Connect with us

Concrete

Concrete Temperature

Published

on

Shares

RUPESH KUMAR explains why it is important to control concrete temperature and how it can be done.
With mega structures coming up every?where using high-grade concrete, the control of concrete temperature is become a matter of frequent discu?ssion among civil engineers.

The concern
Green concrete, the nascent stage of concrete hardening, requires a lot of care to mature as good concrete. Concrete is weak in tension bearing; more so, in the initial stage of hardening. Its vulnerability becomes more critical when there are tensile forces induced owing to the hardening process. Being an exothermic reaction, heat is generated during the process; this causes thermal differential and stress that act as a tensile force and cause cracks.

In many cases, cracks developed at the initial stages do not heal and remain or widen further as the concrete shrinks during further hardening. This leads to a situation where structural stability, integrity and durability begin to get compromised. The following observations can be made in the early days of concrete, primarily in the first week:

  • Concrete matures with time and temperature.
  • Strength comes with maturity.
  • In seven days, almost 2/3 of 28 days strength gain for OPC cement-based concrete is expected, though this can vary according to the design mix.
  • The exothermic chemical reaction is most active during this period.
  • Thermal gain is achieved to its maximum during this period; concrete core temperature starts declining after reaching its peak in most cases.
  • Core temperature rise causes thermal differential and stress in concrete.
  • The higher the temperature, faster the maturity. But early higher temperature leads to a greater tendency to crack internally, owing to higher thermal stress. Increasing temperature in the early days has shown more strength on the seventh day and less on day 28 compared to standard maturity of concrete on day seven and 28 respectively, owing to thermal micro-cracking.
  • Concrete plastic shrinkage and initial shrinkage are more dominant during this period and slow down with time. Late shrinkage can continue for many months but the effect is not so significant as the concrete strength is able to counteract the stress of late shrinkage in most cases.
  • Cracks developed during the initial stage owing to plastic shrinkage may not heal automatically in further maturity. On the contrary, at times the crack increases in width, depth or both with time, owing to shrinkage stress acting as a localised tensile force.
  • Cracks develop when the tensile stress increases more than the tensile bearing capacity of the concrete.
  • If the concrete does not gain sufficient strength during the peak concrete temperature, and specifically during higher thermal differential, there is higher likelihood of cracking.
  • The peak temperature of concrete and the thermal differential depends on the green concrete temperature as well as the ambient temperature along with shuttering (temporary formwork) condition.
  • The heat gain in the concrete for a given design mix is the same; thus, the green concrete has a direct effect on the heat gain and rise in concrete core temperature. The higher the green concrete temperature, higher the core peak temperature, and vice versa.
  • The thermal differential causes the stress in the concrete and core to the surface temperature of the concrete must be kept in controlled condition to control the differential. However, the peak temperature of the core beyond a limit may cause other long-term effects like DEF (delayed ettringite formation; a matter yet to be ascertained codally) and needs to be addressed. In Indian tropical conditions, DEF is not expected to be of serious concern if the temperature is taken care of to limit peak temperature below 70?and pozzolanic material is used in the mix. However, thermal differential of concrete must be an area of focus for durable concrete.

Green concrete temperature
The temperature control limits of green concrete are specified in various codes and they all vary. There are references for RCC green concrete temperature for below 40?, up to 38? up to 32?, up to 30? and up to 25? in various codes, including BIS, BS and ASTM.

With higher grades of concrete, the maximum allowable core temperature restrictions are of higher consideration, which restrict the green concrete temperature less than what is allowed in the codes.

To restrict the peak temperature, the green concrete temperature is asked to be reduced. In such a specific scenario, a holistic approach should be taken to define the green concrete temperature as lowering the temperature is a costly affair – although it is not intended to compromise the strength and durability of the concrete. Care should be taken as green concrete temperature control requires a broader approach than simply lowering the temperature during production; it should first be ascertained whether it is really required. It is more prudent to have higher temperature rather than more thermal differential. Also, the lower temperature should be sustained – not less at any one stage of the concrete production, transportation, placement and construction. Further, thermal consideration of concrete is more important for mass concrete than smaller sections.

Way to set concrete temperature limit
To understand the thermal consideration for a given concrete in a project, a preliminary test should be done to arrive at the initial data. Except generally established limits, at present, the codes have not established the procedure for review and analysis of concrete temperature acceptance for a given scenario. A procedure with the action points mentioned below can be used to logically arrive at a calculation analysis and mock-up review to arrive at the concrete temperature acceptance for the given scenario. Some important questions to ask during calculation analysis and mock-up testing are:

How does the concrete temperature rise with time and when the peak temperature is reached for a given mix? For this, a thermal probe can be inserted before placing the concrete and recoding can be done using a thermal data logger. Alternatively, manual set-up and reading can be done, but manual recoding is tedious. The data can be recorded or plotted and analysed.

What is the design calculation with consideration of thermal stress and the crack width allowed as per the design? The data can be obtained from the design calculation sheet or designer.

How is the reinforcement as per the design of the structure and is it able to take the stress developed in the concrete owing to thermal stress? The designer can confirm this and reinforcement adequacy for taking additional thermal stress can be checked considering the crack width limitation as per the design calculation.

How is the maturity of concrete and subsequently the strength of concrete with respect to time? The data can be obtained by taking additional sufficient concrete samples and keeping them under standard testing condition. Curing tank temperature can be taken if the temperature is not being maintained in the curing tank. Testing of concrete sampling shall be done as per testing the procedure at various durations.

Is there any crack observed in the mock up and is there is any crack owing to thermal stress and not plastic shrinkage? To avoid plastic shrinkage, the mock shall preferably be for an adiabatic condition for unreinforced, 1 cu m of mass or miniature replica of the actual structure.

Close observation is required to check crack development; if required, a core can be taken to check the inside of the concrete mass. Normally, thermal stress if developed and causing a crack inside, will reflect up to the surface as the surface to core thermal differential is expected to be more than the thermal differential of the core to the other inner part of concrete. Based on a visual examination, the cracks can be checked.

Now, based on the data mentioned above, one can calculate the estimated concrete temperature and acceptable thermal differential. It can also be analysed whether the concrete is expected to crack beyond the design calculation for the given reinforcement design and estimated concrete peak temperature in the project ambient temperature, and more so for the thermal differential. Then, verification can be done by examining the mock-up concrete.

Thus, one can ascertain whether concrete can sustain the expected peak temperature and thermal differential for a given design mix with reinforcement as per design and ambient condition during construction. In case of non-reinforced concrete (PCC-based structure), reinforcement stress bearing will not be present and the concrete would be able to sustain only as much stress as the maturity of concrete will allow.

About the author
Rupesh Kumar
is a Quality Manager and Concrete Technologist with 18 years of experience working in mega projects in India and abroad. He has dealt with more than 2.5 million cu m of concrete in projects of RMC, hospital, factories, stadium, metros, airports and statue.

This artical was first published in Construction World magazine

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Concrete

Cement Prices Likely To Rise As Petcoke Costs Increase

Nuvama warns input costs may lift prices by early April 2026

Published

on

By

Shares

A report by Nuvama Wealth Management said cement prices in India could rise by the end of March or early April 2026 as producers face higher input costs linked to crude oil. The report identified rising petroleum coke and packaging material costs as principal drivers of upward pressure on production expenses. Petroleum coke, a fuel used in cement manufacturing, rose by about 13 per tonne (t) in US dollar terms in February 2026, a change that could be passed on to buyers. Producers may adjust prices later in the quarter to protect margins.

Cement demand remained stable during February and March 2026, supported by ongoing construction and infrastructure activity, and earlier price increases on non-trade sales were largely reversed by the end of February. Retail prices remained broadly steady through March in most regions. The persistence of demand may allow firms to manage price adjustments rather than apply uniform increases. Market responses will vary by region and logistical cost pressures.

Nuvama said that stock performance of cement companies will likely be influenced by the path of cement prices and petroleum coke costs in the coming weeks. Rising input costs including crude linked fuels and packaging may squeeze profit margins and prompt firms to monitor pricing and demand closely. The balance between input inflation and end demand will determine whether companies absorb costs or transfer them to customers. Analysts will watch forthcoming quarterly results for evidence of margin pressure or successful cost pass through.

Government capital expenditure showed moderation, with overall capex declining 24 per cent year-on-year to around Rs 2 trillion (Rs 2 tn) in January 2026 and cumulative capex from April 2025 to January 2026 at about Rs 20 trillion (Rs 20 tn), up eight per cent year-on-year. The report noted that real estate launches fell 44 per cent year-on-year in January 2026, and overall healthy demand could still be offset by rising crude linked input costs that may push cement prices higher by late March or early April 2026.

Continue Reading

Concrete

IIT Guwahati Develops Radiation-Resistant Cement Mortar

Modified mortar offers structural strength and radiation shielding

Published

on

By

Shares

Researchers at the Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IIT Guwahati) have developed a cement mortar that is stronger, more durable and more effective at blocking harmful radiation for nuclear facilities. The modified mortar is designed to act as both a structural component and a radiation shielding barrier by increasing density and durability to limit radiation penetration. Concrete made with the enhanced mortar is expected to reduce the risk of radiation leakage and to support protective structures over extended periods.

To achieve this, the team incorporated four types of microparticles into the cement mortar: boron oxide, lead oxide, bismuth oxide and tungsten oxide. These microparticles were added in small quantities to assess their impact on compressive strength after 28 days and on the material’s ability to shield mixed radiation fields comprising gamma rays and neutrons. The study reported distinct effects for each microparticle, indicating trade-offs between mechanical strength, workability and radiation attenuation.

Professor Hrishikesh Sharma of the Department of Civil Engineering at IIT Guwahati said the safety of nuclear infrastructure depends on the performance of containment materials under extreme mechanical and radiation environments and that the study showed microparticle modifications can improve structural integrity and shielding. The research offers a framework for developing cement-based materials for nuclear power plants, small modular reactors and medical radiation facilities by enhancing resistance to heat, structural loads and radiation. The study was published in Materials and Structures and was co-authored by Professor Sharma, research scholar Sanchit Saxena and Dr Suman Kumar of CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee.

Future work will scale up the developed mortar to a full concrete mix design, conduct structural-level testing of reinforced concrete elements and optimise microparticle dosage to balance mechanical strength, workability, durability and shielding performance. The team is seeking collaborations with nuclear energy agencies, material manufacturers and infrastructure firms for real-world testing and pilot applications. These steps aim to validate performance under simulated field conditions and support safer, more resilient nuclear infrastructure.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Cement Excellence Redefined!

Operational excellence in cement is no longer about producing more – it is about producing smarter, cleaner and more reliably, where cost per tonne meets carbon per tonne.

Published

on

By

Shares

Operational excellence in cement is no longer about producing more – it is about producing smarter, cleaner and more reliably, where cost per tonne meets carbon per tonne.

Operational excellence in cement has moved far beyond the old pursuit of ‘more tonne’. The new benchmark is smarter, cleaner, more reliable production, delivered with discipline across process, people and data. In an industry where energy can account for nearly 30 per cent of manufacturing cost, even marginal gains translate into meaningful value. As Dr SB Hegde, Professor, Jain College of Engineering & Technology, Hubli, and Visiting Professor, Pennsylvania State University, USA, puts it, “Operational excellence is no longer about producing more. It is about producing smarter, cleaner, more reliably, and more sustainably.”

To read the full article Click Here

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds