Connect with us

Uncategorized

Steelmakers Urge Government to Impose Temporary Tax to Curb Cheap Imports

Steel mills in India are experiencing considerable financial distress due to the large volume

Published

on

Shares

India’s steelmakers have appealed to the government to urgently impose a temporary tax on cheap steel imports from China, Japan, and South Korea. The Indian Steel Association (ISA) has raised concerns about the rising influx of steel at predatory prices, which is severely affecting the domestic steel industry. The ISA, representing major steel producers like JSW Steel, Tata Steel, and Steel Authority of India, made this plea in a presentation to the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), a division of the federal trade ministry.

According to the ISA, steel mills in India are experiencing considerable financial distress due to the large volume of low-priced steel being imported from surplus countries. The ISA warned that these imports are not only damaging the pricing structure of the domestic market but also threatening the survival of local steelmakers. The association noted that steel imports, especially from China, Japan, and South Korea, are priced at levels that local producers cannot compete with, putting significant pressure on their operations.

The ISA’s presentation also pointed to the growing issue of imports from Vietnam, which was once a buyer of Indian steel but has now become a net exporter of steel to India. This shift has exacerbated the situation, especially since Vietnam’s steel exports to India are often sold at low prices.

India, which is the world’s second-largest producer of crude steel, has also become a net importer of finished steel. Data for the fiscal year 2023-2024 reveals a sharp rise in imports, with finished steel imports during the first half of the year reaching a seven-year high. The growing imports are further squeezing margins for domestic mills, which have seen their profit margins drop by as much as 68% to 91%.

The ISA further pointed out that the situation is forcing companies to reduce production and delay capacity expansion, leading to uncertainty in the sector. JSW Steel, India’s largest steelmaker, has reported a third consecutive drop in profits, primarily due to the pressure from rising imports and falling domestic prices.

The DGTR has initiated an anti-dumping investigation into steel imports from Vietnam and is now assessing whether a safeguard duty should be imposed to counter the adverse impact on domestic producers. The outcome of this investigation will determine if additional duties will be applied to imports, though the ISA has pushed for swift action to ensure the survival of local steel manufacturers.

Uncategorized

SAIL Signs MoU with John Cockerill India for Green Steel

SAIL is focused on transforming its operations and adopting advanced technologies

Published

on

By

Shares

Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) has entered into a strategic partnership with John Cockerill India Limited (JCIL) to advance green steel production and technology within the steel industry.

The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed in Mumbai between SAIL Director (Finance) Anil Kumar Tulsiani and JCIL Managing Director Michael Kotas. This collaboration will focus on improving technologies in cold rolling, carbon steel production, green steel, and specialized silicon steels.

The partnership also aims to integrate green technologies into traditional iron and steelmaking processes to reduce carbon emissions and enhance resource efficiency. This move aligns with SAIL’s sustainability goals and its commitment to reducing the environmental impact of steel production.

SAIL is focused on transforming its operations and adopting advanced technologies to contribute to a greener future in the steel industry. The MoU marks a significant step towards the company’s vision of sustainable growth.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

India Considers ‘Safeguard Duty’ to Control Steel Imports

Indonesia’s steel consumption is around 17 mt.

Published

on

By

Shares

India is exploring the implementation of safeguard duties to curb the influx of steel at low or zero tariffs under the free trade agreement (FTA) with the ASEAN region. This move comes as Chinese companies expand their steel manufacturing capacities in ASEAN countries.
Discussions are underway between the steel and commerce ministries, ahead of the next India-ASEAN FTA review talks scheduled for February. Industry experts report that Chinese firms are adding approximately 97 million tonnes (mt) of blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) capacity in ASEAN, expected to be operational within the next 5-6 years.
With annual steel consumption in ASEAN at around 75 mt, there are concerns that the surplus production could be redirected to India due to the tariff advantages under the India-ASEAN FTA. “Discussions are ongoing, and measures like imposing a safeguard duty are being considered,” a senior government official said.
Alok Sahay, Secretary General of the Indian Steel Association, noted that the influx of 97 mt of new BF-BOF capacity in ASEAN countries poses a threat to Indian steel producers. “Given the current FTA and the limited growth in ASEAN’s consumption, these new capacities are mainly for export. India’s low-to-zero tariffs make it an attractive market compared to the EU or the US,” Sahay added.
The South East Asia Iron and Steel Institute (SEASI) projects that the region’s steel production capacity will reach 145 mt by 2026. Praful Venugopal, CEO of Mittal Steel Indonesia, mentioned that Chinese producers have signed agreements with Indonesia to set up plants that will contribute an additional 20 mt of capacity. Indonesia’s steel consumption is around 17 mt, and these new plants are designed to supply exports.
The anticipated oversupply from ASEAN could lead to depressed domestic steel prices in India, where production in FY24 was 139 mt, just slightly above consumption of 136 mt.
(ET)

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Steel Ministry restricts import of substandard products

The BIS has established 151 standards encompassing 1376 steel grades under the Steel Ministry’s QCO.

Published

on

By

Shares

The central government has identified instances of substandard steel imports and has taken measures to prevent their entry into the country. The Ministry of Steel stated that cheaper imports tend to lower domestic steel prices and negatively impact both large and small steel producers.

According to the ministry, numerous traders and manufacturers have been attempting to bypass the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) requirements by making minor alterations to steel grades. Official reports indicate that this appears to be an effort to import inexpensive steel under the guise of different grades.

The BIS has established 151 standards encompassing 1376 steel grades under the Steel Ministry’s Quality Control Orders (QCO). The ministry emphasized that this framework ensures compliance with BIS standards for both domestically produced and imported steel. The statement further highlighted that these measures are aimed at restricting the import of low-quality steel.

While steel imports require a BIS license, certain grades not yet covered by BIS standards may be imported with a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Steel Ministry. However, the ministry noted instances of misuse of this provision. Officials observed that many traders and manufacturers have been modifying steel grades slightly to circumvent BIS requirements.

Official data revealed that import applications for 1136 additional grades have been submitted to the Steel Ministry. Most of these grades are reportedly neither internationally recognized nor covered by BIS standards. They often involve minor variations in chemical composition or product dimensions and appear to facilitate the import of cheaper steel under the pretext of alternative grades. Furthermore, many of these shipments were ordered without obtaining the requisite NOC from the ministry.

Addressing concerns regarding restrictions on Japanese steel imports, the ministry clarified that 735 applications for importing Japanese steel had been received. Of these, 594 were approved, while 141 were denied due to non-compliance with established norms.

Continue Reading

Trending News

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSLETTER

 

Don't miss out on valuable insights and opportunities to connect with like minded professionals.

 


    This will close in 0 seconds