Connect with us

Concrete

Treated Wastewater in Construction

Published

on

Shares

Decentralised wastewater treatment is paving the way for sustainable construction and water conservation in India. Onkar Tiwari along with Dr Kapil Kukreja, Dr Sanjay Mundra, and Dr LP Singh, National Council for Cement and Building Materials (NCCBM), Ballabgarh, discuss the enabling of on-site reuse of treated water, an eco-friendly alternative to groundwater extraction.

Wastewater treatment has been an area of great interest for many decades due to intermixed pollutants that cause harmful effects on the water bodies. However, with rapid industrialisation and population growth, water quality of conventionally treated effluents is becoming progressively worse. Water quality analysis of treated water from different wastewater treatment facilities reveals that various inorganic as well as organic pollutants still exist in treated streams. However, decentralised modular wastewater treatment systems are one of the best approaches to deal with this problem. This article highlights the application of treating waste water for construction purposes and also discusses the advantages of decentralised/modular treatment systems over centralised treatment systems in India, recent advancements, challenges and future perspectives of indigenous sewage treatment plants (STP), using the latest technology for wastewater treatment systems.

Various wastewater studies suggest that the actual reuse of treated wastewater in India is limited to ~20-30 per cent. However, this wastewater reclamation will be sufficient for the growing need for development in the next 10 years. The potential financial savings from this could amount to a few thousand crores, a promising figure that underscores the potential of wastewater reuse and the significant economic benefits it can bring. This promising financial aspect should still give a sense of optimism about the potential of wastewater reuse in the construction industry.
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) and the Honourable Supreme Court in India do not allow groundwater to be used as construction water, the treated water requirement per IS 3025 and IS 456 is the most easily achievable target compared to Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) norms and NGT directives.

The primary reasons for not reusing treated wastewater in India include:
a. Almost all our rivers are filled with untreated wastewater.
b. Loss of organic matter, which can be helpful in creating fresh soil; hence, fertile land is reclaimed in acres every year.
c. Wastewater treatment plants are built at the end of the sewer infrastructure, as most sewage water flows are gravity-driven. So, wastewater treatment plants are at the lowest point of the watershed, usually beside the river and sea.
d. In the last 30 years, standards were not focused on reuses, so the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) of 30, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) of 100, and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) of 100 were unsuitable for human touch; hence, no water use was practised or minimum reuse was under the trend.
e. Even if groundwater is precious for use in cement production and grass irrigation, the lack of regulations on groundwater use has facilitated the large-scale use of groundwater for parks and gardens to date.
f. The ‘ecology of commerce’ is a term that describes the interconnected relationship between various industries and their water usage, has not been explored holistically. For example, multiple industries use high amounts of water in any industrial estate. After one uses the water, it is drained in a public utility drain. Other sectors could have used that water with minimum treatment cost and capacity.
g. Most seasonal and small tributaries have been converted into urban drains due to sewage line connections, so various parks use groundwater instead of tributary or treated water.

Areas of concern in centralised wastewater treatment
Centralised wastewater treatment may be the solution for conserving the waste, but it has many challenges:

  • Large space requirements
  • Bad smell near the treatment plants
  • High energy requirement in energy-stressed habitation
  • No aesthetic focus in any of the wastewater treatment plants
  • No proper guidelines for decentralised wastewater treatment plants.
  • No online and live information for the quality and quantity of water treated is available
  • Due to long drainage, gravity-fed systems require the construction of pumping and lift stations, which are costly capital/maintenance structures
  • Large infrastructure cost of redistribution
  • Very long setup time for plant

Decentralised wastewater treatment
The ‘quantum possibility of decentralised wastewater treatment’ is a concept that refers to the significant potential of decentralised treatment to solve major challenges our country faces. It is a promising solution that could pave the way for sustainable water management practices.
If someone builds a decentralised sewage treatment plant and treats its wastewater to comply with CPCB and State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) norms, the treated water quality will be suitable to use in the construction sector as per applicable Indian Standards (IS) codes.

 

Using on-site treated wastewater for construction is highly recommended, and organisations opting for the same can save money and achieve higher sustainability. These plants can be installed at the site in 1-2 weeks only, and they are operable with solar energy as well, so even if the electrical connections are not available at the site, the decentralised waste water treatment plant will keep generating good water. This emphasis on decentralisation
should install a sense of hope for the future of wastewater management, as it presents a viable and sustainable solution.
Decentralised wastewater treatment plants offer several benefits that make them a sustainable and efficient alternative to centralised systems:

  • Cost-effectiveness: These systems reduce the need for extensive piping and pumping infrastructure, leading to lower capital and operational costs.
  • Environmental sustainability: By treating wastewater closer to its source as per table 1 shows its enhanced sustainability index.
  • Faster implementation: These systems can be implemented more quickly than centralised
    plants, especially in areas with limited infrastructure decentralised systems minimise energy use
    and promote water reuse, contributing to environmental conservation.
  • Flexibility and scalability: They can be tailored to meet the needs of small communities or
    specific locations, making them adaptable to various settings.
  • Resilience: Decentralised systems are less vulnerable to large-scale failures, ensuring continued operation during disasters or infrastructure breakdowns.

Conclusion
The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds can be used to treat a sizeable nearby drain, and that treated water can be provided to nearby farmers, which will increase the industry-society connection
Groundwater use for construction purposes is banned. Most of the Urban Local Bodies (ULB) have banned groundwater use for construction. Still, the public has not been given options and facilities for the alternative of the same and treated wastewater availability, if each pincode again saves a massive amount of groundwater being illegally used.
Under the clean air programme, various ULBs use sprinklers on roads and tree washing, for which treated drinking water from groundwater is used on a large scale; again, treated wastewater can be used.
Almost every urban space, including state roads and highways, has vegetation beside the road or on the road’s median; treated wastewater again will help availability near the point of use and have a good volume of groundwater.

About the authors:

Onkar Tiwari is a Managing Director of Biomimicry Technologies, with 25 years of experience in the field of environment and waste water treatment.

Dr Kapil Kukreja is the General Manager at NCB, with 21 years of experience in R&D and cement Industry, He earned his PhD from BITS Pilani and is at present heading the NCB Incubation Centre.

Dr Sanjay Mundra is the General Manager at NCB, with 26 years experience in R&D and cement, He has a PhD from MNIT Jaipur.

Dr L P Singh is the Director General of NCB. He is a profound scientist/researcher with a distinguished career spanning over 30 years in R&D, with a PhD (1996) in Physical Chemistry from the University of Roorkee (now IIT Roorkee).

Concrete

Nuvoco Vistas Reports Record Q2 EBITDA, Expands Capacity to 35 MTPA

Cement Major Nuvoco Posts Rs 3.71 bn EBITDA in Q2 FY26

Published

on

By

Shares

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd., one of India’s leading building materials companies, has reported its highest-ever second-quarter consolidated EBITDA of Rs 3.71 billion for Q2 FY26, reflecting an 8% year-on-year revenue growth to Rs 24.58 billion. Cement sales volume stood at 4.3 MMT during the quarter, driven by robust demand and a rising share of premium products, which reached an all-time high of 44%.

The company continued its deleveraging journey, reducing like-to-like net debt by Rs 10.09 billion year-on-year to Rs 34.92 billion. Commenting on the performance, Jayakumar Krishnaswamy, Managing Director, said, “Despite macro headwinds, disciplined execution and focus on premiumisation helped us achieve record performance. We remain confident in our structural growth trajectory.”

Nuvoco’s capacity expansion plans remain on track, with refurbishment of the Vadraj Cement facility progressing towards operationalisation by Q3 FY27. In addition, the company’s 4 MTPA phased expansion in eastern India, expected between December 2025 and March 2027, will raise its total cement capacity to 35 MTPA by FY27.

Reinforcing its sustainability credentials, Nuvoco continues to lead the sector with one of the lowest carbon emission intensities at 453.8 kg CO? per tonne of cementitious material.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Jindal Stainless to Invest $150 Mn in Odisha Metal Recovery Plant

New Jajpur facility to double metal recovery capacity and cut emissions

Published

on

By

Shares

Jindal Stainless Limited has announced an investment of $150 million to build and operate a new wet milling plant in Jajpur, Odisha, aimed at doubling its capacity to recover metal from industrial waste. The project is being developed in partnership with Harsco Environmental under a 15-year agreement.

The facility will enable the recovery of valuable metals from slag and other waste materials, significantly improving resource efficiency and reducing environmental impact. The initiative aligns with Jindal Stainless’s sustainability roadmap, which focuses on circular economy practices and low-carbon operations.

In financial year 2025, the company reduced its carbon footprint by about 14 per cent through key decarbonisation initiatives, including commissioning India’s first green hydrogen plant for stainless steel production and setting up the country’s largest captive solar energy plant within a single industrial campus in Odisha.

Shares of Jindal Stainless rose 1.8 per cent to Rs 789.4 per share following the announcement, extending a 5 per cent gain over the past month.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Vedanta gets CCI Approval for Rs 17,000 MnJaiprakash buyout

Acquisition marks Vedanta’s expansion into cement, real estate, and infra

Published

on

By

Shares

Vedanta Limited has received approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to acquire Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) for approximately Rs 17,000 million under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) process. The move marks Vedanta’s strategic expansion beyond its core mining and metals portfolio into cement, real estate, and infrastructure sectors.

Once the flagship of the Jaypee Group, JAL has faced severe financial distress with creditors’ claims exceeding Rs 59,000 million. Vedanta emerged as the preferred bidder in a competitive auction, outbidding the Adani Group with an overall offer of Rs 17,000 million, equivalent to Rs 12,505 million in net present value terms. The payment structure involves an upfront settlement of around Rs 3,800 million, followed by annual instalments of Rs 2,500–3,000 million over five years.

The National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (NARCL), which acquired the group’s stressed loans from a State Bank of India-led consortium, now leads the creditor committee. Lenders are expected to take a haircut of around 71 per cent based on Vedanta’s offer. Despite approvals for other bidders, Vedanta’s proposal stood out as the most viable resolution plan, paving the way for the company’s diversification into new business verticals.

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds