Connect with us

Concrete

Future Potential Materials

Published

on

Shares

Asok Kr. Dikshit, Richa Mazumder, Sanjeev Kr. Chaturvedi and Lok Pratap Singh, National Council for Cement and Building Materials (NCCBM), discuss the themes of sustainable development in India’s cement sector, as the second piece from a three-part series.

It has been established by several researchers that different types of wastes/by-products of other industries can be utilised as alternative fuels and raw materials for cement production. Moreover, the circular economy is also supported by the production of blended cements, composite cements and utilising performance improvers (PI) (Kukreja et al. 2020). Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC) and Portland Slag Cement (PSC), which uses fly ash and granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) in the production of blended cements are not only beneficial for conservation of natural resources but also in lowering clinker factor in cement and reduction of CO2 emissions along with environmental sustainability. Moreover, various clays and LD slag are also in the lab scale R&D interfacial stage for application in the cement sector as raw materials.

Fly-ash
Fly ash is a by-product of burning pulverised coal in a coal-fuelled power plant. In particular, it is the unburned residue collected by either mechanical or electrostatic separators that is carried away from the burning zone in the boiler by the flue gases. The heavier unburned material drops to the bottom of the furnace and is termed bottom ash. Fly ash is a pozzolanic material consisting of finely-divided amorphous alumino-silicate with varying amounts of calcium. This when mixed with portland cement and water, will react with the calcium hydroxide released by the hydration of portland cement to produce various calcium-silicate hydrates (C-S-H) and calcium-aluminate hydrates. Technical assessment of fly ash is determined by physical and chemical characteristics which meet certain requirements.
The mineralogy and composition of fly ash is not constant and depends upon rather parent coal source, operating parameters and temperature of TPPs, the extent of coal preparation and cleaning, furnace design, usual climate storage and handling. The crystalline phases of the fly ash are determined by the mineralogical properties. Generally, fly ash has silica 40-60 per cent, alumina 20-40 per cent and ferrous 5–15 per cent by weight fractions (Singh et al. 2018). It mostly consists of mullite, quartz, magnetite, hematite and calcite as the common crystalline minerals (Šešlija et al. 2016). Fly ash is categorised into two classes – class F and class C, based on mineral composition and sources of coal.

Backfilling in the zinc lead mines.


In a few cement plants, fly ash is used as a raw mix component but, in most cases, fly ash is added to cement to produce Portland Pozzolana cement (PPC). Fly ash utilisation in the cement and construction industries can lower GHG emissions because such use offsets the emissions that result from mining activities and CO2 generation during cement production. Fly ash can decrease a higher percentage of the consumption of cement during construction. Out of the total fly ash generation, around 25 per cent is being utilised for cement industry (http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/others/thermal/tcd/flyash_201617.pdf). 33 per cent around still remains unutilised due to Geographical imbalanced and limitation of maximum 35 per cent fly ash, in PPC, as per IS:1489 (Part-I) (http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/others/thermal/tcd/flyash_201617.pdf).
In NCB various R&D work has been done on fly ash, some of which has been discussed below:

Evaluation of high-volume fly ash cements
The Indian standard specification IS: 1489 (Pt.I)-2015 for Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC) permits 35 per cent (max) fly ash addition in PPC. In view of enhancing the use of fly ash in PPC in order to achieve resource conservation and environmental sustainability, NCB has taken up studies on preparation and evaluation of high volume fly ash cements (HVFAC) in line with European standard EN-197-1. Different approaches have been adopted to achieve desired strength development and other physical characteristics of HVFAC using fly ash and clinker materials available in different parts of India. Investigations have been carried out on performance evaluation of High-Volume Fly Ash Cement (HVFAC) up to 50 percent fly ash prepared by inter-grinding as well as separate grinding and blending of all the constituents. A similar strength development pattern was observed in the cement samples prepared with increasing percentage of fly ash with clinkers of different alite contents and maintaining same fineness level by inter-grinding as well as separate grinding and blending (Fig 5.). The effect of fineness levels was found to be more pronounced of HVFAC prepared with the clinker having higher alite.

Development of PPC based on fly ash and limestone
In this study, Portland composite cement blends were prepared (140 nos) with four types of clinker from different regions of India along with the regional available fly ash (15-35 per cent) and limestone (5, 7 and 10 per cent). The results depicted that the clinker quality plays an important role on performance of limestone and fly ash based composite cements. The mortar studies indicated Portland composite cements based on limestone and fly ash with 35 per cent replacement of clinker by fly ash and limestone (keeping limestone content upto 7 per cent in it). Hydration studies showed Monocarboaluminate (Ca4Al2O6 • CO3 • 11H2O) was found in the samples containing FA and LS, and the intensity of these peaks tend to be stronger when the amount of limestone is increased. Draft code formulation for submission to BIS is underway.

Development cement backfills pastes (CBP) using ultra-fine fly-ash and its evaluation
NCB has taken up several projects with Hindustan Zinc Limited in cement-based backfilling material/paste development. The target is for an application of the CBP as a cost-effective alternative to existing backfilling industrial solutions. Assimilation of fly-ash-an industrial waste: generated from a thermal power station along with other wastes generated from mining industries to produce CBP having the desired requirement, as per standing regulation, not only yields financial benefits of reduced consumption of cement whereby reducing carbon footprint; also, it allows utilisation of industrial waste whereby reducing the portion of material channelled to landfills. In the title project, the utiliSation of the ultra-fine fly ash for the preparation of CBP was studied at NCB, Ballabgarh. Based on the studies, NCB made a recommendation to HZL and is under consideration by the company. The studies’ results have
effectively achieved the target and are subject to application mine backfilling at SKE mines,
Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Investigations on utilisation of coarse fly ash (200-250 m2/kg)
Generation of fly ash in India is about 226 mtpa, out of which 26 per cent is being utilised in the cement industry. BIS allows fly ash of fineness above 250 m2/kg to be utilised for cement manufacturing. This investigation was carried out in NCB to study utilisation of coarser fly ash (200-250) in cement manufacture and to establish its technical suitability Investigations were carried out with fly ashes having the fineness below the specified BIS limit (250 m2/kg). The studies depicted that the coarser fly ash samples are meeting the mandatory requirements of IS 3812:2013, after grinding to 320±10 m2/kg. Studies on field wise samples indicated that the fineness is lower than 250 m2/kg at initial fields. However, grinding of these samples to 320±10 m2/kg resulted in improved characteristics conforming to IS 3812:2013.

Improving the reactivity of fly ash
The study carried out in NCB investigates the effect of mineral matter doping in the coal before combustion on its chemico-mineralogical constituents of the resultant ash. Different types of sintering aids were mixed with coal of different percentages. The ash prepared of the designed coal and dopants mixes in laboratory furnace at around 950°C. The resultant ash with and without dopants were evaluated for their chemico-mineralogy and microstructure characterisation using state of art instruments such as XRD, SEM and Optical Microscopy The mineralogical or crystalline compositions and glass content of doped ash samples shows better characteristics than the un doped sample. The addition of sintering aids may convert the crystalline content of silicate minerals into amorphous content and enhance the total amorphous content in the doped ash samples. Lime reactivity, and cement reactivity of doped ash samples shows better performance than the control sample.

Improving the properties of fly ash at higher fineness through mechanical activation
Fly ash has been established as the most sought-after material in cement, construction, and related building materials Industry. Enhancing the fly ash utiliSation in the manufacture of cement is identified as one of the key areas to mitigate the GreenHouse Gas emissions from cement industry. Owing to the poor reactivity of Indian fly ash, the cement industry is generally using activation methods to improve the properties of fly ash for enhanced use as a blending component in cement manufacturing. Among different methods of activation, mechanical activation is the most economic and effective way for improving the fly ash properties. Grinding of fly ash alone or along with clinker to the required fineness is a common practice in cement industry. Though increasing the fly ash content in cement has economic and environmental benefits, it results in decrease in the compressive strength values particularly at early ages.

Ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)


In NCB, investigations were carried out on the mechanical activation of fly ash to the very high fineness values to see the effect of use of high fine fly ash on the properties of resultant cement. Though the physical properties and glass content values of the fly ash were found to be improving with the fineness, after a certain fineness some properties of fly ash such as lime reactivity (L.R.) and comparative compressive strength (C.C.S.) were found to be decreasing. Change in the microstructure of fly ash with increasing the fineness of fly ash was identified as the primary reason that is affecting the L.R. and C.R. values. Besides, increasing the fineness of clinker was found to be more beneficial than increasing the fineness of fly ash to absorb more fly ash in the cement manufacturing.
Blast furnace Slag is formed when iron ore, coke, and limestone or dolomite are heated at high temperatures. During this process, the limestone/dolomite acts as a flux and is chemically combined with the silicates and aluminates present in ore. Coke ash and the above products are mixed and produce blast furnace slag. This molten product can be cooled in several ways to form various types of slag, including ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), which is rapidly cooled with large quantities of water to produce granules. GGBS is mixed with Portland cement clinker to make a blended cement known as Portland slag cement. Various phases are present in the slag including glass (supercooled liquid silicates), semi-glass, quartz, Ca-rich silicates, aluminosilicates, the presence of modified C3S and C2S phases, and in melilite, gehlenite, akermanite, merwinite, rankinite, pseudo wollastonite, monticellite, anorthite, forsterite, perovskite, spinel, etc. in minor amounts (Yildirim and Prezzi 2011). Currently India produced approx. 25 million tonnes BFS out of which 22 million tonnes of BFS is granulated and being consumed entirely in cement industry (Agarwal et al. 2017).


Steel slag and Cu slags are also used in cement manufacturing. In these types of slags, the morphometric complexity in the glass is typical, and semi-glass grains may behave as mineralisers. There is a direct effect of this slag on the formation of belite grains. However, these slags reduce the size of grains of both C3S and C2S if the pyro-processing system is disturbed. Steel slag can potentially replace conventional raw materials for clinker production owing to its relatively high content of oxides, such as CaO and Fe2O3. Additionally using steel slag as the raw material helps in the conservation of natural resources. Copper slag has a high Fe content and has been used as an iron adjustment material during the cement clinker production. Since the main composition of copper slag is vitreous FeSiO3, it has low melting point and could reduce the calcination temperature for cement clinker. Thus, the use of copper slag to replace iron powder as iron adjusting materials facilitates cement production, reduces or eliminates the need of mineraliser.
Some of the studies carried out in NCB on steel slag has been discussed below:
Utilisation of Granulated LD Converter Slag
Investigations were carried out in NCB to study the utilisation of granulated LD slag in the manufacture of cement and replacement of natural sand in cement mortars. The investigations revealed that LD slag could be gainfully utilised up to 5 per cent as performance improver in cement manufacture. The results indicated that compressive strength at 28-days improved up to 3.5 per cent as compared to that of control OPC without affecting the other parameters such as water requirement, setting time and soundness. Further, LD slag up to 40 per cent by weight could be added during the clinker grinding stage to manufacture cement blends. The compressive strength was found comparable to control OPC and PSC containing granulated BF slag. The investigations on use of LD slag as raw materials up to 4.25 per cent by replacing iron bearing additives in the raw mix revealed that good quality clinker could be produced at 1400 °C. The investigations on use of LD slag as replacement of natural sand in cement mortar established that LD slag could be gainfully utilised up to 100 percent. The replacement of natural sand in cement mortar also showed improved performance characteristics.

Utilisation of ladle furnace slag as a raw mix component
Exploration studies of Ladle Furnace Slag (LDF slag), which was a waste product from the steel industry were carried out in NCB as a raw mix component in manufacture of clinker to replace the laterite/red mud. Chemical and mineralogical investigations of LDF slag showed the presence of Fe2O3 in the range of 3 to 34 per cent, Al2O3 in the range of 14 to 33 per cent, SiO2 in the range of 3 to 21 per cent and CaO in the range of 33-51 per cent and calcium silicate, calcium aluminate, iron containing minerals etc. Computed mix designs were performed to optimise the raw materials with the similar potential minerals percentage, liquid content, AM, SM in the resultant clinker. LDF slag designed optimum compositions with the replacement level of 0.5 to 1.5 of laterite/red mud showed similar characteristics in terms of burnability as well as setting time, compressive strength and other physical characteristics.

Utilisation of Pet Coke Gasification Slag
A by-product slag, provided by M/s Reliance Industries Ltd, generated during the process of gasification of pet coke was investigated in NCB for its utilisation in the manufacture of OPC. In addition to CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and MgO, the slag also contains about 4 per cent vanadium. Investigations were carried out on the use of this slag as raw mix component in manufacture of Portland clinker. The burnability of cement raw mixes designed using 1-5 per cent pet coke gasification slag showed its mineralising effect, which was manifested through better lime assimilation and development of clinker mineral phases along with microstructure. The slag sample was also investigated for its suitability as performance improver in manufacture of OPC. The glass content in the sample was found to be 54 per cent and thus did not meet the requirement of Indian standard IS: 12089-1987. The physical characteristics of resultant cement were found to be comparable to its counterpart prepared using 5 per cent BF slag at all the ages.

Red mud
It is a byproduct of the aluminium industry. It contains numerous in situ mineralisers, which help to enhance quick phase formation in the clinker. However, the phases’ forms are different in shape and size. Red mud also affects the morphology of phases, which is fragmentation of alite and belite, thereby increasing the granulometry of phases. Tsakiridis et al. (2004) by addition of red mud into the raw meals assessed the feasibility of producing Portland cement clinkers. They used raw mix composition having 3.5 per cent Bayer-process red mud blended with 74.8 per cent limestone, 11.4 per cent schist, 3 per cent bauxite and 7.3 per cent Milos sand to prepare Portland cement clinkers. This raw meal is sintered at 1450°C and the produced clinkers mixed with the gypsum (5 per cent) to form final cement. It was observed that the addition of red mud in the raw mix resulted in a well-burnt clinker with a free lime content of 1.94 per cent at 1450°C. The chemical composition of the produced clinker was close to that of OPC clinker, and the incorporation of red mud residue at 3.5 per cent did not affect the mineralogical composition of the Portland cement clinker.
Use of red mud in cement production produces significant environmental and economic benefits such as natural resource management, promoting circular economy, lowering contamination of soil and groundwater, reducing landfill volume, cutting waste disposal costs, and decreasing the production cost of cement (Liu and Zhang, 2011)

Lime Sludge
It is waste mainly produced from the paper industry, other sources are fertiliser, sugar, carbide and soda ash industries. Lime sludge (LS) is generated by a kraft process through the chemical recovery section in a paper mill. The chemical composition of LS samples contains major CaO (52-55) per cent, SiO2 (1-4) per cent, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 make up less than 1 per cent by weight. Minor alkalis of Na2O, K2O and SO3 content are less than 1 wt per cent which is permitted as per Indian standard. al. has undertaken a study in which the lime sludge addition improved the burning ability of clinker which in turn reduced the temperatures for calcium carbonate (CaCO3) decomposition and liquid phase formation (Wei et al. 2014). Raw mix designed to manufacture cement clinker by using lime sludge and other cementitious raw materials, which has C3S, C2S, C3A, C4AF as clinker phase composition (Dikshit and Sahoo 2022).

Red Mud


The industrial LS is having the potential to be utilised as feasible raw material for cement preparation by replacing the limestone. Lime sludge can be used in 30-40 per cent in place of limestone because free lime content is observed to be low in the clinkers. Mineralogically C3S and C2S content is lying in the desired range and alite belite grain size are 27-34 µm and 14-23 µm respectively. NCB has validated lime sludge waste from paper and pulp industry in the cement manufacture application, which can bring sustainable development towards the environment as well as circular economy.

Use of Jarosite
In NCB, a study on Jarosite, a residual by-product generated from zinc industry during hydrometallurgical process containing predominantly Fe2O3, SO3, alkalies with small amounts of ZnO has been carried out. The constituent oxides present are known to contribute significantly in formation of clinker mineral phases and therefore, the Jarosite could be an effective mineraliser and activator in the manufacture of OPC clinker. The present study highlights the effect of addition of 0.5-2.0 per cent of typical Jarosite in cement raw mixes prepared with different grade limestone samples along with other conventional raw materials. The clinker parameters such as LSF, SM and AM were maintained in the range of 0.92, 2.07-2.18 and 1.01-1.14 respectively. Burnability studies on raw mixes showed increase in the rate of lime assimilation and rapid formation of clinker mineral phases in presence of Jarosite. The mineral phase developments and micro-structures of laboratory clinkers fired at 1400±5°C were found to be adequate in presence of optimum dose of 1.5 per cent Jarosite and were comparable to control clinker (without Jarosite addition) prepared at 1450±5°C. The physical performance of Ordinary Portland Cement thus prepared from above mineralised clinker showed performance comparable to control cement. As the Jarosite contains heavy elements, a leaching study was carried out by immersing 28-days hardened neat cement cubes in 500 ml distilled water over a period of 24 months. The leachates such as barium, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, copper, manganese, zinc, lead and strontium were found to be in negligible amounts.

Dried Lime sludge

Use of Marble Waste
Studies were carried out in NCB on the suitability of marble dust/slurry for use in cement manufacture as raw mix, as performance improver in OPC and in making Portland Limestone Cement (PLC). Performance evaluation of Portland Limestone Cement (PLC) composites prepared by blending of 15-30 per cent marble dust/limestone with OPC showed comparable strength development. Similarly, Ordinary Portland Cement samples containing 5 per cent marble dust collected from different marble clusters of Rajasthan also showed performance comparable to OPC containing 5 per cent limestone and conforming to IS requirement of CaCO3 =75 per cent laid down for limestone to be used as performance improver in OPC.

Phosphogypsum
Phosphogypsum is generated as a by-product during the manufacture of phosphoric acid. Approximately 4.5-5.5 tonnes of phosphogypsum is generated per tonne of phosphoric acid produced using wet process. Apart from the yearly generation of phosphogypsum, there is an additional issue of legacy stock of unutilised phosphogypsum of about 64.65 mt at various fertiliser plants accumulated over the years. In the manufacturing process of cement, phosphogypsum could be used as a replacement of natural gypsum which plays the role of a set retarder. Therefore, a project was taken up in NCB on investigations on utilisation of phosphogypsum in cement manufacturing.
Phosphogypsum along with mineral gypsum and clinker from different sources were collected for this study and their chemical, mineralogical and thermal characterisations were carried out. OPC blends were prepared using phosphogypsum and evaluated for chemical and physical properties. Initial results were found to be very encouraging. Further investigation is underway.

Technical feasibility of using FGD gypsum
Globally, Flue Gas Desulfurisation (FGD) systems have been installed in many thermal power plants in developed countries and FGD plants have been in operation in the US for 40 years. In India also the standards set by the MoEFandCC for coal-based thermal power plants came into force by which FGD systems need to be installed in them. Accordingly, a R&D project on technical feasibility of using FGD gypsum in cement manufacture is taken up in NCB. In this project, FGD gypsum is obtained from thermal power plants and other raw materials from cement plants. The FGD is characterised for their chemico-mineralogical properties. Mineralogical characterisation has been done by XRD and DTA. It clearly shows the presence of the Gypsum. The differential thermal analysis (DTA) indicates two endothermic peaks at 140°C due to the conversion of dihydrate to hemihydrate and a small hump at around 167°C due to conversion of hemihydrate to anhydrite of gypsum. In addition, an exothermic peak was recorded at 481°C, corresponding to the phase transformation of a CaSO4 to ? CaSO4. Chemical properties of Cement with both mineral and FGD gypsum clearly shows identical properties as per Indian Standards. The physical properties of cement Cement with both mineral and FGD gypsum clearly show comparable properties for all the properties, including normal consistency, setting time, and soundness. Furthermore, the compressive strength (CS) at 1D, 3D, 7D and 28 days for all samples with FGD gypsum shows similar performance compared to the control sample with mineral gypsum.

*The Authors wish to acknowledge the Director General of National Council for Cement and Building Materials (NCB) for giving permission for publication and DPIIT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, GOI, through various R&D projects support financial
for sustainable development of cement Industry. The Authors also acknowledge all scientific and technical staff of NCB for cooperation through R&D work for sustainability of cement industry related projects.

**List of references will be featured in the concluding part of the series.

Concrete

CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech

To build capacity of 100,000 tonnes a year

Published

on

By

Shares



CarbonStrong has raised Rs 125 million (125 mn) to scale a low carbon cement technology and build commercial production capacity. The startup was founded in 2022 by Harsh Jain and Vikramaditya Singh and has moved from customer trials to plans for industrial supply. The company said its material replaces up to 50 per cent of cement in concrete while reducing costs and improving durability.

CarbonStrong states the product is around 30 per cent cheaper than cement and compatible with existing concrete plants, reducing the need for new equipment and operational disruption. Trials and paid pilots have been conducted in Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Chennai with demonstration projects involving ready-mix firms and precast manufacturers. Compatibility with current workflows forms a central part of the commercial strategy, aiming to ease adoption by builders and contractors.

The funding will support construction of a facility with capacity of up to 100,000 tonnes (100,000 t) a year over the next two years to supply early customers commercially. The firm is also developing materials from steel slag, copper slag and mine tailings to expand its feedstock base, while noting the technical challenge of homogenising different waste streams. Recognition by HCL ClimaForce in 2026 and by the Avaana-Startup India-NITI Aayog AIM Grand Challenge in 2025 has underscored progress.

Industry adoption remains the principal test and will require consistent material performance, supply reliability and competitive economics. CarbonStrong projects the Indian market for cement substitutes could reach Rs 250 billion (250 bn) by 2030 and has set an ambition to produce 10 million tonnes a year by 2035 (10 mn t), a target far above its near term capacity. Moving from pilots to production demands capital, manufacturing discipline and customers willing to specify the material beyond demonstrations. The recent Rs 125 million raise is intended to fund the next phase of scale and to demonstrate that industrial waste can become a dependable input for lower carbon construction.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Protect Your Margins

Published

on

By

Shares

In a research-backed article, Dr SB Hegde examines why carbon-adjusted profitability and LC3 will decide the next set of winners in cement manufacturing.

The Indian cement industry has achieved world-class operational efficiency through lower specific energy consumption, high plant utilisation and a reduced average clinker factor of approximately 67.5 per cent. These traditional measures of operational excellence remain essential. However, they are no longer sufficient. Carbon now carries a measurable financial cost under India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) and under European carbon markets. Future leadership will be defined by carbon-adjusted profitability, the ability to generate strong returns while systematically lowering the carbon intensity of every ton sold.
Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) offers a practical, scalable pathway to achieve this dual objective. By replacing up to 50 per cent of clinker with calcined clay and limestone, LC3 can reduce CO2 emissions by 30–40 per cent while delivering comparable or superior durability performance.
This article examines the technical foundations of LC3, European industrial practices, the emerging Indian carbon market and a concrete roadmap for Indian companies to embed carbon-adjusted metrics and LC3 into daily operations, incentives and commercial strategy.

Limits of traditional operational excellence
For many years, plant performance has been judged primarily by five indicators: specific heat consumption, specific power consumption, kiln and mill utilisation, clinker factor and overall equipment effectiveness. These metrics drove continuous improvement and helped the industry reduce energy use and increase the share of blended cement. Three structural changes have rendered them incomplete as sole measures of success.
First, carbon now carries a real or opportunity cost. Plants that improve volume or lower cash cost while raising or stagnating emissions intensity create a hidden liability that will surface as CCTS trading matures and as green procurement expands.
Second, lower-carbon products such as LC3 and high-performance blended cements are creating differentiated market segments. Customers in infrastructure, real estate and export-oriented construction are beginning to specify embodied-carbon limits.
Third, investors and lenders increasingly treat carbon intensity as a financial risk factor. Traditional KPIs can mask the divergence between short-term cash profit and long-term carbon-adjusted value.

What is carbon-adjusted profitability?
Carbon-adjusted profitability evaluates normal profit after explicit adjustment for carbon performance. A practical expression is:
Carbon-Adjusted EBITDA = Conventional EBITDA – Carbon Cost + Green Premium Income
Carbon cost may be an internal carbon price, the actual cost of purchasing Carbon Credit Certificates under CCTS, or the opportunity cost of high emissions relative to peers. Green premium income arises when customers pay more for verified lower-carbon cement or when the company sells surplus credits. Tracking both conventional and carbon-adjusted profit side-by-side gives management a clearer picture of value creation under evolving market rules.

Table 1. Traditional KPIs versus Carbon-Adjusted Leadership Metrics
Traditional Focus New Leadership Metric Why It Matters
Specific energy consumption Emissions intensity (kg CO2/t cement) Directly linked to future CCTS and CBAM costs
Kiln utilisation Carbon-adjusted contribution margin Reveals true value of incremental volume
Clinker factor Share of lower-carbon products sold (incl. LC3) Measures commercial success of the transition
Power cost per tonne Effective carbon cost per tonne sold Expose hidden liabilities
Absolute EBITDA Carbon-adjusted EBITDA + green premium Aligning profit with future market reality

LC3: Technical foundations and performance advantages
LC3 is a ternary blended cement that typically combines approximately 50 per cent clinker, 30 per cent calcined clay, 15 per cent limestone and 5 per cent gypsum (the classic LC3-50 formulation). The decisive technical advantage is that clay is calcined at 700–850 °C, far below the 1,450 °C required for clinker production. This lower temperature, together with the substantial reduction in clinker content, delivers CO2 reductions of 30–40 per cent relative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC).
Chemistry is synergistic. Calcined kaolinitic clay (metakaolin) reacts with calcium hydroxide from clinker hydration and with limestone to form additional C-A-S-H gel and carboaluminate phases. These phases densify the microstructure, reduce porosity and improve durability.
Field experience shows superior resistance to chloride ingress, sulphate attack and alkali–silica reaction. Early-age strength can match OPC with high-reactivity clays; later-age strengths routinely meet 42.5 and 52.5 grade requirements.
Importantly, LC3 does not require high-purity kaolin. Clays with 40 per cent or even lower kaolinite content can be activated successfully, expanding raw-material availability across India. Calcination can use adapted rotary kilns or dedicated flash calciners, making the technology compatible with existing plant infrastructure and far less capital-intensive than carbon capture.
Economic analyses show that LC3 can be produced at equal or lower cost than OPC in many locations because of reduced energy demand and cheaper clay. Life-cycle assessments consistently report 30–40 per cent lower embodied CO2 per tonne of cement.
Table 2. Comparative profile: OPC versus LC3-50
Parameter OPC LC3-50
Typical clinker content ~95 per cent ~50 per cent
CO2 emissions (relative) Baseline (≈0.85 t CO2/t cement process + fuel) 30–40 per cent lower
Clay calcination temperature Not applicable 700–850 °C
Key hydration products C-S-H, portlandite, ettringite C-A-S-H + carboaluminates
Chloride & sulphate resistance Good Superior
Production cost potential Baseline Equal or lower in most locations
Infrastructure compatibility Existing High (minor adaptations)

In India, commercial adoption has begun in earnest. JK Cement commenced the first commercial production of LC3 in the Indian subcontinent at its Mangrol plant in Rajasthan in 2025 under BIS standard IS 18189.
By early 2026, approximately 2,000 tonnes had been produced and sold, avoiding an estimated 500 tonnes of CO2. JK Lakshmi Cement followed with commercial launch of its Green PRO LC3 grade from the Jaykaypuram plant. As of mid-2026, two producers are supplying LC3 to the market. The first large-scale infrastructure application is the Noida International Airport (Jewar), where LC3 was used in the runway and a building complex, demonstrating full constructability and performance under demanding conditions. These early volumes are still small relative to national cement demand, but they mark the critical transition from pilot to commercial reality. Companies that scale capacity now will be positioned to capture both CCTS credits and emerging green-procurement demand.

Why the shift is accelerating
According to the World Bank’s State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026, direct carbon pricing now covers nearly 30 per cent of global greenhouse-gas emissions and generated more than US$107 billion in public revenue in 2025. The average global carbon price stands at approximately US$21 per tonne, although regional prices vary widely.
In Europe, the EU ETS price has traded near €80–85 per tonen in mid-2026. Free allocation for cement is being withdrawn in parallel with CBAM. European producers therefore face a clear signal: every tonne of avoided CO2 improves both compliance and competitiveness. Holcim has scaled calcined-clay production, including Europe’s first dedicated line at Saint-Pierre-la-Cour (France) and a second line in the Czech Republic (2026). Heidelberg Materials, Cementir (FUTURECEM) and others have commercialised low-clinker calcined-clay blends across multiple markets, showing that carbon-adjusted profitability is already reshaping capital allocation in the world’s most mature carbon market.India’s CCTS is now operational. Binding emission intensity targets apply to 186 cement facilities for FY 2025–26 and FY 2026–27. Average required reductions for integrated plants are modest (around 2.7 per cent by FY 2027), yet the direction is clear.
Trading of Carbon Credit Certificates is expected in the second half of 2026, with early prices likely in the `800–1,500 per tonne range. Plants that outperform targets can sell credits; those that underperform must buy them or face compensation. Cement is well positioned to be a net supplier of credits if clinker factor continues to fall through LC3 and other low-clinker systems.

Way forward for India
India starts from a strong baseline, world-class energy efficiency and a clinker factor already lower than the global average. The next competitive frontier is the deliberate reduction of process emissions through clinker substitution at scale. LC3 is uniquely suited to Indian conditions because suitable clays are widely distributed, the technology fits existing kiln and grinding infrastructure, and the resulting product can meet the performance demands of both infrastructure and building construction.
A practical national pathway contains five interlocking elements:

  1. Standards and acceptance: Accelerated finalisation and promotion of BIS specifications for calcined-clay and limestone–calcined-clay cements will remove a key barrier to commercial uptake. Alignment with European practice (EN 197-5) can facilitate knowledge transfer and export readiness.
  2. Supply-chain development: Investment in flash calcination capacity and systematic characterisation of regional clay deposits will secure reliable, low-cost feedstock. Existing rotary kilns can be adapted for initial volumes while dedicated calciners are built.
  3. Incentive alignment: Part of variable compensation for plant managers, sales teams and senior leadership should be linked to emissions intensity reduction and to the volume of lower-carbon products (including LC3) sold. Without this link, traditional volume and cost targets will continue to dominate behaviour.
  4. Product-level carbon accounting: Reliable measurement of emissions intensity at the individual cement grade level, supported by third-party verification where required, is essential for both CCTS compliance and credible green claims.
  5. Demand-side pull: Green public procurement policies that specify maximum embodied-carbon thresholds for major infrastructure projects will create a predictable market for LC3 and other low-carbon cements, accelerating scale and cost reduction.
    Companies that treat LC3 as a strategic product line rather than a niche offering will be better positioned to generate surplus Carbon Credit Certificates, capture any emerging green premium, and protect margins as carbon costs rise.

Organisational changes required
Technical capability alone is insufficient. Three organisational shifts are required.
Daily management: Emissions intensity must appear on the same daily and monthly dashboards as heat consumption, power consumption and utilization. Plant reviews should examine both conventional and carbon-adjusted results.
Incentives: A meaningful portion of bonuses for plant heads, technical teams and sales leadership should be tied to lower emissions intensity and successful commercialisation of LC3 and other low-carbon grades.
Commercial approach: Sales teams need clear volume and pricing targets for lower-carbon products, supported by technical service that helps customers specify and place the material correctly. Without commercial pull, excellent technical performance remains under-utilised.

Table 3. Three-stage roadmap to carbon-adjusted profitability
Time Horizon Priority Actions Expected Outcome
Next 12 months Add emissions intensity to plant dashboards; establish internal carbon price; initiate LC3 pilot production and customer trials Visibility and early organisational learning
12–24 months Revise incentive systems; scale LC3 and other low-carbon grades to key accounts; secure third-party verification capability People and sales aligned with carbon goals
24–36 months Embed carbon-adjusted metrics in board reporting and capital allocation; expand calcined-clay capacity Full system integration and competitive advantage

Questions senior leaders should ask
Boards can accelerate the transition by insisting on answers to a short list of questions:
• Is our carbon-adjusted profit improving, stable or declining relative to conventional EBITDA?
• Did recent volume growth improve or worsen our emissions intensity?
• What share of sales already comes from lower-carbon products, including LC3, and what is the trajectory?
• How exposed is our capital expenditure plan to rising carbon costs under CCTS and potential CBAM-related requirements?
• Do our incentive systems still reward only volume and cost, or have they been updated to include carbon performance?
Treating carbon with the same seriousness as energy cost or kiln utilization does not diminish operational excellence; it expands the definition of excellence to match the new competitive reality.

Looking ahead
By 2030 the gap between leading and lagging cement companies will not be decided by who records the lowest specific heat consumption. It will be decided by who delivers the strongest carbon-adjusted profits.
Absolute emissions may still rise as national production grows. That is not the issue. Companies that reduce intensity year after year and successfully sell cleaner products will pull ahead in both domestic and export markets. Those that do not will fall behind, even if their traditional efficiency numbers look strong.
Operational excellence built the Indian cement industry. It remains the foundation. It is no longer the complete picture. Carbon-adjusted profitability is the clearer measure of success.
LC3 is not a distant technology. It is available now. It cuts CO3 by 30–40 per cent, works with existing plants, and is already in commercial production in India. Companies that treat it as a strategic product, not a pilot, will protect their margins and generate tradable credits.
Leaders who act now will place carbon metrics on daily dashboards, link incentives to intensity reduction and LC3 sales, invest in calcined-clay capacity, and build commercial capability to sell lower-carbon products. They will shape the next chapter of the industry.

References

  1. World Bank. (2026). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
  2. International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). (2026). India Carbon Credit Trading Scheme – Status and Coverage. Berlin: ICAP.
  3. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Bureau of Energy Efficiency. (2025). Greenhouse Gases Emission Intensity Target Rules, 2025. New Delhi: Government of India.
  4. Scrivener, K., Martirena, F., Bishnoi, S., & Maity, S. (2018). Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 49–56.
  5. RMI. (2024). The Business Case for LC3. Rocky Mountain Institute.
  6. European Commission. (2026). EU Emissions Trading System – Allowance Price Data and Free Allocation Phase-out Schedule. Brussels.
  7. Holcim. (2025–2026). Scaling Calcined Clay for Sustainable Building – Corporate Updates on European and Latin American Capacity. Zurich: Holcim Ltd.
  8. LC3 Project / EPFL. (2026). LC3 – A Guide to Best Practices for Scalable, Affordable and Sustainable Low-Carbon Building. Lausanne: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
  9. Business Today / Industry Reports. (2026). First Large-Scale LC3 Application at Noida International Airport, Jewar. New Delhi.
  10. NITI Aayog / Industry Analyses. (2026). Roadmap and Baseline Performance Indicators for the Indian Cement Sector. New Delhi.
  11. Springer / Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. (2026). LC3 Systems: A Review of Chemistry, Performance, Durability and Sustainability toward Market Adoption.
  12. Cementir Holding / Industry Sources. (2025–2026). FUTURECEM and Related Low-Clinker Technologies in Europe.
  13. Climate Risk Horizons & Independent Analyses. (2026). Assessment of Emission Intensity Targets under India’s CCTS for Cement and Other Hard-to-Abate Sectors.
  14. GCCA / TERI. (Various years). Decarbonization Roadmaps for the Indian Cement Industry.
  15. EN 197-5:2021. Cement – Part 5: Portland-composite cement CEM II/C-M and Composite cement CEM VI. European Committee for Standardization.

Continue Reading

Concrete

More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe

Published

on

By

Shares

Dijam Panigrahi makes a counterintuitive but data-backed argument that routing every sensor alert through human approval does not make cement plants safer.

India’s cement industry has spent the last two years wiring kilns, mills and coolers with sensors and automated control systems, and the safety case for doing so is strong on paper. Contract workers still make up the majority of the industry’s workforce, and fatal accidents remain a recurring problem. The Indian National Cement Workers Federation has noted that around 83 per cent of workers in the sector hold precarious positions, a fact that resurfaced after an oxygen cylinder explosion killed three contract workers at a plant in Chhattisgarh.
Industry tallies compiled by IndustriALL found cement plants recorded at least seventeen accidents in one year with 21 workers killed, and ten accidents the following year with nine killed, most of them contract staff. Automated monitoring, in theory, closes that gap. A sensor never gets complacent and never skips a check because a shift is short staffed.
However, plants that respond by routing every anomaly reading to a person for approval are quietly building a system that fails the same way understaffing does. When operators receive dozens of flagged deviations a shift, most of them minor, they learn a simple lesson: the fastest way through the queue is to approve without reading closely. The safety benefit disappears, not because the technology failed, but because the humans supervising it adapted to the volume.

Why alerts get ignored
A study cited by manufacturing technology publisher Applied SmartFactory found more than 95 per cent of alarms in a semiconductor fab were low priority, and only about 4 per cent ever triggered an action, with just 100 out of 5,000 alarms accounting for 70 per cent of all alarm activity. The mechanism is the same whether the trigger is a vibration sensor or an AI model flagging a kiln temperature swing. Once the ratio of noise to signal crosses a threshold, workers stop treating the system as a decision aid and start treating it as a formality to clear.
The scale of AI deployment underway makes this more than a theoretical risk. Stanford’s 2026 AI Index Report found organisational adoption of AI has reached 88 per cent, even as documented AI incidents rose to 362 in 2025, up sharply from 233 the year before, according to analysis of the report. The Index also found only about a third of organisations have adopted a formal governance framework, with NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework cited by 33 per cent and ISO/IEC 42001 cited by 36 per cent.
Most manufacturers are deploying monitoring systems faster than they are building the judgment for when a flagged event actually needs a person’s attention. In India, plants run by JK Cement have begun pairing CCTV feeds with AI to define safe zones around heavy machinery, a promising direction that still depends on operators trusting and reading the alerts the system generates.

A three-tier model for cement plant
The fix is not less monitoring or more monitoring. It is classifying decisions by risk and by novelty, rather than treating human oversight as a single switch that is either on or off. A workable model sorts factory floor events into three tiers.
The first tier, proceed, covers deviations the plant has seen before that fall within known safe bounds, such as a kiln feed rate adjustment within an established range. These should run without a stop for approval, because routing them to a person only trains that person to click through.
The second tier, pause, covers events that are unusual but not yet dangerous, such as a vibration reading trending toward a limit or a fuel blend shifting outside its typical mix. These warrant a brief human check before the system proceeds, giving an operator the chance to apply judgment the model does not yet have.
The third tier, escalate, covers events that are both high risk and unfamiliar, such as a pressure reading combined with a temperature spike that has no close precedent in the plant’s history. These should stop the process entirely and require a decision from someone with the authority to shut down a line.

Who should set the threshold
Where these tiers get drawn matters as much as the framework itself. Threshold setting is frequently handed to the vendor supplying the monitoring software or to a plant’s IT department, both of which understand the technology but not the specific tolerances of a given kiln, mill or line. Operations staff, who know that a particular grinding unit runs hotter under monsoon humidity or that a calciner behaves differently after a refractory reline, are better positioned to calibrate what counts as routine on their own equipment.
Handing threshold ownership to operations does not remove IT or vendors from the process, but it puts the calibration decision closest to the people who live with its consequences on the floor.

Signals that oversight is actually working
A few concrete indicators reveal whether a monitoring setup is functioning as intended or simply providing the appearance of safety. The escalation rate over time is the first: a rate that stays flat or climbs slowly as operations mature is healthy, while one that spikes and then falls sharply often means operators have started overriding the system rather than engaging with it. Time to resolution is the second: escalations that take progressively longer to close suggest fatigue or confusion about ownership, not diligence. The third, and most telling, is how accurate the system’s own uncertainty estimates turn out to be, meaning whether events flagged as high risk actually correlated with real incidents, and whether events waved through stayed incident free. A system whose escalations do not track with actual outcomes trains operators toward the same complacency that unmonitored equipment produces.
None of this argues against automation in Indian cement manufacturing, where a labor structure built on contract work and a track record of serious accidents make better monitoring an urgent need. It argues for treating human oversight as a design problem with three distinct settings, rather than a single
dial turned up whenever a plant wants to look safer on paper.

About the author:
Dijam Panigrahi, Co-founder and COO, GridRaster, is a spatial computing platform for industrial enterprises and manufacturers.

Continue Reading

Video Thumbnail

    SIGN-UP FOR OUR GENERAL NEWSLETTER


    Trending News