Economy & Market
Carbon Capture Systems
Published
4 months agoon
By
admin
Nathan Ashcroft, Director, Strategic Growth, Business Development, and Low Carbon Solutions – Stantec, explores the challenges and strategic considerations for cement industry as it strides towards Net Zero goals.
The cement industry does not need a reminder that it is among the most carbon-intensive sectors in the world. Roughly 7–8 per cent of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are tied to cement production. And unlike many other heavy industries, a large share of these emissions come not from fuel but from the process itself: the calcination of limestone. Efficiency gains, fuel switching, and renewable energy integration can reduce part of the footprint. But they cannot eliminate process emissions.
This is why carbon capture and storage (CCS) has become central to every serious discussion
about cement’s pathway to Net Zero. The industry already understands and accepts this challenge.
The debate is no longer whether CCS will be required—it is about how fast, affordable, and seamlessly it can be integrated into facilities that were never designed for it.
In many ways, CCS represents the ‘last mile’of cement decarbonisation. Once the sector achieves effective capture at scale, the most difficult part of its emissions profile will have been addressed. But getting there requires navigating a complex mix of technical, operational, financial and regulatory considerations.
A unique challenge for cement
Cement plants are built for durability and efficiency, not for future retrofits. Most were not designed with spare land for absorbers, ducting or compression units. Nor with the energy integration needs of capture systems in mind. Retrofitting CCS into these existing layouts presents a series of non-trivial challenges.
Reliability also weighs heavily in the discussion. Cement production runs continuously, and any disruption has significant economic consequences. A CCS retrofit typically requires tie-ins to stacks and gas flows that can only be completed during planned shutdowns. Even once operational, the capture system must demonstrate high availability. Otherwise, producers may face the dual cost of capture downtime and exposure to carbon taxes or penalties, depending on jurisdiction.
Despite these hurdles, cement may actually be better positioned than some other sectors. Flue gas from cement kilns typically has higher CO2 concentrations than gas-fired power plants, which improves capture efficiency. Plants also generate significant waste heat, which can be harnessed to offset the energy requirements of capture units. These advantages give the industry reason to be optimistic, provided integration strategies are carefully planned.
From acceptance to implementation
The cement sector has already acknowledged the inevitability of CCS. The next step is to turn acceptance into a roadmap for action. This involves a shift from general alignment around ‘the need’ toward project-level decisions about technology, layout, partnerships and financing.
The critical questions are no longer about chemistry or capture efficiency. They are about the following:
- Space and footprint: Where can capture units be located? And how can ducting be routed in crowded plants?
- Energy balance: How can capture loads be integrated without eroding plant efficiency?
- Downtime and risk: How will retrofits be staged to avoid prolonged shutdowns?
- Financing and incentives: How will capital-intensive projects be funded in a sector with
tight margins? - Policy certainty: Will governments provide the clarity and support needed for long-term investment
- Technology advancement: What are the latest developments?
- All of these considerations are now shaping the global CCS conversation in cement.
Economics: The central barrier
No discussion of CCS in the cement industry is complete without addressing cost. Capture systems are capital-intensive, with absorbers, regenerators, compressors, and associated balance-of-plant representing a significant investment. Operational costs are dominated by energy consumption, which adds further pressure in competitive markets.
For many producers, the economics may seem prohibitive. But the financial landscape is changing rapidly. Carbon pricing is becoming more widespread and will surely only increase in the future. This makes ‘doing nothing’ an increasingly expensive option. Government incentives—ranging from investment tax credits in North America to direct funding in Europe—are accelerating project viability. Some producers are exploring CO2 utilisation, whether in building materials, synthetic fuels, or industrial applications, as a way to offset costs. This is an area we will see significantly more work in the future.
Perhaps most importantly, the cost of CCS itself is coming down. Advances in novel technologies, solvents, modular system design, and integration strategies are reducing both capital requirements
and operating expenditures. What was once prohibitively expensive is now moving into the range of strategic possibility.
The regulatory and social dimension
CCS is not just a technical or financial challenge. It is also a regulatory and social one. Permitting requirements for capture units, pipelines, and storage sites are complex and vary by jurisdiction. Long-term monitoring obligations also add additional layers of responsibility.
Public trust also matters. Communities near storage sites or pipelines must be confident in the safety and environmental integrity of the system. The cement industry has the advantage of being widely recognised as a provider of essential infrastructure. If producers take a proactive role in transparent engagement and communication, they can help build public acceptance for CCS
more broadly.
Why now is different
The cement industry has seen waves of technology enthusiasm before. Some have matured, while others have faded. What makes CCS different today? The convergence of three forces:
1. Policy pressure: Net Zero commitments and tightening regulations are making CCS less of an option and more of an imperative.
2. Technology maturity: First-generation projects in power and chemicals have provided valuable lessons, reducing risks for new entrants.
3. Cost trajectory: Capture units are becoming smaller, smarter, and more affordable, while infrastructure investment is beginning to scale.
This convergence means CCS is shifting from concept to execution. Globally, projects are moving from pilot to commercial scale, and cement is poised to be among the beneficiaries of this momentum.
A global perspective
Our teams at Stantec recently completed a global scan of CCS technologies, and the findings are encouraging. Across solvents, membranes, and
hybrid systems, innovation pipelines are robust. Modular systems with reduced footprints are
emerging, specifically designed to make retrofits more practical.
Equally important, CCS hubs—where multiple emitters can share transport and storage infrastructure—are beginning to take shape in key regions. These hubs reduce costs, de-risk storage, and provide cement producers with practical pathways to integration.
The path forward
The cement industry has already accepted the challenge of carbon capture. What remains is charting a clear path to implementation. The barriers—space, cost, downtime, policy—are real. But they are not insurmountable. With costs trending downward, technology footprints shrinking, and policy support expanding, CCS is no longer a distant aspiration.
For cement producers, the decision is increasingly about timing and positioning. Those who move early can potentially secure advantages in incentives, stakeholder confidence, and long-term competitiveness. Those who delay may face higher costs and tighter compliance pressures.
Ultimately, the message is clear: CCS is coming to cement. The question is not if but how soon. And once it is integrated, the industry’s biggest challenge—process emissions—will finally have a solution.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Nathan Ashcroft, Director, Strategic Growth, Business Development, and Low Carbon Solutions – Stantec, holds expertise in project management, strategy, energy transition, and extensive international leadership experience.
SEEPEX introduces BN pumps with Smart Joint Access (SJA) to improve efficiency, reliability, and inspection speed in demanding rock blasting operations.
Designed for abrasive and chemical media, the solution supports precise dosing, reduced downtime, and enhanced operational safety.
SEEPEX has introduced BN pumps with Smart Joint Access (SJA), engineered for the reliable and precise transfer of abrasive, corrosive, and chemical media in mining and construction. Designed for rock blasting, the pump features a large inspection opening for quick joint checks, a compact footprint for mobile or skid-mounted installations, and flexible drive and material options for consistent performance and uptime.

“Operators can inspect joints quickly and rely on precise pumping of shear-sensitive and abrasive emulsions,” said Magalie Levray, Global Business Development Manager Mining at SEEPEX. “This is particularly critical in rock blasting, where every borehole counts for productivity.” Industry Context
Rock blasting is essential for extracting hard rock and shaping safe excavation profiles in mining and construction. Accurate and consistent loading of explosive emulsions ensures controlled fragmentation, protects personnel, and maximizes productivity. Even minor deviations in pumping can cause delays or reduce product quality. BN pumps with SJA support routine maintenance and pre-operation checks by allowing fast verification of joint integrity, enabling more efficient operations.
Always Inspection Ready
Smart Joint Access is designed for inspection-friendly operations. The large inspection opening in the suction housing provides direct access to both joints, enabling rapid pre-operation checks while maintaining high operational reliability. Technicians can assess joint condition quickly, supporting continuous, reliable operation.
Key Features
- Compact Footprint: Fits truck-mounted mobile units, skid-mounted systems, and factory installations.
- Flexible Drive Options: Compact hydraulic drive or electric drive configurations.
- Hydraulic Efficiency: Low-displacement design reduces oil requirements and supports low total cost of ownership.
- Equal Wall Stator Design: Ensures high-pressure performance in a compact footprint.
- Material Flexibility: Stainless steel or steel housings, chrome-plated rotors, and stators in NBR, EPDM, or FKM.
Operators benefit from shorter inspection cycles, reliable dosing, seamless integration, and fast delivery through framework agreements, helping to maintain uptime in critical rock blasting processes.
Applications – Optimized for Rock Blasting
BN pumps with SJA are designed for mining, tunneling, quarrying, civil works, dam construction, and other sectors requiring precise handling of abrasive or chemical media. They provide robust performance while enabling fast, reliable inspection and maintenance.With SJA, operators can quickly access both joints without disassembly, ensuring emulsions are transferred accurately and consistently. This reduces downtime, preserves product integrity, and supports uniform dosing across multiple bore holes.
With the Smart Joint Access inspection opening, operators can quickly access and assess the condition of both joints without disassembly, enabling immediate verification of pump readiness prior to blast hole loading. This allows operators to confirm that emulsions are transferred accurately and consistently, protecting personnel, minimizing product degradation, and maintaining uniform dosing across multiple bore holes.
The combination of equal wall stator design, compact integration, flexible drives, and progressive cavity pump technology ensures continuous, reliable operation even in space-limited, high-pressure environments.
From Inspection to Operation
A leading explosives provider implemented BN pumps with SJA in open pit and underground operations. By replacing legacy pumps, inspection cycles were significantly shortened, allowing crews to complete pre-operation checks and return mobile units to productive work faster. Direct joint access through SJA enabled immediate verification, consistent emulsion dosing, and reduced downtime caused by joint-related deviations.
“The inspection opening gives immediate confidence that each joint is secure before proceeding to bore holes,” said a site technician. “It allows us to act quickly, keeping blasting schedules on track.”
Framework agreements ensured rapid pump supply and minimal downtime, supporting multi-site operations across continents
Concrete
Digital process control is transforming grinding
Published
2 weeks agoon
February 20, 2026By
admin
Satish Maheshwari, Chief Manufacturing Officer, Shree Cement, delves into how digital intelligence is transforming cement grinding into a predictive, stable, and energy-efficient operation.
Grinding sits at the heart of cement manufacturing, accounting for the largest share of electrical energy consumption. In this interview, Satish Maheshwari, Chief Manufacturing Officer, Shree Cement, explains how advanced grinding technologies, data-driven optimisation and process intelligence are transforming mill performance, reducing power consumption and supporting the industry’s decarbonisation goals.
How has the grinding process evolved in Indian cement plants to meet rising efficiency and sustainability expectations?
Over the past decade, Indian cement plants have seen a clear evolution in grinding technology, moving from conventional open-circuit ball mills to high-efficiency closed-circuit systems, Roller Press–Ball Mill combinations and Vertical Roller Mills (VRMs). This shift has been supported by advances in separator design, improved wear-resistant materials, and the growing use of digital process automation. As a result, grinding units today operate as highly controlled manufacturing systems where real-time data, process intelligence and efficient separation work together to deliver stable and predictable performance.
From a sustainability perspective, these developments directly reduce specific power consumption, improve equipment reliability and lower the carbon footprint per tonne of cement produced.
How critical is grinding optimisation in reducing specific power consumption across ball mills and VRMs?
Grinding is the largest consumer of electrical energy in a cement plant, which makes optimisation one of the most effective levers for improving energy efficiency. In ball mill systems, optimisation through correct media selection, charge design, diaphragm configuration, ventilation management and separator tuning can typically deliver power savings of 5 per cent to 8 per cent. In VRMs, fine-tuning airflow balance, grinding pressure, nozzle ring settings, and circulating load can unlock energy reductions in the range of 8 per cent to 12 per cent. Across both systems, sustained operation under stable conditions is critical. Consistency in mill loading and operating parameters improves quality control, reduces wear, and enables long-term energy efficiency, making stability a key operational KPI.
What challenges arise in maintaining consistent cement quality when using alternative raw materials and blended compositions?
The increased use of alternative raw materials and supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) introduces variability in chemistry, moisture, hardness, and loss on ignition. This variability makes it more challenging to maintain consistent fineness, particle size distribution, throughput and downstream performance parameters such as setting time, strength development and workability.
As clinker substitution levels rise, grinding precision becomes increasingly important. Even small improvements in consistency enable higher SCM utilisation without compromising cement performance.
Addressing these challenges requires stronger feed homogenisation, real-time quality monitoring and dynamic adjustment of grinding parameters so that output quality remains stable despite changing input characteristics.
How is digital process control changing the way grinding performance is optimised?
Digital process control is transforming grinding from an operator-dependent activity into a predictive, model-driven operation. Technologies such as online particle size and residue analysers, AI-based optimisation platforms, digital twins for VRMs and Roller Press systems, and advanced process control solutions are redefining how performance is managed.
At the same time, workforce roles are evolving. Operators are increasingly focused on interpreting data trends through digital dashboards and responding proactively rather than relying on manual interventions. Together, these tools improve mill stability, enable faster response to disturbances, maintain consistent fineness, and reduce specific energy consumption while minimising manual effort.
How do you see grinding technologies supporting the industry’s low-clinker and decarbonisation goals?
Modern grinding technologies are central to the industry’s decarbonisation efforts. They enable higher incorporation of SCMs such as fly ash, slag, and limestone, improve particle fineness and reactivity, and reduce overall power consumption. Efficient grinding makes it possible to maintain consistent cement quality at lower clinker factors. Every improvement in energy intensity and particle engineering directly contributes to lower CO2 emissions.
As India moves toward low-carbon construction, precision grinding will remain a foundational capability for delivering sustainable, high-performance cement aligned with national and global climate objectives.
How much potential does grinding optimisation hold for immediate energy
and cost savings?
The potential for near-term savings is substantial. Without major capital investment, most plants can achieve 5 per cent to 15 per cent power reduction through measures such as improving separator efficiency, optimising ventilation, refining media grading, and fine-tuning operating parameters.
With continued capacity expansion across India, advanced optimisation tools will help ensure that productivity gains are not matched by proportional increases in energy demand. Given current power costs, this translates into direct and measurable financial benefits, making grinding optimisation one of the fastest-payback operational initiatives available to cement manufacturers today.
Concrete
Refractory demands in our kiln have changed
Published
3 weeks agoon
February 20, 2026By
admin
Radha Singh, Senior Manager (P&Q), Shree Digvijay Cement, points out why performance, predictability and life-cycle value now matter more than routine replacement in cement kilns.
As Indian cement plants push for higher throughput, increased alternative fuel usage and tighter shutdown cycles, refractory performance in kilns and pyro-processing systems is under growing pressure. In this interview, Radha Singh, Senior Manager (P&Q), Shree Digvijay Cement, shares how refractory demands have evolved on the ground and how smarter digital monitoring is improving kiln stability, uptime and clinker quality.
How have refractory demands changed in your kiln and pyro-processing line over the last five years?
Over the last five years, refractory demands in our kiln and pyro line have changed. Earlier, the focus was mostly on standard grades and routine shutdown-based replacement. But now, because of higher production loads, more alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR) usage and greater temperature variation, the expectation from refractory has increased.
In our own case, the current kiln refractory has already completed around 1.5 years, which itself shows how much more we now rely on materials that can handle thermal shock, alkali attack and coating fluctuations. We have moved towards more stable, high-performance linings so that we don’t have to enter the kiln frequently for repairs.
Overall, the shift has been from just ‘installation and run’ to selecting refractories that give longer life, better coating behaviour and more predictable performance under tougher operating conditions.
What are the biggest refractory challenges in the preheater, calciner and cooler zones?
• Preheater: Coating instability, chloride/sulphur cycles and brick erosion.
• Calciner: AFR firing, thermal shock and alkali infiltration.
• Cooler: Severe abrasion, red-river formation and mechanical stress on linings.
Overall, the biggest challenge is maintaining lining stability under highly variable operating conditions.
How do you evaluate and select refractory partners for long-term performance?
In real plant conditions, we don’t select a refractory partner just by looking at price. First, we see their past performance in similar kilns and whether their material has actually survived our operating conditions. We also check how strong their technical support is during shutdowns, because installation quality matters as much as the material itself.
Another key point is how quickly they respond during breakdowns or hot spots. A good partner should be available on short notice. We also look at their failure analysis capability, whether they can explain why a lining failed and suggest improvements.
On top of this, we review the life they delivered in the last few campaigns, their supply reliability and their willingness to offer plant-specific custom solutions instead of generic grades. Only a partner who supports us throughout the life cycle, which includes selection, installation, monitoring and post-failure analysis, fits our long-term requirement.
Can you share a recent example where better refractory selection improved uptime or clinker quality?
Recently, we upgraded to a high-abrasion basic brick at the kiln outlet. Earlier we had frequent chipping and coating loss. With the new lining, thermal stability improved and the coating became much more stable. As a result, our shutdown interval increased and clinker quality remained more consistent. It had a direct impact on our uptime.
How is increased AFR use affecting refractory behaviour?
Increased AFR use is definitely putting more stress on the refractory. The biggest issue we see daily is the rise in chlorine, alkalis and volatiles, which directly attack the lining, especially in the calciner and kiln inlet. AFR firing is also not as stable as conventional fuel, so we face frequent temperature fluctuations, which cause more thermal shock and small cracks in the lining.
Another real problem is coating instability. Some days the coating builds too fast, other days it suddenly drops, and both conditions impact refractory life. We also notice more dust circulation and buildup inside the calciner whenever the AFR mix changes, which again increases erosion.
Because of these practical issues, we have started relying more on alkali-resistant, low-porosity and better thermal shock–resistant materials to handle the additional stress coming from AFR.
What role does digital monitoring or thermal profiling play in your refractory strategy?
Digital tools like kiln shell scanners, IR imaging and thermal profiling help us detect weakening areas much earlier. This reduces unplanned shutdowns, helps identify hotspots accurately and allows us to replace only the critical sections. Overall, our maintenance has shifted from reactive to predictive, improving lining life significantly.
How do you balance cost, durability and installation speed during refractory shutdowns?
We focus on three points:
• Material quality that suits our thermal profile and chemistry.
• Installation speed, in fast turnarounds, we prefer monolithic.
• Life-cycle cost—the cheapest material is not the most economical. We look at durability, future downtime and total cost of ownership.
This balance ensures reliable performance without unnecessary expenditure.
What refractory or pyro-processing innovations could transform Indian cement operations?
Some promising developments include:
• High-performance, low-porosity and nano-bonded refractories
• Precast modular linings to drastically reduce shutdown time
• AI-driven kiln thermal analytics
• Advanced coating management solutions
• More AFR-compatible refractory mixes
These innovations can significantly improve kiln stability, efficiency and maintenance planning across the industry.
Merlin Prime Spaces Acquires 13,185 Sq M Land Parcel In Pune
Adani Cement and Naredco Partner to Promote Sustainable Construction
Operational Excellence Redefined!
World Cement Association Annual Conference 2026 in Bangkok
Assam Chief Minister Opens Star Cement Plant In Cachar
Merlin Prime Spaces Acquires 13,185 Sq M Land Parcel In Pune
Adani Cement and Naredco Partner to Promote Sustainable Construction
Operational Excellence Redefined!
World Cement Association Annual Conference 2026 in Bangkok


