Connect with us

Concrete

Green Cements and Potential Challenges

Published

on

Shares

Dr SB Hegde, Professor, Jain University, Karnataka State, India, and Visiting Professor, Pennsylvania State University, USA, discusses the varieties of eco-friendly cements and their key components while evaluating the difficulties in manufacturing them.

Today, cement is the commodity item that is used most widely, and each person uses about half a tonne of cement annually.
Cement, however, has a significant negative impact on the environment despite the important role it plays in society. Currently, the production of cement consumes 3 per cent of the energy used worldwide and contributes to 4.5 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and as the demand for cement rises, so does its impact on climate change.
For the world to achieve its goal of keeping global warming to 1.5°C in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change, it is imperative to find ways to reduce emissions from the cement sector, but this industry has proven to be obstinately challenging to decarbonise. Today, a crucial chemical process known as calcination is responsible for between fifty percent and two thirds of all emissions from cement manufacturing. Escaping these emissions is challenging.
In order to bring the cement industry to comply with the Paris Climate Agreement, annual emissions must decrease by at least 16 per cent by 2030. This implies that efforts along the entire value chain, from demand management to increasing process efficiency to utilising cutting-edge technologies and solutions in the manufacture of cement and concrete, will be crucial. However, directly addressing the process emissions will have the biggest impact.

It is anticipated that using CCUS technology to decarbonise the cement industry will increase costs by more than $100 per tonne of cement

Types of Main Green or Low Carbon Cements
Green cement is a product that is friendly to the environment and reduces the carbon footprint of cement production. A variety of green cement types have been created after numerous attempts to produce green cements.
The majority of these are based on technological developments, such as new cement formulations, geopolymers, carbon-negative cements, and new concrete products. These include energy-efficient, low carbon production techniques. Additionally, the production of green cement reduces the consumption of cement, and its primary raw materials include fly ash and blast furnace slag, industrial waste.
Examples of green cement include Ekkomaxx cement, magnesium oxychloride cement, geopolymer cement, ferrocrete, calcium sulfoaluminate cement and sequestrated carbon cement. While some of these products have been commercialised and used in numerous projects, some of these cements have not yet been widely used in construction projects despite having significant potential.

Ekkomaxx Cement
It is a kind of green cement made by the American company Ceratech, and it contains 5 per cent liquid renewable additives and 95 per cent fly ash. This cement, made by Ceratech Company, has almost no carbon footprint based on standards like the International Code Council and United States Green Building Council.
Along with a 95 per cent reduction in the use of virgin materials, the process of making cement also requires 50 per cent less water.
High early strength, resilience, crack resistance, low chloride permeability, resistance to sulphate attack, durability and corrosion resistance that is more than three times that of conventional cement, and greater resistance to freezing and thawing than that of standard cement are the main characteristics of Ekkomax cement.

Ferrocrete Cement
By combining silica and iron, which are leftover byproducts from the steel and glass industries, ferrocrete cement is created. This material mixture is then CO2-cured, potentially resulting in the creation of carbon-negative material. Ferrocrete was created by researchers at the Pennsylvania State University, USA.

Sequestrated Carbon Cement
The Calera Corp. cement in California produced cement from seawater or brine mixed with CO2 that may be used as a Portland cement substitute. In this cement production process, CO2 rich gases are filtered through seawater.
In order to create cement that can be used in place of Portland cement, the Calera Corp. cement plant in California mixed brine or seawater with CO2. Seawater is used to filter CO2 rich gases used in the cement manufacturing process.

Cement Produced with Superheated Steam
The process of superheated steam can be used to change the cement particles in order to make them more reactive. In this process, the emitted CO2 can be captured after it has been separated.

Magnesium oxychloride Cement (MOC)
Magnesium oxide (MgO) powder and a concentrated solution of magnesium chloride are the two main components of magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC), environmentally friendly and carbon-neutral cement (MgC12). These are byproducts of the mining of magnesium.
The MOC has great compressive strength and sets quickly and MgO absorbs CO2 from the atmosphere, but water can reduce its strength considerably. However, this weakness of MOC can be tackled to certain extent by introducing 15 per cent of fly ash and the same amount of silica fume.
These additives fill the pore structure in MOC, which makes the concrete denser. Consequently, both strength and durability of concrete is improved considerably. Furthermore, it is required to add phosphoric acid and soluble phosphates to improve the resistance of this type of green cement against warm water.
This cement causes steel to corrode – it cannot be used to build reinforced concrete structures unless this issue is resolved.

Geopolymer Cement
Alkali-activated cement, also known as geopolymer, is made from aluminosilicates rather than the more environmentally hazardous calcium oxide.
The aluminosilicates are made from by-products of industry, such as fly ash. The performance and price of the geopolymer cement are comparable to those of regular Portland cement, and it emits 95 per cent less CO2 overall.

Potential Challenges
Technology for carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) offers one potential answer to these challenging process emissions. In CCUS, CO2 is extracted from cement manufacturing facilities’ exhaust gases and either used as a raw material for the production of valuable chemicals and fuels or stored deep underground in geological formations. Up to 90 per cent of all emissions from cement manufacturing could be eliminated by CCUS. However, there are a number of significant obstacles to overcome before the technology can be scaled up to meet sector demands. The challenges are as follows:

Clinkerisation is the most carbon intensive process in cement making and manufacturers are targeting this process mainly for carbon reduction.

A. CO2 Content
Compared to other industrial processes targeted by CCUS, cement production emits flue gas with a CO2 concentration of less than 20 per cent. Because of this, CO2 capture from cement plants is expensive. The efficiency and economics of the capture process could be improved with the use of creative kiln designs that separate exhaust gases, but doing so would require significant investment and plant redesign.

B. Geographic Limitations
Plants must be located close to an appropriate geological formation for carbon storage, which is neither common nor evenly distributed throughout the world. The cost of storing and transporting the captured CO2 in conjunction with a low-value product like cement poses a significant obstacle to the widespread use of this technology.

C. Capital Expenditure
The deployment of CCUS technology at scale is still a long way off and remains an expensive option. Although it is possible to capture cement plant emissions for about $100 per tonne of CO2, the costs are still higher than for other hard-to-abate industries like steel and fertiliser production.

D. Influence the Customers
It is anticipated that using CCUS technology to decarbonise the cement industry will increase costs by more than $100 per tonne of cement. This entails increasing the cost of cement from its current average of about $ 80-90 120 per tonne by a factor of two and consequently raising the cost of concrete by a factor of about 30 per cent. In a market where prices are so sensitive, this is a significant barrier.
Although CCUS technology is well-positioned to contribute to the decarbonisation of the cement industry, these difficulties make it unlikely that it will solve all problems and difficulties.

Low-Carbon or Green Cement – The Real Solution
Low-carbon cement can reduce process emissions by 10 to 100 per cent when compared to conventional ordinary Portland cement (OPC), which emits 0.6 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per tonne of cement and contains more than 90 per cent clinker. The most energy- and carbon-intensive step in the cement manufacturing process, the ‘clinker’, is directly targeted by low-carbon cement in order to reduce carbon emissions. There are numerous approaches to accomplish this, including:

Green cement is a product that is friendly to the environment and reduces the carbon footprint of cement production.

  • Reducing the amount of clinker used in cement by substituting a portion of it with alternatives called supplementary cementitious materials, or SCMs
  • Readjusting the way clinker is made by reducing the amount of limestone in feedstocks or modifying the calcination process
  • Reformulating cement chemistries by developing new binders based on novel materials and low-carbon processes.

Supply-Side Restrictions Stranded Resources
It costs between $200 million and $300 million to build a plant that can produce one million tonnes of ordinary Portland cement, the most widely used type of cement. Since there are currently more than 2,000 cement kilns in use, the industry is very resistant to any solution that calls for a redesign of manufacturing facilities.

Raw Material Availability
Cement is a low-value product that is consumed in enormous quantities, so the raw inputs need to be cheap, reliable and plentiful.

Efficiency of carbon capture process can be Improved with creative kiln designs.

Sales-Marketing Barriers Customer Unrest
Because safety is typically the top priority for engineers, architects and contractors, they prefer to use a reliable and well-known product. Low-carbon cements could differ from conventional OPC in terms of their setting times or early strength. This may lead to the perception that these products are risky, expensive or challenging to use.

Broken Value Chain
Numerous players participate in the construction industry at various stages of the project. This further discourages the use of alternative products by reinforcing the desire to use standardised, predictable and consistent products.

Testing Standards
Current testing standards for cements and concrete are highly prescriptive, often dictating the exact composition required for specific applications. These standards have been designed for OPC and may not be suitable for assessing the true performance of cements based on new chemistries. Setting new standards can take decades, and adoption by customers can be even slower.

Way Forward for Low Carbon or Green Cement
Low-carbon cements are a crucial way to significantly reduce emissions from cement production, despite these legitimate worries. Although there has never been a market for low-carbon cements, large corporations, government organisations, and real estate developers are all demanding solutions to lower the carbon footprints of their infrastructure and buildings, which is mandating pilot scale studies and venture capital interest in this field.

Conclusion
The potential of low-carbon cement cannot be made successful by only cement and concrete manufactures alone. Scaling innovation will require support from and collaboration among a diverse set of people like, cement manufacturers, builders, government and investors, whose input will be crucial at different stages of this project.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Dr S B Hegde is a Professor at Jain University, Karnataka, India and also a Visiting Professor of Pennsylvania State University, United States of America. He had occupied ‘Leadership Positions’ in major and top cement companies in India and overseas. He has published more than 150 research papers in national and international journals. Dr Hegde is a recipient of the ‘Global Visionary’ Award in 2020.

Concrete

Refractory demands in our kiln have changed

Published

on

By

Shares

Radha Singh, Senior Manager (P&Q), Shree Digvijay Cement, points out why performance, predictability and life-cycle value now matter more than routine replacement in cement kilns.

As Indian cement plants push for higher throughput, increased alternative fuel usage and tighter shutdown cycles, refractory performance in kilns and pyro-processing systems is under growing pressure. In this interview, Radha Singh, Senior Manager (P&Q), Shree Digvijay Cement, shares how refractory demands have evolved on the ground and how smarter digital monitoring is improving kiln stability, uptime and clinker quality.

How have refractory demands changed in your kiln and pyro-processing line over the last five years?
Over the last five years, refractory demands in our kiln and pyro line have changed. Earlier, the focus was mostly on standard grades and routine shutdown-based replacement. But now, because of higher production loads, more alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR) usage and greater temperature variation, the expectation from refractory has increased.
In our own case, the current kiln refractory has already completed around 1.5 years, which itself shows how much more we now rely on materials that can handle thermal shock, alkali attack and coating fluctuations. We have moved towards more stable, high-performance linings so that we don’t have to enter the kiln frequently for repairs.
Overall, the shift has been from just ‘installation and run’ to selecting refractories that give longer life, better coating behaviour and more predictable performance under tougher operating conditions.

What are the biggest refractory challenges in the preheater, calciner and cooler zones?
• Preheater: Coating instability, chloride/sulphur cycles and brick erosion.
• Calciner: AFR firing, thermal shock and alkali infiltration.
• Cooler: Severe abrasion, red-river formation and mechanical stress on linings.
Overall, the biggest challenge is maintaining lining stability under highly variable operating conditions.

How do you evaluate and select refractory partners for long-term performance?
In real plant conditions, we don’t select a refractory partner just by looking at price. First, we see their past performance in similar kilns and whether their material has actually survived our operating conditions. We also check how strong their technical support is during shutdowns, because installation quality matters as much as the material itself.
Another key point is how quickly they respond during breakdowns or hot spots. A good partner should be available on short notice. We also look at their failure analysis capability, whether they can explain why a lining failed and suggest improvements.
On top of this, we review the life they delivered in the last few campaigns, their supply reliability and their willingness to offer plant-specific custom solutions instead of generic grades. Only a partner who supports us throughout the life cycle, which includes selection, installation, monitoring and post-failure analysis, fits our long-term requirement.

Can you share a recent example where better refractory selection improved uptime or clinker quality?
Recently, we upgraded to a high-abrasion basic brick at the kiln outlet. Earlier we had frequent chipping and coating loss. With the new lining, thermal stability improved and the coating became much more stable. As a result, our shutdown interval increased and clinker quality remained more consistent. It had a direct impact on our uptime.

How is increased AFR use affecting refractory behaviour?
Increased AFR use is definitely putting more stress on the refractory. The biggest issue we see daily is the rise in chlorine, alkalis and volatiles, which directly attack the lining, especially in the calciner and kiln inlet. AFR firing is also not as stable as conventional fuel, so we face frequent temperature fluctuations, which cause more thermal shock and small cracks in the lining.
Another real problem is coating instability. Some days the coating builds too fast, other days it suddenly drops, and both conditions impact refractory life. We also notice more dust circulation and buildup inside the calciner whenever the AFR mix changes, which again increases erosion.
Because of these practical issues, we have started relying more on alkali-resistant, low-porosity and better thermal shock–resistant materials to handle the additional stress coming from AFR.

What role does digital monitoring or thermal profiling play in your refractory strategy?
Digital tools like kiln shell scanners, IR imaging and thermal profiling help us detect weakening areas much earlier. This reduces unplanned shutdowns, helps identify hotspots accurately and allows us to replace only the critical sections. Overall, our maintenance has shifted from reactive to predictive, improving lining life significantly.

How do you balance cost, durability and installation speed during refractory shutdowns?
We focus on three points:
• Material quality that suits our thermal profile and chemistry.
• Installation speed, in fast turnarounds, we prefer monolithic.
• Life-cycle cost—the cheapest material is not the most economical. We look at durability, future downtime and total cost of ownership.
This balance ensures reliable performance without unnecessary expenditure.

What refractory or pyro-processing innovations could transform Indian cement operations?
Some promising developments include:
• High-performance, low-porosity and nano-bonded refractories
• Precast modular linings to drastically reduce shutdown time
• AI-driven kiln thermal analytics
• Advanced coating management solutions
• More AFR-compatible refractory mixes

These innovations can significantly improve kiln stability, efficiency and maintenance planning across the industry.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Digital supply chain visibility is critical

Published

on

By

Shares

MSR Kali Prasad, Chief Digital and Information Officer, Shree Cement, discusses how data, discipline and scale are turning Industry 4.0 into everyday business reality.

Over the past five years, digitalisation in Indian cement manufacturing has moved decisively beyond experimentation. Today, it is a strategic lever for cost control, operational resilience and sustainability. In this interview, MSR Kali Prasad, Chief Digital and Information Officer, Shree Cement, explains how integrated digital foundations, advanced analytics and real-time visibility are helping deliver measurable business outcomes.

How has digitalisation moved from pilot projects to core strategy in Indian cement manufacturing over the past five years?
Digitalisation in Indian cement has evolved from isolated pilot initiatives into a core business strategy because outcomes are now measurable, repeatable and scalable. The key shift has been the move away from standalone solutions toward an integrated digital foundation built on standardised processes, governed data and enterprise platforms that can be deployed consistently across plants and functions.
At Shree Cement, this transition has been very pragmatic. The early phase focused on visibility through dashboards, reporting, and digitisation of critical workflows. Over time, this has progressed into enterprise-level analytics and decision support across manufacturing and the supply chain,
with clear outcomes in cost optimisation, margin protection and revenue improvement through enhanced customer experience.
Equally important, digital is no longer the responsibility of a single function. It is embedded into day-to-day operations across planning, production, maintenance, despatch and customer servicing, supported by enterprise systems, Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) data platforms, and a structured approach to change management.

Which digital interventions are delivering the highest ROI across mining, production and logistics today?
In a capital- and cost-intensive sector like cement, the highest returns come from digital interventions that directly reduce unit costs or unlock latent capacity without significant capex.
Supply chain and planning (advanced analytics): Tools for demand forecasting, S&OP, network optimisation and scheduling deliver strong returns by lowering logistics costs, improving service levels, and aligning production with demand in a fragmented and regionally diverse market.
Mining (fleet and productivity analytics): Data-led mine planning, fleet analytics, despatch discipline, and idle-time reduction improve fuel efficiency and equipment utilisation, generating meaningful savings in a cost-heavy operation.
Manufacturing (APC and process analytics): Advanced Process Control, mill optimisation, and variability reduction improve thermal and electrical efficiency, stabilise quality and reduce rework and unplanned stoppages.
Customer experience and revenue enablement (digital platforms): Dealer and retailer apps, order visibility and digitally enabled technical services improve ease of doing business and responsiveness. We are also empowering channel partners with transparent, real-time information on schemes, including eligibility, utilisation status and actionable recommendations, which improves channel satisfaction and market execution while supporting revenue growth.
Overall, while Artificial Intelligence (AI) and IIoT are powerful enablers, it is advanced analytics anchored in strong processes that typically delivers the fastest and most reliable ROI.

How is real-time data helping plants shift from reactive maintenance to predictive and prescriptive operations?
Real-time and near real-time data is driving a more proactive and disciplined maintenance culture, beginning with visibility and progressively moving toward prediction and prescription.
At Shree Cement, we have implemented a robust SAP Plant Maintenance framework to standardise maintenance workflows. This is complemented by IIoT-driven condition monitoring, ensuring consistent capture of equipment health indicators such as vibration, temperature, load, operating patterns and alarms.
Real-time visibility enables early detection of abnormal conditions, allowing teams to intervene before failures occur. As data quality improves and failure histories become structured, predictive models can anticipate likely failure modes and recommend timely interventions, improving MTBF and reducing downtime. Over time, these insights will evolve into prescriptive actions, including spares readiness, maintenance scheduling, and operating parameter adjustments, enabling reliability optimisation with minimal disruption.
A critical success factor is adoption. Predictive insights deliver value only when they are embedded into daily workflows, roles and accountability structures. Without this, they remain insights without action.

In a cost-sensitive market like India, how do cement companies balance digital investment with price competitiveness?
In India’s intensely competitive cement market, digital investments must be tightly linked to tangible business outcomes, particularly cost reduction, service improvement, and faster decision-making.
This balance is achieved by prioritising high-impact use cases such as planning efficiency, logistics optimisation, asset reliability, and process stability, all of which typically deliver quick payback. Equally important is building scalable and governed digital foundations that reduce the marginal cost of rolling out new use cases across plants.
Digitally enabled order management, live despatch visibility, and channel partner platforms also improve customer centricity while controlling cost-to-serve, allowing service levels to improve without proportionate increases in headcount or overheads.
In essence, the most effective digital investments do not add cost. They protect margins by reducing variability, improving planning accuracy, and strengthening execution discipline.

How is digitalisation enabling measurable reductions in energy consumption, emissions, and overall carbon footprint?
Digitalisation plays a pivotal role in improving energy efficiency, reducing emissions and lowering overall carbon intensity.
Real-time monitoring and analytics enable near real-time tracking of energy consumption and critical operating parameters, allowing inefficiencies to be identified quickly and corrective actions to be implemented. Centralised data consolidation across plants enables benchmarking, accelerates best-practice adoption, and drives consistent improvements in energy performance.
Improved asset reliability through predictive maintenance reduces unplanned downtime and process instability, directly lowering energy losses. Digital platforms also support more effective planning and control of renewable energy sources and waste heat recovery systems, reducing dependence on fossil fuels.
Most importantly, digitalisation enables sustainability progress to be tracked with greater accuracy and consistency, supporting long-term ESG commitments.

What role does digital supply chain visibility play in managing demand volatility and regional market dynamics in India?
Digital supply chain visibility is critical in India, where demand is highly regional, seasonality is pronounced, and logistics constraints can shift rapidly.
At Shree Cement, planning operates across multiple horizons. Annual planning focuses on capacity, network footprint and medium-term demand. Monthly S&OP aligns demand, production and logistics, while daily scheduling drives execution-level decisions on despatch, sourcing and prioritisation.
As digital maturity increases, this structure is being augmented by central command-and-control capabilities that manage exceptions such as plant constraints, demand spikes, route disruptions and order prioritisation. Planning is also shifting from aggregated averages to granular, cost-to-serve and exception-based decision-making, improving responsiveness, lowering logistics costs and strengthening service reliability.

How prepared is the current workforce for Industry 4.0, and what reskilling strategies are proving most effective?
Workforce preparedness for Industry 4.0 is improving, though the primary challenge lies in scaling capabilities consistently across diverse roles.
The most effective approach is to define capability requirements by role and tailor enablement accordingly. Senior leadership focuses on digital literacy for governance, investment prioritisation, and value tracking. Middle management is enabled to use analytics for execution discipline and adoption. Frontline sales and service teams benefit from
mobile-first tools and KPI-driven workflows, while shop-floor and plant teams focus on data-driven operations, APC usage, maintenance discipline, safety and quality routines.
Personalised, role-based learning paths, supported by on-ground champions and a clear articulation of practical benefits, drive adoption far more effectively than generic training programmes.

Which emerging digital technologies will fundamentally reshape cement manufacturing in the next decade?
AI and GenAI are expected to have the most significant impact, particularly when combined with connected operations and disciplined processes.
Key technologies likely to reshape the sector include GenAI and agentic AI for faster root-cause analysis, knowledge access, and standardisation of best practices; industrial foundation models that learn patterns across large sensor datasets; digital twins that allow simulation of process changes before implementation; and increasingly autonomous control systems that integrate sensors, AI, and APC to maintain stability with minimal manual intervention.
Over time, this will enable more centralised monitoring and management of plant operations, supported by strong processes, training and capability-building.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Redefining Efficiency with Digitalisation

Published

on

By

Shares

Professor Procyon Mukherjee discusses how as the cement industry accelerates its shift towards digitalisation, data-driven technologies are becoming the mainstay of sustainability and control across the value chain.

The cement industry, long perceived as traditional and resistant to change, is undergoing a profound transformation driven by digital technologies. As global infrastructure demand grows alongside increasing pressure to decarbonise and improve productivity, cement manufacturers are adopting data-centric tools to enhance performance across the value chain. Nowhere is this shift more impactful than in grinding, which is the energy-intensive final stage of cement production, and in the materials that make grinding more efficient: grinding media and grinding aids.

The imperative for digitalisation
Cement production accounts for roughly 7 per cent to 8 per cent of global CO2 emissions, largely due to the energy intensity of clinker production and grinding processes. Digital solutions, such as AI-driven process controls and digital twins, are helping plants improve stability, cut fuel use and reduce emissions while maintaining consistent product quality. In one deployment alongside ABB’s process controls at a Heidelberg plant in Czechia, AI tools cut fuel use by 4 per cent and emissions by 2 per cent, while also improving operational stability.
Digitalisation in cement manufacturing encompasses a suite of technologies, broadly termed as Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), AI and machine learning, predictive analytics, cloud-based platforms, advanced process control and digital twins, each playing a role in optimising various stages of production from quarrying to despatch.

Grinding: The crucible of efficiency and cost
Of all the stages in cement production, grinding is among the most energy-intensive, historically consuming large amounts of electricity and representing a significant portion of plant operating costs. As a result, optimising grinding operations has become central to digital transformation strategies.
Modern digital systems are transforming grinding mills from mechanical workhorses into intelligent, interconnected assets. Sensors throughout the mill measure parameters such as mill load, vibration, mill speed, particle size distribution, and power consumption. This real-time data, fed into machine learning and advanced process control (APC) systems, can dynamically adjust operating conditions to maintain optimal throughput and energy usage.
For example, advanced grinding systems now predict inefficient conditions, such as impending mill overload, by continuously analysing acoustic and vibration signatures. The system can then proactively adjust clinker feed rates and grinding media distribution to sustain optimal conditions, reducing energy consumption and improving consistency.

Digital twins: Seeing grinding in the virtual world
One of the most transformative digital tools applied in cement grinding is the digital twin, which a real-time virtual replica of physical equipment and processes. By integrating sensor data and
process models, digital twins enable engineers to simulate process variations and run ‘what-if’
scenarios without disrupting actual production. These simulations support decisions on variables such as grinding media charge, mill speed and classifier settings, allowing optimisation of energy use and product fineness.
Digital twins have been used to optimise kilns and grinding circuits in plants worldwide, reducing unplanned downtime and allowing predictive maintenance to extend the life of expensive grinding assets.

Grinding media and grinding aids in a digital era
While digital technologies improve control and prediction, materials science innovations in grinding media and grinding aids have become equally crucial for achieving performance gains.
Grinding media, which comprise the balls or cylinders inside mills, directly influence the efficiency of clinker comminution. Traditionally composed of high-chrome cast iron or forged steel, grinding media account for nearly a quarter of global grinding media consumption by application, with efficiency improvements translating directly to lower energy intensity.
Recent advancements include ceramic and hybrid media that combine hardness and toughness to reduce wear and energy losses. For example, manufacturers such as Sanxin New Materials in China and Tosoh Corporation in Japan have developed sub-nano and zirconia media with exceptional wear resistance. Other innovations include smart media embedded with sensors to monitor wear, temperature, and impact forces in real time, enabling predictive maintenance and optimal media replacement scheduling. These digitally-enabled media solutions can increase grinding efficiency by as much as 15 per cent.
Complementing grinding media are grinding aids, which are chemical additives that improve mill throughput and reduce energy consumption by altering the surface properties of particles, trapping air, and preventing re-agglomeration. Technology leaders like SIKA AG and GCP Applied Technologies have invested in tailored grinding aids compatible with AI-driven dosing platforms that automatically adjust additive concentrations based on real-time mill conditions. Trials in South America reported throughput improvements nearing 19 per cent when integrating such digital assistive dosing with process control systems.
The integration of grinding media data and digital dosing of grinding aids moves the mill closer to a self-optimising system, where AI not only predicts media wear or energy losses but prescribes optimal interventions through automated dosing and operational adjustments.

Global case studies in digital adoption
Several cement companies around the world exemplify digital transformation in practice.
Heidelberg Materials has deployed digital twin technologies across global plants, achieving up to 15 per cent increases in production efficiency and 20 per cent reductions in energy consumption by leveraging real-time analytics and predictive algorithms.
Holcim’s Siggenthal plant in Switzerland piloted AI controllers that autonomously adjusted kiln operations, boosting throughput while reducing specific energy consumption and emissions.
Cemex, through its AI and predictive maintenance initiatives, improved kiln availability and reduced maintenance costs by predicting failures before they occurred. Global efforts also include AI process optimisation initiatives to reduce energy consumption and environmental impact.

Challenges and the road ahead
Despite these advances, digitalisation in cement grinding faces challenges. Legacy equipment may lack sensor readiness, requiring retrofits and edge-cloud connectivity upgrades. Data governance and integration across plants and systems remains a barrier for many mid-tier producers. Yet, digital transformation statistics show momentum: more than half of cement companies have implemented IoT sensors for equipment monitoring, and digital twin adoption is growing rapidly as part of broader Industry 4.0 strategies.
Furthermore, as digital systems mature, they increasingly support sustainability goals: reduced energy use, optimised media consumption and lower greenhouse gas emissions. By embedding intelligence into grinding circuits and material inputs like grinding aids, cement manufacturers can strike a balance between efficiency and environmental stewardship.
Conclusion
Digitalisation is not merely an add-on to cement manufacturing. It is reshaping the competitive and sustainability landscape of an industry often perceived as inertia-bound. With grinding representing a nexus of energy intensity and cost, digital technologies from sensor networks and predictive analytics to digital twins offer new levers of control. When paired with innovations in grinding media and grinding aids, particularly those with embedded digital capabilities, plants can achieve unprecedented gains in efficiency, predictability and performance.
For global cement producers aiming to reduce costs and carbon footprints simultaneously, the future belongs to those who harness digital intelligence not just to monitor operations, but to optimise and evolve them continuously.

About the author:
Professor Procyon Mukherjee, ex-CPO Lafarge-Holcim India, ex-President Hindalco, ex-VP Supply Chain Novelis Europe,
has been an industry leader in logistics, procurement, operations and supply chain management. His career spans 38 years starting from Philips, Alcan Inc (Indian Aluminum Company), Hindalco, Novelis and Holcim. He authored the book, ‘The Search for Value in Supply Chains’. He serves now as Visiting Professor in SP Jain Global, SIOM and as the Adjunct Professor at SBUP. He advises leading Global Firms including Consulting firms on SCM and Industrial Leadership and is a subject matter expert in aluminum and cement. An Alumnus of IIM Calcutta and Jadavpur University, he has completed the LH Senior Leadership Programme at IVEY Academy at Western University, Canada.

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds