Connect with us

Concrete

Fall and Rise of Fibre Cement sheets

Published

on

Shares

The use of Asbestos Fibre is increasing globally, after a decline in the 1990s. A study shows that a substantial increase in consumption in about 12 countries particularly from the year 2000 to 2004. Use of Asbestos has always been a contentious subject to deal with, we have tried to give a fair picture on the subject.

Nature has provided us a wonderful material which is in use in the present form for more than 100 years. We are talking about Asbestos. It is a naturally occurring mineral that is commonly used as building materials. Asbestos consists of long, thin fibres which make it as a good thermal insulator. For a thousands of years, people were knowing this fire-resistant, strong yet flexible material. From the early 1900s and downwards, Asbestos has been largely used in the fields of construction, maritime, industrial and commercial products.

More about the material properties and it?s superiority has been stated in the interview given by John Nicodemus of ?The Fibre Cement Products Manufacturers? Association? and Jayachandran of HIL Ltd. The known use of Asbestos is not merely to provide reinforcement to the cement sheets but the same material due to it?s properties find its usage in heat and electrical insulating materials like gloves used in furnace, making rope for electrical and heat insulation, industrial gaskets, protective clothing for use in high temperature areas etc. Sheet panels and false ceiling tiles is another use of Asbestos fibre. But the major one has remained in making corrugated sheets. Asbestos is a very good additive with cement which adds strength to the material. Compared to other cement additives, Asbestos is cheap yet durable. The technology of producing sheets is pretty simple and quite old. Some improvements have happened over time but these are not major ones as stated by Jayachandran of HIL Ltd. For producing the sheets and other products there are well laid out specifications by Bureau of Indian Standards. The detailed manufacturing process is given else where in the issue.

Advantages of Asbestos
In terms of building roof shingles, they could last for about fifty to sixty years. Compared to plastic and wood, Asbestos is undoubtedly first in terms of longevity and cost together. More on the advantages you can read the interview of John in this issue.

Particularly in a country like India it will be just impossible to stop use of corrugated Asbestos cement sheets simply due to cost consideration and number of users coming from economically weaker class.

Disadvantages of Asbestos
Among the entire family of Asbestos fibres, Chrysotile or white Asbestos is widely used and supposed to be safe in it?s application as stated by both Jayachandran and John. The Amphibole or black variety variety of Asbestos has been prohibited, the world over. However World Health Organization and International Labour Organization do not agree with the statement. Views of both these organisations have been printed elsewhere for our readers.

Those who are directly exposed to Asbestos like construction workers and carpenters, can be afflicted with lung cancer and mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is defined as a rare cancer that affects the linings of the lungs or abdomen. Because the disease typically takes 20 to 40 years to manifest, workers can go through their careers without realizing they are getting sick. Due to its health risks, certain Asbestos products are banned in many countries, especially in Europe, but there is no ban in U.S and Canada. Asbestos in the bound form or combined form is not at all dangerous but loose Asbestos fibres are always dangerous. What is utmost important is letting loose Asbestos fibres in air. Asbestos in the loose form which ever variety is certainly dangerous because the chances of inhaling Asbestos are highest in loose form. In the past as stated by Jayachandran was extremely dangerous. If there is careless construction method concerning Asbestos, the Asbestos fibres can be lodged into the air. Though it might seemc that there?s nothing special about it, Asbestos fibres pose a great risk to one?s health.

The immediate competitor for the corrugated cement Asbestos sheets have been the metal sheets either Aluminium or Galvanized Iron. But these two products are miles away in the initial cost. There have been claims and counter claims on the advantages made by Asbestos Sheet producers and Metal sheet producers. We produce both comparisons and leave it to the judgment of the readers. Refere to Table 1 and Table 2.

Elimination of asbestos-related diseases
There have been many negative reports published about use of Asbestos, we tried to get some information from the website of World Health Organisation.

All forms of asbestos are carcinogenic to humans. Exposure to asbestos, including chrysotile, causes cancer of the lung, larynx and ovaries, and also mesothelioma (a cancer of the pleural and peritoneal linings). Asbestos exposure is also responsible for other diseases such as asbestosis (fibrosis of the lungs), and plaques, thickening and effusion in the pleura.

Currently, about 125 million people in the world are exposed to asbestos at the workplace. According to the most recent WHO estimates, more than 107,000 people die each year from asbestos-related lung cancer, mesothelioma and asbestosis resulting from exposure at work. Approximately half of the deaths from occupational cancer are estimated to be caused by asbestos. In addition, it is estimated that several thousand deaths annually can be attributed to exposure to asbestos in the home.

It has also been shown that co-exposure to tobacco smoke and asbestos fibres substantially increases the risk for lung cancer? and the heavier the smoking the greater the risk.

WHO response
The World Health Assembly Resolution 58.22 on cancer prevention urges Member States to pay special attention to cancers for which avoidable exposure is a factor, including exposure to chemicals at the workplace and in the environment. With Resolution 60.26, the World Health Assembly requested WHO to carry out a global campaign for the elimination of asbestos-related diseases "…bearing in mind a differentiated approach to regulating its various forms – in line with the relevant international legal instruments and the latest evidence for effective interventions…". …".. Cost-effective interventions for prevention of occupational lung diseases from exposure to asbestos are among the policy options for implementing the global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases (2013-2020), as endorsed by the Sixty-sixth World Health Assembly in resolution WHA66.10 in 2013.

Position on safety in the use of asbestos
ILO has taken similar stand as that of WHO. Two important clauses from ILO statement on Asbestos are reproduced here.

The Occupational Cancer Convention, 1974 (No. 139), provides for the measures to be taken for the control and prevention of occupational hazards caused by carcinogenic substances. Key provisions of Convention No. 139 concern:

  • Periodically determining the carcinogenic substances and agents to which occupational exposure shall be prohibited or control;
  • Making every effort to have carcinogenic substances and agents to which workers may be exposed in the course of their work replaced by non-carcinogenic substances or agents or by less harmful substances or agents;
  • Reducing the number of workers exposed to carcinogenic substances or agents and the duration and degree of such exposure to the minimum

A Resolution concerning asbestos was adopted by the ILO Conference at its 95th Session in 2006. Noting that all forms of asbestos, including chrysotile, are classified as human carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and expressing its concern that workers continue to face serious risks from asbestos exposure, particularly in asbestos removal, demolition, building maintenance, ship breaking and waste handling activities, it calls for:

  • The elimination of the future use of asbestos and the identification and proper management of asbestos in place as the most effective means to protect workers from asbestos exposure and to prevent future diseases and deaths.
  • The Resolution also underlined that the ILO Convention on Safety in the Use of Asbestos, No. 162, should not be used to provide a justification for, or endorsement of, the continued use of asbestos.

Table 1: Extract of the claims made by "The Fibre Cement Products Manufacturers’ Association"

S.No. Characteristics Asbestos Cement Sheets Galvanized Aluminium Sheets
1 Life Span(Years) 50 yrs (Min) Non-Corrosive 10-15 yrs
2 Fire Rating Fire Retardant and Non Combustible Tendency to twist and melt
3 Thermal Insulation & Accoustic Rating Good Poor
4 Energy Required in Production
(Kilowatthours(kwh)/SQ.M)
16 69
5 Weather Effect None Corrosion at drilled holes and
where galvanizing is cracked
6 Noise Level Low High
7 Cost Low High

Table 2: Life cycle cost comparison claimed by the manufacturer of metal sheets

S.No. Item Aluminium
Plain
GI
Plain
Asbestos
Bare
1 Thickness (mm) 0.7 0.5 5
2 Qty(Kg) required per sq. mtrs
of area
2.5 3.9 13.5
3 Price (Rs./ Kg.) 220 42 15.4
4 Total Cost per Sq. mtr. 550 165.5 207.9
5 Life Span 40 10 15
Net Cost per year per sq. mtrs 13.8 16.5 13.9
6 Scrap Value after life span 250 11.8 0
7 Net cost per year per sq. mtr
(Considering Scrap value)
7.5 15 15

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Concrete

Cement Makers’ Margins To Fall Rs 50-75 Per Tonne Amid West Asia Conflict

Crisil Sees Margins Easing Despite Steady Demand

Published

on

By

Shares

Crisil said operating margins of Indian cement manufacturers are expected to decline by Rs 50-75 per tonne (t) this fiscal to Rs 925-950 per t due to higher input costs triggered by the West Asia conflict. The analysis covered 18 cement companies accounting for nearly 90 per cent of India’s domestic cement capacity and noted margins had improved sharply to around Rs 1,000 per t in fiscal 2026.

Crisil noted that the reduction would be driven mainly by higher power and fuel costs, which account for about 30 per cent of total costs, as petcoke and imported coal prices have surged amid geopolitical uncertainties. Freight costs, which account for about a quarter of total costs, are also expected to remain elevated because of higher diesel prices. The impact on profitability is likely to be more pronounced in the first half of the fiscal year before easing commodity prices moderate cost pressures later.

The rating agency said steady domestic demand and strong balance sheets should keep credit profiles stable despite the moderation in margins. Green energy currently accounts for 35-40 per cent of the sector’s total electricity consumption and is expected to partly cushion higher energy costs. Operating cash flows are likely to remain resilient, supported by projected 6-7 per cent growth in cement demand this fiscal.

Crisil highlighted that demand growth will be driven primarily by infrastructure spending, which meets about one-third of sector consumption, and by a nearly 18 per cent higher budgetary allocation for core ministries that should support project execution. Weaker rural housing demand amid pressure on agricultural incomes from a possible below-average monsoon may be offset by improved urban housing demand supported by favourable home-loan rates and a strong pipeline of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Urban projects. Ongoing capacity additions will keep capital expenditure elevated and may lift net debt to EBITDA to between 1.2 and 1.4 times from around 1.0 time last fiscal, though ratios are expected to remain healthy.

Continue Reading

Concrete

UltraTech Board Approves Rs 50 bn Fundraise Via NCDs

Company to issue half a million debentures for expansion plan

Published

on

By

Shares

UltraTech Cement’s board of directors has approved raising Rs 5,000 crore (Rs 50 bn) through non?convertible debentures issued in rupees.

The finance committee cleared a proposal to issue up to 500,000 fully paid, unsecured, listed, rated, redeemable, rupee?denominated, non?convertible, non?cumulative debentures of Rs 1 lakh each (Rs 0.1 mn each), aggregating to the Rs 5,000 crore programme.

As of June 2026 the firm reported net debt of Rs 15,875 crore (Rs 158.75 bn) and said its capacity expansion projects under execution are backed by capital expenditure of about Rs 17,000 crore (Rs 170 bn) over the next two to two?and?a?half years.

UltraTech spent Rs 9,500 crore (Rs 95 bn) on capital expenditure in financial year 2026 and in April the group crossed 200.1 mn tonnes per annum of domestic grey cement capacity and 205.5 mn tonnes per annum of global capacity.

The chief financial officer indicated the company would take consolidated capacity beyond 242 mn tonnes per annum, with grey cement capacity reaching 212.7 mn tonnes per annum by the end of financial year 2027. He noted the net debt?to?earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation ratio stood at 0.87 times as of June 2026 and the company was confident of ending financial year 2027 with the ratio below one time.

In the first quarter of financial year 2026?27 UltraTech’s net profit attributable to owners rose 16.8 per cent year?on?year to Rs 2,599.3 crore (Rs 25.993 bn) and revenue from operations increased 15.9 per cent to Rs 24,648.20 crore (Rs 246.482 bn). The board approval is expected to complement internal cash flows as the company advances its expansion programme.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Reimagining the Future

Published

on

By

Shares

From LC3 and AI-driven kilns to RDF gasification, ICR explores the full breadth of technological innovation reshaping India’s cement industry. Low-carbon materials, digital manufacturing, alternative fuels and breakthrough concrete science are collectively advancing the sector’s transition from high-emission commodity producer toward a net-zero, infrastructure-ready future.

Innovation has become the defining force shaping the future of the cement industry. As the world’s second-largest cement producer, India is witnessing rising demand driven by infrastructure development, urbanisation, affordable housing, and industrial growth. At the same time, the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that cement production accounts for nearly 7 per cent to 8 per cent of global CO2 emissions, with clinker manufacturing contributing the largest share, making innovation an operational necessity. The industry is therefore investing heavily in low-carbon cement technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), digital manufacturing, alternative fuels, renewable energy and carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS). Innovations such as limestone calcined
clay cement (LC3), supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), AI-driven process optimisation and automated quality control are enabling manufacturers to produce more sustainable, efficient, and high-performance cement.
According to the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), achieving net-zero emissions will require a combination of material innovation, digital transformation, circular economy practices and collaborative research, making innovation central to the industry’s long-term competitiveness and India’s sustainable infrastructure growth.

Next-generation cement
The future of cement lies in reducing its dependence on clinker-the most carbon-intensive component of cement-through the adoption of low-carbon materials and advanced blended cement technologies. Products such as Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC), Portland Slag Cement (PSC), Portland Composite Cement (PCC), and LC3 are driving this shift by replacing clinker with SCMs like fly ash, GGBS, calcined clay and limestone.
According to GCCA, SCMs can replace 30 to 50 per cent of clinker, with some applications exceeding 70 per cent, significantly reducing carbon emissions without compromising strength or durability. These blended cements also improve concrete performance by enhancing durability, reducing permeability, and increasing resistance to chloride and sulphate attacks. As the availability of traditional SCMs declines with the decarbonisation of the power and steel sectors, the industry is increasingly exploring alternative materials and next-generation cement formulations to support long-term sustainability.
Shrivats Singhania, Deputy Managing Director, JK Lakshmi Cement, says, “Innovation is enabling the cement industry to address one of its most important challenges – producing more with fewer resources and lower emissions. Across the value chain, manufacturers are deploying technologies that simultaneously improve operational efficiency and advance sustainability goals. For example, greater adoption of alternative fuels, waste heat recovery systems, renewable energy, and digital process controls is helping reduce energy consumption and optimise resource utilisation. Data-driven manufacturing allows plants to monitor operations in real time, improve equipment reliability, minimise downtime, and reduce wastage, resulting in both environmental and economic benefits.”
“Meaningful progress is also being achieved through material innovation. The growing use of blended cements and next-generation products such as LC3 reduces dependence on clinker, the most carbon-intensive component of cement production, thereby lowering embodied carbon without compromising performance,” he adds.
Among emerging technologies, LC3 has gained global recognition as one of the most promising low-carbon cement innovations. In a standard formulation, LC3 comprises approximately 50 per cent clinker, 30 per cent calcined clay, 15 per cent limestone, and 5 per cent gypsum. LC3 can reduce CO2 emissions by up to 40 per cent compared with Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) while delivering comparable strength and enhanced durability. Its reliance on abundant, locally available raw materials, rather than industrial by-products, makes it highly scalable and well suited to countries like India.
According to the LC3 Project, nearly 75 per cent of cement plants worldwide could adopt LC3 using existing manufacturing infrastructure, potentially reducing global CO2 emissions by over 400 million tonnes annually, if adopted at scale globally. India’s introduction of BIS standard IS 18189:2023 for LC3, coupled with its adoption in projects such as the Noida International Airport, marks a step toward commercial implementation. As demand for sustainable construction grows, LC3 is poised to become a cornerstone of low-carbon infrastructure development.

Making of a smart cement plant
The modern cement plant is rapidly evolving into a digitally connected, AI-enabled manufacturing ecosystem where data drives every aspect of production – from raw material proportioning and kiln operations to quality control, maintenance and energy management.
According to IEA, digital technologies can improve energy efficiency in heavy industries by 10 per cent to 20 per cent. Advanced process control systems in cement plants have demonstrated the potential to reduce thermal energy consumption by 3 to 5 per cent, lower electricity consumption by 2 to 10 per cent, and improve kiln throughput and clinker quality. AI-powered predictive maintenance further helps reduce unplanned equipment downtime by 30 to 50 per cent and extend equipment life by continuously analysing sensor data to detect failures before
they occur.
Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology, says, “AFR is no longer viewed solely as a sustainability initiative. It has become a strategic business priority for cement manufacturers. Rising fuel costs, stricter environmental regulations, and growing pressure to reduce dependence on conventional fuels are accelerating AFR adoption across the industry. However, the success of an AFR project depends heavily on how effectively waste is processed before it reaches the kiln. Poor preprocessing can negatively impact kiln performance, fuel efficiency, and emission control systems. Inconsistent fuel
quality often forces operators to make frequent adjustments, reducing throughput and increasing energy consumption.”
Dr Kapil Kukreja, General Manager, NCCBM, says, “Variations in composition, particle size, and calorific value can lead to inconsistent combustion behaviour resulting in fluctuating heat release patterns. These fluctuations can affect process stability, temperature control and clinker quality. Additionally, incomplete combustion of RDF particles can result in increased emissions, higher unburnt carbon content, and operational difficulties within the calciner system. Higher ash and inert content of RDF can dilute the clinker quality and reduce calciner efficiency.”
Meanwhile, digital twins are allowing manufacturers to simulate entire production processes, optimise kiln performance, evaluate process changes virtually, and reduce operational risks before implementation. Automated Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS), coupled with online and offline XRF and XRD analysers, are delivering real-time monitoring of clinker chemistry and mineralogy, ensuring tighter quality control, lower clinker variability and more consistent cement performance.
Dr Prateek Sharma, Group Project Manager, NCCBM, explains, “Chlorides and alkalis present in RDF can lead to excess buildup and blockages in the kiln and calciner increasing the downtime of cement plants. Hence, issues with direct utilisation of RDF establishes the need for fuel conditioning and alternative utilisation approaches that can maximise the energy potential of RDF while minimising adverse impacts on plant operation. RDF gasification emerges as an efficient tool for converting solid RDF into syngas which can be used as a fuel with improved characteristics.”
Digitalisation and intelligent manufacturing will be among the most critical enablers of achieving the cement industry’s net-zero ambitions by improving operational efficiency while simultaneously reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, confirms a GCCA report.

From research to reality
While the cement industry has made remarkable progress in developing breakthrough technologies, the transition from laboratory research to large-scale commercial deployment remains one of its greatest challenges. The successful adoption of innovations such as LC3), CCUS, advanced alternative fuels, green hydrogen and novel SCMs depend not only on technical feasibility but also on economic viability, regulatory support, raw material availability, and market acceptance.
Veerendra Jamdade, CEO and Founder, Vritti Solutions, states, “The cement industry has a market that is constantly in flux, due to factors such as infrastructure investment, seasonality of demand, fuel costs, building activity by region and general economic cycles; therefore, having accurate forecasts is very important in this type of market. Traditional ERP systems are primarily data repositories with limited analytic functionality; thus, they capture transactional and operational information but generally lack advanced analytical capabilities for converting captured data into actionable information. This
affects everything from demand forecasting and inventory planning through procurement and production scheduling.”
According to IEA, technologies that are still at the demonstration or early commercial stage-including CCUS and next-generation low-carbon binders-are expected to contribute nearly 40 per cent of the emissions reductions required for the global cement sector to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, underscoring the importance of accelerating their scale-up. This requires robust R&D ecosystems, stronger collaboration between cement manufacturers, research institutions, technology providers,
equipment suppliers, and policymakers, as well as supportive standards and financial incentives to reduce investment risks.
Ashutosh Pandita, Director – Head, Cement Business, TKIL Industries, elaborates, “The cement industry’s most transformative innovation today is the increased use of alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR), supported by advanced feeding systems and process technologies that are driving both operational efficiency and decarbonisation. Looking ahead, oxyfuel combustion and carbon capture technologies remain underappreciated but hold immense potential for enabling deep reductions in carbon emissions and accelerating the industry’s journey towards net-zero production. By 2030, cement manufacturing is expected to become significantly more sustainable, energy-efficient, and technology-driven, with widespread adoption of AFR, low-clinker cement technologies, greater digitalisation and automation, and the early commercial deployment of carbon capture solutions, all supported by stronger industry collaboration and a shared commitment to achieving long-term sustainability goals.”
In India, organisations such as the National Council for Cement and Building Materials (NCCBM), leading academic institutions, and major cement companies are working together to develop and validate emerging technologies, while the introduction of standards such as IS 18189:2023 for Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) marks a significant step towards commercial adoption. However, challenges such as high capital investment, long validation cycles, limited infrastructure for technologies like CCUS, fluctuating availability of alternative raw materials, and customer acceptance continue to slow implementation. Bridging the gap between research and commercial reality will therefore require sustained investment in innovation, knowledge-sharing, pilot projects, policy support, and industry-wide collaboration to ensure that promising technologies evolve into scalable, economically viable solutions capable of transforming the future of cement manufacturing.

Creating a green future
Clinker production will increasingly rely on low-carbon technologies such as LC3, high-volume SCMs, AFR, renewable energy, waste heat recovery, and eventually CCUS, enabling manufacturers to significantly reduce their environmental footprint.
Achieving net-zero concrete by 2050 will require a combination of clinker substitution (around 37 per cent of cumulative CO2 reductions), carbon capture technologies (approximately 36 per cent), and improvements in thermal efficiency, renewable energy, and circular economy practices.
Industry Expert SA Khadilkar comments, “Customer requirements are a key driver of innovation in the cement industry, influencing product development, process improvements, sustainability initiatives, and digital solutions. Innovation is most effective when it addresses real market needs, particularly in areas such as performance, durability, and application-specific requirements. Around a decade ago, ACC and Ambuja Cements (now Adani Cement) recognised this shift and introduced performance-oriented blended cement brands with enhanced durability, reduced water penetration, and OPC-like properties. Their success encouraged other major cement manufacturers to develop specialised cement brands with unique performance characteristics, demonstrating how product innovation has evolved to meet changing customer expectations.”
“Ultimately, customer expectations have transformed innovation from a technology-driven exercise into a market-driven strategy, ensuring that new developments create measurable value across the construction value chain,” he adds.
India is expected to add nearly 500 million square metres of urban built-up area by 2030, driving sustained demand for greener, more durable, and higher-performing construction materials, according to NITI Aayog. Meeting this demand will require cement manufacturers to evolve from commodity producers into integrated providers of sustainable building solutions, supported by data-driven manufacturing, collaborative R&D, customer-centric product innovation, and circular resource management. The cement plant of tomorrow will therefore be defined not only by its production capacity but also by its ability to manufacture smarter, cleaner, and more sustainable construction materials that support India’s ambitious infrastructure and climate goals.

Conclusion
The path ahead is clear in its direction, if not yet in its pace. India’s position as the world’s second-largest cement producer, combined with its infrastructure ambitions and its 2070 net-zero commitment, makes this transition both urgent
and consequential.
What this article has made evident is that no single technology will carry the industry to net zero. LC3 addresses clinker dependency. Digital manufacturing addresses efficiency and waste. Alternative fuels address fossil fuel dependence. CCUS addresses the residual process emissions that no other lever can reach. Each is necessary. None is sufficient alone. The industry’s task is to advance all of them simultaneously, at a pace that matches the scale of the challenge.
The plants that will build tomorrow’s highways, airports and homes will need to do so with a fraction of today’s carbon footprint.

Innovations in cement and concrete

  1. Carbon mineralisation in concrete: A 2026 peer-reviewed study in the Journal of the American Ceramic Society by MIT’s Masic Lab and CarbonCure Technologies used in-situ Raman microspectroscopy to show that CO2 injected during cement mixing triggers a three-stage hydration sequence, producing a more uniform microstructure with approximately 13 per cent higher early strength while permanently sequestering carbon within the concrete matrix.

Source: www.carboncure.com

  1. Zero-clinker geopolymer blocks: Theseus Development manufactures geopolymer blocks using upcycled aluminosilicate waste from quarries and mines through an inorganic polymerisation process, achieving up to 80 per cent lower embodied carbon compared to conventional cement blocks. An interlocking block design reduces mortar requirements, lowering construction costs while eliminating clinker entirely from the production process.

Source: www.rmi.org

  1. 3D-printed basalt fibre grids: Austrian startup Fiber Elements, founded in 2023, uses robotically wound continuous basalt fibres arranged into three-dimensional reinforcement grids that replace steel in concrete structures. The resulting composites are three times stronger than steel, weigh two-thirds less, resist corrosion entirely and reduce CO2 emissions by up to 70 per cent compared to conventional steel-reinforced concrete.

Source: www.eitmanufacturing.eu

  1. Self-healing concrete: Dutch company Basilisk leads commercial deployment of bacteria-based self-healing concrete, with licensed production now active in Japan and a highway viaduct pilot planned for 2026. Dormant Bacillus bacteria embedded in the mix activate upon crack formation, metabolising nutrients to precipitate calcium carbonate that autonomously seals fractures. The global self-healing concrete market is projected to grow significantly through 2031, driven by green building mandates and infrastructure agencies targeting lower maintenance costs and extended structural life.

Sources: www.thelegaljournalontechnology.com and www.mordorintelligence.com

Continue Reading

Video Thumbnail

    SIGN-UP FOR OUR GENERAL NEWSLETTER


    Trending News

    SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

     

    Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

     


      This will close in 0 seconds