Connect with us

Concrete

Technology plays a vital role in utilising alternative materials

Published

on

Shares

Rajpal Singh Shekhawat, Senior General Manager (Production and QC),JK Lakshmi Cement, stresses on the importance of the quality of alternative raw materials in order to maintain the quality of the output.

What are the core raw materials used in the production of cement?
The first step to manufacturing cement is manufacturing the clinker. The principle raw material required to make clinker is cement grade limestone. Other raw material requirements depend upon the quality of limestone and these could be iron ores like red ochre, blue dust, laterite, alumina ores like bauxite, China clay and siliceous materials like Marl and silica sand. As far as cement is concerned for Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), clinker and
gypsum are used, for Pozzolana Portland Cement (PPC) clinker, gypsum and fly ash are used and for Portland Slag Cement (PSC) clinker, gypsum and slag are used.

What are the alternative raw materials that can be used in the production of cement? How does that impact the process of production?
Waste from the aluminium industry like red mud, waste from the marble industry like marble slurry and marble khanda, waste from the chemical industry like chemical sludge and ETP sludge, waste from the paper industry like paper sludge can be used in clinker manufacturing. For the cement manufacturing process, waste from chemical industry like chemical gypsum, waste from ceramic industry like mould gypsum, waste from zinc industry like jarosite and waste from the salt industry like marine gypsum can be used.
However, the quantity of alternative material or waste to be utilised depends a lot upon the quality of limestone and quality of other raw materials used in cement grinding. It varies from plant to plant and the quality of these alternative materials varies from source to source.

Can cement maintain its quality standard with inclusion of supplementary raw materials as against limestone?
Certainly, the quality of cement can be maintained by including these supplementary raw materials, however, the raw material proportion must be tweaked according to the quality of alternative raw material and the cost benefit analysis.

Explain the impact on carbon emission of the production unit when alternative raw materials are used in various proportions.
Carbon emission in cement manufacturing is mainly because of limestone, fuel burning, and electrical energy consumption. Majority of the CO2 emission in cement industry is from the decomposition of calcium carbonate and if we replace limestone by alternative raw material which contains calcium in any form other than carbonate, carbon emission can be reduced. For example, if we replace 1 per cent of CaO by other raw materials then around 5 kg CO2/ MT of clinker will be reduced.

How can the cost of production be reduced by using alternative or supplementary raw materials in cement production?
Cost of production depends on the plant location, limestone and raw material quality. The source of alternative raw materials for some plants are significant and in some instances because of high logistic cost economics do not work out. For example, if a cement plant is located near the industry where chemical gypsum is generated, there will be a significant gain to that particular cement plant.

What are the major challenges in using other cementitious materials?
Using alternative materials comes with their own set of challenges. Some of the challenges associated with them are high moisture content, material flowability, consistency in the material quality, chloride and sulphur content.

What role does technology play in deciding which materials can be used and incorporating them in the production process?
Certainly, technology plays a vital role in utilising alternative material, for example if drying technology is available at the plant like drier than even high moisture material can be used and handled otherwise only selected material with less moisture content are allowed.
Likewise in case of alternative fuel, if pre-processing facilities like separation of organic and combustion solid fraction, screening and pre-shredding is available then MSW can be directly used. However, when the pre-processing and shredding facility is not available at the plant then the plant requires shredded RDF <80 mm in case of in-line calciner and <40-50 mm in case of separate line calciner. Regarding utilisation of high chloride and high sulphur material if akali/chloride by-pass is installed then even high chloride/sulphur can be accepted based on the cost benefit analysis otherwise chloride input is to be restricted to 200-300gm/tonne of clinker.

Does your organisation manufacture a variant of cement made from alternative raw materials? Tell us more about its performance and use.
Yes, we are utilising various alternative raw materials like chemical gypsum, mould gypsum, ETP and phosphate sludges. Talking about chemical gypsum, its purity is more than natural gypsum. The performance of concrete made by the cement by utilising partial replacement of chemical gypsum is more cohesive than the cement made from natural gypsum. Moreover, the cement made by utilising chemical gypsum improves the workability of cement. Likewise, we utilise various alternative fuels at our premises and their consumption is being optimised looking into process and quality.
By utilising various alternative raw materials and fuels we are saving around 25 kg CO2/Mt of clinker and working on alternative materials and fuels that can reduce carbon footprints further.

How do you foresee future of production?
The per capita capital cement consumption in India is still much lower than the world average. Therefore, there is a huge potential for the industry to grow. There has been a continuous rise in the cost of fuel post covid and post the Russia-Ukraine engagement and still rising.
Owing to this, there is pressure on the industry to maintain the margins. Although, Indian cement industry is co-processing various alternative fuels and alternative raw materials to reduce its carbon footprint, it will in the future also put its focus on utilising alternative materials and fuels to bring down the cost of production.

-Kanika Mathur

Concrete

Nuvoco Vistas Reports Record Q2 EBITDA, Expands Capacity to 35 MTPA

Cement Major Nuvoco Posts Rs 3.71 bn EBITDA in Q2 FY26

Published

on

By

Shares



Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd., one of India’s leading building materials companies, has reported its highest-ever second-quarter consolidated EBITDA of Rs 3.71 billion for Q2 FY26, reflecting an 8% year-on-year revenue growth to Rs 24.58 billion. Cement sales volume stood at 4.3 MMT during the quarter, driven by robust demand and a rising share of premium products, which reached an all-time high of 44%.

The company continued its deleveraging journey, reducing like-to-like net debt by Rs 10.09 billion year-on-year to Rs 34.92 billion. Commenting on the performance, Jayakumar Krishnaswamy, Managing Director, said, “Despite macro headwinds, disciplined execution and focus on premiumisation helped us achieve record performance. We remain confident in our structural growth trajectory.”

Nuvoco’s capacity expansion plans remain on track, with refurbishment of the Vadraj Cement facility progressing towards operationalisation by Q3 FY27. In addition, the company’s 4 MTPA phased expansion in eastern India, expected between December 2025 and March 2027, will raise its total cement capacity to 35 MTPA by FY27.

Reinforcing its sustainability credentials, Nuvoco continues to lead the sector with one of the lowest carbon emission intensities at 453.8 kg CO? per tonne of cementitious material.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Jindal Stainless to Invest $150 Mn in Odisha Metal Recovery Plant

New Jajpur facility to double metal recovery capacity and cut emissions

Published

on

By

Shares



Jindal Stainless Limited has announced an investment of $150 million to build and operate a new wet milling plant in Jajpur, Odisha, aimed at doubling its capacity to recover metal from industrial waste. The project is being developed in partnership with Harsco Environmental under a 15-year agreement.

The facility will enable the recovery of valuable metals from slag and other waste materials, significantly improving resource efficiency and reducing environmental impact. The initiative aligns with Jindal Stainless’s sustainability roadmap, which focuses on circular economy practices and low-carbon operations.

In financial year 2025, the company reduced its carbon footprint by about 14 per cent through key decarbonisation initiatives, including commissioning India’s first green hydrogen plant for stainless steel production and setting up the country’s largest captive solar energy plant within a single industrial campus in Odisha.

Shares of Jindal Stainless rose 1.8 per cent to Rs 789.4 per share following the announcement, extending a 5 per cent gain over the past month.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Vedanta gets CCI Approval for Rs 17,000 MnJaiprakash buyout

Acquisition marks Vedanta’s expansion into cement, real estate, and infra

Published

on

By

Shares



Vedanta Limited has received approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to acquire Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) for approximately Rs 17,000 million under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) process. The move marks Vedanta’s strategic expansion beyond its core mining and metals portfolio into cement, real estate, and infrastructure sectors.

Once the flagship of the Jaypee Group, JAL has faced severe financial distress with creditors’ claims exceeding Rs 59,000 million. Vedanta emerged as the preferred bidder in a competitive auction, outbidding the Adani Group with an overall offer of Rs 17,000 million, equivalent to Rs 12,505 million in net present value terms. The payment structure involves an upfront settlement of around Rs 3,800 million, followed by annual instalments of Rs 2,500–3,000 million over five years.

The National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (NARCL), which acquired the group’s stressed loans from a State Bank of India-led consortium, now leads the creditor committee. Lenders are expected to take a haircut of around 71 per cent based on Vedanta’s offer. Despite approvals for other bidders, Vedanta’s proposal stood out as the most viable resolution plan, paving the way for the company’s diversification into new business verticals.

Continue Reading

Trending News