Economy & Market
A circular economy is imperative for a sustainable future
Published
7 years agoon
By
admin
Ujjwal Batria, Chief Operating Officer, Dalmia Cement (Bharat)
Give us a brief on the activities of Dalmia Group in the Indian subcontinent regarding AFR.
Cement is an essential commodity in construction and infrastructure development. Although there is some environmental impact during its production, we have always adhered to strict environmental norms and have implemented various measures in line with the evolving technologies to reduce the carbon footprint. In sync with the Swachh Bharat Mission, we make major use of AFR (alternative fuels and raw materials).
Apart from AFR, we use fly ash (thermal power plant waste) and BF Slag (steel industry waste) in our blended cement, which comprises nearly 80 per cent of our product portfolio. Our AFR consumption has more than doubled from 14.5 per cent in FY20 per cent 13-14 to 30 per cent in FY2017-18. Portland Slag Cement and Portland Composite Cement collectively contribute to nearly 50 per cent of our product portfolio. Similarly, our clinker factor has come down to 63 per cent at current levels from about 81 per cent in 2013.
What has been the performance of Dalmia in the last two years in terms of TSR? What do you think about the next three years?
At the group level, we have touched 4 per cent TSR (Thermal Substitution Rate) compared to nearly 0.5 per cent five years ago. We have also developed pockets of excellence in some plants where nearly 18 per cent of TSR has been achieved. Presently, we are utilising various alternative fuels such as biomass, tyre nylon threads, carbon black, spent wash, paint sludge, spent carbon, sawdust as well as waste from cotton, plastic and footwear. While boosting the bottom line, these simultaneously curb GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions from cement operations. Moving forward, we are augmenting our fuel feeding systems with additional investments for making more use of both solid and liquid alternative fuels.
What do you think needs to be done urgently to improve the overall TSR numbers in the country?
Thermal Substitution Rate refers to the percentage of sustainable alternative fuels used in replacing fossil fuels. Commodity materials such as refuse-derived fuel (RDF) improve TSR percentage but lower investment payback. India is targeting 25 per cent TSR by 2025. Yet, compared to global standards (TSR of about 60 per cent to 100 per cent in many countries), we remain far behind. The main issues – waste characteristics and lack of support from the required agency for generating good segregated waste quality.
A circular economy is imperative for a sustainable future. Given its second-largest producer tag, India’s cement industry contributes to the circular process by handling different types of waste – whether it is steel industry slag, municipal solid waste or fly ash. The cement industry can be a mega player in waste management. In 2017-18, its production was 298 MTPA, which is expected to touch more than 550-600 MTPA by 2025. To meet this demand, it requires more than 51 million tonnes of coal that is already in short supply.
Besides, given the Centre’s Swachh Bharat Mission, we should use alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR). Along with the need for AFR, it is essential to use RDF along with other industrial waste, which is anyway a part of kiln feeds. Consequently, RDF offers an immense opportunity to boost the TSR of cement kilns, which could also save millions in foreign exchange due to lower coal imports. From 1 per cent a few years ago, the average TSR is now 4 per cent. The target is 25 per cent by 2025 and 30 per cent by 2030.
Are you handling industrial or any hazardous waste at any of the plants under your control? Kindly provide details.
The country’s cement industry is no longer as polluting or hazardous as some others since a complete transformation has occurred in this sector. A single visit to any of our sites will dispel any preconceived notions about cement plants being most polluting and hazardous.
The environmental emission norms mandated by the Government of India for the cement industry are at par with many developed countries. Cement is a basic building block and an essential glue that binds concrete – the world’s second-most consumed commodity after water. Nonetheless, when any industrial activity takes place on such a scale, some collateral impact on the environment cannot be ruled out. In recent years, however, the industry has made its operations significantly safer.
Overall, the industry is using waste more energy efficiently. The industry consumes almost 50 per cent of the country’s fly ash. Likewise, the steel industry’s entire BF Slag is used by our industry. Many cement plants in India are water positive. In other words, we are providing more water to nature than we take from it. The cement industry is growing by leaps and bounds in promoting sustainable business practices in India. Recently, international climate research rating agency CDP published their report on the global cement sector. CDP ranked six cement companies from India in the Top 10. Dalmia Cement has been ranked No.1 in the CDP report on business readiness for low carbon transition.
More than 65 per cent of cement production capacity in India comes under the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA). The main objective of GCCA is introducing sustainable business practices in the industry. Moreover, safety is the topmost priority. Typically, there is a major shift in providing a safe environment for our employees. Progressive cement companies are implementing a people-first policy, making the safety of workers a priority. Engagement in the supply chain is another area where much progress has been made. Various programmes such as defensive driving and driver passport system have been initiated for greater safety of workers, including during transport-related operations.
Provide more details on the platform created for handling hazardous waste.
Cement kilns deploy co-processing in waste disposal. Unlike landfilling and incineration, this practice is a more sustainable and environment-friendly waste disposal method thanks to the lower emissions and lack of residue after the treatment. Recently, our cement sector has made significant investments in ensuring a greener future via the enhanced use of AFR and other means. But the industry’s contribution is contingent on the progress of the nation’s overall waste management segment.
The progress on the AFR front has been robust, which includes the penetration of blended cements. While OPC (Ordinary Portland Cement) was the market leader in India earlier, today it has only around 20-25 per cent of market share. It is heartening that nearly 75 per cent of the nation’s cement production presently is in the form of various types of blended cement against barely 30 per cent in 1999-2000. The Indian cement industry has more potential to use alternative fuels than is being done currently. Yet, to achieve this, a complete transformation is required in India’s waste management sector from the generation point to disposal methods. Once implemented, the circular economy could become the backbone of India’s waste management practices. There is overwhelming customer acceptance of environment-friendly products. Many States have also come forward and developed policies for greater utilisation of blended cements. On our part, we are continuing policy advocacy and training of masons in using more blended cements and making them sensitive to environmental issues such as climate change. The use of industrial wastes in cement offers the technical advantages of improved durability and lower carbon footprint.
Can hazardous waste and other waste materials go together in the kiln or have to be moved separately?
Cement kilns use co-processing for waste disposal. Unlike landfilling and incineration, this is a more sustainable and environment-friendly waste disposal method due to lower emissions and lack of residue after the treatment. Thereby, waste materials in industrial processes are used as AFRs in recovering material and energy from them. These are fully utilised as a replacement for fossil fuels in cement kilns. Given the high temperatures in cement kilns, various kinds of wastes are disposed of effectively without harmful emissions by co-processing. In many countries, different types of plastic wastes are regularly disposed of in an environmentally-sound manner through co-processing. In essence, hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, which includes plastic wastes, are used as AFRs.
Nonetheless, care is required in selecting wastes and equipment, with trained personnel handling the co-processing of any waste. Tell us something about the pre-processing required for hazardous waste.
Conversion of Segregated Combustible Fraction (SCF) into RDF is done by a waste management operator at the existing waste management site. This comprises setting up a pre-processing facility with storage, shredding and blending operations. The cement company needs to establish a co-processing facility in the plant to ensure its viability. For the plant, the expenditure streams are the pre-processing cost and RDF transportation cost.
In utilising hazardous waste, enormous challenges arise since it’s necessary to have proper inputs from waste generators about the waste characteristics while having a proper material safety data sheet to understand the important precautions during transportation and usage of different wastes.
What has been your experience in moving waste across state borders after the introduction of GST? To what extent the movement has become less painful?
Overall, the introduction of GST has made transport of waste smoother besides reducing the compliance costs as well as complexity. Earlier, due to multiple state entry taxes and CST, it was more cost-effective in maintaining multiple warehouses in different states. But the higher number of warehouses meant most were operating below capacity, creating operational inefficiencies. GST has made this practice redundant as companies benefit by consolidating and maintaining warehouses wherever it is more beneficial. This has thus boosted operational efficiencies.
Additionally, there is a reduction in transit time as vehicles now spend less time idling at checkpoints. In turn, this has lowered logistics costs. Taking these factors into account, movement of waste is less cumbersome for cement companies today.
It is said processing of any kind of waste is not a problem but the issue is of logistics and getting waste at the plant at the right price. How do you think the problem can be solved?
For an industry holding 10 per cent global market share and as the third-largest volume product loader of the Indian Railways, multi-modal transport options are crucial. In comparison with other industries, as a per centage of sales, cement holds the highest logistics cost. This cost soars when the material is unloaded and transported further via road and if it is brought from or taken to the hinterland. The industry requires solutions for controlling transport costs since it comprises about 20% of retail cement prices. Therefore, automation of key processes vis-a-vis monitoring and controls could provide savings in freight costs. Some initiatives can include planned transport deploying intelligent algorithms as well as smart monitoring in implementing operations via GPS technologies.
Wherever possible, Railways should be used for transport as it is the most economical form. Such a focused approach can yield cost benefits. Meanwhile, initiatives are being undertaken by the Railways to ease movement of goods – whether raw materials or finished products. Development of mega stations and dedicated freight corridor will also be useful in boosting cement logistics. More cement manufacturers are now inking long-term freight contracts with the Railways, which will lead to a significant reduction in operating costs.
Do you think that Indian plants have been handling waste in a safe manner that will not cause harm to society in general?
While supply, segregation, quality and consistency are important in handling waste safely, segregation is the most important. Segregation and management at source are generally the best means of managing waste. Thereafter, waste quality and consistency are essential for effective disposal. While existing norms are adequate, the focus needs to be on proper implementation. Standardisation of waste disposal norms could facilitate greater safety while ensuring the cement sector leaves a lower carbon trail.
Concrete
UltraTech Cement expands green logistics with 600+ electric truck fleet
Published
7 days agoon
September 3, 2026By
admin
The e-truck fleet will be used to transport five million MT of clinker and other key materials with potential of over 1,17,000 tonnes of net annual CO₂ reduction, displacing the equivalent of 39 million litres of diesel per year.
Mumbai
UltraTech Cement Limited, an Aditya Birla Group company and the world’s largest cement company by sales volume and capacity outside China, has announced that it will scale up its electric vehicle fleet in its logistics operations to 600+ EV trucks by December 2026.
UltraTech has signed service contracts with leading EV prime mover manufacturers including Tata Motors, Ashok Leyland, IPLTech, Energy in Motion and Sany, along with their subsidiaries and other third-party logistics providers, to deploy EV trucks.
The total fleet of 600+ EV trucks will transport about five million MT of clinker and other key materials per annum across Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra and Odisha. Once fully operational, this fleet of over 600 EV trucks will enable a net annual CO₂ reduction of more than 1,17,000 tonnes, displacing the equivalent of 39 million litres of diesel per year.
K C Jhanwar, Managing Director, UltraTech Cement Limited, said, “UltraTech is expanding sustainability beyond its plants by adopting greener logistics solutions. This large-scale transition to green logistics underscores our focus on decarbonising every link of our value chain and supports our commitment to achieving Net Zero.”
UltraTech has been a pioneer in advancing sustainable transport in the cement sector, being the first cement company to deploy heavy-duty electric trucks for long-haul transport of clinker and other materials at scale. The company was among the first in India to introduce green logistics, deploying CNG trucks in 2021 and electric trucks in 2024. UltraTech currently operates 850+ trucks as part of its green logistics operations, including CNG and electric trucks.
UltraTech, with a grey cement capacity of over 200 MTPA in India, operates one of the country’s most complex logistics networks. Its electrification strategy covers the entire supply chain—from mine-to-plant movement to inter-plant transport of clinker and other key materials.
The $ 10 billion UltraTech, the cement flagship company of the Aditya Birla Group, has a total Grey Cement capacity of 205.5 MTPA and White Cement/Putty capacity of 3.2 MTPA. It is a signatory to the GCCA Climate Ambition 2050 and has committed to the Net Zero Concrete roadmap announced by GCCA.
In a research-backed article, Dr SB Hegde examines why carbon-adjusted profitability and LC3 will decide the next set of winners in cement manufacturing.
The Indian cement industry has achieved world-class operational efficiency through lower specific energy consumption, high plant utilisation and a reduced average clinker factor of approximately 67.5 per cent. These traditional measures of operational excellence remain essential. However, they are no longer sufficient. Carbon now carries a measurable financial cost under India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) and under European carbon markets. Future leadership will be defined by carbon-adjusted profitability, the ability to generate strong returns while systematically lowering the carbon intensity of every ton sold.
Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) offers a practical, scalable pathway to achieve this dual objective. By replacing up to 50 per cent of clinker with calcined clay and limestone, LC3 can reduce CO2 emissions by 30–40 per cent while delivering comparable or superior durability performance.
This article examines the technical foundations of LC3, European industrial practices, the emerging Indian carbon market and a concrete roadmap for Indian companies to embed carbon-adjusted metrics and LC3 into daily operations, incentives and commercial strategy.
Limits of traditional operational excellence
For many years, plant performance has been judged primarily by five indicators: specific heat consumption, specific power consumption, kiln and mill utilisation, clinker factor and overall equipment effectiveness. These metrics drove continuous improvement and helped the industry reduce energy use and increase the share of blended cement. Three structural changes have rendered them incomplete as sole measures of success.
First, carbon now carries a real or opportunity cost. Plants that improve volume or lower cash cost while raising or stagnating emissions intensity create a hidden liability that will surface as CCTS trading matures and as green procurement expands.
Second, lower-carbon products such as LC3 and high-performance blended cements are creating differentiated market segments. Customers in infrastructure, real estate and export-oriented construction are beginning to specify embodied-carbon limits.
Third, investors and lenders increasingly treat carbon intensity as a financial risk factor. Traditional KPIs can mask the divergence between short-term cash profit and long-term carbon-adjusted value.
What is carbon-adjusted profitability?
Carbon-adjusted profitability evaluates normal profit after explicit adjustment for carbon performance. A practical expression is:
Carbon-Adjusted EBITDA = Conventional EBITDA – Carbon Cost + Green Premium Income
Carbon cost may be an internal carbon price, the actual cost of purchasing Carbon Credit Certificates under CCTS, or the opportunity cost of high emissions relative to peers. Green premium income arises when customers pay more for verified lower-carbon cement or when the company sells surplus credits. Tracking both conventional and carbon-adjusted profit side-by-side gives management a clearer picture of value creation under evolving market rules.
Table 1. Traditional KPIs versus Carbon-Adjusted Leadership Metrics
Traditional Focus New Leadership Metric Why It Matters
Specific energy consumption Emissions intensity (kg CO2/t cement) Directly linked to future CCTS and CBAM costs
Kiln utilisation Carbon-adjusted contribution margin Reveals true value of incremental volume
Clinker factor Share of lower-carbon products sold (incl. LC3) Measures commercial success of the transition
Power cost per tonne Effective carbon cost per tonne sold Expose hidden liabilities
Absolute EBITDA Carbon-adjusted EBITDA + green premium Aligning profit with future market reality
LC3: Technical foundations and performance advantages
LC3 is a ternary blended cement that typically combines approximately 50 per cent clinker, 30 per cent calcined clay, 15 per cent limestone and 5 per cent gypsum (the classic LC3-50 formulation). The decisive technical advantage is that clay is calcined at 700–850 °C, far below the 1,450 °C required for clinker production. This lower temperature, together with the substantial reduction in clinker content, delivers CO2 reductions of 30–40 per cent relative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC).
Chemistry is synergistic. Calcined kaolinitic clay (metakaolin) reacts with calcium hydroxide from clinker hydration and with limestone to form additional C-A-S-H gel and carboaluminate phases. These phases densify the microstructure, reduce porosity and improve durability.
Field experience shows superior resistance to chloride ingress, sulphate attack and alkali–silica reaction. Early-age strength can match OPC with high-reactivity clays; later-age strengths routinely meet 42.5 and 52.5 grade requirements.
Importantly, LC3 does not require high-purity kaolin. Clays with 40 per cent or even lower kaolinite content can be activated successfully, expanding raw-material availability across India. Calcination can use adapted rotary kilns or dedicated flash calciners, making the technology compatible with existing plant infrastructure and far less capital-intensive than carbon capture.
Economic analyses show that LC3 can be produced at equal or lower cost than OPC in many locations because of reduced energy demand and cheaper clay. Life-cycle assessments consistently report 30–40 per cent lower embodied CO2 per tonne of cement.
Table 2. Comparative profile: OPC versus LC3-50
Parameter OPC LC3-50
Typical clinker content ~95 per cent ~50 per cent
CO2 emissions (relative) Baseline (≈0.85 t CO2/t cement process + fuel) 30–40 per cent lower
Clay calcination temperature Not applicable 700–850 °C
Key hydration products C-S-H, portlandite, ettringite C-A-S-H + carboaluminates
Chloride & sulphate resistance Good Superior
Production cost potential Baseline Equal or lower in most locations
Infrastructure compatibility Existing High (minor adaptations)
In India, commercial adoption has begun in earnest. JK Cement commenced the first commercial production of LC3 in the Indian subcontinent at its Mangrol plant in Rajasthan in 2025 under BIS standard IS 18189.
By early 2026, approximately 2,000 tonnes had been produced and sold, avoiding an estimated 500 tonnes of CO2. JK Lakshmi Cement followed with commercial launch of its Green PRO LC3 grade from the Jaykaypuram plant. As of mid-2026, two producers are supplying LC3 to the market. The first large-scale infrastructure application is the Noida International Airport (Jewar), where LC3 was used in the runway and a building complex, demonstrating full constructability and performance under demanding conditions. These early volumes are still small relative to national cement demand, but they mark the critical transition from pilot to commercial reality. Companies that scale capacity now will be positioned to capture both CCTS credits and emerging green-procurement demand.
Why the shift is accelerating
According to the World Bank’s State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026, direct carbon pricing now covers nearly 30 per cent of global greenhouse-gas emissions and generated more than US$107 billion in public revenue in 2025. The average global carbon price stands at approximately US$21 per tonne, although regional prices vary widely.
In Europe, the EU ETS price has traded near €80–85 per tonen in mid-2026. Free allocation for cement is being withdrawn in parallel with CBAM. European producers therefore face a clear signal: every tonne of avoided CO2 improves both compliance and competitiveness. Holcim has scaled calcined-clay production, including Europe’s first dedicated line at Saint-Pierre-la-Cour (France) and a second line in the Czech Republic (2026). Heidelberg Materials, Cementir (FUTURECEM) and others have commercialised low-clinker calcined-clay blends across multiple markets, showing that carbon-adjusted profitability is already reshaping capital allocation in the world’s most mature carbon market.India’s CCTS is now operational. Binding emission intensity targets apply to 186 cement facilities for FY 2025–26 and FY 2026–27. Average required reductions for integrated plants are modest (around 2.7 per cent by FY 2027), yet the direction is clear.
Trading of Carbon Credit Certificates is expected in the second half of 2026, with early prices likely in the `800–1,500 per tonne range. Plants that outperform targets can sell credits; those that underperform must buy them or face compensation. Cement is well positioned to be a net supplier of credits if clinker factor continues to fall through LC3 and other low-clinker systems.
Way forward for India
India starts from a strong baseline, world-class energy efficiency and a clinker factor already lower than the global average. The next competitive frontier is the deliberate reduction of process emissions through clinker substitution at scale. LC3 is uniquely suited to Indian conditions because suitable clays are widely distributed, the technology fits existing kiln and grinding infrastructure, and the resulting product can meet the performance demands of both infrastructure and building construction.
A practical national pathway contains five interlocking elements:
- Standards and acceptance: Accelerated finalisation and promotion of BIS specifications for calcined-clay and limestone–calcined-clay cements will remove a key barrier to commercial uptake. Alignment with European practice (EN 197-5) can facilitate knowledge transfer and export readiness.
- Supply-chain development: Investment in flash calcination capacity and systematic characterisation of regional clay deposits will secure reliable, low-cost feedstock. Existing rotary kilns can be adapted for initial volumes while dedicated calciners are built.
- Incentive alignment: Part of variable compensation for plant managers, sales teams and senior leadership should be linked to emissions intensity reduction and to the volume of lower-carbon products (including LC3) sold. Without this link, traditional volume and cost targets will continue to dominate behaviour.
- Product-level carbon accounting: Reliable measurement of emissions intensity at the individual cement grade level, supported by third-party verification where required, is essential for both CCTS compliance and credible green claims.
- Demand-side pull: Green public procurement policies that specify maximum embodied-carbon thresholds for major infrastructure projects will create a predictable market for LC3 and other low-carbon cements, accelerating scale and cost reduction.
Companies that treat LC3 as a strategic product line rather than a niche offering will be better positioned to generate surplus Carbon Credit Certificates, capture any emerging green premium, and protect margins as carbon costs rise.
Organisational changes required
Technical capability alone is insufficient. Three organisational shifts are required.
Daily management: Emissions intensity must appear on the same daily and monthly dashboards as heat consumption, power consumption and utilization. Plant reviews should examine both conventional and carbon-adjusted results.
Incentives: A meaningful portion of bonuses for plant heads, technical teams and sales leadership should be tied to lower emissions intensity and successful commercialisation of LC3 and other low-carbon grades.
Commercial approach: Sales teams need clear volume and pricing targets for lower-carbon products, supported by technical service that helps customers specify and place the material correctly. Without commercial pull, excellent technical performance remains under-utilised.
Table 3. Three-stage roadmap to carbon-adjusted profitability
Time Horizon Priority Actions Expected Outcome
Next 12 months Add emissions intensity to plant dashboards; establish internal carbon price; initiate LC3 pilot production and customer trials Visibility and early organisational learning
12–24 months Revise incentive systems; scale LC3 and other low-carbon grades to key accounts; secure third-party verification capability People and sales aligned with carbon goals
24–36 months Embed carbon-adjusted metrics in board reporting and capital allocation; expand calcined-clay capacity Full system integration and competitive advantage
Questions senior leaders should ask
Boards can accelerate the transition by insisting on answers to a short list of questions:
• Is our carbon-adjusted profit improving, stable or declining relative to conventional EBITDA?
• Did recent volume growth improve or worsen our emissions intensity?
• What share of sales already comes from lower-carbon products, including LC3, and what is the trajectory?
• How exposed is our capital expenditure plan to rising carbon costs under CCTS and potential CBAM-related requirements?
• Do our incentive systems still reward only volume and cost, or have they been updated to include carbon performance?
Treating carbon with the same seriousness as energy cost or kiln utilization does not diminish operational excellence; it expands the definition of excellence to match the new competitive reality.
Looking ahead
By 2030 the gap between leading and lagging cement companies will not be decided by who records the lowest specific heat consumption. It will be decided by who delivers the strongest carbon-adjusted profits.
Absolute emissions may still rise as national production grows. That is not the issue. Companies that reduce intensity year after year and successfully sell cleaner products will pull ahead in both domestic and export markets. Those that do not will fall behind, even if their traditional efficiency numbers look strong.
Operational excellence built the Indian cement industry. It remains the foundation. It is no longer the complete picture. Carbon-adjusted profitability is the clearer measure of success.
LC3 is not a distant technology. It is available now. It cuts CO3 by 30–40 per cent, works with existing plants, and is already in commercial production in India. Companies that treat it as a strategic product, not a pilot, will protect their margins and generate tradable credits.
Leaders who act now will place carbon metrics on daily dashboards, link incentives to intensity reduction and LC3 sales, invest in calcined-clay capacity, and build commercial capability to sell lower-carbon products. They will shape the next chapter of the industry.
References
- World Bank. (2026). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
- International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). (2026). India Carbon Credit Trading Scheme – Status and Coverage. Berlin: ICAP.
- Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Bureau of Energy Efficiency. (2025). Greenhouse Gases Emission Intensity Target Rules, 2025. New Delhi: Government of India.
- Scrivener, K., Martirena, F., Bishnoi, S., & Maity, S. (2018). Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 49–56.
- RMI. (2024). The Business Case for LC3. Rocky Mountain Institute.
- European Commission. (2026). EU Emissions Trading System – Allowance Price Data and Free Allocation Phase-out Schedule. Brussels.
- Holcim. (2025–2026). Scaling Calcined Clay for Sustainable Building – Corporate Updates on European and Latin American Capacity. Zurich: Holcim Ltd.
- LC3 Project / EPFL. (2026). LC3 – A Guide to Best Practices for Scalable, Affordable and Sustainable Low-Carbon Building. Lausanne: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
- Business Today / Industry Reports. (2026). First Large-Scale LC3 Application at Noida International Airport, Jewar. New Delhi.
- NITI Aayog / Industry Analyses. (2026). Roadmap and Baseline Performance Indicators for the Indian Cement Sector. New Delhi.
- Springer / Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. (2026). LC3 Systems: A Review of Chemistry, Performance, Durability and Sustainability toward Market Adoption.
- Cementir Holding / Industry Sources. (2025–2026). FUTURECEM and Related Low-Clinker Technologies in Europe.
- Climate Risk Horizons & Independent Analyses. (2026). Assessment of Emission Intensity Targets under India’s CCTS for Cement and Other Hard-to-Abate Sectors.
- GCCA / TERI. (Various years). Decarbonization Roadmaps for the Indian Cement Industry.
- EN 197-5:2021. Cement – Part 5: Portland-composite cement CEM II/C-M and Composite cement CEM VI. European Committee for Standardization.
Concrete
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
Published
2 weeks agoon
August 28, 2026By
admin
Dijam Panigrahi makes a counterintuitive but data-backed argument that routing every sensor alert through human approval does not make cement plants safer.
India’s cement industry has spent the last two years wiring kilns, mills and coolers with sensors and automated control systems, and the safety case for doing so is strong on paper. Contract workers still make up the majority of the industry’s workforce, and fatal accidents remain a recurring problem. The Indian National Cement Workers Federation has noted that around 83 per cent of workers in the sector hold precarious positions, a fact that resurfaced after an oxygen cylinder explosion killed three contract workers at a plant in Chhattisgarh.
Industry tallies compiled by IndustriALL found cement plants recorded at least seventeen accidents in one year with 21 workers killed, and ten accidents the following year with nine killed, most of them contract staff. Automated monitoring, in theory, closes that gap. A sensor never gets complacent and never skips a check because a shift is short staffed.
However, plants that respond by routing every anomaly reading to a person for approval are quietly building a system that fails the same way understaffing does. When operators receive dozens of flagged deviations a shift, most of them minor, they learn a simple lesson: the fastest way through the queue is to approve without reading closely. The safety benefit disappears, not because the technology failed, but because the humans supervising it adapted to the volume.
Why alerts get ignored
A study cited by manufacturing technology publisher Applied SmartFactory found more than 95 per cent of alarms in a semiconductor fab were low priority, and only about 4 per cent ever triggered an action, with just 100 out of 5,000 alarms accounting for 70 per cent of all alarm activity. The mechanism is the same whether the trigger is a vibration sensor or an AI model flagging a kiln temperature swing. Once the ratio of noise to signal crosses a threshold, workers stop treating the system as a decision aid and start treating it as a formality to clear.
The scale of AI deployment underway makes this more than a theoretical risk. Stanford’s 2026 AI Index Report found organisational adoption of AI has reached 88 per cent, even as documented AI incidents rose to 362 in 2025, up sharply from 233 the year before, according to analysis of the report. The Index also found only about a third of organisations have adopted a formal governance framework, with NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework cited by 33 per cent and ISO/IEC 42001 cited by 36 per cent.
Most manufacturers are deploying monitoring systems faster than they are building the judgment for when a flagged event actually needs a person’s attention. In India, plants run by JK Cement have begun pairing CCTV feeds with AI to define safe zones around heavy machinery, a promising direction that still depends on operators trusting and reading the alerts the system generates.
A three-tier model for cement plant
The fix is not less monitoring or more monitoring. It is classifying decisions by risk and by novelty, rather than treating human oversight as a single switch that is either on or off. A workable model sorts factory floor events into three tiers.
The first tier, proceed, covers deviations the plant has seen before that fall within known safe bounds, such as a kiln feed rate adjustment within an established range. These should run without a stop for approval, because routing them to a person only trains that person to click through.
The second tier, pause, covers events that are unusual but not yet dangerous, such as a vibration reading trending toward a limit or a fuel blend shifting outside its typical mix. These warrant a brief human check before the system proceeds, giving an operator the chance to apply judgment the model does not yet have.
The third tier, escalate, covers events that are both high risk and unfamiliar, such as a pressure reading combined with a temperature spike that has no close precedent in the plant’s history. These should stop the process entirely and require a decision from someone with the authority to shut down a line.
Who should set the threshold
Where these tiers get drawn matters as much as the framework itself. Threshold setting is frequently handed to the vendor supplying the monitoring software or to a plant’s IT department, both of which understand the technology but not the specific tolerances of a given kiln, mill or line. Operations staff, who know that a particular grinding unit runs hotter under monsoon humidity or that a calciner behaves differently after a refractory reline, are better positioned to calibrate what counts as routine on their own equipment.
Handing threshold ownership to operations does not remove IT or vendors from the process, but it puts the calibration decision closest to the people who live with its consequences on the floor.
Signals that oversight is actually working
A few concrete indicators reveal whether a monitoring setup is functioning as intended or simply providing the appearance of safety. The escalation rate over time is the first: a rate that stays flat or climbs slowly as operations mature is healthy, while one that spikes and then falls sharply often means operators have started overriding the system rather than engaging with it. Time to resolution is the second: escalations that take progressively longer to close suggest fatigue or confusion about ownership, not diligence. The third, and most telling, is how accurate the system’s own uncertainty estimates turn out to be, meaning whether events flagged as high risk actually correlated with real incidents, and whether events waved through stayed incident free. A system whose escalations do not track with actual outcomes trains operators toward the same complacency that unmonitored equipment produces.
None of this argues against automation in Indian cement manufacturing, where a labor structure built on contract work and a track record of serious accidents make better monitoring an urgent need. It argues for treating human oversight as a design problem with three distinct settings, rather than a single
dial turned up whenever a plant wants to look safer on paper.
About the author:
Dijam Panigrahi, Co-founder and COO, GridRaster, is a spatial computing platform for industrial enterprises and manufacturers.
Aditya Birla Group Launches Ultravolt Wires And Cables Business
Ramco Cements Mine Restoration Gets Global Biodiversity Certification
Central Technical Team To Survey Sites For Bhadradri Kothagudem Airport
Kirby India Breaks Ground on Fourth PEB Plant in Tamil Nadu
UltraTech to Deploy 600+ Electric Trucks by Dec 2026
Aditya Birla Group Launches Ultravolt Wires And Cables Business
Ramco Cements Mine Restoration Gets Global Biodiversity Certification
Central Technical Team To Survey Sites For Bhadradri Kothagudem Airport
Kirby India Breaks Ground on Fourth PEB Plant in Tamil Nadu

