Connect with us

Concrete

Technology plays a vital role in utilising alternative materials

Published

on

Shares

Rajpal Singh Shekhawat, Senior General Manager (Production and QC),JK Lakshmi Cement, stresses on the importance of the quality of alternative raw materials in order to maintain the quality of the output.

What are the core raw materials used in the production of cement?
The first step to manufacturing cement is manufacturing the clinker. The principle raw material required to make clinker is cement grade limestone. Other raw material requirements depend upon the quality of limestone and these could be iron ores like red ochre, blue dust, laterite, alumina ores like bauxite, China clay and siliceous materials like Marl and silica sand. As far as cement is concerned for Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), clinker and
gypsum are used, for Pozzolana Portland Cement (PPC) clinker, gypsum and fly ash are used and for Portland Slag Cement (PSC) clinker, gypsum and slag are used.

What are the alternative raw materials that can be used in the production of cement? How does that impact the process of production?
Waste from the aluminium industry like red mud, waste from the marble industry like marble slurry and marble khanda, waste from the chemical industry like chemical sludge and ETP sludge, waste from the paper industry like paper sludge can be used in clinker manufacturing. For the cement manufacturing process, waste from chemical industry like chemical gypsum, waste from ceramic industry like mould gypsum, waste from zinc industry like jarosite and waste from the salt industry like marine gypsum can be used.
However, the quantity of alternative material or waste to be utilised depends a lot upon the quality of limestone and quality of other raw materials used in cement grinding. It varies from plant to plant and the quality of these alternative materials varies from source to source.

Can cement maintain its quality standard with inclusion of supplementary raw materials as against limestone?
Certainly, the quality of cement can be maintained by including these supplementary raw materials, however, the raw material proportion must be tweaked according to the quality of alternative raw material and the cost benefit analysis.

Explain the impact on carbon emission of the production unit when alternative raw materials are used in various proportions.
Carbon emission in cement manufacturing is mainly because of limestone, fuel burning, and electrical energy consumption. Majority of the CO2 emission in cement industry is from the decomposition of calcium carbonate and if we replace limestone by alternative raw material which contains calcium in any form other than carbonate, carbon emission can be reduced. For example, if we replace 1 per cent of CaO by other raw materials then around 5 kg CO2/ MT of clinker will be reduced.

How can the cost of production be reduced by using alternative or supplementary raw materials in cement production?
Cost of production depends on the plant location, limestone and raw material quality. The source of alternative raw materials for some plants are significant and in some instances because of high logistic cost economics do not work out. For example, if a cement plant is located near the industry where chemical gypsum is generated, there will be a significant gain to that particular cement plant.

What are the major challenges in using other cementitious materials?
Using alternative materials comes with their own set of challenges. Some of the challenges associated with them are high moisture content, material flowability, consistency in the material quality, chloride and sulphur content.

What role does technology play in deciding which materials can be used and incorporating them in the production process?
Certainly, technology plays a vital role in utilising alternative material, for example if drying technology is available at the plant like drier than even high moisture material can be used and handled otherwise only selected material with less moisture content are allowed.
Likewise in case of alternative fuel, if pre-processing facilities like separation of organic and combustion solid fraction, screening and pre-shredding is available then MSW can be directly used. However, when the pre-processing and shredding facility is not available at the plant then the plant requires shredded RDF <80 mm in case of in-line calciner and <40-50 mm in case of separate line calciner. Regarding utilisation of high chloride and high sulphur material if akali/chloride by-pass is installed then even high chloride/sulphur can be accepted based on the cost benefit analysis otherwise chloride input is to be restricted to 200-300gm/tonne of clinker.

Does your organisation manufacture a variant of cement made from alternative raw materials? Tell us more about its performance and use.
Yes, we are utilising various alternative raw materials like chemical gypsum, mould gypsum, ETP and phosphate sludges. Talking about chemical gypsum, its purity is more than natural gypsum. The performance of concrete made by the cement by utilising partial replacement of chemical gypsum is more cohesive than the cement made from natural gypsum. Moreover, the cement made by utilising chemical gypsum improves the workability of cement. Likewise, we utilise various alternative fuels at our premises and their consumption is being optimised looking into process and quality.
By utilising various alternative raw materials and fuels we are saving around 25 kg CO2/Mt of clinker and working on alternative materials and fuels that can reduce carbon footprints further.

How do you foresee future of production?
The per capita capital cement consumption in India is still much lower than the world average. Therefore, there is a huge potential for the industry to grow. There has been a continuous rise in the cost of fuel post covid and post the Russia-Ukraine engagement and still rising.
Owing to this, there is pressure on the industry to maintain the margins. Although, Indian cement industry is co-processing various alternative fuels and alternative raw materials to reduce its carbon footprint, it will in the future also put its focus on utilising alternative materials and fuels to bring down the cost of production.

-Kanika Mathur

Concrete

UltraTech Cement Expands in Andhra Pradesh with Rs. 26.5 bn

Petnikota plant adds 3.6 MTPA cement dispatch capacity

Published

on

By

Shares



UltraTech Cement has expanded its manufacturing footprint in Andhra Pradesh with the commissioning of Petnikota Cement Works, an integrated cement plant built with an investment of around Rs. 26.5 bn. The facility is located in Petnikota village in Kolimigundla mandal of Nandyal district, in the Rayalaseema region.

Construction of the plant began in May 2025. The facility has a clinkerisation capacity of 3.3 MTPA and a cement dispatch capacity of 3.6 MTPA, strengthening the company’s production and distribution presence in the State.

The plant is expected to provide direct employment to 650 people and indirect employment to another 2,000. It has been designed to operate entirely on green energy and does not have a captive thermal power plant. The project also uses no groundwater, according to information released by the Andhra Pradesh Government.

Nara Lokesh, Andhra Pradesh Minister for Information Technology, said in the release that the facility was taken from groundbreaking to commissioning in 14 months. He described the project as a state-of-the-art addition to the company’s operations in the State and said it would create 2,650 direct and indirect employment opportunities.

Petnikota Cement Works adds to UltraTech Cement’s manufacturing capacity in Andhra Pradesh while supporting industrial activity in Nandyal district. The plant’s energy design and stated groundwater-use policy are also intended to reduce the environmental impact of its operations. The company has identified the facility as part of its continuing capacity expansion in the Indian cement market.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Cement sales rose 9% to 4.7 MMT, while EBITDA increased 11%.

Published

on

By

Shares



Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.
The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.
On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid renewable energy project in Rajasthan. Once operational, the project is expected to generate about 100 million units of renewable electricity annually. The company expects it to reduce reliance on conventional power sources and improve long-term cost certainty across its Rajasthan operations.
Jayakumar Krishnaswamy, Managing Director, Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd., said, “Q2 FY27 was a testament to resilient execution in a challenging operating environment. Despite intense and erratic rainfall in our key markets, global and regional logistics & supply chain disruptions, and elevated input costs stemming from ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, the Company delivered strong YoY growth in Revenue, EBITDA, and PAT. Our performance reflects the strength of our strategic levers of premiumisation and geographical mix optimisation, which helped realisations amid muted cement prices.”
He added, “During the quarter, the Company achieved a significant growth milestone with the successful commissioning of the 2 MMTPA Grinding Unit at Limla, Surat, underscoring our strong project execution capabilities. This achievement reinforces our confidence in delivering the remaining modules of the Vadraj Cement Project at Kutch and Sachana within the planned timelines. Looking ahead, while we remain mindful of evolving macroeconomic and geopolitical dynamics, we remain focused on operational excellence, accelerating premiumisation, optimising supply chain efficiencies, and executing our growth projects as planned.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Meghalaya Cabinet Approves MCCL Closure, Writes Off Rs. 244.3 mn

Cabinet approves winding up of state-owned cement company

Published

on

By

Shares



The Meghalaya Cabinet has approved the closure and winding up of Meghalaya Cherra Cement (MCCL), a state-owned cement company, with pending liabilities of approximately Rs. 244.3 mn to be written off as part of the process. The decision was announced by Chief Minister Conrad K Sangma on October 13, 2026.

The approved write-off comprises about Rs. 89 mn in sales tax dues and Rs. 155.3 mn in royalty dues. The Cabinet’s decision addresses the liabilities that remained after the company’s operations and enables the government to proceed with its formal closure.

Sangma said employee dues owed by MCCL had been settled in line with the state government’s commitment. The settlement of employee-related liabilities is a key part of the winding-up process and removes outstanding obligations to the company’s workforce.

The Chief Minister explained that MCCL is owned by the government, meaning the pending liabilities would otherwise involve transfers between the state government and its departments. Writing off the dues is intended to simplify the accounting and administrative steps required to complete the closure.

The decision is also intended to ensure that the winding-up does not create an additional financial burden for the state government. With employee payments settled and the sales tax and royalty liabilities addressed through the approved write-off, the Cabinet’s approval marks a further step towards completing the formal closure of MCCL.

The action follows the state government’s decision to discontinue the company and resolve its outstanding obligations through an orderly winding-up process. The approved measures cover the principal liabilities identified for settlement and allow the government to advance the remaining formal procedures associated with closing the state-owned enterprise.

Continue Reading

Video Thumbnail
▶

    SIGN-UP FOR OUR GENERAL NEWSLETTER

    Trending News

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

     

    Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

     


      This will close in 0 seconds