Connect with us

Concrete

Emissions Alert!

Published

on

Shares

Rapid urbanisation, rise of smart cities and massive infrastructure development are on the cards for India, leading to an unprecedented rise in demand for cement, the manufacturing of which comes with high carbon emissions. The industry cannot march towards profitability without giving due consideration to the environment. ICR delves into different aspects of the production process, particularly the use of alternative fuels, in a bid to understand how companies can lower carbon emissions and make substantial contributions to the nation’s efforts of achieving Net Zero target.

Environmental concerns have been rising over the period of time now. It has become one of the most talked about issues in the nation. According to the 2021 World Air Quality Report, India is home to 63 of the 100 most polluted cities. The study has also found that PM2.5 concentrations – tiny particles in the air that are 2.5 micrometres or smaller in length – in 48 per cent of the country’s cities are more than 10 times higher than the 2021 WHO air quality guideline level.
Vehicular emissions, industrial waste, smoke from cooking, the construction sector, crop burning, and power generation are among the biggest sources of air pollution in India. The country’s dependence on coal, oil, and gas due to rampant electrification makes it the world’s third-largest polluter, contributing over 2.65 billion metric tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere every year.
The primary driver to global climatic change is carbon and Greenhouse Gas emission from various industries of the world. To save the planet from the harmful effects of this emission, the world collaboratively needs to take strides in the direction of achieving a Net Zero environment. To tackle the issue of carbon emission across the globe, it is important to understand where it is coming from. From industry to country, breaking down the problem into smaller sections is likely to bring a solution at large.
Cement is made from calcined lime and clay and serves to bind materials via chemical means. It can be hydraulic or non-hydraulic. The hydraulic type is sticky with water because of the chemical reaction of the dry powder with water. It is safer to use in water due to its solubility and hardening property. Hydraulic cements set in wet condition and protect the applied surface against chemical attacks. An example of this type of cement is the Portland cement. The non-hydraulic types (gypsum, lime and oxychloride) do not harden with water. They are therefore vulnerable to chemicals and are not reliable as the hydraulic types which are commonly used. The non-hydraulic cements are used in dry conditions for brick, mortar and stonework.
Concrete is the most consumed man-made material in existence. Cement, the key ingredient of concrete, also leaves a massive carbon footprint behind it. It contributes to emitting 8 per cent of carbon emission of the total world’s emission. The cement industry in India is one of the eight core industries in the country. According to a report published by Statista in February 2022, the production of cement in the fiscal year 2022-23 is expected to increase by 28.3 per cent. While this is a definitive indication of growth of the industry in the country as a resultant of increased demand, leading to more infrastructure and urbanisation, it is also indicative of higher emission from the cement manufacturing process.
Cement is a key component in the development of the nation, as an industry and as a material used for building the infrastructure and promoting urbanisation. However, this poses an adverse effect to the environment in the form of emission of pollutants. The pollutants are in the form of gas, liquid and solid. Thus, it becomes important to understand the impact of this industry on the environment and what is required to control it.
The core pollutants from this industry are carbon oxides, nitrogen oxides, sulphur oxide and grey dust. These lead to poor air quality and impact the health of humans, animals and plantations around the manufacturing units. The wastes and emissions from the industry also lead to water pollution.
Environmental pollution is the addition of unwanted chemical or biological materials to the earth, thereby affecting the normality of the ecosystem or environment as a whole. So, pollutants from the cement industry lead to air pollution during combustion of raw materials forming clinkers or quarrying processes. The gaseous pollutant released, pollutes the air to impair the air quality. Water is polluted during the discharge of organic sludge or leakages, which come in contact with water bodies, hence killing plants and animals in waters. Environmental pollution from the cement industry, from the feeding to the refining processes, distorts the ecosystem. Hence, these processes need to be properly controlled and managed to minimise the emission of pollutants to the environment.

Types of Pollutants
A review paper by the Mechanical Engineering for Society and Industry, January 2022, in its study shares that the pollutants from the cement industry can be classified in terms of solid, liquid or gaseous, causing soil, water, air or noise pollution.
Solid pollutants include wastes from clinker production or materials that do not meet standards and are discarded. Some of the examples include, spoil rocks, fly ash or kiln ash, plastics, coke and metal scraps. Noise pollution in the cement industry is created from air flow and machineries used in the process of cement production. Noise from air flow is as a result of air at speed of 15 to 20 metre per second moving through chimneys, tubes or ducts. Noise from machinery comes from process equipment like fans, compressors, heaters, pumps, crushers, kilns etc. Though the cement industry rarely releases liquid pollutants, these are seen as effluents from the manufacturing process.
Gaseous pollutants include particulate matter, nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulphur oxides (SOX), carbon oxides (CO and CO2), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), dioxin and furan and metals with their compounds. Activities such as quarrying, hauling, crushing, grinding of raw material and clinker, fuel preparation, clinker grinding and cement packing in the cement manufacturing process result in the emission of particulate matter to the atmosphere. Particulate matter consists of fine particles that can remain suspended in the air which include dust, soot and liquid droplets. During calcination of limestone, CaCO3, carbon (IV) oxide is released with calcium oxide as a product. Burning of fuel in kilns leaves carbon (IV) oxide as a by-product. The carbon is emitted from the decarbonisation of raw materials and from combustion of fuels.
Other gaseous pollutants like Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are obtained from partial combustion and organic matter in the raw materials for cement production. Nitrogen oxides are obtained when combustion flames from the rotary kilns react with the gases in the atmosphere. Thermal oxidation occurs between 1200oC to 1600oC. Sulphur oxides come as a result of burning of fuels which contain sulphur and oxidation of sulphur present in the raw materials. Sulphur in raw materials is oxidised to form SO2 and SO3 at the heating point between 370oC and 420oC in the kiln preheater. SO2 is formed by thermal decomposition of calcium sulphate in the clinker. SO3 is quickly decomposed to SO2 and O2.
These pollutants cause various harms to the environment. The particle matter reduces visibility of the air. Water bodies become contaminated when the matter in dust particles get washed in them. VOCs degrade the soil and groundwater. The release of carbon dioxide results in increased temperature, thus, disturbing the climatic patterns of the planet. The nitrogen oxides are acidic in nature and can cause harm to health if breathed in large volume or with prolonged exposure. The sulphur oxides cause acid rain when it reacts with water vapour and chemicals in the atmosphere in the presence of sunlight.
The combination of this reaction forms sulphuric acids which come in the form of rain to damage lives and properties.
This study concludes that proper control and management is needed to minimise the emission of pollutants to the environment. This can be achieved through the following:

  • The device that separates dusts as pollutants with a higher efficiency should be maintained to get a rather cleaner gas released to the atmosphere.
  • An environmental inspection body should investigate the cement industries to examine the number of pollutants emitted, the type of machinery used, and ways of waste disposal. This should be done to reduce the pollutants released and maintain high quality operations in the industry.
  • More research should be carried out to investigate the separation process in the cement industry. Separation processes like the gas-solid to give the right models for designing more separation equipment.

Dr Hitesh Sukhwal, Deputy General Manager – Environment, Udaipur Cement Works Limited (UCWL), says, “We are working in different ways for environmental aspects. If we talk about air pollution in operation, every section of the operational unit is well equipped with state-of-the-art technology-based air pollution control equipment (BagHouse and ESP) to mitigate the dust pollution beyond the compliance standard. We use high class standard PTFE glass fibre filter bags in our bag houses. UCWL has installed the DeNOx system (SNCR) for abatement of NOx pollution within norms. The company has installed a 6 MW capacity Waste Heat Recovery based power plant that utilises waste heat of kiln i.e., green and clean energy source. Also, installed a 14.6 MW capacity solar power system in the form of a renewable energy source.”
“All material transfer points are equipped with a dust extraction system. Material is stored under a covered shed to avoid secondary fugitive dust emission sources. Finished product is being stored in silos. Water spraying system mounted with material handling point. Road vacuum sweeping machine deployed for housekeeping of paved area,” he adds.

Conservation through Use of Alternatives
Fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum and natural gas provide most of the energy needs of the world today. Coal and natural gas are used in their natural forms, but petroleum and other fossil fuels such as shale and bituminous sands require distillation and refinement to give usable fuels. These fuels exist in any of the following forms: solid, liquid and gas.The finite nature of global fossil fuel resources, high prices and most importantly, their damaging effect on the environment underscore the need to develop alternative fuels. Alternative fuels here refer to fuels that can be used instead of conventional fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas.
Cement production is an energy-intensive process consuming thermal energy of the order of 3.3 GJ/tonne of clinker produced. Electrical energy consumption is about 90-120 kWh/tonne of cement. Historically, the primary fuel used in the cement industry is coal. A wide range of other fuels such as gas, oil, liquid waste materials, solid waste materials and petroleum coke have all been successfully used as sources of energy for firing cement-making kilns, either on their own or in various combinations.

The Indian cement sector has been at the forefront in responding to climate change. including using alternative fuel
sources and raw materials and in disposing of the waste residue.


As India is part of the Paris Agreement and has aligned itself with its goal of achieving Net Zero by 2070 as announced in the Glasgow Climate Summit, it is in the race to achieve carbon neutrality by the said deadline.
Thus, the industry has turned its focus on the use of alternative fuels and raw materials for the cement manufacturing process. This use of alternatives in the manufacturing process not only has significant ecological benefits of conserving non-renewable resources, the reduction of waste disposal requirements and reduction of emissions, but is also of an economic benefit for the industry.
Use of low-grade alternative fuels such as waste coal, tyres, sewage sludge, and biomass fuels (such as wood products, agricultural wastes, etc.) in precalciners is a viable option because combustion in a precalciner vessel takes place at a lower temperature. These alternatives are also cheaper economically and contribute towards a lower carbon emission rate. Similarly, use of industrial wastes, municipal wastes, and other wastes as fuel in the cement manufacturing process have multiple benefits. It supports the circular economy of the nation, helps reduce waste from the environment, prevents landfills and water body pollution and supports the profitability of the manufacturing process.
Ganesh W Jirkuntwar, Senior Executive Director & National Manufacturing Head, Dalmia Cement (Bharat), says, “By using environmentally friendly fuel and raw materials, we have managed to create an impact on our triple bottom line: social, environmental as well as financial performance.
A proper strategy for selection and adopting environment-friendly initiatives that act as fuel and raw materials is expected to significantly boost the organisation’s profitability.”
Large volumes of legacy municipal waste are available at various municipal dump sites, that can be converted to Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) and can be used by Indian cement Industries. Cement industries are currently facing a tough time due to the steep rise in fuel prices. The usage of RDF and other alternative fuels will help the cement industry in optimising its fuel cost,” he adds.

Reverse calcination can sequester up to 5 per cent of cement’s emissions, which with advancement of technology could
be extended to 30 per cent.

Technology for Carbon Reduction
The growth in housing and infrastructure in India is expected to grow in the coming years, with over 250 million people estimated to be added to its urban population in the next 20 years. This translates into a massive and sustained demand for building materials such as cement – an industrial sector with high carbon emissions. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), in a recent report, has advocated technological intervention to address these carbon emissions from the cement industry, which in turn will help achieve India’s Net Zero emission targets.
A recent bulletin by RBI mentions that India is aiming to reach half of its energy requirements from renewables and reduce the economy’s carbon intensity by 45 per cent by 2030. The central bank authority of India on this account necessitates a policy relook across sectors, especially where carbon emission is high.
The RBI report noted that India’s cement production is expected to reach 381 million tonnes by 2021-22 while the consumption may likely be around 379 million tonnes. It highlighted that a renewed focus on big infrastructure projects like the National Infrastructure Pipeline, low-cost housing (Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana), and the government’s push for the smart cities mission is likely to drive demand for the cement in future.
The India Energy Outlook 2021 suggests that even at a relatively modest assumed urbanisation rate, approximately 270 million people are still set to be added to India’s urban population by 2040. This shall underpin a massive increase in total residential floor space from less than 20 billion square metres, at present, to more than 50 billion in 20 years and this would translate into demand for cement becoming more than double by 2040.
Given this future scenario, the RBI has recommended that there is a need to align India’s economic goal with its climate commitments by implementing emerging green tech solutions. It explained that a significant amount of CO2 emissions in cement making result from calcination, while the rest comes from burning coal and other fossil fuels.
RBI notes that capturing the CO2 emissions before it enters the atmosphere and storing it away through reverse calcination is the most effective approach to decarbonise the cement industry. Reverse calcination could sequester up to five per cent of cement’s emissions at present, which could be extended to 30 per cent with the improvement in technology. This process can be further enhanced by employing green energy instead of fossil fuels to perform the process of calcination.
India, along with the world, needs to fast-track the journey to zero-carbon. The energy used to heat the kilns that produce the clinker and the chemical processes that convert limestone into calcium oxide are the major causes of these emissions. However, the Indian cement sector has been at the forefront in responding to climate change.
Technologies like Waste Heat Recovery (WHR) power generation systems, reducing or ceasing the use of fossil fuels, using solar energy, as well as converting current fossil-fuel-based facilities into renewable biomass fuel-based units, are being used by various companies to reduce the emissions during cement production. As the need for energy is paramount in the cement industry, the solution to its emission issues lies in finding renewable electricity that can produce clean, safe, affordable, and infinite energy.
Jim O’Brien, CSR Consultant and Convenor of Global Aggregates Information Network (GAIN), says, “The extensive investment in waste heat recovery systems, plus the move to renewable energy, in particular through solar installations, all of which help to reduce Scope 2 CO2 emissions.”
“Automation is clearly key to optimising all processes both within and beyond the cement plant, and the latter can help in reducing Scope 3 transport emissions of both incoming raw materials and outgoing products,” he adds.

The cement industry contributes to 8 per cent of the
global carbon emission.

Transition to Net Zero
According to an article published by McKinsey & Company in April 2022, as the world will move towards a Net Zero scenario in 2050, capital spending on equipment and infrastructure with relatively low emissions intensity would average $6.5 trillion a year—more than two-thirds of the $9.2 trillion in annual capital spending during that time. During the Net Zero transition, energy systems of the world and its machinery will be re-engineered to utilise renewable fuels instead of fossil fuels.
McKinsey’s analysis of the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) Net Zero 2050 scenario suggests that the annual spending on low-emissions assets and the infrastructure to enable them would rise to about $3.5 trillion than today.
Innovation needs to be accelerated, not only to accommodate renewable fuels, but also to transport the energy produced by them from creator to user. In the long haul, larger sunny terrains must be able to send the produced solar energy to lesser sunny terrains for renewable energy consumption.
To boost the awareness about and usage of green cement, among the various global initiatives, the governments of the United Kingdom, India, Germany, the United Arab Emirates, and Canada, under the new Industrial Deep Decarbonisation Initiative (IDDI), announced a pledge with intentions to buy low-carbon steel and concrete from the heavy industries if they are made, in November 2021. They made their intentions clear at the UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, with specific interim targets by 2030 expected to be revealed at the next meeting of the Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM) by mid-2022. As the public procurement of steel and cement in these five countries represents 25 per cent to 40 per cent of the domestic market for such materials, this announcement is a huge step towards sustainability.
Manoj Rustagi, EVP – Sustainability & Innovation, Capex Projects, JSW Cement, was quoted in an interview in March 2022 that JSW Cement has a disruptive business model in the building materials space. Though they face resistance to selling innovative low-carbon products, JSW management is committed to promoting its sustainable product mix in the larger good for the country. The company is hopeful that in the near future public procurement shall embrace and encourage low carbon products and lead by example.
The need for cement is sure to increase in the coming years and decades. Technology and automation are paving the way for innovative methods of cement production. As this demand for cement manufacturing is increasing, it is of paramount importance that its impact on the environment is investigated and solutions are given for the same.
Carbon emission is one of the key factors identified that is causing harm to the environment. The solution to this emission lies in finding alternative solutions that can help produce safer, clear, greener and yet affordable cement for the future urbanisation and development of the nation. Across the globe and in India, companies are in the process of changing their manufacturing techniques to transition to clean energy and reduce their carbon footprint. The future also holds cement that supports zero carbon emission.
The protection of the environment and reduction of emission by the cement industry comes with its own set of challenges. However, every player of the Indian cement industry has taken up the mission to conserve and protect its nation’s environment and make cement manufacturing a sustainable and eco-friendly process.

-Kanika Mathur

Concrete

Green Construction Through Cement Innovation

Published

on

By

Shares

Indian Cement Review (ICR) and Fuller Technologies brought industry, policy and technology leaders together to discuss how cement innovation can drive green construction at scale, writes Rakesh Rao.

India is building at a pace few countries can match. Highways, airports, housing, logistics parks, industrial corridors and urban infrastructure are reshaping the country’s economic geography. But beneath this growth story lies a difficult question: can India continue to build at scale without locking itself into a high-carbon future?

That question formed the core of an online panel discussion titled “Driving Green Construction Through Cement Innovation”, organised by Indian Cement Review (ICR) in association with Fuller Technologies as the Presenting Partner on June 25, 2026. The webinar brought together experts from cement technology, R&D, global industry platforms, building performance policy and international development cooperation to examine how low-carbon cement and material innovation can accelerate India’s green construction transition.

The discussion came at a crucial time. India has committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2070 and reducing the carbon intensity of its economy by 45 per cent by 2030. At the same time, the country’s construction sector is expanding rapidly, driven by urbanisation, infrastructure development, housing demand and industrial growth. Cement, as one of the most widely used construction materials, sits at the heart of this transition. It is indispensable to development, but also central to the challenge of reducing embodied carbon in buildings and infrastructure.

Moderated by Nitika Krishan, Senior Urban Infrastructure and Sustainable Policy Consultant, the panel featured:

  • Kiranmai Sanagavarapu, Director, Low Carbon Solutions, Fuller Technologies;
  • Dr Hemantkumar Aiyer, VP and Head R&D, Nuvoco Vistas Corp Ltd;
  • Devika Wattal, Innovation Lead, Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA);
  • Dr Sunita Purushottam, MD, GBPN India (Global Buildings Performance Network); and
  • Vaibhav Rathi, Senior Technical Advisor, GIZ (the German Agency for International Cooperation)

Setting the tone for the discussion, Nitika Krishan underlined the scale of the challenge before the sector. “The question before us is no longer whether we build, but how we build sustainably,” she said. She pointed out that construction accounts for nearly 40 per cent of global energy-related carbon emissions when both operational and embodied carbon are considered. Cement production, she added, remains one of the hardest industrial processes to decarbonise.

For India, this is not merely an environmental issue. It is a development issue, a competitiveness issue and increasingly, a market issue. As one of the world’s largest cement producers and among the fastest-growing construction markets, India’s material choices will influence the carbon trajectory of its built environment for decades. As Krishan observed, sustainability solutions in economies such as India must not remain limited to laboratory success. They must be scalable, commercially viable and practical at national level.

The innovation gap: From technology to market

Experts believe that there is a need to bridge the innovation gaps for making decarbonisation in cement and concrete scalable. Devika Wattal of GCCA, explained, “The starting point must be the core cement manufacturing process itself. The first and foremost is the heart of our process, the heart of cement manufacturing. How do we reduce clinker? That is always a topic where industry is working very intrinsically.”

Clinker reduction remains one of the most important pathways for lowering emissions in cement. Since clinker production is energy-intensive and chemically emits carbon dioxide, reducing the clinker factor through supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), blended cements and new chemistries can have a significant impact. Wattal also noted that carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) will have a role, though it may not be the first lever for all markets.

However, she stressed that innovation cannot stop at technology development. A solution that works in the lab must also be adaptable to industry, scalable in production and acceptable in construction practice. “It is important for that innovation to be adaptable, to be scalable, and so that it can be executed in real time,” she said.

Wattal also called for stronger enabling systems around innovation. These include performance-based standards, product-level embodied carbon databases and clearer frameworks for evaluating green materials. Without these, low-carbon cement products may struggle to compete with conventional materials in procurement and design.

R&D must balance carbon, cost and performance

Bringing in the R&D perspective into the discussion, Dr Hemantkumar Aiyer of Nuvoco Vistas emphasised that low-carbon cement development cannot be treated as a single-variable exercise. Cement must perform in real construction conditions. It must deliver strength, durability, consistency and cost competitiveness, while also reducing carbon.

“The root of understanding and balancing all these aspects lies in materials, and knowing the materials,” he said.

According to Dr Aiyer, R&D teams must understand the variability of raw materials such as fly ash, slag and clinker. Different sources produce different material behaviours. This makes mix optimisation, material characterisation and processing-property relationships critical. When performance is affected, cement manufacturers must understand how strength enhancers, admixtures and other performance chemicals interact with the material system.

He also linked material science with process efficiency. Clinkerisation takes place at extremely high temperatures, around 1,400 to 1,450 degrees Celsius. Any improvement in raw mix design, process control or energy optimisation can, therefore, help reduce emissions and cost. Dr Aiyer pointed to artificial intelligence-based optimisation, Cement 4.0 tools and advanced software as important enablers for real-time process and material control.

“The more you understand the materials, the more you can control it,” he said.

LC3: The promise is proven, the sequencing is not

Limestone calcined clay cement, commonly referred to as LC3, has attracted global attention because it can reduce clinker content significantly by using calcined clay and limestone while maintaining performance in many applications. Kiranmai Sanagavarapu of Fuller Technologies said the technology itself has already moved beyond proof of concept. Fuller Technologies has worked with calcined clay technology for nearly two decades and has seen plants running in France and Ghana. These plants, she said, are meeting local and national specifications, while the economics are beginning to make sense.

“The calciner is performing, the economics is stacking up, it is making business sense to produce,” she said.

But if the technology is viable, why has adoption not scaled faster? For Sanagavarapu, the answer lies in project sequencing. Too often, clay characterisation happens after equipment is specified. This, she warned, is a backward approach because calciner design depends on clay mineralogy, kaolinite content, iron levels, reactivity, moisture and other variables.

“If you don’t know what your deposit looks like before you commit for the equipment, you are, in a way, going blind into designing,” she said.

She also identified permitting and plant integration as major bottlenecks. Environmental clearances, mining permissions and local regulatory approvals must begin early. Similarly, calcined clay must be integrated into existing grinding, blending and logistics systems from the design stage, not treated as an afterthought during commissioning.

India already has IS 18189:2023 standard for LC3, but Sanagavarapu pointed out that the standard is not yet visible enough in procurement documents. “The gap between what is technically being permitted and what the procurement is asking is the single biggest bottleneck,” she said.

In her view, successful scale-up depends on getting the sequence right: clay characterisation first, permitting in parallel, standards aligned with construction, and integration built into plant design.

India’s LC3 journey: Progress, but demand remains thin

Providing details of India’s LC3 commercialisation experience, Vaibhav Rathi of GIZ noted that JK Cement carried out the first commercial production of LC3 at its Rajasthan plant, followed by JK Lakshmi Cement three months later. These initiatives were supported by the International Climate Initiative of the Government of Germany, with IIT Delhi contributing deep institutional knowledge on LC3 research and BIS certification.

Rathi said India’s early experience has produced clear lessons. One of the biggest was the need to build capacity among regulators. While BIS certification existed, State Pollution Control Boards were unfamiliar with the technology and unsure about the approval pathway.

“The capacity building is not just needed amongst the producer and the users of the cement, but also the regulators who are working with this technology for the first time,” he said.

He also highlighted the need for better information on China clay deposits. Since China clay is currently classified as a minor mineral, centralised data on availability, quality and location is limited. If cement manufacturers are to adopt LC3 at scale, stronger mineral intelligence will be important.

The third issue is demand. LC3 has already been used in projects such as Palava City in Mumbai and Noida International Airport, but these remain limited examples. “It is in a chicken and egg situation,” Rathi said. “Cement companies are saying we need more demand, and users are saying there is not enough cement available.”

Public procurement, he suggested, could help break this cycle. If agencies such as CPWD and other public bodies begin testing, accepting and specifying LC3, it could create the market confidence needed for cement companies to invest in production and storage.

Building codes must catch up with innovation

Dr Sunita Purushottam of GBPN India argued that material choices will determine built environment emissions over the long term, but India’s current policy signals remain fragmented. Although LC3 has received BIS recognition, she pointed out that building codes, municipal bylaws, schedules of rates and sustainability codes do not yet provide uniform guidance on low-carbon cement.

“The current cement regulations are largely prescriptive and favouring traditional materials,” she said. This limits the ability of alternative materials to compete on performance, durability and emissions.

Dr Purushottam also raised the issue of taxation. Cement, including LC3, currently falls under the same GST bracket as conventional cement. A differentiated tax structure, she argued, could help accelerate market adoption. “In order for the market to demand LC3, that differentiation in the GST could go a long way,” she said.

She noted that green building certifications such as IGBC and GRIHA are already creating demand for low-carbon materials by assigning points for embodied carbon and sustainable material use. However, she said large-scale adoption will require regulatory mandates, particularly through building codes and state-level notifications.

She also cautioned that low-carbon cement alone does not solve the entire building performance problem. A material may reduce embodied carbon, but the operational carbon of a building depends on thermal performance, design, insulation and energy use. “The energy part has two elements,” she said. “One is the embodied carbon of the material itself, and the other is the operational carbon.”

Collaboration is the bridge between invention and impact

Wattal said GCCA sees innovation as a strategic priority and works through platforms that connect industry with academia and start-ups. “There is no way we will decarbonise our sector without innovation,” she said.

However, she stressed that research must be connected to actual industry challenges. Innovations developed in isolation may fail when they encounter real-world barriers such as raw material variability, plant integration, cost, standards and finance. Start-ups, too, need industry mentorship and scale-up pathways.

Wattal also flagged the importance of finance. Even strong technologies may struggle to attract investment if there is no common understanding of bankability. “We have always put projects into, is this a bankable project? But the definition of a bankable project has never been defined,” she said.

For India, she saw strong potential in its academic and start-up ecosystem, but said the challenge lies in alignment and prioritisation. The country has the research base, industrial capacity and market size. What it now needs is a coordinated route from innovation to deployment.

There is a practical concern for cement manufacturers: how can existing plants be adapted for lower emissions without compromising reliability or commercial viability?

Kiranmai Sanagavarapu addressed, “The reliability risk in calcined clay retrofit is definitely real, but it is almost always self-inflicted. The risk arises when a new process is added to an existing circuit without properly redesigning grinding and blending configurations.”

Existing cement plants, she explained, can take two broad routes. The first is external sourcing of calcined clay combined with mill optimisation. This requires lower capital investment and can potentially move in 12 to 18 months if other conditions are in place. It may reduce emissions by around 20 to 30 per cent. The second route is integrated calcination on site, which requires higher capital expenditure and longer lead times, but provides greater control over quality, supply and emissions reduction potential.

For Sanagavarapu, the principle is simple: low-carbon retrofits must be designed with intent. “Design it with an intent properly from the start. Start in the market conditions where the economics are already working,” she said.

Circularity: The overlooked advantage

According to Vaibhav Rathi, fly ash and slag are already well established in cement and construction (C&D), but construction and demolition waste remains underutilised. “C&D waste is a growing business opportunity which not many have taken up,” he said. India’s continuous construction and demolition activity creates huge volumes of waste, much of which contributes to air pollution, land degradation and material inefficiency. With the right processing and standards, this waste can be converted into useful construction products.

Rathi also pointed out that LC3 has a circular economy dimension that is often overlooked. It can use low-grade kaolin-rich clay left behind after high-grade clay is extracted for other applications. “LC3 is not only a low-carbon solution, but also a circular economy solution,” he said.

At the same time, he cautioned that LC3 in India is not yet cheap because it has not reached scale. Site-specific techno-commercial feasibility studies, supported jointly by development agencies and industry, could help companies assess whether LC3 production makes technical and financial sense at a given location.

Dr Purushottam added that India must address both low-carbon cement and construction waste together. “Both low-carbon cement and C&D waste go hand in hand. India does not have an option but to work on both,” she said.

Dr Aiyer called for policy shifts from both government and industry, including preferential purchasing of sustainable materials, minimum supplementary cementitious material requirements in public and public-private projects, and faster regulatory implementation. “If we can fast-track the regulatory standards and their implementation on the ground, that is the way to go,” he said.

From green ambition to green construction

Cement innovation is no longer only about chemistry. It is about systems. Low-carbon cement will scale only when technology, standards, procurement, finance, regulation, education and construction practice move together.

LC3 and other low-carbon technologies have shown promise. India has early commercial examples, strong research capability and growing market interest. But mainstream adoption will depend on whether demand can be created, regulators can be capacitated, standards can be embedded in procurement, and manufacturers can see a clear business case.

For a country building at India’s scale, the opportunity is enormous. Cement will continue to be central to infrastructure and urban development. The challenge now is to ensure that the cement used in India’s growth story carries a lower carbon burden.

  • Rakesh Rao

Participate in Cement Expo 2026 and discover how next-gen infrastructure can be built with innovations in cement.

Continue Reading

Concrete

JK Cement Declared Preferred Bidder For Gilund Limestone Block

Shares Edge Higher As Company Wins Rajasthan Block

Published

on

By

Shares



JK Cement gained after being declared preferred bidder for the Gilund Limestone Block in Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, a lease area of 370.96 hectares. The firm saw its shares trade at Rs. 5550.05, up by 28.45 points or 0.52 per cent from the previous close of Rs. 5521.60 on the BSE. The scrip opened at Rs. 5569.15 and touched a high of Rs. 5625.00 and a low of Rs. 5531.00.

The stock recorded turnover of 1742 shares on the counter and the BSE group A stock with face value Rs. 10 has a 52 week high of Rs. 7565.00 on 20-Aug-2025 and a 52 week low of Rs. 4670.05 on 12-Jun-2026. Last one week high and low stood at Rs. 5625.00 and Rs. 5329.00 respectively. The promoters holding in the company stood at 45.66 per cent, while institutions and non-institutions held 40.61 per cent and 13.73 per cent respectively.

The e-auction conducted by the Government of Rajasthan resulted in the company being declared preferred bidder for the mining lease, and the allocation will enable the company to plan phased development of the deposit, subject to regulatory approvals. The Gilund block spans 370.96 hectares and its allocation is intended to support raw material security for the company’s cement operations in the region. The designation follows the government auction process and will allow the company to plan development and integration of the deposit into its supply chain.

The current market capitalisation stands at Rs. 430.38 billion (bn), reflecting market response to the mining news and prevailing valuation levels for the sector. Investors and analysts will watch for formal allotment and related disclosures that can clarify timelines, capital expenditure and expected production profiles. The report is intended for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice, and market participants are advised to consult advisers before making decisions.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Star Cement Named Preferred Bidder For Boro Lakhindong Block

Preferred bidder for limestone mining lease in Assam

Published

on

By

Shares



Star Cement has been declared the preferred bidder for the mining lease for Boro Lakhindong West Block following e-auctions conducted by the Government of Assam. The block is located in Boro Lakhindong Village, Umrangso Tehsil, Dima Hasao District, Assam, and extends over an area of 123 hectares. The estimated limestone resource is 207.822 million (mn) tonnes (t), a quantity that will supply raw material for cement production and support the company’s manufacturing operations in the region.

The company is engaged in the manufacturing and selling of cement clinker and cement and distributes products across the north-eastern and eastern states of India. Star Cement operates plants and logistics networks that procure and process limestone to produce clinker for cement, and the addition of Boro Lakhindong is presented as a strategic enhancement of feedstock availability. The preferred bidder status secures rights to the specified lease area under the terms of the auction process.

Financial results for the company in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2026 showed a consolidated net profit rise of 20.24 per cent to Rs 1,481.0 mn on an 11.54 per cent increase in revenue to Rs 11,735.5 mn compared with the corresponding quarter of the previous year. Those results reflected higher sales volumes and revenue growth in the company’s primary markets and are cited in company disclosures accompanying the lease announcement. The reported performance provides context to the company’s ability to pursue and finance new mining lease opportunities.

Market reaction to the declaration was modest, with the scrip rising zero point thirty six per cent to trade at Rs 212 on the BSE. The award of the Boro Lakhindong lease concludes the e-auction process for the west block and assigns operational rights to Star Cement as the preferred bidder, subject to completion of statutory and contractual formalities.

Continue Reading

Video Thumbnail

    SIGN-UP FOR OUR GENERAL NEWSLETTER


    Trending News

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

     

    Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

     


      This will close in 0 seconds