Connect with us

Uncategorized

Nippon Steel says expects to close US Steel takeover in 2024

Trump has said to block the deal, which is worth $14.9 billion including debts.

Published

on

Shares

Japan’s Nippon Steel said it still expects to close its takeover of US Steel this year, despite opposition from both President Joe Biden and president-elect Donald Trump. Ahead of the US election, Trump vowed to block the deal, which is worth $14.9 billion including debts. His vice-president elect J.D. Vance also led congressional opposition to the takeover, describing domestic steel production as a national security priority. United States Steel is based in Pittsburgh in the swing state of Pennsylvania, which Biden won in 2020 but Trump took back this week as he stormed to election victory. A Nippon Steel earnings presentation on Thursday maintained that “the transaction is expected to close in… calendar year 2024” pending a US national security review.
“Unless the situation changes dramatically, I believe the conclusion will come by the end of the year,” during Biden’s time in office, vice chairman Takahiro Mori told reporters. Trump will be inaugurated on January 20. “Now that the election is over, I think we have the right environment to discuss the core of this issue in a calm manner,” he added.”I am sure we can close the deal by the year-end,” Mori said.
The deal is being reviewed by a body headed by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen that audits foreign takeovers of US firms, called the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). In September, Biden’s administration extended this review, pushing a conclusion on the politically sensitive deal until after the election.
Major Japanese and American business groups have urged Yellen not to succumb to political pressure when reviewing Nippon Steel’s proposed acquisition. After the deal was announced in December 2023, Biden said it was “vital” for US Steel “to remain an American steel company that is domestically owned and operated”.
“It is important that we maintain strong American steel companies powered by American steelworkers. I told our steelworkers I have their backs, and I meant it,” he said in March. US Steel has argued that the Nippon deal is needed to ensure sufficient investment in its Mon Valley plants in Pennsylvania, the earliest of which dates to 1875.
It warned before the election that if the sale is blocked, it could shutter facilities in the state. In a win for the proposed transcontinental merger, arbitrators ruled in September that Nippon Steel had proven it could assume US Steel’s labour contract obligations. The decision was greeted by US Steel and condemned by the steelworkers union, which has fought the deal.

Uncategorized

SAIL Signs MoU with John Cockerill India for Green Steel

SAIL is focused on transforming its operations and adopting advanced technologies

Published

on

By

Shares

Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) has entered into a strategic partnership with John Cockerill India Limited (JCIL) to advance green steel production and technology within the steel industry.

The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed in Mumbai between SAIL Director (Finance) Anil Kumar Tulsiani and JCIL Managing Director Michael Kotas. This collaboration will focus on improving technologies in cold rolling, carbon steel production, green steel, and specialized silicon steels.

The partnership also aims to integrate green technologies into traditional iron and steelmaking processes to reduce carbon emissions and enhance resource efficiency. This move aligns with SAIL’s sustainability goals and its commitment to reducing the environmental impact of steel production.

SAIL is focused on transforming its operations and adopting advanced technologies to contribute to a greener future in the steel industry. The MoU marks a significant step towards the company’s vision of sustainable growth.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

India Considers ‘Safeguard Duty’ to Control Steel Imports

Indonesia’s steel consumption is around 17 mt.

Published

on

By

Shares

India is exploring the implementation of safeguard duties to curb the influx of steel at low or zero tariffs under the free trade agreement (FTA) with the ASEAN region. This move comes as Chinese companies expand their steel manufacturing capacities in ASEAN countries.
Discussions are underway between the steel and commerce ministries, ahead of the next India-ASEAN FTA review talks scheduled for February. Industry experts report that Chinese firms are adding approximately 97 million tonnes (mt) of blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) capacity in ASEAN, expected to be operational within the next 5-6 years.
With annual steel consumption in ASEAN at around 75 mt, there are concerns that the surplus production could be redirected to India due to the tariff advantages under the India-ASEAN FTA. “Discussions are ongoing, and measures like imposing a safeguard duty are being considered,” a senior government official said.
Alok Sahay, Secretary General of the Indian Steel Association, noted that the influx of 97 mt of new BF-BOF capacity in ASEAN countries poses a threat to Indian steel producers. “Given the current FTA and the limited growth in ASEAN’s consumption, these new capacities are mainly for export. India’s low-to-zero tariffs make it an attractive market compared to the EU or the US,” Sahay added.
The South East Asia Iron and Steel Institute (SEASI) projects that the region’s steel production capacity will reach 145 mt by 2026. Praful Venugopal, CEO of Mittal Steel Indonesia, mentioned that Chinese producers have signed agreements with Indonesia to set up plants that will contribute an additional 20 mt of capacity. Indonesia’s steel consumption is around 17 mt, and these new plants are designed to supply exports.
The anticipated oversupply from ASEAN could lead to depressed domestic steel prices in India, where production in FY24 was 139 mt, just slightly above consumption of 136 mt.
(ET)

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Steel Ministry restricts import of substandard products

The BIS has established 151 standards encompassing 1376 steel grades under the Steel Ministry’s QCO.

Published

on

By

Shares

The central government has identified instances of substandard steel imports and has taken measures to prevent their entry into the country. The Ministry of Steel stated that cheaper imports tend to lower domestic steel prices and negatively impact both large and small steel producers.

According to the ministry, numerous traders and manufacturers have been attempting to bypass the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) requirements by making minor alterations to steel grades. Official reports indicate that this appears to be an effort to import inexpensive steel under the guise of different grades.

The BIS has established 151 standards encompassing 1376 steel grades under the Steel Ministry’s Quality Control Orders (QCO). The ministry emphasized that this framework ensures compliance with BIS standards for both domestically produced and imported steel. The statement further highlighted that these measures are aimed at restricting the import of low-quality steel.

While steel imports require a BIS license, certain grades not yet covered by BIS standards may be imported with a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Steel Ministry. However, the ministry noted instances of misuse of this provision. Officials observed that many traders and manufacturers have been modifying steel grades slightly to circumvent BIS requirements.

Official data revealed that import applications for 1136 additional grades have been submitted to the Steel Ministry. Most of these grades are reportedly neither internationally recognized nor covered by BIS standards. They often involve minor variations in chemical composition or product dimensions and appear to facilitate the import of cheaper steel under the pretext of alternative grades. Furthermore, many of these shipments were ordered without obtaining the requisite NOC from the ministry.

Addressing concerns regarding restrictions on Japanese steel imports, the ministry clarified that 735 applications for importing Japanese steel had been received. Of these, 594 were approved, while 141 were denied due to non-compliance with established norms.

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds