Cement is among the most vital ingredients required for the growth of an economy. A growth in demand for cement reflects an uptick in the activities in the business, financial, real estate and infrastructure sectors of the economy. In the last decade, cement demand has grown consistently at a multiple of over 1-1.2 times of GDP growth underpinned by the rising demand for housing and infrastructure. To meet this demand, cement companies invested briskly in expanding capacities leading to increased fund need. However, innovative methods of financing is still evolving in this brick and mortar industry. The cement industry requires financing for its working capital and capital expenditure requirement. Working capital cycle starts right from the time of material procurement, production and sale of finished goods till the realisation of sales proceeds. The primary requirement is in building up raw materials, additives, fuels, stores & spares, clinker and finished goods inventory. Debtors are generally in non-trade segment of business. The sector incurs capital expenditure for its regular capex requirement, expansion of existing capacities and setting up of new capacities.The development of industry post decontrol was dependant on fiscal incentives, financing from international institutions (IBRD, etc) and local developmental financial institutions. With the passage, just as the industry has evolved, the development financial institutions too have become banks.During the early stages, capacity addition was dependent on promoters and leveraging capabilities. The debt equity ratio of sector used to be 2 to 2.5 times of debt to equity. The sector profitability was weak so promoter/companies used to survive on fiscal incentives provided by the government. The construction activities were weak and companies were not having the financial motivation to expand. Thus, despite being one of the oldest industry, no company could acquire/add sizeable capacities to reckon with.With the opening up of the economy in 2001, together with a flourish in information technology, communication and entertainment (ICE) sectors, the demand for cement saw a sustainable growth of over 8 per cent. The profitability improved which was ploughed back in further capacity addition. Working Capital Financing Working capital needs are met through traditional banking channels. Companies opt for working capital arrangements through (i) consortium banking arrangement or (ii) multiple banking arrangement. The common modes of financing working capital are cash credit, WCDL, export packing credit, etc. However, the following two products also help companies in managing working capital.Apart from use of cash credit, WCDL & packing credit, companies also use buyers credit and supplier’s credit facilities provided by various banks. Under the buyers credit facility, banks pay to the company’s import vendors and company pays to the bank on a pre-determined date with interest. Similarly companies also use supplier’s credit facility. Channel financing: To reduce debtors in their books, companies use channel financing for its large dealers. Bankers do their own due diligence and provide credit facilities to dealers which are exclusively used for payment or clearing dues of the company. The onus on the company is the continuity of dealership. If there is disruption, companies are required to inform the banks. Financing of Capital Expenditure Long term financing usually takes the form of (i) equity (ii) debt and (iii) hybrid (mix of debt & equity). Equity: It is a permanent form of money which is mobilised by the promoters and through public participation. In case of an established company promoters can invite private equity funds. Besides companies issue ADRs/GDRs in foreign capital markets. Debt: Companies raise debt through banks and other FIs. Depending on the financial strength, companies evaluates the various debt raising options. Debt raising can be done in (i) foreign currency and (ii) rupee, and can be further segregated into secured and unsecured borrowings depending on whether any collateral has been provided to the lender. Common Modes of Long Term Financing For raising long term funds the industry uses various instruments in the domestic as well as the foreign capital markets depending on the interest cost, accessibility to various markets and risk appetite, etc.Debentures: Over the years industry has reduced the use of debentures as a mode of financing due to high interest as well as compliance cost. Proportion of debentures has reduced drastically from 34 per cent in FY06 to 14 per cent in FY10. FC/Rupee Term Loan: Foreign currency loans in the form of ECBs appeals the industry due to its low cost and rupee term loan due to its relatively low cost and flexible end use. Requirement has increased as is evident from the increase in its proportion of 48 per cent in FY 06 to 57 per cent in FY10. Sales Tax Deferment Loan: Appeal of incentives provided by various government has attracted the industry. Interest free sales tax deferment loan also improves the overall weighted average cost of theborrowings.Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCB): Some players also access international markets by issuing FCCB. It has an option to convert the bonds into equity at a pre-determined price on a specific date. Many players tie up with IFC for financing their capex needs. Companies also access ECA financing from the Exim Banks of the countries from where they are importing major equipments, ie, Hermes and Coface.
MNC’s generally borrow in local markets for local expansion and for acquisition financing they opt for offshore financing based on cost benefit analysis. Challenges faced by the industry
With rise in capital cost and longer time for implementation, judicious mix of internal accrual, equity and debt became critical.
Locally long term maturity debt papers can be placed only with life insurance companies or some banks.
Cost of borrowing in foreign currency (ECBs) is still competitive with full hedging as compared to domestic borrowings. But keeping the currency risk and interest rate risk unhedged may result/put companies into deep trouble.
With over capacity in the sector, the equity route for mobilising money is also not cheap. Equally PE money is costlier funds require exit route at a higher price.
Hence companies should have systematic approach of risk management relating to leveraging and debt servicing.
Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology
India is simultaneously grappling with two crises: a mounting waste emergency and an urgent need to decarbonise its most carbon-intensive industries. The cement sector, the second-largest in the world and the backbone of the nation’s infrastructure ambitions, sits at the centre of both. It consumes enormous quantities of fossil fuel, and it has the technical capacity to consume something else entirely: the waste our cities cannot get rid of.
According to CPCB and NITI Aayog projections, India generates approximately 62.4 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, with that figure expected to reach 165 million tonnes by 2030. Much of this waste is energy-rich and non-recyclable. At the same time, cement kilns operate at material temperatures of approximately 1,450 degrees Celsius, with gas temperatures reaching 2,000 degrees. This high-temperature environment is ideal for co-processing, ensuring the complete thermal destruction of organic compounds without generating toxic residues. The physics are in our favour. The infrastructure is not.
Pre-processing is not the support act for co-processing. It is the main event. Get the particle size wrong, get the moisture wrong, get the calorific value wrong and your kiln thermal stability will suffer the consequences.
The Regulatory Push Is Real
The Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules 2026 mandate that cement plants progressively replace solid fossil fuels with Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), starting at a 5 per cent baseline and scaling to 15 per cent within six years. NITI Aayog’s 2026 Roadmap for Cement Sector Decarbonisation targets 20 to 25 per cent Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) by 2030. Beyond compliance, every tonne of coal replaced by RDF generates measurable carbon reductions which is monetisable under India’s emerging Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). TSR is no longer a sustainability metric. It is a financial lever.
Yet our own field assessments across multiple Indian cement plants reveal a sobering reality: the primary barrier to scaling AFR adoption is not waste availability. It is the fragmented and under-engineered pre-processing ecosystem that sits between the waste and the kiln.
Why Indian Waste Is a Different Engineering Problem
Indian municipal solid waste is not the material that imported shredding equipment was designed for. Our waste streams frequently exceed 40 per cent to 50 per cent moisture content, particularly during monsoon cycles, saturated with abrasive inerts including sand, glass, and stone. Plants relying on imported OEM equipment face months of downtime awaiting proprietary spare parts. Machines built for segregated, low-moisture waste fail quickly and disrupt the entire pre-processing operation in Indian conditions.
The two most common failures we observe are what I call the biting teeth problem and the chewing teeth problem. Plants relying solely on a primary shredder reduce bulk waste to large fractions, but the output remains too coarse for stable kiln combustion. Others attempt to use a secondary shredder as a standalone unit without a primary stage to pre-size the feed, leading to catastrophic mechanical failure. When both stages are present but mismatched in throughput capacity, the system becomes a bottleneck. Achieving the 40 to 70 tonnes per hour required for meaningful coal displacement demands a precisely coordinated two-stage process.
Engineering a Made-in-India Answer
At Fornnax, our response to these challenges is grounded in one principle: Indian waste demands Indian engineering. Our systems are built around feedstock homogeneity, the holy grail of kiln stability. Consistent particle size and predictable calorific value are the foundation of stable kiln combustion. Without them, no TSR target is achievable at scale.
Our SR-MAX2500 Dual Shaft Primary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive) processes raw, baled, or loosely mixed MSW, C&I waste, bulky waste, and plastics, reducing them to approximately 150 mm fractions at throughputs of up to 40 tonnes per hour. The R-MAX 3300 Single Shaft Secondary Shredder (Hydraulic Drive), introduced in 2025, takes that primary output and produces RDF fractions in the 30 to 80 mm range at up to 30 tonnes per hour, specifically optimised for consistent kiln feeding. We have also introduced electric drive configurations under the SR-100 HD series, with capacities between 5 and 40 tonnes per hour, already operational at a leading Indian waste-processing facility.
Looking ahead, Fornnax is expanding its portfolio with the upcoming SR-MAX3600 Hydraulic Drive primary shredder at up to 70 tonnes per hour and the R-MAX2100 Hydraulic drive secondary shredder at up to 20 tonnes per hour, designed specifically for the large-scale throughput that higher TSR ambitions require.
The Investment Case Is Now
The 2070 Net-Zero target is not a distant goal for India’s cement sector. It starts today, with decisions being made on the plant floor.
The SWM Rules 2026 are already in effect, requiring cement plants to replace coal with RDF. Carbon credit markets are opening up, and coal prices are not going to get cheaper. Every tonne of coal a cement plant replaces with waste-derived fuel saves money on one side and generates carbon credit revenue on the other. Pre-processing infrastructure is no longer just a compliance requirement. It is a business investment with a measurable return.
The good news is that nothing is missing. The technology works. The waste is available in every Indian city. The government has provided the policy direction. The only thing standing between where the industry is today and where it needs to be is the commitment to build the right infrastructure.
The cement companies that move now will not just meet the regulations. They will be ahead of every competitor that waits.
About The Author
Jignesh Kundaria is the Director and CEO of Fornnax Technology. Over an experience spanning more than two decades in the recycling industry, he has established himself as one of India’s foremost voices on waste-to-fuel technology and alternative fuel infrastructure.
The World Cement Association (WCA) has announced SiloConnect as its newest associate corporate member, expanding its network of technology providers supporting digitalisation in the cement industry. SiloConnect offers smart sensor technology that provides real-time visibility of cement inventory levels at customer silos, enabling producers to monitor stock remotely and plan deliveries more efficiently. The solution helps companies move from reactive to proactive logistics, improving delivery planning, operational efficiency and safety by reducing manual inspections. The technology is already used by major cement producers such as Holcim, Cemex and Heidelberg Materials and is deployed across more than 30 countries worldwide.
TotalEnergies and Holcim have commissioned a floating solar power plant in Obourg, Belgium, built on a rehabilitated former chalk quarry that has been converted into a lake. The project has a generation capacity of 31 MW and produces around 30 GWh of renewable electricity annually, which will be used to power Holcim’s nearby industrial operations. The project is currently the largest floating solar installation in Europe dedicated entirely to industrial self-consumption. To ensure minimal impact on the surrounding landscape, more than 700 metres of horizontal directional drilling were used to connect the solar installation to the electrical substation. The project reflects ongoing collaboration between the two companies to support industrial decarbonisation through renewable energy solutions and innovative infrastructure development.