Connect with us

Concrete

For successful project delivery, promptness and proactive action is the key

Published

on

Shares

Bidyut Bhattacharya, Technical Director, Sinoma International Engg Co India

There are ample challenges in putting up a cement plant these days. Scope changes during the implementation phase can be a big drag. It is extremely important to review capability and past credentials of the engineering firm, says Bidyut Bhattacharya, Technical Director, Sinoma International Engg Co India. Excerpts from the interview.

Which are the geographical regions that are driving demand in your sector?

Generally speaking, overall the scenario is a bit muted these days. In spite of overcapacity issues, we still see movement in the Andhra- Karnataka belt.

What are the major challenges that you face when it comes to the design, erection and commissioning of a cement plant?

There are ample challenges in putting up a cement plant these days. Scope changes during the implementation phase can be a big drag. Sometimes, not-so-clear regulatory requirements also lead to changes in scope. Then there are instances of revision on plant capacity during execution. Often, such changes are the result of inadequate feasibility studies done at the project planning stage. It is extremely important to review capability and past credentials of the engineering firm.

Availability of construction labour force (skilled/semiskilled) also is a major challenge these days. These workers mostly come from the eastern part of India. Maintaining adequate site strength during or just after the festival seasons becomes a nightmare. Productivity is also an issue and falls far below the levels achieved in even other emerging economies.

Another aspect is basic awareness about health and safety requirements on construction sites. Unfortunately, in India, safety consciousness is rather limited even up to the technician level, and falls very short of the expectations of multinational companies.

Getting final regulatory clearances before commissioning could also be a challenge, particularly if you are not so well versed in handling such issues in a prudent way. Finally, the sluggish economy is taking its toll on the clients and their ability to clear the monthly dues and other payments on time. Such a scenario and delayed payments become a real challenge for the project progress and time/cost overruns may be unavoidable in spite of all good intentions.

Changing the layout, in many cases, seems to be a major issue. Does it indicate the inadequacy of project management team?

In extreme cases, we have seen layout changes happening during the execution phase. This is frustrating for anyone involved in the project, and leads to time and cost overruns, apart from possible disputes with the client. Quite often, such layout changes can be attributed to land acquisition problems or to geo-technical reasons. Considering long term requirements for the finalisation of land acquisition, some amount of work is done on a parallel track. You cannot always blame the project management for inadequate risk perception.

However, when it comes to layout changes due to inadequate geo-technical investigations upfront, project management cannot avoid the blame. It is important to conduct a detailed soil investigation and firm up foundation requirements during the feasibility phase of any project. My experience says that multinational companies are generally more demanding in terms of feasibility study requirements.

What is the scenario regarding the repair / retrofitting of existing plants?

We, as Sinoma, are less involved in this particular field directly, as far as India is concerned. However, LNVT India, our subsidiary in India, has a vast experience in retrofit jobs.

How do you assess the interface between a consulting agency, cement manufacturers and various plant and machinery OEMs and auxiliary equipment suppliers?

The consultant is almost always employed by the owner and plays a vital role as the interface between the client and the contractor. In spite of that, it is important on the part of the consultants to project a more neutral stance. I strongly believe that an impartial consultant actually aids the overall implementation of the project to a great extent. In that sense, the FIDIC concept seems more productive to the interests of the project.

How do you tackle unforeseen problems while executing big projects?

Project execution is not a cakewalk and the project management needs to be on their toes throughout. Unexpected problems are bound to crop up, and the team needs to consider all possible options, one by one, and select the optimum. Pressures due to time/cost overruns makes life more difficult. For successful project delivery, promptness and proactive action is the key. For example, in a recent project, while excavating for the deep wagon tippler pit, we encountered an isolated patch of extremely hard rock. The geotechnical investigation conducted earlier a few meters from the spot, did not identify it. Various sizes of rock breakers were employed but they failed to achieve the desired result. Considering the project being implemented inside an operating plant and in an extremely congested layout, an alternative decision was not easy. Layout change was absolutely out of question. Eventually we had to think about not just controlled blasting but super controlled blasting – which did work. Swift and proactive decision- making in terms of the best available option was the key.

What kinds of energy efficiency measures do you recommend to your clients?

In terms of overall energy efficiency, at Sinoma we strongly recommend waste heat recovery from both kiln and grate cooler. For the coolers themselves, we recommend fourth-generation walking floor type or moving bar/S- type grate coolers. High efficiency high momentum burner pipes are a must. Modern design, low pressure drop – high efficiency pre-heater cyclones also plays an important part. For grinding, we recommend roll press and vertical mills depending upon the process and materials.

The amount of energy saving varies on a case- to- case basis depending on the actual selection of process and equipment, quality and consistency of fuel, raw material characteristics, etc. However, it is important to understand here that long- term plant energy efficiency cannot be guaranteed based on the mere selection of the most efficient individual equipment alone. Rather, over a long term, energy (fuel and power) efficiency is largely driven by uniformity of the kiln feed chemistry, mastery of the burning zone which is primarily a kiln operation, and plant reliability factor i.e, avoiding stoppages due to incidents; all this in turn, relates to plant preventive maintenance.

What is your take on the lack of highly skilled technicians and experienced engineers in your sector?

We do not see a lack of skilled technicians or engineers as a real problem in India. Particularly in the field of construction, the right supervisory people are available at a reasonable cost. We feel the real problem here is availability of a sufficiently skilled labour force. Thanks to the MGNREGA scheme, a large shortage has been created. The majority of these construction workers come from the eastern part of India these days, and their availability during or after the festive season also affects site activity. Site productivity per unit of manpower deployed remains a bottleneck. Also, a serious problem is the lack of knowledge/understanding of basic health and safety requirements. In the highly skilled sector, the issues have to do with attitude/motivation rather than technical skills or knowledge.

Opportunities and challenges for EPC companies in India

Firstly, with promoters like multinational companies such as Lafarge, Holcim, Heidelberg, ItalCementi etc, EPC projects in the cement industry has now become widespread in the Middle East, African continent, south-east Asia, China, Russia and South America. However, EPC has not yet taken root in India. In the past ten years, most of the new cement production line projects were tendered and executed in a number of packages. However, in order to avoid potential risks to the owner (such as delayed project schedule, missed interfaces, etc), and to cap the investment during the execution of the project, these international leaders still look for EPC. The Holcim Group’s recent 9000tpd project could probably be a milestone project for the future of the Indian cement industry, one which all the EPC companies are keeping a close eye on. If the project is a success, it may usher in a new era for the Indian cement industry.

Also, smaller-sized cement producers, especially new entrants, will have a better appetite for EPC, unlike leading cement companies who have full- fledged project engineering and management teams. Clients in this segment are keen to minimise their overheads, while focusing on faster returns on investment with minimum risk. EPC will be a good choice for them. On the other hand, for plants requiring repair/retrofitting projects and new installation of WHR system, EPC will be the best solution. We strongly believe that in the near future, the Indian cement industry will replicate the most popular international model i.e, EPC. It may not be very prudent to assess the bottomline before the start of the project alone. Delays and cost overruns at the end of most of the projects will prompt clients to rethink their contracting mode. A successful project goes beyond mere mix- and- match of best available equipment, timely completion and capping on cost is vital. Clearly, more EPC players will emerge, catering to the needs of the new age Indian cement industry. The biggest challenge, however, to the contractors, is the actual strength in integrating EP and C. Typical equipment manufacturers look for a pure EP as they often lack major construction experience or are reluctant to take the risk. Quite often, the OEMs have to form a JV for the execution of a real EPC project. Other challenges involve delays in regulatory clearances, high inflationary trends and a high interest rate scenario resulting in serious cost overruns of delayed projects, availability of a sufficiently skilled labour force throughout, reduced economic growth resulting in the client’s ability to clear its payment obligations on time and of course, the complicated prevailing tax regime, till GST rollout.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Concrete

UltraTech to Deploy 600+ Electric Trucks by Dec 2026

Cement major expands green logistics to cut emissions across supply chain

Published

on

By

Shares
UltraTech Cement Limited, an Aditya Birla Group company, plans to expand its electric vehicle fleet in logistics operations to more than 600 EV trucks by December 2026, strengthening its green transport initiatives.
The company has signed service agreements with leading EV prime mover manufacturers, including Tata Motors, Ashok Leyland, IPLTech, Energy in Motion and Sany, along with their subsidiaries and logistics partners, for deploying electric trucks.
The expanded fleet will transport around five million MT of clinker and other key materials annually across Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra and Odisha. Once operational, the fleet is expected to reduce annual CO₂ emissions by over 1,17,000 tonnes and replace nearly 39 million litres of diesel consumption.
K C Jhanwar, Managing Director, UltraTech Cement Limited, said the company is extending sustainability beyond its manufacturing plants by adopting greener logistics solutions and decarbonising its value chain.
UltraTech has been among the early adopters of sustainable transport in the cement sector, introducing CNG trucks in 2021 and electric trucks in 2024. The company currently operates more than 850 trucks under its green logistics programme, including CNG and electric vehicles.
With a grey cement capacity exceeding 200 MTPA in India, UltraTech is integrating electrification across its logistics network, covering mine-to-plant movement and inter-plant transportation of clinker and other materials.

Continue Reading

Concrete

UltraTech Cement expands green logistics with 600+ electric truck fleet

Published

on

By

Shares

The e-truck fleet will be used to transport five million MT of clinker and other key materials with potential of over 1,17,000 tonnes of net annual CO₂ reduction, displacing the equivalent of 39 million litres of diesel per year.

Mumbai

UltraTech Cement Limited, an Aditya Birla Group company and the world’s largest cement company by sales volume and capacity outside China, has announced that it will scale up its electric vehicle fleet in its logistics operations to 600+ EV trucks by December 2026.

UltraTech has signed service contracts with leading EV prime mover manufacturers including Tata Motors, Ashok Leyland, IPLTech, Energy in Motion and Sany, along with their subsidiaries and other third-party logistics providers, to deploy EV trucks.

The total fleet of 600+ EV trucks will transport about five million MT of clinker and other key materials per annum across Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra and Odisha. Once fully operational, this fleet of over 600 EV trucks will enable a net annual CO₂ reduction of more than 1,17,000 tonnes, displacing the equivalent of 39 million litres of diesel per year.

K C Jhanwar, Managing Director, UltraTech Cement Limited, said, “UltraTech is expanding sustainability beyond its plants by adopting greener logistics solutions. This large-scale transition to green logistics underscores our focus on decarbonising every link of our value chain and supports our commitment to achieving Net Zero.”

UltraTech has been a pioneer in advancing sustainable transport in the cement sector, being the first cement company to deploy heavy-duty electric trucks for long-haul transport of clinker and other materials at scale. The company was among the first in India to introduce green logistics, deploying CNG trucks in 2021 and electric trucks in 2024. UltraTech currently operates 850+ trucks as part of its green logistics operations, including CNG and electric trucks.

UltraTech, with a grey cement capacity of over 200 MTPA in India, operates one of the country’s most complex logistics networks. Its electrification strategy covers the entire supply chain—from mine-to-plant movement to inter-plant transport of clinker and other key materials.

The $ 10 billion UltraTech, the cement flagship company of the Aditya Birla Group, has a total Grey Cement capacity of 205.5 MTPA and White Cement/Putty capacity of 3.2 MTPA. It is a signatory to the GCCA Climate Ambition 2050 and has committed to the Net Zero Concrete roadmap announced by GCCA.

Continue Reading

Concrete

CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech

To build capacity of 100,000 tonnes a year

Published

on

By

Shares



CarbonStrong has raised Rs 125 million (125 mn) to scale a low carbon cement technology and build commercial production capacity. The startup was founded in 2022 by Harsh Jain and Vikramaditya Singh and has moved from customer trials to plans for industrial supply. The company said its material replaces up to 50 per cent of cement in concrete while reducing costs and improving durability.

CarbonStrong states the product is around 30 per cent cheaper than cement and compatible with existing concrete plants, reducing the need for new equipment and operational disruption. Trials and paid pilots have been conducted in Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Chennai with demonstration projects involving ready-mix firms and precast manufacturers. Compatibility with current workflows forms a central part of the commercial strategy, aiming to ease adoption by builders and contractors.

The funding will support construction of a facility with capacity of up to 100,000 tonnes (100,000 t) a year over the next two years to supply early customers commercially. The firm is also developing materials from steel slag, copper slag and mine tailings to expand its feedstock base, while noting the technical challenge of homogenising different waste streams. Recognition by HCL ClimaForce in 2026 and by the Avaana-Startup India-NITI Aayog AIM Grand Challenge in 2025 has underscored progress.

Industry adoption remains the principal test and will require consistent material performance, supply reliability and competitive economics. CarbonStrong projects the Indian market for cement substitutes could reach Rs 250 billion (250 bn) by 2030 and has set an ambition to produce 10 million tonnes a year by 2035 (10 mn t), a target far above its near term capacity. Moving from pilots to production demands capital, manufacturing discipline and customers willing to specify the material beyond demonstrations. The recent Rs 125 million raise is intended to fund the next phase of scale and to demonstrate that industrial waste can become a dependable input for lower carbon construction.

Continue Reading

Video Thumbnail

    SIGN-UP FOR OUR GENERAL NEWSLETTER


    Trending News

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

     

    Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

     


      This will close in 0 seconds