The Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) launched by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency incentivises energy efficiency and consumption, resulting in economic benefits in the long term.
The Indian cement industry is involved in production of several types of cement such as Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC), Portland Blast Furnace Slag Cement (PBFS), Oil Well Cement, Rapid Hardening Portland Cement, Sulphate Resisting Portland Cement, White Cement, etc. The Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) launched by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency under the Ministry of Power, Government of India, offers an opportunity to the industry to improve its energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption resulting in long term economic benefits in terms of reduced fuel expenditure with trading.
The key goal of the PAT scheme under NMEEE, is to mandate specific energy efficiency improvements for the most energy intensive industries, and further incentivise them to achieve better energy efficiency improvements that are superior to their specified SEC improvement targets. To facilitate this, the scheme provides the option to industries that achieve superior savings to be rewarded with energy saving certificates for the excess savings, and to trade the additional certified energy savings certificates with other designated consumers who can utilise these certificates to comply with their reduction targets. The Energy Saving Certificates (ESCerts) thus issued will be tradable on special trading platforms to be created in the power exchanges.
The Bureau of Energy Efficiency focused on development of normalisation factors so as to normalise the variation of operating parameters in the target year with respect to baseline operating parameters.
Let us look at the baseline energy consumption parameters taken for consideration before the normalisation thresholds were ascertained: It would be worthwhile to see how the industry has progressed against this baseline scenario for Thermal Energy Consumption and Electrical Energy Consumption as identified by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency.
The CII Energy Efficiency Audit conducted over several cement manufacturing units in 2018, provides us with the state of energy efficiency improvements achieved by the Indian industry stalwarts. While the names of the best individual performers have been kept undisclosed, we can at least see the top performing assets and the corresponding efficiencies they have achieved. The CII Report Energy Benchmarking (2019) has given the following data of the top best performing Cement Kilns in terms of Energy Consumption (CII Tables 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.3 – page 30).
The data shows improvement in the energy efficiency, both in the electrical as well as in the thermal area. But this shows the top ten performers doing better than the benchmark values set in 2007- 10. However, we do not know what the average data for the industry is. CII has taken up many energy efficiency improvement projects for implementation with the industry and many of them have been implemented. The gap identified for Electrical efficiency is as follows:
Waste Heat Recovery (WHR) systems on the other hand has given major savings in energy and remains the major focus area for adoption to reduce the electrical energy and related emission. The economics of putting up a captive power generating unit versus putting up a WHR system shows unique advantages for cost reduction. The capital investment for waste heat recovery systems is high at Rs 8 Cr /MW going by the current costs, whereas the CPP units can come at Rs 4.5 cr/MW; however, the project IRR would be very different as the cost of generation would be as low as Rs 0.40 per unit for the former while Rs 4.5 per unit for the latter, which given the current trajectory of fossil fuel prices is already under severe stress of upward correction. It is only the initial cost that continues to act as a deterrent for putting up a WHR unit.
The Indian cement industry must act responsibly and move quickly to put in investments that could raise the WHR installed capacity to cross the minimum threshold of 25 per cent of electricity consumption. That will still be far from the 20 billion KWhr of total electricity consumption by the industry.
The other area of concern is the price trajectory of fossil fuels, which would continue to move northwards. The WHR systems are one simplest way of insulating the industry from the vagaries of future price increases.
Thus, waste heat recovery systems could be the natural hedge to fossil fuel price increases for a substantial portion of the electrical consumption. As matters stand, most WHR systems would be the highest IRR projects that the industry as an ensemble can think of today.
Cement stocks surged over 5% on Monday, driven by Jefferies’ positive outlook on demand recovery, supported by increased government capital expenditure and favourable price trends.
JK Cement led the rally with a 5.3% jump, while UltraTech Cement rose 3.82%, making it the top performer on the Nifty 50. Dalmia Bharat and Grasim Industries gained over 3% each, with Shree Cement and Ambuja Cement adding 2.77% and 1.32%, respectively.
“Cement stocks have been consolidating without significant upward movement for over a year,” noted Vikas Jain, head of research at Reliance Securities. “The Jefferies report with positive price feedback prompted a revaluation of these stocks today.”
According to Jefferies, cement prices were stable in November, with earlier declines bottoming out. The industry is now targeting price hikes of Rs 10-15 per bag in December.
The brokerage highlighted moderate demand growth in October and November, with recovery expected to strengthen in the fourth quarter, supported by a revival in government infrastructure spending.
Analysts are optimistic about a stronger recovery in the latter half of FY25, driven by anticipated increases in government investments in infrastructure projects.
(ET)
The Ministry of Steel has proposed a 25% safeguard duty on certain steel imports to address concerns raised by domestic producers. The proposal emerged during a meeting between Union Steel Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy and Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal in New Delhi, attended by senior officials and executives from leading steel companies like SAIL, Tata Steel, JSW Steel, and AMNS India.
Following the meeting, Goyal highlighted on X the importance of steel and metallurgical coke industries in India’s development, emphasising discussions on boosting production, improving quality, and enhancing global competitiveness. Kumaraswamy echoed the sentiment, pledging collaboration between ministries to create a business-friendly environment for domestic steelmakers.
The safeguard duty proposal aims to counter the impact of rising low-cost steel imports, particularly from free trade agreement (FTA) nations. Steel Secretary Sandeep Poundrik noted that 62% of steel imports currently enter at zero duty under FTAs, with imports rising to 5.51 million tonnes (MT) during April-September 2024-25, compared to 3.66 MT in the same period last year. Imports from China surged significantly, reaching 1.85 MT, up from 1.02 MT a year ago.
Industry experts, including think tank GTRI, have raised concerns about FTAs, highlighting cases where foreign producers partner with Indian firms to re-import steel at concessional rates. GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava also pointed to challenges like port delays and regulatory hurdles, which strain over 10,000 steel user units in India.
The government’s proposal reflects its commitment to supporting the domestic steel industry while addressing trade imbalances and promoting a self-reliant manufacturing sector.
The Indian government has introduced anti-dumping duties on anodized aluminium frames for solar panels and modules imported from China, a move hailed by the Aluminium Association of India (AAI) as a significant step toward fostering a self-reliant aluminium sector.
The duties, effective for five years, aim to counter the influx of low-cost imports that have hindered domestic manufacturing. According to the Ministry of Finance, Chinese dumping has limited India’s ability to develop local production capabilities.
Ahead of Budget 2025, the aluminium industry has urged the government to introduce stronger trade protections. Key demands include raising import duties on primary and downstream aluminium products from 7.5% to 10% and imposing a uniform 7.5% duty on aluminium scrap to curb the influx of low-quality imports.
India’s heavy reliance on aluminium imports, which now account for 54% of the country’s demand, has resulted in an annual foreign exchange outflow of Rupees 562.91 billion. Scrap imports, doubling over the last decade, have surged to 1,825 KT in FY25, primarily sourced from China, the Middle East, the US, and the UK.
The AAI noted that while advanced economies like the US and China impose strict tariffs and restrictions to protect their aluminium industries, India has become the largest importer of aluminium scrap globally. This trend undermines local producers, who are urging robust measures to enhance the domestic aluminium ecosystem.
With India’s aluminium demand projected to reach 10 million tonnes by 2030, industry leaders emphasize the need for stronger policies to support local production and drive investments in capacity expansion. The anti-dumping duties on solar panel components, they say, are a vital first step in building a sustainable and competitive aluminium sector.