Connect with us

Concrete

Golden rule for project managers

Published

on

Shares

Many a time, colleagues would ask me what is the sure shot recipe for success in managing projects. The answer would come to me very easily, and I would naturally respond by saying that there is no such magic bullet in project management. At the same time, I always hasten to add, that there is but one pre-condition for success. And that is, We must think of the project contractors as our partners, and not as opponents. This may sound quite easy to practice, but in actual practice I have seen that it is almost always observed in its violation. Contractor bashing is so common-place amongst us, that we have almost made it a religion in itself.

Before we delve into the strange behavioural aspects of this phenomenon, let me explain the contractual relationships that define a contractor. This is easier done with an example. Let us say that in Delhi, the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation enters into a public-private partnership with a company named DAMEPL for setting up the Airport Metro Line. Let us assume that DAMEPL, in turn, engages Siemens, among many other parties, to carry out signalling installation. Now, Siemens again, employs M/s XYZ Pvt Ltd for the actual erection work, and this XYZ Pvt Ltd asks M/s ABC Co., as labour contractors. Thus, in this illustration, we have created a 5 tier contractual structure. We can see here that as we step down this so called ladder, a contractor in turn becomes a customer, and that there are many customer-contractor relationships existing in such a large project at different levels.

I am a little confused. I do not know precisely why we tend to treat our contractors in a condescending manner, suspecting them all the time, and persecuting them all the time. Is this attitude rooted in our colonial past, or is it arising from our public sector mentality? Or, is it that we are always afraid to befriend the contractors, lest we are seen to be unfairly favouring them? Is it a cultural approach of ours, to play safe like true-blue bureaucrats, or is it driven by some kind of innermost sadistic tendencies that we harbour? I am clueless on this, but I do know this for a fact that we mistreat our contractors, and I also know that this can be most damaging for a project. Also, isn?? this behaviour surprising and downright funny, considering that the two entities, customer and contractor, have, in the end, a common purpose, which is to complete the project successfully.

Take the foregoing example. Going by our absolutely normal behaviour patterns, the project would have failed, (delayed, etc.) primarily because everyone in the whole chain who is a customer/owner would have dealt with the contractor down the line in the most non-cooperative and unhelpful manner. Like we say, in an organisation culture flows top down, in our example also, the way a customer will behave with the contractor, will largely depend on the kind of treatment he has in turn received as a contractor, from HIS customer. If DMRC were to follow the golden rule and embrace DAMEPL as a partner, this helpful attitude would have spread downward to DAMEPL, Siemens, and others. But alas, this is not to be! Even in a so-called ??ublic-private partnership??contract, the public sector makes a mockery of the word partnership, and proceeds to deal with the hapless ??artner(s)??in the traditional and time-tested contractor treatment formula.

One small corollary to this golden rule. A potential contractor is not necessarily a friend. We must maintain proper arms length distance in our interactions with all potential contractors, before the contract is awarded. During competitive bidding, during negotiations and during the finalisation process, the owner/customer will be well-advised to be distant, formal, fair and transparent with all competing bidders. But once the contract is signed with the successful bidder(s), they immediately become partners to embrace and not contractors to persecute. So we have to discriminate between the pre-contract and post-contract phases, in defining and shaping our relationship with our contractors.

To sum up, a project manager must view all contractors as partners, and not as a subordinate, nor as a necessary evil in a project. S/he must behave like a friend of the contractor, not as a foe. The contractor is very much a part of the project team, united in a common goal, and has to be treated as such. Remember, this is just a pre-condition to success in projects, not a complete solution to project management.

– SUMIT BANERJEE

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Concrete

UltraTech Cement FY26 PAT Crosses Rs 80 bn

Company reports record sales, profit and 200 MTPA capacity milestone

Published

on

By

Shares

UltraTech Cement reported record financial performance for Q4 and FY26, supported by strong volumes, higher profitability and improved cost efficiency. Consolidated net sales for Q4 FY26 rose 12 per cent year-on-year to Rs 254.67 billion, while PBIDT increased 20 per cent to Rs 56.88 billion. PAT, excluding exceptional items, grew 21 per cent to Rs 30.11 billion.

For FY26, consolidated net sales stood at Rs 873.84 billion, up 17 per cent from Rs 749.36 billion in FY25. PBIDT rose 32 per cent to Rs 175.98 billion, while PAT increased 36 per cent to Rs 83.05 billion, crossing the Rs 80 billion mark for the first time.

India grey cement volumes reached 42.41 million tonnes in Q4 FY26, up 9.3 per cent year-on-year, with capacity utilisation at 89 per cent. Full-year India grey cement volumes stood at 145 million tonnes. Energy costs declined 3 per cent, aided by a higher green power mix of 43 per cent in Q4.

The company’s domestic grey cement capacity has crossed 200 MTPA, reaching 200.1 MTPA, while global capacity stands at 205.5 MTPA. UltraTech also recommended a special dividend of Rs 2.40 billion per share value basis equivalent to Rs 240.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Towards Mega Batching

Optimised batching can drive overall efficiencies in large projects.

Published

on

By

Shares

India’s pace of infrastructure development is pushing the construction sector to work at a significantly higher scale than previously. Tight deadlines necessitate eliminating concreting delays, especially in large and mega projects, which, in turn, imply installing the right batching plant and ensuring batching is efficient. CW explores these steps as well as the gaps in India’s batching plant market.

Choose well

Large-scale infrastructure and building projects typically involve concrete consumption exceeding 30,000-50,000 cum per annum or demand continuous, high-volume pours within compressed timelines, according to Rahul R Wadhai, DGM – Quality, Tata Projects.

Considering the daily need for concrete, “large-scale concreting involves pouring more than 1,000–2,000 cum per day while mega projects involve more than 3,000 cum per day,” says Satish R Vachhani, Advanced Concrete & Construction Consultant…

To read the full article Click Here

Continue Reading

Concrete

Andhra Offers Discom Licences To Private Firms Outside Power Sector

Policy allows firms over 300 MW to seek distribution licences

Published

on

By

Shares

The Andhra Pradesh government will allow private firms that require more than 300 megawatt (MW) of power to apply for distribution licences, making the state the first to extend such licences beyond the power sector. The policy targets information technology, pharmaceuticals, steel and data centres and aims to reduce reliance on state utilities as demand rises for artificial intelligence infrastructure.

Approved applicants will be able to procure electricity directly from generators through power purchase agreements, a change officials said will create more competitive tariffs and reduce supply risk. Licence holders will use the Andhra Pradesh Transmission Company (APTRANSCO) network on payment of charges and will not need a separate distribution network initially.

Licences will be granted under the Electricity Act, 2003 framework, with the Central and State electricity regulators retaining authority over terms and approvals. The recent Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2025 sought to lower entry barriers, enable network sharing and encourage competition, while the state commission will set floor and ceiling tariffs where multiple discoms operate.

Industry players and original equipment manufacturers welcomed the policy, saying competitive supply is vital for large data centre investments. Major projects and partnerships such as those involving Adani and Google, Brookfield and Reliance, and Meta and Sify Technologies are expected to benefit as capacity expands in the state.

Analysts noted India’s data centre capacity is forecast to reach 10 gigawatts (GW) by 2030 and cited International Energy Agency estimates that global data centre electricity consumption could approach 945 terawatt hours by the same year. A one GW data centre needs an equivalent power allocation and one point five times the water, which authorities equated to 150 billion litres (150 bn litres).

Advisers warned that distribution licences will require close regulation and monitoring to prevent misuse and to ensure tariffs and supply obligations are met. Officials said the policy aims to balance investor requirements with regulatory oversight and could serve as a model for other states.

Continue Reading

Video Thumbnail

    SIGN-UP FOR OUR GENERAL NEWSLETTER


    Trending News

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

     

    Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

     


      This will close in 0 seconds