Connect with us

Concrete

For successful project delivery, promptness and proactive action is the key

Published

on

Shares

Bidyut Bhattacharya, Technical Director, Sinoma International Engg Co India

There are ample challenges in putting up a cement plant these days. Scope changes during the implementation phase can be a big drag. It is extremely important to review capability and past credentials of the engineering firm, says Bidyut Bhattacharya, Technical Director, Sinoma International Engg Co India. Excerpts from the interview.

Which are the geographical regions that are driving demand in your sector?

Generally speaking, overall the scenario is a bit muted these days. In spite of overcapacity issues, we still see movement in the Andhra- Karnataka belt.

What are the major challenges that you face when it comes to the design, erection and commissioning of a cement plant?

There are ample challenges in putting up a cement plant these days. Scope changes during the implementation phase can be a big drag. Sometimes, not-so-clear regulatory requirements also lead to changes in scope. Then there are instances of revision on plant capacity during execution. Often, such changes are the result of inadequate feasibility studies done at the project planning stage. It is extremely important to review capability and past credentials of the engineering firm.

Availability of construction labour force (skilled/semiskilled) also is a major challenge these days. These workers mostly come from the eastern part of India. Maintaining adequate site strength during or just after the festival seasons becomes a nightmare. Productivity is also an issue and falls far below the levels achieved in even other emerging economies.

Another aspect is basic awareness about health and safety requirements on construction sites. Unfortunately, in India, safety consciousness is rather limited even up to the technician level, and falls very short of the expectations of multinational companies.

Getting final regulatory clearances before commissioning could also be a challenge, particularly if you are not so well versed in handling such issues in a prudent way. Finally, the sluggish economy is taking its toll on the clients and their ability to clear the monthly dues and other payments on time. Such a scenario and delayed payments become a real challenge for the project progress and time/cost overruns may be unavoidable in spite of all good intentions.

Changing the layout, in many cases, seems to be a major issue. Does it indicate the inadequacy of project management team?

In extreme cases, we have seen layout changes happening during the execution phase. This is frustrating for anyone involved in the project, and leads to time and cost overruns, apart from possible disputes with the client. Quite often, such layout changes can be attributed to land acquisition problems or to geo-technical reasons. Considering long term requirements for the finalisation of land acquisition, some amount of work is done on a parallel track. You cannot always blame the project management for inadequate risk perception.

However, when it comes to layout changes due to inadequate geo-technical investigations upfront, project management cannot avoid the blame. It is important to conduct a detailed soil investigation and firm up foundation requirements during the feasibility phase of any project. My experience says that multinational companies are generally more demanding in terms of feasibility study requirements.

What is the scenario regarding the repair / retrofitting of existing plants?

We, as Sinoma, are less involved in this particular field directly, as far as India is concerned. However, LNVT India, our subsidiary in India, has a vast experience in retrofit jobs.

How do you assess the interface between a consulting agency, cement manufacturers and various plant and machinery OEMs and auxiliary equipment suppliers?

The consultant is almost always employed by the owner and plays a vital role as the interface between the client and the contractor. In spite of that, it is important on the part of the consultants to project a more neutral stance. I strongly believe that an impartial consultant actually aids the overall implementation of the project to a great extent. In that sense, the FIDIC concept seems more productive to the interests of the project.

How do you tackle unforeseen problems while executing big projects?

Project execution is not a cakewalk and the project management needs to be on their toes throughout. Unexpected problems are bound to crop up, and the team needs to consider all possible options, one by one, and select the optimum. Pressures due to time/cost overruns makes life more difficult. For successful project delivery, promptness and proactive action is the key. For example, in a recent project, while excavating for the deep wagon tippler pit, we encountered an isolated patch of extremely hard rock. The geotechnical investigation conducted earlier a few meters from the spot, did not identify it. Various sizes of rock breakers were employed but they failed to achieve the desired result. Considering the project being implemented inside an operating plant and in an extremely congested layout, an alternative decision was not easy. Layout change was absolutely out of question. Eventually we had to think about not just controlled blasting but super controlled blasting – which did work. Swift and proactive decision- making in terms of the best available option was the key.

What kinds of energy efficiency measures do you recommend to your clients?

In terms of overall energy efficiency, at Sinoma we strongly recommend waste heat recovery from both kiln and grate cooler. For the coolers themselves, we recommend fourth-generation walking floor type or moving bar/S- type grate coolers. High efficiency high momentum burner pipes are a must. Modern design, low pressure drop – high efficiency pre-heater cyclones also plays an important part. For grinding, we recommend roll press and vertical mills depending upon the process and materials.

The amount of energy saving varies on a case- to- case basis depending on the actual selection of process and equipment, quality and consistency of fuel, raw material characteristics, etc. However, it is important to understand here that long- term plant energy efficiency cannot be guaranteed based on the mere selection of the most efficient individual equipment alone. Rather, over a long term, energy (fuel and power) efficiency is largely driven by uniformity of the kiln feed chemistry, mastery of the burning zone which is primarily a kiln operation, and plant reliability factor i.e, avoiding stoppages due to incidents; all this in turn, relates to plant preventive maintenance.

What is your take on the lack of highly skilled technicians and experienced engineers in your sector?

We do not see a lack of skilled technicians or engineers as a real problem in India. Particularly in the field of construction, the right supervisory people are available at a reasonable cost. We feel the real problem here is availability of a sufficiently skilled labour force. Thanks to the MGNREGA scheme, a large shortage has been created. The majority of these construction workers come from the eastern part of India these days, and their availability during or after the festive season also affects site activity. Site productivity per unit of manpower deployed remains a bottleneck. Also, a serious problem is the lack of knowledge/understanding of basic health and safety requirements. In the highly skilled sector, the issues have to do with attitude/motivation rather than technical skills or knowledge.

Opportunities and challenges for EPC companies in India

Firstly, with promoters like multinational companies such as Lafarge, Holcim, Heidelberg, ItalCementi etc, EPC projects in the cement industry has now become widespread in the Middle East, African continent, south-east Asia, China, Russia and South America. However, EPC has not yet taken root in India. In the past ten years, most of the new cement production line projects were tendered and executed in a number of packages. However, in order to avoid potential risks to the owner (such as delayed project schedule, missed interfaces, etc), and to cap the investment during the execution of the project, these international leaders still look for EPC. The Holcim Group’s recent 9000tpd project could probably be a milestone project for the future of the Indian cement industry, one which all the EPC companies are keeping a close eye on. If the project is a success, it may usher in a new era for the Indian cement industry.

Also, smaller-sized cement producers, especially new entrants, will have a better appetite for EPC, unlike leading cement companies who have full- fledged project engineering and management teams. Clients in this segment are keen to minimise their overheads, while focusing on faster returns on investment with minimum risk. EPC will be a good choice for them. On the other hand, for plants requiring repair/retrofitting projects and new installation of WHR system, EPC will be the best solution. We strongly believe that in the near future, the Indian cement industry will replicate the most popular international model i.e, EPC. It may not be very prudent to assess the bottomline before the start of the project alone. Delays and cost overruns at the end of most of the projects will prompt clients to rethink their contracting mode. A successful project goes beyond mere mix- and- match of best available equipment, timely completion and capping on cost is vital. Clearly, more EPC players will emerge, catering to the needs of the new age Indian cement industry. The biggest challenge, however, to the contractors, is the actual strength in integrating EP and C. Typical equipment manufacturers look for a pure EP as they often lack major construction experience or are reluctant to take the risk. Quite often, the OEMs have to form a JV for the execution of a real EPC project. Other challenges involve delays in regulatory clearances, high inflationary trends and a high interest rate scenario resulting in serious cost overruns of delayed projects, availability of a sufficiently skilled labour force throughout, reduced economic growth resulting in the client’s ability to clear its payment obligations on time and of course, the complicated prevailing tax regime, till GST rollout.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Concrete

FORNNAX Appoints Dieter Jerschl as Sales Partner for Central Europe

Published

on

By

Shares

FORNNAX TECHNOLOGY has appointed industry veteran Dieter Jerschl as its new sales partner in Germany to strengthen its presence across Central Europe. The partnership aims to accelerate the adoption of FORNNAX’s high-capacity, sustainable recycling solutions while building long-term regional capabilities.

FORNNAX TECHNOLOGY, one of the leading advanced recycling equipment manufacturers, has announced the appointment of a new sales partner in Germany as part of its strategic expansion into Central Europe. The company has entered into a collaborative agreement with Mr. Dieter Jerschl, a seasoned industry professional with over 20 years of experience in the shredding and recycling sector, to represent and promote FORNNAX’s solutions across key European markets.

Mr. Jerschl brings extensive expertise from his work with renowned companies such as BHS, Eldan, Vecoplan, and others. Over the course of his career, he has successfully led the deployment of both single machines and complete turnkey installations for a wide range of applications, including tyre recycling, cable recycling, municipal solid waste, e-waste, and industrial waste processing.

Speaking about the partnership, Mr. Jerschl said,
“I’ve known FORNNAX for over a decade and have followed their growth closely. What attracted me to this collaboration is their state-of-the-art & high-capacity technology, it is powerful, sustainable, and economically viable. There is great potential to introduce FORNNAX’s innovative systems to more markets across Europe, and I am excited to be part of that journey.”

The partnership will primarily focus on Central Europe, including Germany, Austria, and neighbouring countries, with the flexibility to extend the geographical scope based on project requirements and mutual agreement. The collaboration is structured to evolve over time, with performance-driven expansion and ongoing strategic discussions with FORNNAX’s management. The immediate priority is to build a strong project pipeline and enhance FORNNAX’s brand presence across the region.

FORNNAX’s portfolio of high-performance shredding and pre-processing solutions is well aligned with Europe’s growing demand for sustainable and efficient waste treatment technologies. By partnering with Mr. Jerschl—who brings deep market insight and established industry relationships—FORNNAX aims to accelerate adoption of its solutions and participate in upcoming recycling projects across the region.

As part of the partnership, Mr. Jerschl will also deliver value-added services, including equipment installation, maintenance, and spare parts support through a dedicated technical team. This local service capability is expected to ensure faster project execution, minimise downtime, and enhance overall customer experience.

Commenting on the long-term vision, Mr. Jerschl added,
“We are committed to increasing market awareness and establishing new reference projects across the region. My goal is not only to generate business but to lay the foundation for long-term growth. Ideally, we aim to establish a dedicated FORNNAX legal entity or operational site in Germany over the next five to ten years.”

For FORNNAX, this partnership aligns closely with its global strategy of expanding into key markets through strong regional representation. The company believes that local partnerships are critical for navigating complex market dynamics and delivering solutions tailored to region-specific waste management challenges.

“We see tremendous potential in the Central European market,” said Mr. Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO of FORNNAX.
“Partnering with someone as experienced and well-established as Mr. Jerschl gives us a strong foothold and allows us to better serve our customers. This marks a major milestone in our efforts to promote reliable, efficient and future-ready recycling solutions globally,” he added.

This collaboration further strengthens FORNNAX’s commitment to environmental stewardship, innovation, and sustainable waste management, supporting the transition toward a greener and more circular future.

 

Continue Reading

Concrete

Budget 2026–27 infra thrust and CCUS outlay to lift cement sector outlook

Published

on

By

Shares

Higher capex, city-led growth and CCUS funding improve demand visibility and decarbonisation prospects for cement

Mumbai

Cement manufacturers have welcomed the Union Budget 2026–27’s strong infrastructure thrust, with public capital expenditure increased to Rs 12.2 trillion, saying it reinforces infrastructure as the central engine of economic growth and strengthens medium-term prospects for the cement sector. In a statement, the Cement Manufacturers’ Association (CMA) has welcomed the Union budget 2026-27 for reinforcing the ambitions for the nation’s growth balancing the aspirations of the people through inclusivity inspired by the vision of Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India, for a Viksit Bharat by 2047 and Atmanirbharta.

The budget underscores India’s steady economic trajectory over the past 12 years, marked by fiscal discipline, sustained growth and moderate inflation, and offers strong demand visibility for infrastructure linked sectors such as cement.

The Budget’s strong infrastructure push, with public capital expenditure rising from Rs 11.2 trillion in fiscal year 2025–26 to Rs 12.2 trillion in fiscal year 2026–27, recognises infrastructure as the primary anchor for economic growth creating positive prospects for the Indian cement industry and improving long term visibility for the cement sector. The emphasis on Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities with populations above 5 lakh and the creation of City Economic Regions (CERs) with an allocation of Rs 50 billion per CER over five years, should accelerate construction activity across housing, transport and urban services, supporting broad based cement consumption.

Logistics and connectivity measures announced in the budget are particularly significant for the cement industry. The announcement of new dedicated freight corridors, the operationalisation of 20 additional National Waterways over the next five years, the launch of the Coastal Cargo Promotion Scheme to raise the modal share of waterways and coastal shipping from 6 per cent to 12 per cent by 2047, and the development of ship repair ecosystems should enhance multimodal freight efficiency, reduce logistics costs and improve the sector’s carbon footprint. The announcement of seven high speed rail corridors as growth corridors can be expected to further stimulate regional development and construction demand.

Commenting on the budget, Parth Jindal, President, Cement Manufacturers’ Association (CMA), said, “As India advances towards a Viksit Bharat, the three kartavya articulated in the Union Budget provide a clear context for the Nation’s growth and aspirations, combining economic momentum with capacity building and inclusive progress. The Cement Manufacturers’ Association (CMA) appreciates the Union Budget 2026-27 for the continued emphasis on manufacturing competitiveness, urban development and infrastructure modernisation, supported by over 350 reforms spanning GST simplification, labour codes, quality control rationalisation and coordinated deregulation with States. These reforms, alongside the Budget’s focus on Youth Power and domestic manufacturing capacity under Atmanirbharta, stand to strengthen the investment environment for capital intensive sectors such as Cement. The Union Budget 2026-27 reflects the Government’s focus on infrastructure led development emerging as a structural pillar of India’s growth strategy.”

He added, “The Rs 200 billion CCUS outlay for various sectors, including Cement, fundamentally alters the decarbonisation landscape for India’s emissions intensive industries. CCUS is a significant enabler for large scale decarbonisation of industries such as Cement and this intervention directly addresses the technology and cost requirements of the Cement sector in context. The Cement Industry, fully aligned with the Government of India’s Net Zero commitment by 2070, views this support as critical to enabling the adoption and scale up of CCUS technologies while continuing to meet the Country’s long term infrastructure needs.”

Dr Raghavpat Singhania, Vice President, CMA, said, “The government’s sustained infrastructure push supports employment, regional development and stronger local supply chains. Cement manufacturing clusters act as economic anchors across regions, generating livelihoods in construction, logistics and allied sectors. The budget’s focus on inclusive growth, execution and system level enablers creates a supportive environment for responsible and efficient expansion offering opportunities for economic growth and lending momentum to the cement sector. The increase in public capex to Rs 12.2 trillion, the focus on Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, and the creation of City Economic Regions stand to strengthen the growth of the cement sector. We welcome the budget’s emphasis on tourism, cultural and social infrastructure, which should broaden construction activity across regions. Investments in tourism facilities, heritage and Buddhist circuits, regional connectivity in Purvodaya and North Eastern States, and the strengthening of emergency and trauma care infrastructure in district hospitals reinforce the cement sector’s role in enabling inclusive growth.”

CMA also noted the Government’s continued commitment to fiscal discipline, with the fiscal deficit estimated at 4.3 per cent of GDP in FY27, reinforcing macroeconomic stability and investor confidence.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Steel: Shielded or Strengthened?

CW explores the impact of pro-steel policies on construction and infrastructure and identifies gaps that need to be addressed.

Published

on

By

Shares

Going forward, domestic steel mills are targeting capacity expansion
of nearly 40 per cent through till FY31, adding 80-85 mt, translating
into an investment pipeline of $ 45-50 billion. So, Jhunjhunwala points
out that continuing the safeguard duty will be vital to prevent a surge
in imports and protect domestic prices from external shocks. While in
FY26, the industry operating profit per tonne is expected to hold at
around $ 108, similar to last year, the industry’s earnings must
meaningfully improve from hereon to sustain large-scale investments.
Else, domestic mills could experience a significant spike in industry
leverage levels over the medium term, increasing their vulnerability to
external macroeconomic shocks.(~$ 60/tonne) over the past one month,
compressing the import parity discount to ~$ 23-25/tonne from previous
highs of ~$ 70-90/tonne, adds Jhunjhunwala. With this, he says, “the
industry can expect high resistance to further steel price increases.”

Domestic HRC prices have increased by ~Rs 5,000/tonne
“Aggressive
capacity additions (~15 mt commissioned in FY25, with 5 mt more by
FY26) have created a supply overhang, temporarily outpacing demand
growth of ~11-12 mt,” he says…

To read the full article Click Here

Continue Reading

Trending News