Concrete
Driving Sustainability Through Technology
Published
3 years agoon
By
admin
The 14th Cement Expo and 9th Indian Cement Review Conference 2023, held at the Manekshaw Centre, New Delhi, marked a significant milestone in the Indian cement industry’s pursuit of sustainability through technological innovation. With a theme centred on ‘Driving Sustainability Through Technology,’ the conference hosted thought-provoking discussions, panel sessions, and presentations, showcasing the industry’s commitment to embracing cutting-edge solutions. Here’s a special report.
In a landmark event at the prestigious Manekshaw Centre, New Delhi, the 14th Cement Expo and 7th Indian Cement Review Conference 2023 unfolded a two-day symphony of innovation and collaboration. Inaugurated by Dr Vibha Dhawan, Director General, The Energy and Resource Institute (TERI), and Ali Emir Adiguzel, Founder and Director, World Cement Association, and Pratap Padode, Founder, FIRST Construction Council (FCC), the conference aimed to propel the Indian cement industry into a sustainable future marked by technological advancements.
The 7th Indian Cement Review Conference 2023 served as a hub of ideas and discussions on technological innovations essential for the industry’s sustainability journey, focusing on the theme ‘Driving Sustainability Through Technology.’ In his welcome address, Padode said, “All the big players of the Indian cement industry are focussing on increasing their capacity, with an estimated projection of 200 million tonnes of fresh capacity to be added in the coming years. Emphasis is also laid on being the lowest-cost cement producer in India. In fiscal 2023, 30-32 MT (inclusive of grinding and integrated units) capacity addition is reportedly expected. Given that the higher input costs have moderated we could see capacity addition picking up pace in fiscal 2024 at over 30-32 MT leading up to the addition of 150 MT by fiscal 2027. Considering this speed of expansion, the tug of competition and a buoyant demand from infrastructure and housing segments, the Indian cement sector is poised to take a giant leap.”
Luminaries such as Dr Vibha Dhawan and Ali Emir Adiguzel expressed their confidence in the Indian cement industry’s commitment to ‘Driving Sustainability Through Technology.’
The event garnered support from esteemed entities like the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government e-Marketplace (GeM), and the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India (GoI).
Dr Dhawan addressed the issue of climate change: “Nearly two-third of infrastructure development in India is still pending. Cement and steel are materials that are required in bulk to support this kind of development. This gives an insight into a higher demand, leading to the need of higher production, which is an opportunity for cement manufacturers to grow their business and develop the nation.”
She added, “The unfortunate part of climate change is that it was established that a 1.5oC increase in temperature is acceptable as per norms, but that is slowly shifting to 2.5oC. Temperature above 52oC will not support human life. It will also impact biodiversity and climate change will bring along with itself a plethora of diseases known and unknown. The impact will not be uniform across the globe. Countries like ours will be impacted more as we are already affected by climate change.”
In his speech, Adiguzel said, “The power of Indian Cement industry goes beyond its sheer size. It is a catalyst for economic growth driving employment, investment and innovation, creating job opportunities directly or indirectly. The question is – are global Net Zero policies colliding with economic growth in India? Navigating the interplay between Net Zero policies, economic policies and emission targets in the cement industry is a global conversation.”
“India is a growing, emerging country witnessing a dramatic increase in cement demand that will continue for a foreseeable future. India will make the high production capacity increase in the world in the next 24 months with more than 100 million tonnes in capacity will be executed. However, it is a fact that cement production accounts for 7 per cent for global carbon emissions and we must be honest that there is no feasible technology to avoid carbon emission yet.
The path to sustainability demands innovation, collaboration and collective acknowledgement of the hurdles that lie ahead. Indian cement industry has been at the forefront of adapting sustainable practices,” he added.
Jaxay Shah, Chairperson, Quality Council of India, emphasised the dynamic nature of the cement industry at the event through a video message. He acknowledged the significance of the Cement Expo, highlighting its role as a testament to the industry’s adaptability. Shah stressed the importance of integrating ideas, best practices, and technology to shape the future of cement and construction.
Dr LP Singh, Director General, National Council for Cement and Building Material (NCB), emphasised the holistic definition of sustainability in cement and concrete, with the organisation working on every aspect to ensure future development while protecting the environment.
He explained, “If one searches for Climate Action Tracker and looks for India, the overall rating is highly insufficient. Our actions and policies are still not sufficient to achieve our targets. This tracker is essential to understand where India stands on a global scale in achieve its carbon reduction and sustainability goals. NCCBM is so closely associated with the Indian cement industry and we have observed that this industry is one of the best in the world for decarbonisation. Indian cement industry through research, AFR and technology is steadily moving towards its goals of achieving Net Zero by 2070 and this is a continuous effort and we need to aggressively work towards it.”
Kaustubh Phadke, India Head, Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), lauded the Indian cement sector as the most energy-efficient globally, reducing over 40 per cent of CO2 intensity at the national level. The industry aims to deliver Net Zero concrete by 2050, aligning with global sustainability goals.
“With respect to India, GCCA is working with TERI and CMA on developing an India specific roadmap to Net Zero for Indian Cement and Concrete sector highlighting the path towards Net Zero 2050 and scenario 2070. This roadmap will showcase various technological inputs and policy ask required by the sector form the government. It is a collaborative effort and support in terms of technology, policy and finance will be required to achieve our goals,” he elaborated.
Presenting Green Solutions
Global consultant Ulhas Parlikar presented a technical paper on ‘Circular Economy Practices in Cement Production’ emphasising the significance of embracing circular economy principles for a sustainable cement industry.
Dr SB Hegde, Prof Jain University & Visiting Professor Pennsylvania State University, USA, presented a paper on ‘Alternative Raw Materials and Supplementary Cementitious Materials’, in which he explained how waste from other industries can be repurposed as raw materials for the cement sector.
Dr Singh’s presentation was centred on the topic of ‘Role of CCUS in Decarbonising the Indian Cement Industry,’ wherein he focussed on the challenges faced and probably solutions for capturing, storing and utilising carbon.
Presentations were also made by partner companies such as Flender, Gebr. Pfeiffer, Loesche India, ATS Conveyors, TAIHEIYO Engineering Corporation, KHD Humboldt and ISGEC.
Engaging Panel Discussions
Driving sustainability: Challenges and opportunities in cement industry
The panel discussion explored collaboration, innovation and knowledge-sharing as essential drivers for a more sustainable future. Different aspects such as challenges and opportunities and emphasising the need for collective efforts were discussed.
Rustagi opined, “OPC is opted for as default. We don’t exercise our option of selecting the best suitable and best quality cement for a particular application. On the demand side, it’s important to give the value proposition for blended cement. We need to accelerate the pace at which the shift to blended cement is happening.”
“We have to emphasise on the reprocessing of RDF as currently we are getting raw MSW, which we shred and put in the kiln. In one of our plants, we have gone up to 30 per cent with substitution but beyond that it is difficult to sustain the kiln. When we separated inert and RDF fraction, we found 48 per cent ash content in that RDF. So, when you say you are feeding 20 tonnes of material to the kiln, 6-7 tonnes is ash and 5-6 tonnes is water. This is what deteriorates your combustion efficiency,” said Sameer Bharadwaj, Head Manufacturing Excellence, JK Cement.
“As a technology supplier, when we supply an equipment, we inform the customer on what is the CO2 emission level and the secondary way of doing energy savings. It is important to focus on secondary methods of energy efficiency such as renewable energy, electric vehicles and solar panels. Government needs to make the rules more stringent and only then can we meet our Net Zero target by 2070,” added Naveenthakrishna.
Elaborating on the above discussed points, Maheshwari added, “Net Zero targets cannot be achieved without the contribution of cement, steel and petrochemical industries. The Indian cement industry has reduced its carbon emissions by 40 per cent in the last two decades, and there’s a target to reduce 20 per cent more in the next 5-10 years. Additional factors that are helping reduce CO2 emissions are energy efficiency, shift from wet to dry kilns, use biomass as alternative fuel, green hydrogen etc.”
Alternative Materials and Technologies
This panel delved into exploring alternative materials and technologies for sustainable cement manufacturing. The discussion highlighted the importance of innovation in materials and processes to enhance sustainability.
Dr Mohapatra set the tone of the discussion with his observation: “During my tenure with NCCBM, 70 materials were inventorised from industrial waste, which can be successfully utilised in the cement industry as part replacement for the raw materials. Materials such as red mud which were refused 15 years ago are not only accepted today but have become a requirement now. Among industrial waste, certain materials are used as alternative fuel and others are used as raw materials, additives and supplementary materials. Although the cement industry is producing CO2, it is helping other industries by assimilating their wastes.”
“India is likely to reach 1500 mtpa in cement production. With the push from Swachha Bharat Abhiyaan in 2014, some plants have hit 30-40 per cent of thermal substitution rate (TSR). But that’s not the national average, which is still below 10 per cent. India will reach 25 per cent TSR by 2030. This is a quantum jump that we are looking at
and the industry has taken this responsibility very seriously. However, the aspiration is to have 50 per cent TSR by 2050. We can bring down the CO2 emissions from fuels by almost 60 per cent,” said Rao.
Pahuja added, “As far as low carbon cement is concerned, the Indian cement industry is already producing composite cement with clinker content of 45-50 per cent, and slag cement with clinker content of 35-40 per cent. Availability of slag is, however, a limitation. Development of LC3 is already underway, wherein utilisation of calcine clay and combination of limestone, with clinker factor coming down to as low as 40 per cent. Currently, the BIS has limited the clinker factor at 50 per cent. In a year or so, we will see low clinker, low carbon cement being produced in plants across the country.”
“As far as ultra fine grinding is concerned, yes, it is possible. We have a reference plant where we are able to grind fly ash, 100 per cent. We are also able to do the same with slag. We have a technology for LC3, too, which includes both flash calciner and kiln solution. Our degasifiers control the temperature within the circuits and also take care of the ash that’s generated due to alternative fuels. With so much construction work going on, there is demolition also that’s happening, which leads to concrete waste. This concrete waste can be recycled in our mills to separate cementitious materials, which can be sent back to cement plants or ready-mix concrete plants,” elaborated Khanna.
Revolutionising Cement Manufacturing: Technology and Automation
This panel revolved around the many tools of automation deployed by cement companies to make the manufacturing process more efficient and sustainable.
In his opening address, Ghawri pointed out: “The Indian cement industry is increasingly adopting Industry 4.0 technologies, through automation, AI and data analytics, to improve efficiency, reduce costs and enhance the product quality. It is important to maintain accuracy through process control and automation technology. Automation is also used to control the entire production flow, from raw material processing to finished product packaging.”
“We need to have a real-time tracking system to help convert inefficiencies into efficiencies. In order to control costs, we need a mechanism that can monitor the KPIs properly. We also need to figure out how to monitor and reduce the logistics costs by 35-40 per cent with the help of automation,” suggested Mohanty.
Jain said, “First and foremost, we are considering process automation to optimise the efficiency of the equipment, reduce downtime and improve reliability. And secondly, we would like to consider predictive maintenance instead of breakdown maintenance in order to manage the production process more efficiently.”
“Reliability is an issue that is not properly addressed in the industry and that needs to be rectified. Optimisation of the process and the interlinked aspects of production and finished product should also be looked at. While looking at the input process, it is important to have the right raw mix, which can be done with AI and ML. Similarly, energy efficiency during the clinkerisation process and the output quality can be improved with AI and ML,” added Aiyer.
Henrich opined, “It is important to focus on less downtime and optimisation of processes. Augmented reality (AR) can be used for the purpose of training and re-training. Every supplier installs equipment with a heavy instruction manual but the worker always starts with low level of information. AR can help in that. Also, camera systems, together with AI and ML, can be used to determine raw material and product quality.”
“We should leverage Internet of Things (IoT) as a technology. You can use it for three basic things – enhancing your supply chain, improving your quality and ensuring safety. Technologies like Digital Twin can help you replicate the process and simulate the equipment, allowing you to monitor and improve the process without having a downtime,” said Mathur.
Chordia observed, “There needs to a system akin to an auto pilot in the control room. With a tool such as our Ability Expert Optimizer, the controller is at a liberty to focus on data analytics. If human productivity is improved with such a system, it indirectly helps improve plant productivity, too. With advanced solutions, the use of alternative fuels should be increased in order to reduce carbon emissions.”
Future Trends and Innovations in Cement Industry: A Sustainability Outlook
This panel was devoted to crystal-ball gazing of innovations in the pipeline, and the areas of cement manufacturing that need sustainable solutions.
Kejriwal highlighted, “As we all are aware, there are two major issues that the cement industry is facing – one is the process-based emissions and the other is emissions from allied activities such as electricity consumption, logistics, etc. In terms of upcoming technologies, we are looking at carbon capture technology, which still has a long way to go. More innovations will be required to fully capture the CO2 that’s being emitted. We are already working on alternative raw materials but we need more work on electricity consumption. A combination of two or three such technological development will lead to reduction in CO2 emissions.”
Narwekar underscored certain key elements. He said, “There are 3-4 themes that stand out in future technology. One is carbon capture, utilisation and storage, wherein intent is there but a lot of investment is required. In a hard-to-abate industry like cement, capturing CO2 and what we do with it, is critical. Other themes that are coming up are alternative clinker production, clinker-fee binders, novel kiln technology, low carbon products, carbonation of concrete and geopolymer cement.”
“Speaking from the logistics point of view, since cement industry involves logistics movement of raw material and finished products, and that’s where carbon emissions matter. About 75 per cent of the current cement output is moved along the roadways. The rail coefficient is only 25 per cent. So, if you have to reduce CO2 emission for transportation of cement, you have to increase the rail coefficient to at least 50 per cent. Same is applicable for movement of raw materials,” said Garg.
Gupta spoke at length about the immediate challenges that the Indian cement industry needs to tackle with the help of technology. He said, “Carbon capture and storage is crucial but the technology is not fully developed and it also requires huge investment. So, we require support of technology suppliers as well as the government’s support. This is because capturing carbon, utilising it and storing it are three different aspects. There is still no clarity on how carbon can be utilised and by which industries. Carbon storage requires a huge infrastructure. CCUS is important as without it we cannot achieve Net Zero target by 2050. Another important factor is green energy. Holistically speaking, 20-25 per cent of energy used by the cement sector is sourced from non-fossil fuels. We clearly have a long way to go. We need to look at WHRS, solar energy, wind power, hydel power, composite power, etc. For instance, to use solar energy, we need batteries that require a huge investment. This is where we need government’s support or we need to find a technology supplier who can install a battery bank at lower cost. Apart from CCUS and green energy, circular economy is also a major part of this roadmap. In the Indian cement industry, TSR is 6-7 per cent only, and this is related to the volumes. Technology is available and we have to utilise it to scale up to 40 per cent and then to 80 per cent. We have to invest in R&D as it is an important factor in reducing carbon emissions.”
Conclusion
The 9th Indian Cement Review Conference set the stage for a transformative journey, steering the Indian cement industry from challenges to opportunities through technological advancements. As the industry focuses on sustainability, innovation, and global collaboration, the conference stands as a testament to the sector’s commitment to driving positive change and achieving net-zero targets.
Concrete
CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech
To build capacity of 100,000 tonnes a year
Published
3 days agoon
August 28, 2026By
admin
CarbonStrong has raised Rs 125 million (125 mn) to scale a low carbon cement technology and build commercial production capacity. The startup was founded in 2022 by Harsh Jain and Vikramaditya Singh and has moved from customer trials to plans for industrial supply. The company said its material replaces up to 50 per cent of cement in concrete while reducing costs and improving durability.
CarbonStrong states the product is around 30 per cent cheaper than cement and compatible with existing concrete plants, reducing the need for new equipment and operational disruption. Trials and paid pilots have been conducted in Bengaluru, Hyderabad and Chennai with demonstration projects involving ready-mix firms and precast manufacturers. Compatibility with current workflows forms a central part of the commercial strategy, aiming to ease adoption by builders and contractors.
The funding will support construction of a facility with capacity of up to 100,000 tonnes (100,000 t) a year over the next two years to supply early customers commercially. The firm is also developing materials from steel slag, copper slag and mine tailings to expand its feedstock base, while noting the technical challenge of homogenising different waste streams. Recognition by HCL ClimaForce in 2026 and by the Avaana-Startup India-NITI Aayog AIM Grand Challenge in 2025 has underscored progress.
Industry adoption remains the principal test and will require consistent material performance, supply reliability and competitive economics. CarbonStrong projects the Indian market for cement substitutes could reach Rs 250 billion (250 bn) by 2030 and has set an ambition to produce 10 million tonnes a year by 2035 (10 mn t), a target far above its near term capacity. Moving from pilots to production demands capital, manufacturing discipline and customers willing to specify the material beyond demonstrations. The recent Rs 125 million raise is intended to fund the next phase of scale and to demonstrate that industrial waste can become a dependable input for lower carbon construction.
In a research-backed article, Dr SB Hegde examines why carbon-adjusted profitability and LC3 will decide the next set of winners in cement manufacturing.
The Indian cement industry has achieved world-class operational efficiency through lower specific energy consumption, high plant utilisation and a reduced average clinker factor of approximately 67.5 per cent. These traditional measures of operational excellence remain essential. However, they are no longer sufficient. Carbon now carries a measurable financial cost under India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) and under European carbon markets. Future leadership will be defined by carbon-adjusted profitability, the ability to generate strong returns while systematically lowering the carbon intensity of every ton sold.
Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) offers a practical, scalable pathway to achieve this dual objective. By replacing up to 50 per cent of clinker with calcined clay and limestone, LC3 can reduce CO2 emissions by 30–40 per cent while delivering comparable or superior durability performance.
This article examines the technical foundations of LC3, European industrial practices, the emerging Indian carbon market and a concrete roadmap for Indian companies to embed carbon-adjusted metrics and LC3 into daily operations, incentives and commercial strategy.
Limits of traditional operational excellence
For many years, plant performance has been judged primarily by five indicators: specific heat consumption, specific power consumption, kiln and mill utilisation, clinker factor and overall equipment effectiveness. These metrics drove continuous improvement and helped the industry reduce energy use and increase the share of blended cement. Three structural changes have rendered them incomplete as sole measures of success.
First, carbon now carries a real or opportunity cost. Plants that improve volume or lower cash cost while raising or stagnating emissions intensity create a hidden liability that will surface as CCTS trading matures and as green procurement expands.
Second, lower-carbon products such as LC3 and high-performance blended cements are creating differentiated market segments. Customers in infrastructure, real estate and export-oriented construction are beginning to specify embodied-carbon limits.
Third, investors and lenders increasingly treat carbon intensity as a financial risk factor. Traditional KPIs can mask the divergence between short-term cash profit and long-term carbon-adjusted value.
What is carbon-adjusted profitability?
Carbon-adjusted profitability evaluates normal profit after explicit adjustment for carbon performance. A practical expression is:
Carbon-Adjusted EBITDA = Conventional EBITDA – Carbon Cost + Green Premium Income
Carbon cost may be an internal carbon price, the actual cost of purchasing Carbon Credit Certificates under CCTS, or the opportunity cost of high emissions relative to peers. Green premium income arises when customers pay more for verified lower-carbon cement or when the company sells surplus credits. Tracking both conventional and carbon-adjusted profit side-by-side gives management a clearer picture of value creation under evolving market rules.
Table 1. Traditional KPIs versus Carbon-Adjusted Leadership Metrics
Traditional Focus New Leadership Metric Why It Matters
Specific energy consumption Emissions intensity (kg CO2/t cement) Directly linked to future CCTS and CBAM costs
Kiln utilisation Carbon-adjusted contribution margin Reveals true value of incremental volume
Clinker factor Share of lower-carbon products sold (incl. LC3) Measures commercial success of the transition
Power cost per tonne Effective carbon cost per tonne sold Expose hidden liabilities
Absolute EBITDA Carbon-adjusted EBITDA + green premium Aligning profit with future market reality
LC3: Technical foundations and performance advantages
LC3 is a ternary blended cement that typically combines approximately 50 per cent clinker, 30 per cent calcined clay, 15 per cent limestone and 5 per cent gypsum (the classic LC3-50 formulation). The decisive technical advantage is that clay is calcined at 700–850 °C, far below the 1,450 °C required for clinker production. This lower temperature, together with the substantial reduction in clinker content, delivers CO2 reductions of 30–40 per cent relative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC).
Chemistry is synergistic. Calcined kaolinitic clay (metakaolin) reacts with calcium hydroxide from clinker hydration and with limestone to form additional C-A-S-H gel and carboaluminate phases. These phases densify the microstructure, reduce porosity and improve durability.
Field experience shows superior resistance to chloride ingress, sulphate attack and alkali–silica reaction. Early-age strength can match OPC with high-reactivity clays; later-age strengths routinely meet 42.5 and 52.5 grade requirements.
Importantly, LC3 does not require high-purity kaolin. Clays with 40 per cent or even lower kaolinite content can be activated successfully, expanding raw-material availability across India. Calcination can use adapted rotary kilns or dedicated flash calciners, making the technology compatible with existing plant infrastructure and far less capital-intensive than carbon capture.
Economic analyses show that LC3 can be produced at equal or lower cost than OPC in many locations because of reduced energy demand and cheaper clay. Life-cycle assessments consistently report 30–40 per cent lower embodied CO2 per tonne of cement.
Table 2. Comparative profile: OPC versus LC3-50
Parameter OPC LC3-50
Typical clinker content ~95 per cent ~50 per cent
CO2 emissions (relative) Baseline (≈0.85 t CO2/t cement process + fuel) 30–40 per cent lower
Clay calcination temperature Not applicable 700–850 °C
Key hydration products C-S-H, portlandite, ettringite C-A-S-H + carboaluminates
Chloride & sulphate resistance Good Superior
Production cost potential Baseline Equal or lower in most locations
Infrastructure compatibility Existing High (minor adaptations)
In India, commercial adoption has begun in earnest. JK Cement commenced the first commercial production of LC3 in the Indian subcontinent at its Mangrol plant in Rajasthan in 2025 under BIS standard IS 18189.
By early 2026, approximately 2,000 tonnes had been produced and sold, avoiding an estimated 500 tonnes of CO2. JK Lakshmi Cement followed with commercial launch of its Green PRO LC3 grade from the Jaykaypuram plant. As of mid-2026, two producers are supplying LC3 to the market. The first large-scale infrastructure application is the Noida International Airport (Jewar), where LC3 was used in the runway and a building complex, demonstrating full constructability and performance under demanding conditions. These early volumes are still small relative to national cement demand, but they mark the critical transition from pilot to commercial reality. Companies that scale capacity now will be positioned to capture both CCTS credits and emerging green-procurement demand.
Why the shift is accelerating
According to the World Bank’s State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026, direct carbon pricing now covers nearly 30 per cent of global greenhouse-gas emissions and generated more than US$107 billion in public revenue in 2025. The average global carbon price stands at approximately US$21 per tonne, although regional prices vary widely.
In Europe, the EU ETS price has traded near €80–85 per tonen in mid-2026. Free allocation for cement is being withdrawn in parallel with CBAM. European producers therefore face a clear signal: every tonne of avoided CO2 improves both compliance and competitiveness. Holcim has scaled calcined-clay production, including Europe’s first dedicated line at Saint-Pierre-la-Cour (France) and a second line in the Czech Republic (2026). Heidelberg Materials, Cementir (FUTURECEM) and others have commercialised low-clinker calcined-clay blends across multiple markets, showing that carbon-adjusted profitability is already reshaping capital allocation in the world’s most mature carbon market.India’s CCTS is now operational. Binding emission intensity targets apply to 186 cement facilities for FY 2025–26 and FY 2026–27. Average required reductions for integrated plants are modest (around 2.7 per cent by FY 2027), yet the direction is clear.
Trading of Carbon Credit Certificates is expected in the second half of 2026, with early prices likely in the `800–1,500 per tonne range. Plants that outperform targets can sell credits; those that underperform must buy them or face compensation. Cement is well positioned to be a net supplier of credits if clinker factor continues to fall through LC3 and other low-clinker systems.
Way forward for India
India starts from a strong baseline, world-class energy efficiency and a clinker factor already lower than the global average. The next competitive frontier is the deliberate reduction of process emissions through clinker substitution at scale. LC3 is uniquely suited to Indian conditions because suitable clays are widely distributed, the technology fits existing kiln and grinding infrastructure, and the resulting product can meet the performance demands of both infrastructure and building construction.
A practical national pathway contains five interlocking elements:
- Standards and acceptance: Accelerated finalisation and promotion of BIS specifications for calcined-clay and limestone–calcined-clay cements will remove a key barrier to commercial uptake. Alignment with European practice (EN 197-5) can facilitate knowledge transfer and export readiness.
- Supply-chain development: Investment in flash calcination capacity and systematic characterisation of regional clay deposits will secure reliable, low-cost feedstock. Existing rotary kilns can be adapted for initial volumes while dedicated calciners are built.
- Incentive alignment: Part of variable compensation for plant managers, sales teams and senior leadership should be linked to emissions intensity reduction and to the volume of lower-carbon products (including LC3) sold. Without this link, traditional volume and cost targets will continue to dominate behaviour.
- Product-level carbon accounting: Reliable measurement of emissions intensity at the individual cement grade level, supported by third-party verification where required, is essential for both CCTS compliance and credible green claims.
- Demand-side pull: Green public procurement policies that specify maximum embodied-carbon thresholds for major infrastructure projects will create a predictable market for LC3 and other low-carbon cements, accelerating scale and cost reduction.
Companies that treat LC3 as a strategic product line rather than a niche offering will be better positioned to generate surplus Carbon Credit Certificates, capture any emerging green premium, and protect margins as carbon costs rise.
Organisational changes required
Technical capability alone is insufficient. Three organisational shifts are required.
Daily management: Emissions intensity must appear on the same daily and monthly dashboards as heat consumption, power consumption and utilization. Plant reviews should examine both conventional and carbon-adjusted results.
Incentives: A meaningful portion of bonuses for plant heads, technical teams and sales leadership should be tied to lower emissions intensity and successful commercialisation of LC3 and other low-carbon grades.
Commercial approach: Sales teams need clear volume and pricing targets for lower-carbon products, supported by technical service that helps customers specify and place the material correctly. Without commercial pull, excellent technical performance remains under-utilised.
Table 3. Three-stage roadmap to carbon-adjusted profitability
Time Horizon Priority Actions Expected Outcome
Next 12 months Add emissions intensity to plant dashboards; establish internal carbon price; initiate LC3 pilot production and customer trials Visibility and early organisational learning
12–24 months Revise incentive systems; scale LC3 and other low-carbon grades to key accounts; secure third-party verification capability People and sales aligned with carbon goals
24–36 months Embed carbon-adjusted metrics in board reporting and capital allocation; expand calcined-clay capacity Full system integration and competitive advantage
Questions senior leaders should ask
Boards can accelerate the transition by insisting on answers to a short list of questions:
• Is our carbon-adjusted profit improving, stable or declining relative to conventional EBITDA?
• Did recent volume growth improve or worsen our emissions intensity?
• What share of sales already comes from lower-carbon products, including LC3, and what is the trajectory?
• How exposed is our capital expenditure plan to rising carbon costs under CCTS and potential CBAM-related requirements?
• Do our incentive systems still reward only volume and cost, or have they been updated to include carbon performance?
Treating carbon with the same seriousness as energy cost or kiln utilization does not diminish operational excellence; it expands the definition of excellence to match the new competitive reality.
Looking ahead
By 2030 the gap between leading and lagging cement companies will not be decided by who records the lowest specific heat consumption. It will be decided by who delivers the strongest carbon-adjusted profits.
Absolute emissions may still rise as national production grows. That is not the issue. Companies that reduce intensity year after year and successfully sell cleaner products will pull ahead in both domestic and export markets. Those that do not will fall behind, even if their traditional efficiency numbers look strong.
Operational excellence built the Indian cement industry. It remains the foundation. It is no longer the complete picture. Carbon-adjusted profitability is the clearer measure of success.
LC3 is not a distant technology. It is available now. It cuts CO3 by 30–40 per cent, works with existing plants, and is already in commercial production in India. Companies that treat it as a strategic product, not a pilot, will protect their margins and generate tradable credits.
Leaders who act now will place carbon metrics on daily dashboards, link incentives to intensity reduction and LC3 sales, invest in calcined-clay capacity, and build commercial capability to sell lower-carbon products. They will shape the next chapter of the industry.
References
- World Bank. (2026). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2026. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
- International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). (2026). India Carbon Credit Trading Scheme – Status and Coverage. Berlin: ICAP.
- Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change / Bureau of Energy Efficiency. (2025). Greenhouse Gases Emission Intensity Target Rules, 2025. New Delhi: Government of India.
- Scrivener, K., Martirena, F., Bishnoi, S., & Maity, S. (2018). Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 49–56.
- RMI. (2024). The Business Case for LC3. Rocky Mountain Institute.
- European Commission. (2026). EU Emissions Trading System – Allowance Price Data and Free Allocation Phase-out Schedule. Brussels.
- Holcim. (2025–2026). Scaling Calcined Clay for Sustainable Building – Corporate Updates on European and Latin American Capacity. Zurich: Holcim Ltd.
- LC3 Project / EPFL. (2026). LC3 – A Guide to Best Practices for Scalable, Affordable and Sustainable Low-Carbon Building. Lausanne: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
- Business Today / Industry Reports. (2026). First Large-Scale LC3 Application at Noida International Airport, Jewar. New Delhi.
- NITI Aayog / Industry Analyses. (2026). Roadmap and Baseline Performance Indicators for the Indian Cement Sector. New Delhi.
- Springer / Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. (2026). LC3 Systems: A Review of Chemistry, Performance, Durability and Sustainability toward Market Adoption.
- Cementir Holding / Industry Sources. (2025–2026). FUTURECEM and Related Low-Clinker Technologies in Europe.
- Climate Risk Horizons & Independent Analyses. (2026). Assessment of Emission Intensity Targets under India’s CCTS for Cement and Other Hard-to-Abate Sectors.
- GCCA / TERI. (Various years). Decarbonization Roadmaps for the Indian Cement Industry.
- EN 197-5:2021. Cement – Part 5: Portland-composite cement CEM II/C-M and Composite cement CEM VI. European Committee for Standardization.
Concrete
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
Published
3 days agoon
August 28, 2026By
admin
Dijam Panigrahi makes a counterintuitive but data-backed argument that routing every sensor alert through human approval does not make cement plants safer.
India’s cement industry has spent the last two years wiring kilns, mills and coolers with sensors and automated control systems, and the safety case for doing so is strong on paper. Contract workers still make up the majority of the industry’s workforce, and fatal accidents remain a recurring problem. The Indian National Cement Workers Federation has noted that around 83 per cent of workers in the sector hold precarious positions, a fact that resurfaced after an oxygen cylinder explosion killed three contract workers at a plant in Chhattisgarh.
Industry tallies compiled by IndustriALL found cement plants recorded at least seventeen accidents in one year with 21 workers killed, and ten accidents the following year with nine killed, most of them contract staff. Automated monitoring, in theory, closes that gap. A sensor never gets complacent and never skips a check because a shift is short staffed.
However, plants that respond by routing every anomaly reading to a person for approval are quietly building a system that fails the same way understaffing does. When operators receive dozens of flagged deviations a shift, most of them minor, they learn a simple lesson: the fastest way through the queue is to approve without reading closely. The safety benefit disappears, not because the technology failed, but because the humans supervising it adapted to the volume.
Why alerts get ignored
A study cited by manufacturing technology publisher Applied SmartFactory found more than 95 per cent of alarms in a semiconductor fab were low priority, and only about 4 per cent ever triggered an action, with just 100 out of 5,000 alarms accounting for 70 per cent of all alarm activity. The mechanism is the same whether the trigger is a vibration sensor or an AI model flagging a kiln temperature swing. Once the ratio of noise to signal crosses a threshold, workers stop treating the system as a decision aid and start treating it as a formality to clear.
The scale of AI deployment underway makes this more than a theoretical risk. Stanford’s 2026 AI Index Report found organisational adoption of AI has reached 88 per cent, even as documented AI incidents rose to 362 in 2025, up sharply from 233 the year before, according to analysis of the report. The Index also found only about a third of organisations have adopted a formal governance framework, with NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework cited by 33 per cent and ISO/IEC 42001 cited by 36 per cent.
Most manufacturers are deploying monitoring systems faster than they are building the judgment for when a flagged event actually needs a person’s attention. In India, plants run by JK Cement have begun pairing CCTV feeds with AI to define safe zones around heavy machinery, a promising direction that still depends on operators trusting and reading the alerts the system generates.
A three-tier model for cement plant
The fix is not less monitoring or more monitoring. It is classifying decisions by risk and by novelty, rather than treating human oversight as a single switch that is either on or off. A workable model sorts factory floor events into three tiers.
The first tier, proceed, covers deviations the plant has seen before that fall within known safe bounds, such as a kiln feed rate adjustment within an established range. These should run without a stop for approval, because routing them to a person only trains that person to click through.
The second tier, pause, covers events that are unusual but not yet dangerous, such as a vibration reading trending toward a limit or a fuel blend shifting outside its typical mix. These warrant a brief human check before the system proceeds, giving an operator the chance to apply judgment the model does not yet have.
The third tier, escalate, covers events that are both high risk and unfamiliar, such as a pressure reading combined with a temperature spike that has no close precedent in the plant’s history. These should stop the process entirely and require a decision from someone with the authority to shut down a line.
Who should set the threshold
Where these tiers get drawn matters as much as the framework itself. Threshold setting is frequently handed to the vendor supplying the monitoring software or to a plant’s IT department, both of which understand the technology but not the specific tolerances of a given kiln, mill or line. Operations staff, who know that a particular grinding unit runs hotter under monsoon humidity or that a calciner behaves differently after a refractory reline, are better positioned to calibrate what counts as routine on their own equipment.
Handing threshold ownership to operations does not remove IT or vendors from the process, but it puts the calibration decision closest to the people who live with its consequences on the floor.
Signals that oversight is actually working
A few concrete indicators reveal whether a monitoring setup is functioning as intended or simply providing the appearance of safety. The escalation rate over time is the first: a rate that stays flat or climbs slowly as operations mature is healthy, while one that spikes and then falls sharply often means operators have started overriding the system rather than engaging with it. Time to resolution is the second: escalations that take progressively longer to close suggest fatigue or confusion about ownership, not diligence. The third, and most telling, is how accurate the system’s own uncertainty estimates turn out to be, meaning whether events flagged as high risk actually correlated with real incidents, and whether events waved through stayed incident free. A system whose escalations do not track with actual outcomes trains operators toward the same complacency that unmonitored equipment produces.
None of this argues against automation in Indian cement manufacturing, where a labor structure built on contract work and a track record of serious accidents make better monitoring an urgent need. It argues for treating human oversight as a design problem with three distinct settings, rather than a single
dial turned up whenever a plant wants to look safer on paper.
About the author:
Dijam Panigrahi, Co-founder and COO, GridRaster, is a spatial computing platform for industrial enterprises and manufacturers.
CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech
Protect Your Margins
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
The biggest gap arises from inconsistent leadership
The Future of Vertical Material Handling
CarbonStrong Raises Rs 125 Million To Scale Low Carbon Cement Tech
Protect Your Margins
More Oversight Makes Cement Plants Less Safe
The biggest gap arises from inconsistent leadership

