Connect with us

Concrete

Structural Shift in the Cost Curve

Published

on

Shares

The cost curve in the Indian cement industry has been on an upward trajectory. ICR delves into the causes behind it and its impact while endeavouring to answer the important question – how much of this is permanent?

If the financial year 2022 was the year of shipping costs soaring to the highest level, the financial year 2023 started with the coal and pet coke prices moving to the stratosphere in tandem, largely buoyed by the geo-political headwinds with the war in Ukraine, forcing a sanction of a large part of the oil, gas and coal from the Russian sources to the Western world. The fallout of this was a steep hardening of the coal futures, both New Castle and API4 Indexes shot up to the extreme levels it has never seen in the past. While these
were FOB prices, the shipping freight, albeit softening from the stratospheric levels, were still high by any standard.
The Indian cement industry was hugely impacted by the rise in power and fuel prices as this contributes to 30 per cent of the industry cost of producing and distributing cement, the logistics cost still remaining high at 40 per cent of the total costs. The first quarter of FY2023 saw an across the industry rise of above 60 per cent in the power and fuel cost as attached in the graph below (compiled from the quarterly reports of the key industry players).

Market Dynamics
This rise has however cooled down in the recent quarter, but a large part of the rise seems to be permanent and the total shift in the industry cost curve is expected to be 20 per cent higher on power and fuel cost together with the impact of logistics cost. How do we explain this structural shift in cost?
While most of the analysis is based on the spot prices of coal, both in the international and domestic market, which in turn influences the prices of pet coke as well, the private buyers of coal and pet coke do not trade on spot basis for the bulk of their portfolio, which is built on an optimised model for buying a mix of domestic coal (linkage auction, e-auction and market coal), imported coal (RB1,2,3, Indonesian, other sources, etc), domestic pet coke (Nyara, Reliance, IOCL, etc), imported pet coke (U.S. East Coast, Oman, LATAM, etc), such that the landed cost could be minimised on the basis of rupee per kcal (heat value) as the portfolio must be normalised over the range of GCV options.
Private sellers and buyers have experienced in their own way through tenured contracts that inter-dependence in a highly volatile market did demonstrate better results over the long run, but in the short term both sides have engaged in short term opportunism. This has put additional strains in the system and these postures have influenced the spot prices. While the FOB prices started to show distinct ‘out of bound’ movement, the shipping costs remained high throughout this period and only recently have shown a definitive downward trend.
The individual cement players within the industry have very different portfolio of their own, built through the years on an optimisation programme that takes into account the kiln characteristics as well, in accepting a mix of coal or/and pet coke from a myriad of sources, where logistics cost becomes a very dominant factor; with shipping costs soaring, the negative results have been more pronounced for those who have an over-exposure to importation.
One of the important points to be noted is that the Indian coal prices have also gone up by 75 per cent on an average across a range of grades, those who have long term auction linkages still alive, are the outliers benefitting the most. The future direction of the domestic coal prices does not seem to portray a large change as most of the mines have a rising cost to contend with, as stripping ratios continue to rise every year, followed by logistics cost.

Taking on Challenges
The question of power and fuel cost rise should be seen in the long term rather than in the short term, although finding the most optimised mix in terms of cost has remained the area of focus all along. Two of the biggest challenges that urgently require solutions from the industry are as follows:

  1. Cement industry cannot continue to increase the use of fossil fuel in the mix of inputs: Apart from the emission issue that weighs on the situation (potential abatement costs included), the economics of higher fuel usage weighs far more menacingly on the cost curve. As every linkage auction quantity allocated to the cement industry has been steadily going down, it is expected that the prices will be moving up. The overall allocation still remains highly skewed to the power sector (where cement CPPs also become strong contenders), the overall situation after factoring in logistics issues still show that the domestic coal cost per MW of output has been rising steadily.
  2. Captive coal mines have remained a challenge in terms of overall cost: The only solution for the long term is to look for captive coal mines that have logistics advantages and where the costs over the long term can be found as a viable option when compared with other sources of coal or pet coke. But the actual progress on the ground is low due to the challenges of stripping ratios for the mines that are on offer.
  3. Pet coke prices have reasons for moving up: The US refineries have stopped all further investments and the portfolio is also getting transformed as far as their waste outputs are concerned. In the hierarchy of waste outputs, the total cost including the future abatement costs are increasingly being considered. In this regard, pet coke costs are likely to almost double if these considerations are factored in.
    The structural shift of power and fuel price hypothesis can be tested in the next two quarters when the India cement industry would showcase their alternate hypothesis (use of Russian coal, Venezuelan pet coke). But the rise would still be significant over the long-term power and fuel prices that the industry witnessed, which used to hover around Rs 1000/T. Today, this is around Rs 1700/T for the industry, a shift which has happened in just two years’ time.
    The question then shifts to whether the industry could create a structural pass-through of these costs in prices. With the current trajectory of prices, it does not seem to be happening. However, the industry is moving through a spate of consolidations and the recent entry of Adani could change the picture further. Its strong network advantages stemming from logistics consolidation across the entire geography of India could be a strong contender to challenge the current hypothesis.

– Procyon Mukherjee

Concrete

Jefferies’ Optimism Fuels Cement Stock Rally

The industry is aiming price hikes of Rs 10-15 per bag in December.

Published

on

By

Shares



Cement stocks surged over 5% on Monday, driven by Jefferies’ positive outlook on demand recovery, supported by increased government capital expenditure and favourable price trends.

JK Cement led the rally with a 5.3% jump, while UltraTech Cement rose 3.82%, making it the top performer on the Nifty 50. Dalmia Bharat and Grasim Industries gained over 3% each, with Shree Cement and Ambuja Cement adding 2.77% and 1.32%, respectively.

“Cement stocks have been consolidating without significant upward movement for over a year,” noted Vikas Jain, head of research at Reliance Securities. “The Jefferies report with positive price feedback prompted a revaluation of these stocks today.”

According to Jefferies, cement prices were stable in November, with earlier declines bottoming out. The industry is now targeting price hikes of Rs 10-15 per bag in December.

The brokerage highlighted moderate demand growth in October and November, with recovery expected to strengthen in the fourth quarter, supported by a revival in government infrastructure spending.
Analysts are optimistic about a stronger recovery in the latter half of FY25, driven by anticipated increases in government investments in infrastructure projects.
(ET)

Continue Reading

Concrete

Steel Ministry Proposes 25% Safeguard Duty on Steel Imports

The duty aims to counter the impact of rising low-cost steel imports.

Published

on

By

Shares



The Ministry of Steel has proposed a 25% safeguard duty on certain steel imports to address concerns raised by domestic producers. The proposal emerged during a meeting between Union Steel Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy and Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal in New Delhi, attended by senior officials and executives from leading steel companies like SAIL, Tata Steel, JSW Steel, and AMNS India.

Following the meeting, Goyal highlighted on X the importance of steel and metallurgical coke industries in India’s development, emphasising discussions on boosting production, improving quality, and enhancing global competitiveness. Kumaraswamy echoed the sentiment, pledging collaboration between ministries to create a business-friendly environment for domestic steelmakers.

The safeguard duty proposal aims to counter the impact of rising low-cost steel imports, particularly from free trade agreement (FTA) nations. Steel Secretary Sandeep Poundrik noted that 62% of steel imports currently enter at zero duty under FTAs, with imports rising to 5.51 million tonnes (MT) during April-September 2024-25, compared to 3.66 MT in the same period last year. Imports from China surged significantly, reaching 1.85 MT, up from 1.02 MT a year ago.

Industry experts, including think tank GTRI, have raised concerns about FTAs, highlighting cases where foreign producers partner with Indian firms to re-import steel at concessional rates. GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava also pointed to challenges like port delays and regulatory hurdles, which strain over 10,000 steel user units in India.

The government’s proposal reflects its commitment to supporting the domestic steel industry while addressing trade imbalances and promoting a self-reliant manufacturing sector.

(ET)

Continue Reading

Concrete

India Imposes Anti-Dumping Duty on Solar Panel Aluminium Frames

Move boosts domestic aluminium industry, curbs low-cost imports

Published

on

By

Shares



The Indian government has introduced anti-dumping duties on anodized aluminium frames for solar panels and modules imported from China, a move hailed by the Aluminium Association of India (AAI) as a significant step toward fostering a self-reliant aluminium sector.

The duties, effective for five years, aim to counter the influx of low-cost imports that have hindered domestic manufacturing. According to the Ministry of Finance, Chinese dumping has limited India’s ability to develop local production capabilities.

Ahead of Budget 2025, the aluminium industry has urged the government to introduce stronger trade protections. Key demands include raising import duties on primary and downstream aluminium products from 7.5% to 10% and imposing a uniform 7.5% duty on aluminium scrap to curb the influx of low-quality imports.

India’s heavy reliance on aluminium imports, which now account for 54% of the country’s demand, has resulted in an annual foreign exchange outflow of Rupees 562.91 billion. Scrap imports, doubling over the last decade, have surged to 1,825 KT in FY25, primarily sourced from China, the Middle East, the US, and the UK.

The AAI noted that while advanced economies like the US and China impose strict tariffs and restrictions to protect their aluminium industries, India has become the largest importer of aluminium scrap globally. This trend undermines local producers, who are urging robust measures to enhance the domestic aluminium ecosystem.

With India’s aluminium demand projected to reach 10 million tonnes by 2030, industry leaders emphasize the need for stronger policies to support local production and drive investments in capacity expansion. The anti-dumping duties on solar panel components, they say, are a vital first step in building a sustainable and competitive aluminium sector.

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds