Connect with us

Concrete

Smooth Operator!

Published

on

Shares

A cement manufacturing plant owes its success to smoothly operating machinery, which relies on lubricating oils and grease.
ICR explores how lubricants can be used sustainably, both for economic and environmental benefits.

The cement manufacturing process is heavy duty. Activities such as carrying mined limestone on quarry belts to the pyroprocessor where clinker is produced at high heat levels cause immense load and severe operating conditions for equipment such as kilns, ball mills, conveyors, and quarry-side mobile plants. The cement making machinery works around the clock, subjecting its components like gearboxes and bearings to overheating and premature wear and tear.
It is essential that care be taken and regular maintenance work be done for each of these equipment as the plant shall endure heavy financial and production losses if there is machinery failure, shutdown or loss of heat and energy in the mining area or manufacturing plants. To avoid such a situation and any unscheduled downtime, maintenance operators and managers invest in high performing lubricants, oils and grease that reduce the harm on machinery components.

LUBRICANTS AT WORK
Specially formulated lubricants are required at all stages of the cement making process, namely, extraction, crushing, conveying, grinding, clinker production, grinding and some general lubricants are needed for processes that happen in between.

  • Crushing: In the cement manufacturing process, raw materials such as limestone and clay are crushed to a fine powder. Crushers are used to break down large chunks of raw materials into smaller pieces. Lubricants are applied to the bearings and gears of the crushers to reduce friction and prevent wear and tear, ensuring the equipment operates smoothly and efficiently.
  • Grinding: After the crushing stage, the raw materials are further pulverised in grinding mills to produce a fine powder called raw meal.
  • Ball mills and vertical roller mills are commonly used for grinding in the cement industry.
  • Lubricants are applied to the bearings and gearboxes of these mills to minimise friction, reduce energy consumption, and prevent damage to critical components.
  • Kiln: The raw meal is heated in a rotary kiln to a temperature of around 1450°C, where it undergoes a chemical transformation to become clinker. The kiln is a crucial component in cement manufacturing and requires effective lubrication. Lubricants are applied to the kiln supporting rollers, bearings, and gears to reduce friction, prevent overheating and ensure smooth rotation and operation of the kiln.
  • Conveyors: Throughout the cement production process, various types of conveyors are used to transport raw materials, clinker and finished cement. Lubricants are essential for the conveyor system’s smooth operation. They are applied to the bearings, chains and gears of conveyors to reduce friction, minimise wear and tear and prevent breakdowns or malfunctions that could disrupt the production flow.
  • Fans and Blowers: Cement plants utilise fans and blowers for various purposes, such as providing combustion air, circulating hot gases within the kiln, and transporting materials. These fans and blowers have rotating parts that require lubrication to ensure their optimal performance. Lubricants are applied to the bearings, gears and shafts of fans and blowers to reduce friction, improve efficiency and extend their operational lifespan.
  • Pumps: Pumps are used in cement plants for a range of applications, including the transportation of water, fuel and various process fluids. Lubricants are necessary for the pump’s bearings and seals to reduce friction, prevent overheating, and maintain the pump’s efficiency. Proper lubrication helps to minimise energy consumption and ensure reliable pump operation.
  • Preheaters and Pre-calciners: Preheaters and pre-calciners are used to preheat and pre-calcine raw materials before they enter the kiln. These systems have moving parts, such as fans, rollers and chains, which require lubrication to reduce friction, prevent wear and maintain their performance and reliability.
  • Cement Mills: After the clinker is produced in the kiln, it is finely ground in cement mills to produce cement. Lubricants are applied to the bearings and gears of these mills to reduce friction, enhance grinding efficiency, and prevent premature failure of critical components.
  • Bag Filters: Bag filters are used in cement plants to capture and remove dust particles from the exhaust gases generated during various processes. These filters consist of fabric bags that require regular cleaning and maintenance. Lubricants are applied to the bag filter’s mechanisms and moving parts, such as valves and fan bearings, to ensure smooth operation and prevent any potential issues that could affect the filtration efficiency.In each of these functions, the selection of appropriate lubricants is crucial. Factors such as operating conditions (temperature and humidity), load, speed and type of equipment must be considered to determine the most suitable lubricants for each application. Regular lubrication and maintenance practices are essential to optimise the performance, reliability and lifespan of the equipment in a cement plant.

ROLE OF LUBRICANTS
In the cement industry, lubricants play a crucial role in ensuring the smooth and efficient operation of various machinery and equipment involved in the production process. Cement manufacturing involves the extraction of raw materials, such as limestone and clay, which are then processed and transformed into the final product through a series of stages, including crushing, grinding, heating, and mixing. Throughout this complex and demanding process, lubricants provide essential benefits that contribute to the overall productivity, reliability and longevity of the equipment involved.


One of the primary functions of lubricants in the cement industry is to reduce friction between moving parts. Machinery used in cement plants, such as crushers, ball mills, conveyor belts, kilns and pumps, consist of numerous mechanical components that require smooth operation. By applying lubricants, a thin layer is formed between contacting surfaces, which reduces friction and minimises wear and tear. This helps to prevent damage to critical parts, reduce energy consumption, and improve the overall efficiency of the equipment.
Lubricants also play a vital role in protecting equipment from corrosion. Cement manufacturing involves exposure to harsh operating conditions, including high temperatures, humidity, and the presence of abrasive dust particles. These factors can lead to the deterioration of metal surfaces, which can significantly impact the performance and lifespan of machinery. Lubricants with anti-corrosion properties form a protective barrier that shields metal surfaces from moisture, chemical agents, and other corrosive elements, thereby preventing rust and corrosion and extending the equipment’s service life.
“The critical equipment like kiln, vertical rolling oil, ball mill, crushers, roller press, etc. operate continuously under challenging conditions. The gear boxes in this equipment are subjected to extreme loading conditions and may cause micro pitting, premature wear problems and consumes a lot of energy. MAK Lubricants offer energy efficient gear oils with anti-micro pitting resistance reducing energy consumption and extending the equipment life respectively,” says Sudhahar P, Executive Director (Lubes), Bharat Petroleum Corporation.
“Heavy loads, high pressures, and temperatures in the hydraulic system of the grinding mill causes increased stress on hydraulic oil and thereby reduces its service life. Our energy efficient long life hydraulic oil not only has a potential to save energy but also provide longer oil life along with improved reliability of equipment,” he adds.
Moreover, lubricants aid in the cooling of equipment. Many cement manufacturing processes generate considerable heat due to the grinding and calcination of raw materials. Excessive heat can negatively affect the performance and reliability of machinery. By using lubricants with high thermal conductivity, heat generated during operation can be efficiently dissipated, ensuring that the equipment operates within the desired temperature range. This helps to prevent overheating, reduces the risk of thermal damage and contributes to the overall safety and reliability of the production process.
In addition to the aforementioned functions, lubricants also provide effective sealing properties. Cement plants often employ rotary kilns, which are large cylindrical structures used for the high-temperature processing of raw materials. These kilns require a reliable sealing system to prevent heat and gas leakage. Lubricants, such as high-temperature grease and specialised sealants, create effective seals between moving parts, ensuring that the kilns operate efficiently and maintain the desired temperature and gas flow, while also minimising energy losses.
Furthermore, lubricants contribute to the overall maintenance and operational cost reduction in the cement industry. By using appropriate lubricants and implementing effective lubrication practices, equipment downtime due to mechanical failures can be minimised. Regular lubrication helps to keep the machinery in optimal condition, reduces the frequency of repairs and replacements, and extends the equipment’s lifespan. This translates into improved production efficiency, reduced maintenance costs and increased profitability for cement manufacturers.
It is important to note that selecting the right lubricants for each specific application is crucial to ensure optimal performance and maximise the benefits mentioned above. Factors such as operating conditions, equipment type, load, and speed must be carefully considered when choosing lubricants. Cement manufacturers often collaborate with lubricant suppliers or engage in extensive research and development to identify the most suitable lubricants for their specific requirements.
Lubricants play a vital role in the cement industry by reducing friction, protecting against corrosion, aiding in cooling, providing effective sealing, and contributing to maintenance and cost reduction. By utilising appropriate lubrication practices and selecting the right lubricants, cement manufacturers can enhance equipment performance, prolong the lifespan of machinery, improve operational efficiency and ultimately achieve higher productivity and profitability in their operations.

COST EFFICIENCY AND HIGH PRODUCTIVITY
Lubricants play a significant role in achieving cost efficiency and higher productivity in cement plants through various mechanisms.
Reduced equipment downtime: Proper lubrication with high-quality lubricants helps prevent equipment failures and breakdowns. Lubricants create a protective barrier between moving parts, reducing friction and wear. This minimises the risk of mechanical failures, such as bearing failures or gear damage, which can lead to unplanned downtime. By minimising equipment downtime, cement plants can maximise production output and avoid costly disruptions.
Extended equipment lifespan: Lubricants provide essential protection to the machinery by reducing friction, preventing wear and minimising corrosion. This leads to increased equipment lifespan, as components experience less stress and damage. By extending the lifespan of critical equipment such as crushers, mills, kilns and conveyors, cement plants can avoid or delay costly capital expenditures for replacements, resulting in significant cost savings over time.
Energy efficiency: Lubricants with low friction properties and high thermal conductivity contribute to energy efficiency in cement plants. By reducing friction between moving parts, lubricants help minimise energy losses due to heat generation. Additionally, lubricants that efficiently dissipate heat help maintain optimal operating temperatures, preventing excessive energy consumption. Improved energy efficiency directly translates into cost savings and higher productivity.
Maintenance cost reduction: Regular lubrication and the use of appropriate lubricants help maintain equipment in optimal condition. Lubricants reduce friction, wear, and corrosion, reducing the need for frequent repairs or replacements of components. By implementing effective lubrication practices, cement plants can minimise maintenance costs, save on spare parts and allocate resources
more efficiently.
“Generally, break down the journey to lubrication excellence into six categories: lubricant selection, reception and storage, handling and application, contamination control, lubricant analysis, and environmental disposal. This article will focus on the first five categories and provide examples of how to improve in regard to overall lubrication excellence and cost-effectiveness. While environmental disposal is critical, it’s not necessarily a good place to look for cost savings,” says Mukesh Saxena, Joint President, Star Cement.
“Selecting the proper lubricant from the beginning is the most important step you can take to improve machine productivity. Your equipment’s needs will drive the selection process, but having a thorough understanding of different lubricant properties will allow you to pick the optimum solution,” he adds.
Achieving cost efficiency and higher productivity with lubricants requires proper selection, application, and maintenance practices. Cement plants should work closely with lubricant suppliers or industry experts to identify the most suitable lubricants for their specific equipment and operating conditions. Regular monitoring, lubricant analysis, and adherence to recommended lubrication schedules are essential to maximise the benefits and optimise the performance of the lubrication program in a cement plant.

IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENT
The performance and effectiveness of industrial lubricants used in cement plants can be significantly impacted by the external environment. Factors such as temperature and humidity play a crucial role. Cement plants often operate in harsh conditions with high temperatures and humidity levels. Extreme temperatures can affect the viscosity of lubricants, compromising their ability to provide proper lubrication. High humidity can introduce moisture, leading to emulsion formation and affecting lubricant stability.
Dust and contaminants are another external factor that can impact lubricant performance. Cement production generates fine dust particles that can enter lubrication systems, compromising lubricant effectiveness and accelerating wear on equipment.
Chemical exposure is also a concern as cement manufacturing involves the use of various chemicals. Incompatible chemicals can lead to lubricant breakdown, loss of viscosity, and increased oxidation.
Operational loads and speeds of equipment in cement plants vary, requiring lubricants with appropriate viscosity, load-carrying capacity,
and film strength. Regulatory and environmental considerations are also important as lubricants must comply with regulations and be environmentally friendly.
Cement plants should collaborate with lubricant suppliers, implement regular monitoring and analysis, and ensure proper storage and handling to mitigate the impact of the external environment on lubricant performance.
“Cement plants are process plants, thousands of rotating machines operating 24×7, 365 days, availability of these machines being critical and plant reliability is vital, operating conditions of cement plants is hostile, lubricants get contaminated before being filled in machines and while in service. 80 per cent of failures are due to lubrication errors,” says Gaurav K Mathur, Director and Chief Executive, Global Technical Services.
“System oriented approach for contamination free lubrication is the foremost requirement of industry TLM is implementation of SOPs for uniform adaptation of best lubrication practices, oil top up, oil disposal or grease replenishment in plummer block,” he adds.

SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH LUBRICANT EFFICIENCY


Cement plants can achieve sustainability in their lubricant use by implementing several strategies and practices. Here are some key approaches:

  • Select environment-friendly lubricants: Cement plants can choose lubricants that are formulated with environmentally friendly ingredients and have minimal impact on the environment. This includes selecting lubricants that are biodegradable, non-toxic, and free from substances that are harmful to human health or ecosystems. Certifications such as the EU Ecolabel or the USDA BioPreferred programme can guide the selection of sustainable lubricants.
  • Optimise lubricant consumption: Cement plants can optimise lubricant consumption by implementing proper lubrication practices. This includes regular monitoring of lubricant levels, applying the right amount of lubricant to each component, and avoiding over-lubrication. By optimising lubricant usage, cement plants can reduce waste, lower lubricant consumption and minimise the environmental footprint associated with lubricant disposal.
  • Implement lubricant recycling and reclamation: Cement plants can explore options for recycling and reclaiming lubricants. Some lubricants can be reprocessed, filtered, or purified for reuse, extending their lifespan and reducing the need for new lubricant purchases. Implementing lubricant recycling programmes can minimise waste generation and conserve resources.
  • Promote energy-efficient lubricants: Energy-efficient lubricants can help reduce energy consumption in cement plants. These lubricants have low friction properties and can contribute to energy savings by reducing mechanical losses in equipment. By selecting lubricants specifically designed for energy efficiency, cement plants can enhance their sustainability efforts and reduce their overall energy consumption.
  • Proper lubricant storage and handling: Proper storage and handling of lubricants are crucial for maintaining their quality and preventing contamination. Cement plants should ensure that lubricants are stored in sealed containers, away from direct sunlight, excessive heat, or extreme temperatures. Adequate labelling and inventory management practices should be implemented to minimise the risk of lubricant spoilage or degradation.
  • Regular lubricant analysis and monitoring: Implementing a lubricant analysis and monitoring program allows cement plants to assess lubricant condition and performance. Regular analysis can help identify issues such as contamination, degradation or excessive wear. By monitoring lubricant condition, plants can schedule maintenance activities effectively, avoid premature lubricant changes and optimise lubrication intervals, reducing waste and improving overall sustainability.
  • Collaborate with lubricant suppliers: Cement plants can collaborate closely with lubricant suppliers and industry experts to identify sustainable lubrication solutions. Lubricant suppliers can provide guidance on selecting environmentally friendly products, offer training on best practices and assist with lubricant analysis and optimisation.
  • Employee training and awareness: Promoting employee training and awareness programmes on sustainable lubricant use can foster a culture of environmental responsibility within the cement plant. Educating employees on proper lubrication practices, the importance of sustainability and the potential environmental impacts of lubricant use can empower them to actively contribute to the plant’s sustainability goals.

CONCLUSION
Lubricants play a vital role in the cement industry, ensuring smooth equipment operation and productivity. Proper lubrication practices lead to cost efficiency, extended equipment lifespan, and reduced downtime. Cement plants should select lubricants that withstand harsh conditions, comply with regulations, and prioritise environmental sustainability. Optimising lubricant consumption, promoting energy-efficient options, and implementing recycling programmes contribute to a greener approach. Regular analysis, collaboration with suppliers, and employee training further enhance sustainability efforts. By integrating these strategies, cement plants can minimise their environmental impact and achieve a more efficient and sustainable manufacturing process.

Concrete

Cement Industry Backs Co-Processing to Tackle Global Waste

Industry bodies recently urged policy support for cement co-processing as waste solution

Published

on

By

Shares



Leading industry bodies, including the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), European Composites Industry Association, International Solid Waste Association – Africa, Mission Possible Partnership and the Global Waste-to-Energy Research and Technology Council, have issued a joint statement highlighting the cement industry’s potential role in addressing the growing global challenge of non-recyclable and non-reusable waste. The organisations have called for stronger policy support to unlock the full potential of cement industry co-processing as a safe, effective and sustainable waste management solution.
Co-processing enables both energy recovery and material recycling by using suitable waste to replace fossil fuels in cement kilns, while simultaneously recycling residual ash into the cement itself. This integrated approach delivers a zero-waste solution, reduces landfill dependence and complements conventional recycling by addressing waste streams that cannot be recycled or are contaminated.
Already recognised across regions including Europe, India, Latin America and North America, co-processing operates under strict regulatory and technical frameworks to ensure high standards of safety, emissions control and transparency.
Commenting on the initiative, Thomas Guillot, Chief Executive of the GCCA, said co-processing offers a circular, community-friendly waste solution but requires effective regulatory frameworks and supportive public policy to scale further. He noted that while some cement kilns already substitute over 90 per cent of their fuel with waste, many regions still lack established practices.
The joint statement urges governments and institutions to formally recognise co-processing within waste policy frameworks, support waste collection and pre-treatment, streamline permitting, count recycled material towards national recycling targets, and provide fiscal incentives that reflect environmental benefits. It also calls for stronger public–private partnerships and international knowledge sharing.
With global waste generation estimated at over 11 billion tonnes annually and uncontrolled municipal waste projected to rise sharply by 2050, the signatories believe co-processing represents a practical and scalable response. With appropriate policy backing, it can help divert waste from landfills, reduce fossil fuel use in cement manufacturing and transform waste into a valuable societal resource.    

Continue Reading

Concrete

Industry Bodies Call for Wider Use of Cement Co-Processing

Joint statement seeks policy support for sustainable waste management

Published

on

By

Shares



Leading industry organisations have called for stronger policy support to accelerate the adoption of cement industry co-processing as a sustainable solution for managing non-recyclable and non-reusable waste. In a joint statement, bodies including the Global Cement and Concrete Association, European Composites Industry Association, International Solid Waste Association – Africa, Mission Possible Partnership and the Global Waste-to-Energy Research and Technology Council highlighted the role co-processing can play in addressing the growing global waste challenge.
Co-processing enables the use of waste as an alternative to fossil fuels in cement kilns, while residual ash is incorporated into cementitious materials, resulting in a zero-waste process. The approach supports both energy recovery and material recycling, complements conventional recycling systems and reduces reliance on landfill infrastructure. It is primarily applied to waste streams that are contaminated or unsuitable for recycling.
The organisations noted that co-processing is already recognised in regions such as Europe, India, Latin America and North America, operating under regulated frameworks to ensure safety, emissions control and transparency. However, adoption remains uneven globally, with some plants achieving over 90 per cent fuel substitution while others lack enabling policies.
The statement urged governments and institutions to formally recognise co-processing in waste management frameworks, streamline environmental permitting, incentivise waste collection and pre-treatment, account for recycled material content in national targets, and support public-private partnerships. The call comes amid rising global waste volumes, which are estimated at over 11 billion tonnes annually, with unmanaged waste contributing to greenhouse gas emissions, pollution and health risks.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Why Cement Needs CCUS

Published

on

By

Shares



Cement’s deep decarbonisation cannot be achieved through efficiency and fuel switching alone, making CCUS essential to address unavoidable process emissions from calcination. ICR explores if with the right mix of policy support, shared infrastructure, and phased scale-up from pilots to clusters, CCUS can enable India’s cement industry to align growth with its net-zero ambitions.

Cement underpins modern development—from housing and transport to renewable energy infrastructure—but it is also one of the world’s most carbon-intensive materials, with global production of around 4 billion tonnes per year accounting for 7 to 8 per cent of global CO2 emissions, according to the GCCA. What makes cement uniquely hard to abate is that 60 to 65 per cent of its emissions arise from limestone calcination, a chemical process that releases CO2 irrespective of the energy source used; the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) therefore classifies cement as a hard-to-abate sector, noting that even fully renewable-powered kilns would continue to emit significant process emissions. While the industry has achieved substantial reductions over the past two decades through energy efficiency, alternative fuels and clinker substitution using fly ash, slag, and calcined clays, studies including the IEA Net Zero Roadmap and GCCA decarbonisation pathways show these levers can deliver only 50 to 60 per cent emissions reduction before reaching technical and material limits, leaving Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) as the only scalable and durable option to address remaining calcination emissions—an intervention the IPCC estimates will deliver nearly two-thirds of cumulative cement-sector emission reductions globally by mid-century, making CCUS a central pillar of any credible net-zero cement pathway.

Process emissions vs energy emissions
Cement’s carbon footprint is distinct from many other industries because it stems from two sources: energy emissions and process emissions. Energy emissions arise from burning fuels to heat kilns to around 1,450°C and account for roughly 35 to 40 per cent of total cement CO2 emissions, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). These can be progressively reduced through efficiency improvements, alternative fuels such as biomass and RDF, and electrification supported by renewable power. Over the past two decades, such measures have delivered measurable gains, with global average thermal energy intensity in cement production falling by nearly 20 per cent since 2000, as reported by the IEA and GCCA.
The larger and more intractable challenge lies in process emissions, which make up approximately 60 per cent to 65 per cent of cement’s total CO2 output. These emissions are released during calcination, when limestone (CaCO3) is converted into lime (CaO), inherently emitting CO2 regardless of fuel choice or energy efficiency—a reality underscored by the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). Even aggressive clinker substitution using fly ash, slag, or calcined clays is constrained by material availability and performance requirements, typically delivering 20 to 40 per cent emissions reduction at best, as outlined in the GCCA–TERI India Cement Roadmap and IEA Net Zero Scenario. This structural split explains why cement is classified as a hard-to-abate sector and why incremental improvements alone are insufficient; as energy emissions decline, process emissions will dominate, making Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) a critical intervention to intercept residual CO2 and keep the sector’s net-zero ambitions within reach.

Where CCUS stands today
Globally, CCUS in cement is moving from concept to early industrial reality, led by Europe and North America, with the IEA noting that cement accounts for nearly 40 per cent of planned CCUS projects in heavy industry, reflecting limited alternatives for deep decarbonisation; a flagship example is Heidelberg Materials’ Brevik CCS project in Norway, commissioned in 2025, designed to capture about 400,000 tonnes of CO2 annually—nearly half the plant’s emissions—with permanent offshore storage via the Northern Lights infrastructure (Reuters, Heidelberg Materials), alongside progress at projects in the UK, Belgium, and the US such as Padeswood, Lixhe (LEILAC), and Ste. Genevieve, all enabled by strong policy support, public funding, and shared transport-and-storage infrastructure.
These experiences show that CCUS scales fastest when policy support, infrastructure availability, and risk-sharing mechanisms align, with Europe bridging the viability gap through EU ETS allowances, Innovation Fund grants, and CO2 hubs despite capture costs remaining high at US$ 80-150 per tonne of CO2 (IEA, GCCA); India, by contrast, is at an early readiness stage but gaining momentum through five cement-sector CCU testbeds launched by the Department of Science and Technology (DST) under academia–industry public–private partnerships involving IITs and producers such as JSW Cement, Dalmia Cement, and JK Cement, targeting 1-2 tonnes of CO2 per day to validate performance under Indian conditions (ETInfra, DST), with the GCCA–TERI India Roadmap identifying the current phase as a foundation-building decade essential for achieving net-zero by 2070.
Amit Banka, Founder and CEO, WeNaturalists, says “Carbon literacy means more than understanding that CO2 harms the climate. It means cement professionals grasping why their specific plant’s emissions profile matters, how different CCUS technologies trade off between energy consumption and capture rates, where utilisation opportunities align with their operational reality, and what governance frameworks ensure verified, permanent carbon sequestration. Cement manufacturing contributes approximately 8 per cent of global carbon emissions. Addressing this requires professionals who understand CCUS deeply enough to make capital decisions, troubleshoot implementation challenges, and convince boards to invest substantial capital.”

Technology pathways for cement
Cement CCUS encompasses a range of technologies, from conventional post-combustion solvent-based systems to process-integrated solutions that directly target calcination, each with different energy requirements, retrofit complexity, and cost profiles. The most mature option remains amine-based post-combustion capture, already deployed at industrial scale and favoured for early cement projects because it can be retrofitted to existing flue-gas streams; however, capture costs typically range from US$ 60-120 per tonne of CO2, depending on CO2 concentration, plant layout, and energy integration.
Lovish Ahuja, Chief Sustainability Officer, Dalmia Cement (Bharat), says, “CCUS in Indian cement can be viewed through two complementary lenses. If technological innovation, enabling policies, and societal acceptance fail to translate ambition into action, CCUS risks becoming a significant and unavoidable compliance cost for hard-to-abate sectors such as cement, steel, and aluminium. However, if global commitments under the Paris Agreement and national targets—most notably India’s Net Zero 2070 pledge—are implemented at scale through sustained policy and industry action, CCUS shifts from a future liability to a strategic opportunity. In that scenario, it becomes a platform for technological leadership, long-term competitiveness, and systemic decarbonisation rather than merely a regulatory burden.”
“Accelerating CCUS adoption cannot hinge on a single policy lever; it demands a coordinated ecosystem approach. This includes mission-mode governance, alignment across ministries, and a mix of enabling instruments such as viability gap funding, concessional and ESG-linked finance, tax incentives, and support for R&D, infrastructure, and access to geological storage. Importantly, while cement is largely a regional commodity with limited exportability due to its low value-to-weight ratio, CCUS innovation itself can become a globally competitive export. By developing, piloting, and scaling cost-effective CCUS solutions domestically, India can not only decarbonise its own cement industry but also position itself as a supplier of affordable CCUS technologies and services to cement markets worldwide,” he adds.
Process-centric approaches seek to reduce the energy penalty associated with solvent regeneration by altering where and how CO2 is separated. Technologies such as LEILAC/Calix, which uses indirect calcination to produce a high-purity CO2 stream, are scaling toward a ~100,000 tCO2 per year demonstrator (LEILAC-2) following successful pilots, while calcium looping leverages limestone chemistry to achieve theoretical capture efficiencies above 90 per cent, albeit still at pilot and demonstration stages requiring careful integration. Other emerging routes—including oxy-fuel combustion, membrane separation, solid sorbents, and cryogenic or hybrid systems—offer varying trade-offs between purity, energy use, and retrofit complexity; taken together, recent studies suggest that no single technology fits all plants, making a multi-technology, site-specific approach the most realistic pathway for scaling CCUS across the cement sector.
Yash Agarwal, Co-Founder, Carbonetics Carbon Capture, says, “We are fully focused on CCUS, and for us, a running plant is a profitable plant. What we have done is created digital twins that allow operators to simulate and resolve specific problems in record time. In a conventional setup, when an issue arises, plants often have to shut down operations and bring in expert consultants. What we offer instead is on-the-fly consulting. As soon as a problem is detected, the system automatically provides a set of potential solutions that can be tested on a running plant. This approach ensures that plant shutdowns are avoided and production is not impacted.”

The economics of CCUS
Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) remains one of the toughest economic hurdles in cement decarbonisation, with the IEA estimating capture costs of US$ 80-150 per tonne of CO2, and full-system costs raising cement production by US$ 30-60 per tonne, potentially increasing prices by 20 to 40 per cent without policy support—an untenable burden for a low-margin, price-sensitive industry like India’s.
Global experience shows CCUS advances beyond pilots only when the viability gap is bridged through strong policy mechanisms such as EU ETS allowances, Innovation Fund grants, and carbon Contracts for Difference (CfDs), yet even in Europe few projects have reached final investment decision (GCCA); India’s lack of a dedicated CCUS financing framework leaves projects reliant on R&D grants and balance sheets, reinforcing the IEA Net Zero Roadmap conclusion that carbon markets, green public procurement, and viability gap funding are essential to spread costs across producers, policymakers, and end users and prevent CCUS from remaining confined to demonstrations well into the 2030s.

Utilisation or storage
Carbon utilisation pathways are often the first entry point for CCUS in cement because they offer near-term revenue potential and lower infrastructure complexity. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that current utilisation routes—such as concrete curing, mineralisation into aggregates, precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC), and limited chemical conversion—can realistically absorb only 5 per cent to 10 per cent of captured CO2 at a typical cement plant. In India, utilisation is particularly attractive for early pilots as it avoids the immediate need for pipelines, injection wells, and long-term liability frameworks. Accordingly, Department of Science and Technology (DST)–supported cement CCU testbeds are already demonstrating mineralisation and CO2-cured concrete applications at 1–2 tonnes of CO2 per day, validating performance, durability, and operability under Indian conditions.
However, utilisation faces hard limits of scale and permanence. India’s cement sector emits over 200 million tonnes of CO2 annually (GCCA), far exceeding the absorptive capacity of domestic utilisation markets, while many pathways—especially fuels and chemicals—are energy-intensive and dependent on costly renewable power and green hydrogen. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) cautions that most CCU routes do not guarantee permanent storage unless CO2 is mineralised or locked into long-lived materials, making geological storage indispensable for deep decarbonisation. India has credible storage potential in deep saline aquifers, depleted oil and gas fields, and basalt formations such as the Deccan Traps (NITI Aayog, IEA), and hub-based models—where multiple plants share transport and storage infrastructure—can reduce costs and improve bankability, as seen in Norway’s Northern Lights project. The pragmatic pathway for India is therefore a dual-track approach: utilise CO2 where it is economical and store it where permanence and scale are unavoidable, enabling early learning while building the backbone for net-zero cement.

Policy, infrastructure and clusters
Scaling CCUS in the cement sector hinges on policy certainty, shared infrastructure, and coordinated cluster development, rather than isolated plant-level action. The IEA notes that over 70 per cent of advanced industrial CCUS projects globally rely on strong government intervention—through carbon pricing, capital grants, tax credits, and long-term offtake guarantees—with Europe’s EU ETS, Innovation Fund, and carbon Contracts for Difference (CfDs) proving decisive in advancing projects like Brevik CCS. In contrast, India lacks a dedicated CCUS policy framework, rendering capture costs of USD 80–150 per tonne of CO2 economically prohibitive without state support (IEA, GCCA), a gap the GCCA–TERI India Cement Roadmap highlights can be bridged through carbon markets, viability gap funding, and green public procurement.
Milan R Trivedi, Vice President, Shree Digvijay Cement, says, “CCUS represents both an unavoidable near-term compliance cost and a long-term strategic opportunity for Indian cement producers. While current capture costs of US$ 100-150 per tonne of CO2 strain margins and necessitate upfront retrofit investments driven by emerging mandates and NDCs, effective policy support—particularly a robust, long-term carbon pricing mechanism with tradable credits under frameworks like India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS)—can de-risk capital deployment and convert CCUS into a competitive advantage. With such enablers in place, CCUS can unlock 10 per cent to 20 per cent green price premiums, strengthen ESG positioning, and allow Indian cement to compete in global low-carbon markets under regimes such as the EU CBAM, North America’s buy-clean policies, and Middle Eastern green procurement, transforming compliance into export-led leadership.”
Equally critical is cluster-based CO2 transport and storage infrastructure, which can reduce unit costs by 30 to 50 per cent compared to standalone projects (IEA, Clean Energy Ministerial); recognising this, the DST has launched five CCU testbeds under academia–industry public–private partnerships, while NITI Aayog works toward a national CCUS mission focused on hubs and regional planning. Global precedents—from Norway’s Northern Lights to the UK’s HyNet and East Coast clusters—demonstrate that CCUS scales fastest when governments plan infrastructure at a regional level, making cluster-led development, backed by early public investment, the decisive enabler for India to move CCUS from isolated pilots to a scalable industrial solution.
Paul Baruya, Director of Strategy and Sustainability, FutureCoal, says, “Cement is a foundational material with a fundamental climate challenge: process emissions that cannot be eliminated through clean energy alone. The IPCC is clear that in the absence of a near-term replacement of Portland cement chemistry, CCS is essential to address the majority of clinker-related emissions. With global cement production at around 4 gigatonnes (Gt) and still growing, cement decarbonisation is not a niche undertaking, it is a large-scale industrial transition.”

From pilots to practice
Moving CCUS in cement from pilots to practice requires a sequenced roadmap aligning technology maturity, infrastructure development, and policy support: the IEA estimates that achieving net zero will require CCUS to scale from less than 1 Mt of CO2 captured today to over 1.2 Gt annually by 2050, while the GCCA Net Zero Roadmap projects CCUS contributing 30 per cent to 40 per cent of total cement-sector emissions reductions by mid-century, alongside efficiency, alternative fuels, and clinker substitution.
MM Rathi, Joint President – Power Plants, Shree Cement, says, “The Indian cement sector is currently at a pilot to early demonstration stage of CCUS readiness. A few companies have initiated small-scale pilots focused on capturing CO2 from kiln flue gases and exploring utilisation routes such as mineralisation and concrete curing. CCUS has not yet reached commercial integration due to high capture costs (US$ 80-150 per tonne of CO2), lack of transport and storage infrastructure, limited access to storage sites, and absence of long-term policy incentives. While Europe and North America have begun early commercial deployment, large-scale CCUS adoption in India is more realistically expected post-2035, subject to enabling infrastructure and policy frameworks.”
Early pilots—such as India’s DST-backed CCU testbeds and Europe’s first commercial-scale plants—serve as learning platforms to validate integration, costs, and operational reliability, but large-scale deployment will depend on cluster-based scale-up, as emphasised by the IPCC AR6, which highlights the need for early CO2 transport and storage planning to avoid long-term emissions lock-in. For India, the GCCA–TERI India Roadmap identifies CCUS as indispensable for achieving net-zero by 2070, following a pragmatic pathway: pilot today to build confidence, cluster in the 2030s to reduce costs, and institutionalise CCUS by mid-century so that low-carbon cement becomes the default, not a niche, in the country’s infrastructure growth.

Conclusion
Cement will remain indispensable to India’s development, but its long-term viability hinges on addressing its hardest emissions challenge—process CO2 from calcination—which efficiency gains, alternative fuels, and clinker substitution alone cannot eliminate; global evidence from the IPCC, IEA, and GCCA confirms that Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) is the only scalable pathway capable of delivering the depth of reduction required for net zero. With early commercial projects emerging in Europe and structured pilots underway in India, CCUS has moved beyond theory into a decisive decade where learning, localisation, and integration will shape outcomes; however, success will depend less on technology availability and more on collective execution, including coordinated policy frameworks, shared transport and storage infrastructure, robust carbon markets, and carbon-literate capabilities.
For India, a deliberate transition from pilots to practice—anchored in cluster-based deployment, supported by public–private partnerships, and aligned with national development and climate goals—can transform CCUS from a high-cost intervention into a mainstream industrial solution, enabling the cement sector to keep building the nation while sharply reducing its climate footprint.

– Kanika Mathur

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds