Connect with us

Concrete

Concrete Temperature

Published

on

Shares

RUPESH KUMAR explains why it is important to control concrete temperature and how it can be done.
With mega structures coming up every?where using high-grade concrete, the control of concrete temperature is become a matter of frequent discu?ssion among civil engineers.

The concern
Green concrete, the nascent stage of concrete hardening, requires a lot of care to mature as good concrete. Concrete is weak in tension bearing; more so, in the initial stage of hardening. Its vulnerability becomes more critical when there are tensile forces induced owing to the hardening process. Being an exothermic reaction, heat is generated during the process; this causes thermal differential and stress that act as a tensile force and cause cracks.

In many cases, cracks developed at the initial stages do not heal and remain or widen further as the concrete shrinks during further hardening. This leads to a situation where structural stability, integrity and durability begin to get compromised. The following observations can be made in the early days of concrete, primarily in the first week:

  • Concrete matures with time and temperature.
  • Strength comes with maturity.
  • In seven days, almost 2/3 of 28 days strength gain for OPC cement-based concrete is expected, though this can vary according to the design mix.
  • The exothermic chemical reaction is most active during this period.
  • Thermal gain is achieved to its maximum during this period; concrete core temperature starts declining after reaching its peak in most cases.
  • Core temperature rise causes thermal differential and stress in concrete.
  • The higher the temperature, faster the maturity. But early higher temperature leads to a greater tendency to crack internally, owing to higher thermal stress. Increasing temperature in the early days has shown more strength on the seventh day and less on day 28 compared to standard maturity of concrete on day seven and 28 respectively, owing to thermal micro-cracking.
  • Concrete plastic shrinkage and initial shrinkage are more dominant during this period and slow down with time. Late shrinkage can continue for many months but the effect is not so significant as the concrete strength is able to counteract the stress of late shrinkage in most cases.
  • Cracks developed during the initial stage owing to plastic shrinkage may not heal automatically in further maturity. On the contrary, at times the crack increases in width, depth or both with time, owing to shrinkage stress acting as a localised tensile force.
  • Cracks develop when the tensile stress increases more than the tensile bearing capacity of the concrete.
  • If the concrete does not gain sufficient strength during the peak concrete temperature, and specifically during higher thermal differential, there is higher likelihood of cracking.
  • The peak temperature of concrete and the thermal differential depends on the green concrete temperature as well as the ambient temperature along with shuttering (temporary formwork) condition.
  • The heat gain in the concrete for a given design mix is the same; thus, the green concrete has a direct effect on the heat gain and rise in concrete core temperature. The higher the green concrete temperature, higher the core peak temperature, and vice versa.
  • The thermal differential causes the stress in the concrete and core to the surface temperature of the concrete must be kept in controlled condition to control the differential. However, the peak temperature of the core beyond a limit may cause other long-term effects like DEF (delayed ettringite formation; a matter yet to be ascertained codally) and needs to be addressed. In Indian tropical conditions, DEF is not expected to be of serious concern if the temperature is taken care of to limit peak temperature below 70?and pozzolanic material is used in the mix. However, thermal differential of concrete must be an area of focus for durable concrete.

Green concrete temperature
The temperature control limits of green concrete are specified in various codes and they all vary. There are references for RCC green concrete temperature for below 40?, up to 38? up to 32?, up to 30? and up to 25? in various codes, including BIS, BS and ASTM.

With higher grades of concrete, the maximum allowable core temperature restrictions are of higher consideration, which restrict the green concrete temperature less than what is allowed in the codes.

To restrict the peak temperature, the green concrete temperature is asked to be reduced. In such a specific scenario, a holistic approach should be taken to define the green concrete temperature as lowering the temperature is a costly affair – although it is not intended to compromise the strength and durability of the concrete. Care should be taken as green concrete temperature control requires a broader approach than simply lowering the temperature during production; it should first be ascertained whether it is really required. It is more prudent to have higher temperature rather than more thermal differential. Also, the lower temperature should be sustained – not less at any one stage of the concrete production, transportation, placement and construction. Further, thermal consideration of concrete is more important for mass concrete than smaller sections.

Way to set concrete temperature limit
To understand the thermal consideration for a given concrete in a project, a preliminary test should be done to arrive at the initial data. Except generally established limits, at present, the codes have not established the procedure for review and analysis of concrete temperature acceptance for a given scenario. A procedure with the action points mentioned below can be used to logically arrive at a calculation analysis and mock-up review to arrive at the concrete temperature acceptance for the given scenario. Some important questions to ask during calculation analysis and mock-up testing are:

How does the concrete temperature rise with time and when the peak temperature is reached for a given mix? For this, a thermal probe can be inserted before placing the concrete and recoding can be done using a thermal data logger. Alternatively, manual set-up and reading can be done, but manual recoding is tedious. The data can be recorded or plotted and analysed.

What is the design calculation with consideration of thermal stress and the crack width allowed as per the design? The data can be obtained from the design calculation sheet or designer.

How is the reinforcement as per the design of the structure and is it able to take the stress developed in the concrete owing to thermal stress? The designer can confirm this and reinforcement adequacy for taking additional thermal stress can be checked considering the crack width limitation as per the design calculation.

How is the maturity of concrete and subsequently the strength of concrete with respect to time? The data can be obtained by taking additional sufficient concrete samples and keeping them under standard testing condition. Curing tank temperature can be taken if the temperature is not being maintained in the curing tank. Testing of concrete sampling shall be done as per testing the procedure at various durations.

Is there any crack observed in the mock up and is there is any crack owing to thermal stress and not plastic shrinkage? To avoid plastic shrinkage, the mock shall preferably be for an adiabatic condition for unreinforced, 1 cu m of mass or miniature replica of the actual structure.

Close observation is required to check crack development; if required, a core can be taken to check the inside of the concrete mass. Normally, thermal stress if developed and causing a crack inside, will reflect up to the surface as the surface to core thermal differential is expected to be more than the thermal differential of the core to the other inner part of concrete. Based on a visual examination, the cracks can be checked.

Now, based on the data mentioned above, one can calculate the estimated concrete temperature and acceptable thermal differential. It can also be analysed whether the concrete is expected to crack beyond the design calculation for the given reinforcement design and estimated concrete peak temperature in the project ambient temperature, and more so for the thermal differential. Then, verification can be done by examining the mock-up concrete.

Thus, one can ascertain whether concrete can sustain the expected peak temperature and thermal differential for a given design mix with reinforcement as per design and ambient condition during construction. In case of non-reinforced concrete (PCC-based structure), reinforcement stress bearing will not be present and the concrete would be able to sustain only as much stress as the maturity of concrete will allow.

About the author
Rupesh Kumar
is a Quality Manager and Concrete Technologist with 18 years of experience working in mega projects in India and abroad. He has dealt with more than 2.5 million cu m of concrete in projects of RMC, hospital, factories, stadium, metros, airports and statue.

This artical was first published in Construction World magazine

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Concrete

Cement Excellence Redefined!

Operational excellence in cement is no longer about producing more – it is about producing smarter, cleaner and more reliably, where cost per tonne meets carbon per tonne.

Published

on

By

Shares

Operational excellence in cement is no longer about producing more – it is about producing smarter, cleaner and more reliably, where cost per tonne meets carbon per tonne.

Operational excellence in cement has moved far beyond the old pursuit of ‘more tonne’. The new benchmark is smarter, cleaner, more reliable production, delivered with discipline across process, people and data. In an industry where energy can account for nearly 30 per cent of manufacturing cost, even marginal gains translate into meaningful value. As Dr SB Hegde, Professor, Jain College of Engineering & Technology, Hubli, and Visiting Professor, Pennsylvania State University, USA, puts it, “Operational excellence is no longer about producing more. It is about producing smarter, cleaner, more reliably, and more sustainably.”

To read the full article Click Here

Continue Reading

Concrete

JSW Cement Begins Production At Nagaur Plant In North India

New greenfield integrated plant raises grinding capacity to 24.1 MTPA

Published

on

By

Shares

JSW Cement, part of the JSW Group, has begun production at a greenfield integrated cement plant in Nagaur, Rajasthan, marking its first such facility in north India. The company said this move raises its total cement grinding capacity to 24.1 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) and its clinker manufacturing capacity, including the joint venture, to nine point seven four MTPA. JSW Cement is described as one of India’s leading green cement producers and is positioned to expand its national presence.

The Nagaur integrated plant is equipped with a three point three zero MTPA clinkerisation unit and a two point five zero MTPA cement grinding unit, with an additional one point zero zero MTPA grinding unit under construction. The facility has been positioned to serve the high-growth markets of Rajasthan, Haryana, Punjab and the National Capital Region. The plant is intended to support construction and infrastructure demand across these nearby states.

The Nagaur unit was funded through a strategic mix of equity and long-term debt, with 8,000 mn from the fresh issue proceeds of the initial public offering (IPO) allocated specifically towards part-financing of the unit. Company executives indicated that the project was completed within 21 months and that the expansion advances the company towards its mid-term capacity target of 41.85 MTPA and its long-term vision of 60 MTPA. The commissioning was cited as an example of the company’s project execution capabilities.

The plant has been designed as a model of sustainable manufacturing and includes provisions for the co-processing of alternative fuels in the kiln to reduce fossil fuel use. The site features a seven km long overland belt conveyor to transport limestone from the mines, reducing road transport, and will soon include a 16 megawatt (MW) Waste Heat Recovery System to capture and reuse process heat, significantly lowering its carbon footprint. These measures are intended to reduce the environmental impact of transport and to lower the carbon intensity of cement production.

Continue Reading

Concrete

JSW Cement Starts Production At Nagaur Plant In North India

Greenfield integrated plant expands northern footprint

Published

on

By

Shares

JSW Cement, one of India’s green cement producers, has commenced production at a greenfield integrated plant in Nagaur, Rajasthan, marking the company’s first such facility in north India. The commissioning expands the company’s national footprint and takes total cement grinding capacity to 24.1 mn t per annum and total clinker manufacturing capacity, including a joint venture component, to nine point seven four mn t per annum. The move positions the firm to serve high-growth markets across the region. Management said the project is a strategic step towards a pan-India presence.

The Nagaur plant is equipped with a three point three mn t clinkerisation unit and a two point five mn t cement grinding unit, with an additional one mn t cement grinding unit under construction. The facility is strategically located to cater to demand in Rajasthan, Haryana, Punjab and the National Capital Region. An overland belt conveyor will move limestone and reduce reliance on road transport. Project execution was completed within 21 months, underlining the firm’s construction capabilities.

The investment for the Nagaur unit was financed through a mix of equity and long-term debt and the company allocated Rs eight bn from fresh issue proceeds of its IPO towards part financing of the project. The expansion advances progress towards a mid-term capacity target of 41.85 mn t and a long-term vision of reaching 60 mn t capacity. The commencement of operations in the north is expected to support infrastructure growth and provide customers with high-quality, eco-friendly cement while maintaining sustainability credentials.

The plant has sustainability features including provisions for co-processing of alternative fuels in the kiln and a seven km overland belt conveyor to cut the environmental impact of road transport. The facility will include a 16 MW Waste Heat Recovery System to capture and reuse heat from production and reduce carbon emissions. The operation supports the company’s ambition to be among the world’s most sustainable cement producers.

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds