With over three decades of experience behind him in the sector, Dr Shailendra Chouksey, Whole-Time Director, JK Lakshmi Cement is often credited with having transformed the perception of cement as just another commodity to branded category. In this exclusive interaction with INDIAN CEMENT REVIEW in New Delhi, Dr Chouksey says that infrastructure creation will drive demand growth of cement by also providing a fillip to housing. Noting that the next phase of increase in capacity will come from greenfield plants, he informs that the industry is watching the development of inland waterways as a cost-effective mode of transport.
You have been saying that the cement sector is showing the green shoots of a revival after a prolonged period of subdued growth. How?
It is the growth in demand that we have witnessed in the last 12 months that has made me say that. While the figure of 14 per cent looks attractive, we have to remind ourselves that it is on the back of a base that was very muted. Taking that into account, even the growth of about 9 per cent – which the industry has witnessed close to after a gap of nearly six years – is quite healthy. And that’s something to cheer rather than be unduly pessimistic about. The other reason that makes us buoyant is that this demand has basically been fuelled by the initiatives of the government that are long-term in nature; so, there is an element of sustainability there. We would tend to believe that we are back in good times and this demand growth of 8-9 per cent is here to stay. It would eventually lead to a double-digit expansion because countries like China, Indonesia and others that have grown at a phenomenal pace in the past have demonstrated that infrastructure creation culminates in the demand for cement.
It is conventionally believed that the growth in cement sector is delivered by the housing segment. However, you just averred that the next phase of growth in the sector will be delivered by infrastructure development. That’s indeed a very interesting observation.
The reason why people tend to pin a lot of hopes on housing is that in India the segment still constitutes 60 per cent of the demand for cement. Any change there will have a much greater impact on growth, while infrastructure constitutes 20-25 per cent. Therefore, even if the infrastructure grows by 30-40 per cent, it can only translate into 7-8 per cent. Now a logical question would be that how can one expect a much steeper growth just on the back of infrastructure? But what we feel is that the moment our infrastructure expands, development of housing in areas surrounding such projects is bound to increase. Take the example of the metro railway in Delhi.
Wherever it has reached or whenever a new phase is planned, the housing activity there receives a spurt since the connectivity becomes a lot easier. Similarly, road infrastructure or any other project requiring cement, also provides a boost to housing.
In fact, at times it is very difficult to segregate the vanilla effect of infrastructure development and housing. There is a bit of intertwining there and we tend to believe that if the infrastructure is growing at 20-25 per cent, there is bound to be a cascading impact on the other segments that consume cement.
Which segments within the infra universe do you see as contributing to the cement industry’s growth over the next five years?
The road and highway projects will continue to be a major driver. But then we also feel that the metro rail fever is gradually spreading. And the best part is that it is being driven by the public through their representatives. Today, every member of parliament would like to establish a metro rail project in his constituency. There is hardly a state capital that is not talking about a metro project. The metro railway is a phenomenal cement consuming sector. And then again it has a ripple or downstream effect on the development of housing and commercial real estate, which in turn provides a spurt to a whole lot of construction activity. Going forward, metro rail projects would be another important area of cement consumption. Then we have already seen the Dedicated Freight Corridors (DFC) where work is underway and that will continue over the next three to four years. These are some of the important infrastructure projects that will drive the demand for cement. Along with these, there is an aspect that shouldn’t be missed and that is our GDP is growing and so is the purchasing power of the people. And that will result in individual housing construction.
What about the contribution from the smart cities programme of the government?
Well, one has to wait and watch. Initially, when the programme was announced, it was believed it would result in the development of greenfield cities. But gradually the government has realised that there is more to milked from the existing cities by making them smart. Therefore, though the construction might not happen at that pace that was anticipated, there would surely be ancillary developments around smart cities.
In India, the freight of cement has been done by road. With several waterways under development, do you see potential there?
Since it’s a whole new world that is opening up it would be too early on my part to comment on how it will eventually pan out. But at the end of the day, it is the money that talks. If cement manufacturers discover that it makes more economic sense to transport cement and other raw materials on waterways, they will most certainly make that shift. And that will not only be on account of the cost factor but also due to the increased regulation on the carriage of goods by road such as overloading, the high cost of toll that has pushed up freight rates, spike in fuel prices and the Indian Railways increasing freight charges.
Especially in the case of the railway, there is a certain minimum ticket size of freight and transporting less than that doesn’t really make economic sense for a cement manufacturer. Therefore, taking into account all these factors, we might have a good opportunity as far as the development of waterways is concerned. But one has to first test that out and then the network of waterways has to be well-spread out across the country. The operational stretch from Varanasi to Kolkata is in itself a very good beginning.
There is some debate on the 28 per cent GST levied on cement, which is the same as levied on luxury goods. What’s your take?
There is no debate as such. The question that is being asked of the cement industry time and again is what percentage are we looking at. We have said that it is not a question of what percentage the government retains. It is basically about recognising the fact that cement is a core commodity, and the world over the average taxation on cement doesn’t exceed 4 per cent. Therefore, why should India tax it at the exorbitant rate of 28 per cent? We know there are economic compulsions on part of the government and it cannot suddenly slash it down and lose all that revenue. But there has also to be a recognition that there can be a percentage where it can reduce taxation to a level where an increase in demand will compensate for any loss in revenue to the exchequer. If that happens, it’s a win-win situation for both the government and cement industry.
What is your outlook for the industry in 2019?
We feel that this is a very good time for the industry. We foresee no let-up in the demand. There is already a 30 per cent excess capacity that is lying idle. Therefore, we feel the industry will first consolidate operationally. At the present rate of growth in demand for cement, this excess capacity will get exhausted in about three years. But considering the fact that a new cement plant takes quite a while to come up, my own view is that there is not much to be milked out of brownfield projects. New capacity has to come from greenfield projects. I wouldn’t be surprised if over the next couple of years, one gets to hear several announcements of new capacity additions.
Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology
India is simultaneously grappling with two crises: a mounting waste emergency and an urgent need to decarbonise its most carbon-intensive industries. The cement sector, the second-largest in the world and the backbone of the nation’s infrastructure ambitions, sits at the centre of both. It consumes enormous quantities of fossil fuel, and it has the technical capacity to consume something else entirely: the waste our cities cannot get rid of.
According to CPCB and NITI Aayog projections, India generates approximately 62.4 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with that figure expected to reach 165 million tonnes by 2030. Much of this waste is energy-rich and non-recyclable. At the same time, cement kilns operate at material temperatures of approximately 1,450 degrees Celsius, with gas temperatures reaching 2,000 degrees. This high-temperature environment is ideal for co-processing, ensuring the complete thermal destruction of organic compounds without generating toxic residues. The physics are in our favour. The infrastructure is not.
Pre-processing is not the support act for co-processing. It is the main event. Get the particle size wrong, get the moisture wrong, get the calorific value wrong and your kiln thermal stability will suffer the consequences.
The Regulatory Push Is Real
The Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules 2026 mandate that cement plants progressively replace solid fossil fuels with Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), starting at a 5 per cent baseline and scaling to 15 per cent within six years. NITI Aayog’s 2026 Roadmap for Cement Sector Decarbonisation targets 20 to 25 per cent Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) by 2030. Beyond compliance, every tonne of coal replaced by RDF generates measurable carbon reductions which is monetisable under India’s emerging Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). TSR is no longer a sustainability metric. It is a financial lever.
Yet our own field assessments across multiple Indian cement plants reveal a sobering reality: the primary barrier to scaling AFR adoption is not waste availability. It is the fragmented and under-engineered pre-processing ecosystem that sits between the waste and the kiln.
Why Indian Waste Is a Different Engineering Problem
Indian municipal solid waste is not the material that imported shredding equipment was designed for. Our waste streams frequently exceed 40 per cent to 50 per cent moisture content, particularly during monsoon cycles, saturated with abrasive inerts including sand, glass, and stone. Plants relying on imported OEM equipment face months of downtime awaiting proprietary spare parts. Machines built for segregated, low-moisture waste fail quickly and disrupt the entire pre-processing operation in Indian conditions.
The two most common failures we observe are what I call the biting teeth problem and the chewing teeth problem. Plants relying solely on a primary shredder reduce bulk waste to large fractions, but the output remains too coarse for stable kiln combustion. Others attempt to use a secondary shredder as a standalone unit without a primary stage to pre-size the feed, leading to catastrophic mechanical failure. When both stages are present but mismatched in throughput capacity, the system becomes a bottleneck. Achieving the 40 to 70 tonnes per hour required for meaningful coal displacement demands a precisely coordinated two-stage process.
Engineering a Made-in-India Answer
At Fornnax, our response to these challenges is grounded in one principle: Indian waste demands Indian engineering. Our systems are built around feedstock homogeneity, the holy grail of kiln stability. Consistent particle size and predictable calorific value are the foundation of stable kiln combustion. Without them, no TSR target is achievable at scale.
Our SR-MAX2500 Dual Shaft Primary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive) processes raw, baled, or loosely mixed MSW, C&I waste, bulky waste, and plastics, reducing them to approximately 150 mm fractions at throughputs of up to 40 tonnes per hour. The R-MAX 3300 Single Shaft Secondary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive), introduced in 2025, takes that primary output and produces RDF fractions in the 30 to 80 mm range at up to 30 tonnes per hour, specifically optimised for consistent kiln feeding. We have also introduced electric drive configurations under the SR-100 HD series, with capacities between 5 and 40 tonnes per hour, already operational at a leading Indian waste-processing facility.
Looking ahead, Fornnax is expanding its portfolio with the upcoming SR-MAX3600 Hydraulic Drive primary shredder at up to 70 tonnes per hour and the R-MAX2100 Hydraulic drive secondary shredder at up to 20 tonnes per hour, designed specifically for the large-scale throughput that higher TSR ambitions require.
The Investment Case Is Now
The 2070 Net-Zero target is not a distant goal for India’s cement sector. It starts today, with decisions being made on the plant floor.
The SWM Rules 2026 are already in effect, requiring cement plants to replace coal with RDF. Carbon credit markets are opening up, and coal prices are not going to get cheaper. Every tonne of coal a cement plant replaces with waste-derived fuel saves money on one side and generates carbon credit revenue on the other. Pre-processing infrastructure is no longer just a compliance requirement. It is a business investment with a measurable return.
The good news is that nothing is missing. The technology works. The waste is available in every Indian city. The government has provided the policy direction. The only thing standing between where the industry is today and where it needs to be is the commitment to build the right infrastructure.
The cement companies that move now will not just meet the regulations. They will be ahead of every competitor that waits.
About The Author
Jignesh Kundaria is the Director and CEO of Fornnax Technology. Over an experience spanning more than two decades in the recycling industry, he has established himself as one of India’s foremost voices on waste-to-fuel technology and alternative fuel infrastructure.
The World Cement Association (WCA) has announced SiloConnect as its newest associate corporate member, expanding its network of technology providers supporting digitalisation in the cement industry. SiloConnect offers smart sensor technology that provides real-time visibility of cement inventory levels at customer silos, enabling producers to monitor stock remotely and plan deliveries more efficiently. The solution helps companies move from reactive to proactive logistics, improving delivery planning, operational efficiency and safety by reducing manual inspections. The technology is already used by major cement producers such as Holcim, Cemex and Heidelberg Materials and is deployed across more than 30 countries worldwide.
TotalEnergies and Holcim have commissioned a floating solar power plant in Obourg, Belgium, built on a rehabilitated former chalk quarry that has been converted into a lake. The project has a generation capacity of 31 MW and produces around 30 GWh of renewable electricity annually, which will be used to power Holcim’s nearby industrial operations. The project is currently the largest floating solar installation in Europe dedicated entirely to industrial self-consumption. To ensure minimal impact on the surrounding landscape, more than 700 metres of horizontal directional drilling were used to connect the solar installation to the electrical substation. The project reflects ongoing collaboration between the two companies to support industrial decarbonisation through renewable energy solutions and innovative infrastructure development.