity?
• What share of sales already comes from lower-carbon products, including LC3, and what is the trajectory?
• How exposed is our capital expenditure plan to rising carbon costs under CCTS and potential CBAM-related requirements?
• Do our incentive systems still reward only volume and cost, or have they been updated to include carbon performance?
Treating carbon with the same seriousness as energy cost or kiln utilization does not diminish operational excellence; it expands the definition of excellence to match the new competitive reality.
Looking ahead
By 2030 the gap between leading and lagging cement companies will not be decided by who records the lowest specific heat consumption. It will be decided by who delivers the strongest carbon-adjusted profits.
Absolute emissions may still rise as national production grows. That is not the issue. Companies that reduce intensity year after year and successfully sell cleaner products will pull ahead in both domestic and export markets. Those that do not will fall behind, even if their traditional efficiency numbers look strong.
Operational excellence built the Indian cement industry. It remains the foundation. It is no longer the complete picture. Carbon-adjusted profitability is the clearer measure of success.
LC3 is not a distant technology. It is available now. It cuts CO3 by 30–40 per cent, works with existing plants, and is already in commercial production in India. Companies that treat it as a strategic product, not a pilot, will protect their margins and generate tradable credits.
Leaders who act now will place carbon metrics on daily dashboards, link incentives to intensity reduction and LC3 sales, invest in calcined-clay capacity, and build commercial capability to sell lower-carbon products. They will shape the next chapter of the industry.
References
- World Bank. (2026). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
- International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). (2026). India Carbon Credit Trading Scheme – Status and Coverage. Berlin: ICAP.
- Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Bureau of Energy Efficiency. (2025). Greenhouse Gases Emission Intensity Target Rules, 2025. New Delhi: Government of India.
- Scrivener, K., Martirena, F., Bishnoi, S., & Maity, S. (2018). Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 49–56.
- RMI. (2024). The Business Case for LC3. Rocky Mountain Institute.
- European Commission. (2026). EU Emissions Trading System – Allowance Price Data and Free Allocation Phase-out Schedule. Brussels.
- Holcim. (2025–2026). Scaling Calcined Clay for Sustainable Building – Corporate Updates on European and Latin American Capacity. Zurich: Holcim Ltd.
- LC3 Project / EPFL. (2026). LC3 – A Guide to Best Practices for Scalable, Affordable and Sustainable Low-Carbon Building. Lausanne: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
- Business Today / Industry Reports. (2026). First Large-Scale LC3 Application at Noida International Airport, Jewar. New Delhi.
- NITI Aayog / Industry Analyses. (2026). Roadmap and Baseline Performance Indicators for the Indian Cement Sector. New Delhi.
- Springer / Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. (2026). LC3 Systems: A Review of Chemistry, Performance, Durability and Sustainability toward Market Adoption.
- Cementir Holding / Industry Sources. (2025–2026). FUTURECEM and Related Low-Clinker Technologies in Europe.
- Climate Risk Horizons & Independent Analyses. (2026). Assessment of Emission Intensity Targets under India’s CCTS for Cement and Other Hard-to-Abate Sectors.
- GCCA / TERI. (Various years). Decarbonization Roadmaps for the Indian Cement Industry.
- EN 197-5:2021. Cement – Part 5: Portland-composite cement CEM II/C-M and Composite cement CEM VI. European Committee for Standardization.
Concrete
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
Published
2 days agoon
August 28, 2026By
admin
Dijam Panigrahi makes a counterintuitive but data-backed argument that routing every sensor alert through human approval does not make cement plants safer.
India’s cement industry has spent the last two years wiring kilns, mills and coolers with sensors and automated control systems, and the safety case for doing so is strong on paper. Contract workers still make up the majority of the industry’s workforce, and fatal accidents remain a recurring problem. The Indian National Cement Workers Federation has noted that around 83 per cent of workers in the sector hold precarious positions, a fact that resurfaced after an oxygen cylinder explosion killed three contract workers at a plant in Chhattisgarh.
Industry tallies compiled by IndustriALL found cement plants recorded at least seventeen accidents in one year with 21 workers killed, and ten accidents the following year with nine killed, most of them contract staff. Automated monitoring, in theory, closes that gap. A sensor never gets complacent and never skips a check because a shift is short staffed.
However, plants that respond by routing every anomaly reading to a person for approval are quietly building a system that fails the same way understaffing does. When operators receive dozens of flagged deviations a shift, most of them minor, they learn a simple lesson: the fastest way through the queue is to approve without reading closely. The safety benefit disappears, not because the technology failed, but because the humans supervising it adapted to the volume.
Why alerts get ignored
A study cited by manufacturing technology publisher Applied SmartFactory found more than 95 per cent of alarms in a semiconductor fab were low priority, and only about 4 per cent ever triggered an action, with just 100 out of 5,000 alarms accounting for 70 per cent of all alarm activity. The mechanism is the same whether the trigger is a vibration sensor or an AI model flagging a kiln temperature swing. Once the ratio of noise to signal crosses a threshold, workers stop treating the system as a decision aid and start treating it as a formality to clear.
The scale of AI deployment underway makes this more than a theoretical risk. Stanford’s 2026 AI Index Report found organisational adoption of AI has reached 88 per cent, even as documented AI incidents rose to 362 in 2025, up sharply from 233 the year before, according to analysis of the report. The Index also found only about a third of organisations have adopted a formal governance framework, with NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework cited by 33 per cent and ISO/IEC 42001 cited by 36 per cent.
Most manufacturers are deploying monitoring systems faster than they are building the judgment for when a flagged event actually needs a person’s attention. In India, plants run by JK Cement have begun pairing CCTV feeds with AI to define safe zones around heavy machinery, a promising direction that still depends on operators trusting and reading the alerts the system generates.
A three-tier model for cement plant
The fix is not less monitoring or more monitoring. It is classifying decisions by risk and by novelty, rather than treating human oversight as a single switch that is either on or off. A workable model sorts factory floor events into three tiers.
The first tier, proceed, covers deviations the plant has seen before that fall within known safe bounds, such as a kiln feed rate adjustment within an established range. These should run without a stop for approval, because routing them to a person only trains that person to click through.
The second tier, pause, covers events that are unusual but not yet dangerous, such as a vibration reading trending toward a limit or a fuel blend shifting outside its typical mix. These warrant a brief human check before the system proceeds, giving an operator the chance to apply judgment the model does not yet have.
The third tier, escalate, covers events that are both high risk and unfamiliar, such as a pressure reading combined with a temperature spike that has no close precedent in the plant’s history. These should stop the process entirely and require a decision from someone with the authority to shut down a line.
Who should set the threshold
Where these tiers get drawn matters as much as the framework itself. Threshold setting is frequently handed to the vendor supplying the monitoring software or to a plant’s IT department, both of which understand the technology but not the specific tolerances of a given kiln, mill or line. Operations staff, who know that a particular grinding unit runs hotter under monsoon humidity or that a calciner behaves differently after a refractory reline, are better positioned to calibrate what counts as routine on their own equipment.
Handing threshold ownership to operations does not remove IT or vendors from the process, but it puts the calibration decision closest to the people who live with its consequences on the floor.
Signals that oversight is actually working
A few concrete indicators reveal whether a monitoring setup is functioning as intended or simply providing the appearance of safety. The escalation rate over time is the first: a rate that stays flat or climbs slowly as operations mature is healthy, while one that spikes and then falls sharply often means operators have started overriding the system rather than engaging with it. Time to resolution is the second: escalations that take progressively longer to close suggest fatigue or confusion about ownership, not diligence. The third, and most telling, is how accurate the system’s own uncertainty estimates turn out to be, meaning whether events flagged as high risk actually correlated with real incidents, and whether events waved through stayed incident free. A system whose escalations do not track with actual outcomes trains operators toward the same complacency that unmonitored equipment produces.
None of this argues against automation in Indian cement manufacturing, where a labor structure built on contract work and a track record of serious accidents make better monitoring an urgent need. It argues for treating human oversight as a design problem with three distinct settings, rather than a single
dial turned up whenever a plant wants to look safer on paper.
About the author:
Dijam Panigrahi, Co-founder and COO, GridRaster, is a spatial computing platform for industrial enterprises and manufacturers.
CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech
Protect Your Margins
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
The biggest gap arises from inconsistent leadership
The Future of Vertical Material Handling
CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech
Protect Your Margins
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
The biggest gap arises from inconsistent leadership

