Economy & Market
Innovating Energy
Published
5 months agoon
By
admin
Energy optimisation is a cornerstone of a smart cement plant, as it helps in lowering costs and cutting carbon. ICR delves into the different aspects that make a cement plant more energy efficient, accountable and sustainable.
The cement industry is among the most energy-intensive sectors globally, representing a critical frontier for energy efficiency gains. According to the International Energy Agency, global cement production today consumes roughly 100 kWh of electricity per tonne of cement, alongside thermal energy intensity of about 3.6 GJ per tonne of clinker. This energy intensity must fall to below 90 kWh and 3.4 GJ respectively by 2030 to align with Net-Zero trajectories.
India’s cement sector already stands out as relatively energy efficient. According to the OECD, the national average thermal energy consumption hovers at 725 kcal per kg of clinker (˜3.04 GJ/t), and electrical energy usage averages about 80 kWh per tonne of cement, both notably lower than the global averages of approximately 934 kcal/kg clinker and 107 kWh/t cement.
Still, there’s significant room for improvement. The Confederation of Indian Industry’s latest benchmarking shows that while average electrical energy consumption in the Indian cement sector has fallen from 88 kWh/tonne in 2014 to 73.75 kWh/tonne in 2023, the best-performing plants have pushed that down even further—to about 56 kWh/tonne of cement, and 675 kcal/kg of clinker in thermal terms. These figures spotlight the potential—and the urgency—for the rest of the industry to accelerate its energy efficiency trajectory.
Need for Energy Efficiency
Global energy efficiency is rightly dubbed the ‘first fuel’ in the clean-energy transition. According to the International Energy Agency, enhancing energy efficiency is the single most cost-effective and fastest route to cut CO2 emissions while lowering operational costs and strengthening energy security. Efficiency gains alone could fulfil up to 40 per cent of the greenhouse-gas reductions needed to meet Paris Agreement goals, making them indispensable for sectors like cement that are poised for long-term infrastructure growth.
Speaking about the need for cement manufacturers to invest in energy efficiency solutions, MM Rathi, Joint President, Power Management, Shree Cement, says, “Because it directly reduces operating costs, ensures compliance with tightening regulations, and strengthens carbon credentials at a time when financing and markets reward low-carbon players. With mature technologies and strong incentives available, delaying only increases both cost and risk.”
Uma Suryam, SVP and Head Manufacturing – Northern Region, Nuvoco Vistas, explains, “We adopt a comprehensive approach to measure and benchmark energy performance across our plants. Key metrics include Specific Heat Consumption (kCal/kg of clinker) and Specific Power Consumption (kWh/tonne of cement), which are continuously tracked against Best Available Technology (BAT) benchmarks, industry peers and global standards such as the WBCSD-CSI and CII benchmarks.
To ensure consistency and drive improvements, we conduct regular internal energy audits, leverage real-time dashboards and implement robust KPI tracking systems. These tools enable us to compare performance across plants effectively, identify optimisation opportunities and set actionable targets for energy efficiency and sustainability.”
Alex Nazareth, Whole-time Director and CEO, Innomotics India, expounds, “In the cement industry, the primary high-power applications are fans and mills. Among these, fans have the greatest potential for energy savings. Examples, the pre-heater fan, bag house fan, and cooler fans. When there are variations in airflow or the need to maintain a constant pressure in a process, using a variable speed drive (VSD) system is a more effective option for starting and controlling these fans. This adaptive approach can lead to significant energy savings. For instance, vanes and dampers can remain open while the variable frequency drive and motor system manage airflow regulation efficiently.”
In cement manufacturing, energy footprint looms large: production of this indispensable material accounts for 7–8 per cent of global CO2 emissions due to energy-intensive processes and raw-material calcination. A recent report by Reuters confirms that over half of cement’s emissions stem from clinker production, highlighting how inefficient
thermal operations translate directly into climate and cost concerns. In this context, every percentage
point of energy saved not only cuts fuel and electricity costs but also contributes meaningfully to decarbonisation efforts.
With regards to innovations in energy efficiency, Dr Avijit Mondal, Deputy General Manager (DGM), NTPC Energy Technology Research Alliance (NETRA), NTPC, exemplifies, “Cement manufacturing is among the most energy-intensive industrial processes, with continuous high loads from kilns, grinding mills, crushers and conveyors. Integrating a hybrid behind-the-meter microgrid offers a powerful solution to improve energy efficiency, reduce power costs and enhance operational resilience. A typical integrated cement plant can deploy a hybrid system comprising 8-15 MWp of rooftop and ground-mounted solar PV, 8-25 MW of waste heat recovery (WHR) capacity, and a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) sized for 15-30 minutes of peak plant load. In this configuration, solar PV supplies the daytime base load for processes like grinding and material transport, WHR delivers steady baseload power for kiln and cooler exhaust, and BESS handles ramping and flicker control.”
Barriers to Adoption
Rathi points out that the single biggest barrier is the high upfront capital cost and longer payback periods. According to a study published in PubMed Central, capital limitations are the third most significant barrier to sustainability transformation in the sector—particularly given the hefty investment and slow payback associated with energy projects such as waste-heat recovery systems (WHR) and captive power plants. The report highlights costs of approximately US$2.4 million per MW for WHR systems and US$1 million per MW for captive
power, making rapid returns challenging for many manufacturers.
Suryam shares, “Adopting energy-efficient technologies in brownfield cement plants presents a unique set of challenges due to the constraints of working within existing infrastructure. Another major challenge is minimising production disruptions during installation. Since brownfield plants are already operational, upgrades must be planned meticulously to avoid affecting output.”
Raman Bhatia, Founder and Managing Director, Servotech Renewable Power System, states, “Deploying large-scale solar solutions, comes with unique challenges that require careful planning and execution. One of the primary hurdles in such projects is the structural readiness of industrial rooftops, as they must be able to support the weight and scale of the installation while ensuring long-term safety and durability.”
Beyond financial constraints, there remains a glaring awareness and information gap across the industry. A 2017 report by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) identifies several non-financial barriers, including regulatory uncertainty, lack of project-level knowledge, limited access to sustainable energy financing and internal misalignment of priority between expansion projects and energy efficiency initiatives. Despite the strong long-term returns, energy-saving measures are often overshadowed due to lack of clarity, understanding or management focus within cement organisations.
Finally, the skills deficit stands is a major drag on energy efficiency deployment—not just in renewables but across industrial sectors including cement. According to Reuters, India’s clean energy ambitions are being undermined by an acute shortage of skilled professionals. In the solar industry alone, there’s a shortfall of around 1.2 million trained workers, a gap expected to grow by 2027. Without robust technical know-how—whether for installation, operations, digital monitoring or maintenance—cement plants struggle to implement and sustain efficiency technologies effectively.
Digital Transformation of Energy
Digital transformation is reshaping the cement industry, turning traditional analogue plants into data-driven operations. Internet of Things (IoT) and Industrial IoT (IIoT) systems are being deployed across operations to capture real-time data from kilns, mills, conveyors, and control systems. This information integrates into Energy Management Systems (EMS) that monitor consumption, optimise equipment use and quickly flag inefficiencies. Automation tools like VFDs, smart MCCs and sensors enable not just monitoring, but also proactive control of power-intensive assets—unlocking substantial energy savings through real-time adjustments.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is adding another layer of sophistication. According to industry estimates, AI in cement manufacturing can reduce energy consumption by up to 15 per cent and cut electricity usage by approximately 28 per cent, thanks to real-time monitoring and feedback loops. Moreover, smart cement plant research indicates that AI implementation can lower overall energy use by 22.7 per cent, reduce downtime by 75 per cent and improve clinker consistency by nearly 12 per cent. These gains underline how machine learning and process-optimisation algorithms can deliver both cost and carbon dividends in one go.
Referring to energy-efficient technologies as vital, Rathi states, “They will lower operating costs, enable decarbonisation and accelerate the shift toward digital, circular and low-carbon manufacturing, making energy efficiency the backbone of competitiveness and sustainability.”
Beyond AI, the rise of digital twins and advanced modelling is giving plant managers unprecedented foresight. Simulated virtual replicas of cement lines let operators test energy-saving scenarios without risking real-world performance. According to a report by Ramco, predictive quality analytics and kiln-fuel blending driven by machine learning enable optimal resource utilisation, lowering both energy consumption and emissions. These systems are especially promising where alternative fuels or clinker substitutes are used—helping ensure consistency and efficiency in challenging process conditions.
Citing the example of modern mineral processing with digital technology, Karen Thompson, President, Haver & Boecker Niagara’s North American and Australian Operations, referred to Artificial intelligence (AI) as a practical tool that’s reshaping how quarries operate. “One of the most impactful applications is in predictive analytics. Unplanned downtime not only disrupts production but also leads to increased energy use, emergency repairs and premature equipment disposal — all of which have environmental consequences. Predictive maintenance technologies help mitigate these risks. Tools like condition monitoring and vibration analysis use wireless sensors to continuously assess equipment health,” she states.
Smart energy management tools powered by IIoT are bridging operations, maintenance, and strategic dashboards. ABB’s Ability™ Knowledge Manager, for instance, allows integration of production, downtime, quality, energy, and emissions data into a unified platform—and deliver insights even via mobile access. A leading Indian cement producer implemented the suite across multiple plants, achieving ROI in just eight months, cutting costs by 3-5 per cent and extending asset lifecycles—demonstrating how digital tools are central to modernising
energy management.
The Green Route
In an industry where energy constitutes up to 40 per cent of production costs, unlocking free sources of power can be a game-changer. Waste Heat Recovery Systems (WHRS) tap into high-temperature exhaust—like kiln preheater gases—and convert up to 30 per cent of a plant’s electricity needs into usable power, using steam turbines or Rankine cycles. A report by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy mentions that the Indian cement sector possesses a WHRS potential of nearly 1.3 GW, which could annually reduce coal use by approximately 8.6 million tonnes and cut 12.8 million tonnes of CO2 emissions.
Commenting about viable renewable energy solutions, Ghosh says, “Cement industry is a continuous process industry with high power intensity. It requires green, reliable and cost-effective power solutions. Historically, cement plants have preferred the group captive model given the scale of power requirement. From a green power solutions perspective, round-the-clock solutions with a mix of solar, wind and battery storage (or PSP storage) are best suited to meet the power needs of the cement industry. With reduction in battery CAPEX and further learning curves, we see the cost effectiveness of RTC solutions continues to improve in the near term. An important element to make this competitive is to size the configuration based on very granular analytics, such as optimisation of the battery cycling rate through the life of the plant.”
“Most energy efficiency measures are also value accretive. In fact, if you were to draw the marginal abatement cost curve – you will find that >50 per cent of measures to reduce carbon footprint also being in cost reduction, which is a win-win. This is true not just for cement plant operations but across the value chain including logistics. For example, reducing the per tonne per kilometre (PTPK) costs also help in significant carbon footprint reduction which can be achieved by improving packing efficiencies, route optimisation, etc. Hence, energy efficiency helps improve the cost competitiveness in heavy industries and is not contrarian in nature,” he added.
Narrowing down on solar energy, Bhatia shares, “Our patented peak-shaving technology is designed to optimise energy usage efficiency by reducing costly demand spikes that are common in energy-intensive operations. In industries like cement manufacturing, where power consumption can suddenly surge due to heavy machinery, these peaks often translate into higher demand charges on electricity bills. By intelligently managing when and how energy is drawn from the grid and dispatching battery energy storage (BESS) during peak grid usage, we ensure smoother load profiles, lower costs and mitigate tariff exposure.”
Despite its promise, WHRS adoption isn’t universal. A report by ICRA indicates that Indian cement producers plan to invest around Rs.1,400–1,700 crore by FY2022 to add 175 MW of WHRS capacity, which brings the cumulative installed base to 520 MW—covering only about 16 per cent of their power needs. However, the low marginal power cost from WHRS—at just around Rs.1-1.5 per kWh compared to Rs.4.5–5 for captive thermal power—delivers an estimated 14-18 per cent reduction in power expenses, boosting operating margins by 1.1-1.4 percentage points.
Parallel to WHRS, alternative fuels and raw materials are creating dual efficiencies by cutting both energy demand and raw-material inputs. According to CMA, India’s sector-wide Thermal Substitution Rate (TSR) has grown from 0.6 per cent in 2010 to 4 per cent in 2017, with some plants achieving TSR levels of 25-35 per cent using Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF), agro-waste, sludge and other residues. These co-processing strategies lower dependence on fossil fuels and reduce environmental impacts — moving both raw materials and energy into a more circular usage cycle.
Looking ahead, the synergy between efficiency gains and circular economy gains positions cement firms for long-term competitiveness. WHRS delivers an immediate reduction in operational cost and carbon footprint, while alternative fuel and raw-material integration opens pathways for regulatory resilience, lower input costs and brand differentiation in a sustainability-conscious market. Yet realising their full potential requires overcoming technical challenges, scaling effective logistics and embracing policy frameworks that support both waste valorisation and energy innovation.
Energy Audits
Energy audits serve as foundational tools in the pursuit of operational efficiency within the cement sector, spotlighting precisely where energy is being wasted and where savings can be unlocked. A detailed study by the National Council for Cement and Building Materials (NCB) revealed that kilns are sometimes operated with heat consumption as high as 850 kcal/kg clinker, whereas the industry’s best-performing plants function around 675-685 kcal/kg clinker. Energy audits helped bridge this gap by pinpointing inefficiencies like cooler losses and false air entry—in one case, a reduction of just five kcal/kg clinker yielded annual cost savings of approximately Rs.45-50 lakh for a 1 Mtpa plant. A report by NCB underscores this: energy audits can deliver substantial returns by diagnosing hidden inefficiencies and guiding corrective actions.
Complementing audits, benchmarking empowers cement producers to realistically gauge their energy performance against industry leaders. According to the latest CII benchmarking manual, while
average electrical consumption stands at 73.75 kWh/MT cement, the top 10 plants operate at an impressively efficient 56.14 kWh/MT. Similarly, thermal benchmarks show a gap—from the sector average of 726 kcal/kg clinker to best-in-class levels around 675 kcal/kg. These metrics allow companies to set ambitious yet achievable targets, fostering continuous improvement and motivating strategic investments in efficiency technologies.
Data plays a crucial role in this process.
Debabrata Ghosh, Head of India, Aurora Energy Research, states, “Advanced analytics has several use cases to enhance cement plant performance in improving quality, increasing throughput and reducing cost thereby improving margins/ realisations. Use cases differ by part of the process. Availability of granular and high-quality data captured real time through effective information systems is the primary requisite. Typically, use cases with low effort and high impact should be prioritised to capture low hanging fruits. Structural, big-ticket solutions typically bring about medium term impact on either/ all the three metrics.”
Skill Development for Efficiency
India’s hammering of energy efficiency in manufacturing hinges critically on skilled manpower—a resource that remains alarmingly sparse. According to a Reuters report titled ‘Skills shortage hobbles India’s clean energy aspirations,’ the renewable sector faces a skill gap of approximately 1.2 million workers, projected to rise to 1.7 million by 2027, severely impacting deployment and operational effectiveness of technologies like solar, wind and energy-efficient systems. As clean-energy integration grows, this shortage threatens to stall progress across sectors—including cement—where specialised knowledge in automation, digital monitoring and system optimisation is increasingly indispensable.
Within the cement industry itself, the urgency for upskilling is clear. A recent industry snapshot by ZIPDO Education reveals that 48 per cent of workers feel unprepared for the digital transformation of their plants, while 53 per cent lack basic digital literacy, and 58 per cent report shortages in AI and data analytics skills. However, the same report also signals momentum: 72 per cent of cement firms anticipate expanding digital training programs by 2025, and 80 per cent deem reskilling essential to meet sustainability goals. These figures underscore both the magnitude of the gap and the growing recognition that skill development is no longer optional—but foundational to staying energy-competitive.
OEMs, EPCs and Cement Producers Collaboration
Strategic collaboration between Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), Engineering-Procurement-Construction (EPC) firms and cement producers is proving to be a game-changer in operational efficiency. For instance, a case highlighted in Indian Cement Review recounts how JK Cement’s switch to Mobil SHC™ 632 premium lubricants—not just designed but optimised in coordination with OEM partners—enhanced gearbox efficiency by about 0.8 per cent, saved 263 litres of oil, and delivered cost savings of US$18,764 (Rs.13.1 lakh) annually. This partnership model underscores how nuanced inputs from technical suppliers, paired with operational insights from plant engineers, can translate directly into energy and cost gains.
Similarly, EPC collaborations are demonstrating real traction in energy optimisation. At a leading cement producer’s site in Rajasthan, EPC partner Thermax implemented a blend of operational and capital interventions—like Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) and auto-control flow logics—for both captive power and WHRS. The results were tangible: cost savings of Rs.7.24 million from capex and Rs.1.88 million from opex in the captive plant, plus Rs.870,000 and Rs.190,000 respectively in the WHR facility. This affirms how EPC-led evaluation and targeted upgrades can yield substantial efficiency returns.
Long Term ROI
In the long run, energy-efficient systems are not merely cost-saving tools—they are strategic investments with powerful paybacks. According to an ICRA report, Indian cement companies planned to deploy 175 MW of Waste Heat Recovery Systems (WHRS) by FY 2021–22, involving a total investment of Rs.1,400–1,700 crore. This investment is expected to widen operating margins by 1.10-1.40 per cent, as WHRS-powered electricity costs just Rs.1.3-Rs.1.5 per kWh, compared to Rs.4.5-Rs.5 per kWh for conventional captive thermal power. Furthermore, Global Cement’s market analysis reveals that WHRS-generated power typically comes in at just US$0.02/kWh, significantly lower than the ~US$0.70/kWh from coal-based captive plants, which allows for around 15 per cent savings in power costs when covering 25 per cent of capacity.
Beyond direct savings, integrating energy-efficient technologies like WHRS or advanced refractories contributes materially to carbon footprint reduction, bolstering ESG performance and potentially unlocking regulatory or market advantages. A detailed case study published by Indian Cement Review in 2024 notes that upgrading kiln burning zones with high-insulation refractories can reduce fuel consumption by 6 per cent, translating into annual savings of roughly `3.5 crore for a 6,000 TPD kiln. The switch also results in an estimated 0.1 tonne of CO2 reduction per tonne of clinker, highlighting how operational efficiencies can create both cost and carbon dividends.
Conclusion
Energy efficiency in cement manufacturing is no longer just a choice—it is an imperative for competitiveness, compliance, and climate responsibility. From waste heat recovery systems to digital transformation and advanced refractories, the sector has already demonstrated that operational savings and carbon reductions can go hand in hand. According to ICRA, WHRS investments alone can expand operating margins by 1.10-1.40 per cent for Indian cement players, showing that the financial case for efficiency is robust. These tangible benefits are proving that efficiency measures are not incremental improvements but transformative enablers for long-term resilience.
At the same time, the industry must overcome barriers such as high upfront costs, limited awareness and skill gaps. Energy audits, benchmarking practices and collaborations between OEMs, EPC contractors and cement producers are emerging as essential tools to bridge these gaps. As noted in multiple case studies, even relatively modest upgrades—such as switching to high-performance refractories—can yield significant savings in fuel costs and emissions reductions. These wins create a strong foundation upon which deeper decarbonisation strategies can be built.
Looking ahead, the integration of emerging technologies—AI, IoT and smart energy management—will further optimise cement operations. Combined with alternative fuels, raw materials and large-scale carbon capture, these innovations are positioning the industry to drastically lower its energy intensity and carbon footprint. The pace of adoption will determine how quickly the sector transitions from incremental efficiency gains to systemic decarbonisation. With India expected to double its cement demand by 2030, scaling these solutions is both a necessity and an opportunity.
The future of cement lies in aligning energy efficiency with the global net-zero agenda. By 2050, achieving net-zero cement production will require a mix of aggressive efficiency measures, deep electrification, large-scale use of alternative fuels and breakthrough technologies such as CCUS. The journey is complex, but the direction is clear: energy efficiency is not only the first step but also the cornerstone of a sustainable cement industry. Those who act decisively today will not only cut costs and carbon but also secure their place as leaders in a net-zero future.– Kanika Mathur
Concrete
Refractory demands in our kiln have changed
Published
3 days agoon
February 20, 2026By
admin
Radha Singh, Senior Manager (P&Q), Shree Digvijay Cement, points out why performance, predictability and life-cycle value now matter more than routine replacement in cement kilns.
As Indian cement plants push for higher throughput, increased alternative fuel usage and tighter shutdown cycles, refractory performance in kilns and pyro-processing systems is under growing pressure. In this interview, Radha Singh, Senior Manager (P&Q), Shree Digvijay Cement, shares how refractory demands have evolved on the ground and how smarter digital monitoring is improving kiln stability, uptime and clinker quality.
How have refractory demands changed in your kiln and pyro-processing line over the last five years?
Over the last five years, refractory demands in our kiln and pyro line have changed. Earlier, the focus was mostly on standard grades and routine shutdown-based replacement. But now, because of higher production loads, more alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR) usage and greater temperature variation, the expectation from refractory has increased.
In our own case, the current kiln refractory has already completed around 1.5 years, which itself shows how much more we now rely on materials that can handle thermal shock, alkali attack and coating fluctuations. We have moved towards more stable, high-performance linings so that we don’t have to enter the kiln frequently for repairs.
Overall, the shift has been from just ‘installation and run’ to selecting refractories that give longer life, better coating behaviour and more predictable performance under tougher operating conditions.
What are the biggest refractory challenges in the preheater, calciner and cooler zones?
• Preheater: Coating instability, chloride/sulphur cycles and brick erosion.
• Calciner: AFR firing, thermal shock and alkali infiltration.
• Cooler: Severe abrasion, red-river formation and mechanical stress on linings.
Overall, the biggest challenge is maintaining lining stability under highly variable operating conditions.
How do you evaluate and select refractory partners for long-term performance?
In real plant conditions, we don’t select a refractory partner just by looking at price. First, we see their past performance in similar kilns and whether their material has actually survived our operating conditions. We also check how strong their technical support is during shutdowns, because installation quality matters as much as the material itself.
Another key point is how quickly they respond during breakdowns or hot spots. A good partner should be available on short notice. We also look at their failure analysis capability, whether they can explain why a lining failed and suggest improvements.
On top of this, we review the life they delivered in the last few campaigns, their supply reliability and their willingness to offer plant-specific custom solutions instead of generic grades. Only a partner who supports us throughout the life cycle, which includes selection, installation, monitoring and post-failure analysis, fits our long-term requirement.
Can you share a recent example where better refractory selection improved uptime or clinker quality?
Recently, we upgraded to a high-abrasion basic brick at the kiln outlet. Earlier we had frequent chipping and coating loss. With the new lining, thermal stability improved and the coating became much more stable. As a result, our shutdown interval increased and clinker quality remained more consistent. It had a direct impact on our uptime.
How is increased AFR use affecting refractory behaviour?
Increased AFR use is definitely putting more stress on the refractory. The biggest issue we see daily is the rise in chlorine, alkalis and volatiles, which directly attack the lining, especially in the calciner and kiln inlet. AFR firing is also not as stable as conventional fuel, so we face frequent temperature fluctuations, which cause more thermal shock and small cracks in the lining.
Another real problem is coating instability. Some days the coating builds too fast, other days it suddenly drops, and both conditions impact refractory life. We also notice more dust circulation and buildup inside the calciner whenever the AFR mix changes, which again increases erosion.
Because of these practical issues, we have started relying more on alkali-resistant, low-porosity and better thermal shock–resistant materials to handle the additional stress coming from AFR.
What role does digital monitoring or thermal profiling play in your refractory strategy?
Digital tools like kiln shell scanners, IR imaging and thermal profiling help us detect weakening areas much earlier. This reduces unplanned shutdowns, helps identify hotspots accurately and allows us to replace only the critical sections. Overall, our maintenance has shifted from reactive to predictive, improving lining life significantly.
How do you balance cost, durability and installation speed during refractory shutdowns?
We focus on three points:
• Material quality that suits our thermal profile and chemistry.
• Installation speed, in fast turnarounds, we prefer monolithic.
• Life-cycle cost—the cheapest material is not the most economical. We look at durability, future downtime and total cost of ownership.
This balance ensures reliable performance without unnecessary expenditure.
What refractory or pyro-processing innovations could transform Indian cement operations?
Some promising developments include:
• High-performance, low-porosity and nano-bonded refractories
• Precast modular linings to drastically reduce shutdown time
• AI-driven kiln thermal analytics
• Advanced coating management solutions
• More AFR-compatible refractory mixes
These innovations can significantly improve kiln stability, efficiency and maintenance planning across the industry.
Concrete
Digital supply chain visibility is critical
Published
3 days agoon
February 20, 2026By
admin
MSR Kali Prasad, Chief Digital and Information Officer, Shree Cement, discusses how data, discipline and scale are turning Industry 4.0 into everyday business reality.
Over the past five years, digitalisation in Indian cement manufacturing has moved decisively beyond experimentation. Today, it is a strategic lever for cost control, operational resilience and sustainability. In this interview, MSR Kali Prasad, Chief Digital and Information Officer, Shree Cement, explains how integrated digital foundations, advanced analytics and real-time visibility are helping deliver measurable business outcomes.
How has digitalisation moved from pilot projects to core strategy in Indian cement manufacturing over the past five years?
Digitalisation in Indian cement has evolved from isolated pilot initiatives into a core business strategy because outcomes are now measurable, repeatable and scalable. The key shift has been the move away from standalone solutions toward an integrated digital foundation built on standardised processes, governed data and enterprise platforms that can be deployed consistently across plants and functions.
At Shree Cement, this transition has been very pragmatic. The early phase focused on visibility through dashboards, reporting, and digitisation of critical workflows. Over time, this has progressed into enterprise-level analytics and decision support across manufacturing and the supply chain,
with clear outcomes in cost optimisation, margin protection and revenue improvement through enhanced customer experience.
Equally important, digital is no longer the responsibility of a single function. It is embedded into day-to-day operations across planning, production, maintenance, despatch and customer servicing, supported by enterprise systems, Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) data platforms, and a structured approach to change management.
Which digital interventions are delivering the highest ROI across mining, production and logistics today?
In a capital- and cost-intensive sector like cement, the highest returns come from digital interventions that directly reduce unit costs or unlock latent capacity without significant capex.
Supply chain and planning (advanced analytics): Tools for demand forecasting, S&OP, network optimisation and scheduling deliver strong returns by lowering logistics costs, improving service levels, and aligning production with demand in a fragmented and regionally diverse market.
Mining (fleet and productivity analytics): Data-led mine planning, fleet analytics, despatch discipline, and idle-time reduction improve fuel efficiency and equipment utilisation, generating meaningful savings in a cost-heavy operation.
Manufacturing (APC and process analytics): Advanced Process Control, mill optimisation, and variability reduction improve thermal and electrical efficiency, stabilise quality and reduce rework and unplanned stoppages.
Customer experience and revenue enablement (digital platforms): Dealer and retailer apps, order visibility and digitally enabled technical services improve ease of doing business and responsiveness. We are also empowering channel partners with transparent, real-time information on schemes, including eligibility, utilisation status and actionable recommendations, which improves channel satisfaction and market execution while supporting revenue growth.
Overall, while Artificial Intelligence (AI) and IIoT are powerful enablers, it is advanced analytics anchored in strong processes that typically delivers the fastest and most reliable ROI.
How is real-time data helping plants shift from reactive maintenance to predictive and prescriptive operations?
Real-time and near real-time data is driving a more proactive and disciplined maintenance culture, beginning with visibility and progressively moving toward prediction and prescription.
At Shree Cement, we have implemented a robust SAP Plant Maintenance framework to standardise maintenance workflows. This is complemented by IIoT-driven condition monitoring, ensuring consistent capture of equipment health indicators such as vibration, temperature, load, operating patterns and alarms.
Real-time visibility enables early detection of abnormal conditions, allowing teams to intervene before failures occur. As data quality improves and failure histories become structured, predictive models can anticipate likely failure modes and recommend timely interventions, improving MTBF and reducing downtime. Over time, these insights will evolve into prescriptive actions, including spares readiness, maintenance scheduling, and operating parameter adjustments, enabling reliability optimisation with minimal disruption.
A critical success factor is adoption. Predictive insights deliver value only when they are embedded into daily workflows, roles and accountability structures. Without this, they remain insights without action.
In a cost-sensitive market like India, how do cement companies balance digital investment with price competitiveness?
In India’s intensely competitive cement market, digital investments must be tightly linked to tangible business outcomes, particularly cost reduction, service improvement, and faster decision-making.
This balance is achieved by prioritising high-impact use cases such as planning efficiency, logistics optimisation, asset reliability, and process stability, all of which typically deliver quick payback. Equally important is building scalable and governed digital foundations that reduce the marginal cost of rolling out new use cases across plants.
Digitally enabled order management, live despatch visibility, and channel partner platforms also improve customer centricity while controlling cost-to-serve, allowing service levels to improve without proportionate increases in headcount or overheads.
In essence, the most effective digital investments do not add cost. They protect margins by reducing variability, improving planning accuracy, and strengthening execution discipline.
How is digitalisation enabling measurable reductions in energy consumption, emissions, and overall carbon footprint?
Digitalisation plays a pivotal role in improving energy efficiency, reducing emissions and lowering overall carbon intensity.
Real-time monitoring and analytics enable near real-time tracking of energy consumption and critical operating parameters, allowing inefficiencies to be identified quickly and corrective actions to be implemented. Centralised data consolidation across plants enables benchmarking, accelerates best-practice adoption, and drives consistent improvements in energy performance.
Improved asset reliability through predictive maintenance reduces unplanned downtime and process instability, directly lowering energy losses. Digital platforms also support more effective planning and control of renewable energy sources and waste heat recovery systems, reducing dependence on fossil fuels.
Most importantly, digitalisation enables sustainability progress to be tracked with greater accuracy and consistency, supporting long-term ESG commitments.
What role does digital supply chain visibility play in managing demand volatility and regional market dynamics in India?
Digital supply chain visibility is critical in India, where demand is highly regional, seasonality is pronounced, and logistics constraints can shift rapidly.
At Shree Cement, planning operates across multiple horizons. Annual planning focuses on capacity, network footprint and medium-term demand. Monthly S&OP aligns demand, production and logistics, while daily scheduling drives execution-level decisions on despatch, sourcing and prioritisation.
As digital maturity increases, this structure is being augmented by central command-and-control capabilities that manage exceptions such as plant constraints, demand spikes, route disruptions and order prioritisation. Planning is also shifting from aggregated averages to granular, cost-to-serve and exception-based decision-making, improving responsiveness, lowering logistics costs and strengthening service reliability.
How prepared is the current workforce for Industry 4.0, and what reskilling strategies are proving most effective?
Workforce preparedness for Industry 4.0 is improving, though the primary challenge lies in scaling capabilities consistently across diverse roles.
The most effective approach is to define capability requirements by role and tailor enablement accordingly. Senior leadership focuses on digital literacy for governance, investment prioritisation, and value tracking. Middle management is enabled to use analytics for execution discipline and adoption. Frontline sales and service teams benefit from
mobile-first tools and KPI-driven workflows, while shop-floor and plant teams focus on data-driven operations, APC usage, maintenance discipline, safety and quality routines.
Personalised, role-based learning paths, supported by on-ground champions and a clear articulation of practical benefits, drive adoption far more effectively than generic training programmes.
Which emerging digital technologies will fundamentally reshape cement manufacturing in the next decade?
AI and GenAI are expected to have the most significant impact, particularly when combined with connected operations and disciplined processes.
Key technologies likely to reshape the sector include GenAI and agentic AI for faster root-cause analysis, knowledge access, and standardisation of best practices; industrial foundation models that learn patterns across large sensor datasets; digital twins that allow simulation of process changes before implementation; and increasingly autonomous control systems that integrate sensors, AI, and APC to maintain stability with minimal manual intervention.
Over time, this will enable more centralised monitoring and management of plant operations, supported by strong processes, training and capability-building.
Concrete
Cement Additives for Improved Grinding Efficiency
Published
3 days agoon
February 20, 2026By
admin
Shreesh A Khadilkar discusses how advanced additive formulations allow customised, high-performance and niche cements—offering benefits while supporting blended cements and long-term cost and carbon reduction.
Cement additives are chemicals (inorganic and organic) added in small amounts (0.01 per cent to 0.2 per cent by weight) during cement grinding. Their main job? Reduce agglomeration, prevent pack-set, and keep the mill running smoother. Thus, these additions primarily improve, mill thru-puts, achieve lower clinker factor in blended cements PPC/PSC/PCC. Additionally, these additives improve concrete performance of cements or even for specific special premium cements with special USPs like lower setting times or for reduced water permeability in the resultant cement mortars and concrete (water repellent /permeation resistant cements), corrosion resistance etc.
The cement additives are materials which could be further differentiated as:
Grinding aids:
• Bottlenecks in cement grinding capacity, such materials can enhance throughputs
• Low specific electrical energy consumption during cement grinding
• Reduce “Pack set” problem and improve powder flowability
Quality improvers:
• Opportunity for further clinker factor reduction
• Solution for delayed cement setting or strength development issues at early or later ages.
Others: materials which are used for specific special cements with niche properties as discussed in the subsequent pages.
When cement additives are used as grinding aids or quality improvers, in general the additives reduce the inter-particle forces; reduce coating over grinding media and mill internals. Due to creation of like charges on cement particles, there is decreased agglomeration, much improved flowability, higher generation of fines better dispersion of particles in separator feed and reduction of mill filling level (decrease of residence time). However, in VRM grinding; actions need to be taken to have stable bed formation on the table.
It has been reported in literature and also substantiated by a number of detailed evaluations of different cement additive formulations in market, that the cement additive formulations are a combination of different chemical compounds, typically composed of:
- Accelerator/s for the hydration reaction of cements which are dependent on the acceleration effect desired in mortar compressive strengths at early or later ages, the choice of the materials is also dependent on clinker quality and blending components (flyash / slag) or a mix of both.
- Water reducer / workability / wet-ability enhancer, which would show impact on the resultant cement mortars and concrete. Some of the compounds (retarders) like polysaccharide derivatives, gluconates etc., show an initial retarding action towards hydration which result in reducing the water requirements for the cements thus act as water reducers, or it could be some appropriate polymeric molecules which show improved wet-ability and reduce water demand. These are selected based on the mineral component and type of cements (PPC/PSC /PCC).
- Grinding aids: Compounds that work as Grinding Aid i.e. which would enhance Mill thru-put on one hand as well as would increase the early strengths due to the higher fines generation/ or activation of cement components. These compounds could be like alkanol-amines such as TIPA, DEIPA, TEA etc. or could be compounds like glycols and other poly-ols, depending on whether it is OPC or PPC or PSC or PCC manufacture.
Mechanism of action — Step By Step—
- Reduce Agglomeration, Cement particles get electrostatically charged during grinding, stick together, form “flocs”, block mill efficiency, waste energy. Grinding aid molecules adsorb onto particle surfaces, neutralise charge, prevent re-agglomeration.
- Improve Powder Flowability, Adsorbed molecules create a lubricating layer, particles slide past each other easier, better mill throughput, less “dead zone” buildup.
Also reduces caking on mill liners, diaphragms, and separator screens, less downtime for cleaning. - Enhance Grinding Efficiency (Finer Product Faster), By preventing agglomeration, particles stay dispersed more surface area exposed to grinding media, finer grind achieved with same energy input, Or: same fineness achieved with less energy, huge savings.
Example:
• Without aid ? 3500 cm²/g Blaine needs 40 kWh/ton
• With use of optimum grinding aid same fineness at 32 kWh/ton 20 per cent energy savings - Reduce Pack Set and Silo Caking Grinding aids (GA) inhibit hydration of free lime (CaO) during storage prevents premature hardening or “pack set” in silos. especially critical in humid climates or with high free lime clinker.
It may be stated here that Overdosing of GA can cause: – Foaming in mill (especially with glycols) reduces grinding efficiency, retardation of cement setting (especially with amines/acids), odor issues (in indoor mills) – Corrosion of mill components (if acidic aids used improperly)
The best practice to optimise use of GA is Start with 0.02 per cent to 0.05 per cent dosage test fineness, flow, and set time adjust up/down. Due to static charge of particles, the sample may stick to the sides of sampler pipe and so sampling need to be properly done.
Depending on type of cements i.e. OPC, PPC, PSC, PCC, the grinding aids combinations need to be optimised, a typical Poly carboxylate ether also could be a part of the combo grinding aids
Cement additives for niche properties of the cement in concrete.
The cement additives can also be tailor made to create specific niche properties in cements, OPC, PPC, PSC and PCC to create premium or special brands. The special niche properties of the cement being its additional USP of such cement products, and are useful for customers to build a durable concrete structure with increased service life.
Such properties could be:
• Additives for improved concrete performance of cements, high early strength in PPC/PSC/PCC, much reduced water demand in cement, cements with improved slump retentivity in concrete, self-compacting, self levelling in concrete, cements with improved adhesion property of the cement mortar
• Water repellence / water proofing, permeability resistance in mortars and concrete.
• Biocidal cement
• Photo catalytic cements
• Cements with negligible ASR reactions etc.
Additives for cements for improved concrete performance
High early strengths: Use of accelerators. These are chemical compounds which enhance the degree of hydration of cement. These can include setting or hardening accelerators depending on whether their action occurs in the plastic or hardened state respectively. Thus, the setting accelerators reduce the setting time, whereas the hardening accelerators increase the early age strengths. The setting accelerators act during the initial minutes of the cement hydration, whereas the hardening accelerators act mainly during the initial days of hydration.
Chloride salts are the best in class. However, use of chloride salts as hardening accelerators are strongly discouraged for their action in promoting the corrosion of rebar, thus, chloride-free accelerators are preferred. The hardening accelerators could be combinations of compounds like nitrate, nitrite and thiocyanate salts of alkali or alkaline earth metals or thiosulphate, formate, and alkanol amines depending on the cement types.
However, especially in blended cements (PPC/PSC/PCC the increased early strengths invariably decrease the 28 day strengths. These aspects lead to creating combo additives along with organic polymers to achieve improved early strengths as well as either same or marginally improved 28 days strengths with reduced clinker factor in the blended cement, special OPC with reduced admixture requirements. With use of appropriate combination of inorganic and organic additives we could create an OPC with substantially reduced water demand or improved slump retentivity. Use of such an OPC would show exceptional concrete performance in high grade concretes as it would exhibit lower admixture requirements in High Grade Concretes.
PPC with OPC like properties: With the above concept we could have a PPC, having higher percentage flyash, with a combo cement additive which would have with concrete performance similar to OPC in say M40/M50 concrete. Such a PPC would produce a high-strength PPC concrete (= 60 MPa @ 28d) + improved workability, durability and sustainability.
Another interesting aspect could also be of using ultrafine fine flyash /ultrafine slags as additions in OPC/PPC/PSC for achieving lower clinker factor as well as to achieve improved later age strengths with or without a combo cement additive.
The initial adhesion property at sites of especially PPC/PSC/PCC based mortars can be improved through use of appropriate organic polymers addition during the manufacture of these cements. Such cements would have a better adhesion property for plastering/brick bonding etc., as it has much lower rebound loss of their mortars in such applications.
It is needless to mention here that with use of additives, we could also have cement with viscosity modifying cement additives, for self-compaction and self-leveling concrete performance.
Use of Phosphogypsum retards the setting time of cements, we can use additive different additive combos to overcome retardation and improve the 1 day strengths of the cements and concretes.
About the author:
Shreesh Khadilkar, Consultant & Advisor, Former Director Quality & Product Development, ACC, a seasoned consultant and advisor, brings over 37 years of experience in cement manufacturing, having held leadership roles in R&D and product development at ACC Ltd. With deep expertise in innovative cement concepts, he is dedicated to sharing his knowledge and improving the performance of cement plants globally.
Refractory demands in our kiln have changed
Digital supply chain visibility is critical
Redefining Efficiency with Digitalisation
Cement Additives for Improved Grinding Efficiency
Digital Pathways for Sustainable Manufacturing
Refractory demands in our kiln have changed
Digital supply chain visibility is critical
Redefining Efficiency with Digitalisation
Cement Additives for Improved Grinding Efficiency
Digital Pathways for Sustainable Manufacturing
Trending News
-
Concrete4 weeks agoAris Secures Rs 630 Million Concrete Supply Order
-
Concrete4 weeks agoNITI Aayog Unveils Decarbonisation Roadmaps
-
Concrete3 weeks agoJK Cement Commissions 3 MTPA Buxar Plant, Crosses 31 MTPA
-
Economy & Market3 weeks agoBudget 2026–27 infra thrust and CCUS outlay to lift cement sector outlook


