Connect with us

Economy & Market

On the Path of Transformation

Published

on

Shares

The logistics sector is fundamental to the development of a country. Logistics is a sector where the trend is determined by the country’s overall economic performance.

Logistics including transportation, inventory management, warehousing, materials handling and packaging, and integration of information, is related to management of flow of goods between the point of origin and the point of consumption. With the growing Indian economy and changing business perspectives, the scope of the logistics industry has broadened from rudimentary transportation of goods to include end-to-end supply chain solutions including warehousing and express delivery.

The Indian logistics industry was estimated to be approximately $160 billion in FY17. The key segments include road, rail, coastal, warehousing, cold chain and container freight stations and inland container depots (CFS/ICD). The domestic logistics market is expected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 10 per cent. Indian logistics market is expected to be driven by the growth in the manufacturing, retail, FMCG and e-commerce sectors.

Development of logistics-related infrastructure such as dedicated freight corridors, logistics parks, free trade warehousing zones, and container freight stations are expected to improve efficiency. The industry is dominated by transportation, which accounts for over 85 per cent of total value, and its share is expected to remain high over the next few years. The sector provides employment to more than 22 million people. Improving logistics sector has significant bearing on exports and media sources estimate that a 10 per cent decrease in indirect logistics cost could potentially increase 5 to 8 per cent of exports.

Of the various modes of transportation, roads and railway are the most preferred mode accounting for approximately 60 per cent and 30 per cent of the total cargo volumes handled, respectively. The share of other transportation modes comprising Inland shipping, pipelines and airways remains minimal accounting for the balance 10 per cent. The higher transportation costs in India can be associated with poor road infrastructure leading to lowering of the maximum distance that can be covered by any commercial vehicle, old vehicles fleet and higher cess and toll on the highways while the higher warehousing costs are on account of shortage of warehousing capacity in India, non-standardisation of warehouses in terms of IT application, etc.

As per the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, India’s logistics cost as a per cent of GDP stood at 13-14 per cent compared to 10- 11 per cent for BRIC countries and 8-9 per cent for developed countries. The US spends 9.5 per cent and Germany 8 per cent of their GDP on logistics costs. A significant proportion of the higher cost can be attributed to the absence of an efficient intermodal and multimodal transport systems. Going forward, the logistics cost as a per cent of GDP for India is expected to decline driven by initiatives such as implementation of GST, investments towards road infrastructure, development of inland waterways and coastal shipping, thrust towards dedicated freight corridors, etc.

Currently the Indian logistics industry is highly fragmented and unorganised. Owing to the presence of numerous unorganised players in the industry, it remains fragmented with the organised players accounting for approximately 10 per cent of the total market share. With the consumer base of the sector encompassing a wide range of industries including retail, automobile, telecom, heavy industries, etc., logistics industry has been increasingly attracting investments in the last decade.

The sector is facing challenges such as under-developed material handling infrastructure, fragmented warehousing, multiple regulatory/policymaking bodies, lack of seamless movement of goods across modes, minimal integrated IT infrastructure. In order to develop this sector focus on new technology, improved investment, skilling, removing bottlenecks, improving intermodal transportation, automation, single-window system for giving clearances, and simplifying processes would be required.

Global scenario
Warehousing primarily refers to the storage of goods to be transported, whether inbound or outbound. The warehousing industry includes establishments operating warehousing and storage facilities for general merchandise, refrigerated goods and other warehouse products. Warehouses are one of the major segments of the rapidly growing logistics industry. Currently the segment has evolved from providing not only custody for goods but also offering value added services such as sorting, packing, blending and processing. With evolution of an organised retail sector modern warehouses for the storage of perishable goods have become indispensable In 2017, the global warehousing and storage market was estimated to be around $475 billion. The global warehousing and storage accounted for approximately 8 per cent of the overall logistics market in 2017. The warehousing and storage market was the fifth largest market in the global logistics market in 2017. North America is the largest geographic region accounting for nearly 28 per cent of the global market.

Globally, warehousing has moved ahead from single storey to multi-story warehouses in densely populated cities and expensive land spaces. A multi-story warehouse consists of more than one floor and is designed to increase the available floor space. It results in better land utilisation rate and enhances operational efficiency. Multi-story warehouses have been successful in densely populated cities predominantly in Asian countries such as China, Japan, Hong Kong and Singapore, due to high land and construction costs, small site areas and limited industrial land availability.

Domestic scenario
The warehousing market in India is highly fragmented with most warehouses having an area of less than 10,000 sq.ft. Approximately 90 per cent of the warehousing space in the country is controlled by unorganised players with smaller sized warehouses which have limited mechanisation. Fragmented warehousing footprint results in higher average inventory holding, in addition to resulting in higher storage and handling losses, driven by lower level of mechanisation.

Warehouses have become one of the major segments of the rapidly growing Indian logistics industry. Today they do not only provide custody for goods but also offer value added services such as sorting, packing, blending and processing. With evolution of an organised retail sector modern warehouses for the storage of perishable goods have become essential. The government’s initiatives to promote the growth of warehouses in the country through measures such as enactment of the Warehousing Act, 2007, investments in the establishment of logistic parks and Free trade warehouse zones (FTWZs) together with the introduction of Goods & Service Tax (GST) regime augurs well for the industry’s growth. Sensing the tremendous growth potential of the warehouse sector, the private players (including both domestic and international) have ventured with a view to bridge the gap between cost and efficiency of operations.

Nearly 60 per cent of the modern warehousing capacity in India is concentrated in the top six cities namely Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Chennai, Mumbai, NCR and Pune, with Hyderabad and Kolkata being the other major markets. This is driven by concentration of industrial activity and presence of sizeable urban population around these clusters. Going forward, due to factors like quality of infrastructure and availability of labour, these advantages are likely to remain with these cities. In all the segments of warehousing industry barring the agricultural segment, the majority of the capacity is controlled by the private sector. In the agricultural segment, approximately three-fourth is controlled by different government entities. The primary objective of a majority of these warehouses is to only store food grains and ensure food security.

Types of warehouses
Traditionally, warehouses were broadly classified into public-private, bonded, government and co-operative warehouses. Lately, cold chains, container freight stations (CFS) and inland container depots (ICD) are gaining importance.

Private warehouses: These warehouses are owned by private entities or individuals and are used exclusively for the goods owned, imported by or on behalf of the licensee. The warehouses are usually constructed at strategic locations to cater various manufacturing, business and service units. They are flexible enough to be customised in terms of storage and placement, according to the nature of the products.

Public warehouses: These Warehouses are licensed by the government to private entities, individual or cooperative societies to store goods of the general public. They are rented out against a fee and usually set up at transportation points of railways, highways and waterways, providing the facilities of receipt, dispatch, loading and unloading of goods. The government also regulates the functions and operations of these warehouses used mostly by manufacturers, wholesalers, exporters, importers, government agencies, etc.

Bonded warehouses: These warehouses are licenced by the Government to accept imported goods for storage until the payment of customs duty. They are located near the ports. They are either operated by the Government or work under the control of customs authorities. The warehouse is required to give an undertaking or "Bond" that it will not allow the goods to be removed without the consent of the custom authorities. The goods are held in bond and cannot be withdrawn without paying the customs duty. Such warehouses are very helpful to importers and exporters. If an importer is unable to pay customs duty immediately after the arrival of goods he can store the goods in a bonded warehouse. He can withdraw the goods in instalments by paying the customs duty proportionately. Goods lying in a bonded warehouse can be packaged, graded and branded for the purpose of sale.

Container freight stations (CFS)/inland container depots (ICDs): CFSs/ICDs are custom-bonded facility with public authority status for the handling and storage for containers. These depots equipped with warehousing space, adequate handling equipment and IT infrastructure.

Cold storage: A cold storage is a temperature controlled storage space catering mainly to agriculture and food industries. Cold stores are used for the storage and distribution of perishable goods such as fruits and vegetables, dairy products; frozen foods such as meat and ice cream, and temperature-sensitive pharmaceutical products. Given that India is primarily an agriculture country, cold storage has huge potential in India.

Government storage: The primary objectives of any government storage are 1) to ensure food security, and 2) enable trade movement both within and out of the country. Consequently, the Central Warehousing Corporation operates 431 warehouses (storage capacity of 100.28 lakh MT) including 44 custom bonded warehouses, 29 CFSs/ICDs, 3 air cargo complexes (ACCs) (5,961 MT) and 3 cold storage warehouses (2,419 MT). Further, various State Warehousing Corporations (SWC) manage a total capacity of 283.34 MT across 1,831 warehouses. The Food Corporation of India (FCI) works for holding agricultural produce to meet the requirements of various government schemes. FCI has its own storage capacity but also hires capacities from CWC, SWCs and the private sector.

Cold storage: There are over 7,700 cold storage warehouses with a capacity of over 36 million MT in India with a significant portion of the facilities being privately owned. India’s cold storage capacity is unorganised and dominated by traditional cold storage facilities. The distribution of cold storages is highly uneven with majority of the cold storages located in Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Punjab and Maharashtra. Further nearly two thirds of the total cold storage capacity is used for horticulture crops including potato. Despite the storage capacity, the Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology estimates that close to 15 per cent-16 per cent of fruits and vegetables perish as cold storages are located near consumption centres rather than farms. The cold storage segment is driven by growth in trading of perishable products both agricultural and others (e.g. pharmaceutical).

Regulations
WDRA rules:
Warehouses (especially agricultural) in India are regulated and governed under The Warehousing (Regulatory and Development) Act, 2007. The main objective of this Act is to develop and regulate warehouses, negotiability of warehouse receipts, establishment of Warehousing Development and Regulatory Authority (WRDA) and for related matters.

Registration: The act makes it compulsory for a person to carry on warehousing business as a business and issue a negotiable receipt to obtain a certificate of registration.

Warehousing receipt: The warehouse would issue receipts only after ascertaining quantity, quality / grade and other particulars as may be mentioned in the receipts.

Authority and Powers under the Act: Some of the authorities and powers conferred under the Act are granting registration and cancellation/renewal of registration, specifying qualification of warehouseman, and regulating rates, advantages, terms and conditions that may be offered by warehouseman in respect of warehousing business.

Offenses under the Act: Failing to ascertain quality and quantity, failing to surrender negotiable receipt by depositor or endorsee and payment of all his lawful charges and cancellation of encumbrances endorsed on the receipt to deliver the goods represented by the receipt are some of the offences under the act.

Penalties: The offences committed under this Act shall be punishable with imprisonment of a term of up to three years or with fine of Rs 1,00,000 or both.

The industry also remains governed by various acts such as: Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993, Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, Customs Act, 1962, Carriage of goods law etc. regulating the movement of goods and allied services. Various policy changes have impacted the warehousing sector in India. These include the introduction of the Goods and Service Tax (GST), National Policy on Handling, Storage and Transportation, and increasing Public-Private Partnerships (PPP). Following are a few such policy measures:

GST: GST has consolidated the tax regime across states which will result in cost and time efficiencies across the supply chain. GST will also hasten the consolidation of warehouses thus accentuating the formalisation of the largely unorganised warehousing sector. For most logistics services like e-commerce logistics, warehousing and air freight (export), the tax rate is 18 per cent, which is an increase from the earlier rate of 15 per cent which includes service tax and cess. Services like ocean freight and road transportation are in the 5 per cent slab. Under GST, the tax on warehouse, storage and other labour services has increased from 15 per cent to 18 per cent.

Logistics Parks Policy: Launch of multi-modal logistics parks and the grant of "industry" status to the logistics sector.

Domestic manufacturing emphasis: The focus on "Make in India" is expected to increase domestic manufacturing and increase the requirement for associated activities such as warehousing.
Agri-warehousing activity covered under Priority Sector Lending by RBI Subsidy schemes such as 1) Grameen Bhandaran Yojana – a capital investment subsidy scheme offered by the NABARD, which ranges from 15 per cent to 33 per cent of project cost, depending on the location and operator, 2) National Agricultural Renewal Fund. Govt. of India – encourage private investment in the creation of agriculture infrastructure
Tax incentives such as 1) Tax relief under 80(I)(B): tax holiday on warehousing income, 2) Investment-linked deduction under Section 35AD: 100 per cent upfront depreciation for tax purposes
The government permits 100 per cent FDI under the automatic route for all logistics services except courier and air transportation services. In case of courier services, 100 per cent FDI is permitted subject to the approval of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) while FDI up to 74 per cent is permitted under the automatic route for air transport services including air cargo services. Further according to media reports, the government is working on a policy to create new logistics hubs by preparing an integrated logistics plan. The new integrated logistics plan would be prepared by the logistics division in the department of commerce in consultation with various stakeholders.

Trends
Warehouse consolidation due to GST:
With the advent of GST and the consequent redrawing of supply chains, there will be significant consolidation of warehouses by companies in the consumption space. A bigger warehouse in an appropriate location would be able to better serve a larger area. This will lead to development of large modern technology based warehousing operations and rapid modernisation of unorganised godowns. Smaller local developers and property owners are expected to exit the space by selling out to the large institutional developers in existing clusters.

Reduction in inventory holding costs: Further the combining of smaller warehouses into a single larger one is also expected to reduce the inventory level requirements which are expected to positively impact the companies as inventory carrying cost is a significant share of costs.

Smart warehouses: With the increase in the warehousing and storage market there has been a concurrent increase in technology usage especially in the grade A/B warehouses. These warehouses use internet of things (IOT) to track a product in the warehouse and also helps in increasing efficiency and speed across supply chains. Variety of devices such as wearables, sensors and radio frequency identification tags are used to locate the products in the warehouse. This reduces the time to deliver the product to the customer and increases accuracy.

Rise of Direct Port Delivery (DPD): DPD involves the delivery of a shipment directly from a port to the consignee instead of initially holding it at a CFS (Container Freight Station). The DPD initiative under "Ease of Doing Business" has witnessed steady growth in terms of proportion of total containers handled. At JNPT, the share of Direct Port Delivery (DPD) has increased from 5.4 per cent in April 2016 to 39.2 per cent March 2018. This is likely to have an impact on the CFS. However, shortage of space at warehouses poses a challenge to service DPD clients efficiently.

High tonnage trucks sales are expected to rise: Supply chain realignment and check post discontinuation has led to a reduction in the travel time as well as fuel costs. This has led to a demand for larger more efficient trucks as warehouses are consolidating and larger loads are required at lower number of locations. Despite the higher upfront costs, such trucks are expected to reduce overall shipment costs by carrying a larger load per trip.

Negotiable warehouse receipts
Negotiable Warehouse Receipts (NWR) issued by registered warehouses enables farmers to seek loans from banks against NWRs and enables them to extend the sales period of modestly perishable products beyond the harvesting season. Consequently, NWRs can avoid distress sale of agricultural produce by the farmers in the peak marketing season. However, NWRs have not witnessed substantial growth due to 1) low levels of registered warehouses with WDRA, 2) minimal concession from banks for loans against NWRs, 3) presence of other collateral based lending entities, which do not require registration under WDRA.

Demand drivers for logistics
Emergence of MNCs and organised retail:
One of the key demand drivers for the logistics industry has been emergence of MNCs and the share of organised retail has been increasing over the years. Most of the global MNCs prefer low cost manufacturing locations connecting the consuming market at the lowest possible cost and through highly efficient supply chain.

Emergence of 3PL and 4PL: Third party logistics or 3PL is a concept where a single logistics service provider manages the entire logistics function for a company. While the Indian 3PL market is still very much in its infancy compared with other countries, it is experiencing healthy growth and attracting new companies eager to capitalise on the plentiful opportunities it offers, In fourth party logistics 4PL, logistics is controlled by a service provider that does not own the assets to carry out logistics activities but outsources to subcontractors, the 3PL. 4PLs facilitate single-point reference for all logistics needs, possess knowledge of logistics to obtain most efficient and effective solutions, have manpower resources of higher quality to supervise vendors and ensure continuous process improvements and, above, all an IT base to network customer systems.

Robust trade growth: Post liberalisation there has been significant increase in economic growth which has led to an improvement in the domestic and international trade volumes. Consequently the requirement for transportation, handling and warehousing is growing at a robust pace and is driving the demand for integrated logistics solutions.

Globalisation of manufacturing systems: IT plays a key role in transportation and logistics industry. Today technology is present in all the areas for a logistics service provider. Technology helps organised logistics companies score over the unorganised ones, and will be key to their operations going ahead given the competition

Increasing investment in logistics parks: The concept of Logistics Park has gained attention from both public as well as private players. A large number of special economic zones have also necessitated the development of logistics centre for the domestic market as well as for trade purposes

Growth in the organised retail and the food processing sector is driving growth in the cold chain storage segment in India.

Challenges
Lower Standardisation:
India’s logistics industry has been adversely affected by the lower standardisation of cargo and containerisation of logistics traffic, hampering the overall speed and thus increasing cost of storage and movement.
Need for large capital and issues related to land acquisition have also tempered the growth of the sector. However, with expected increase in investment by international players, the gap in funding requirement is expected to be addressed in the near future.
The industry revenue has grown at a modest CAGR of 2.5 per cent over the FY12 – FY17 period. Concurrently, the annual revenue growth rate has varied significantly over the same period. The companies generate the largest share of their revenues from rental i.e. storage charges; other sources of earnings include income from value added services such as such as sorting, packing, blending and processing. On the other hand, the key heads of expenses include employee costs, depreciation, SG&A costs, power & fuel costs and interest costs. Over the FY12-FY17 period, EBITDA margin has moved down as well as up ranging from a low of 7.2 per cent in FY14 to a high of 11 per cent in FY16 and declining to 10.1 per cent, while PAT margin has generally remained at around 2.5 per cent-4 per cent.

Although the debt levels of the companies have trended upwards, the debt to equity has generally remained stable, on the other hand, the interest coverage having peaked in FY15, has trended marginally downwards in the next two years. The decline in credit quality in the transportation and storage sector is on account of delays in debt servicing, liquidity constraints, decline in profitability and deterioration in the capital structure.

Outlook
CARE Ratings estimates that the warehousing industry will grow at a rate of 13-15 per cent in the medium term driven by the growth in manufacturing, retail, FMCG and ecommerce sector. Growth in overall production and consumption, organised retail, logistics outsourcing, and regulatory interventions such as WRDA Act and GST, private investments in logistics and other infrastructure developments such as Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) have also improved prospects of the organised professional warehousing segment. Further the implementation of GST is eliminating inefficiencies arising out of the erstwhile complex tax structure as well as interstate taxes.

Additionally, the government’s decision to allow FDI in retailing with emphasis on backend infrastructure such as modern warehousing space is also expected to provide further impetus to the sector.

Industrial warehousing is expected to grow due to various factors including the anticipated increase in global demand, growth in organised retail and increasing manufacturing activities, expansion of e-commerce options and growth in international trade. This segment is expected to witness significant activity as the presence of the unorganised segment which is dominant in the segment is also expected to significantly reduce and the companies would also be rationalising and consolidating their space requirements based on time to serve the market and not taxation.

Demand for agriculture warehousing is expected to grow moderately on account of high base and expected normal monsoons.

Integrated models, diversification across end-user industries are expected to drive growth of cold chain segment. Significant demand is also seen coming from storage of fruits and vegetables, and pharmaceutical segments.

The container freight station (CFS)/ inland container depot (ICD) industry although on a growth curve is expected to be under pressure due to the growth of Direct Port Delivery (DPD) and profitability is expected to be hampered with the anticipated loss of volumes and consequential lower utilisation.

However, the overall growth potential is limited by several key challenges like limitations in infrastructure connectivity, need for large capital and issues related to land acquisition which would need to be addressed for ensuring sustainable growth.

Source: CARE Ratings’ Industry Research on Overview of the India Warehousing Industry

India’s first multi-modal terminal on inland waterways! Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated India’s first multi-modal terminal on the Ganga river in his parliamentary constituency and received the country’s first container cargo transported on inland waterways from Kolkata.

This is the first of the four multi-modal terminals being constructed on the National Waterway-1 (River Ganga) as part of the World Bank-aided "Jal Marg Vikas Project" of the Inland Waterways Authority of India. The total estimated cost of the project is Rs 5,369.18 crore, which will be equally shared between the Government of India and the World Bank. Its objective is to promote inland waterways as a cheap and an environment-friendly means of transportation, especially for cargo movement. The Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) is the project implementing agency. The project entails construction of three multi-modal terminals (Varanasi, Sahibganj and Haldia), two inter-modal terminals, five roll-on-roll-off (Ro-Ro) terminal pairs, new navigation lock at Farakka, West Bengal, assured depth dredging, integrated vessel repair and maintenance facility, differential global positioning system (DGPS), river information system (RIS) and river training.

Disclaimer:
This report is prepared by CARE Ratings Ltd. CARE Ratings has taken utmost care to ensure accuracy and objectivity while developing this report based on information available in public domain. However, neither the accuracy nor completeness of information contained in this report is guaranteed. CARE Ratings is not responsible for any errors or omissions in analysis/inferences/views or for results obtained from the use of information contained in this report and especially states that CARE Ratings has no financial liability whatsoever to the user of this report.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Concrete

Balancing Rapid Economic Growth and Climate Action

Published

on

By

Shares

Dr Yogendra Kanitkar, VP R&D, and Dr Shirish Kumar Sharma, Assistant Manager R&D, Pi Green Innovations, look at India’s cement industry as it stands at the crossroads of infrastructure expansion and urgent decarbonisation.

The cement industry plays an indispensable role in India’s infrastructure development and economic growth. As the world’s second-largest cement producer after China, India accounts for more than 8 per cent of global cement production, with an output of around 418 million tonnes in 2023–24. It contributes roughly 11 per cent to the input costs of the construction sector, sustains over one million direct jobs, and generates an estimated 20,000 additional downstream jobs for every million tonnes produced. This scale makes cement a critical backbone of the nation’s development. Yet, this vitality comes with a steep environmental price, as cement production contributes nearly 7 per cent of India’s total carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.
On a global scale, the sector accounts for 8 per cent of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, a figure that underscores the urgency of balancing rapid growth with climate responsibility. A unique challenge lies in the dual nature of cement-related emissions: about 60 per cent stem from calcination of limestone in kilns, while the remaining 40 per cent arise from the combustion of fossil fuels to generate the extreme heat of 1,450°C required for clinker production (TERI 2023; GCCA).
This dilemma is compounded by India’s relatively low per capita consumption of cement at about 300kg per year, compared to the global average of 540kg. The data reveals substantial growth potential as India continues to urbanise and industrialise, yet this projected rise in consumption will inevitably add to greenhouse gas emissions unless urgent measures are taken. The sector is also uniquely constrained by being a high-volume, low-margin business with high capital intensity, leaving limited room to absorb additional costs for decarbonisation technologies.
India has nonetheless made notable progress in improving the carbon efficiency of its cement industry. Between 1996 and 2010, the sector reduced its emissions intensity from 1.12 tonnes of CO2 per ton of cement to 0.719 tonnes—making it one of the most energy-efficient globally. Today, Indian cement plants reach thermal efficiency levels of around 725 kcal/kg of clinker and electrical consumption near 75 kWh per tonne of cement, broadly in line with best global practice (World Cement 2025). However, absolute emissions continue to rise with increasing demand, with the sector emitting around 177 MtCO2 in 2023, about 6 per cent of India’s total fossil fuel and industrial emissions. Without decisive interventions, projections suggest that cement manufacturing emissions in India could rise by 250–500 per cent by mid-century, depending on demand growth (Statista; CEEW).
Recognising this threat, the Government of India has brought the sector under compliance obligations of the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS). Cement is one of the designated obligated entities, tasked with meeting aggressive reduction targets over the next two financial years, effectively binding companies to measurable progress toward decarbonisation and creating compliance-driven demand for carbon reduction and trading credits (NITI 2025).
The industry has responded by deploying incremental decarbonisation measures focused on energy efficiency, alternative fuels, and material substitutions. Process optimisation using AI-driven controls and waste heat recovery systems has made many plants among the most efficient worldwide, typically reducing fuel use by 3–8 per cent and cutting emissions by up to 9 per cent. Trials are exploring kiln firing with greener fuels such as hydrogen and natural gas. Limited blends of hydrogen up to 20 per cent are technically feasible, though economics remain unfavourable at present.
Efforts to electrify kilns are gaining international attention. For instance, proprietary technologies have demonstrated the potential of electrified kilns that can reach 1,700°C using renewable electricity, a transformative technology still at the pilot stage. Meanwhile, given that cement manufacturing is also a highly power-intensive industry, several firms are shifting electric grinding operations to renewable energy.
Material substitution represents another key decarbonisation pathway. Blended cements using industrial by-products like fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) can significantly reduce the clinker factor, which currently constitutes about 65 per cent in India. GGBS can replace up to 85 per cent of clinker in specific cement grades, though its future availability may fall as steel plants decarbonise and reduce slag generation. Fly ash from coal-fired power stations remains widely used as a low-carbon substitute, but its supply too will shrink as India expands renewable power. Alternative fuels—ranging from biomass to solid waste—further allow reductions in fossil energy dependency, abating up to 24 per cent of emissions according to pilot projects (TERI; CEEW).
Beyond these, Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) technologies are emerging as a critical lever for achieving deep emission cuts, particularly since process emissions are chemically unavoidable. Post-combustion amine scrubbing using solvents like monoethanolamine (MEA) remains the most mature option, with capture efficiencies between 90–99 per cent demonstrated at pilot scale. However, drawbacks include energy penalties that require 15–30 per cent of plant output for solvent regeneration, as well as costs for retrofitting and long-term corrosion management (Heidelberg Materials 2025). Oxyfuel combustion has been tested internationally, producing concentrated CO2-laden flue gas, though the high cost of pure oxygen production impedes deployment in India.
Calcium looping offers another promising pathway, where calcium oxide sorbents absorb CO2 and can be regenerated, but challenges of sorbent degradation and high calcination energy requirements remain barriers (DNV 2024). Experimental approaches like membrane separation and mineral carbonation are advancing in India, with startups piloting systems to mineralise flue gas streams at captive power plants. Besides point-source capture, innovations such as CO2 curing of concrete blocks already show promise, enhancing strength and reducing lifecycle emissions.
Despite progress, several systemic obstacles hinder the mass deployment of CCUS in India’s cement industry. Technology readiness remains a fundamental issue: apart from MEA-based capture, most technologies are not commercially mature in high-volume cement plants. Furthermore, CCUS is costly. Studies by CEEW estimate that achieving net-zero cement in India would require around US$ 334 billion in capital investments and US$ 3 billion annually in operating costs by 2050, potentially raising cement prices between 19–107 per cent. This is particularly problematic for an industry where companies frequently operate at capacity utilisations of only 65–70 per cent and remain locked in fierce price competition (SOIC; CEEW).
Building out transport and storage infrastructure compounds the difficulty, since many cement plants lie far from suitable geological CO2 storage sites. Moreover, retrofitting capture plants onto operational cement production lines adds technical integration struggles, as capture systems must function reliably under the high-particulate and high-temperature environment of cement kilns.
Overcoming these hurdles requires a multi-pronged approach rooted in policy, finance, and global cooperation. Policy support is vital to bridge the cost gap through instruments like production-linked incentives, preferential green cement procurement, tax credits, and carbon pricing mechanisms. Strategic planning to develop shared CO2 transport and storage infrastructure, ideally in industrial clusters, would significantly lower costs and risks. International coordination can also accelerate adoption.
The Global Cement and Concrete Association’s net-zero roadmap provides a collaborative template, while North–South technology transfer offers developing countries access to proven technologies. Financing mechanisms such as blended finance, green bonds tailored for cement decarbonisation and multilateral risk guarantees will reduce capital barriers.
An integrated value-chain approach will be critical. Coordinated development of industrial clusters allows multiple emitters—cement, steel, and chemicals—to share common CO2 infrastructure, enabling economies of scale and lowering unit capture costs. Public–private partnerships can further pool resources to build this ecosystem. Ultimately, decarbonisation is neither optional nor niche for Indian cement. It is an imperative driven by India’s growth trajectory, environmental sustainability commitments, and changing global markets where carbon intensity will define trade competitiveness.
With compliance obligations already mandated under CCTS, the cement industry must accelerate decarbonisation rapidly over the next two years to meet binding reduction targets. The challenge is to balance industrial development with ambitious climate goals, securing both economic resilience and ecological sustainability. The pathway forward depends on decisive governmental support, cross-sectoral innovation, global solidarity, and forward-looking corporate action. The industry’s future lies in reframing decarbonisation not as a burden but as an investment in competitiveness, climate alignment and social responsibility.

References

  • Infomerics, “Indian Cement Industry Outlook 2024,” Nov 2024.
  • TERI & GCCA India, “Decarbonisation Roadmap for the Indian Cement Industry,” 2023.
  • UN Press Release, GA/EF/3516, “Global Resource Efficiency and Cement.”
  • World Cement, “India in Focus: Energy Efficiency Gains,” 2025.
  • Statista, “CO2 Emissions from Cement Manufacturing 2023.”
  • Heidelberg Materials, Press Release, June 18, 2025.
  • CaptureMap, “Cement Carbon Capture Technologies,” 2024.
  • DNV, “Emerging Carbon Capture Techniques in Cement Plants,” 2024.
  • LEILAC Project, News Releases, 2024–25.
  • PMC (NCBI), “Membrane-Based CO2 Capture in Cement Plants,” 2024.
  • Nature, “Carbon Capture Utilization in Cement and Concrete,” 2024.
  • ACS Industrial Engineering & Chemistry Research, “CCUS Integration in Cement Plants,” 2024.
  • CEEW, “How Can India Decarbonise for a Net-Zero Cement Industry?” (2025).
  • SOIC, “India’s Cement Industry Growth Story,” 2025.
  • MDPI, “Processes: Challenges for CCUS Deployment in Cement,” 2024.
  • NITI Aayog, “CCUS in Indian Cement Sector: Policy Gaps & Way Forward,” 2025.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Dr Yogendra Kanitkar, Vice President R&D, Pi Green Innovations, drives sustainable change through advanced CCUS technologies and its pioneering NetZero Machine, delivering real decarbonisation solutions for hard-to-abate sectors.

Dr Shirish Kumar Sharma, Assitant Manager R&D, Pi Green Innovations, specialises in carbon capture, clean energy, and sustainable technologies to advance impactful CO2 reduction solutions.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Carbon Capture Systems

Published

on

By

Shares

Nathan Ashcroft, Director, Strategic Growth, Business Development, and Low Carbon Solutions – Stantec, explores the challenges and strategic considerations for cement industry as it strides towards Net Zero goals.

The cement industry does not need a reminder that it is among the most carbon-intensive sectors in the world. Roughly 7–8 per cent of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are tied to cement production. And unlike many other heavy industries, a large share of these emissions come not from fuel but from the process itself: the calcination of limestone. Efficiency gains, fuel switching, and renewable energy integration can reduce part of the footprint. But they cannot eliminate process emissions.
This is why carbon capture and storage (CCS) has become central to every serious discussion
about cement’s pathway to Net Zero. The industry already understands and accepts this challenge.
The debate is no longer whether CCS will be required—it is about how fast, affordable, and seamlessly it can be integrated into facilities that were never designed for it.

In many ways, CCS represents the ‘last mile’of cement decarbonisation. Once the sector achieves effective capture at scale, the most difficult part of its emissions profile will have been addressed. But getting there requires navigating a complex mix of technical, operational, financial and regulatory considerations.

A unique challenge for cement
Cement plants are built for durability and efficiency, not for future retrofits. Most were not designed with spare land for absorbers, ducting or compression units. Nor with the energy integration needs of capture systems in mind. Retrofitting CCS into these existing layouts presents a series of non-trivial challenges.
Reliability also weighs heavily in the discussion. Cement production runs continuously, and any disruption has significant economic consequences. A CCS retrofit typically requires tie-ins to stacks and gas flows that can only be completed during planned shutdowns. Even once operational, the capture system must demonstrate high availability. Otherwise, producers may face the dual cost of capture downtime and exposure to carbon taxes or penalties, depending on jurisdiction.
Despite these hurdles, cement may actually be better positioned than some other sectors. Flue gas from cement kilns typically has higher CO2 concentrations than gas-fired power plants, which improves capture efficiency. Plants also generate significant waste heat, which can be harnessed to offset the energy requirements of capture units. These advantages give the industry reason to be optimistic, provided integration strategies are carefully planned.

From acceptance to implementation
The cement sector has already acknowledged the inevitability of CCS. The next step is to turn acceptance into a roadmap for action. This involves a shift from general alignment around ‘the need’ toward project-level decisions about technology, layout, partnerships and financing.
The critical questions are no longer about chemistry or capture efficiency. They are about the following:

  • Space and footprint: Where can capture units be located? And how can ducting be routed in crowded plants?
  • Energy balance: How can capture loads be integrated without eroding plant efficiency?
  • Downtime and risk: How will retrofits be staged to avoid prolonged shutdowns?
  • Financing and incentives: How will capital-intensive projects be funded in a sector with
    tight margins?
  • Policy certainty: Will governments provide the clarity and support needed for long-term investment
  • Technology advancement: What are the latest developments?
  • All of these considerations are now shaping the global CCS conversation in cement.

Economics: The central barrier
No discussion of CCS in the cement industry is complete without addressing cost. Capture systems are capital-intensive, with absorbers, regenerators, compressors, and associated balance-of-plant representing a significant investment. Operational costs are dominated by energy consumption, which adds further pressure in competitive markets.
For many producers, the economics may seem prohibitive. But the financial landscape is changing rapidly. Carbon pricing is becoming more widespread and will surely only increase in the future. This makes ‘doing nothing’ an increasingly expensive option. Government incentives—ranging from investment tax credits in North America to direct funding in Europe—are accelerating project viability. Some producers are exploring CO2 utilisation, whether in building materials, synthetic fuels, or industrial applications, as a way to offset costs. This is an area we will see significantly more work in the future.
Perhaps most importantly, the cost of CCS itself is coming down. Advances in novel technologies, solvents, modular system design, and integration strategies are reducing both capital requirements
and operating expenditures. What was once prohibitively expensive is now moving into the range of strategic possibility.
The regulatory and social dimension
CCS is not just a technical or financial challenge. It is also a regulatory and social one. Permitting requirements for capture units, pipelines, and storage sites are complex and vary by jurisdiction. Long-term monitoring obligations also add additional layers of responsibility.
Public trust also matters. Communities near storage sites or pipelines must be confident in the safety and environmental integrity of the system. The cement industry has the advantage of being widely recognised as a provider of essential infrastructure. If producers take a proactive role in transparent engagement and communication, they can help build public acceptance for CCS
more broadly.

Why now is different
The cement industry has seen waves of technology enthusiasm before. Some have matured, while others have faded. What makes CCS different today? The convergence of three forces:
1. Policy pressure: Net Zero commitments and tightening regulations are making CCS less of an option and more of an imperative.
2. Technology maturity: First-generation projects in power and chemicals have provided valuable lessons, reducing risks for new entrants.
3. Cost trajectory: Capture units are becoming smaller, smarter, and more affordable, while infrastructure investment is beginning to scale.
This convergence means CCS is shifting from concept to execution. Globally, projects are moving from pilot to commercial scale, and cement is poised to be among the beneficiaries of this momentum.

A global perspective
Our teams at Stantec recently completed a global scan of CCS technologies, and the findings are encouraging. Across solvents, membranes, and
hybrid systems, innovation pipelines are robust. Modular systems with reduced footprints are
emerging, specifically designed to make retrofits more practical.
Equally important, CCS hubs—where multiple emitters can share transport and storage infrastructure—are beginning to take shape in key regions. These hubs reduce costs, de-risk storage, and provide cement producers with practical pathways to integration.

The path forward
The cement industry has already accepted the challenge of carbon capture. What remains is charting a clear path to implementation. The barriers—space, cost, downtime, policy—are real. But they are not insurmountable. With costs trending downward, technology footprints shrinking, and policy support expanding, CCS is no longer a distant aspiration.
For cement producers, the decision is increasingly about timing and positioning. Those who move early can potentially secure advantages in incentives, stakeholder confidence, and long-term competitiveness. Those who delay may face higher costs and tighter compliance pressures.
Ultimately, the message is clear: CCS is coming to cement. The question is not if but how soon. And once it is integrated, the industry’s biggest challenge—process emissions—will finally have a solution.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Nathan Ashcroft, Director, Strategic Growth, Business Development, and Low Carbon Solutions – Stantec, holds expertise in project management, strategy, energy transition, and extensive international leadership experience.

Continue Reading

Concrete

The Green Revolution

Published

on

By

Shares

MM Rathi, Joint President – Power Management, Shree Cement, discusses the 3Cs – cut emissions, capture carbon and cement innovation – that are currently crucial for India’s cement sector to achieve Net Zero goals.

India’s cement industry is a backbone of growth which stand strong to lead the way towards net zero. From highways and housing to metros and mega cities, cement has powered India’s rise as the world’s second-largest producer with nearly 600 million tonnes annual capacity. Yet this progress comes with challenges: the sector contributes around 5 per cent of national greenhouse gas emissions, while also facing volatile fuel prices, raw material constraints, and rising demand from rapid urbanisation.
This dual role—driving development while battling emissions—makes cement central to India’s Net Zero journey. The industry cannot pause growth, nor can it ignore climate imperatives. As India pursues its net-zero 2070 pledge, cement must lead the way. The answer lies in the 3Cs Revolution—Cut Emissions, Cement Innovation, Capture Carbon. This framework turns challenges into opportunities, ensuring cement continues to build India’s future while aligning with global sustainability goals.

Cut: Reducing emissions, furnace by furnace
Cement production is both energy- and carbon-intensive, but India has steadily emerged as one of the most efficient producers worldwide. A big part of this progress comes from the widespread use of blended cements, which now account for more than 73 per cent of production. By lowering the clinker factor to around 0.65, the industry is able to avoid nearly seven million tonnes of CO2 emissions every year. Alongside this, producers are turning to alternative fuels and raw materials—ranging from biomass and municipal waste to refuse-derived fuels—to replace conventional fossil fuels in kilns.
Efficiency gains also extend to heat and power. With over 500 MW of waste heat recovery systems already installed, individual plants are now able to generate 15–18 MW of electricity directly from hot exhaust gases that would otherwise go to waste. On the renewable front, the sector is targeting about 10 per cent of its power needs from solar and wind by FY26, with a further 4–5 GW of capacity expected by 2030. To ensure that this renewable power is reliable, companies are signing round-the-clock supply contracts that integrate solar and wind with battery energy storage systems (BESS). Grid-scale batteries are also being explored to balance the variability of renewables and keep kiln operations running without interruption.
Even logistics is being reimagined, with a gradual shift away from diesel trucks toward railways, waterways, and CNG-powered fleets, reducing both emissions and supply chain congestion. Taken together, these measures are not only cutting emissions today but also laying the foundation for future breakthroughs such as green hydrogen-fueled kiln operations.

Cement: Innovations that bind
Innovation is transforming the way cement is produced and used, bringing efficiency, strength, and sustainability together. Modern high-efficiency plants now run kilns capable of producing up to 13,500 tonnes of clinker per day. With advanced coolers and pyro systems, they achieve energy use as low as 680 kilocalories per kilogram of heat and just 42 kilowatt-hours of power per tonne of clinker. By capturing waste heat, these plants are also able to generate 30–35 kilowatt-hours of electricity per tonne, bringing the net power requirement down to only 7–12 kilowatt-hours—a major step forward in energy efficiency.
Grinding technology has also taken a leap. Next-generation mills consume about 20 per cent less power while offering more flexible operations, allowing producers to fine-tune processes quickly and reduce energy costs. At the same time, the use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as fly ash, slag and calcined clays is cutting clinker demand without compromising strength. New formulations like Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) go even further, reducing emissions by nearly 30 per cent while delivering stronger, more durable concrete.
Digitalisation is playing its part as well. Smart instrumentation, predictive maintenance, and automated monitoring systems are helping plants operate more smoothly, avoid costly breakdowns, and maintain consistent quality while saving energy. Together, these innovations not only reduce emissions but also enhance durability, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, proving that sustainability and performance can go hand in hand.

Carbon: Building a better tomorrow
Even with major efficiency gains, most emissions from cement come from the chemical process of turning limestone into clinker—emissions that cannot be avoided without carbon capture. To address this, the industry is moving forward on several fronts. Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) pilots are underway, aiming to trap CO2 at the source and convert it into useful products such as construction materials and industrial chemicals.
At the same time, companies are embracing circular practices. Rainwater harvesting, wastewater recycling, and the use of alternative raw materials are becoming more common, especially as traditional sources like fly ash become scarcer. Policy and market signals are reinforcing this transition: efficiency mandates, green product labels and emerging carbon markets are pushing producers to accelerate the shift toward low-carbon cements.
Ultimately, large-scale carbon capture will be essential if the sector is to reach true net-zero
cement, turning today’s unavoidable emissions into tomorrow’s opportunities.

The Horizon: What’s next
By 2045, India’s cities are expected to welcome another 250 million residents, a wave of urbanisation that will push cement demand nearly 420 million tonnes by FY27 and keep rising in the decades ahead. The industry is already preparing for this future with a host of forward-looking measures. Trials of electrified kilns are underway to replace fossil fuel-based heating, while electric trucks are being deployed both in mining operations and logistics to reduce transport emissions. Inside the plants, AI-driven systems are optimising energy use and operations, and circular economy models are turning industrial by-products from other sectors into valuable raw materials for cement production. On the energy front, companies are moving toward 100 per cent renewable power, supported by advanced battery storage to ensure reliability around the clock.
This vision goes beyond incremental improvements. The 3Cs Revolution—Cut, Cement, Carbon is about building stronger, smarter, and more sustainable foundations for India’s growth. Once seen as a hard-to-abate emitter, the cement sector is now positioning itself as a cornerstone of India’s climate strategy. By cutting emissions, driving innovations and capturing carbon, it is laying the groundwork for a net-zero future.
India’s cement sector is already among the most energy-efficient in the world, proving that growth and responsibility can go hand in hand. By cutting emissions, embracing innovation, and advancing carbon capture, we are not just securing our net-zero future—we are positioning India as a global leader in sustainable cement.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
MM Rathi, Joint President – Power Management, Shree Cement, comes with extensive expertise in commissioning and managing over 1000 MW of thermal, solar, wind, and waste heat power plants.

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds