Connect with us

Concrete

For better safety parameters, a holistic approach is needed

Published

on

Shares

Anuj Kumar Mathur, Industry Expert and Consultant, and (retired) DGM – Safety, Health & Environment, Indian Oil Corporation, discusses the various mandatory measures to ensure safety within the manufacturing unit.

What are the key points of safety in a manufacturing plant?
Ensuring safety in a manufacturing plant is a systematic process that begins with the thorough identification of potential hazards. This involves regular assessments of the workplace, actively engaging employees in the recognition and reporting of potential risks. Subsequently, a comprehensive evaluation of associated risks is conducted, considering both severity and likelihood, utilising established risk assessment tools.
This is followed by prioritising the identified risks, involving categorisation based on severity and likelihood, with attention to legal and regulatory requirements. The development of a robust risk mitigation plan is then crucial, incorporating engineering controls, administrative measures and personal protective actions. Stakeholder collaboration, particularly with employees, is vital in both formulating and executing this plan.
Continuous monitoring is key to ensuring the ongoing effectiveness of the mitigation plan. Regular assessments of implemented controls, periodic risk reassessment and a commitment to continuous improvement based on feedback and emerging risks are integral components of this monitoring process. This systematic and proactive approach aims to establish a strong safety culture in the manufacturing plant, safeguarding employee well-being and contributing to the overall success of the operation.

Tell us about the safety gear that are essential while working with high heat, flammable substances, heights etc.?
When working in environments with high heat, flammable substances or heights, certain safety gear is essential to mitigate risks and ensure worker protection. For high heat environments, heat-resistant clothing such as fire-resistant coveralls, gloves and boots are crucial to protect against burns and heat-related injuries. Additionally, flame-resistant hoods and face shields provide further protection for the face and head.
When dealing with flammable substances, flame-resistant clothing made of materials like Nomex or Kevlar is indispensable to reduce the risk of ignition and burns. Safety goggles and chemical-resistant gloves are also essential to shield the eyes and hands from hazardous chemicals.
In situations involving heights, fall protection gear is paramount for worker safety. This includes harnesses, lanyards and anchor points to prevent falls and mitigate the impact in case of a fall. Safety helmets are vital for head protection from falling objects or impacts during work at heights.
Overall, the combination of heat-resistant clothing, flame-resistant gear, chemical-resistant gloves, safety goggles, fall protection equipment and safety helmets provides comprehensive protection for workers in environments with high heat, flammable substances and heights. Regular inspection, proper usage and adherence to safety protocols are equally important to ensure the effectiveness of the safety gear and safeguard workers’ well-being.

What are the major challenges in maintaining safety standards in any manufacturing unit?
Upholding safety standards in a manufacturing unit is a complex challenge, encompassing various facets. Human behaviour is a significant hurdle, where despite thorough safety training, factors like complacency or shortcuts can introduce risks. Shifting or reinforcing behaviours to prioritise safety demands continual focus on education, communication and cultivating a safety-conscious culture.
The monotony of work adds another layer to this challenge, as routine tasks may diminish vigilance towards safety protocols. Combating this involves introducing task variety, implementing job rotation and incorporating regular breaks to sustain employee engagement and attention to safety.
Moreover, the dynamic nature of manufacturing processes and the integration of new technologies present ongoing challenges in adapting and updating safety measures accordingly. Regular assessments are crucial to pinpoint potential hazards associated with evolving processes.
Effective communication emerges as a pivotal challenge, ensuring consistent understanding and transmission of safety information across all organisational levels. This spans communication on alterations in safety protocols, incident reporting procedures and the significance of adhering to safety guidelines.
In essence, maintaining safety standards in manufacturing demands a comprehensive strategy, addressing behavioural nuances, alleviating work monotony, adapting to technological shifts and establishing robust communication channels. Proactively confronting these challenges establishes a resilient safety culture, minimising the risk of accidents within the workplace.

As an auditor, what are your key checkpoints to declare a plant safe?
Firstly, I would meticulously review the Safety Policy to ensure its clarity, alignment with industry standards, and dissemination throughout the organisation. Regulatory compliances form a critical aspect, necessitating a thorough examination to confirm adherence to local, national, and international safety regulations.
I would assess safety indicators, such as incident rates and near-miss reporting, to gauge the effectiveness of the plant’s safety performance. The presence and functionality of safety interlocks in machinery and processes would be scrutinised to prevent accidents. Furthermore, the establishment of a robust preventive and predictive maintenance programme is crucial for identifying and addressing potential safety hazards before they escalate.
A key focus would be on evaluating the prevailing safety culture within the plant, emphasising the importance of employee engagement and commitment to safety. Additionally, the emergency plan, encompassing evacuation procedures, communication protocols and emergency response drills, would be thoroughly examined to ensure preparedness for unforeseen events. The culmination of these checkpoints would enable me to make an informed declaration regarding the safety status of the manufacturing plant during the audit.

What are the major challenges in maintaining plant safety?
One significant challenge is fostering a robust safety culture that ingrains safety as a core value among all employees. Overcoming behavioural aspects, such as complacency and the normalisation of risks, requires continuous efforts in education and communication. The monotony of daily tasks can contribute to lapses in attention, demanding innovative approaches to keep safety at the forefront. Adapting to technological advancements introduces challenges in updating safety protocols to align with evolving processes. Ensuring compliance with stringent regulatory standards is an ongoing challenge, requiring vigilant monitoring and adjustments to meet changing requirements. Effective communication channels must be established to consistently convey safety information across diverse organisational levels.
The dynamic nature of manufacturing processes necessitates continuous risk assessments and proactive mitigation strategies. Addressing these challenges requires a holistic approach, integrating behavioural interventions, technological adaptations and a commitment to regulatory compliance, thereby creating a workplace where safety is not just a protocol but a shared responsibility ingrained in the fabric of the organisation.

What suggestions would you give cement plants to improve safety parameters?
For better safety parameters, a holistic approach is needed. Firstly, establishing comprehensive training programmes is crucial, ensuring that maintenance personnel are well-versed in the specific safety challenges inherent to cement plant operations. Regular safety audits should be conducted to identify and mitigate potential hazards, emphasising compliance with safety standards. Adequate provision and consistent use of personal protective equipment (PPE) must be prioritised, encompassing gear such as hard hats, gloves, eye protection and respiratory equipment.
Rigorous adherence to machine guarding and lockout/tagout procedures is imperative to prevent accidents during maintenance activities. Fall protection measures, especially for tasks performed at heights, need to be implemented. Proper chemical handling protocols, preventive maintenance programmes, and well-rehearsed emergency response plans contribute to a comprehensive safety framework. Employee involvement should be encouraged, fostering a culture of shared responsibility. Continuous training and effective communication channels ensure that safety practices remain current. Finally, the implementation of behaviour-based safety programmes enhances overall safety consciousness. By integrating these suggestions, cement plants can proactively mitigate risks, creating a safer working environment for their maintenance personnel.

  • Kanika Mathur

Concrete

Nuvoco Vistas Reports Record Q2 EBITDA, Expands Capacity to 35 MTPA

Cement Major Nuvoco Posts Rs 3.71 bn EBITDA in Q2 FY26

Published

on

By

Shares



Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd., one of India’s leading building materials companies, has reported its highest-ever second-quarter consolidated EBITDA of Rs 3.71 billion for Q2 FY26, reflecting an 8% year-on-year revenue growth to Rs 24.58 billion. Cement sales volume stood at 4.3 MMT during the quarter, driven by robust demand and a rising share of premium products, which reached an all-time high of 44%.

The company continued its deleveraging journey, reducing like-to-like net debt by Rs 10.09 billion year-on-year to Rs 34.92 billion. Commenting on the performance, Jayakumar Krishnaswamy, Managing Director, said, “Despite macro headwinds, disciplined execution and focus on premiumisation helped us achieve record performance. We remain confident in our structural growth trajectory.”

Nuvoco’s capacity expansion plans remain on track, with refurbishment of the Vadraj Cement facility progressing towards operationalisation by Q3 FY27. In addition, the company’s 4 MTPA phased expansion in eastern India, expected between December 2025 and March 2027, will raise its total cement capacity to 35 MTPA by FY27.

Reinforcing its sustainability credentials, Nuvoco continues to lead the sector with one of the lowest carbon emission intensities at 453.8 kg CO? per tonne of cementitious material.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Jindal Stainless to Invest $150 Mn in Odisha Metal Recovery Plant

New Jajpur facility to double metal recovery capacity and cut emissions

Published

on

By

Shares



Jindal Stainless Limited has announced an investment of $150 million to build and operate a new wet milling plant in Jajpur, Odisha, aimed at doubling its capacity to recover metal from industrial waste. The project is being developed in partnership with Harsco Environmental under a 15-year agreement.

The facility will enable the recovery of valuable metals from slag and other waste materials, significantly improving resource efficiency and reducing environmental impact. The initiative aligns with Jindal Stainless’s sustainability roadmap, which focuses on circular economy practices and low-carbon operations.

In financial year 2025, the company reduced its carbon footprint by about 14 per cent through key decarbonisation initiatives, including commissioning India’s first green hydrogen plant for stainless steel production and setting up the country’s largest captive solar energy plant within a single industrial campus in Odisha.

Shares of Jindal Stainless rose 1.8 per cent to Rs 789.4 per share following the announcement, extending a 5 per cent gain over the past month.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Vedanta gets CCI Approval for Rs 17,000 MnJaiprakash buyout

Acquisition marks Vedanta’s expansion into cement, real estate, and infra

Published

on

By

Shares



Vedanta Limited has received approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to acquire Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) for approximately Rs 17,000 million under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) process. The move marks Vedanta’s strategic expansion beyond its core mining and metals portfolio into cement, real estate, and infrastructure sectors.

Once the flagship of the Jaypee Group, JAL has faced severe financial distress with creditors’ claims exceeding Rs 59,000 million. Vedanta emerged as the preferred bidder in a competitive auction, outbidding the Adani Group with an overall offer of Rs 17,000 million, equivalent to Rs 12,505 million in net present value terms. The payment structure involves an upfront settlement of around Rs 3,800 million, followed by annual instalments of Rs 2,500–3,000 million over five years.

The National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (NARCL), which acquired the group’s stressed loans from a State Bank of India-led consortium, now leads the creditor committee. Lenders are expected to take a haircut of around 71 per cent based on Vedanta’s offer. Despite approvals for other bidders, Vedanta’s proposal stood out as the most viable resolution plan, paving the way for the company’s diversification into new business verticals.

Continue Reading

Trending News