Connect with us

Economy & Market

Shaping a Low-Carbon Cement Future

Published

on

Shares

ICR explores how India’s cement industry is redefining emission control through advanced filtration, digital process optimisation, and low-carbon innovation.

Cement plants emit four key pollutants—CO2, NOx, SOx, and particulate matter (PM)—each arising from different stages of production. Most CO2 stems from limestone calcination and kiln fuel combustion, and while the sector’s CO2 intensity has remained flat, it must decline by ~4 per cent annually by 2030 to align with net-zero goals, as mentioned in or a report by the IEA. In kilns, thermal NOx dominates due to high flame temperatures (~1,200°C), SO2 originates from sulphur in fuel and raw materials, and PM is released from raw mill handling and clinker grinding—as mentioned in or a report by the EEA Guidebook (2023). At the global level, cement accounts for 6 per cent to 8 per cent of total CO2 emissions, highlighting the need for integrated emission strategies, as mentioned in or a report by the GCCA. India’s installed capacity grew from ~510 MTPA (2019) to ~632 MTPA (2024), reflecting ~4.4 per cent CAGR, as mentioned in or a report by JMK Research (2024). National GHG emissions reached ~4.13 GtCO2e in 2024, with cement responsible for 6 per cent to 7 per cent, largely concentrated among top producers, as mentioned in or a report by CARE Edge ESG (2025).
India’s cement roadmap targets net-zero CO2 by 2070, with milestones tied to efficiency, alternative fuels, SCMs, and carbon capture, as mentioned in or a report by TERI (2025). Policy frameworks are evolving accordingly: Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) for PM, SO2, and NOx are mandated to strengthen compliance and transparency, as mentioned in or a report by the CPCB. Globally, the IEA’s Breakthrough Agenda Report (2025) emphasises that achieving real decarbonisation requires parallel progress in process control, AFR, SCMs, and CCS, since total CO2 emissions remain above 2015 levels and intensity gains have plateaued. For India, the path forward lies in combining strict regulatory oversight with accelerated technology adoption—ensuring each tonne of clinker produced moves closer to compliance, efficiency, and long-term net-zero alignment.

Modern filtration systems: The first line of defence
Cement plants are swiftly moving beyond legacy electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) to high-efficiency baghouses, hybrids, and smart filter media that achieve ultra-low particulate emissions with tighter control. India’s regulatory drive has been crucial—CPCB’s 30 mg/Nm3 PM limit (also enforced by Delhi DPCC) has accelerated retrofits and new installations, as mentioned in or a report by CPCB and DPCC. Modern systems often outperform these standards: a Thermax kiln-raw mill project guaranteed =25 mg/Nm3, while an ESP-to-baghouse conversion in Asia cut dust from 40 to 9 mg/Nm3 (—78 per cent), as mentioned in or a report by Thermax and a peer-reviewed study. Indian majors like UltraTech are scaling this approach—converting hybrid filters to pulse-jet baghouses and upgrading cooler ESPs to further reduce PM, as mentioned in or a report by the company’s environmental filings.
Performance gains now hinge on advanced filter media. Plants using ePTFE/PTFE-membrane bags achieve cleaner filtration and drops from ~50 to ~30 mg/Nm³, while maintaining stable pressure loss, as mentioned in or a report by Orient Cement’s compliance report and an ePTFE study. Nanofiber-laminated felts and electrostatically enhanced baghouses promise lower pressure drop, longer bag life, and reduced fan power, as mentioned in or a report by the US EPA baghouse compendium. Vendors like Intensiv-Filter Himenviro now offer baghouses achieving <10 mg/Nm3 under optimal design and maintenance. The trend is clear: pulse-jet baghouses with advanced membranes and selective ESP upgrades are providing India’s cement sector with the compliance flexibility, energy efficiency, and reliability needed to thrive under its tighter emission regime.

Advanced process optimisation
Digitalisation and AI-based process optimisation have emerged as key levers for emission reduction in cement manufacturing, addressing pollutants at their source rather than at the stack. Across global and Indian plants, AI-driven kiln control systems like ABB’s Expert Optimiser and Carbon Re’s AI for Pyroprocess are redefining precision by integrating real-time data from sensors and APC loops to stabilise combustion, optimise fuel use, and limit NOx and CO formation. As mentioned in or a report by ABB (2024), advanced process control has cut fuel consumption by 3 per cent to 5 per cent and CO2 emissions by up to 5 per cent, while as mentioned in or a report by Carbon Re (2024), European plants achieved 4 per cent lower fuel use and 2 per cent CO2 reduction through AI kiln optimisation.
Indian majors like UltraTech, Dalmia, and Shree Cement are piloting such hybrid models combining process, energy, and environmental data for smarter emission management.
Vijay Mishra, Commercial Director, Knauf India says, “India’s construction materials sector is making steady progress toward circularity, moving beyond the earlier focus on “green buildings” to now addressing lifecycle impacts and resource recovery. While global leaders, particularly in Europe, benefit from mature collection and recycling infrastructure for materials like gypsum, metals, and aggregates, India is still in the early stages of building that ecosystem—but the momentum and policy direction are clearly positive. The country’s massive construction pipeline presents a unique opportunity: even modest gains in material reuse and low-carbon manufacturing could yield enormous environmental benefits. The main challenge remains infrastructure—segregation at site level, recovery logistics, and recycling facilities—but as these improve, the economics of circular materials will become more compelling. Looking ahead, the next decade of emission-conscious manufacturing will be shaped by material circularity, manufacturing efficiency, and digital traceability—turning waste into value, cutting emissions at source, and ensuring every sustainable action can be measured and rewarded. For manufacturers, this balance between innovation and responsibility will define the future of India’s low-carbon construction movement.”
The benefits extend beyond combustion. Real-time monitoring and predictive analytics enable operators to anticipate emission spikes and recalibrate process parameters automatically. As mentioned in or a report by the CII–Sohrabji Godrej Green Business Centre (2023), India’s top plants operate below 70 kWh/t cement (electrical) and 690 kcal/kg clinker (thermal)—benchmarks sustained through digital oversight. Digital twins and AI-driven models now simulate NOx reduction and fuel substitution scenarios, cutting trial errors. As mentioned in or a report by the IEA (2025), digitalisation is among the top three global levers for industrial decarbonisation, capable of reducing cement CO2 emissions by up to 8 per cent by 2030. The future of emission control will depend less on end-of-pipe systems and more on intelligent, adaptive process control that keeps every second of kiln operation cleaner, stable, and efficient.

From capture to co-processing
The cement industry’s decarbonisation pathway now rests on two pivotal levers—Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) and Alternative Fuels and Raw Materials (AFR)—each addressing a distinct source of emissions. While process emissions from limestone calcination are unavoidable, CCUS provides a route to capture, reuse, or store CO2, whereas AFR mitigates combustion-related emissions by substituting fossil fuels with renewable or waste-derived alternatives. Together, they form the “dual engine” of deep decarbonisation, capable of reducing total CO2 emissions by over 40 per cent in advanced systems, as mentioned in or a report by the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA, 2024). Globally, CCUS is moving from pilots to commercial reality—as mentioned in or a report by Heidelberg Materials (2024), the Brevik CCS plant in Norway will capture 400,000 tonnes of CO2 annually, while Holcim’s GO4ZERO project in Belgium aims for 1.1 million tonnes by 2029, establishing Europe as the proving ground for full-scale capture. As mentioned in or a report by TERI (2025), India is now developing its own CCUS roadmap, with Dalmia Cement and Carbon Clean partnering on a 500,000 tCO2/year project in Tamil Nadu—the country’s first commercial-scale cement CCUS initiative. Meanwhile, as mentioned in or a report by the NITI Aayog–GCCA policy brief (2024), frameworks are being designed for carbon capture finance corporations and shared storage clusters to accelerate deployment.
Raj Bagri, CEO, Kapture says, “Decarbonising cement production is crucial, but while the focus is often on the main kiln, the surrounding infrastructure, including essential diesel generators remains a source of carbon pollution. These generators provide crucial backup or primary power for on-site operations, contributing to a plant’s overall carbon footprint. Kapture addresses this with a cost- effective, easily retrofittable technology that captures CO2 directly from diesel generator exhaust. Kapture’s innovative approach transforms the captured carbon into a stable, solid byproduct. This material then closes the loop by being sequestered in concrete. By serving as a direct replacement for a portion of virgin clinker, Kapture’s. byproduct actively offsets the hard-to-abate process emissions that dominate the cement industry. This circular economy model provides a powerful solution. It immediately cuts combustion emissions from the auxiliary power source and simultaneously reduces the need for high-carbon raw materials in the concrete mix, Kapture offers the cement industry a pathway to both clean up their power and drastically lower the carbon intensity of their end-product.”
Parallel to carbon capture, the rise of AFR is redefining combustion efficiency and circularity across Indian plants. As mentioned in or a report by the CII–Sohrabji Godrej Green Business Centre (2023), India’s Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) averages 6 per cent to 8 per cent, with leaders such as UltraTech, ACC, and Geocycle already achieving 15 per cent to 20 per cent through co-processing Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), biomass, and industrial waste. This transition reduces dependence on coal and petcoke while diverting thousands of tonnes of waste from landfills. The MoEFCC aims to raise TSR to 25 per cent by 2025, in line with India’s Circular Economy Action Plan, and as mentioned in or a report by the IEA (2023), such substitution can cut specific CO2 emissions by 12 per cent to 15 per cent. Although cost, scale, and infrastructure remain challenges, India’s combined progress in CCUS and AFR signals a powerful shift—toward a future where carbon is captured and reused, waste becomes a valuable fuel, and cement production evolves into a truly circular, low-emission system.

Instrumentation, data transparency, and continuous monitoring
Real-time monitoring has become central to emission management in cement manufacturing, replacing periodic sampling with Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) that track PM, SO2, and NOx continuously. As mentioned in or a report by the CPCB (2024), CEMS installation is now mandatory for all integrated plants in India, with live data streaming to regulatory servers for verification. These systems enhance transparency and allow operators to act before emissions exceed limits. Complementing them, IoT-based sensors for baghouse performance and draft fans are cutting downtime by up to 30 per cent, as mentioned in or a report by Frost and Sullivan (2024). Many states now mandate continuous online air-quality reporting, creating a real-time loop between regulators, operators, and technology providers. As mentioned in or a report by the GCCA (2024/25), leading producers are integrating digital emission platforms that combine CEMS data, process sensors, and ESG metrics, building both compliance and investor confidence. Globally, as mentioned in or a report by the IEA (2025), smart sensors and automated reporting can cut non-compliance events by up to 40 per cent while boosting efficiency. For India, scaling such data-driven frameworks will ensure emission control evolves from a reactive measure to a proactive, intelligence-led sustainability system.

Regulatory framework and global benchmarks
India’s cement industry operates under one of the most stringent emission control regimes among developing nations, with the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) setting specific stack emission limits for key pollutants—30 mg/Nm³ for particulate matter (PM), 800 mg/Nm3 for NOx, and 100 mg/Nm3 for SO2 from kiln and clinker cooler outlets, as mentioned in or a report by the CPCB (2024). These norms are comparable to the EU-Best Available Techniques (EU-BAT) reference levels, which stipulate 10–30 mg/Nm3 for PM, 200–800 mg/Nm3 for NOx, and 50–400 mg/Nm3 for SO2, depending on plant design and fuel type—as mentioned in or a report by the European Commission’s BAT Reference Document (BREF, 2023). Meanwhile, US-EPA’s National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) require PM to be maintained below 30 mg/Nm3 for new cement kilns, reinforcing global convergence toward tighter thresholds. India’s 2016 revision of cement emission norms marked a watershed moment, reducing permissible PM levels from 150 mg/Nm3 to 30 mg/Nm3, driving widespread retrofits of ESPs and installation of high-efficiency baghouses across major plants. As highlighted in a TERI policy paper (2025), nearly 80 per cent of India’s integrated cement capacity now complies with these upgraded standards, supported by Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) and regular digital reporting to state pollution control boards—placing India’s emission control framework among the most advanced and transparent in the Global South.

Building a low-emission, high-performance industry
India’s cement sector stands at a defining crossroads—where growth and sustainability must advance together. With production projected to exceed 600 million tonnes by 2028, as mentioned in or a report by JMK Research (2024), India’s leadership in emission control will shape global low-carbon manufacturing. Over the past decade, regulatory reform, CPCB’s 30 mg/Nm3 PM limits, continuous monitoring, and ESP-to-baghouse conversions have brought India close to EU and US benchmarks. The next leap requires integrated decarbonisation—linking AI-driven optimisation, renewable energy, alternative fuels, and carbon capture. As mentioned in or a report by the IEA (2025), digital technologies can reduce CO2 emissions by up to 8 per cent by 2030, while CCUS and AFR could cut process-related emissions by 40 per cent to 50 per cent. Meanwhile, R&D in LC³ and belite cements, combined with circular-economy co-processing, is reshaping both the chemistry and carbon profile of Indian cement. Policy incentives, carbon finance, and strong industry–academia collaboration will be key to making India a pioneer in green cement.
Ultimately, emission control is becoming a strategic advantage, not just compliance. The future cement plant will be a hybrid of automation, accountability, and adaptive design, where digital twins optimise processes and every gram of carbon is tracked. By coupling robust policy frameworks with investment in skills, digital infrastructure, and collaborative innovation, India can redefine sustainable heavy industry. The goal now is not incremental change but transformational adoption, where every avoided emission strengthens both the planet and profitability. With its evolving ecosystem of technology, regulation, and intent, India’s cement sector is poised to become a global benchmark for low-emission, high-performance manufacturing and a model for industrial decarbonisation.

Carbon Emissions in Ready-Mix Concrete

This case study, published in Case Studies in Construction Materials (Elsevier, Jan 2025) by Zuojiang Lin, Guangyao Lyu, and Kuizhen Fang, examines carbon emissions in C30–C80 ready-mix concrete in China and explores CO2 reduction through SCMs, transport optimisation, and manufactured sand use.

This study analyses the carbon emissions of C30–C80 ready-mixed concrete using a large-scale mix proportion dataset from across China. The research applies a life-cycle assessment (LCA) based on IPCC and ISO 14040 standards to calculate total emissions, covering raw material production, transportation, manufacturing, and concrete delivery. The findings reveal that average carbon emissions range between 262.61 and 401.78 kgCO2e/m3, with cement accounting for about 90 per cent of embodied emissions. The study establishes that emission variations primarily arise from differences in cement dosage and raw material composition rather than energy use in manufacturing or transport.
The study identifies Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs)—such as fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, and silica fume—as major contributors to CO2 reduction. By partially replacing cement, SCMs lowered total emissions by 5 per cent to 30 per cent while maintaining equivalent strength levels. However, around 11 per cent of samples showed negative reduction rates, indicating that improper SCM selection or inconsistent material quality can offset benefits. The relationship between SCM substitution rates and CO2 reduction was found to be positively correlated but weakly linear, with considerable data dispersion due to mix variability.
Transport distance was also evaluated as a significant but secondary factor influencing emissions. The study found that CO2 reduction benefits from SCMs remained stable until transport distances exceeded 4166 km, beyond which the gains were nullified. For every additional 100 km of SCM transport by truck, the carbon reduction rate decreased by only 0.45 per cent. Comparatively, long-distance transport of aggregates from 100 km to 500 km increased concrete’s carbon emissions by over 10 per cent. This highlights the higher sensitivity of total emissions to aggregate logistics than SCM transport.
Lastly, the study analysed manufactured sand (MS) as a substitute for natural fine aggregates (NFA). While MS reduces transport-related emissions due to shorter sourcing distances, it increases total production energy consumption and can reduce concrete strength. When 50 per cent to 100 per cent of NFA was replaced with MS, total CO2 emissions remained largely unchanged. The authors conclude that SCMs offer clear and stable low-carbon benefits, whereas MS requires technological optimisation to realise its potential. Overall, the research provides quantitative evidence supporting low-carbon labelling standards for China’s concrete industry and underscores the importance of balancing strength, sourcing, and sustainability.

Reducing CO2 in Cement Production

This case study, published in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (ACS Publications, Sept 2024) by Franco Williams and Aidong Yang, investigates CO2 reduction in cement manufacturing through alternative clinker compositions and CO2 mineralisation, achieving up to 45.5 per cent energy and 35.1 per cent CO2 savings in simulations.

This study investigates strategies for reducing CO2 emissions in cement production, which currently contributes around 8 per cent of global anthropogenic CO2. Using Aspen Plus V12.1 process simulations, seven clinker production scenarios were analysed — including Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), three variants of High-Ferrite Clinker (HFC), Belite-Ye’elimite-Ferrite Clinker (BYF), Calcium Silicate Cement (CSC), and a hybrid option combining OPC with a Supplementary Cementitious Material (SCM) produced via CO2 mineralisation. The objective was to quantify differences in energy demand and CO2 emissions under natural gas–fuelled conditions and assess the decarbonisation potential of each composition.
The simulations revealed that alternative clinkers significantly outperform OPC in both energy efficiency and carbon footprint. OPC clinker production required 1220.4 kWh/t, emitting 741.5 kgCO2/t clinker, while CSC clinker achieved the lowest total energy intensity at 665.1 kWh/t, corresponding to a 45.5 per cent energy reduction and 35.1 per cent CO2 reduction. This efficiency stems from CSC’s low CaCO3 input (989.7 kg/t clinker) and sintering temperature of 1250°C, compared to OPC’s 1271.5 kg/t and 1500°C. The BYF clinker followed with 31.3 per cent energy savings and 27.5 per cent CO2 reduction, while HFC variants achieved moderate reductions of 3.1 per cent to 6.4 per cent in CO2 emissions.
For the SCM + OPC scenario, 25 per cent of the clinker was replaced with SCM derived from CO2 mineralisation. Despite a higher total energy requirement (1239.6 kWh/t) due to capture and mineralisation energy, this option delivered the greatest CO2 reduction—up to 44.8 per cent relative to OPC. The benefit was attributed to CO2 absorption during mineralisation and reduced clinker mass. However, the study noted that the energy intensity of mineralisation (1.30 kWh/kg SCM) exceeded that of clinker production (1.22 kWh/kg), indicating that this strategy’s effectiveness depends on access to low-carbon electricity sources.
Geographical variations also influenced the overall carbon footprint. When accounting for electricity grid emissions, Brazil showed the lowest total CO2 output (482.7 kgCO2/t) for SCM-integrated cement due to its green energy mix, compared to 601.6 kgCO2/t in China and 556.1 kgCO2/t in the United States. For CSC clinker, total reductions were 35.7 per cent, 36.0 per cent, and 35.3 per cent respectively across these countries. This emphasises that decarbonisation gains are highly dependent on the carbon intensity of local power grids.
Supporting simulations demonstrated that lowering sintering temperatures alone (to 1350°C or 1250°C) could reduce total energy consumption by 7 per cent to 17.5 per cent and CO2 emissions by 1 per cent to 2.6 per cent. However, these results are modest compared to the full compositional changes in alternative clinkers, confirming that reducing CaCO3 content in the raw meal contributes more significantly to CO2 mitigation. The decomposition of CaCO3 releases 0.44 kg CO2 per kg CaCO3 and requires 179.4 kJ/kmol of heat; hence, formulations with reduced limestone and alite (C3S) contents inherently lower both emissions and energy demand.
In conclusion, the study establishes that Calcium Silicate Cement (CSC) is the most energy-efficient clinker alternative, while SCM-integrated OPC achieves the highest CO2 reduction potential under green-energy conditions. The authors highlight that the decarbonisation of electricity supply is crucial for maximising the benefits of CO2 mineralisation-based SCMs. These results underscore that altering clinker chemistry and incorporating CO2 utilisation pathways are practical, high-impact strategies for achieving deep decarbonisation in the cement industry and align with global net-zero goals.

Concrete

Refractory demands in our kiln have changed

Published

on

By

Shares

Radha Singh, Senior Manager (P&Q), Shree Digvijay Cement, points out why performance, predictability and life-cycle value now matter more than routine replacement in cement kilns.

As Indian cement plants push for higher throughput, increased alternative fuel usage and tighter shutdown cycles, refractory performance in kilns and pyro-processing systems is under growing pressure. In this interview, Radha Singh, Senior Manager (P&Q), Shree Digvijay Cement, shares how refractory demands have evolved on the ground and how smarter digital monitoring is improving kiln stability, uptime and clinker quality.

How have refractory demands changed in your kiln and pyro-processing line over the last five years?
Over the last five years, refractory demands in our kiln and pyro line have changed. Earlier, the focus was mostly on standard grades and routine shutdown-based replacement. But now, because of higher production loads, more alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR) usage and greater temperature variation, the expectation from refractory has increased.
In our own case, the current kiln refractory has already completed around 1.5 years, which itself shows how much more we now rely on materials that can handle thermal shock, alkali attack and coating fluctuations. We have moved towards more stable, high-performance linings so that we don’t have to enter the kiln frequently for repairs.
Overall, the shift has been from just ‘installation and run’ to selecting refractories that give longer life, better coating behaviour and more predictable performance under tougher operating conditions.

What are the biggest refractory challenges in the preheater, calciner and cooler zones?
• Preheater: Coating instability, chloride/sulphur cycles and brick erosion.
• Calciner: AFR firing, thermal shock and alkali infiltration.
• Cooler: Severe abrasion, red-river formation and mechanical stress on linings.
Overall, the biggest challenge is maintaining lining stability under highly variable operating conditions.

How do you evaluate and select refractory partners for long-term performance?
In real plant conditions, we don’t select a refractory partner just by looking at price. First, we see their past performance in similar kilns and whether their material has actually survived our operating conditions. We also check how strong their technical support is during shutdowns, because installation quality matters as much as the material itself.
Another key point is how quickly they respond during breakdowns or hot spots. A good partner should be available on short notice. We also look at their failure analysis capability, whether they can explain why a lining failed and suggest improvements.
On top of this, we review the life they delivered in the last few campaigns, their supply reliability and their willingness to offer plant-specific custom solutions instead of generic grades. Only a partner who supports us throughout the life cycle, which includes selection, installation, monitoring and post-failure analysis, fits our long-term requirement.

Can you share a recent example where better refractory selection improved uptime or clinker quality?
Recently, we upgraded to a high-abrasion basic brick at the kiln outlet. Earlier we had frequent chipping and coating loss. With the new lining, thermal stability improved and the coating became much more stable. As a result, our shutdown interval increased and clinker quality remained more consistent. It had a direct impact on our uptime.

How is increased AFR use affecting refractory behaviour?
Increased AFR use is definitely putting more stress on the refractory. The biggest issue we see daily is the rise in chlorine, alkalis and volatiles, which directly attack the lining, especially in the calciner and kiln inlet. AFR firing is also not as stable as conventional fuel, so we face frequent temperature fluctuations, which cause more thermal shock and small cracks in the lining.
Another real problem is coating instability. Some days the coating builds too fast, other days it suddenly drops, and both conditions impact refractory life. We also notice more dust circulation and buildup inside the calciner whenever the AFR mix changes, which again increases erosion.
Because of these practical issues, we have started relying more on alkali-resistant, low-porosity and better thermal shock–resistant materials to handle the additional stress coming from AFR.

What role does digital monitoring or thermal profiling play in your refractory strategy?
Digital tools like kiln shell scanners, IR imaging and thermal profiling help us detect weakening areas much earlier. This reduces unplanned shutdowns, helps identify hotspots accurately and allows us to replace only the critical sections. Overall, our maintenance has shifted from reactive to predictive, improving lining life significantly.

How do you balance cost, durability and installation speed during refractory shutdowns?
We focus on three points:
• Material quality that suits our thermal profile and chemistry.
• Installation speed, in fast turnarounds, we prefer monolithic.
• Life-cycle cost—the cheapest material is not the most economical. We look at durability, future downtime and total cost of ownership.
This balance ensures reliable performance without unnecessary expenditure.

What refractory or pyro-processing innovations could transform Indian cement operations?
Some promising developments include:
• High-performance, low-porosity and nano-bonded refractories
• Precast modular linings to drastically reduce shutdown time
• AI-driven kiln thermal analytics
• Advanced coating management solutions
• More AFR-compatible refractory mixes

These innovations can significantly improve kiln stability, efficiency and maintenance planning across the industry.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Digital supply chain visibility is critical

Published

on

By

Shares

MSR Kali Prasad, Chief Digital and Information Officer, Shree Cement, discusses how data, discipline and scale are turning Industry 4.0 into everyday business reality.

Over the past five years, digitalisation in Indian cement manufacturing has moved decisively beyond experimentation. Today, it is a strategic lever for cost control, operational resilience and sustainability. In this interview, MSR Kali Prasad, Chief Digital and Information Officer, Shree Cement, explains how integrated digital foundations, advanced analytics and real-time visibility are helping deliver measurable business outcomes.

How has digitalisation moved from pilot projects to core strategy in Indian cement manufacturing over the past five years?
Digitalisation in Indian cement has evolved from isolated pilot initiatives into a core business strategy because outcomes are now measurable, repeatable and scalable. The key shift has been the move away from standalone solutions toward an integrated digital foundation built on standardised processes, governed data and enterprise platforms that can be deployed consistently across plants and functions.
At Shree Cement, this transition has been very pragmatic. The early phase focused on visibility through dashboards, reporting, and digitisation of critical workflows. Over time, this has progressed into enterprise-level analytics and decision support across manufacturing and the supply chain,
with clear outcomes in cost optimisation, margin protection and revenue improvement through enhanced customer experience.
Equally important, digital is no longer the responsibility of a single function. It is embedded into day-to-day operations across planning, production, maintenance, despatch and customer servicing, supported by enterprise systems, Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) data platforms, and a structured approach to change management.

Which digital interventions are delivering the highest ROI across mining, production and logistics today?
In a capital- and cost-intensive sector like cement, the highest returns come from digital interventions that directly reduce unit costs or unlock latent capacity without significant capex.
Supply chain and planning (advanced analytics): Tools for demand forecasting, S&OP, network optimisation and scheduling deliver strong returns by lowering logistics costs, improving service levels, and aligning production with demand in a fragmented and regionally diverse market.
Mining (fleet and productivity analytics): Data-led mine planning, fleet analytics, despatch discipline, and idle-time reduction improve fuel efficiency and equipment utilisation, generating meaningful savings in a cost-heavy operation.
Manufacturing (APC and process analytics): Advanced Process Control, mill optimisation, and variability reduction improve thermal and electrical efficiency, stabilise quality and reduce rework and unplanned stoppages.
Customer experience and revenue enablement (digital platforms): Dealer and retailer apps, order visibility and digitally enabled technical services improve ease of doing business and responsiveness. We are also empowering channel partners with transparent, real-time information on schemes, including eligibility, utilisation status and actionable recommendations, which improves channel satisfaction and market execution while supporting revenue growth.
Overall, while Artificial Intelligence (AI) and IIoT are powerful enablers, it is advanced analytics anchored in strong processes that typically delivers the fastest and most reliable ROI.

How is real-time data helping plants shift from reactive maintenance to predictive and prescriptive operations?
Real-time and near real-time data is driving a more proactive and disciplined maintenance culture, beginning with visibility and progressively moving toward prediction and prescription.
At Shree Cement, we have implemented a robust SAP Plant Maintenance framework to standardise maintenance workflows. This is complemented by IIoT-driven condition monitoring, ensuring consistent capture of equipment health indicators such as vibration, temperature, load, operating patterns and alarms.
Real-time visibility enables early detection of abnormal conditions, allowing teams to intervene before failures occur. As data quality improves and failure histories become structured, predictive models can anticipate likely failure modes and recommend timely interventions, improving MTBF and reducing downtime. Over time, these insights will evolve into prescriptive actions, including spares readiness, maintenance scheduling, and operating parameter adjustments, enabling reliability optimisation with minimal disruption.
A critical success factor is adoption. Predictive insights deliver value only when they are embedded into daily workflows, roles and accountability structures. Without this, they remain insights without action.

In a cost-sensitive market like India, how do cement companies balance digital investment with price competitiveness?
In India’s intensely competitive cement market, digital investments must be tightly linked to tangible business outcomes, particularly cost reduction, service improvement, and faster decision-making.
This balance is achieved by prioritising high-impact use cases such as planning efficiency, logistics optimisation, asset reliability, and process stability, all of which typically deliver quick payback. Equally important is building scalable and governed digital foundations that reduce the marginal cost of rolling out new use cases across plants.
Digitally enabled order management, live despatch visibility, and channel partner platforms also improve customer centricity while controlling cost-to-serve, allowing service levels to improve without proportionate increases in headcount or overheads.
In essence, the most effective digital investments do not add cost. They protect margins by reducing variability, improving planning accuracy, and strengthening execution discipline.

How is digitalisation enabling measurable reductions in energy consumption, emissions, and overall carbon footprint?
Digitalisation plays a pivotal role in improving energy efficiency, reducing emissions and lowering overall carbon intensity.
Real-time monitoring and analytics enable near real-time tracking of energy consumption and critical operating parameters, allowing inefficiencies to be identified quickly and corrective actions to be implemented. Centralised data consolidation across plants enables benchmarking, accelerates best-practice adoption, and drives consistent improvements in energy performance.
Improved asset reliability through predictive maintenance reduces unplanned downtime and process instability, directly lowering energy losses. Digital platforms also support more effective planning and control of renewable energy sources and waste heat recovery systems, reducing dependence on fossil fuels.
Most importantly, digitalisation enables sustainability progress to be tracked with greater accuracy and consistency, supporting long-term ESG commitments.

What role does digital supply chain visibility play in managing demand volatility and regional market dynamics in India?
Digital supply chain visibility is critical in India, where demand is highly regional, seasonality is pronounced, and logistics constraints can shift rapidly.
At Shree Cement, planning operates across multiple horizons. Annual planning focuses on capacity, network footprint and medium-term demand. Monthly S&OP aligns demand, production and logistics, while daily scheduling drives execution-level decisions on despatch, sourcing and prioritisation.
As digital maturity increases, this structure is being augmented by central command-and-control capabilities that manage exceptions such as plant constraints, demand spikes, route disruptions and order prioritisation. Planning is also shifting from aggregated averages to granular, cost-to-serve and exception-based decision-making, improving responsiveness, lowering logistics costs and strengthening service reliability.

How prepared is the current workforce for Industry 4.0, and what reskilling strategies are proving most effective?
Workforce preparedness for Industry 4.0 is improving, though the primary challenge lies in scaling capabilities consistently across diverse roles.
The most effective approach is to define capability requirements by role and tailor enablement accordingly. Senior leadership focuses on digital literacy for governance, investment prioritisation, and value tracking. Middle management is enabled to use analytics for execution discipline and adoption. Frontline sales and service teams benefit from
mobile-first tools and KPI-driven workflows, while shop-floor and plant teams focus on data-driven operations, APC usage, maintenance discipline, safety and quality routines.
Personalised, role-based learning paths, supported by on-ground champions and a clear articulation of practical benefits, drive adoption far more effectively than generic training programmes.

Which emerging digital technologies will fundamentally reshape cement manufacturing in the next decade?
AI and GenAI are expected to have the most significant impact, particularly when combined with connected operations and disciplined processes.
Key technologies likely to reshape the sector include GenAI and agentic AI for faster root-cause analysis, knowledge access, and standardisation of best practices; industrial foundation models that learn patterns across large sensor datasets; digital twins that allow simulation of process changes before implementation; and increasingly autonomous control systems that integrate sensors, AI, and APC to maintain stability with minimal manual intervention.
Over time, this will enable more centralised monitoring and management of plant operations, supported by strong processes, training and capability-building.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Cement Additives for Improved Grinding Efficiency

Published

on

By

Shares

Shreesh A Khadilkar discusses how advanced additive formulations allow customised, high-performance and niche cements—offering benefits while supporting blended cements and long-term cost and carbon reduction.

Cement additives are chemicals (inorganic and organic) added in small amounts (0.01 per cent to 0.2 per cent by weight) during cement grinding. Their main job? Reduce agglomeration, prevent pack-set, and keep the mill running smoother. Thus, these additions primarily improve, mill thru-puts, achieve lower clinker factor in blended cements PPC/PSC/PCC. Additionally, these additives improve concrete performance of cements or even for specific special premium cements with special USPs like lower setting times or for reduced water permeability in the resultant cement mortars and concrete (water repellent /permeation resistant cements), corrosion resistance etc.
The cement additives are materials which could be further differentiated as:

Grinding aids:
• Bottlenecks in cement grinding capacity, such materials can enhance throughputs
• Low specific electrical energy consumption during cement grinding
• Reduce “Pack set” problem and improve powder flowability

Quality improvers:
• Opportunity for further clinker factor reduction
• Solution for delayed cement setting or strength development issues at early or later ages.

Others: materials which are used for specific special cements with niche properties as discussed in the subsequent pages.
When cement additives are used as grinding aids or quality improvers, in general the additives reduce the inter-particle forces; reduce coating over grinding media and mill internals. Due to creation of like charges on cement particles, there is decreased agglomeration, much improved flowability, higher generation of fines better dispersion of particles in separator feed and reduction of mill filling level (decrease of residence time). However, in VRM grinding; actions need to be taken to have stable bed formation on the table.
It has been reported in literature and also substantiated by a number of detailed evaluations of different cement additive formulations in market, that the cement additive formulations are a combination of different chemical compounds, typically composed of:

  1. Accelerator/s for the hydration reaction of cements which are dependent on the acceleration effect desired in mortar compressive strengths at early or later ages, the choice of the materials is also dependent on clinker quality and blending components (flyash / slag) or a mix of both.
  2. Water reducer / workability / wet-ability enhancer, which would show impact on the resultant cement mortars and concrete. Some of the compounds (retarders) like polysaccharide derivatives, gluconates etc., show an initial retarding action towards hydration which result in reducing the water requirements for the cements thus act as water reducers, or it could be some appropriate polymeric molecules which show improved wet-ability and reduce water demand. These are selected based on the mineral component and type of cements (PPC/PSC /PCC).
  3. Grinding aids: Compounds that work as Grinding Aid i.e. which would enhance Mill thru-put on one hand as well as would increase the early strengths due to the higher fines generation/ or activation of cement components. These compounds could be like alkanol-amines such as TIPA, DEIPA, TEA etc. or could be compounds like glycols and other poly-ols, depending on whether it is OPC or PPC or PSC or PCC manufacture.

Mechanism of action — Step By Step—

  1. Reduce Agglomeration, Cement particles get electrostatically charged during grinding, stick together, form “flocs”, block mill efficiency, waste energy. Grinding aid molecules adsorb onto particle surfaces, neutralise charge, prevent re-agglomeration.
  2. Improve Powder Flowability, Adsorbed molecules create a lubricating layer, particles slide past each other easier, better mill throughput, less “dead zone” buildup.
    Also reduces caking on mill liners, diaphragms, and separator screens, less downtime for cleaning.
  3. Enhance Grinding Efficiency (Finer Product Faster), By preventing agglomeration, particles stay dispersed more surface area exposed to grinding media, finer grind achieved with same energy input, Or: same fineness achieved with less energy, huge savings.
    Example:
    • Without aid ? 3500 cm²/g Blaine needs 40 kWh/ton
    • With use of optimum grinding aid same fineness at 32 kWh/ton 20 per cent energy savings
  4. Reduce Pack Set and Silo Caking Grinding aids (GA) inhibit hydration of free lime (CaO) during storage prevents premature hardening or “pack set” in silos. especially critical in humid climates or with high free lime clinker.
    It may be stated here that Overdosing of GA can cause: – Foaming in mill (especially with glycols) reduces grinding efficiency, retardation of cement setting (especially with amines/acids), odor issues (in indoor mills) – Corrosion of mill components (if acidic aids used improperly)
    The best practice to optimise use of GA is Start with 0.02 per cent to 0.05 per cent dosage test fineness, flow, and set time adjust up/down. Due to static charge of particles, the sample may stick to the sides of sampler pipe and so sampling need to be properly done.
    Depending on type of cements i.e. OPC, PPC, PSC, PCC, the grinding aids combinations need to be optimised, a typical Poly carboxylate ether also could be a part of the combo grinding aids

Cement additives for niche properties of the cement in concrete.
The cement additives can also be tailor made to create specific niche properties in cements, OPC, PPC, PSC and PCC to create premium or special brands. The special niche properties of the cement being its additional USP of such cement products, and are useful for customers to build a durable concrete structure with increased service life.


Such properties could be:
• Additives for improved concrete performance of cements, high early strength in PPC/PSC/PCC, much reduced water demand in cement, cements with improved slump retentivity in concrete, self-compacting, self levelling in concrete, cements with improved adhesion property of the cement mortar
• Water repellence / water proofing, permeability resistance in mortars and concrete.
• Biocidal cement
• Photo catalytic cements
• Cements with negligible ASR reactions etc.

Additives for cements for improved concrete performance
High early strengths: Use of accelerators. These are chemical compounds which enhance the degree of hydration of cement. These can include setting or hardening accelerators depending on whether their action occurs in the plastic or hardened state respectively. Thus, the setting accelerators reduce the setting time, whereas the hardening accelerators increase the early age strengths. The setting accelerators act during the initial minutes of the cement hydration, whereas the hardening accelerators act mainly during the initial days of hydration.
Chloride salts are the best in class. However, use of chloride salts as hardening accelerators are strongly discouraged for their action in promoting the corrosion of rebar, thus, chloride-free accelerators are preferred. The hardening accelerators could be combinations of compounds like nitrate, nitrite and thiocyanate salts of alkali or alkaline earth metals or thiosulphate, formate, and alkanol amines depending on the cement types.
However, especially in blended cements (PPC/PSC/PCC the increased early strengths invariably decrease the 28 day strengths. These aspects lead to creating combo additives along with organic polymers to achieve improved early strengths as well as either same or marginally improved 28 days strengths with reduced clinker factor in the blended cement, special OPC with reduced admixture requirements. With use of appropriate combination of inorganic and organic additives we could create an OPC with substantially reduced water demand or improved slump retentivity. Use of such an OPC would show exceptional concrete performance in high grade concretes as it would exhibit lower admixture requirements in High Grade Concretes.
PPC with OPC like properties: With the above concept we could have a PPC, having higher percentage flyash, with a combo cement additive which would have with concrete performance similar to OPC in say M40/M50 concrete. Such a PPC would produce a high-strength PPC concrete (= 60 MPa @ 28d) + improved workability, durability and sustainability.
Another interesting aspect could also be of using ultrafine fine flyash /ultrafine slags as additions in OPC/PPC/PSC for achieving lower clinker factor as well as to achieve improved later age strengths with or without a combo cement additive.
The initial adhesion property at sites of especially PPC/PSC/PCC based mortars can be improved through use of appropriate organic polymers addition during the manufacture of these cements. Such cements would have a better adhesion property for plastering/brick bonding etc., as it has much lower rebound loss of their mortars in such applications.
It is needless to mention here that with use of additives, we could also have cement with viscosity modifying cement additives, for self-compaction and self-leveling concrete performance.
Use of Phosphogypsum retards the setting time of cements, we can use additive different additive combos to overcome retardation and improve the 1 day strengths of the cements and concretes.

About the author:
Shreesh Khadilkar, Consultant & Advisor, Former Director Quality & Product Development, ACC, a seasoned consultant and advisor, brings over 37 years of experience in cement manufacturing, having held leadership roles in R&D and product development at ACC Ltd. With deep expertise in innovative cement concepts, he is dedicated to sharing his knowledge and improving the performance of cement plants globally.

Continue Reading

Trending News