Connect with us

Environment

Preventing electric arc hazards

Published

on

Shares

In electrical distribution network, protection coordination between LV circuit breaker located downstream of transformer and MV circuit breaker located on primary side of the transformer becomes extremely critical and complicated to ensure proper protection.

When a coordination of MV and LV circuit breakers is not carried properly it leads to frequent tripping of MV circuit breaker even when the fault is on the LV side, downstream of the network. For switching of MV circuit breakers, some time support will be required from local utility company, depending on the type electrical connection at site, which leads to longer down time and production losses.

The choice of the protection devices depends on the transient phenomena where the current may reach values higher than rated current for the transformer and decay in few seconds. The protection devices should also guarantee that the transformer cannot operate beyond the point of maximum thermal overload under short circuit conditions. In accordance to IEC 60076-5 the transformer is required to withstand value of short circuit current for not more than two seconds.

Fig 1 indicates rough profile of the transformer inrush current curve and corresponding withstand point for the given transformer.

In situations as shown in Fig 1, it is necessary that appropriate protective steps are considered both in the MV and LV network to avoid unwanted trips and to ensure that protection release curves are above the inrush current curve and below the withstand point.

To achieve that proper coordination becomes extremely important and critical. Protection relays and protection releases, which have versatile functionality, can ensure proper coordination.

As can be seen in following curve in Fig 2, there is good coordination between protection releases where only standard protection releases are applied on LV circuit breakers. In this case you will observe LV circuit breaker curve crosses over MV curve at approximately 7.5kA where both MV and LV circuit breakers trip (where maximum short circuit current is around 24kA).

The curve, as seen in Fig 3, developed with the incorporation of protection release, has additional feature of double short circuit setting in LV circuit breakers.

The protection releases in ABB circuit breakers can be offered with Double S protection function. This function enables two independent and simultaneously active protection thresholds that can be specified. With this feature, perfect selectivity is achieved in critical conditions.

It can be observed from Fig 4 that shows two possible settings for S protections, which are S and S2. When protection release is selected with two settings of time delayed short circuit settings, it enables close coordination between MV protection relay and LV protection release. This prevents nuisance tripping while transformer switches current and ensures its protection by getting curve below withstand point.

Ground fault protection philosophy
Implementing optimised cost effective ground fault protection in restricted zone is one of the key aspects. In many installations, including package substations, which are very common, RMU is used on the primary side of transformers. They normally have simple over-current relays and in most of the cases REF relays are not used. In this scenario the protection against fault in the restricted zone is critical to protect the transformer and improve its life cycle.

In Fig 5, the fault current is flowing inside LV breaker and protection release will sense the fault and clear the same. In the Fig 6, when fault occurs downstream the secondary side of transformer and upstream of circuit breaker, fault current does not flow through LV breaker. The only way to clear the fault is by tripping MV breaker. Due to the magnitude of current at primary side, which will be low corresponding to the relay on secondary side (if right type of relay is used), it will take longer time to trip, which will deteriorate the insulation of transformer leading premature failure. It will be much better if LV breaker has an intelligent protection release that can sense this fault and give trip command to MV breaker. This enhances system reliability and enhances transformer life cycle.

Protection against arc flash hazards
Every day hundreds of people are injured (sometimes with fatal injuries) due to arc flash related accidents. This is one of the highest risks all over the world. Safety is becoming more and more important as legal and regulatory requirements getting stringent.

The importance of safety has encouraged ABB to develop ?arc-proof? switchgears, where the mechanical design as well as the choice of electrical components reduces both the risk of an accident and its severity.

Types of fault in LV switchgear

  • Bolted fault Two or more live parts at different potential come in contact (Phase-Phase, Phase-Earth).
  • Arc Fault Occurs due to reduction in dielectric strength of insulating materials between two conductors.

The arc due to short circuit may occur due to various reasons in an LV switchboard. The arc may sometimes be a result of human errors. Poor connection will generate heat leading to an accident (This may be, for instance, due to hostile atmospheric conditions, excessive vibration, etc). The arc may also occur due to infestation of LV switchgear with insects creating a short circuit in the system.

The effect of arc varies based on arcing current and time. Time is the most critical factor that must be taken into account. The following infographic in Fig 6 shows the importance of responding in milliseconds.

The arc leads to a rapid build-up of pressure and heat. The arc temperature has been determined to be about 20,000?C. The extreme heat results in burning and melting of metals and release of toxic gases. This also leads to loss of production, damage to equipment and buildings.

The short circuit protecting devices within main distribution boards may not detect arc faults at times. This could happen due to:
1.In order to provide the required selectivity with downstream devices, the incoming circuit breakers are provided with intentional delay ranging from 150-200ms. The graph in Fig 6 shows that within this period the arc might cause major damage.
2.Due to the high inrush currents that arise during energisation of transformers, there is a high possibility of nuisance tripping of the circuit. As a result, the incoming circuit breaker protection release is set at higher value. Fault current responsible for arc formation might occur at a value lower than that set.

The arc formation phenomena can be divided into four phases

  1. 1.Compression phase: The air volume occupied by the arc is overheated due arc energy.
  2. 2.Expansion phase: Due to heat and expansion, the internal pressure increases and the hot air tries to escape through the weakest point.
  3. 3.Emission phase: The air inside LV switchboard is forced out.
  4. 4.Thermal phase: In this phase the temperature inside the switchboard becomes almost as hot as the arc. This is the final stage where all the metal and insulating parts come in contact with arc and undergo erosion.

Arc guard system uses with fibre optics that communicate at the speed of light for sensing the arc. The system can detect the intensity of light within the switchboard and it sends out a trip signal within 2ms. Fibre optics system is insensitive to any interferences from to magnetic field.

The disconnection time of the signal depends on opening time of the circuit breaker and the actual tripping time. It will be within 50ms. The arc guard system can be easily installed even in the existing LV Switchboard.

The arc guard system is designed and developed to ensure:

  • 1.Increased arc safety in switchgear to saves lives and reduces damages
  • 2.To be fast acting and reliable with SIL2 certification, and
  • 3.Point sensor design makes it easy to locate the fault and restart the system.

Protection coordination
For a process plants, selection of protection devices becomes very critical for ensuring power supply reliability. The selected solutions should provide economical and functional service for the complete installations and avoid unwanted shut downs leading to huge production losses.

The protection devices selected shall ensure:

  • Safety of the installation and people
  • Rapid identification of faults and isolate the fault area without affecting areas which are healthy, and
  • Enhance life cycle of complete electrical systems by limiting let-through energy flowing in the connected cables and equipment.

Current/time selectivity
In current selectivity, one can discriminate the fault zone by setting different values of short circuit protection. In time selectivity, apart from different values of current settings, even trip time is defined

Energy selectivity
This is specific type of selectivity, which exploits current limiting features of circuit breakers. As a user one needs to ensure that the type of circuit breakers to be selected are based on published chart.

Zone selectivity
In this case, dialogue is created between the circuit breakers in the network. When a current exceeds set threshold, the system allows only fault zone to be identified correctly and nearest breaker clears the fault without affecting other zones. The breaker close to the fault sends out a locking signal to the breaker at the higher level. Higher breaker also continuously checks for any locking signals from downstream breakers.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Concrete

India donates 225t of cement for Myanmar earthquake relief

Published

on

By

Shares

On 23 May 2025, the Indian Navy ship UMS Myitkyina arrived at Thilawa (MITT) port carrying 225 tonnes of cement provided by the Indian government to aid post-earthquake rebuilding efforts in Myanmar. As reported by the Global Light of Myanmar, a formal handover of 4500 50kg cement bags took place that afternoon. The Yangon Region authorities managed the loading of the cement onto trucks for distribution to the earthquake-affected zones.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Reclamation of Used Oil for a Greener Future

Published

on

By

Shares

In this insightful article, KB Mathur, Founder and Director, Global Technical Services, explores how reclaiming used lubricants through advanced filtration and on-site testing can drive cost savings, enhance productivity, and support a greener industrial future. Read on to discover how oil regeneration is revolutionising sustainability in cement and core industries.

The core principle of the circular economy is to redefine the life cycle of materials and products. Unlike traditional linear models where waste from industrial production is dumped/discarded into the environment causing immense harm to the environment;the circular model seeks to keep materials literally in continuous circulation. This is achievedthrough processes cycle of reduction, regeneration, validating (testing) and reuse. Product once
validated as fit, this model ensures that products and materials are reintroduced into the production system, minimising waste. The result? Cleaner and greener manufacturing that fosters a more sustainable planet for future generations.

The current landscape of lubricants
Modern lubricants, typically derived from refined hydrocarbons, made from highly refined petroleum base stocks from crude oil. These play a critical role in maintaining the performance of machinery by reducing friction, enabling smooth operation, preventing damage and wear. However, most of these lubricants; derived from finite petroleum resources pose an environmental challenge once used and disposed of. As industries become increasingly conscious of their environmental impact, the paramount importance or focus is shifting towards reducing the carbon footprint and maximising the lifespan of lubricants; not just for environmental reasons but also to optimise operational costs.
During operations, lubricants often lose their efficacy and performance due to contamination and depletion of additives. When these oils reach their rejection limits (as they will now offer poor or bad lubrication) determined through laboratory testing, they are typically discarded contributing to environmental contamination and pollution.
But here lies an opportunity: Used lubricants can be regenerated and recharged, restoring them to their original performance level. This not only mitigates environmental pollution but also supports a circular economy by reducing waste and conserving resources.

Circular economy in lubricants
In the world of industrial machinery, lubricating oils while essential; are often misunderstood in terms of their life cycle. When oils are used in machinery, they don’t simply ‘DIE’. Instead, they become contaminated with moisture (water) and solid contaminants like dust, dirt, and wear debris. These contaminants degrade the oil’s effectiveness but do not render it completely unusable. Used lubricants can be regenerated via advanced filtration processes/systems and recharged with the use of performance enhancing additives hence restoring them. These oils are brought back to ‘As-New’ levels. This new fresher lubricating oil is formulated to carry out its specific job providing heightened lubrication and reliable performance of the assets with a view of improved machine condition. Hence, contributing to not just cost savings but leading to magnified productivity, and diminished environmental stress.

Save oil, save environment
At Global Technical Services (GTS), we specialise in the regeneration of hydraulic oils and gear oils used in plant operations. While we don’t recommend the regeneration of engine oils due to the complexity of contaminants and additives, our process ensures the continued utility of oils in other applications, offering both cost-saving and environmental benefits.

Regeneration process
Our regeneration plant employs state-of-the-art advanced contamination removal systems including fine and depth filters designed to remove dirt, wear particles, sludge, varnish, and water. Once contaminants are removed, the oil undergoes comprehensive testing to assess its physico-chemical properties and contamination levels. The test results indicate the status of the regenerated oil as compared to the fresh oil.
Depending upon the status the oil is further supplemented with high performance additives to bring it back to the desired specifications, under the guidance of an experienced lubrication technologist.
Contamination Removal ? Testing ? Additive Addition
(to be determined after testing in oil test laboratory)

The steps involved in this process are as follows:
1. Contamination removal: Using advanced filtration techniques to remove contaminants.
2. Testing: Assessing the oil’s properties to determine if it meets the required performance standards.
3. Additive addition: Based on testing results, performance-enhancing additives are added to restore the oil’s original characteristics.

On-site oil testing laboratories
The used oil from the machine passes through 5th generation fine filtration to be reclaimed as ‘New Oil’ and fit to use as per stringent industry standards.
To effectively implement circular economy principles in oil reclamation from used oil, establishing an on-site oil testing laboratory is crucial at any large plants or sites. Scientific testing methods ensure that regenerated oil meets the specifications required for optimal machine performance, making it suitable for reuse as ‘New Oil’ (within specified tolerances). Hence, it can be reused safely by reintroducing it in the machines.
The key parameters to be tested for regenerated hydraulic, gear and transmission oils (except Engine oils) include both physical and chemical characteristics of the lubricant:

  • Kinematic Viscosity
  • Flash Point
  • Total Acid Number
  • Moisture / Water Content
  • Oil Cleanliness
  • Elemental Analysis (Particulates, Additives and Contaminants)
  • Insoluble

The presence of an on-site laboratory is essential for making quick decisions; ensuring that test reports are available within 36 to 48 hours and this prevents potential mechanical issues/ failures from arising due to poor lubrication. This symbiotic and cyclic process helps not only reduce waste and conserve oil, but also contributes in achieving cost savings and playing a big role in green economy.

Conclusion
The future of industrial operations depends on sustainability, and reclaiming used lubricating oils plays a critical role in this transformation. Through 5th Generation Filtration processes, lubricants can be regenerated and restored to their original levels, contributing to both environmental preservation and economic efficiency.
What would happen if we didn’t recycle our lubricants? Let’s review the quadruple impacts as mentioned below:
1. Oil Conservation and Environmental Impact: Used lubricating oils after usage are normally burnt or sold to a vendor which can be misused leading to pollution. Regenerating oils rather than discarding prevents unnecessary waste and reduces the environmental footprint of the industry. It helps save invaluable resources, aligning with the principles of sustainability and the circular economy. All lubricating oils (except engine oils) can be regenerated and brought to the level of ‘As New Oils’.
2. Cost Reduction Impact: By extending the life of lubricants, industries can significantly cut down on operating costs associated with frequent oil changes, leading to considerable savings over time. Lubricating oils are expensive and saving of lubricants by the process of regeneration will overall be a game changer and highly economical to the core industries.
3. Timely Decisions Impact: Having an oil testing laboratory at site is of prime importance for getting test reports within 36 to 48 hours enabling quick decisions in critical matters that may
lead to complete shutdown of the invaluable asset/equipment.
4. Green Economy Impact: Oil Regeneration is a fundamental part of the green economy. Supporting industries in their efforts to reduce waste, conserve resources, and minimise pollution is ‘The Need of Our Times’.

About the author:
KB Mathur, Founder & Director, Global Technical Services, is a seasoned mechanical engineer with 56 years of experience in India’s oil industry and industrial reliability. He pioneered ‘Total Lubrication Management’ and has been serving the mining and cement sectors since 1999.

Continue Reading

Concrete

Charting the Green Path

Published

on

By

Shares

The Indian cement industry has reached a critical juncture in its sustainability journey. In a landmark move, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has, for the first time, announced greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity reduction targets for 282 entities, including 186 cement plants, under the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, 2023. These targets, to be enforced starting FY2025-26, are aligned with India’s overarching ambition of achieving net zero emissions by 2070.
Cement manufacturing is intrinsically carbon-intensive, contributing to around 7 per cent of global GHG emissions, or approximately 3.8 billion tonnes annually. In India, the sector is responsible for 6 per cent of total emissions, underscoring its critical role in national climate mitigation strategies. This regulatory push, though long overdue, marks a significant shift towards accountability and structured decarbonisation.
However, the path to a greener cement sector is fraught with challenges—economic viability, regulatory ambiguity, and technical limitations continue to hinder the widespread adoption of sustainable alternatives. A major gap lies in the lack of a clear, India-specific definition for ‘green cement’, which is essential to establish standards and drive industry-wide transformation.
Despite these hurdles, the industry holds immense potential to emerge as a climate champion. Studies estimate that through targeted decarbonisation strategies—ranging from clinker substitution and alternative fuels to carbon capture and innovative product development—the sector could reduce emissions by 400 to 500 million metric tonnes by 2030.
Collaborations between key stakeholders and industry-wide awareness initiatives (such as Earth Day) are already fostering momentum. The responsibility now lies with producers, regulators and technology providers to fast-track innovation and investment.
The time to act is now. A sustainable cement industry is not only possible—it is imperative.

Continue Reading

Trending News