Connect with us

Concrete

Sometimes, a comedy of errors

Published

on

Shares

My first real project was one such. I was just two years out of engineering college, a mechanical engineer raring to have a go at the world. I was fortunate that I got a job in a well-known engineering and projects company, (at a very princely salary of Rs 700 per month, by the way!) and I spent the first two years on the shop floor in a heavy engineering workshop, where no two jobs were alike, no two machine tools were identical, and no two people thought or acted similarly. It was diversity at its best ever, as you can possibly see, and every hour, every day of it was worthwhile. It was here, that one night while I was on night shift duty in the machine shop, I took a break to go into the adjacent central office and typed out a three page letter addressed to the Managing Director, giving detailed suggestions on how the graduate engineers training scheme could be improved. But, that is another story, for another day.

Let us come back to the project story, for now. The year was 1981, I would guess. Without naming the project and the customer, let me just say that it was a hi-tech metallurgical project, being installed for the first time in India in an integrated steel plant, valued at approximately Rs 4 to 5 crore. This was being executed in collaboration with a famous German company. After two years of a good grind in the machine shop floor, I was given the role of a project coordinator in this project, operating initially from the Kolkata Project and Engineering Office, and then moving to site once erection work started. This is when all hell broke loose. This is where we proved beyond an iota of doubt that Mr Murphy was an optimist, because here everything went wrong, and more! I remember that we used to lament that everything that we engineered, manufactured or purchased for this project, gave trouble of some kind or other at site, starting from anti-static floor-mats to Programmable Logic Control Panels, from foundation bolts to hydraulic actuators.

Talking about foundation bolts, this is an item often forgotten, probably because it falls ??etween the stools??of scope of supply of the Supplier and the Erector and the Civil Contractor. First thing we found at site when kicking off erection work, was that the foundation bolts were missing, no one delivered them. It took a few days of running around to get the whole set manufactured, and things got delayed in the process. Today, the first thing that I check in a project, (always, everytime) is have the anchor bolts and inserts been delivered. That was lesson number one!

An anecdotal account of all the pitfalls we encountered at this project site, would have surely made absorbing reading, but sadly, it is somewhat difficult to recall full details of 30 year old incidents. However, some such snippets are still etched in mind.

Another freak problem was, that of fast uncontrolled descent of 25 tonne fabricated vacuum covers, when they were being stopped electrically at the end of the lift. This was due to the few milliseconds of delay of braking through electro-hydraulic thrustor brakes, but the free fall of the heavy covers was really scary. We solved this one at site by installing electro-mechanical timers in the motor circuit, such that motor is stopped with a delay, after the brake gets the signal. I personally loved this one, and that is why I may not forget this incident ever in my lifetime!

Hydraulics were an important part of the project, not only for actuation, but also for fine controls. There were several Moog Control valves with closed loop electronics, and obviously, there were special low-micron high pressure filters upstream of these valves. These were in addition to normal coarse filters in the circuit, as well as LP filters on return line, and recirculating filtration circuits. When we started testing and trial operations of the hydraulics, after thorough cleaning/pickling/pressure test etc, the HP filters started getting choked frequently, and soon we had consumed all spare filter cartridges, which were imported as two years??spares! This, despite the fact that the whole hydraulic Power System along with the Tank were located in a pressurized cellar. What ensued was a lot of study, a lot of data collection, and a lot of consultation with experts. We learnt a lot about selection criteria of hydraulic filters, agglomeration of particulates in hydraulic flow, logjam effect, etc. Ultimately, we zeroed in on a recirculating electrostatic paper filter system, which ran 24×7 in parallel, and brought down the particulate contamination in the tank, of all sizes, to considerably lower levels, and only then the imported HP Filter cartridges started giving long life. This incident made me some sort of an ??xpert??on hydraulic oil filtration.

I know that some the incidents will evoke laughter, but I will still take the risk of narrating the story of the travelling weigh hopper, which refused to travel. This one was a 800 KG capacity load-cell mounted motorised weigh hopper designed to travel on square bar rails, equipped with trailing cable. This hopper was to travel below several bunkers, and receive measured weights of various mineral additives, and then discharge the same into a two chamber vacuum lock. When we did everything right, and switched on the power from local control push button, the small little wheels of the hopper started rotating furiously, but it did not move forward. It was a real hilarious scene. The weight of the hopper was far too less compared to the motor power, and there was inadequate rolling friction for traction to take place. We did a star-delta switch arrangement to reduce the motor power, and it worked beautifully thereafter.

Pages of this issue will fall short of space, if I were to keep talking about all the other problems, related to things like steam ejectors, counter-sunk bolts for liner plates, electro-mechanical actuators, slide gates in ladles, etc., etc, and also, things may become too technical for some of us. The essence is, during design and manufacture phase of a project, we may do many things good or bad, right or wrong, but all of these come home to roost at site, during installation. No more can the problems or mistakes be overlooked or avoided, they have to be resolved then and there, and otherwise work will stall. In that way, Erection at site is the last bit of execution, which is unforgiving, merciless. Here, at site, none of the time-tested strategies like ??assing the buck?? ??elaying/postponing?? ??kirting the issue?? etc work. Here, one has to catch the proverbial bull by the horn and find a solution and implement the solution as soon as possible. Of course, this is the reason why site work is so interesting, at the same time so much more full of adrenalin, action and tension. On hindsight, I liked it. And my advice to young project managers is that they should not miss an opportunity to work at installation sites, particularly if the project is ??irst of its kind in the country?? One or two years of work at site is like five years in the air-conditioned office, in terms of enriching experience of problem solving and project management.

– SUMIT BANERJEE

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Concrete

NBCC Wins Rs 550m IOB Office Project In Raipur

PMC Contract Covers Design, Execution And Handover

Published

on

By

Shares

State-owned construction major NBCC India Ltd has secured a new domestic work order worth around Rs 550.2 million from Indian Overseas Bank (IOB) in the normal course of business, according to a regulatory filing.

The project involves planning, designing, execution and handover of IOB’s new Regional Office building at Raipur. The contract has been awarded under NBCC’s project management consultancy (PMC) operations and excludes GST.

NBCC said the order further strengthens its construction and infrastructure portfolio. The company clarified that the contract is not a related party transaction and that neither its promoter nor promoter group has any interest in the awarding entity.

The development has been duly disclosed to the stock exchanges as part of NBCC’s standard compliance requirements.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Nuvoco Q3 EBITDA Jumps As Cement Sales Hit Record

Premium products and cost control lift profitability

Published

on

By

Shares

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd reported a strong financial performance for the quarter ended 31 December 2025 (Q3 FY26), driven by record cement sales, higher premium product volumes and improved operational efficiencies.

The company achieved its highest-ever third-quarter consolidated cement sales volume of 5 million tonnes, registering growth of 7 per cent year-on-year. Consolidated revenue from operations rose 12 per cent to Rs 27.01 billion during the quarter. EBITDA increased sharply by 50 per cent YoY to Rs 3.86 billion, supported by improved pricing and cost management.

Premium products continued to be a key growth driver, sustaining a historic high contribution of 44 per cent for the second consecutive quarter. The strong momentum reflects rising brand traction for the Nuvoco Concreto and Nuvoco Duraguard ranges, which are increasingly recognised as trusted choices in building materials.

In the ready-mix concrete segment, Nuvoco witnessed healthy demand traction across its Concreto product portfolio. The company launched Concreto Tri Shield, a specialised offering delivering three-layer durability and a 50 per cent increase in structural lifespan. In the modern building materials category, the firm introduced Nuvoco Zero M Unnati App, a digital loyalty platform aimed at improving influencer engagement, transparency and channel growth.

Despite heavy rainfall affecting parts of the quarter, the company maintained improved performance supported by strong premiumisation and operational discipline. Capacity expansion projects in the East, along with ongoing execution at the Vadraj Cement facilities, remain on track. The operationalisation of the clinker unit and grinding capacity, planned in phases starting Q3 FY27, is expected to lift total cement capacity to around 35 million tonnes per annum, reinforcing Nuvoco’s position as India’s fifth-largest cement group.

Commenting on the results, Managing Director Mr Jayakumar Krishnaswamy said Q3 marked strong recovery and momentum despite economic challenges. He highlighted double-digit volume growth, premium-led expansion and a 50 per cent rise in EBITDA. The company also recorded its lowest blended fuel cost in 17 quarters at Rs 1.41 per Mcal. Refurbishment and project execution at the Vadraj Cement Plant are progressing steadily, which, along with strategic capacity additions and cost efficiencies, is expected to strengthen Nuvoco’s long-term competitive advantage.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Cement Industry Backs Co-Processing to Tackle Global Waste

Industry bodies recently urged policy support for cement co-processing as waste solution

Published

on

By

Shares
Leading industry bodies, including the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), European Composites Industry Association, International Solid Waste Association – Africa, Mission Possible Partnership and the Global Waste-to-Energy Research and Technology Council, have issued a joint statement highlighting the cement industry’s potential role in addressing the growing global challenge of non-recyclable and non-reusable waste. The organisations have called for stronger policy support to unlock the full potential of cement industry co-processing as a safe, effective and sustainable waste management solution.
Co-processing enables both energy recovery and material recycling by using suitable waste to replace fossil fuels in cement kilns, while simultaneously recycling residual ash into the cement itself. This integrated approach delivers a zero-waste solution, reduces landfill dependence and complements conventional recycling by addressing waste streams that cannot be recycled or are contaminated.
Already recognised across regions including Europe, India, Latin America and North America, co-processing operates under strict regulatory and technical frameworks to ensure high standards of safety, emissions control and transparency.
Commenting on the initiative, Thomas Guillot, Chief Executive of the GCCA, said co-processing offers a circular, community-friendly waste solution but requires effective regulatory frameworks and supportive public policy to scale further. He noted that while some cement kilns already substitute over 90 per cent of their fuel with waste, many regions still lack established practices.
The joint statement urges governments and institutions to formally recognise co-processing within waste policy frameworks, support waste collection and pre-treatment, streamline permitting, count recycled material towards national recycling targets, and provide fiscal incentives that reflect environmental benefits. It also calls for stronger public–private partnerships and international knowledge sharing.
With global waste generation estimated at over 11 billion tonnes annually and uncontrolled municipal waste projected to rise sharply by 2050, the signatories believe co-processing represents a practical and scalable response. With appropriate policy backing, it can help divert waste from landfills, reduce fossil fuel use in cement manufacturing and transform waste into a valuable societal resource.    

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds