Connect with us

Technology

Technology for alternative fuel firing

Published

on

Shares

Use of low-grade alternative fuels such as waste coal, tyres, sewage sludge, and biomass fuels (such as wood products, agricultural waste, etc.) in pre-calciners is a feasible option since combustion in pre-calciner takes place at a lower temperature.

India is the second largest cement producer in the world and accounted for over 8 per cent of the global installed capacity as of 2019 with an overall cement production capacity of around 545 MT in FY20. The Indian cement industry is swiftly developing due to the increasing demand of construction sectors, be it housing, commercial, industrial, etc.

Cement manufacturing being a high energy consuming and heavy polluting process accounts for at least 8 per cent of the total emission of greenhouse gases. At the same time, energy-related expenses in the cement sector, mostly on fossil fuels and electricity, account for 30 to 40 per cent of the industry?? cash costs.

Historically, the primary fuel used in cement industry is coal. Recent increases of coal prices in the Indian market again made the cement industry vulnerable to fuel cost. Since then, petroleum coke has been successfully used as fuel and the use alternative fuels in cement kilns is now common and increasing. Although fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum, natural gas, etc. can provide all the energy the world needs for the time being, their finite nature, high prices and most importantly, their damaging effect on the environment underscore the need to develop alternative fuels.

Today?? cement industry becomes more challenging for the following main factors: the lowest production cost and minimum environmental impact. Beyond the cost-reduction benefits of alternative fuels, use of these fuels can contribute greatly to the environmentally sound disposal of waste and to the mitigation of greenhouse-gas emissions (GHG). Therefore, key cement players have started to consider alternative fuels as a lever to improve their contribution to sustainable development and as a key component of corporate social responsibility.

This is certainly a win-win option for both cement industry and the society at large. There is, hence, an urgent need to implement appropriate policies and practices in favor of co-processing in the country so that it can contribute reasonably towards the waste management needs of the country and help industry in substituting alternative resources in the cement manufacturing process. This would require substantial capacity building in the relevant stakeholder community ??particularly the policy makers, authorities, waste generators, facility providers and the cement plants.

Alternative Fuel options available

The range of alternative fuels is extremely wide. Use of low-grade alternative fuels such as waste coal, tyres, sewage sludge, and biomass fuels (such as wood products, agricultural waste, etc.) in pre-calciners is a feasible option since combustion in pre-calciner takes place at a lower temperature. The major Alternative Fuel available to use in India would be MSW (Municipal Solid Waste).

Sewage sludge: In several countries, sewage sludge is used in cement production. The sludge is usually co-fired with coal in pre-dried form. Pre-dried sludge is easier to store, transport and feed. However, it has a high content of SiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 which could affect the quality of cement if excess amounts are used.

Used Tyres: Combustion of whole tyres requires long residence times to obtain complete conversion. In some cement installations, tyres are fired whole, mostly in the rotary kiln. More commonly, they are shredded in a slashing process, producing tyre chunks or chips, and co-fired with coal in the precalciner. They cannot, however, be finely comminuted economically. FLSmidth offers HOTDISC? Combustion Device for high efficient firing of used tyres.

Agricultural Biomass- A largely untapped renewable energy source: The type of biomass utilized by cement plants is highly variable, and is based on the crops that are locally grown/available. For e.g., rice husk, hazelnut shells, coconut husks, corn stover, coffee pods, and palm nut shells are among the many varieties of biomass currently being burned in cement kilns. Biomass fuels are considered carbon neutral because the carbon released during combustion is taken out of the atmosphere by the species during the growth phase.

Major challenges of using agricultural biomass residues include the relatively low calorific value which can cause flame instability, and availability since most of the agricultural residues are seasonal (not available all year round). The flame instability problems could be overcome with lower substitution rates and ability to adjust air flow and flame shape.

Other major Alternative Fuels include waste oil, liquid waste, Plastic, Meat and bone meal, etc.

Benefits of using Alternative Fuels in Cement Production

Cement producers are striving to lower their production costs. One effective method of achieving this end is the use of alternative fuels.

The reduction in emissions to the atmosphere and the positive environmental impact it holds is a major benefit of Alternative Fuel firing. In pre-calciners where kiln exhaust gases pass through, the NOx emissions are much reduced due to reburn reactions. Also, there is an increased net global reduction in CO2 emissions when waste is combusted in the cement kiln systems as opposed to dedicated incinerators, resulting a reduction in penalties.

Key considerations and challenges for co-processing Alternative Fuels

The potential benefits of burning alternative fuels at cement plants are numerous. However, the contrary is possible where poor planning results in higher emissions or when they are not put to their best use with best practices.

Alternative fuels used in cement manufacturing have different characteristics compared to the conventional fuels. Switching fuels present several challenges that must be addressed in-order to achieve successful application. The type of fuel used can introduce some material components which can interfere with the chemistry of the cement materials as well as affect the operation of the system. The use of a type of fuel is hence subject to the constraints imposed by any effect on cement quality, refractory life, gas and material flow or potential emissions to the atmosphere.

Poor heat distribution, unstable pre-calciner operation, blockages in the preheater cyclones, build-ups in the kiln riser ducts, higher emissions and dusty kilns are some of the major challenges.

FLSmidth Alternative Fuel Firing Technology

Introducing alternative fuels has an impact across the plant. The materials can have totally different characteristics from fossil fuels. They can be sticky, fluffy, moist, and fluctuating in size and quality or you may need to switch between different types of fuel with very different characteristic due to governed by availability. They will burn differently, have a different reaction in the kiln and may require you to take other actions to ensure consistent clinker quality. There are a lot of variables at play ??which is why you need an experienced partner on your side.

With over 25 years of direct alternative fuels experience and more than 130 years in the cement industry, FLSmidth? offers a range of products to enable Cement Manufacturers to increase their substitution of Alternative Fuels.

JETFLEX? Burner

Cement kilns have several characteristics which make them ideal installations for disposal of waste through co-processing in an environmentally sound manner:

– High temperatures

– Long residence time

– Oxidizing atmosphere

– High thermal inertia

– Alkaline environment

– Ash retention in clinker

FLSmidth?? JETFLEX? Burner is a highly flexible kiln burner, designed to produce the best flame shape and lowest NOx emissions for various fuel types and operating conditions. It fires rotary kilns with pulverized coal or coke, oil, natural gas, or any mixture of these fuels. Alternative fuel firing of plastic chips, wood chips and sewage sludge can also occur through the same common fuel channel to improve heat and power consumption and minimize cold airflow entering from the fuel transport.

JETFLEX? PLUS Burner

For optimum combustion flexibility, our JETFLEX PLUS Burner offers superior combustion of cost-effective grade fuels, complete flame-forming control and increased fuel retention time. The two design features that characterize the JETFLEX PLUS Burner model are individually rotatable jet air nozzles and a retractable center pipe for alternative fuel firing.

The individual rotatable nozzles also enable fuel lift configuration. This is used with solid alternative fuels to increase fuel retention time in the flame. The result is less fuel drop-out, improved combustion, and improved clinker quality. The swirler is the main mechanism for shaping the flame during start-up and daily operation.

The JETFLEX PLUS burner offers retraction of the swirler and central duct. In combination with the axial air nozzles, this enables a significant drop in fuel velocity in front of the burner. This feature strongly increases the fuel retention time in the flame and enables early ignition of low grade fuels. In combination with the fuel lift configuration as noted above, spillage to the charge is minimised. This allows the burner to contribute to superior flame and clinker quality control as well as a high alternative fuel substitution.

HOTDISC? Combustion Device

The HOTDISC solution allows cement producers to substitute coal or other fossil fuels with a wide range of alternative fuels. The HOTDISC is a flagship solution for FLSmidth?? MissionZero that helps cement producers take an important step toward zero-emission cement plants by 2030. Launched in 2004 and over 35 installations worldwide, the HOTDISC Combustion Devices has already firmly established itself as an attractive technology to accelerate cement plants??transition toward alternative fuels.

From wet powders to solid waste up to 1.2 metres in diameter, our HOTDISC Combustion Device can burn them all. The waste to energy process eliminates the need for expensive shredding and gives you the flexibility to select the most economical choice from a wide range of alternative fuel options. The HOTDISC Combustion Device is designed to achieve a calciner fuel substitution rate of up to 80%, although results vary significantly depending on specific plant conditions.

As an integrated part of your kiln system, the HOTDISC Combustion Device is added onto the calciner and functions as a slow-moving disc furnace. When alternative fuel, preheated raw meal and tertiary air are fed into the HOTDISC, it produces combustion gases, partly calcined meal and combustion residues. These are then processed in the calciner alongside the other streams entering it. The result is calcined meal ready for the kiln and well-controlled emissions.

Alternative fuels are introduced onto the slowly rotating disc and they start to burn in fully-oxidising conditions when they meet the hot tertiary air. The burning fuel is transported approximately 270? on the disc until it reaches the scraper, where the remaining ash and partly calcined materials are discharged into the riser duct. Heavy combustion residues fall into the kiln inlet, while lighter fragments and combustion gases move up into the calciner.

HOTDISC-S? is a recently developed version of HOTDISC specifically to cater the needs of customers with SLC type calciners, hence enabling them to achieve Alternative Fuel firing. Two of these devices have been commissioned globally and running successfully.

Low NOx Calciner

With a goal to optimise production costs, FLSmidth?? Low NOx Calciner has been enhanced for operational stability, availability and combustion efficiency.

NOX regulations are continuously being tightened around the world. Meeting NOx emissions limits is therefore a key demand for cement producers, not only because NOx-related issues, such as smog pollution, have a direct impact on the local society, but also because your plant?? license to operate is directly linked to its NOx emissions.

Multiple fuel inlets are given to ensure optimal distribution between the kiln gases and the fuel. To achieve the best distribution between the kiln gases and the fuel, there are multiple inlets (four or six, depending on plant size). Better fuel distribution provides optimal mixing, which gives the highest average cross-sectional temperature without any build-up problems.

The Low NOX Calciner has the flexibility to burn almost any type of fuel. This includes traditional fuels, including coal and natural gas, more difficult-to-burn fuels, such as petcoke, and most solid and liquid waste fuels. These fuel types are burned while achieving low NOx and CO emissions.Primary Mitigation

Another simple solution FLSmidth? provides for reducing the NOx emissions in the existing plants is the Primary mitigation NOx reduction through calciner design changes. These are basically layout changes to create one firing location, one meal split, one air stream entering tangentially to the calciner and creating “hot zone??and ??eduction zone?? The plant system is studied and appropriate modifications are recommended. For even lower NOx emissions, FLSmidth? provides SNCR system as an add-on solution.

Kiln Gas By-pass System

Kiln gas bypass systems have traditionally only been used in regions where the local raw materials are naturally high in chloride, sulfur or alkalis. The growing use of alternative fuels and other materials is also increasing the input of chloride to kiln systems to the point that may require a bypass to maintain process stability or product quality. FLSmidth has extensive experience with the design and use of kiln bypass systems.

Main features:

– Quench chamber with dual layer dip tube

– Quench air inlet flap valve

– Control scheme for maximum stability

– Special lining design in transition pipe section

– Constant force support system

– Multiple layout possibilities

While the fundamental principles of a bypass system have not changed, state-of-the-art technology and design tools have been incorporated to improve bypass efficiency and maximise reliability. Most projects today will at least have the space for a future small chloride bypass (less than 10%) with respect to use of alternative fuels and materials.

Conclusion

The co-processing of waste as AFR disposes the waste completely and thereby eliminates the societal concerns associated with it. In Indian cement industry, if these initiatives could increase thermal substitution to the level of European countries, the cement industry can reduce its GHG emission by a significant amount, impacting the overall country?? GHG emission.

The type of fuel used in cement production is subject to the constraints imposed by its effects on cement quality, refractory life, emissions to the atmosphere, etc. and hence requires proper study and planning by specialists before implementation.

To reduce fuel cost in cement industry, globally, waste materials and low-grade fuels are co processed extensively as alternative fuels or energy sources. India still has a long way to go in ensuring greater substitution of AFRs, resulting in sizable conservation of natural materials and fossil fuels and to make the most out of the technology available for the same.

Author:

Gopika Krishnakumar

Product Line Manager

Cement Industry/Pyro Technology

FLSmidth

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy & Market

RAHSTA Roundtable Sets Agenda for Smarter, Safer Highways

Published

on

By

Shares

Roundtable discussions focus on innovation for safer highways.

Held on 12 March 2026 at Courtyard by Marriott, Mumbai, alongside the Infrastructure Today Airport Conclave, the RAHSTA Roundtable brought together stakeholders from across the highways and infrastructure ecosystem to shape the agenda for the 16th RAHSTA 2026, scheduled for 8–9 July 2026 at the Jio Convention Centre, Mumbai. The session focused on key industry themes including road construction, technology, safety and long-term sustainability.

Opening the discussion, Pratap Padode, Founder, FIRST Construction Council, said the roundtable marked the beginning of a broader consultative process leading up to the July event. The aim, he noted, is to bring together industry stakeholders to refine the agenda for discussions on the future of roads, bridges, tunnels and allied infrastructure.

Padode noted that while central road project awards have slowed in recent years, states are increasingly driving the next phase of infrastructure growth. Maharashtra, with its long-term road development plans and agencies such as MSRDC and MSIDC, is expected to play a significant role in this expansion.

RAHSTA Expo 2026 as a specialised platform dedicated to road infrastructure, covering highways, tunnels, bridges and flyovers along with construction technologies, safety systems and maintenance solutions. He also highlighted the growing importance of rural connectivity and said the organisers are engaging with government bodies to highlight rural road development initiatives.

Tanveer Padode, CIO, ASAPP Info Group, presented insights from IMPACCT, the group’s infrastructure intelligence platform. He pointed to a strong project pipeline despite slower highway awards earlier in the year, noting that states such as Maharashtra, Odisha and Arunachal Pradesh are emerging as key drivers of new projects. The data also revealed that only a small group of contractors participates in large-value infrastructure bids.

Lt Gen Rajeev Chaudhary, former Director General, Border Roads Organisation and Chairman of the RAHSTA Expo Committee, emphasised the need for stronger collaboration across the ecosystem, including policymakers, contractors, technology providers and financiers. He also called for addressing systemic issues within the sector and encouraged greater participation of women in infrastructure leadership.

The discussion also explored the evolving economics of road development. Phani Prasad Mandalaparthy, Associate Director, CRISIL Intelligence, noted that the slowdown in project awards reflects a shift towards higher-value logistics corridors rather than simple road widening projects. However, private participation through BOT and TOT models remains limited.

From the contractors’ perspective, Sudhir Hoshing, Whole-Time Director, Ceigall, said companies are becoming more selective in bidding, favouring projects with clearer payment mechanisms and efficient processes. While NHAI continues to offer greater operational clarity, states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar were cited as relatively supportive environments for project execution.

Durability and sustainability also emerged as key themes. Himanshu Agarwal, COO – Road & Infrastructure, Zydex Group India, highlighted the need to prioritise lifecycle performance and resilient pavements, while participants discussed the potential of alternative materials such as plastic waste, steel slag and industrial by-products in road construction.

Dr LR Manjunatha, Vice President, JSW Cement, emphasised that India has abundant fly ash, slag and other industrial materials that can improve durability and sustainability if integrated into specifications and policy frameworks.

Technology and equipment challenges were also discussed. Dr Lakshmana Rao Mantri, Dy General Manager, Afcons Infrastructure, highlighted the shortage of tunnel boring machines (TBMs), which is delaying several underground infrastructure projects. Participants agreed that developing domestic TBM manufacturing capabilities will be critical for future infrastructure expansion.

The future of concrete pavements was another area of discussion. Dr V Ramachandra, President, Indian Concrete Institute, stressed that the debate should focus on lifecycle performance rather than material choice alone, noting that evolving design standards are improving the feasibility of concrete roads.

Prof Dharamveer Singh of IIT Bombay added that while India has made significant progress in infrastructure development, stronger capacity building and better execution practices are essential to ensure consistent road quality.

The discussion also touched upon technology adoption in the sector. Rushabh Mamania, Partner & CBO, Roadvision, highlighted the growing role of AI in road infrastructure, noting that AI-driven monitoring systems are already being deployed across large stretches of national highways.

Overall, the roundtable underscored that the future of highway infrastructure will depend not only on the pace of construction but also on durability, safety, technology integration and sustainable materials. The discussions offered valuable insights that will help shape the agenda for RAHSTA 2026 and guide future collaboration within the industry.

Continue Reading

Economy & Market

CTS Roundtable Charts Tech-Led Roadmap for Construction

Published

on

By

Shares

CTS Roundtable Maps Technology Roadmap for Construction

Ahead of the Construction Technology Show (Con Tech Show) 2026, industry leaders, technology innovators and academia came together in Mumbai to deliberate on how digitalisation, automation and industrialised construction can reshape the sector. The discussion made one thing clear: construction can no longer afford to treat technology as optional.

Held on 12 March 2026 at Courtyard by Marriott, Mumbai, alongside the Infrastructure Today Airport Conclave, the CTS Roundtable served as a precursor to the Construction Technology Show 2026, scheduled for 19–20 August 2026 at NESCO, Mumbai.

A platform to move from discussion to deployment

Opening the session, Pratap Padode, Founder and Editor-in-Chief, ASAPP Info Global Group, said construction technology has long remained close to his heart, especially given the sector’s traditionally slow pace of technology adoption. He noted that over the years, the Construction Technology Summit had steadily built interest, and the next step was now to expand it into a larger, more meaningful platform that could bring together technology providers, users, startups and innovators under one roof.

Padode said the vision for CTS is not limited to software alone. The platform aims to embrace all forms of technology that can improve construction efficiency, quality and execution—from digital tools and project management systems to lean construction, off-site fabrication and startup-led innovation. He also highlighted plans to deepen startup participation and create space for young companies to showcase emerging construction solutions.

Industry at a turning point

Moderating the roundtable, Naushad Panjwani, Chairman, Mandarus Partners, set the context by pointing out that the global construction industry, despite being a multi-trillion-dollar sector, continues to lag in productivity. He noted that while manufacturing has consistently improved efficiency, construction has remained slow to modernise.

Referring to both global and Indian trends, Panjwani underlined that the industry is now at a decisive moment. India, he said, is entering a major build cycle, and delivering the next phase of infrastructure and real estate growth through traditional methods alone is no longer viable. The goal of the roundtable, therefore, was not to debate technology in isolation, but to identify the most critical conversations that would bridge the gap between innovation and implementation.

His central message was clear: CTS 2026 must be shaped around themes that make CEOs, CIOs and CTOs feel they cannot afford to miss the event.

From BIM to AI, data to governance

A major theme that emerged through the discussion was the need for better data, better visibility and better decision-making. Dr Venkata Santosh Kumar of IIT Bombay echoed this, saying that the underlying data infrastructure itself needs attention. Construction projects, particularly remote ones, often face issues around connectivity, data collection and data use. Without this foundation, more advanced technologies cannot deliver their full value.

Chandra Vasireddy, CEO & Co-founder, Inncircles, expanded the discussion to governance, arguing that technology must help connect the many moving parts of a construction business. For him, the real value of digital transformation lies in creating better governance, clearer visibility and stronger business outcomes.

Tejas Vara of Inncircles stressed the importance of timely site data for leadership teams, especially in large and remote projects where decisions on materials, machinery and manpower often get delayed because information does not reach headquarters in time.

The role of AI also featured prominently. Rushabh Mamania, Partner and CBO, Roadvision said that while AI and machine learning are now common terms, vision intelligence and language intelligence have still not deeply penetrated the construction sector. He emphasised that startups in India are building relevant AI-led solutions and are already attracting international interest, showing that innovation need not be imported—it can be built locally and scaled globally.

Industrialised construction gains ground

The roundtable also placed strong emphasis on industrialised construction methods. Kalyan Vaidyanathan, CTO – Construction & R&D, Tvasta, called for greater focus on off-site fabrication and the broader industrialisation of construction. Bhargav Jog, General Manager, Dextra, highlighted precast technology and alternative sustainable materials as areas with immediate relevance.

Several participants agreed that modular, precast and pre-engineered approaches are no longer niche ideas. They are increasingly becoming practical responses to the sector’s challenges around labour shortage, timelines, quality control and predictability.

Anup Mathew, Sr VP & Business Head, Godrej, argued that the industry needs a fully integrated approach—from design and procurement to execution and asset management. Unless these are connected, technology adoption will remain fragmented and sub-optimal. He pointed to pre-engineered and modular systems as examples of how industrial thinking can compress timelines, improve quality and reduce dependence on difficult on-site conditions.

Adoption remains the biggest hurdle

While there was broad agreement on the promise of technology, the discussion repeatedly returned to one fundamental challenge: adoption.

Abhishek Kumar, COO, LivSYT, observed that the market is crowded with solutions, but many buyers still struggle to evaluate which technology suits which use case. According to him, the industry needs clearer frameworks to help users select, compare and adopt solutions, rather than expecting a single platform to solve every problem.

Dr Tenepalli JaiSai, Associate Professor, School of Construction(SoC), NICMAR University, noted that isolated technologies will not solve the productivity problem by themselves. What is required is an integrated Construction 4.0 approach, where digital, physical and cyber-physical systems work together rather than in silos.

That concern around silos was reinforced by Subodh Dixit, former Director, Shapoorji Pallonji, who said the issue is not just that technologies are disconnected, but that stakeholders are as well. Clients, consultants, contractors and partners often operate with different priorities. Unless these silos are broken, technology will struggle to percolate across the full project value chain.

Harleen Oberoi, Project Management, Tata Realty shared a practical perspective from the client side, saying that successful BIM implementation requires investment across the ecosystem, not just within one organisation. Trade partners, vendors and other stakeholders must also be trained and aligned if the technology is to deliver its intended results.

Beyond buzzwords

A notable takeaway from the session was that the industry is moving past the phase of treating technology as a buzzword. Participants repeatedly stressed that the real question is not whether technology should be used, but where it creates measurable value and how that value can be scaled.

The conversation also expanded beyond mainstream themes to include repairs and rehabilitation, construction and demolition waste, sustainability, circular economy, green sourcing, carbon measurement, design interoperability, generative design, robotics, and the role of horticulture and greener built environments.

Setting the agenda for CTS 2026

By the close of the session, the roundtable had surfaced a strong set of themes for the upcoming show: BIM and digital twins, AI and data platforms, industrialised construction, startup innovation, governance-led technology adoption, robotics, sustainable materials, and integrated project delivery.

More importantly, the session established CTS 2026 as more than an exhibition. It is shaping up to be a serious industry platform where users, technology providers, researchers and policymakers can collectively define the future of construction.

As Padode noted in his closing remarks, the conversation will continue through further consultations and possibly webinars in the run-up to the show. If the roundtable is any indication, CTS 2026 will aim not merely to showcase technology, but to push the industry towards meaningful adoption at scale.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Human Factor in Grinding Optimisation

Published

on

By

Shares

Ponnusamy Sampathkumar, Consultant – Process Optimisation and Training, discusses the role of skilled operators as the decisive link between advanced additives, digital control and world-class mill performance.

The industry always tries to reduce the number of operators in the Centre Control Room. (CCR) Though the concept was succeeded to certain extent, still we need a skilled person in the CCR.
In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) grinding aids, performance enhancers, and digital optimisation tools are becoming increasingly sophisticated, it’s tempting to believe that chemistry alone can solve the challenges of mill efficiency. Yet plants that consistently outperform their peers share one common trait: highly skilled operators who understand the mill as a living system, not just a machine.
Additives can improve flowability, reduce agglomeration, and enhance separator efficiency, but they cannot replace the nuanced judgement that comes from experience. Grinding is a dynamic process influenced by raw material variability, moisture, liner wear, ball charge distribution, ventilation, and separator loading. No additive can fully compensate for poor control of these fundamentals.

Operators see what additives cannot
When I joined the cement industry in 1981, not much modernisation was available then. Mostly the equipment was run from the local panel. Once I was visiting the cement mills section. The cement mills were water sprayed over the shell to reduce the temperature to avoid the gypsum disintegration.
The operator stopped the feeding for one of the mills. When I asked the reason, he replied that mill was getting jammed, and he added that he could understand the mill condition by its sound. I also learned that and it was useful throughout my career. In another plant I saw the ‘Electronic Ear,’ which checked the sound of the mill and the signal was looped with feed control!
Whatever modernisation we achieve, it is from the human factor that the development starts.
Additives respond to conditions; operators interpret them.
A skilled operator can detect subtle shifts, like a change in mill sound, a slight variation in circulating load, or a drift in separator cut point. It’s long before instrumentation flags a problem. These micro-observations often prevent major efficiency losses.
Additives work best when the process is stable
I would like to share one real time incident. The mill was running on auto mode looped with the mill outlet bucket elevator kilowatt. (KW)There was a decrease in the KW, and the mill feed was increased by the auto control (PID). After a while, the operator stopped both the feed and the mill. He asked the local operator to check the airslide between mill outlet and the elevator. They found the airslide was jammed and no material flow to the elevator!
The operator deduced the abnormality by his experience by seeing the conditions and the rate of increase of the feed by the auto control.
It’s always the human factor that adds value to the optimisation.

Grinding aids are multipliers,
not magicians.
They deliver maximum benefit only when:
• Mill ventilation is correct
• Ball charge is balanced
• Feed moisture is controlled
• Separator speed and loading are improved
• Blaine targets are realistic
Without these fundamentals, even advanced additives may become costly investments. The operator is responsible for ensuring process stability, whether using a ball mill or a vertical mill. After ensuring the system is stable, the operator observes it briefly before transitioning to automatic control. If there is any anomaly in the system the operator at once takes control of the system, stabilises and bring back to auto control.

Skilled operators adapt in real time
It will be interesting to note that the operators who operate from local panel start to operate from DCS also. They have the experience and the ability to adapt the changes. Operator checks each parameter deeply. Any meagre change in the parameters is also visible to him.
Raw materials change. Weather changes. Wear patterns change.
A skilled operator adjusts:
• Feed rate
• Water injection
• Separator speed
• Grinding pressure (in VRMs)
• Mill load distribution.
These adjustments require intuition built from years of experience, something no additive can replicate.

Human insight prevents over reliance on additives
Plants sometimes increase additive dosage to mask deeper issues like:
• Poor clinker quality
• Inadequate drying capacity
• Incorrect ball gradation
• High residue due to worn separator internals.


A knowledgeable operator finds root causes instead of chasing temporary chemical fixes.
The real optimisation sweet spot is reached when:
• Operators understand how additives interact with their specific mill.
• Additive suppliers collaborate with plant teams.
• Process data is interpreted by humans who know the mill’s behaviour.
This constructive collaboration consistently delivers:
• Lower kWh/t
• Higher throughput
• Better product consistency
• Optimum standard deviation.

Advanced additives are powerful tools, but they are not substitutes for human ability. Grinding optimisation is ultimately a human driven discipline, where skilled operators make the difference between average performance and world class efficiency. Additives enhance the process but operators
control it.

About the author:
Ponnusamy Sampathkumar, Consultant – Process Optimisation and Training, is a seasoned cement process consultant with 43+ years of global experience in plant operations, process optimisation, refractory management, safety systems and training multicultural teams across international cement plants.

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds