Concrete

Green Construction through Cement Innovation

Published

4 weeks ago

July 21, 2026

admin

ICR and Fuller Technologies brought industry, policy and technology leaders together to discuss how cement innovation can drive green construction at scale.

India is building at a pace few countries can match. Highways, airports, housing, logistics parks, industrial corridors and urban infrastructure are reshaping the country’s economic geography. But beneath this growth story lies a difficult question: can India continue to build at scale without locking itself into a high-carbon future?
That question formed the core of an online panel discussion titled ‘Driving Green Construction Through Cement Innovation’, organised by Indian Cement Review (ICR) in association with Fuller Technologies as the Presenting Partner on June 25, 2026. The webinar brought together experts from cement technology, R&D, global industry platforms, building performance policy and international development cooperation to examine how low-carbon cement and material innovation can accelerate India’s green construction transition.
The discussion came at a crucial time. India has committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2070 and reducing the carbon intensity of its economy by 45 per cent by 2030. At the same time, the country’s construction sector is expanding rapidly, driven by urbanisation, infrastructure development, housing demand and industrial growth. Cement, as one of the most widely used construction materials, sits at the heart of this transition. It is indispensable to development, but also central to the challenge of reducing embodied carbon in buildings and infrastructure.
Moderated by Nitika Krishan, Senior Urban Infrastructure and Sustainable Policy Consultant, the panel featured:
• Kiranmai Sanagavarapu, Director, Low Carbon Solutions, Fuller Technologies;
• Dr Hemantkumar Aiyer, VP and Head R&D, Nuvoco Vistas;
• Devika Wattal, Innovation Lead, Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA);
• Dr Sunita Purushottam, MD, GBPN India (Global Buildings Performance Network); and
• Vaibhav Rathi, Senior Technical Advisor, GIZ (the German Agency for International Cooperation)
Setting the tone for the discussion, Krishan underlined the scale of the challenge before the sector. “The question before us is no longer whether we build, but how we build sustainably,” she said. She pointed out that construction accounts for nearly 40 per cent of global energy-related carbon emissions when both operational and embodied carbon are considered. Cement production, she added, remains one of the hardest industrial processes to decarbonise.
For India, this is not merely an environmental issue. It is a development issue, a competitiveness issue and increasingly, a market issue. As one of the world’s largest cement producers and among the fastest-growing construction markets, India’s material choices will influence the carbon trajectory of its built environment for decades. As Krishan observed, sustainability solutions in economies such as India must not remain limited to laboratory success. They must be scalable, commercially viable and practical at national level.

The innovation gap: From technology to market
Experts believe that there is a need to bridge the innovation gaps for making decarbonisation in cement and concrete scalable. Wattal explained, “The starting point must be the core cement manufacturing process itself. The first and foremost is the heart of our process, the heart of cement manufacturing. How do we reduce clinker? That is always a topic where industry is working very intrinsically.”
Clinker reduction remains one of the most important pathways for lowering emissions in cement. Since clinker production is energy-intensive and chemically emits carbon dioxide, reducing the clinker factor through supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), blended cements and new chemistries can have a significant impact. Wattal also noted that carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) will have a role, though it may not be the first lever for all markets.
However, she stressed that innovation cannot stop at technology development. A solution that works in the lab must also be adaptable to industry, scalable in production and acceptable in construction practice. “It is important for that innovation to be adaptable, to be scalable, and so that it can be executed in real time,” she said.
Wattal also called for stronger enabling systems around innovation. These include performance-based standards, product-level embodied carbon databases and clearer frameworks for evaluating green materials. Without these, low-carbon cement products may struggle to compete with conventional materials in procurement and design.

R&D must balance carbon, cost and performance
Bringing in the R&D perspective into the discussion, Dr Aiyer emphasised that low-carbon cement development cannot be treated as a single-variable exercise. Cement must perform in real construction conditions. It must deliver strength, durability, consistency and cost competitiveness, while also reducing carbon.
“The root of understanding and balancing all these aspects lies in materials, and knowing the materials,” he said.
According to Dr Aiyer, R&D teams must understand the variability of raw materials such as fly ash, slag and clinker. Different sources produce different material behaviours. This makes mix optimisation, material characterisation and processing-property relationships critical. When performance is affected, cement manufacturers must understand how strength enhancers, admixtures and other performance chemicals interact with the material system.
He also linked material science with process efficiency. Clinkerisation takes place at extremely high temperatures, around 1,400 to 1,450 degrees Celsius. Any improvement in raw mix design, process control or energy optimisation can, therefore, help reduce emissions and cost. Dr Aiyer pointed to artificial intelligence-based optimisation, Cement 4.0 tools and advanced software as important enablers for real-time process and material control.
“The more you understand the materials, the more you can control it,” he said.

LC3: The promise is proven, the sequencing is not
Limestone calcined clay cement, commonly referred to as LC3, has attracted global attention because it can reduce clinker content significantly by using calcined clay and limestone while maintaining performance in many applications. Sanagavarapu said the technology itself has already moved beyond proof of concept. Fuller Technologies has worked with calcined clay technology for nearly two decades and has seen plants running in France and Ghana. These plants, she said, are meeting local and national specifications, while the economics are beginning to make sense.
“The calciner is performing, the economics is stacking up, it is making business sense to produce,” she said.
But if the technology is viable, why has adoption not scaled faster? For Sanagavarapu, the answer lies in project sequencing. Too often, clay characterisation happens after equipment is specified. This, she warned, is a backward approach because calciner design depends on clay mineralogy, kaolinite content, iron levels, reactivity, moisture and other variables.
“If you don’t know what your deposit looks like before you commit for the equipment, you are, in a way, going blind into designing,” she said.
She also identified permitting and plant integration as major bottlenecks. Environmental clearances, mining permissions and local regulatory approvals must begin early. Similarly, calcined clay must be integrated into existing grinding, blending and logistics systems from the design stage, not treated as an afterthought during commissioning.
India already has IS 18189:2023 standard for LC3, but Sanagavarapu pointed out that the standard is not yet visible enough in procurement documents. “The gap between what is technically being permitted and what the procurement is asking is the single biggest bottleneck,” she said.
In her view, successful scale-up depends on getting the sequence right: clay characterisation first, permitting in parallel, standards aligned with construction, and integration built into plant design.

India’s LC3 journey: Progress, but demand remains thin
Providing details of India’s LC3 commercialisation experience, Rathi noted that JK Cement carried out the first commercial production of LC3 at its Rajasthan plant, followed by JK Lakshmi Cement three months later. These initiatives were supported by the International Climate Initiative of the Government of Germany, with IIT Delhi contributing deep institutional knowledge on LC3 research and BIS certification.
Rathi said India’s early experience has produced clear lessons. One of the biggest was the need to build capacity among regulators. While BIS certification existed, State Pollution Control Boards were unfamiliar with the technology and unsure about the approval pathway.
“The capacity building is not just needed amongst the producer and the users of the cement, but also the regulators who are working with this technology for the first time,” he said.
He also highlighted the need for better information on China clay deposits. Since China clay is currently classified as a minor mineral, centralised data on availability, quality and location is limited. If cement manufacturers are to adopt LC3 at scale, stronger mineral intelligence will be important.
The third issue is demand. LC3 has already been used in projects such as Palava City in Mumbai and Noida International Airport, but these remain limited examples. “It is in a chicken and egg situation,” Rathi said. “Cement companies are saying we need more demand, and users are saying there is not enough cement available.”
Public procurement, he suggested, could help break this cycle. If agencies such as CPWD and other public bodies begin testing, accepting and specifying LC3, it could create the market confidence needed for cement companies to invest in production and storage.

Building codes must catch up with innovation
Dr Purushottam argued that material choices will determine built environment emissions over the long term, but India’s current policy signals remain fragmented. Although LC3 has received BIS recognition, she pointed out that building codes, municipal bylaws, schedules of rates and sustainability codes do not yet provide uniform guidance on low-carbon cement.
“The current cement regulations are largely prescriptive and favouring traditional materials,” she said. This limits the ability of alternative materials to compete on performance, durability and emissions.
Dr Purushottam also raised the issue of taxation. Cement, including LC3, currently falls under the same GST bracket as conventional cement. A differentiated tax structure, she argued, could help accelerate market adoption. “In order for the market to demand LC3, that differentiation in the GST could go a long way,” she said.
She noted that green building certifications such as IGBC and GRIHA are already creating demand for low-carbon materials by assigning points for embodied carbon and sustainable material use. However, she said large-scale adoption will require regulatory mandates, particularly through building codes and state-level notifications.
She also cautioned that low-carbon cement alone does not solve the entire building performance problem. A material may reduce embodied carbon, but the operational carbon of a building depends on thermal performance, design, insulation and energy use. “The energy part has two elements,” she said. “One is the embodied carbon of the material itself, and the other is the operational carbon.”

Collaboration is the bridge between invention and impact
Wattal said GCCA sees innovation as a strategic priority and works through platforms that connect industry with academia and start-ups. “There is no way we will decarbonise our sector without innovation,” she said.
However, she stressed that research must be connected to actual industry challenges. Innovations developed in isolation may fail when they encounter real-world barriers such as raw material variability, plant integration, cost, standards and finance.
Start-ups, too, need industry mentorship and scale-up pathways.
Wattal also flagged the importance of finance. Even strong technologies may struggle to attract investment if there is no common understanding of bankability. “We have always put projects into, is this a bankable project? But the definition of a bankable project has never been defined,” she said.
For India, she saw strong potential in its academic and start-up ecosystem, but said the challenge lies in alignment and prioritisation. The country has the research base, industrial capacity and market size. What it now needs is a coordinated route from innovation to deployment.
There is a practical concern for cement manufacturers: how can existing plants be adapted for lower emissions without compromising reliability or commercial viability?
Sanagavarapu explained, “The reliability risk in calcined clay retrofit is definitely real, but it is almost always self-inflicted. The risk arises when a new process is added to an existing circuit without properly redesigning grinding and blending configurations.”
Existing cement plants, she explained, can take two broad routes. The first is external sourcing of calcined clay combined with mill optimisation. This requires lower capital investment and can potentially move in 12 to 18 months if other conditions are in place. It may reduce emissions by around 20 to 30 per cent. The second route is integrated calcination on site, which requires higher capital expenditure and longer lead times, but provides greater control over quality, supply and emissions reduction potential.
For Sanagavarapu, the principle is simple: low-carbon retrofits must be designed with intent. “Design it with an intent properly from the start. Start in the market conditions where the economics are already working,” she said.

Circularity: The overlooked advantage
According to Rathi, fly ash and slag are already well established in cement and construction (C&D), but construction and demolition waste remains underutilised. “C&D waste is a growing business opportunity which not many have taken up,” he said. India’s continuous construction and demolition activity creates huge volumes of waste, much of which contributes to air pollution, land degradation and material inefficiency. With the right processing and standards, this waste can be converted into useful construction products.
Rathi also pointed out that LC3 has a circular economy dimension that is often overlooked. It can use low-grade kaolin-rich clay left behind after high-grade clay is extracted for other applications. “LC3 is not only a low-carbon solution, but also a circular economy solution,” he said.
At the same time, he cautioned that LC3 in India is not yet cheap because it has not reached scale. Site-specific techno-commercial feasibility studies, supported jointly by development agencies and industry, could help companies assess whether LC3 production makes technical and financial sense at a given location.
Dr Purushottam added that India must address both low-carbon cement and construction waste together. “Both low-carbon cement and C&D waste go hand in hand. India does not have an option but to work on both,” she said.
Dr Aiyer called for policy shifts from both government and industry, including preferential purchasing of sustainable materials, minimum supplementary cementitious material requirements in public and public-private projects, and faster regulatory implementation. “If we can fast-track the regulatory standards and their implementation on the ground, that is the way to go,” he said.

From green ambition to green construction
Cement innovation is no longer only about chemistry. It is about systems. Low-carbon cement will scale only when technology, standards, procurement, finance, regulation, education and construction practice move together.
LC3 and other low-carbon technologies have shown promise. India has early commercial examples, strong research capability and growing market interest. But mainstream adoption will depend on whether demand can be created, regulators can be capacitated, standards can be embedded in procurement, and manufacturers can see a clear business case.
For a country building at India’s scale, the opportunity is enormous. Cement will continue to be central to infrastructure and urban development. The challenge now is to ensure that the cement used in India’s growth story carries a lower carbon burden.

Concrete

Cement Makers’ Margins To Fall Rs 50-75 Per Tonne Amid West Asia Conflict

Crisil Sees Margins Easing Despite Steady Demand

Published

3 weeks ago

July 29, 2026

admin

Crisil said operating margins of Indian cement manufacturers are expected to decline by Rs 50-75 per tonne (t) this fiscal to Rs 925-950 per t due to higher input costs triggered by the West Asia conflict. The analysis covered 18 cement companies accounting for nearly 90 per cent of India’s domestic cement capacity and noted margins had improved sharply to around Rs 1,000 per t in fiscal 2026.

Crisil noted that the reduction would be driven mainly by higher power and fuel costs, which account for about 30 per cent of total costs, as petcoke and imported coal prices have surged amid geopolitical uncertainties. Freight costs, which account for about a quarter of total costs, are also expected to remain elevated because of higher diesel prices. The impact on profitability is likely to be more pronounced in the first half of the fiscal year before easing commodity prices moderate cost pressures later.

The rating agency said steady domestic demand and strong balance sheets should keep credit profiles stable despite the moderation in margins. Green energy currently accounts for 35-40 per cent of the sector’s total electricity consumption and is expected to partly cushion higher energy costs. Operating cash flows are likely to remain resilient, supported by projected 6-7 per cent growth in cement demand this fiscal.

Crisil highlighted that demand growth will be driven primarily by infrastructure spending, which meets about one-third of sector consumption, and by a nearly 18 per cent higher budgetary allocation for core ministries that should support project execution. Weaker rural housing demand amid pressure on agricultural incomes from a possible below-average monsoon may be offset by improved urban housing demand supported by favourable home-loan rates and a strong pipeline of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Urban projects. Ongoing capacity additions will keep capital expenditure elevated and may lift net debt to EBITDA to between 1.2 and 1.4 times from around 1.0 time last fiscal, though ratios are expected to remain healthy.

Concrete

UltraTech Board Approves Rs 50 bn Fundraise Via NCDs

Company to issue half a million debentures for expansion plan

Published

3 weeks ago

July 28, 2026

admin

UltraTech Cement’s board of directors has approved raising Rs 5,000 crore (Rs 50 bn) through non?convertible debentures issued in rupees.

The finance committee cleared a proposal to issue up to 500,000 fully paid, unsecured, listed, rated, redeemable, rupee?denominated, non?convertible, non?cumulative debentures of Rs 1 lakh each (Rs 0.1 mn each), aggregating to the Rs 5,000 crore programme.

As of June 2026 the firm reported net debt of Rs 15,875 crore (Rs 158.75 bn) and said its capacity expansion projects under execution are backed by capital expenditure of about Rs 17,000 crore (Rs 170 bn) over the next two to two?and?a?half years.

UltraTech spent Rs 9,500 crore (Rs 95 bn) on capital expenditure in financial year 2026 and in April the group crossed 200.1 mn tonnes per annum of domestic grey cement capacity and 205.5 mn tonnes per annum of global capacity.

The chief financial officer indicated the company would take consolidated capacity beyond 242 mn tonnes per annum, with grey cement capacity reaching 212.7 mn tonnes per annum by the end of financial year 2027. He noted the net debt?to?earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation ratio stood at 0.87 times as of June 2026 and the company was confident of ending financial year 2027 with the ratio below one time.

In the first quarter of financial year 2026?27 UltraTech’s net profit attributable to owners rose 16.8 per cent year?on?year to Rs 2,599.3 crore (Rs 25.993 bn) and revenue from operations increased 15.9 per cent to Rs 24,648.20 crore (Rs 246.482 bn). The board approval is expected to complement internal cash flows as the company advances its expansion programme.

Concrete

Reimagining the Future

Published

4 weeks ago

July 21, 2026

admin

From LC3 and AI-driven kilns to RDF gasification, ICR explores the full breadth of technological innovation reshaping India’s cement industry. Low-carbon materials, digital manufacturing, alternative fuels and breakthrough concrete science are collectively advancing the sector’s transition from high-emission commodity producer toward a net-zero, infrastructure-ready future.

Innovation has become the defining force shaping the future of the cement industry. As the world’s second-largest cement producer, India is witnessing rising demand driven by infrastructure development, urbanisation, affordable housing, and industrial growth. At the same time, the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that cement production accounts for nearly 7 per cent to 8 per cent of global CO2 emissions, with clinker manufacturing contributing the largest share, making innovation an operational necessity. The industry is therefore investing heavily in low-carbon cement technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), digital manufacturing, alternative fuels, renewable energy and carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS). Innovations such as limestone calcined
clay cement (LC3), supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), AI-driven process optimisation and automated quality control are enabling manufacturers to produce more sustainable, efficient, and high-performance cement.
According to the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), achieving net-zero emissions will require a combination of material innovation, digital transformation, circular economy practices and collaborative research, making innovation central to the industry’s long-term competitiveness and India’s sustainable infrastructure growth.

Next-generation cement
The future of cement lies in reducing its dependence on clinker-the most carbon-intensive component of cement-through the adoption of low-carbon materials and advanced blended cement technologies. Products such as Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC), Portland Slag Cement (PSC), Portland Composite Cement (PCC), and LC3 are driving this shift by replacing clinker with SCMs like fly ash, GGBS, calcined clay and limestone.
According to GCCA, SCMs can replace 30 to 50 per cent of clinker, with some applications exceeding 70 per cent, significantly reducing carbon emissions without compromising strength or durability. These blended cements also improve concrete performance by enhancing durability, reducing permeability, and increasing resistance to chloride and sulphate attacks. As the availability of traditional SCMs declines with the decarbonisation of the power and steel sectors, the industry is increasingly exploring alternative materials and next-generation cement formulations to support long-term sustainability.
Shrivats Singhania, Deputy Managing Director, JK Lakshmi Cement, says, “Innovation is enabling the cement industry to address one of its most important challenges – producing more with fewer resources and lower emissions. Across the value chain, manufacturers are deploying technologies that simultaneously improve operational efficiency and advance sustainability goals. For example, greater adoption of alternative fuels, waste heat recovery systems, renewable energy, and digital process controls is helping reduce energy consumption and optimise resource utilisation. Data-driven manufacturing allows plants to monitor operations in real time, improve equipment reliability, minimise downtime, and reduce wastage, resulting in both environmental and economic benefits.”
“Meaningful progress is also being achieved through material innovation. The growing use of blended cements and next-generation products such as LC3 reduces dependence on clinker, the most carbon-intensive component of cement production, thereby lowering embodied carbon without compromising performance,” he adds.
Among emerging technologies, LC3 has gained global recognition as one of the most promising low-carbon cement innovations. In a standard formulation, LC3 comprises approximately 50 per cent clinker, 30 per cent calcined clay, 15 per cent limestone, and 5 per cent gypsum. LC3 can reduce CO2 emissions by up to 40 per cent compared with Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) while delivering comparable strength and enhanced durability. Its reliance on abundant, locally available raw materials, rather than industrial by-products, makes it highly scalable and well suited to countries like India.
According to the LC3 Project, nearly 75 per cent of cement plants worldwide could adopt LC3 using existing manufacturing infrastructure, potentially reducing global CO2 emissions by over 400 million tonnes annually, if adopted at scale globally. India’s introduction of BIS standard IS 18189:2023 for LC3, coupled with its adoption in projects such as the Noida International Airport, marks a step toward commercial implementation. As demand for sustainable construction grows, LC3 is poised to become a cornerstone of low-carbon infrastructure development.

Making of a smart cement plant
The modern cement plant is rapidly evolving into a digitally connected, AI-enabled manufacturing ecosystem where data drives every aspect of production – from raw material proportioning and kiln operations to quality control, maintenance and energy management.
According to IEA, digital technologies can improve energy efficiency in heavy industries by 10 per cent to 20 per cent. Advanced process control systems in cement plants have demonstrated the potential to reduce thermal energy consumption by 3 to 5 per cent, lower electricity consumption by 2 to 10 per cent, and improve kiln throughput and clinker quality. AI-powered predictive maintenance further helps reduce unplanned equipment downtime by 30 to 50 per cent and extend equipment life by continuously analysing sensor data to detect failures before
they occur.
Jignesh Kundaria, Director and CEO, Fornnax Technology, says, “AFR is no longer viewed solely as a sustainability initiative. It has become a strategic business priority for cement manufacturers. Rising fuel costs, stricter environmental regulations, and growing pressure to reduce dependence on conventional fuels are accelerating AFR adoption across the industry. However, the success of an AFR project depends heavily on how effectively waste is processed before it reaches the kiln. Poor preprocessing can negatively impact kiln performance, fuel efficiency, and emission control systems. Inconsistent fuel
quality often forces operators to make frequent adjustments, reducing throughput and increasing energy consumption.”
Dr Kapil Kukreja, General Manager, NCCBM, says, “Variations in composition, particle size, and calorific value can lead to inconsistent combustion behaviour resulting in fluctuating heat release patterns. These fluctuations can affect process stability, temperature control and clinker quality. Additionally, incomplete combustion of RDF particles can result in increased emissions, higher unburnt carbon content, and operational difficulties within the calciner system. Higher ash and inert content of RDF can dilute the clinker quality and reduce calciner efficiency.”
Meanwhile, digital twins are allowing manufacturers to simulate entire production processes, optimise kiln performance, evaluate process changes virtually, and reduce operational risks before implementation. Automated Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS), coupled with online and offline XRF and XRD analysers, are delivering real-time monitoring of clinker chemistry and mineralogy, ensuring tighter quality control, lower clinker variability and more consistent cement performance.
Dr Prateek Sharma, Group Project Manager, NCCBM, explains, “Chlorides and alkalis present in RDF can lead to excess buildup and blockages in the kiln and calciner increasing the downtime of cement plants. Hence, issues with direct utilisation of RDF establishes the need for fuel conditioning and alternative utilisation approaches that can maximise the energy potential of RDF while minimising adverse impacts on plant operation. RDF gasification emerges as an efficient tool for converting solid RDF into syngas which can be used as a fuel with improved characteristics.”
Digitalisation and intelligent manufacturing will be among the most critical enablers of achieving the cement industry’s net-zero ambitions by improving operational efficiency while simultaneously reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, confirms a GCCA report.

From research to reality
While the cement industry has made remarkable progress in developing breakthrough technologies, the transition from laboratory research to large-scale commercial deployment remains one of its greatest challenges. The successful adoption of innovations such as LC3), CCUS, advanced alternative fuels, green hydrogen and novel SCMs depend not only on technical feasibility but also on economic viability, regulatory support, raw material availability, and market acceptance.
Veerendra Jamdade, CEO and Founder, Vritti Solutions, states, “The cement industry has a market that is constantly in flux, due to factors such as infrastructure investment, seasonality of demand, fuel costs, building activity by region and general economic cycles; therefore, having accurate forecasts is very important in this type of market. Traditional ERP systems are primarily data repositories with limited analytic functionality; thus, they capture transactional and operational information but generally lack advanced analytical capabilities for converting captured data into actionable information. This
affects everything from demand forecasting and inventory planning through procurement and production scheduling.”
According to IEA, technologies that are still at the demonstration or early commercial stage-including CCUS and next-generation low-carbon binders-are expected to contribute nearly 40 per cent of the emissions reductions required for the global cement sector to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, underscoring the importance of accelerating their scale-up. This requires robust R&D ecosystems, stronger collaboration between cement manufacturers, research institutions, technology providers,
equipment suppliers, and policymakers, as well as supportive standards and financial incentives to reduce investment risks.
Ashutosh Pandita, Director – Head, Cement Business, TKIL Industries, elaborates, “The cement industry’s most transformative innovation today is the increased use of alternative fuels and raw materials (AFR), supported by advanced feeding systems and process technologies that are driving both operational efficiency and decarbonisation. Looking ahead, oxyfuel combustion and carbon capture technologies remain underappreciated but hold immense potential for enabling deep reductions in carbon emissions and accelerating the industry’s journey towards net-zero production. By 2030, cement manufacturing is expected to become significantly more sustainable, energy-efficient, and technology-driven, with widespread adoption of AFR, low-clinker cement technologies, greater digitalisation and automation, and the early commercial deployment of carbon capture solutions, all supported by stronger industry collaboration and a shared commitment to achieving long-term sustainability goals.”
In India, organisations such as the National Council for Cement and Building Materials (NCCBM), leading academic institutions, and major cement companies are working together to develop and validate emerging technologies, while the introduction of standards such as IS 18189:2023 for Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) marks a significant step towards commercial adoption. However, challenges such as high capital investment, long validation cycles, limited infrastructure for technologies like CCUS, fluctuating availability of alternative raw materials, and customer acceptance continue to slow implementation. Bridging the gap between research and commercial reality will therefore require sustained investment in innovation, knowledge-sharing, pilot projects, policy support, and industry-wide collaboration to ensure that promising technologies evolve into scalable, economically viable solutions capable of transforming the future of cement manufacturing.

Creating a green future
Clinker production will increasingly rely on low-carbon technologies such as LC3, high-volume SCMs, AFR, renewable energy, waste heat recovery, and eventually CCUS, enabling manufacturers to significantly reduce their environmental footprint.
Achieving net-zero concrete by 2050 will require a combination of clinker substitution (around 37 per cent of cumulative CO2 reductions), carbon capture technologies (approximately 36 per cent), and improvements in thermal efficiency, renewable energy, and circular economy practices.
Industry Expert SA Khadilkar comments, “Customer requirements are a key driver of innovation in the cement industry, influencing product development, process improvements, sustainability initiatives, and digital solutions. Innovation is most effective when it addresses real market needs, particularly in areas such as performance, durability, and application-specific requirements. Around a decade ago, ACC and Ambuja Cements (now Adani Cement) recognised this shift and introduced performance-oriented blended cement brands with enhanced durability, reduced water penetration, and OPC-like properties. Their success encouraged other major cement manufacturers to develop specialised cement brands with unique performance characteristics, demonstrating how product innovation has evolved to meet changing customer expectations.”
“Ultimately, customer expectations have transformed innovation from a technology-driven exercise into a market-driven strategy, ensuring that new developments create measurable value across the construction value chain,” he adds.
India is expected to add nearly 500 million square metres of urban built-up area by 2030, driving sustained demand for greener, more durable, and higher-performing construction materials, according to NITI Aayog. Meeting this demand will require cement manufacturers to evolve from commodity producers into integrated providers of sustainable building solutions, supported by data-driven manufacturing, collaborative R&D, customer-centric product innovation, and circular resource management. The cement plant of tomorrow will therefore be defined not only by its production capacity but also by its ability to manufacture smarter, cleaner, and more sustainable construction materials that support India’s ambitious infrastructure and climate goals.

Conclusion
The path ahead is clear in its direction, if not yet in its pace. India’s position as the world’s second-largest cement producer, combined with its infrastructure ambitions and its 2070 net-zero commitment, makes this transition both urgent
and consequential.
What this article has made evident is that no single technology will carry the industry to net zero. LC3 addresses clinker dependency. Digital manufacturing addresses efficiency and waste. Alternative fuels address fossil fuel dependence. CCUS addresses the residual process emissions that no other lever can reach. Each is necessary. None is sufficient alone. The industry’s task is to advance all of them simultaneously, at a pace that matches the scale of the challenge.
The plants that will build tomorrow’s highways, airports and homes will need to do so with a fraction of today’s carbon footprint.

Innovations in cement and concrete

Carbon mineralisation in concrete: A 2026 peer-reviewed study in the Journal of the American Ceramic Society by MIT’s Masic Lab and CarbonCure Technologies used in-situ Raman microspectroscopy to show that CO2 injected during cement mixing triggers a three-stage hydration sequence, producing a more uniform microstructure with approximately 13 per cent higher early strength while permanently sequestering carbon within the concrete matrix.

Source: www.carboncure.com

Zero-clinker geopolymer blocks: Theseus Development manufactures geopolymer blocks using upcycled aluminosilicate waste from quarries and mines through an inorganic polymerisation process, achieving up to 80 per cent lower embodied carbon compared to conventional cement blocks. An interlocking block design reduces mortar requirements, lowering construction costs while eliminating clinker entirely from the production process.

Source: www.rmi.org

3D-printed basalt fibre grids: Austrian startup Fiber Elements, founded in 2023, uses robotically wound continuous basalt fibres arranged into three-dimensional reinforcement grids that replace steel in concrete structures. The resulting composites are three times stronger than steel, weigh two-thirds less, resist corrosion entirely and reduce CO2 emissions by up to 70 per cent compared to conventional steel-reinforced concrete.

Source: www.eitmanufacturing.eu

Self-healing concrete: Dutch company Basilisk leads commercial deployment of bacteria-based self-healing concrete, with licensed production now active in Japan and a highway viaduct pilot planned for 2026. Dormant Bacillus bacteria embedded in the mix activate upon crack formation, metabolising nutrients to precipitate calcium carbonate that autonomously seals fractures. The global self-healing concrete market is projected to grow significantly through 2031, driven by green building mandates and infrastructure agencies targeting lower maintenance costs and extended structural life.

Sources: www.thelegaljournalontechnology.com and www.mordorintelligence.com